Thanks, Chuck, and good morning, everyone. On Slide 5, we highlight our MPP business, which is our version of mortgage warehouse lending. We utilize our proprietary state-of-the-art technology stack to offer a purchase program to mortgage bankers nationwide. As Chuck highlighted, we experienced tremendous success in that business, carrying the strong momentum we've built from the third quarter. Period ending balances increased by $473.2 million or 65% annualized and average balances increased by over $400 million from the prior quarter. Let me break that down this quarter's growth a bit further. First, we increased facility size for 6 existing clients, which totaled $225 million in additional capacity. Second, there were 9 new clients brought in, which totaled $345 million in additional capacity. And third, the overall utilization of our existing clients remained strong. During the third quarter, we had average MPP participations of $8.7 million. As we've reiterated on prior calls, participations remain an important component of our overall strategy, allowing us to manage the balance sheet and expand net interest margin while driving higher fee income. We continue to generate very strong returns on the MPP business with average yields of 7.10% during the quarter. If you include fees, these yields increased to 7.30%. These are both up from the prior quarter levels of 7.07% and 7.23%, respectively. About 40% of the MPP portfolio reprices immediately and the remainder reprices on the 15th of each month. The 25-basis-point Fed funds rate decrease took place on September 17, so we will not see the complete impact on yields until the fourth quarter. Now turning to Retail Banking on Slide 6. I'd like to highlight the results of the 3 main businesses within that segment. Starting with Residential Lending, which includes both our traditional retail and our consumer direct channels, we continue to perform well and take our share of industry volume. We closed $636.6 million in mortgages during the third quarter, which is down slightly from $665.5 million in the prior quarter. Mortgage rate lock commitments and applications both increased from the prior quarter, bolstered by an increase in refinance volume in September. During the third quarter, we sold $547.9 million, which represents approximately 86% of the total loans closed in the quarter, in line with prior quarters. Of that saleable production, 82% was in our traditional retail channel and 18% was in consumer direct. We sold approximately 79% of the saleable mortgage service released in the third quarter, which is consistent with the second quarter. Additionally, 72% of our overall production was purchased businesses in the third quarter, which is flat from second quarter level. With the decrease in mortgage rates that occurred during the third quarter of 2025, we saw an increase in overall refinance activity in that period. That increase came towards the later end of the quarter with September monthly refinance activity closer to 50% of the overall volume. For the quarter, we earned $21.0 million in net gain on sale of loans, that amount includes fair value increases on the held-for-investment loan portfolio and the lender risk account as well as gains or losses on portfolio loan sales. If you exclude those items, net gain on sale of loans was flat to the prior quarter level, which Brad will cover in more detail. We continue to look for opportunities to create additional efficiencies using technology and hire new talented lenders within the channel. In the third quarter, we continued to hire new mortgage professionals to help us continue to grow, bringing our total to 129 at quarter end. In the middle of Slide 6, we highlight our Digital Deposit Banking channel, where we feature a direct-to-customer platform and competitive product suite. Our funding strategy and deposit franchise are much different than those of a typical community bank, and we believe our strategy is quite simple but very effective. We ended the third quarter with $4.8 billion in total deposits, up from $4.5 billion in the second quarter. The breakout of these deposits is detailed in the appendix on Slide 12. The majority of our deposit growth compared to the prior quarter was from the new custodial deposit relationship we onboarded during the third quarter. This droves a $306.9 million increase in interest-bearing demand deposits from the prior quarter. Custodial deposit balances remain a critical piece of our overall funding strategy and a key benefit of the servicing business. As Chuck mentioned, we will continue to explore additional sources of non-broker deposits. We also saw a $34.3 million increase in noninterest-bearing demand deposits, which helped offset some of the runoff in the other deposit balances. On the right side of Slide 6, we highlight our Specialty Mortgage Servicing channel, where we focus on servicing first lien home equity lines tied seamlessly to demand deposit sweep accounts, including what we commonly refer to as AIO loans. We continue to realize the savings from our strategy to private label outsource the nonspecialized mortgage servicing to a scaled subservicer, while at the same time, expanding the amount of loans we service and increasing loan servicing fees. Excluding a $910,000 negative adjustment on the change in fair value of the MSR, we earned $2.0 million in loan servicing fees for Q3, which is up from $1.8 million in the prior quarter. Including loans we outsourced to a subservicer, we serviced 14,200 loans for others with a total UPB of $4.5 billion as of the end of the third quarter. Turning lastly to asset quality on Slide 7. This remains one of the largest risks for any bank and one we continue to monitor very closely, especially in light of what we are seeing reported from other banks this quarter. Let me start by saying we are not seeing any systemic credit quality or borrower issues in any of our portfolios. We had net charge-offs of $977,000 in the third quarter, which is up from $488,000 in the prior quarter. That represents an annualized net charge-off ratio to average loans of 7 basis points, which is still very strong and well below historical long-term averages. The charge-offs we took in the third quarter, similar to prior quarters, came from isolated occurrences. There were 2 larger mortgage charge-offs this quarter, totaling close to $500,000. Both of those charge-offs stem from unique circumstances. In the vast majority of instances where we are dealing with a nonperforming loan, there is sufficient collateral to cover the unpaid principal balance, which usually leads to little or no loss. Outside the higher level of charge-offs, our overall level of delinquent loans decreased and our asset quality metrics improved from the prior quarter. Let me provide some additional details on this. First, total delinquent loans, including both loans past due 31 to 89 days and nonperforming loans decreased by $4.6 million from the second quarter level. Second, we have a very sophisticated and granular CECL process. We spend a great deal of time analyzing the various risks. Our allowance for credit losses was $12.3 million for the third quarter of 2025, which reflects our disciplined underwriting, diligent risk control and low levels of loss history. Third, at September 30, 2025, MPP represented 54% of all loans, and we've continued to experience pristine credit quality in that portfolio. Fourth, virtually all our loan portfolio is backed by residential real estate, which typically carries much lower average loss rates than other asset classes. And fifth, our residential mortgage portfolio is also high quality, seasoned and geographically diverse. At September 30, 2025, our average FICO was 747 and our average LTV when you factor in mortgage insurance was 72%. Now I'd like to turn the call over to Brad to cover the financials.