Thank you, Danny. The first quarter was a terrific quarter in originations as we purchased $346 million of new contracts. That compares to $301 million in the fourth quarter of 2023 and $415 million during the first quarter of 2023. More good news. Our portfolio grew to $3.02 billion as of March 31, 2024. I note that's the highest portfolio amount in our 33-year history, and that's an increase from $2.97 billion as of December 31, 2023, and an increase from $2.86 billion as of March 31, 2023. As Brad said, the first quarter showed a positive growth trend. We did $102 million in January, then upped that to $105 million in February, and upped that to $139 million in March. The trick is to hold that volume, and we're optimistic we can do so. We used several credit initiatives to nudge our growth in the first quarter, which worked, but it is critical to note that none of those credit initiatives touched our LTV, our loan to value, which is the key credit metric that predicts losses. Didn't affect our price and didn't affect our fees. So all good news there. Those initiatives helped increase our organic growth of contracts through increasing our capture rate, our funding dealers and our dealer loyalty. One of the things that we've been focusing on for the last 2 years is to onboard and service more large dealer groups, which is defined by a dealer group with more than 15 dealers under their umbrella. When we launched that initiative in early 2023, the large dealer groups made up 17% of our business, and at the end of the first quarter, that has grown to 22%. That is exponential growth because instead of adding just one dealer, we're adding between [ 15 ] and 200 dealers per dealership. We currently have 70 sales reps. 42 in the field, 28 inside. We hired a new class of reps in the first quarter and will likely do more as the year heads out. This has and will help our growth going forward. We continued our ironclad partnerships with [indiscernible] and Pagaya in the first quarter, resulting in added origination volume and with Pagaya solid on gained profits. Another thing of note, we continue to build our customer service platform in originations. In the first quarter, we lowered our [ package ] return rate to an all-time low. We lowered our deal funding time to less than 3 days, and we significantly reduced our underwriting errors. All of these are metrics that encourage the dealers to send their applications and do business with CPS. In terms of competition, we continue to see waves of credit unions come in and out of the space with lower rates, and then they pull out of the space when the losses don't meet their expectations. Demand remains strong, and so there's enough business for the 5 or 6 of us that sort of dominate the market. Again, the sort of silver bullets for us and our friendly competitors are things like a recession and the unemployment rate. So far, there has been no recession. And even though unemployment ticked up just a bit, it hasn't affected our demand or our near-term portfolio performance. Taking a quick check on our Q1 risk profile. We continue to hold a strong APR at 21%. Probably the best thing in our risk profile is we've driven down our LTV from 125 to -- and it fluctuates between 118 and 119. Our payment-to-income ratio and our debt-to-income ratio, which we use in our scoring model, remains flat, which is great, and the amount of finance remains flat quarter-over-quarter at $20,500. Switching to portfolio performance. For the first quarter, DQ, including repossession inventory, ended up at 14.55% of the total portfolio as compared to 12.68% in the same quarter in 2022. Annualized net charge-offs for the first quarter were 7.84% of the total portfolio as compared to 7.74% as of the fourth quarter of 2023 and 5.20% in the same quarter in 2023. The positive news is that we indeed have turned the corner in terms of performance, as we've lowered our DQ compared to our previous quarter, and we've also lowered our charge-offs as compared to our previous quarter. So year-over-year, it's ticked up, but quarter-over-quarter, we've driven those metrics down. We've done this while utilizing less extensions, which is interesting. In terms of our vintages, it's no secret that the 2022 vintages have been challenging for the industry. We believe sort of as of the end of quarter 1, we've got our arms around the 2022 vintages. We've employed more collectors to collect those vintages, and we've been utilizing unique collection strategies to control those key metrics and flatten out those curves. The first 2 of our 2023 vintages were also challenging, albeit a little slightly more -- slightly less challenging, I should say. But the most critical thing to look at in our 2023 vintages is that our 2023-C vintage is doing much, much better. The 2023-D, while it's a little early to judge, is also looking to be much better, and those 2023 vintages might just normalize into our historical CNLs. Looking at how we stack up in the industry, we are reportedly, according to the investment bankers that we work with and the investors and our securitization bonds who follow the industry, note that we're outperforming all of our competitors in CNL performance on the 2022 and 2023 vintages and also our DQ. And interestingly enough, we're outperforming our competitors when it comes to the all-important recovery metric. One thing to note is in the first quarter, we bolstered our ARD department, which is in charge of collecting our charge-off balances. And after employing a few new initiatives and training up the staff, we've collected at least 40% so far in 3 months of what we collected all of 2023, and all of those collections go right to offset our losses. In terms of technology, we deployed our artificial intelligence scoring tool for fraud in the first quarter, which has significantly reduced synthetic fraud in our application base. That has already saved us over $1 million in the first quarter, and looking -- and we expect to save many more millions going forward on that, using that AI fraud tool. As I mentioned in our last call, we launched our gen 8 originations model in the fourth quarter of 2023. We have now had a chance to analyze the October 2023 originations where we originated those originations with gen 8. We also originated that paper with gen 7, and gen 8 has organically lowered our DQ by 200 basis points. So that bodes well for our DQ going forward, which also translates -- should translate to lower CNLs just through our AI model. And with that, I'll kick it back to Brad.