Thank you, Lana. Today, I'll provide a brief underwriting update and also discuss our pending catastrophe reinsurance program renewals. On Page 8 of our earnings presentation, it illustrates the enforced premium and exposure trends for our commercial business. Year-over-year, our premiums enforced were up about 16%, and our exposures were down 19%. During the first quarter, policies and total insured value decreased slightly with our account retention near our target, but new business was lower than expected due to our firm underwriting stance on pricing. This resulted in an average effective rate change of 4.3% across our enforced portfolio during Q1, and a nearly 8% improvement in our PML to premium ratio, which supports our assertion that the risk return profile remains very attractive. On Page 9 of our presentation, this is intended to show that market conditions remain favorable for underwriting profitability. We continue to push hard on insurance valuations with an average increase of 8.5% during the quarter. The adoption of higher deductibles was impacted by our decision to pause the 7.5% and 10% wind deductible offerings until a revised regulatory filing was completed. This has now been fixed, and we will continue to push the appropriate terms and conditions when and where appropriate. Switching over to personal lines. Page 10 of our earnings presentation shows the renewal business rate and account retention trends for the last 6 quarters, which are helping drive improvement in underwriting results. Retention in the first quarter was very strong at nearly 92%, despite the impact of double-digit average rate increases for policies renewed. Overall, our policy count and total insured value was flat compared to year end, but with average premiums up, we also saw improvements in our risk-adjusted metrics with PML to premium and average annual loss to premium, each improving about 4% during the current quarter. Finally, I'd like to touch on the highlights of our projected catastrophe reinsurance renewals at June 1, 2024. Pages 11 and 12 of our presentation show our projected reinsurance towers and our expectations for American Coastal Insurance Company and Interboro Insurance Company. As of today, we have secured over 90% of the total limit being sought, and the placement is progressing in line with our expectations. Our primary goals for this upcoming hurricane season are threefold. First, we want to increase the overall protection. Second, we want to improve cost efficiency. And third, we want to maintain retentions that are similar as a percentage of our capital from the expiring program, along with those retentions being less than our underwriting profit before an event in any typical quarter. I believe we will achieve all 3 this year. For American Coastal, we're seeking to purchase roughly $265 million more limit from the private market this year, which will stretch our exhaustion point up closer to $1.2 billion for the 208-year return time compared to the expiring program of 167-year return time as estimated by the AIR hurricane model. $200 of the additional open market limit was secured in a new 3-year catastrophe bond that closed in April. And as Dan mentioned, the most significant change will be the reduction of our quota share from 40% to 20%. The net result of that will be a material increase in net premiums earned, partially offset by higher net losses, as we retain more of those, and higher policy acquisition costs, as we see a decrease in ceding commissions during the treaty year from June 1, 2024 through May 31 of 2025, as we seek to retain more of our gross underwriting margin. We intend to keep the statutory insurance company's retention at $10 million, but increase our captive's first event retention from $2.3 million to approximately $10 million and reduce our second event retention to only $10 million. For Interboro, the exhaustion point will look very similar to the expiring program, despite our exposure base being down about 17% year-over-year at September 30, 2024. And our retention will be reduced from $3 million to $2.5 million. We expect to have both towers fully placed well before June 1, and we will provide more information on the final limits retentions, and costs once both programs have been completed. That completes our prepared remarks for today, and we are now happy to take any questions.