Well, good morning, everyone. Welcome to our Q4 fiscal year '19 earnings call. Thank you for joining us today. I'm Jack Truong, CEO of James Hardie group, and with me here today is Matt Marsh, group CFO.

And both of us will share with you the results for fiscal year '19, and then we're going to share with you where we're going with our strategy and the status of our strategy..

So firstly, on the agenda, we'll have -- so I would briefly go over the operating review for the company in the fiscal year '19, and Matt will come up and share with you in more detail on the financial results of the quarter and also the year.

And I'll get back up and really share with you the progress of the 3-year strategy that we shared with you 3 months ago, where we are relative to the execution along that 3-year horizon. And then we'll end with the Q&A..

North America, Asia Pacific and Europe. And the discussion today will be a lot more in depth about those 3 -- the results in the 3 regions for the whole fiscal year '19 because this is the first year that Fermacell results are in, in our results for that whole fiscal year..

So if you look at our year in review, North America delivered improved PDG, although it's below expectations. So if you look at our PDG for fiscal year '19, we are north of 1% relative to the PDG of minus 2.5% a year before.

And our interior business is still a challenge, and it is something that we'll be discussing with you some more on what is the key strategy that we have taken to really fundamentally revert the course of the interior business..

Now moving on to Asia Pacific. Australia and the Philippines continue to lead the way in gain in market share both in the market share and category share. So at the end, we continue to deliver a growth above market. That continued also into Q4 of fiscal year '19..

Our European business has really met our expectations. This is a full year of Fermacell being part of James Hardie group. The team's really performed well, delivered the financial that met our expectations. But equally important is that the team has really done a nice job of integration into James Hardie.

And during the course, of the past 12 months, together with James Hardie teams from Asia Pacific and North America, the team in Europe has really done a nice job of really understand what are some of the unmet opportunities in Europe for -- where we can use our fiber cement technologies to come up with the fiber cement products specific growth for the European market, for the European channel and end users.

And I'm going to share a little bit more of the update in that in the strategy section..

We -- for fiscal year '19, we continue to be challenged with the input costs, continue to go up particularly in the third and fourth quarter. And this is always important for us as a company that we focus on lean manufacturing to mitigate the effects of rising raw material cost.

And again, I will share with you the status of where we are with that journey.

And through -- just like in the past, we continue to be very disciplined on our capital allocation focused primarily in organic growth as well as really provide the right capacity for continued growth to the 35/90 in North America as well as growth of our markets in Asia Pacific.

And of course, just to make sure that we continue to focus on our core business and get our business back on track on the growth above market, we also decided to exit the Windows business..

Now let's move on to North America. You can see that we -- the housing market demand was soft in the second half of the fiscal year '19. And our -- despite that, our exterior business grew above the market, showing improvements from the prior year. As I have mentioned before, our volume was up 4.7% in the fiscal year '19 for the exterior business.

And that's been little bit offset by the soft performance in the interior business where our volume was down by 4.4% in fiscal year '19. And of course, the mix for exterior business is a lot bigger than interior in our North American business..

Our EBIT margin, we came in at around 23%, which is really the -- within the target range really despite the inflationary trends across key input costs. It's really about we -- our ability to be able to pass on price as well as manage our cost and performance in the plants.

And to make sure that we continue to gain momentum, the commercial transformation and lean transformation are really underway and is beginning to gain traction in our business..

Now let's move on to the Asia Pacific results. Now we continued to deliver excellent top line results on the softening market across the region. So you look at fiscal year '19, for the region, our volume grew 10%. And that translated to about 11% in revenue growth for the year.

And so our growth is really driven primarily through Australia and the Philippines throughout the whole year, and that's really driven too by the fact that we have been really focusing a lot on primary demand at the end user, the builders and contractors, while at the same time we were also enhancing the James Hardie value through our channel partners to ensure that we have the right go-to-market strategy to drive demand and then be able to convert into sales in a more sustainable way..

And again, we have mentioned that we continue to gain market share of fiber cement against brick and also against wood and plywood within the region. And within the fiber cement category, during this past fiscal year, our business in Australia as well as in the Philippines that we continue to gain share against other fiber cement producers..

Our EBIT and EBIT margin was significantly impacted by input cost inflation within Asia Pacific. So we had quite a bit of inflation in raw materials as well as the fact that within the region, we pay our fiber as well as some key raw material in U.S. dollars.

And with the devaluation of the Australian dollars, that's added some headwinds in our business in Asia Pacific..

Now let's move on to Europe. Again, for the total year, the team really did a nice job of delivering top line growth of 7% in euro, and that translates to a pro forma EBIT growth of 36% for the year. And it's really about growth of the core business of Fermacell, that's the fiber gypsum, across Western Europe particularly in Scandinavia and the U.K.

and also in Switzerland and Benelux. And an issue the team has spent a lot of time during this past year to really done a lot of very good market research to understand those unmet needs and really come up with a right product portfolio that we'll continue to develop for the European market.

And I will share with you one of those products in the strategy section a little bit later..

Our EBIT margin is not so -- came in with expectation for the whole year. The team delivered a 10.6% margin, which is what we had discussed with you about a year ago..

So with that, I would like to hand over to Matt, who will go into more details about our financial in Q4 and fiscal year '19. And I'll come back up and discuss the strategy.

Matt?.

Thanks, Jack. All right. Good morning, everybody. Okay. So I'll take everybody through the financials for FY '19 and the fourth quarter. Overall, a good financial performance last year, especially considering the significant inflationary environment that we were in on most of our raw materials and freight cost.

As Jack already talked about, our North America business continued to see momentum on the exterior side on -- growing above our addressable market. Asia Pacific had a really good year on both market share gains and category share across the Asia Pacific business..

Overall, we are very pleased with the Fermacell result in year 1 with the pro forma results that we -- Jack shared with you earlier and I'll take you through in a bit, and the integration very much remains on -- right on track. So we're very pleased with where we are a year into that business.

And then we've fully exited the Windows business, which I'll take everybody through where we stand on those transactions..

For the year, we are reporting adjusted NOPAT of $300.5 million. We had capital expenditures last year of $301 million, primarily consisting of the capacity projects that everyone's already aware of. But I'll give everybody an update on those later in the presentation. We declared a second half dividend of $0.26 per share.

We had talked throughout the year about being in the lower end of our 50% to 70% dividend payout range for as long as we're above our leverage target -- or above our leverage target, I think as many of you know, as a result of the Fermacell acquisition. So we've correspondingly come down a bit in the range. The range hasn't changed at all.

It remains 50% to 70% of adjusted NOPAT. We're just down in that range in comparison to a year ago as a result of being above the leverage target. And when I get to the capital allocation framework and the financial management policy, I'll talk more about that..

Okay. So 4Q results for the group. Net sales were up 19% largely because of the Fermacell acquisition. That business has been in the result for the whole fiscal year. So of the $99 million of increased sales, almost $90 million of those is a result of Fermacell.

In North America, we had both higher volume and net price, higher volumes particularly in the exterior business and price across the segment and then higher volumes in the Asia Pacific business, which I'll take everybody through when we get into the business results. Gross profits were up 10%. Gross margin rates were down almost 260 basis points.

What you're really seeing there for the most part is the inflationary cost pressure, mainly pulp and freight, that we experienced in Asia Pacific and North America. Adjusted net operating profit was down 9% largely due to the North America and Asia Pacific segments, were down 8% and 22%, respectively. And we'll get into those dynamics.

Those are largely input costs and freight related..

For the full year, net sales were up 22%. Very similar dynamic as what I talked about in the fourth quarter. So of the $452 million increase year-over-year in net sales, $332 million of that was a result of Fermacell. North America same story in the full year as the fourth quarter, both price and volume, were up year-on-year.

Asia Pacific had very good volume growth year-on-year. Gross profits were up 14% for the full year. Margin were down 230 basis points..

So what you can see in the fourth quarter is the margin compression a little bit more than the full year. As Jack mentioned, the input costs were greater from an inflationary perspective in the second half of the year than the first half of the year, and you're seeing that in the margin compression.

When I talk about input cost later, we'll talk about kind of where we see those now and what that may mean for the upcoming year. Adjusted net operating profit increased about $9 million. It's a combination of Europe Building Products, our Europe business and our North America segment, both increased for the year..

Okay. So for North America, a slight improvement in PDG, as Jack indicated. We think we're above about 1% PDG on a market that we think was a 3% to 4% type growth market in terms of our index. So on exterior volume for the quarter of about 3.5% growth, for the full year almost 5% growth, 4.7%.

The interiors business was down nearly 10% for the quarter and down about 4.4% for the full year. Price was right about where we thought it would be for the year. You can see that it's up 3% for the full year. I think that's right around where we have been talking about for most of the year.

That was largely a result of our strategic list price changes that we do annually every April, and I'd say tactical pricing is very much kind of on track and where we expected it to be. Full year EBIT of $382.5 million, which was flat compared to a year ago.

And really the dynamics there are higher volume and average net sales price offset by input costs, largely, and freight..

Here's a chart, I think, that everyone knows fairly well. The red dotted line indicates our stated margin range of 20% to 25%. You can see throughout the year, we remained right inside that range.

The 23% was right in the middle of our range, largely in the middle of the range at this part of the cycle because of the inflationary environment that we were in last year and the significant headwinds of both pulp and freight as well as some of the other input costs. But those were the large 2 drivers resulted in being in the middle of the range..

Okay. Speaking of input costs, pulp was really the story last year. It remained at a very elevated level. I think it peaked sometime around October, November. It is down in comparison to October, November. So where we saw pricing in March and where we see pricing today, it's definitely down 3%, 4% but still up year-on-year.

So it still remains at a very elevated level. We're starting to see the gap widen again in the spot market and in the contract market, which is an encouraging sign. Those 2 markets are basically close to being a -- the equivalent pricing, so the spot market had basically evaporated. We largely buy off of U.S.-based index versus the China-based index.

So for those of you that follow pulp, you know that the Chinese spot market has definitely come down quicker than the U.S. market, and the U.S. market is declining. But last year, pulp for the market prices were up almost 12% year-on-year. We buy better than the 12%, so we didn't experience 12% cost increase in pulp.

But nonetheless, pulp prices were up pretty significantly for us..

Gas, cement were up for the year as well. You can see electricity was about flat. Freight prices came down in the fourth quarter, which is encouraging. They were very elevated in the first half of the year. I think when we spoke in February, I had indicated we are starting to see some good signs in the market, that the freight market was coming back.

And 3 months later, we're continuing to see that. So certainly, it looks like the freight market is returning to a more reliable supply/demand equation..

Asia Pacific, very strong volume. Sales volumes were up 10% for the year, 7% in the quarter. So a great result for the Asia Pacific business, both in Australia and the Philippines. The APAC business overall had good market penetration, gaining category share and market share last year.

So even though the underlying addressable market was softening throughout the year, the overall growth and market penetration remained quite strong..

You can see that their EBIT growth was adversely impacted on a U.S. dollar basis by the strengthening U.S. dollar. On a local currency basis, it was down 2%. The difference between kind of the deleveraging, if you will, between sales growth and EBIT growth is really 2 dynamics. There's input cost. We buy much of our pulp in Asia Pacific in U.S. dollar.

So you get kind of a double impact. You get the strengthening U.S. dollar on top of the rising cost of the contracted spot rates in the marketplace. And that was the primary driver. And then as we had talked about, I think, throughout the year last year, New Zealand manufacturing continued to underperform.

And that showed up in the result to some extent..

When you go through the 3 main businesses in the Asia Pacific, Australia, great growth story, market penetration and category gains in that business. We talked about EBIT already. In New Zealand, very good growth for both the quarter and for the full year.

In addition to the input cost, we had manufacturing that was operating at the lower end of its operating band for most of last year. That performance is starting to stabilize now, although throughout the year, it showed up in the result.

In the Philippines, good volume increase driven by market share gains, so overall good market penetration, higher input cost. And we did of some nonrecurring items in that business as well as we started up the new manufacturing line, and those results show up in the full fiscal year..

Okay. So for the Europe segment, the overall increase was obviously driven by Fermacell. The price, you can see year-on-year, looks -- is, on a reported basis, down. I'll just remind everybody that fiber gypsum sells at a significantly lower price than fiber cement.

And as a result of the mix towards a business that's largely fiber gypsum on a year-on-year basis, the pricing metric report's down. Net sales in euros were up 7% for the quarter and the full year on a pro forma basis.

And the margin rates excluding the nonrecurring cost were right in line with where we expected them, 10.6% for the full year and a little over 11% for the fourth quarter. We had $3.5 million of integration costs in the fourth quarter and $18 million of integration costs for the full year.

In addition to that, we had $6.2 million of inventory fair value adjustments that we reported during the fiscal year. And we included those results, obviously, in the segment and then provide transparency in the EBIT Excluding line..

The other business was our Windows business. We made that decision and announced that, I think, at the November discussion. The execution of the exit of that business has gone pretty well. Last year, we had $30.9 million of EBIT losses in that segment.

That included about $6 million of operating losses and $24 million related to the discontinuation of the business. We think all those charges are fully run through the P&L at this stage. The Beechworth business was wound down.

And the Razor pultrusion business, we went through a selling process, and that business was successfully sold in April of our fiscal '20. So you'll note that it's still in the results in the March 31 period, but you'll see that, that sale transaction got completed in April.

So both the Razor and the Beechworth assets are largely fully off the balance sheet at this point. We're going to do some liquidation of some of the remaining assets in Beechworth, but the book value is basically 0 on those..

So here's a summary of the product line discontinuation. In addition to Windows last year, we discontinued the MCT business, which was one of our trim lines. You can see all of that activity on MCT and the discontinuation of certain ColorPlus SKUs as a result of our Win With Color strategy. Those charges were all in the second quarter of last year.

And then the Windows business came in, in kind of 3 separate quarters. The bulk of that, we took in the second quarter of last year. We did additional write-downs in the third quarter. And then as we went through the selling process on both of those businesses and the outcomes were more clear, we finished things up in the fourth quarter..

Research and Development, we reported $29 million of cost associated with our Research and Development last year, roughly flat to where it was a year ago and roughly in line with our about 2% to 3% as a percent of sales. Our general corporate costs for the year were roughly in line and flat to where they were a year ago, so $57.3 million.

You'll see a little bit of variation quarter-to-quarter as we had some legal items related to New Zealand weathertightness that created some quarter-to-quarter variation.

Year-on-year, I'll just remind everybody that we had a nonrecurring gain a year ago included in the fiscal '18 result of $3.4 million that was associated with a building that we had in our Fontana, California manufacturing location that we sold.

And then I'd say the normal variation of volatility that you get in stock comp gets reflected on a quarter-to-quarter basis. But overall, I'd say general corporate costs, right in line with where we thought they would be and roughly flat to about a year ago..

Income tax. We reported 14.8% adjusted effective tax rate for the full year. That's pretty in line with what we had talked to in the last result about -- and at the half year result. The decrease in the adjusted income tax expense is driven by an adjustment that we made related to ongoing accounting treatment for amortization of intangibles.

That's very consistent. No change with the last couple times that we talked on that. And as a reminder, our income taxes aren't currently payable or paid in Australia due to the losses associated with AICF and our contributions to it..

We reported cash flow from operations for fiscal year '19 of $288.4 million, down 2%. I'd say the decrease in other assets and liabilities and working capital is, I'd say, normal quarter-to-quarter variation. So nothing of a concern there. The net cash outflow due to working capital again was just quarter-to-quarter variation.

No real consumption of working capital that we expect to be a feature of the result. The higher investing activity was obviously as a result of Fermacell and closing that acquisition and funding it in Europe on top of the capacity expansion-related CapEx within the year that I'll provide more on the next slide on..

the Tacoma greenfield, which we expect to have completed the startup of that in the early part of our fiscal '21 -- sorry, in the early part of our fiscal '20; the continued construction of our Prattville manufacturing location that we expect to complete and commission in the early part of fiscal '21, so next year, next fiscal year; and then the continued expansion of our ColorPlus product line.

We were opportunistic and bought a piece of land and some buildings in Massachusetts during the year. And at some point in the future, we'll also put some ColorPlus manufacturing capability there. And so those were the 3 main projects that drove the spend in North America. Asia Pacific had 2 main projects.

We completed the capacity expansion in the Philippines, and we're in the middle of the Carole Park brownfield expansion project. Both of those projects are very much on track..

Within our financial management framework. The overall framework hasn't changed. We obviously started the framework with wanting to make sure our business are performing at expectations.

We're an organic growth company, and so we're looking to grow top line results above our market index on volume and be modest price takers, overall having good margin rates in the business. With those in place -- and we're working hard to get the strategy to continue to produce results that are more in line with both our and your expectations.

Our top capital allocation priorities remain the same, so no change on that. We fund all the organic growth opportunities first. Those largely come in, in the form of R&D and capacity expansion as well as funding sales and marketing OpEx. That remains our #1 priority..

The ordinary dividend remains our #2 priority. That's very consistent. We're committed to the 50% to 70% payout ratio. We obviously operate within that ratio based on where we are with the balance sheet. We were opportunistic last year and bought a very good business with Fermacell.

That put us above our target debt range of 1x to 2x adjusted EBITDA for a period of time that we think at the time was roughly 8 to 10 quarters. We're about halfway through that period now. We're right on track with our balance sheet and overall capital management. So we like where we are.

We think in about 1 year, 1.5 years, we'll be back under the 2x ceiling again. And as a result, you can expect that we would then start to come up back into the range where -- and over time back to where we were in that range. But we're still very much in the range.

We're committed to that range, and I'd say our balance sheet strategy is very much on track..

As I mentioned earlier, we closed the year with about $79 million of cash, $1.3 million -- $1.3 billion of net debt and about $340 million of available credit facilities in our revolving credit facility. No change in the corporate debt structure.

We reported 2.4x net debt at the end of the year, and that's right where we expected it to be and right on track to get below 2 in about another 4 to 5 quarters..

As many of you know, the fourth quarter result also includes the annual update of the KPMG actuarial study that AICF commissions KPMG to do annually. So that was updated as of 31 March and is reflected in our result. The undiscounted, uninflated estimate decreased to $1.4 billion from $1.443 billion in the prior year.

That was a combination of the net cash outflows of $142.8 million and a slight increase in the actuarial estimate for the year..

Total contributions in our fiscal '19 results were AUD 138.4 million or USD 103 million. Since the time that we established the AICF back in 2007, the company's contributed approximately $1.2 billion into the fund, and we anticipate that we'll make up a USD 100.9 million contribution this July as part of our annual funding commitment.

The $100.9 million represents the 35% of our free cash flows for fiscal year '19..

A little bit on the claims for the full year. Claims received into AICF were 8% below the actuarial estimate. They were approximately 1% higher compared to the prior year. So overall a good outcome there. Claims reporting during the full year from mesothelioma were 4% lower than the estimate, 5% lower than the prior corresponding period.

So also a good data point in claims trend. Average claims settlement for the year were 24% below the actuarial estimate. It was largely attributable to lower average claim settlements for non-mesothelioma claims..

In summary for the financial section, so a good financial performance given the dynamic environment that we were in on the input cost and inflationary side, higher net sales in North America and in Asia Pacific. Both of those segments grew the top line.

Market penetration and category share gains and a really good top line outcome and business outcome for the Asia Pacific segment. A really positive first year for JH Europe. We like where we are a year into that result, and we remain committed to our capital allocation priorities and working within our financial management framework..

So with that, I'll hand it over to Jack, who will take everybody through our strategy update. .

Thanks, Matt. Okay. So let's go to the next slide. So we confirm that our long-term value creation for James Hardie group is about north -- in North America, 35/90 is our north star. And it's really about driving growth above market with strong returns, 20% to 25% EBIT margin, and that's our north star.

Europe is really about creating the EUR 1 billion business with a good Hardie-like return for the long term. And for APAC, it's really about making a good business to continue to be better, and that's about delivering growth above market with strong returns and a 20% to 25% EBIT margin..

So with that being the strategy, we're really about -- that's about the objective. So what we really want to talk about now is what is our key strategic priorities that, as a company globally, that we need to focus on to ensure that we fulfill that long-term objective.

And so this is the 3-year strategic priority that we shared with you 3 months ago, and I'd just like to give you an update on where we are..

And so in North America, it's all about accelerate exterior growth. It's really all about making sure that our marketing and sales team drive the penetration of the total exterior solution that James Hardie has in the marketplace.

And that is about driving the panels, planks, the HardiePanels, HardiePlanks, HardieTrim, HardieSoffit, to really provide that total exterior solution that allow the homeowners to have the low maintenance and the durable with the -- to really -- flexibility in designs.

And I'm going to show you a little bit later on how we bring that to life through the Win With Color program to drive category share growth..

And second in North America, it's really about how do we continue to become -- to transform ourselves to deliver a lower -- continually lower and lower unit costs and better quality.

And that is about transforming us from being a world-best fiber cement producer into a world-class manufacturer through lean transformation, and I'll give you some updates on where we are with that..

And third which is an area that we will begin to have a lot more focus on and that is to make the interior business a growth business again. And that is going to be a key focus for us going forward..

For Europe, it's really about we acquired Fermacell really to give us that strong footprint in Europe, with strong channel access as well as closer to the markets with the builders/specifiers so that we can build a more meaningful and profitable fiber cement business for the long term.

And we're going to continue to gain traction in our current fiber cement products as well continue to develop and launch fiber cement products for the European market..

And -- but on top of that, we got to continue to drive growth in our base business, which is the fiber gypsum business.

With the James Hardie manufacturing know-how, this is where we'd like to apply a lot more of the capability to our European plant fiber gypsum to continue to unlock more capacity and drive more of the unit cost reduction so that we can enhance our EBIT margin for our European business as well as provide additional cash to invest in market development..

Asia Pacific, it's really about continuing to improve on our playbook that's been successful.

And that is about investing at the end users as well as through the channel to amplify the push-pull effect that's been effective for us and take lean transformation to the next level and continue to learn and share the best practices with what's going on in North America..

Now let's move on to give you an update on lean transformation in North America. It is off to a very, very strong start. It is a -- that we confirm the targets that we have shared with you 3 months ago, and that is to deliver $100 million in cost out savings over a 3-year period from fiscal year '20 to fiscal year '22.

And the implementation of the lean concept is really beginning to take a stronghold across all of our plants in North America..

Our employee engagement's very, very high, particularly in plants where we executed the -- we call it the Hardie Manufacturing Operating System. This is really the way that we run our plants based on lean.

So wherever that we roll out to our plant, which is in Waxahachie, in Peru and Pulaski in the past 3 months, our employee engagement in those plants have been very high. The consistency of production have been really, really good as well as the variability in how we produce our products and the throughput has really been reduced significantly..

And through this whole process, we have built a central organization of lean manufacturing experts as well as appoint key manufacturing team members within our plants that become lean change agents through the organizational capability that we begin to drive a lean culture throughout the network of plants across North America.

Our goal is to have, by the end of the year -- fiscal year that all of our manufacturing plant employees in North America are completely trained in lean so that we can begin to drive a lean culture throughout manufacturing organization..

I'd like to share with you this chart on the bottom right of the page here. So this is the actual cost, the unit cost per standard feet across the network of plants in North America. And this is without -- taking out the depreciation tax and insurance and freight. So it's really the real manufacturing cost of producing products.

And if you look at the highest point here, that is the unit cost of our products in December of last year. And that was about the time that we really started the lean journey within North America..

And you can see that since March of last year to December, you can see that our unit costs have been going up. A lot of that is really in the raw material cost increases. But also there's some of the plant performance -- lack of performance in the -- leading up to December.

And just in there, we start -- our team started to drive and really build an execution of lean manufacturing through our plants. You can see that we started to have a lower unit cost in a more consistent way during the past 4 months. And if you look at our April actual unit cost, it's about in the same range as May of last year..

So it's really good to see that it's not only that employee engagement is high but it also produced the result that we intend to do with lean. But again, lean is a continuous process. It's a continuous improvement. That is a never-ending journey.

It is an area that at least that we know that we're making the right decision, the right focus the organization in the right direction and now -- we are continue to drive that improvement across our network of plants..

Now let's move on to our -- to the -- to North American acceleration of exterior growth. So for us, to get to 35/90 for short, mid and long term, it's all about, first, that we have to convert the vinyl homes into fiber cement. And really the what -- to make that happen is about the Win With Color.

It is about our ability to deliver fiber cement in many different type of colors that would allow the developers as well as the builders to build homes with different aesthetics and different designs that would differentiate them comparing to other builders and developers but at the same time provide a low maintenance and durability to the homeowners..

And just to give you a reference here, this is the development in Nashville, Tennessee that we're able to convert this development from vinyl into fiber cement. And you can see also here, this is about a $300,000 to $400,000 per home development.

And to the left side is what we call the statement color, which is really the core groups of colors that we produce every day that the market can buy from us. And then on the right-hand side are these part of the more than 700 different colors that people can order from us. We call that the Dream Collection.

And you can see that by doing that, together with having our HardiePlank, HardiePanel, HardieTrim and HardieSoffit, that we're able to provide that complete exterior look that looks very nice and allow the builder to differentiate their development versus others..

And on the right -- bottom right is -- this is a development in -- outside of Boston, Massachusetts. And it is roughly a $700,000 to $800,000 home area that we're able to convert from vinyl to our Win With Color program with the HardiePlanks, HardieTrim and HardiePanels. So this is really about the what.

This is really what we would use to continue to develop our business against vinyl to really drive that category expansion -- market expansion. And really that's the what, and this is really the how..

The how is really about the commercial transformation that we shared with you back in February. That is traditionally in North America, we have been focusing a lot more on to continue to convert new builders. We haven't really put a lot of focus on the channel and how to create more value with the channel [ in order ] to create demand.

So that's what we call the push/pull effect. And this is really the transformation of our commercial organization that need to happen to make sure that we can have a more repeatable, more sustainable capability to drive growth above market so as we create demand and that need to translate into sales for us through the channel..

And a key part of that is really about for us, we got to be easier to do business with. And it's important for us to set up the organization within the channel that has a capability of really being able to show and demonstrate that our channel really make more money by selling our products versus others. So our sales team structure has been in place.

Our key sales leaders have been hired. And so the team -- the talent continue to be filled within the organization. So the commercial organization, it is a little bit tougher than the lean transformation because it's not within 100% of our control because we have to convince our customers as well as we also have competition that we have to deal with.

But certainly, we are on the right track. Now let's move on to give you an update on our European business going forward.

One of the key synergy that we saw with the Fermacell business is really about Fermacell has a fiber gypsum board, and that is a high-performance board [ intended ] for the interior use that is really 1 board of fiber gypsum can replace 2 gypsum board or a board of gypsum and OSB because it has multiple properties within 1 board, that is fire resistant, water resistant and acoustic reduction.

And then so with fiber cement, it is about the exterior. So our team at Fermacell, the former Fermacell James Hardie in Europe, already have access to the specifier, the architects and designer.

And this is the case where our team was able to -- that they have -- already have the penetration contact with the specifier to build this kindergarten in Brittany of France, which is the northwest coast of France, which is where the temperature is on the extreme next to the Atlantic Ocean.

So it's a very good value proposition for our fiber cement, which is then -- so you can see that this team was able to build this new kindergarten with the James Hardie fiber cement panels and planks in the exterior and then with the Fermacell interior wall for the inside. That's a total solution..

I'd also like to share with you the very, very exciting things really about -- for our growth with Europe, the march to that EUR 1 billion for the long term is really about, yes, we've got to continue to grow fiber gypsum but on top of that we have to really build -- develop new fiber cement product for the European market.

This is really an exciting case because really leverage on our global capability. There's an unmet need in Europe about -- really about we call it the weather protection system for -- in Scandinavia and in the U.K.

by the coast that -- in the construction -- new construction or remodeling of homes or commercial buildings that there is that need to have a temporary sheet that really attach to the frame and that would allow the workers to continue to work inside and -- before they need put the clad in at a later date.

And a lot of time, that can be up to 12 months. And so this was a need that really is just as a market opportunity for our teams in Scandinavia..

So they happen to have a meeting with our team in New Zealand, and there, there was a similar type of concept of product in New Zealand.

And then the team from Europe took that product and market test in Europe and it showed that was pretty close to what their needs are, but they need to have a few other key requirements that we have to modify to meet the European market.

And that is it has to have to the fire resistance and also they have to survive up to 12 months in the elements and have to be easy to affix to the structure so that you can use staples or nails..

So the team then passed on this product concept to our R&D center in California, and the team then worked to redevelop the formulation, tested it. And then finally worked with the end users in Europe and then it was then manufactured our Pulaski plant in Virginia and then finally shipped to Europe for sale.

And that starts selling beginning this week, actually. So it's really a very good case of how we can leverage our capability at James Hardie around the world. And now that we have a market access in Europe, to be able to grow our business in Europe with fiber cement developed for the European market and then fit for use for the European market..

And so this is really the -- what are some of the key assumptions that we have for our fiscal year '20 and our market outlook. In North America, we continue to affirm that there can be modest growth in the U.S. housing in fiscal year 2020. The residential housing start will, our assumption, be between 1.2 million and 1.3 million homes.

EBIT margin will be in the top half of 20% to 25%. Exterior volume will be at 3% to 5% PDG. Europe, slight housing market growth across our addressable market in Western Europe. We'll be introducing new fiber cement product for Europe this year, and so we expect to see EBIT margin accretion for our European business.

Asia Pacific, the addressable housing market in Australia decreases this year. In fact, this already happened. APAC volume will be 3% to 5% growth above market. And with the continued focus on the lean transformation in APAC, we also expect to see that our EBIT margin will be in the top half of our stated range of 20% to 25%..

So with that, we'll close right here and we'll open up for Q&A. .

Peter Steyn from Macquarie. Just a quick hone in on the commercial transformation aspects, and particularly your intent to be easier to do business with. We've obviously seen a couple of movements in the channel just more recently.

But could you give us a bit of a sense of where you're going in terms of -- or how you're going in terms of traction with further important channel partners as well as the internal realignment of some of your sales plans and intent and people?.

Yes. Peter, that's a very good question. Traditionally, James Hardie in North America, we have been focusing so much onto the pulp side which is at the builders and contractors' level.

And we haven't really made the strong effort to really engage with our channel partners in terms of how do we make it more easy for them to receive our products, to have the right pricing with us and how to be able to navigate within James Hardie company in the way that we get the right information for them to run their business with our products a lot more simple.

And that would center around the supply chain synchronization between us and our channel partners to be able to deliver our product to the markets in the right way..

So it is an area that's a key foundational focus for us. That's part of the commercial transformation is really about adding that capability, about what we call the key account management. And that is not just about the job of the salesperson. The salesperson is the quarterback or the coordinator of James Hardie to the account.

To where we would have the mirror image relationship between the top management around the channel -- big channel partners with us with same side from myself and then with Sean Gadd and then our new Head of Sales all the way down. And then across to different functions from sales, market and products, supply chain and finance.

So that is the structure that we're building right now to allow us to serve our channel partners a lot better and in a more significant way so that allow us to continue to penetrate the markets. .

And then perhaps just a quick follow-up on that. The disruptive aspects of that reorganization, has that been worse or better than what have you expected. .

I think the -- I would say that the level of engagements of us with our channel partners in North America has a lot of room to improve.

I think it's more than I had expected and so that's why it's important for us to really put a strong focus on the key account management and that is a very, very -- and that is -- it takes a different skill set and it takes a different focus to make sure that we manage that part correctly, while we got to make sure that we continue to invest and deploy the right skill set of the market development folks and the business development folks to go and create new demand for fiber cement to the conversion against vinyl and wood and so on.

So those are the 2 separate focus, but then management have to align those -- the demand and then the channel management together to ensure that we have -- create the sales from the demand that we just created. .

And sorry, if I may, just a quick question then on lean. You've indicated that you've had throughput yield improvements and had available hours up, yet cost per square foot still stable. Presumably, that's largely a consequence of pulp prices, I assume.

But can you give us a bit of a sense of what's happened at Waxahachie, Pulaski and Peru in terms of unit costs? Perhaps at a more granular level, have you actually seen reductions there?.

Yes. So in the plant, particularly in Waxahachie and Pulaski, we actually have a really quite a step change in improvement in our unit cost in a very substantial way. In Peru, it's improved but it's not improved at the level that -- compared to the other 2 plants yet. .

It's Andrew Scott from Morgan Stanley. Probably one for Matt. But Jack, happy for you to chime in. Just your guidance for particularly North America, top half of the 20% to 25% range. I note that in the comments there, one of the assumptions is increasing input cost, input cost inflation. As you mentioned freight's come away.

It looks like pulp's turned the corner now.

Is that just conservatism at the start of the year? Or is there something that you're seeing that we're not aware of that's going to suggest that we'll still going to see input cost inflation throughout the year?.

Yes.

And I mean -- that's one component -- is that it's really more about you can see that we have -- we launched in the Win With Color program and you see that we are -- we also launched in our commercial transformation, which is going to take some of the investment to make sure that we are able to drive traction to drive -- to really create the sustainable PDG.

So that's just why we are -- at this point is a -- it's the savings that will allow us -- afford us the capability to drive more sales growth or more PDG growth. Go ahead, Matt. .

Yes. On input cost, before I get to your question, Andrew, I think I had mistakenly said that pulp was up 12% for the year. Just as a correction, it was up 12% in the quarter. For the year, pulp was up closer to 19% for the year. So sorry for that. The -- on your question, pulp's definitely look like it's coming up but it's still pretty elevated.

So on a year-on-year basis, it's still up. If you looked at April to April pricing as an example or May year-to-date pricing compared to May year-to-date pricing a year ago, it's still up. It's off of where it was a year ago -- or sorry, it's off of where it was last month. It's off of where it was at the peak, but it's still pretty elevated.

But pulp's still trading on the RISI index at like 1,300, which is still very, very elevated. So that result will sort of continue..

There is an assumption that we will see a trend down in pulp. But I think I said that in February and I think I said that in November, too. So I think I'm fairly cautious on the pulp market's ability to kind of forecast itself. We are seeing good trends, I'd say, over the last 6 to 12 weeks, but it's still pretty elevated.

So that comment is much more around does the trend follow or does it stabilize at a really high level? And that would obviously have an effect where we would be in that upper end of the range. But even when taking that into account, we still feel pretty comfortable saying that we'll be in top half of our range for next year. .

If I extend that to Australia, and I assume it's the same assumption, where are we going to get that -- the help in margin there will be coming right from in this quarter, at least, the bang on the bottom end of the range to the top half of the range there because it is a meaningful step up. .

Yes. On a year-on-year basis, New Zealand manufacturing, no doubt, go from being a headwind in the result to a contributor to the result. That will be significant. Keep in mind, we did have in the second quarter of our fiscal '19 that one-off item in the Philippines.

You take those 2 items and you go -- that has a pretty significant impact just with those 2 items. And then we're not forecasting anything on foreign currency, obviously. And we've got the same assumption for pulp so -- that we have in North America. .

And just, Matt, as we sit here today, obviously we've had Fermacell integration to roll through, we've had the business closures. As we look into '20, are there any items you expect to take effectively below the line? And in particular, I assume you'll expense the strategic costs -- cost of delivering the strategic initiatives, et cetera.

Is there anything we need to think about going forward?.

Nothing really below the line. We've got some additional Fermacell integration costs to go. I think those will be in the $5 million to $7 million range for this year. It's primarily associated with completing the stand up of the back office.

As you remember, Fermacell was owned by a private equity company and we've had it completely stand up both the personnel and the IT infrastructure associated with the back office functions. And so we're probably about 2/3 of the way done with that, and there's some additional costs in fiscal '20 associated with that.

Nothing else -- I mean, we think we're through the product line review and the portfolio review, so we're not expecting additional product line discontinuation cost. I'm not expecting other items below the line in fiscal '21 -- in fiscal '20. .

Simon Thackray from CLSA. Jack, can we just start with the interiors market, down 10 in the quarter? That looks like it's still moving away from you. Can we talk about the drivers of that. I mean, we probably all gone through and seen the luxury vinyl tile taking some share, et cetera.

How much of this problem is a Hardie problem versus a market problem?.

Good question, Simon. In our interior business, I would say 80% of our market access is through the retail channel and so really about the fundamental in retail is really about, position, placement, pricing and promotion and product. And so essentially, let's talk about product. We have essentially 2 SKUs in the channel for a long time.

And for us to grow in this category, we got to have critical mass. And so really it's important for us to really come out with new products and then continue to refresh our category to make us as a destination within the retail channel for the contractors.

So that's the first and last in one area that -- for innovation that we're going to focus intensely on..

Second is more of the short term and that is about placement. We -- our product today, with the 2 SKUs that we have, we're not in full in the building material section of those 2 key retailers. We're primarily in the tile section where you have less traffic.

And then you have -- you don't have the traffic of those heavy user contractor walk through there, so we have to fix that placement..

And then third is really about the positioning. It's really about to make sure that our products are well positioned in the store so that the contractors -- that we can attract new contractors and be able to use our product in different applications..

So in summary, it's really about, I would say, 75% that is really within us, within our control, and 25% is really about the markets.

And of course, when you have a new product like -- new category like LVT coming in, it's really incumbent for a manufacturer to say, "Okay, if that's the case, what are we going to do differently to make sure that we can continue to grow?" So those are the 3 key strategic actions that our teams are working on right now and -- so that we can fundamentally improve the position for the interior business.

.

And you've launched a new product well, at least at the trade level, the aqua or hydra, whatever it is. I can't remember. .

Yes, HydroDefense. .

Yes, HydroDefense.

So is that now -- is that being rolled out?.

Yes. So it is a product that we just rolled out to the pro channel. Yes, as you know that in the retail channel is really, to cut into the planogram, is do that once a year. And so we have to wait until the time that they change the planogram within retail to be able to launch that into retail..

And -- but that's just the first step. The other step is really about let me sure now that we can come out with the new interior products that would resonate well with those unmet need in the market here.

I think I mentioned at the last earnings call is that our business -- 85% of our business in Europe is really interior business today, and 35% of our business in APAC is interior business.

So there's a lot of know-how, a lot of the new product concept and opportunity that we can really now to bring together as a global team to come up with those new products. So I'm optimistic about that capability. .

Great, that's very helpful, Jack. Matt, just a quick one on the asbestos. Just a refresher, it's been a while. You're paying at 35% of operating cash flow. There was always an opportunity within the agreement for there to be step downs to 30% to 25% over time.

What are the requirements to get to that? Is that feasible to get a step down in the payment? You're saying you've forked out $1.2 billion now and you've made an acquisition so the EBITDA's presumably gone up and the free cash flow presumably goes up. .

Yes. Over time, at some point, there'll probably be an opportunity for that to step down. The requirement in the AFFA is that when the cash outflow from the fund is less than the annual contribution and cash inflow to the fund, when that occurs over a period of time, then we can start to take a step down in the contribution rate.

So it's a formulaic approach. I think it will be some time still before that occurs. Certainly, the last couple of years are more positive trends, I'd say, with respect to cash flow. And last year was certainly a very good trend. But I think we're still a bit away before we see them. .

Brook Campbell-Crawford from JPMorgan. Just on the 3% of volume growth in the fourth quarter, can you talk about how that progressed through the quarter.

And if it continued into April, also how the order file is looking?.

Order file. The famous order file. As we discussed last quarter, it's really about -- we look at our -- our commercial transformation is going to take some time and we said back then, it would take us about 6 or 7 months in into the new fiscal year to gain traction.

So at this point, I wouldn't expect our exterior growth to be materially different from what you've seen in the fourth quarter until around 6 months from now. .

Lee Power, Deutsche Bank. Jack, can you just talk a little bit about pricing in FY '20. I know there's a comment in the presentation you're satisfied about price positioning.

What price increases, if any, have you got coming through?.

You want to take that, Matt?.

Yes. Yes, we think price in fiscal '20 will be around 2%. So pretty similar to fiscal '19, I think it was at 3%. We didn't -- we haven't changed our approach in the way we do strategic pricing. It's the same process. We're still a value pricer.

So that 2% naturally, we do through a series of products and region reviews where we're evaluating our price position versus our commercial objectives. So there's a range, if you look at our product portfolio and our region portfolio, you'd see a range around that in that 2%. Last year, that weighted average ended up being closer to 3%.

This year, the weighted average or fiscal '20's weighted average will be closer to 2%. So we're still pretty satisfied overall with where we are on the strategic pricing..

No real change on the tactical side. That 2% obviously includes a combination of the strategic price, plus what we think we're going to do in tactical this year. And we're obviously trying to align both the strategic and tactical pricing to the commercial transformation that we're doing.

But we're pretty happy overall with where price is, and we think it will be around 2% for fiscal '20 for North America. .

And then just following on from Peter's question around this -- the changing approach to PDG in North America.

Can you give an idea of like sales force turnover, if anything, and how that's been against your expectations as you push this new approach into your sales force?.

We -- probably the biggest part of the transformation we had was in the interior business. We usually have roughly 80 sales professionals who support the interior business. And majority of them is -- of our team is actually call on to the stores across the country.

And the business model has really changed with the big boxes, and really those decisions to promote and to place products within the -- it's already done in Atlanta or in Charlotte.

So what we did there is that we have to have a -- turnover over half of those folks so that we can reposition the business at the headquarters to really drive the account management.

And then the -- with the head count that we have, then we use that to really hire more of the market development and business development professionals to really go into -- gain new -- convert new business from vinyl into fiber cement.

So that is the shift that we did to make sure that we can drive the demand and then be able to drive the channel growth at the right quants. .

Sophie Spartalis from Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Just following on from both of the questions on the sales force. You talked about key roles being filled. Last quarter, we heard about these hunters and gatherers. Can you just talk about, because that involved I think placement of people in different towns and it was quite a cultural shift.

Can you just talk through how that is going and how much of that process is complete?.

Yes. So just to be clear is that the pull side, which is really the market demand that which Hardie has always been very strong at in terms of create the demand of fiber cement over vinyl, and that is an area we actually reinforced with more capability and more resources so that we can drive that demand. So that doesn't change.

Not only it doesn't change, we just add more resources to it. And we also add more resources into the R&R. And that is an area that also a growth opportunity for us from the demand generation's perspective. Where we enhance the capability of sales team is really create big focus on the account management, the key account management.

And that is where we need the sales professional who really understand how to manage our customers in terms of how to provide the services and capability of James Hardie to our channel partners so that they can make more money selling our products..

And that is a skill set that we continue to add into the company. We -- I think I mentioned 3 -- at the last earnings call that we just hired a new Head of Sales for North America, and he's reporting to Sean Gadd, who is the Chief Commercial Officer.

And he's [ Johnny Jacob ] is his name, and he's the one that now run the total sales organization in North America with a strong focus on account management as well as in the market development. And then within this organization, we built the new organization called sales operations. This is really about the analytics.

This is really about the sales trained and to make sure that we have the right training across. This is about customers -- the inside sales, price management and then so on and so forth. And that is the new capability that we also built within the sales organization. .

Okay. So just in terms of that process, it seems to be still ongoing.

Can you give us some time frame as to when all that will be bedded down and your sales function will be complete to the market?.

We would anticipate within 3 to 6 months. .

Okay. And then just a quick follow-up question, just in regards to Asia Pac, you mentioned in your commentary that the market has peaked. You've got your guidance there decreasing in FY '20.

Can you maybe just talk through how much clarity you've got in terms of your order book here in Australia and Philippines given they're your key markets?.

We don't look at -- we don't have the -- a big visibility out into the order book as we would like. But in terms of how our teams -- we have a team, they're very focused on the primary demand in the marketplace. So they really know what the demand.

And also, we have a very strong team that manage [ indiscernible ] work with our channel which is quite concentrated in Australia quite well. So they do have a good sense of how the markets is moving and more about how do we continue to create more demand of our product through the channel and also at the builders and contractors.

So it is not a science yet, but it's certainly -- there's a good feel for how we are performing against the market..

As you can see, in the fourth quarter, our business in Asia Pacific continued to perform well at 7% growth in volume. And they couldn't get there without the growth in Australia. .

James Brennan-Chong from UBS. Three months ago when we sat here last, we talked about customer perception issues and customer retention problems that you were having. I think at that time, you talked about that was costing about 3 percentage points of PDG.

Three month's on just interested to know how has customer perceptions changed and where you are tracking against that against your expectations. .

Right. I think back then I said that we probably have about 2% to 3% erosion of our sales because we're not really managing that -- our current customers. I think during the past few months, our teams from the top of the company all the way down, that we have reached out to our customers at the -- from the CEO level down and met with them.

And I think that was -- to be able to meet, as top to top and mirror image as a team together. That really helped to reinforce to our customers that we at James Hardie would like to engage in a different level than we had in the past. And that helped.

But of course, just with any customer relationship and management, we have to demonstrate it every day until -- demonstrate with actions every day until our customers really believe that we are -- we really made a change from being a -- a lot more customer-focused now. So it is a journey.

It's not going to be something that you can change people's mind overnight. It is an area as a company that we have to change to be able to get there. .

Right. So I guess the target for 3.5 -- 3 to 5 percentage points of PDG -- sorry, the target this year for 3 to 5 percentage points of PDG doesn't really assume that you get any more traction in terms of retaining those lost customers. There's no improvement. That's upside, is it? Or is there actually some improvement [ indiscernible ]. .

I think, first and foremost, is that least for -- to start that we -- that would help minimize some of the erosion. And then next step is really about grow beyond that. That's a 2-step process.

Any on the phone?.

Any questions on the phone?.

And we have a question from Peter Wilson from Credit Suisse. .

Jack just on North Americas, if I could first just clarify one of your answers to the questions earlier that you said it will 6 to 7 months for [ summer ] initiatives to gain traction and hence, you wouldn't expect growth to be above fourth quarter.

That would seem to imply that in order to achieve a 3% to 5% PDG target that you're going to be -- have to be right at the top end of that range for the second half, right?.

Yes. So we would anticipate that once we get our commercial transformation start to run, that we would see a stronger traction, yes. .

[ That would be the ] exit range, right at the top end of that range?.

In the second half. .

Okay. The last time we spoke -- the last time you reported, you sketched out [indiscernible] 10-year plan [indiscernible]. A big part of that's in the early years were to come from [ indiscernible ] wood.

And [ firstly out of the ] early days, the numbers that you're reporting at -- [ the number ] that you've used in reporting don't really seem to illustrate that.

So I'm just wondering kind of how confident are you on that and if there's any tangible progress that you can point to there?.

Can you repeat that. .

Okay. Just to make sure I've got your question right. You're asking if our -- the commercial transformation that we talked about in February, which showed a gain over the next 10 years along our 35/90 strategy against both vinyl and wood-look alternatives requires required kind of early gains by substituting LP.

And your question is the reported result for LP looks pretty similar to our reported result. So how does that statement compare to the most recent results.

That's the essence of your question?.

Yes. And apologies, I think the first part of your answer got cut off there. But I guess my question is, I mean LP SmartSide Strand reported [ 8% ] volume growth in the third quarter -- sorry, in the March quarter, and on a 12-month basis, was well ahead of the numbers that you've printed as well.

So it just doesn't, I guess, suggest that there's any progress in taking share off engineered wood?.

Well I think if you look at the last 12 months, our -- I think our growth rate between us and LP is about the same, I think about 5%. So having said that, is for us to continue to monitor our 35/90, it is important for us to be able to take more share from LP. It is a -- LP is a good competitor.

So it is going to be a -- about execution of our plan and then continuing to adjust as necessary to make sure that we achieve our long-term objectives. .

Okay.

And just at what point would you start to become worried if those relative numbers don't improve in your direction?.

Peter, I think it's too early to tell yet. .

Okay. And one last one, the Win With Color is a big part of achieving that, and you [ highlighted, say, ] an expanded range of colors. Am I wrong in saying that at the U.S.

Investor Day last year, you outlined the plan to rationalize the number of colors that you are doing in order to improve your supply chain efficiency?.

That's correct. So we did rationalize quite a bit. And then what we offered, what we call the statement line, was at the core products that our customer can order are made to stock and that's just about roughly 15 SKUs. And then the others is about over 700 different colors that our customer can order with us. And that's really about the make to order.

And so that kind of give our customers the capability and the ability to design any type of development that they would like. But it's really about us focused primarily on the 15 SKUs that we sell day in and day out to the market.

And that is where the rationalization and the standardization that would improve our manufacturing efficiency and then -- and translate to cost reduction. .

And we have another question from Daniel Kang from Citigroup. .

Just a quick one. Just in terms of the PDG growth rate, you mentioned that 1% [ indiscernible ] for the full year. Are you able to estimate the exit rate for fourth quarter. And while we're talking about competitive landscape, did notice that the import levels were quite strong into the March quarter.

Are you seeing much impact from the increased import levels?.

Yes. I think the -- our fourth quarter exterior volume growth is about 3%, 3.5% and sort of compare into the third quarter of about 1%. So it's a -- the -- I mean, we don't want to look at really PDG on a quarterly basis because it's not really that exact science, so we kind of look at it from the rolling 12 months.

If you look at the rolling 12 months for fiscal year '19, it's more than 1% -- plus 1% versus minus 2.5% a year ago. And then there's that momentum a little bit coming out of the fourth quarter.

So it's a -- it has -- but in terms of any appreciable step change, it's not going to be materializing until we execute our commercial transformation to the fullest. And then relative to your question on the fiber cement -- go ahead, Daniel. .

[indiscernible].

I think the line is cut off..

[Technical Difficulty].

So I don't -- I'm not actually picking up any of the feedback. .

Yes, no, sorry, no one's speaking. Jack had asked if you had a follow-up question. .

Yes. The follow-up question was just in terms of the increase in input that we've seen in the March quarter.

Are you seeing much of an impact there?.

You want to answer that, Matt. .

On input cost?.

Yes. .

Imports of FC. Yes, I mean we noted the same. No, we're not seeing any sort of significant change in the marketplace. The percent on -- I think the headline number, the percent in growth is a big number. It was like almost 30-something percent. But keep in mind, I'd say the comp that they're comping that off of is actually quite low from a year ago.

So if you look at the import volume over a longer period of time, if you look at kind of where it's been on a quarterly basis over the last, call it, 3 years, it's still at a relatively low volume on a volume basis. It's at a low point in comparison to where some of the other quarters have gotten reported.

So no, we're not seeing sort of anything unusual in the marketplace or anything that's concerning us or anything that we think has got us off strategy or off target. .

Very good, very good. And just also in terms of expectations for effective tax rate [ and CapEx for the full year? ].

You can in August. Yes, I mean I'm not going to guide on ETR for fiscal '20. Once we get a good sense of kind of how the year is going to play out, we'll talk about that in August. I'm not expecting material change. Okay, so it's not like the 14.9% number that we reported this quarter is going to change materially.

It will move up and down, obviously, based on earnings and where those earnings occur. But that's not an artificially high or low number. We think that's a feature of the result going forward. And I'd say similarly on guidance for fiscal '20 we'll talk about that as we normally do as part of the August result..

Oh, yes, for CapEx there's no change in prior guidance on CapEx for fiscal '20. So we expect that we'll spend somewhere around $200 million for fiscal '20. And then we'd think the next 2 years after that, fiscal '21 and '22, will be a step down from that probably closer to $150 million.

We've largely gotten through our greenfield and brownfield capacity projects, we think, across the globe. Obviously, there's other opportunities that we'll explore. Particularly in Europe at some point, we'll add capacity both for fiber gypsum and as the fiber cement business grows.

None of those are sort of included in that medium-term outlook because we don't expect them to occur in that medium-term outlook. So $200 million of CapEx in fiscal '20. And then '21 and '22 is a step down from that, probably around $150 million -- per year for each of those 2 years. .

There are no further questions at this time, I'd like to hand the call back to the speakers for any closing remarks. Please continue. .

No, I think we both thank you all for coming. I think our fiscal year '19 was a solid result for our global business. We're going through a transformation in North America, commercial and our lean manufacturing, which we should expect to see the results throughout the year and fiscal year '20. Thank you..