Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Q2 2022 Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation Earnings Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speakers' presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded.
And I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Yujia Zhai. Please go ahead. .
Hello, everyone. Thank you for joining us to discuss Magnachip's financial results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2022. The second quarter earnings release that was issued today after the stock market closed can be found on the company’s Investor Relations website.
The webcast replay of today’s call will be archived on our website shortly afterwards. Access information is provided in the earnings press release. Joining me today are YJ Kim, Magnachip’s Chief Executive Officer, and Shinyoung Park, our Chief Financial Officer.
YJ will discuss the company’s recent operating performance and business overview, and Shinyoung will review financial results for the quarter and then YJ will come back to provide guidance for the third quarter of 2022. There will be a Q&A session following the prepared remarks.
During the course of this conference call, we may make forward-looking statements about Magnachip’s business outlook and expectations.
Our forward-looking statements, and all other statements that are not historical facts, reflect our beliefs and predictions as of today and therefore are subject to risks and uncertainties as described in the Safe Harbor statement found in our SEC filings. During the call we also will discuss non-GAAP financial measures.
The non-GAAP measures are not prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles but are intended to illustrate an alternative measure of Magnachip’s operating performance that may be useful.
A reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures can be found in our second quarter earnings release available on our website under the Investors section at www.magnachip.com. I now will turn the call over to YJ Kim.
YJ?.
First, as I already mentioned, in Q2, we successfully developed and released our first OLED DDI sample to our new top-tier panel maker outside of Korea. Over the next few years, OLED production in this region of the world is expected to more than double and we are excited about our growing relationship with this customer.
Second, during the quarter, we kicked off development of two new OLED driver IC projects with the top-tier panel maker in Korea. We are targeting to begin mass production in the second half of next year. Third, in our new business areas, we continued to ramp our other OLED products such as OLED TV and automotive.
To date, we have three automotive customers with European automakers and initial mass production remains on track for the first half of 2023.
Finally, our additional 28 nanometer manufacturing capacity in Asia remains on track to come online in the later part of this year and we continue to engage in active discussions with multiple foundry partners for additional capacity for mobile and TV products. In summary, we continue to face challenges in our OLED business.
However, we believe the strategic actions that we are taking to secure additional wafer capacity, together with the recent new panel maker customer and project wins, will set us up for having a strong recovery in 2023. Now, let’s turn to the Power solutions business.
It was another solid quarter for our Power solutions business driven by strong demand for our premium power products, as well as BatteryFET products. Our Power solutions business revenue in Q2 was $63 million, up 11.1% year-over-year and down 2.9% sequentially.
The year-over-year growth was driven by continued strong demand across the board for almost all of our products but particularly for our premium products such as our Super Junction MOSFET, Power IC and IGBT in key end markets like communication, consumer, industrial and computing, all driven by trend in electrification of everything.
Sequentially, Super Junction MOSFET, BatteryFET and Power IC product revenue decreased slightly in line with the slowdown in smartphone, TV and computing applications but was partially offset by growth in Medium Voltage MOSFET and IGBT due to the growing demand for e-bikes and solar inverters.
In our Super Junction product line, we continue to see robust demand from TV, PC power and lighting applications due to increasing energy efficiency requirements. During the quarter, we were also awarded a new design for telecom power and we’re expanding the line-up for server and premium computing markets.
For Power IC, we were awarded five new designs for premium display panels from a large Korean display customer and continued ramping shipments of our boost ICs for solid state disk for servers and data centers. In our IGBT product line, revenue grew 36% year-over-year.
This was driven by accelerating demand and new design wins from the renewable energy markets, particularly solar inverter applications. Our Medium Voltage MOSFET product line achieved record revenue during the quarter due to strong demand and multiple design-wins, particularly in power tool motors and e-bikes.
Our latest generation 200 volt Medium Voltage MOSFET with our advanced trench technology demonstrates much lower on-resistance and fast switching performance with higher cell density than prior generations.
Further, our 40 volt Medium Voltage MOSFET for electric water pump in EVs started mass production during the quarter and we are working on expanding the product portfolio to 60 volt for electric oil pumps, power doors, seats and windshield wipers. During the quarter, we continued to develop and introduce new Power products.
The new 650 volt IGBT provides 30% better current density compared to the prior generation. We are excited about this new product as we continue to see growing demand for solar-based applications because of accelerating global adoption of solar power to reduce carbon emissions.
In summary, we will continue to execute the growth plan of our Power solutions business by strengthening Fab 3 productivity and introducing new products with superior performance and improved cost for new markets, such as renewable energy market.
For Q3, we expect our Power solutions business revenue to be down due to some softness in consumer, smartphone and computing end markets, which will be offset in part by a strong IGBT demand for solar applications. Before I conclude my business summary, I want to say that we feel comfortable about our long-term growth prospects.
Both of our businesses have leading technology and are at the intersection of two major trends. We are continuing to focus on executing our OLED recovery plan in 2023 and continuing our success in Power solutions business. Now, I will turn the call over to Shinyoung and come back for closing remarks and Q3 guidance.
Shinyoung?.
Thank you, YJ, and welcome to everyone on the call. Let’s start with key financial metrics for Q2. Total revenue in Q2 was $101.4 million, down 2.6% sequentially and down 11% year-over-year. Revenue from the standard products business was $91.3 million, down 2.9% from Q1 and down 11.6% year-over-year.
As YJ already mentioned, both the sequential and year-over-year decrease was mainly attributable to severe supply shortages in 28 nanometer 12-inch wafers in our OLED business. Our Power solutions business in Q2 maintained its solid momentum as revenue of $63 million represented growth of 11.1% year-over-year.
Sequentially, revenue declined 2.9% due to slow down in TV and computing applications but was partially offset by higher demand in solar and industrials. Gross profit margin in Q2 was 28.6%, below the low end of our guidance range. This represented a 120 basis point decline year-over-year and 890 basis points sequentially.
The sequential decrease was primarily the result of a couple of factors. As a reminder, our Q1 gross profit margin benefited 200 basis points from a one-time timing mismatch of lower cost 12-inch wafers that was purchased in Q4 last year and sold in Q1.
During Q2, our large Korea panel customer decommitted on their volume agreement due to lower demand for China smartphones. This resulted in an inventory reserve of approximately $4.7 million related to 12-inch display products. We also experienced higher foundry cost relating to 12-inch wafers and unfavorable product mix in Q2.
Had we not recorded the material 12-inch inventory reserve of approximately $4.7 million, our Q2 gross profit margin would have been 33.2%. Turning now to operating expenses. Q2 SG&A was $12.7 million, as compared to $14.2 million in Q1 2022 and $14 million in Q2 last year.
Q2 R&D was $13.4 million, as compared to $12 million in Q1 2022 and $13.3 million in Q2 last year. Stock compensation charges included in operating expenses were $2 million in Q2 compared to $1.6 million in Q1 and $2.4 million in Q2 last year. In Q2, our operating income was $2 million, compared to $12.9 million in Q1 and $1.6 million in Q2 2021.
Adjusted operating income in Q2 was $4.8 million, compared to $14.5 million in Q1 and $9.1 million in Q2 a year ago. Adjusted EBITDA in Q2 was $8.5 million, compared to $18.8 million in Q1 and $12.7 million in Q2 a year ago. Our tax expense for the first six months of the year was $2.6 million.
The income tax expense for the first half of 2022 primarily resulted from a higher-than-expected income tax rate as a result of a combination of the change in Section 174 of the U.S. Tax Code, which requires R&D expenditures to be capitalized and amortized over 15 years and lower projected Korea full year taxable income.
We believe that there is a possibility that the referred Section 174 legislation could be reversed. And if such action were to be successful, our 2022 annual effective income tax rate would be significantly reduced. Net loss in Q2 was $3.3 million as compared with a net income of $9.5 million in Q1 and a net loss of $0.2 million in Q2 a year ago.
Our GAAP diluted loss per share in Q2 was $0.07 as compared with an earnings per share of $0.20 in Q1 and zero in Q2 last year. Our non-GAAP diluted earnings per share in Q2 was $0.23, down from $0.28 in Q1 but up from $0.15 in Q2 last year. There were about 46 million shares outstanding in Q2, calculated on a diluted weighted average basis.
Now moving to the balance sheet. Our cash balance at the end of Q2 was $273.8 million. This compares to $284.9 million at the end of Q1. Accounts receivable, net totaled $59.8 million, an increase of 16.8% from Q1. Our days sales outstanding for Q2 was 54 days and 44 days in Q1.
The increase in accounts receivable, net in Q2 was attributable to the timing of monthly sales and related payments from certain customers. Inventories, net totaled $36.2 million, a decrease of 2.1% from Q1. Our average days in inventory for Q2 was 45 days and 51 days for Q1. In terms of our capital allocation plan, Q2 CapEx was $0.6 million.
For the remainder of 2022 and first half 2023, we are expecting previously planned CapEx related to our Fab 3 upgrades and normal CapEx as well as large foundry wafer prepayments to secure capacity and certain employee costs, including an annual contribution of statutory severance to certain external deposit accounts.
Our current estimate for these major items approximate between $80 million to $90 million. Now, I will turn the call back over to YJ for Q3 guidance as well as closing remarks.
YJ?.
Thank you, Shinyoung. Let me summarize my earlier remarks and then I’ll move on to the third quarter guidance.
The current environment for OLED is very challenging, starting with wafer supply shortage, followed by delays in new customer ramp due to spec changes and a slowdown in the China smartphone market due to extended COVID city-wide lockdowns and a slowing global economy.
However, let me highlight three factors that give us confidence about our business’ long-term growth prospects and recovery in 2023. First, we have successfully sampled the OLED chip to our new panel customer and have begun qualification, and we expect to go to production by the end of the year.
Secondly, we started two new product designs for our Korean panel customer and expect to go into production by the second half of next year. Thirdly, we are also making good progress with getting more wafer capacity for our Display business next year.
As a result, our Board of Directors has reaffirmed its intentions toward the remaining $37.5 million stock repurchase program. We believe the recovery of our OLED business and the continued momentum of our Power solutions business position us well to drive significant accretion and value for shareholders over the coming years.
Finally, the newly activated Strategic Review Committee will evaluate all strategic alternatives to maximize shareholder value. I look forward to updating all of you on the progress of our recovery of business during the upcoming quarters. Now moving to our third quarter guidance.
Our results will be challenged by some of the things I just mentioned and further OLED wafer shortages as well as cost challenges, including labor, due to inflationary pressures.
While actual results may vary, for Q3, Magnachip currently expects revenue to be in the range of $70 million to $75 million, including about $9 million of Transitional Foundry Services, gross profit margin to be in the range of 26.5% to 28.5%. Thank you and now I will turn the call back over to Yujia. .
Thanks, YJ. So that concludes the prepared remarks section of this earnings call. Operator, please begin the Q&A session..
[Operator Instructions] First question, it comes from the line of Suji Desilva from ROTH Capital. .
First question on the Strategic Review Committee. I know you've been through this a few times in the past.
I'm curious YJ, what triggers the formation of the Strategic Review Committee at this juncture, any insight there will be helpful?.
Yes, as we mentioned, we have reactivated Strategic Review Committee and they're responsible for reviewing, considering, exploring and evaluating all the strategic alternatives. And that is to mainly to maximize shareholder value.
And one of their mandates also includes reviewing the company's capital allocation plan and also looking at other active strategic and transitional activities. So I think that is very good to look at all the alternatives, as well as reviewing the company's capital allocation plan. .
Okay.
And then on the guidance of $70 million to $75 million, can you give us a sense of what the mix might be roughly of OLED Display rather than Power and whether the 4Q has an opportunity for Display to recover, or whether that's more of a early '23 recovery there?.
Well as we mentioned that the OLED, we expect to production by the end of the year. And our new foundry is coming on in junction with that. But as we also said, in second half, we also see supply constraints from the primary foundry vendors. So I think I leave it at that, on that -- those comments..
Okay, great. And then last question on the 28 nanometer constraints, they are certainly persisting here. Any sense of when those might be able to kind of come back into a more normal pattern? Any thought there would be helpful. Thanks..
As I said -- made in a remark that in 2023, the allocation seems is very improving. So we are hoping that we can ramp up with the new design and that we mentioned with the new China customer and the two new design in Korean panel maker, so forth..
Your next question, it comes from the line of Raji Gill from Needham & Company..
So YJ just wanted to get some clarity on one of the things you said about the OLED business. You said that there are some changes in the design of the, I guess the architecture or that that's leading to some more issues.
Can you elaborate that? I know there's difficulty you're getting access to 28-nanometer wafers, there's difficulty in the overall end market, et cetera.
But could you elaborate on what's going on the design side? And I guess that would basically prevent kind of a Q4 ramp? And seems like that would be more likely to happen in the first half of next year, if I understood what you're saying..
So, what we said is that we sampled the part in Q2 in June, and the part is fully functional. But in mid-June, we've been notified to change some of the features to meet the current market dynamics, needs of the customer. So we had to redesign and we tape out and we taped in July, and then we expect to sample by end of Q3, which is few months away.
So -- but the good thing is that with the initial chip, which is fully functional, the customer is doing full qualification. So we expect when we sample the new trip, the evaluation and qualification be shorter. So we expect to start shipping towards the end of the year. So I hope that answered your question..
I guess with the new design, is that with your second -- with your new panel customer? Same customer, the other one is the same?.
Yes. This is for the outside Korean panel customer. And there were slight changes in feature, additional feature. So it's -- I would say I can't go too much detail, but it's a minor change we did in order to meet the new market requirements..
And it seems like it's been very challenging to get -- more than seem like, it has been challenging to get 28-nanometer wafers from your existing foundry. That's going on for several quarters now.
With your new foundry that's put in place, are you going to start to shift more capacity over the long-term or medium to long-term over to that second foundry in order to ensure that this situation doesn't occur again, or is at least not as extreme as it has been where the inability to get access to wafers has really put a huge dent on your OLED business in a negative way?.
Yes, so very good question. So to answer your question, the new foundry that is outside Korea, and that is expected to provide about 2x to 4x of what the wafer capacity we got into the '22 over the next few years. This new foundry is aimed to serve non-Korean panel customers.
And at the same time, we are in a good negotiation with our existing foundry as well. And we expect to improve the allocation over the next few years as well..
And Shinyoung just a couple of finance questions if I may, and then I'll step back in the queue. How do we think about the OpEx going forward? The revenue is coming down 43% year-over-year for September because of the big drawdown in OLED, the big drop in OLED.
Are there any changes in terms of OpEx to kind of offset that massive decline in revenue on a year-over-year basis? If you keep the OpEx relatively the same, you're going to be -- obviously you're going to be moving into an operating loss territory. So just any thoughts there.
And then also, I just want to make sure I understood in terms of the CapEx, that the CapEx is going to be $80 million to $90 million in 2022 because of the severance, I am just unclear about that. If you can clarify on those two issues. Thank you. .
Yes. So on your first question, the OpEx side, I mean, if we look at the components of our SG&A and R&D, I mean, the majority of them are fixed costs. So I know that our revenue is coming down. So we are looking through the details of the cost to kind of reuse and try to kind of -- ways to kind of reduce our cost.
But at least for Q3, I mean, it's kind of most of them are already confirmed costs for the R&D materials and the labor. So I don't think that reduction can be that quickly. So at least for the next quarter, probably we have to stand by our previously kind of guided for the quarterly OpEx expenses.
And on your CapEx question, no, what we said was our kind of major cash outflows for the second half of this year and the first half of next year were going to be amounted to $80 million to $90 million, including like various kinds of things. And one of the item was the CapEx.
So CapEx, we said, special CapEx of $8 million earlier of this year and normal CapEx of $20 million. But if you look at our cash flow statement, we've only spent $1.5 million so far. So there's $26.5 million kind of remaining, which is already kind of committed. So that's one part.
And we are -- I mean, this one we need to look at again, but at least for now, we are planning about $10 million to $15 million CapEx in the first half of next year.
And the severance, what I meant was, we are looking for like $14 million expected kind of cash outflow in relation to certain employee-related costs, including annual contribution of statutory severance to certain external deposit accounts to comply with the local labor rules.
And then we are looking for some cash tax payments in the next 12 months amount to $7 million. So if you sum up all of those guys, the remaining portion -- a good portion of the remaining consisting of the kind of securing wafers. So we were talking about the total net cash outflow exposure of $80 million to $90 million for the next 12 months..
There are no further questions at this time. I would like to hand the conference back over to Yujia Zhai for closing remarks..
Thank you, operator. This concludes our Q2 earnings conference call. Please look for details of our future events on Magnachip's Investor Relations website. Thank you everyone and take care..
This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect..