Good morning. Thank you for attending today's Clarivate Q3 2022 Earnings Release Call. My name is Forum, and I will be your moderator for today's call. [Operator Instructions]. It is now my pleasure to pass the conference over to our host, Mark Donohue, Head of Investor Relations. Mr. Donohue, please proceed..

Thank you, and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us for the Clarivate Third Quarter 2022 Earnings Conference Call. With me today are Jonathan Gear, Chief Executive Officer; Jonathan Collins, Chief Financial Officer; Gordon Samson, Chief Product Officer; and Steen Lomholt-Thomsen, Chief Revenue Officer.

All will be available to take your questions at the conclusion of prepared remarks. As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded and webcast and is copyrighted property of Clarivate. Any rebroadcast of this information in whole or in part without prior written consent of Clarivate is prohibited.

An accompanying earnings call presentation is available on the Investor Relations section of the company's website, clarivate.com. During our call, we may make certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable securities laws.

Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, performance or achievements of the business or developments in Clarivate's industry to differ materially from the anticipated results, performance, achievements or developments expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.

Information about the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from anticipated results or performance can be found in Clarivate's filings with the SEC and on the company's website. Our discussion will include non-GAAP measures or adjusted numbers, including organic revenue and adjusted EBITDA.

Clarivate believes non-GAAP results are useful in order to enhance an understanding of our ongoing operating performance, but they are a supplement to and should not be considered in isolation from or as a substitute for GAAP financial measures.

Reconciliation of these measures to GAAP measures are available in our earnings release, supplemental presentation on our website. After our prepared remarks, we'll open the call for your questions. With that, it's a pleasure to turn the call over to Jonathan..

first, it will move us up the value chain with our clients; second, as it is productized, it will provide higher levels of recurring revenue; third, it will expand our market reach with both existing customers and new logos; and finally, it serves as a scaled platform to drive additional, use case-driven innovation and growth.

Second, we have invested in a new pharmacovigilance platform to create a new enhanced regulatory compliance workflow solution. Our life sciences customers are struggling to manage both rising regulatory compliance mandates and an ever-growing volume of data on potential drug safety events.

This new solution will further automate these resource-intensive activities. This will reduce cost and drive deeper insights into drug safety by leveraging our scientific content and real world data. We plan to launch our first 2 products in the second half of 2023.

We believe these 2 investments alone have the potential to increase our revenue growth rates by well over 100 basis points in the medium term. I look forward to sharing more on these and the other elements of our road map to growth at Investor Day.

Before I turn it over to Jonathan, I want to reiterate once again how excited I am to be at Clarivate and leading this great company. It starts with our dedicated global team who go above and beyond every day. I truly believe our future is bright and the best is ahead of us. I will now turn the call over to Jonathan Collins..

Thank you, Jonathan. Good morning, everyone. Slide 13 is an overview of our 2022 third quarter and year-to-date results compared with the same period in 2021.

Third quarter revenue was $636 million, an increase of $194 million compared to the same period last year, driven primarily by inorganic growth from the ProQuest acquisition as well as 1.2% organic growth, both of which were partially offset by a substantial foreign exchange translation headwind as the U.S.

dollar strengthened significantly against primarily the pound sterling and euro. This brings year-to-date revenue to nearly $2 billion for an increase of $668 million for growth of just over 50%.

The third quarter operating and net loss of $4.4 billion is entirely attributed to the noncash goodwill impairment charges recorded primarily for the CPA Global and ProQuest acquisitions.

The drivers of the impairment were deteriorating macroeconomic conditions, such as inflation and rising interest rates as well as the recent sustained decline in our share price.

Adjusted diluted EPS for Q3, which excludes the impact of the impairment, was $0.20, a $0.04 increase over Q3 of last year, bringing the year-to-date to $0.63, a $0.14 increase over the first 9 months of last year.

Operating cash flow was $208 million in the quarter, an increase of $164 million over Q3 of 2021, bringing it to $372 million for the first 9 months, which is an increase of $66 million over the same period last year.

Please turn with me now to Page 14 for a closer look at the drivers of the third quarter top and bottom line growth over the same period last year on a consolidated basis.

When we refined our expectations for the third quarter in early September, we indicated revenue would likely be in the range of $640 million to $650 million as a result of the relative strength of the U.S. dollar and that we expected organic growth of about 3%.

As a result of the shortfall in transactional sales within our LS&H business in the month of September that Jonathan mentioned earlier, organic growth was about 180 bps light of our expectation and about $4 million below the low end of the range.

Our recurring business, both subscriptions and reoccurring revenues, came in right in line with expectations at more than 4% and 2% organic growth, respectively. The shortfall was entirely in the transactional and products and services, which declined by more than 9%, when we expected them to be flat.

When we look at the third quarter top and bottom line growth compared to the same period last year, it was driven by 4 key factors. First, organic growth of 1.2% added $5 million to the top line and $4 million to the bottom line for a profit conversion of more than 75%.

Second, inorganic growth contributed $220 million to the top line and $68 million to the bottom line for a profit conversion of more than 30% on a pre-cost synergy basis. This growth is primarily attributed to the ProQuest acquisition.

Third, cost synergies, net of certain operating expenses required to achieve them, contributed $17 million of incremental profit from carryover savings due to the momentum on the ProQuest cost actions.

Finally, the translation impact of subsidiaries denominated in foreign currencies had a substantial impact in the quarter, reducing revenue by $31 million and profit by $8 million. The profit conversion is lower than normal as the translation impact was ameliorated by transaction gains.

Page 15 illustrates the consolidating top and bottom line results for the 3 segments Jonathan outlined earlier for the past 7 quarters. This historical information was made available in a separate 8-K we filed this morning.

The change effectively bifurcates the segment we previously referred to as Science into Academia & Government and Life Sciences & Healthcare. The A&G segment includes the legacy Thomson products, Web of Science, InCites, EndNote and ScholarOne as well as the ProQuest acquisition.

The LS&H segment now includes the legacy Thomson product, Cortellis, along with the DRG acquisition. And the Intellectual Property segment remains essentially unchanged, including the legacy Thomson product, Derwent and the CPA Global acquisition.

On the left of the page, you will note that the LS&H products have led organic growth at about 6% both last year and so far this year. However, this business is clearly more volatile with double-digit growth in quarters like Q1 of this year as well as quarters that are essentially flat like this past quarter.

This is caused by the lumpiness of the transactional data sales, and we're making the investments to gradually move this business towards a more recurring revenue stream. The IP segment has consistently delivered organic growth around 3%. And A&G, which excludes ProQuest, has grown organically in the 2% to 4% range.

While both of these businesses have a level of seasonality on transactional sales, they're much less variable than LS&H, and we expect further stability in A&G's organic growth as the ProQuest business is included in the metric next year.

On the right of the page, you will note that A&G, prior to the ProQuest acquisition, delivered the highest profit margins. We do expect that as we realize the cost synergies in 2023, the margins in this segment will improve towards the 40s.

IP has steadily improved margins over the past 2 years as the cost synergies from the CPA Global acquisition have been achieved. Our smallest segment is LS&H, and its margins are reflective of its relative size. We believe this change to our segment reporting will provide greater transparency into our operating results moving forward.

Please turn with me now to Page 16 to see how the third quarter profit converted to cash flow. Free cash flow was $140 million in the third quarter, an increase of $120 million over last year's third quarter and $216 million in the first 9 months, which was essentially flat compared to the same period in 2021.

Adjusted free cash flow, which excludes the impact of onetime costs, was up $100 million in the quarter and the first 9 months as the growth in adjusted EBITDA was partially offset by higher interest, taxes and capital spending, all of which are largely attributed to the ProQuest acquisition.

Please move with me now to Slide 17 for a look at our revised full year guidance for this year. As a result of the increasing strength of the U.S. dollar, the divestiture of our MarkMonitor business that closed last week and the volatility in our LS&H transactional business, we revised our outlook for the balance of the year.

We're lowering the midpoint of our revenue guidance by $100 million, and nearly half of this, about $45 million, is due to foreign exchange. We've assumed the U.S. dollar will strengthen another 5% sequentially against the pound and euro in the fourth quarter.

The MarkMonitor sale lowers revenue by about $15 million as a result of excluding this business in November and December. Lowering the outlook for our organic growth rate by about 200 basis points accounts for about $40 million, and about 1/3 of this transpired in the third quarter, and we expect about 2/3 will occur in the fourth quarter.

As Jonathan highlighted, nearly all of this variance in the transactional products and services we deliver within our Life Sciences & Healthcare segment. Given the volatility over the past few quarters, we've opted to provide a quite conservative outlook for this area of the business in the fourth quarter.

We now expect our organic growth rate to be about 2.5% and revenue of $2.63 billion at the midpoint of the ranges. Through strong cost discipline, we expect to maintain our profit margin at the low end of the prior guidance range at about 41%, yielding an adjusted EBITDA of approximately $1.075 billion at the midpoint of the range.

Adjusted free cash flow is now expected to be $525 million at the midpoint of the range for a conversion of nearly 50%. The $100 million decrease compared to the prior guidance is attributed to the lower profit and slightly higher capital requirements. Adjusted diluted earnings are now expected to add $0.80 per share at the midpoint of the range.

Please turn with me now to Page 18 for the drivers of the expected revenue and profit growth for the full year compared to last year. As with the comparisons provided for the third quarter top and bottom line growth, we expect the full year will be driven by the same 4 factors.

First, organic growth is now expected to deliver approximately $45 million of incremental revenue and about $20 million of added profit for a conversion of about 45%.

Second, inorganic growth is expected to contribute an additional $830 million of sales and $250 million of profit at actual exchange rates for a profit conversion of approximately 30% as a result of the ProQuest acquisition on a pre-cost synergy basis.

Third, cost synergies associated with the CPA and ProQuest transactions are expected to add $70 million to profit. And finally, as I just noted a moment ago, we've assumed the U.S. dollar continues to strengthen in the fourth quarter, causing $120 million headwind to revenue and a $70 million flow-through to profit for a conversion of about 55%.

Please turn with me now to Page 19 for more detail on how we expect the full year adjusted EBITDA of nearly $1.075 billion will convert to free cash flow. Our full year outlook for adjusted free cash flow is now $525 million at the midpoint of the range and represents an increase of $65 million compared to last year.

We anticipate the profit growth of approximately $275 million will be partially offset by higher interest to service the debt used to fund the ProQuest acquisition, higher cash taxes on the profit growth and higher capital requirements as increased capital spending will be partially offset by lower working capital This outlook contemplates that nearly $0.50 of every dollar of profit will convert to adjusted free cash flow.

Please turn with me now to Page 20 for a look at how we plan to utilize this cash as well as the proceeds we received from the MarkMonitor sale to strengthen our balance sheet.

In the upper left quadrant of the page, you can see that through a combination of more than $0.5 billion of adjusted free cash flow, more than $0.25 billion of cash proceeds from the MarkMonitor sale and about $100 million of cash on hand, we will pay down about $0.5 billion of debt between the term loans and the revolver, repurchase $175 million of our stock, integrate the ProQuest acquisition, service our preferred stock with a cash dividend and satisfy other minimal obligations.

In the upper right, you will see that this will leave us with $5 billion of debt at year-end, and we expect to utilize a large portion of next year's free cash flow to continue to pay down debt as we prosecute our plan to reduce our leverage to less than 4 turns.

In the lower left, you will note that during the quarter, we entered into an interest rate swap on about $0.75 billion of our floating rate term loan. This action, combined with the anticipated deleveraging in the fourth quarter, will result in a reduction of our floating rate debt from 45% to 25% of our annual coupon.

And finally, in the lower right, you will note 2 important features about our debt stack. First, with the current interest rate projection via the forward curve, where base rates peak at about 5%, our total weighted average cost of debt will peak at about 5.5%, which remains very low by historical standards.

And second, we have no debt maturities or mandatory prepayments for the next 4 years. Please turn with me now to Page 21 for some high-level comments on the major drivers of our top and bottom line trajectory as we approach 2023.

In a few months, we plan to provide specific guidance for next year as well as the time line for accelerating our organic growth from the current levels to the market growth rates.

However, at this point, we want to highlight a few major factors that have developed in the second half of this year that will have a material impact on our outlook for next year. First, if the dollar remains strong as it is today, we will have a significant top line headwind due to FX translation that will be most evident in the first half of 2023.

Second, the sale of our MarkMonitor business will also lower our revenue in the first 3 quarters of next year. It's worth noting that neither of these factors will affect our organic growth. And finally, we do expect organic growth to improve next year as we execute the strategy Jonathan outlined earlier.

However, we do not anticipate the dollar impact of the FX and divestiture headwinds will offset the impact of the organic growth, leaving our revenues relatively flat next year. As a result, our profit margin expansion will be relatively modest next year, aided by the completion of the ProQuest cost synergies, leaving EPS relatively flat as well.

We do expect our free cash flow conversion to nearly double in 2023 as the onetime cash outflows associated with the CPA Equity Plan and the ProQuest integration cost will be behind us.

Please turn with me now to Page 22 for a reminder of why we believe this is a great business that's positioned to generate value for shareholders even during times of economic uncertainty. I want to echo Jonathan's enthusiasm for the prospects of our business, and this page helps to highlight a half a dozen reasons for our sanguine outlook.

Our 3 business segments, A&G, LS&H and IP are replete with mission-critical products full of enriched data, delivering analytics and insights to an expanding range of user personas. We enable our customers' workflows, and we also act as a trusted partner, providing value-added services across a broad range of industries around the globe.

And these products and services are highly recurring in nature. So far this year, 78% of our revenues are subscription and reoccurring in nature and collectively have delivered organic growth of 4.5%.

Our transactional business has been more variable than we would like over the last few quarters, but the investments we are making in new product innovation within our LS&H business will migrate more of the revenues towards recurring sales, providing additional stability and predictability.

Because our products are mission-critical, our subscribers have renewed at 92% this year, which includes a headwind from our decision to suspend our operations in Russia. This demonstrates the sheer resilience of our subscription products.

These commercial attributes provide a solid foundation to drive substantial operating leverage as evidenced in our profit margins, which are in excess of 40% so far this year.

It's important to note that the content, technology and commercial channels that our 3 segments share have led to $0.25 billion of cost synergies over the course of the past few years as we've integrated the DRG, CPA and ProQuest acquisitions. This is a major contributor to the strong profit margins we're delivering.

The onetime cost to integrate these businesses and deliver these cost synergies have created a significant drag on our free cash flow conversion. However, these are now largely behind us. As I mentioned just a moment ago, we expect our free cash flow conversion to double next year to about half of our adjusted EBITDA.

Combining these factors highlight that our business is a scaled information services compounder poised to accelerate organic growth via our refined strategy and deliver outsized returns for our shareholders moving forward. Thank you all for listening in this morning. I'll now turn the call back over to Forum to take your questions.

[Operator Instructions]. Forum, please go ahead..

[Operator Instructions]. Our first question comes from the line of Manav Patnaik with Barclays..

I just wanted to touch on -- Jonathan Gear, you pointed out, obviously, the -- your growth versus the market growth and the gaps. And I know you'll give us more color on the Investor Day. But when you look at your 2023, I guess, implied organic growth, it's improved but still kind of in that 3% camp for next year.

So I was hoping just a little bit more color on how long or how much do you really need to do to get -- to be able to go penetrate that white space. It sounds like maybe '23 won't show that..

Sure, Manav. Thanks for the question. So a couple of comments to your question. First, I mean, we certainly expect and will make progress on our organic growth in 2023, and we'll come out with a very precise number at our guidance call at the end of the Q4.

I think your second part of your question is really the timing, if you will, to the market rates of 6% overall. And it's -- the way we're thinking about it, and again, I will have much more precise views on the timing of this, Manav, and also importantly, the past so that you can best attest your assumptions there.

But I think that will be measured in, I would call it, a few years. And a few could be measured in a couple of type years, think of it in terms of that being the timing. But again, let me come back to you, Manav, at Investor Day with some more precise timing on this..

Our next question comes from the line of Toni Kaplan with Morgan Stanley..

So I wanted to sort of go back to September, it seemed like you had some idea that the quarter wasn't going well since you lowered the guide. I know transactional has less visibility, but I guess, down 9% is sort of a big delta versus flat.

So like, I guess, are you able to monitor the transaction intra-quarter? Or was September really a lot worse than July and August? And just how should we think about 4Q and next year for the transactional business? Like how do you get that to recover, basically?.

Sure. Yes, I'll add my comments and Jon, you can add if I miss anything. So first of all, as I mentioned in my comments, it really came down to really a half dozen very, very large deals.

And we certainly -- obviously, our Life Sciences & Healthcare sales team led by Tom -- we are very involved, myself, Steen, Jonathan are monitoring these on a really daily basis given the size of them. And this really gets to the crux of what I made in my comments, kind of my discovery here being my first quarter on the role.

These are just very hard to predict. They -- and what's interesting is we didn't lose these to competition. They just -- the decisions were delayed. They are postponed. And I've come to realize, this is just the nature of the product, is you have a small number of very large deals that you can feel very good about and they just don't convert.

And it's something that is, I'll say, relatively new to me, Toni, in terms of my experience and is a key for us here. So as we think about next year, I think as I mentioned and Jon also mentioned in his remarks, our view on this is, first, we have to structurally change it.

And the investments which we're making, which I'm incredibly excited about, which we actually okayed and greenlighted before the end of the quarter, I feel very good about what that will do to really smooth out both by adding more value into our clients, so moving up the value chain, as I mentioned, but also really smoothing out the predictability of this important revenue chain.

And then the second piece, as both Jonathan and I mentioned, is given the volatility here, I think the prudent thing to do is just take some of these large deals out of our guidance and out of our view. And the result of that might be maybe we have a couple of quarters where we come in surprise the upside. When that happens, we will call it out.

So you'll have the visibility and know what happened, but that's how we're thinking about it.

Jonathan, anything you'd like to add?.

No, that's great..

Our next question comes from the line of Andrew Nicholas with William Blair..

I wanted to ask on profit margins for next year. I think on Slide 21 and in your prepared remarks, you talked about modest expansion, primarily on ProQuest cost synergies.

So I just wanted to clarify, is the intention or the messaging here that you're planning to reinvest the organic kind of margin expansion that you expect from this business back into LS&H or other growth initiatives? Is that how we should think about next year?.

Andrew, it's Jonathan Collins. As we think about next year, the big things we wanted to highlight were the top line, just to be clear that the FX headwind we're going to see in the divestiture of MarkMonitor will offset even the improved organic growth on a dollar basis.

To your point, when we think about the profit margins, we do believe we'll have some margin expansion. As Jonathan said, when we're out in February with our year-end results, we will give more specifics around that.

With organic growth in the range that it has been, the margin expansion, as a result of that, is not going to be significant, but we will have the ProQuest cost synergies next year that we'll complete, which will help to bolster the margins.

So those are the big pieces that we wanted to point to and highlight for next year as we think about the bottom line..

Our next question comes from the line of Shlomo Rosenbaum with Stifel..

I'm trying to understand a little bit more, what is the impact of removing the large deals from -- of real world data from your guidance? In other words, when I'm looking at '23 over '22, and you're talking about looking kind of flattish, how much revenue are you excluding from big deals that you would normally exclude that could be potential upside? Because I'm trying to get a baseline of what kind of organic growth we're looking at because it seems like you're introducing this kind of conservatism, but it's hard for us to really get a beat on how much revenue are we talking about..

Maybe I'll give a thematic and have Jonathan be specific. So again, the '23 -- we will, of course, Shlomo, come back with more details at the end of the Q4 call.

But thematically -- and a couple of things, and Jonathan will comment on this, we did want to highlight just the impact of some of the -- the big impacts of MarkMonitor, FX, et cetera, in the total revenue numbers.

When we think about this, again, I'll call out, as I mentioned in my earlier comments, well over 95% of our business performed as expected. And so the bulk -- vast majority of this business is quite predictable as you would expect with everyone on this call would expect for a business of this nature.

We do have this one aspect of our business, which can have great quarters and not so great quarters. And so when we look forward next year, what I would expect and maybe I'll just -- Jonathan, you comment on it. And keep in mind, we have not finalized our plans for next year.

But I would expect kind of no heroics whatsoever in our real world data business line for next year.

But Jonathan, do you want to add to that?.

Yes. I think that characterization is fair. And, Shlomo, since we haven't given a specific number for next year, I'm not going to be able to answer it with a lot of detail. But I would point to our guidance for the fourth quarter. What we've effectively done here was saying that Q4 is going to be flat organically.

It's heavily discounted, all these deals. So that's a pretty significant impact in the fourth quarter. That's typically the largest quarter for these deals. So as Jonathan said, as those -- as we hopefully get some of those closed during the quarter, that would provide some upside. But that's how we've approached the fourth quarter.

More details to come on around 2023 when we guide to that early next year..

Our next question comes from the line of George Tong with Goldman Sachs..

I wanted to stick with the Life Sciences & Healthcare transaction revenue performance. You mentioned that you didn't lose any of the deals, the decisions were delayed and postponed.

So can you talk a little bit more about the dynamics of what happened there? Are these truly delays? And were they due to macro factors or other factors that caused the deals not to go through? And then separately, what are you doing to improve the predictability in terms of translating these revenues into recurring revenue streams? Are you looking to restructure contracts and how you go to market? Any color there would be helpful..

Sure. Yes. Let me comment on all those. As I went through my first quarter close, I've learned a lot on this part of the business. So first, let me just kind of describe the nature of some of these larger deals. And if I should mention, we have large deals. We also have a tail of smaller deals on the real world data.

So it's not all -- but what happened is you get these series of larger ones basically not close. And a couple of takeaways, which I'll share with you in terms of my learning.

So first, we -- in some cases, we're going direct to the end user, but in many cases, particularly with these larger ones, we are selling to other data aggregators who themselves are bringing other data sets, other content that they may have or others may have to provide a more comprehensive solution for the ultimate end user.

And so that they're -- they're complex deals. And the key thing, as I mentioned, is very reliant on the timing and specific need of the end customer, which is a moving target. That's number one. The second thing, you asked about any economic pressures. The answer is no.

I don't believe any of these deals were materially impacted based upon what we're seeing in the slowdown of the economy. Maybe a little more governance, if you will, from Boards and whatnot of smaller companies, if they scrutinize this.

But when they need the data they do and if they postpone decisions, then they just postpone the needs for those decisions. So George, I did not see really any macroeconomic pressure on this or really materially in any part of our business. It continues to be a very resilient business as it historically has shown.

Now to the second part of your question, what are we doing about it? I pull back those 2 examples I showed in my prepared remarks. We're building out a platform for real world data and this platform is -- it is the future for what we're doing with this data.

There will always be a need for data, data in its pure form by certain end users and certain customers based upon their use models and requirements and aggregating with other information, and that's great.

But what we're pivoting to now is this creation of a real world data platform, which then creates specific use case-based analytics, and it has a couple of benefits from it. First, it's easier to consume our data, number one.

Second, they can combine our data with proprietary information that the end user may have to really place some enhanced solutions, number two. And the third element, which I know everyone on this call cares about, it becomes much more predictable vis-à-vis recurring type revenues. It will move us up the value chain.

And to me, George, what I've typically seen in my history, that what great information businesses do is they start with core information, and they lay on top analytics insight to create much more. It's higher value, more predictable and sticky content. So that's our plan to continue to migrate and improve this business.

And again, I'll comment, the underlying business is great. The data is must have. The issue we have right now with the real world data is it's just very unpredictable. The investments we're making in productizing much of it will help address those issues..

Our next question comes from the line of Seth Weber with Wells Fargo..

I'm wondering if you could just comment on the pricing environment, what you've seen here in the back half of the year and maybe just what you're expecting for 2023. I think the company had previously spoken to something in the -- like a mid-single-digit growth from pricing.

Can you talk about whether that's still the right way to think about it? And just any kind of early view to conversations for next year..

Yes. Seth, it's Jonathan Collins. On the pricing front, that's one area that continues to perform as we expected. It's been a bright spot for us in the first 9 months. It is one of the key contributors towards the strong subscription growth that's been improving as we've moved through the year. So those conversations have gone well.

We've talked quite a bit about the fact that this is really about an exchange of incremental value. So we've made meaningful investments in the products over the course of the past couple of years, and now we're able to be able to recognize an economic benefit associated with that. As we look to next year, we're cognizant of the overall environment.

We'll be very thoughtful and careful as we move forward in all of these product categories, but we think this will continue to be an area that helps to bolster the strength of our recurring business, which as Jonathan highlighted earlier, has been a real bright spot for us so far this year..

Our next question comes from the line of Peter Christiansen with Citi..

I want to go back to the transactional revenue retooling. I appreciate the comments there.

But I was wondering, have you investigated whether there's parts of that business, particularly the data sales, where you may have the opportunity to repackage the product, maybe introduce it into subscription, maybe at a new tier level or something of that nature? How should we think about product repackaging as a potential means of smoothing out some of the volatility from the transactional business?.

a, being more predictable; b, being stickier; and c, being frankly easier to use, and we frankly control the channel with the end user quite a bit better with that. So we do think it will help with that significantly.

There will always be some ongoing demand for data in its native form, and that's just the nature of the business and the nature of the consumption.

But by productizing and adding the insight and analytics on top of the data to create these new products, it will smooth out the revenue and the growth in the Life Sciences & Healthcare division significantly..

Our next question comes from the line of Stephanie Moore with Jefferies..

This is Hans Hoffman on for Stephanie.

Can you just talk a little bit about the ProQuest integration, kind of a little more specifically, kind of what you're seeing within the Web of Science product and how that's performing relative to your expectations? And then just sort of on divestitures now, kind of MarkMonitor, have you guys sort of pruned on noncore assets? Or is there maybe more left to go there?.

Okay. Sure. So maybe I'll make a comment and have Jonathan Collins come in and add some additional color. So first, on the ProQuest acquisition integration, it's gone exceptionally well. It's always hard.

And one thing I commented when I joined this company a few months ago, the one thing that really struck me was just the pace of change that has taken place, the pace of growth, if you will, driven by acquisitions the last 30 months, and as I've mentioned on previous calls, all during COVID.

Now I think the success of the integration of ProQuest really is a success story within Clarivate. And a lot of credit goes to the teams both on the ProQuest side and the legacy non-ProQuest, Clarivate side who made that happen.

But the ProQuest acquisition has performed well, and we're very pleased with it, both in terms of the top line as well in terms of the efficiencies that we pulled out of it. And the combination of Web of Science from the legacy Thomson business with ProQuest is such a natural combination. It's just -- the content makes sense.

The products make sense together in terms of how we're going to market. Now I do think, and I mentioned in one of my remarks is when I look at the path to grow from our current growth rate to just market at 6%, there are a few legacy Thomson products in particular that we need to improve in, and Web of Science is one of those.

We announced previously some investments being made there in improving our Journal Impact Factor as an example. And we are now leaning in with investments behind Web of Science and other products to help make improvements in those areas. But overall, we feel very good about the progress.

And Jonathan, do you want to add comments on that or talk about other pruning?.

Yes. And as it relates to the ProQuest, the cost synergies continue to run ahead of schedule. So we bumped up the outlook for cost synergies in our full year range that we provided. So continue to do better there and are encouraged by the cost synergies.

On the revenue opportunity side or integrating the products better, as Jonathan highlighted, one of the key product integrations that we've pointed out before is the inclusion of the Web of Science bibliometric data index content into our web-scale discovery solutions that ProQuest has, both Primo and Summon. Great opportunity.

This is driving additional usage and a better value proposition of the product for many of our customers around the world that use those services. So that's a great example of where we're continuing to integrate not only the back office and achieve cost synergies, but create better value for our customers.

As it relates to the portfolio pruning, we've mentioned before, we started with the most obvious. So the work that we did on MarkMonitor, as Jonathan highlighted earlier, this was not the best strategic that we wanted to free up some opportunity.

We'll continue to be careful stewards of the business and look for opportunities to make sure we free up capital to invest as everyone would expect..

Our final question comes from Ashish Sabadra with RBC Capital Markets..

This is John filling in for Ashish. It looks like you're expecting an incremental $15 million in CapEx largely focused on organic growth investments. You've talked about them a little bit, the legacy products.

But maybe could you just give us some more color on the expected benefits and time line? Is this more of a back half '23 or potentially a longer term?.

Yes. You got it. The incremental CapEx that we put in for this year is largely to begin the investments that Jonathan highlighted. So most of those are concentrated in the LS&H business. So we want to get those off and running in the second half of the year this year. So we've greenlighted both of those projects.

We added some additional content licensing that we wanted to bring in that's included there as well to help drive better sales. So I would expect to start to see a benefit from those next year. And then we'll be able to provide some more color, as I mentioned, a bit more specifically when we provide our guide for next year in the first quarter..

Thank you. That concludes our call for today. We appreciate you all joining us. If you have any follow-up questions, please reach out to Investor Relations. Available always to help you. Thank you..

Thanks, everyone..

This concludes today's Clarivate Q3 2022 Earnings Release Call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect your lines..