Good day and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Quarter Four 2022 Pacira BioSciences, Inc. Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speakers' presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded.

I would now like to hand the conference over to Susan Mesco. Please go ahead..

Thank you, Chris, and good morning, everyone. Welcome to today's conference call to discuss our fourth quarter 2022 financial results. Joining me on the call are Dave Stack, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; Roy Winston, Chief Medical Officer; and Charlie Reinhart, Chief Financial Officer.

Additional members of our executive team are here for today's question-and-answer session. Before we begin, let me remind you that this call will include forward-looking statements based on current expectations. Such statements represent our judgment as of today and may involve risks and uncertainties.

For information concerning risk factors that could affect the Company, please refer to the Company's filings with the SEC, which are available from the SEC or our website. With that, I will now turn the call over to Dave Stack..

for EXPAREL, we expect to secure FDA approval in the coming weeks for an enhanced product release assay that will improve our back failure rate, benefit margins and support additional intellectual property protection.

EXPAREL test batches from our 200-liter manufacturing facility in San Diego are underway, and we remain on track for a supplemental new drug application in 2023; our new ZILRETTA fill line is in the qualification phase, we expect this line to improve future quality and yield to support anticipated CRE growth.

For ioveraº, with our new contract manufacturer fully online, we are now seeing lower unit cost and volume expansion, which benefit margins. With expanding manufacturing capacity and improving margins, we are advancing new programs to drive EXPAREL volume growth and expand use in outpatient settings. Starting with patient access.

In October, we rolled out 340B pricing for EXPAREL. Participation in 340B provides the opportunity to expand access to uninsured or low-income patients. These two populations are particularly vulnerable to the surgical gateway of opioid addiction and can benefit greatly from EXPAREL-based, opioid-sparing regimens.

After 17 weeks, we are exactly where we thought we would be with an increase in both 340B and non-340B purchasers and an aggregate 5% discount to our overall net selling price. We believe this program will drive significant volume expansion within existing and naive 340 business representing nearly 10 million EXPAREL-relevant market procedures.

We expect the 340B pricing program to be neutral to slightly accretive to the net revenues by the end of 2023 as we accessed a significantly larger pool of patients and their surgeon providers who want to perform more outpatient procedures. Importantly, 340B will pave the way for us to leverage on the new NOPAIN Act.

This important legislation will mandate CMS reimbursement for non-opioid postsurgical pain treatments in outpatient settings beginning in 2025. NOPAIN was signed into law in December and will provide a reimbursement pathway for nearly 20 million EXPAREL-relevant market procedures, with commercial and self-insured payers expected to follow CMS.

We are actively monitoring efforts to accelerate implementation prior to 2025, either through a technical amendment or regulation. We believe policymakers in Washington, D.C.

will appreciate the urgency for improving access to non-opioid options given the more than 107,000 Americans who died of a drug overdose in the 12-month period ended March 2022, with more than 2/3 of these deaths involving opioids.

NOPAIN and 340B are especially meaningful to hospitals as they continue to migrate lower-margin soft tissue procedures to help hospital outpatient sites.

Both programs will assist eligible health care systems and affording the opportunity to offer non-opioid pain control for these procedures while advancing our mission to provide a non-opioid pain management solution to as many patients as possible while positioning opioids for rescue use only.

We are also supporting significant -- the significant need for opioid-sparing pain management at our Pacira Innovation and Training Centers as well as our infield educational events.

In 2022 alone, our educational programs provided ultrasound-based training to more than 6,000 physicians for select regional blocks with erector spinae, transverse abdominis plane and pectoralis the most highly requested EXPAREL workshops.

Our ioveraº workshops are also accommodating the market's growing interest in long-acting drug-free nerve blocks.

These educational programs for EXPAREL and ioveraº also provide increased visibility to expand ZILRETTA awareness among our customer base of surgeons seeking an alternative for non-opioid, office-based osteoarthritis pain management solutions.

With last month's opening of our second innovation and training center in Houston, we now have more than doubled our capacity to host meaningful education program.

This state-of-the-art facility features a 125-seat adaptive lecture hall, broadcast studio in both wet and dry lab space for cadaver labs and other interactive workshops, as well as advanced ultrasound with artificial intelligence trading software.

In fact, it is the only facility in the United States featuring simulation-based block training with computerized phantoms for user training and scoring. Our EXPAREL growth initiatives are supported by a strong and growing patent estate.

As a reminder, we currently have eight Orange Book-listed patents, and any potential generic would have to successfully overcome each claim within every one of our patents to get to the point of establishing bioequivalence at commercial scale.

With no commercially viable alternative for a long-acting non-opioid postsurgical pain management, we are highly confident that EXPAREL will maintain its well-entrenched position as the branded market leader for many years to come. Outside the United States, we continue to make steady progress.

We recently appointed a new international General Manager, and our team has been further developing the business by securing approval for EXPAREL access from hospital pharmacy departments.

Long wait list for elective surgeries are overwhelming health care systems across the United Kingdom in Europe, and we believe EXPAREL can help improve this dynamic by enabling more rapid recoveries.

In Latin and South America, our partner EuroPharma submitted for regulatory approval for EXPAREL in Brazil in December, and we are now focused on submitting the approval in other countries.

On the regulatory front, last month, we submitted our supplemental new drug application to the FDA, seeking expansion of the EXPAREL label to include lower exterminator block procedures. This time line places us on track for approval in the fourth quarter of this year.

Complementing EXPAREL, ZILRETTA and ioveraº are serving attractive pre-surgical segments of the market. Last month, we held our annual national sales meeting, during which we formally aligned and trained our full 240-person field force base team as a single unit with all account managers now selling all three products in our portfolio.

With this realignment, sales territories are smaller in size, and we are significantly increasing our reach and frequency with a threefold anticipated increase in ZILRETTA and ioveraº sales calls. We also have several value-creating milestones on track for the next 12 to 24 months for ZILRETTA and ioveraº.

For ZILRETTA, we are now promoting safety data showing its advantages for diabetic patients with osteoarthritic knee pain. The data showed clinically meaningful reductions to glycemic spikes and will be presented at the Osteoarthritic Research Society World Congress taking place in Denver next month. Roy will share more on these data momentarily.

For ioveraº, this quarter we are launching new commercial initiatives for the cash pay market following the concept of platelet bridge plasma or PRP and stem cell injections.

This is a large and important lifestyle market for drug-free nerve blocks, which provides immediate pain control that can last for several months for patients who simply want to play golf, walk on the beach with their grandchildren or dance at their child's weddings.

We also recently signed a multiyear deal for ioveraº to become the official non-opioid a management partner of the Ladies Professional Golf Association, or LPGA.

Through this direct-to-consumer initiative, we will be driving awareness of the benefits of ioveraº and how to access the product using commercial broadcast, digital advertising and in-person presence at tournaments in key markets nationwide. Our customers are also using ioveraº for treating pain related to spasticity, which is an on-label use.

We are on track to begin the registration study for the treatment of spasticity around the middle of this year. In spasticity, ioveraº has the potential to be a game changer. There are approximately 10.2 million patients in the United States currently diagnosed with spasticity.

2.6 million of these patients have moderate to severe spasticity, while 42% of these patients have received at least one treatment modality, only 150,000 are currently receiving treatment with a toxin. This underscores the highly dissatisfied market, with current treatment options that are inadequate.

Beyond the advancing label expansion programs for our commercial portfolio, we have an exciting earlier-stage portfolio of new product development opportunities that include PCRX 201, a novel intracellular gene therapy product candidate that produces IL-1 RA for neo-osteoarthritis.

Our preliminary Phase 1 data safety and efficacy data findings were compelling. Importantly, the greatest level of efficacy was observed with the lowest dose. These data will be presented at orthopedic and gene therapy meetings in the coming months. We continue to advance our internal multi-visit liposome pipeline.

Our Phase 1 study of EXPAREL for intrathecal administration continues and is on track for completion this quarter.

We will also initiate Phase 1 studies later this year for our multivesicular liposome dexamethasone formulation and low back pain and a 20-milligram multivesicular liposome bupivacaine formulation as a nerve block or a field block for longer-lasting or chronic pain.

In addition to our internal programs, we have a portfolio of externally sourced innovation that offers us the opportunity to participate in the development of several exciting product candidates addressing pain along the neural pathway while targeting our current customer base.

These opportunities include strategic investments in spine biopharma, Genosense, GQ Biotherapeutics and Cartronics. With that, I'd like to turn the call over to Roy Winston, our Chief Medical Officer, to summarize some more detail on some of the upcoming near-term value drivers from our clinical programs.

Roy?.

Thanks, Dave. This is an exciting time, not only for us at Pacira, but for patients, providers and payers seeking safe and effective opioid-free options for pain management. I'll start with our lower extremity nerve block.

As Dave mentioned, our supplemental new drug application has been submitted to the FDA, and we are awaiting official acceptance, which is expected to come by a standard 74-day letter which will include our PDUFA date. To remind you, the basis of the submission are two Phase 3 studies.

The first study was a single dose femoral nerve block in the adductor canal for total knee arthroplasty, and the second was a single dose sciatic nerve block in the popliteal fossa for bunionectomy. Both utilize the 10 ml dose, which is 133 milligrams.

Both studies achieved the primary and key secondary endpoints of statistical significant reductions in postsurgical pain and opioid consumption from zero through 96 hours when compared to the active comparator, bupivacaine.

These data provide strong evidence for label expansion to include these two new indications and should support a superiority claim for EXPAREL over bupivacaine in the new label.

We believe adding these two additional nerve block indications will significantly extend our reach into surgeries of the knee, media lower leg, foot and ankle, representing more than 3 million annual procedures.

Working with key opinion leaders, we've begun to publish these data to deliver strong evidence in the literature and incorporate them into society practice guidelines to use EXPAREL as a nerve block in lower extremity procedures. We were also on track to begin the pediatric study later this year that is designed to support the expansion of our U.S.

and EU label to include patients from zero to six years of age. We look forward to minimizing exposure to opioids in this very vulnerable population. Turning to ZILRETTA. In March, investigators will present the results of a Phase 2 study of patients with knee OA and type 2 diabetes.

Participants were randomized to receive ZILRETTA or immediate-release triamcinolone and compared glycemic spikes for the two groups. ZILRETTA was associated with a clinically meaningful reduction in hyperglycemia versus triamcinolone, suggesting that ZILRETTA treatment leads to fewer short-term hypoglycemic-related adverse events.

In addition, the ZILRETTA group had significantly longer duration in the target glucose range, which helps improve glucose management, improve patients' well-being and reduce complications and health care utilization.

Remember that approximately 50% of patients being treated for OA knee pain also have type 2 diabetes or are pre-diabetic, which is especially important for those needing repeat corticosteroid dosing or those that have bilateral knee disease. We also expect to initiate a new ZILRETTA label expansion study around the middle of this year.

This includes a Phase 4 diabetes safety study in knee OA and Phase 3 Shoulder OA study. Our shoulder study would position ZILRETTA as the first and only approved corticosteroid for shoulder osteoarthritis.

Both studies will evaluate ZILRETTA versus triamcinolone with the goal of adding a superiority claim to the ZILRETTA label, and equally as important to place ZILRETTA into orthopedic and pain management society guidelines as the new standard of care.

Turning to ioveraº, we are excited about what we are seeing in using ioveraº for the treatment of spasticity itself. As Dave mentioned, treating the pain associated with spasticity is already on label, and we are now educating physician specialists around the value of ioveraº in this setting.

In parallel, we are launching a registration study to evaluate ioveraº as a revolutionary new treatment for spasticity itself. This is based on strong data from the research of Dr. Paul Winston, President of the Canadian Association of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Dr.

Winston and his team recently presented data from his ongoing work in spasticity at the Annual Meeting of the Association of Academic Physiatrists, which was held in Anaheim last week.

Presentations included data from 59 patients participating in an ongoing study evaluating cryoneurolysis as a treatment for upper extremity spasticity, demonstrating progressive functional improvement over a 180-day follow-up period.

Data from three ongoing observational studies evaluating cryoneurolysis for managing upper and lower extremities spasticity were presented to characterize the safety profile of cryoneurolysis. Data from 113 patients demonstrated low and easily manageable side effect profile.

A case study report of a 42-year old male with spastic hemiplegia following a medial cerebral artery stroke, the patient had a 10-year history of physical therapy and botulinum toxin injection therapy.

After receiving ioveraº treatment one- and three-month follow-up showed a highly clinically significant improvement in shoulder movements, elbow and risk extension and ankle dose inflection. The patient also reported immediate pain relief.

We have met with the FDA and expect to kick off our spasticity-label expansion study in the second quarter of this year of 2023. The study will evaluate ioveraº versus [sham] in adult patients, and enrollment is expected to conclude before the end of the year.

Because ioveraº is a 510(k) device, we anticipate a review time line of three to six months, which would place us on the market for the treatment of spasticity as early as the second or third quarter of 2024. We are also planning a second active comparator study in spasticity designed to demonstrate the superiority of ioveraº versus toxic.

It is our belief that iovera can completely disrupt the current spasticity treatment paradigm, bringing tremendous relief to patients and value creation for Pacira shareholders. Lastly for ioveraº, we have completed the study evaluating ioveraº versus radiofrequency ablation as a medial branch block to treat low back pain.

We expect to present these data at a scientific conference before the end of 2023. With that, I'll turn the call over to Charlie for his financial overview.

Charlie?.

non-GAAP gross margins of 76% to 78%. We expect margins to strengthen modestly during the year as sales volumes grow and acknowledge that first quarter margins may be slightly lower than our full year gross margin guidance range due to the late 2022 manufacturing challenges that spilled over into early first quarter operations.

Non-GAAP R&D of $70 million to $80 million, which is consistent with 2022; non-GAAP SG&A expense of $220 million to $230 million, which is also consistent with 2022; finally, stock-based compensation, which is expected to be in the range of $51 million to $54 million.

In summary, despite ongoing macro headwinds, Pacira delivered impressive financial results in 2022 with adjusted EBITDA of $212.7 million for the year and $58.8 million for the fourth quarter and adjusted diluted earnings per share of $2.59 for the year and $0.80 for the [Technical Difficulty].

We remain bullish in our five-year plan with year-over-year top line growth turning to teens once elective surgery market normalizes. Gross margin is improving, modest year-over-year increases in operating expenses and adjusted EBITDA margins that exceed 50%. That concludes our prepared remarks.

I'd like to turn the call over to the operator to begin our Q&A session.

Operator?.

Thank you. At this time, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from David Amsellem of Piper Sandler. Your line is open. You may go ahead with your question..

I just had a few.

Regarding the guidance, can you talk about what that implies? And I apologize if I missed this earlier, but talk about what that implies in terms of the direction of net pricing and just the overall impact of the 340B pricing program and the discounts you're providing? And then secondly, can you talk about what the guide implies regarding new customer adds? You're saying that you're expecting volume growth to drive top line accretion in '23 and beyond.

So I'm trying to get a better sense of what you're baking in, in terms of new customer adds? And then the last question is on the surgical environment, with soft tissue in particular. What's your general view on when you think that's going to recover? Because as you look at the charts, I mean, obviously, it's markedly different.

Do you think there will be some normalization on the soft tissue side in 2023, or are you thinking about it as normalization -- as a longer-term event?.

bupivacaine because it's cheap; and opioids because they consider them free because, they write a prescription and they're filled in an outpatient department or on a hospital -- or I'm sorry, at a pharmacy that is part of Part D.

So when we talk to those folks and say, in and an arrow where there's reimbursement, what will you do? And universally, the answer is I would love to be able to use EXPAREL if I could afford to use it, given the financial structure of my hospital and these procedures that I'm doing given the margin.

So the interesting observation there, though, is when a patient needs soft tissue procedures, if they're not done in a period of time, and we're thinking something in the neighborhood of six months to a year, the only logical explanation we can come up with is that they learn to live with these soft tissue low acuity pain procedures.

Because the numbers would suggest that there's millions of patients walking around out there from these three years of COVID that require soft tissue surgery, and we just don't see that demand in the marketplace, David.

So, I think the pent-up demand in ortho is real because the pain profile is such that the patients need to be treated in order to keep their job and get to work and be able to walk even to church and things like that.

And soft tissue, the only explanation we have is that there's a very high propensity for pain control in these soft tissue procedures, and patients learn to live with it. And the pent-up demand is real, but it is nowhere near apples-to-apples relative to the number of procedures that have not been done over the last three years, if that makes sense..

This question comes from Glen Santangelo of Jefferies. Your line is open..

Dave, I also want to follow up on some of the questions that David just asked with respect to EXPAREL and sort of your outlook. If I kind of go back to fourth quarter, you said in your prepared remarks, right, that you're continuing to outperform the elective surgery market.

And then I think later in the remarks, you seem to suggest that volume grew 6% in the quarter in a flat surgical market.

Did I hear that correctly with the offset in 4Q, maybe being some of the pricing differences on the 340B program, in particular, that you talked about? Is that a fair assessment of what happened in 4Q?.

It is, Glen. Yes..

Okay, perfect.

So then if we go to your guidance for 2023, you're sort of forecasting 7% growth at the midpoint, which would that imply sort of low double-digit, sort of volume growth, with a similar type of pricing impact? And I'm not sure embedded within those assumptions, what you're expecting for the overall surgical market based on that assumption..

Close, Glen. The difference between what you just outlined in our guidance is the price increase. Remember in early January, we raised the price of the 10 ml by 8% and the 20 ml by 3%. And so, what you said is absolutely correct.

If you understand that there is a roughly 3% net benefit to us as the price increase, then that comes back down into the 7% -- 7% to 8% range, which is what we were trying to do is guide to what actually happened in '22 thinking that the only thing that it would be conservative guidance, of course, based on the 2022 data.

And if our assumption is that the primary reason that the market is -- the macro environment is negatively impacted by inflation. And if that changes, then this would be a conservative guide, which is what we were trying to accomplish..

Perfect, okay. And maybe just my last question regards -- it relates to the competitive landscape. And you sort of touched on bupivacaine and maybe some of the fact that some of the opioids are free to some of these surgery centers.

And could you sort of comment on the pricing difference between EXPAREL? And if you think that's having any sort of impact on overall utilization, do you feel like it's a pricing issue? Or do you think it's just sort of a macroeconomic issue and just overall surgical volume issue?.

Thank you, Glen. That's a three-credit course. So in the hospital, we're in the DRG environment, and that's not going to change. I mean, when I raised that issue in our Washington D.C. discussions that is the third rail of the Democrats as it relates to health care.

And they won't even discuss providing anything for one-off reimbursement inside the surgical bundles. That's for inpatients.

For outpatients where we had the ASC, as I commented with David, the benefit of that is largely muted by the fact that the insurance carriers saving 30% to 35% on the cost of a procedure are utilizing the vast majority of the ASC capacity with these high-margin procedures like joints and spine and things like that.

In the middle there is the soft tissue procedures that are difficult to do given the reimbursement in the inpatient market and are more appropriately done in the outpatient market, given the improved cost structure of a hospital outpatient department.

But there are many, many hospitals across the United States, especially in indigent areas and low economic areas, where they can't afford to use anything but the cheapest things that they can buy and there is no reimbursement. So -- and I talked to many of these folks myself.

And so, the importance of 340B, Glen, is to start those folks down the -- to have an opportunity at a reduced price to be able to use EXPAREL in that environment to achieve our mission of providing an opioid alternative to as many patients as possible.

There are still places, many of them here in rural Florida, where they still can't afford EXPAREL even at the 340 price. So, it is absolutely driven by price in this environment. And that's why the NOPAIN Act is so important.

So, the NOPAIN Act will force CMS, and there is a convergence there of these poor patients being largely under some form of social services, so this is the right patient population.

But when CMS is forced to reimburse for non-opioid pain medicines in these -- for these patients in these rural settings, we expect that you will see a very important inflection for EXPAREL. Because in that soft tissue rural market, it is absolutely cost that is a ceiling, basically, on surgeons' use of the product..

This question comes from Gregory Renza of RBC Capital Markets. Gregory, your line is open..

Congrats on the progress. Maybe just a few for me. Maybe building on the prior theme as well.

Dave, I know you touched on this a little, but could you just comment about your approach to the organic price increases with respect to EXPAREL? How are you strategizing about that, especially with maybe more patients coming online? Do we kind of think about it as in line with historicals? Or are there other considerations that you and the team are considering?.

Yes. Thanks, Greg. Well, I think we can go back to -- just to January, and I'll use that as the basis of an answer to your question. So, their 20 ml is the effective dose for many of the procedures that we've historically treated.

And the trials that Roy outlined for lower extremity nerve block, where we expect to be launching that in late this year and early next year, both the 96-hour reduction in pain and opioid consumption for both of those trials was achieved at the 10 ml dose.

One of our fastest-growing areas, frankly, in our current business is in oral maxillofacial surgery. And largely, that is 5 mls per tube and you end up with a lot of these extractions also being a 10 ml dose.

And in many of the pediatric procedures that are being done, not these very large abdominal and orthopedic procedures, but many of the more soft tissue kinds of procedures, we also see a 10 ml dose. So, we see a basket of surgical procedures where 10 ml is the procedural dose.

And we are getting several days of pain control and reduced opioids with 10 mls. And so, the first line of strategy here was to close the gap between the 20 ml and the 10 ml because, in different surgical procedures, you can achieve the same results with half the dose, right? So that was the broad strategy, if you will.

Your question is a very interesting one as we go forward from here. As we achieve TRICARE, and as we achieve NOPAIN, our outlook is that something like 75% of our total addressable market will be reimbursed by 2025. And so, we've made the statement that we expect to be consistent with CPI targeted kinds of price increases.

We don't intend to raise the price by 40%. There are some other models in this space that suggest that things don't go well. We should take that approach. And so we expect that we would have a CPI type of increase as we go forward. That's for EXPAREL.

For ioveraº, Greg, even more importantly, I think, is we are working hard to improve gross margin, which gives us more strategic runway as we try to help more patients.

And our ability to lower the price on -- or lower the COGS on ioveraº as we go into stellate ganglion blockade in spasticity and some of these things, the competitive opportunities are priced in the thousands of dollars.

Our intention is to continue to price ioveraº around $500, so that we can help all of these patients who are in really desperate straits, given the poor choices that they have for any kind of pain control in any kind of treatment of their afflictions. So I hope that answers your question.

But I don't expect that we're going to go crazy when we have reimbursement. I think we'll use CPI directed and trying to be fair to our shareholders by offsetting any increases in our annual merit increases to our employees. But I don't think you're going to see us take advantage of this in an inappropriate way.

I think we'd rather sell more and lower the COGS and improve the gross margin by selling every vial we can make when we have two 200-liter facilities online. And when we believe that we can sell, we can make. As we go into 2024, our forecast suggests that we can make over $2 billion worth of EXPAREL.

And so, if we can get margins into the mid-80s, I would much rather sell every vial we can make than raise the price in any kind of a way that might be inappropriate, given our mission..

Great. That's really helpful. Maybe just one last quick one and helpful to have you and lay out the lower extremity and sNDA.

I'm just curious how you're thinking about prospects for an AdCom? Are you preparing for one? What is the likelihood there?.

Yes. No, and I'll comment and see if Roy has any different idea. Now the p-value here, Greg, there's no -- I mean the data is, I should say, astonishingly positive. But in my mind, the data is astonishingly positive given it's a 10 ml dose and the comparator was bupivacaine.

So 0.007 for both pain control and opioids with a 10 ml dose for the adductor canal and 0.001 for the foot and ankle that was on bunionectomy trial, but it's a popliteal block in the -- I'm sorry, it's sciatic block in the popliteal portion. And that also was a 10 ml dose and the 0.00001 was both for opioids and pain control.

So, I don't -- not getting [indiscernible] share here at all, but we filed this in January. We're moving along in the regulatory process. We'll get our 74-day letter here relatively soon.

I don't see why there would be anybody that would say that they need help from the medical community, providing guidance on whether this is a useful agent in the marketplace or not.

Roy, if you have any different ideas?.

And I'll just add one thing to that, Gregory. The other studies that we've always submitted for NDA, sNDA with EXPAREL have always been against a placebo comparator, right? And this time, we went against bupivacaine, and we demonstrated superiority to bupivacaine in two studies. So, we're actually asking for a superiority claim in the label.

And I think that one of the criticisms we've had -- and keep in mind, the FDA originally asked us to go against placebo when we first started. But people say, well, how come you don't go against an active comparator? Well, here, these -- both of these studies went against an active comparator.

And like Dave said, it was only a 10 ml dose instead of the 20, and it demonstrated such meaningful clinically, meaningful reductions and statistical significance. I think we're always prepared for an AdCom, but I do feel like the chances of it are extremely low..

This question comes from the line of Oren Livnat of H.C. Wainwright. Your line is open..

Really appreciate you returning to guidance. A couple for me. Firstly, on the EXPAREL guidance, I noticed you said global sales for that. And I'm wondering if you can help quantify sort of the significance of ex-U.S. sales in 2023. And then on 340B, I appreciate your commentary about the, I guess, neutral to slight revenue accretion by end 2023.

And I just want to understand that, does that reflect sort of steady uptake already that's begun eventually sort of surpassing that effective price decrease by year-end? Or is there a lag that we're still seeing and as expected, between the initial price increase and even beginning to see uptake in new customers or uptake in existing customers such that maybe in 2024, do you expect acceleration on that front with 340B? Or do we have to wait for NOPAIN to kick in, in 2025 ostensibly to see that acceleration?.

Yes. So, the EXPAREL sales ex-U.S. are not significant in 2023. It is -- we are doing well and it is increasing quite rapidly on a percentage basis, but it is not anything that's going to be material to the 2023 numbers.

Important as we go forward, but in 2023, we're still putting the pieces in place and going through the formulary process and teaching people how to use the products effectively. Interestingly, there is a great deal of interest in ioveraº in Europe, and we're training many of the high-end spasticity folks across Europe.

Paul Winston is going over there regularly now and training these folks. So Europe will be important, but 2023 is not material. You've got all of the pieces for 340B.

So, we have a list of people who are currently purchasing EXPAREL, and we forecasted off of that list how much of that business would convert to 340B pricing, and that's where the 5% comes from.

And then as these new places come on board, we see that the volume, the total volume increases, which will help gross margin, especially as we bring new places online, but the ability to address these folks and have folks in these -- these are 340B hospitals that never purchased EXPAREL before, and they are just starting to come online in a material way.

And so we expect that, that will grow as we go through 2023. And so most of the action moving from 5% to something that approaches neutrality will be back-end loaded as we get into the second half of the year..

On gross margins. I guess some of these issues have persisted a little longer than at least I had modeled through year-end. And I guess you mentioned a little bit of spillover.

Can you just characterize how conservative your 2023 gross margin guidance is on that front? Are you leaving a little room for continued batch failures that may be now that you've had to be a little more conservative? Or are you assuming totally smooth sailing in that guidance and it's entirely sort of sales and volume based?.

Yes. No, we are not forecasting total sale, for sure. What we see, there's a couple of things here. We mentioned this new in vitro test that we will get approved.

We've had some issues where the current test in the soon-to-be removed test or replace test was actually causing us to reject lots that were good based on some variabilities in the test method. And then all of the things that we're associated with our inability to access supply are not currently -- we're in good shape.

We've got everything we need to make EXPAREL. So remember, Oren, that we bet in the late 70s before. So in our view, without some of these one-off things that were driven largely by the pandemic and the supply issues, we're really talking about going back to something that looks more normal to where we were before the pandemic.

So we've been in the late 79% to 80% range before. We're thinking that we get partway there as we go through this year and then we pick up the rest of it once we get more volume coming online..

This question comes from the line of Andreas Argyrides of Wedbush. Your line is open..

Congrats on the progress. Just on -- a couple on the NOPAIN Act here. So what are some of the ways that the implementation of the NOPAIN Act would be pushed up to 2024 from '25? Just trying to get a sense of the likelihood that this would occur.

And then how are you thinking about this -- EXPAREL being included in the act into perpetuity measures for the three years. And then I have some follow-ups..

Yes. So, the original bill as it was going through Congress had a 2024 start date. And so, we've got patient advocacy groups that we've got folks that represent us on the lobby side of the aisle.

And we are actively working with a number of patient advocacy groups who are the -- would be the primary beneficiaries of non-opioid treatment therapy for the low socioeconomic ladder and the disadvantaged and working hard going to Congress.

Now, it is possible that the House could have a technical amendment and would push the start date forward to 2024. It's also possible that CMS, in their normal rule-making process, would take everything that has currently been approved for 2025 and move it forward to 2024, and we are actively involved in those discussions.

In fact, we will be in Washington next week. And so the starting point, Andreas, is the 107,000 folks who died of a drug overdose. There's different ways that this can be established. We're talking to folks about -- can we think about approving a 2024 start for folks who currently have a C code or a J code and approving them for 2024.

And then if you need more time for new folks who might be reimbursed make that a 2025. But those -- those are the things that we're working on right now in real time.

I don't know how to handicap that, other than the chance there's a better than a zero chance that we're going to have a positive outcome here, but that's the best I can tell you as we sit here in February. On the extension, I mean, you guys probably know Chris Christie is on our Board.

And what Chris said to me when we were talking about the timing here is that the government never takes anything that's working back. So, we have a -- what was in the bill was a five-year horizon. It was trimmed back to a three-year horizon.

I would tell you that we're pretty comfortable with that, given the fact that we think that this is going to be a major change and improvement in health care, and that will be very, very difficult for the government to take this back after three years, but we'll find out. We're pretty good at working with them too, to show them the benefits.

We've been able to maintain the ASC reimbursement now since 2018. So, I think we know how to do all these things with the right people representing us in Washington..

Okay, great. And then just a follow-up on lower extremities.

To what extent would the results from the STRIDE study be factored into the FDA here?.

The data is included. The question is, yes, it's a compilation of both, Chris. The STRIDE study, while it missed its 24-hour endpoint, was the first indication that we had, that we had a p-value of 96 hours.

So the difference here in demonstrating even a larger data set to the regulators is that if you take care of the front end, and you use the standard of care that addresses pain in the first 12 to 24 hours, that we can extend the duration here. And that's what the whole strategy was around the clinical program.

So, we will include both of these data sets and the package that goes to the FDA..

The other thing too is in the STRIDE study that those patients all had a general anesthetic. So when they woke up and actual takes a little longer to set up than the bupivacaine comparator they had. And we never positioned EXPAREL ever as something to help you during the surgery, right? It's really for postoperative pain management.

So that's why we evolve the next two studies to be patients having regional anesthesia for the surgery, which is really the standard of what's practice out there today.

If you're having bunionectomy, ankle or a total knee, most of those patients are being done with regional anesthesia for the anesthetic, little sedation along with it and not a general anesthetic.

So, I think when you look at the STRIDE study days two, three, four, we demonstrated, again, not the primary endpoint, but we did demonstrate really meaningful pain reduction that was superior to the active comparative bupivacaine for 24 to 96 hours, if that makes sense..

Our final question today comes from Greg Fraser of Truist Securities. Your line is open. Please go ahead..

On spasticity, can you talk a bit more about the design and size of the registration study? Will that study include [indiscernible] or will that not come until the later study? And then on the gross margin, can you quantify the impact this year on the guidance from 340B pricing or discounting program? And how much growth do you need to see in volume over time to get to your longer-term target of mid-80s?.

I'll start, and ask Greg or ask Roy to pick up the spasticity issue. So on the gross margin, the -- so I mean, we've given the answer in a different sort of positioning. So the -- well, the 340B has no impact on gross margin at all. It's on net margin, right? And so, what we see over time is more volume from 340B and more volume from NOPAIN.

And the ability to get the 200-liter facility in San Diego approved for commercial scale at -- sale at the end of this year, Greg, gives us the opportunity to have two 200 liters.

And the gross margin from those two facilities is significantly better than the gross margin opportunity longer term with the 45-liter facilities that we're currently making the product on. So best in Swindon in the U.K.

with a variable cost environment, improved, but not as great an improvement when we go to San Diego where we have a fixed cost environment. But both 200 liters will allow us to improve gross margins. So that is a piece of it. It's both the volume and the gross margin enhancement that allows 340B to be a viable opportunity for us.

And if you look at the procedures, about 20% of the 340B procedures have flipped [two] 340B from current customers. So the new customers that the 340B helps us with the gross margin and the increased capacity once we can make $2 billion worth of EXPAREL, the price increases on an annual basis allow us to offset these discounts.

And so, that's why as you look towards the end of next year, the new business from these 340B customers and the expansion in volume at the gross margin line allows us to start to address -- to come up on neutrality as we come to the end of the year.

It's a very complex formula that we used in order to assimilate all of these different pieces, but also don't lose sight of the fact that having all of these additional surgeons using EXPAREL and these previously naive EXPAREL accounts is a really important aspect of our NOPAIN strategy.

You could probably assume from this that when we did 340B, we had some pretty good feelings that we were going to be successful with NOPAIN. So, this is one big opportunity for us to increase margins by increasing capacity and then increasing the number of patients who have an opportunity to get these no-opioid treatment strategies..

Thank you. That concludes our Q&A segment. I'll now turn the call back over to Dave Stack, Chairman and CEO, for closing remarks..

Thank you, Chris, and thanks to everyone on the call for your questions and time today.

As you can see, we're making steady progress and expect to deliver on a variety of value-driving milestones over the next 12 to 24 months as we grow product revenue, advance our clinical pipeline to expand product offerings, improve gross margins, increase cash flow and strengthen our balance sheet.

The need for non-opioid pain management remains a global imperative. And as Pacira further solidifies its leadership role in this important work, we expect to have significant market opportunities and growth in the years ahead. We look forward to keeping you updated on our progress. Next up for us is the Barclays Conference in Miami.

Thanks all, and stay well. Goodbye..

And thank you for your participation in today's conference. This does conclude the program. You may now disconnect. The conference will begin shortly..