Martin Gilkes - VP, IR Chris Sinclair - CEO Richard Dickson - President and COO Kevin Farr - CFO.

Drew Crum - Stifel Felicia Hendrix - Barclays Arpine Kocharian - UBS Investment Bank Tim Conder - Wells Fargo Securities Linda Bolton-Weiser - B. Riley and Company Gerrick Johnson - BMO Capital Markets Jim Chartier - Monness Crespi Hardt.

Presentation:.

Good day ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Mattel, Incorporated Second Quarter 2016 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants’ lines are in a listen-only mode to reduce background noise, but later we will be holding a question-and-answer session and instructions will follow at that time.

[Operator Instructions] As a reminder, today's conference call is being recorded. I would now like to introduce your first speaker for today; Martin Gilkes, Mattel's Vice President, of Investor Relations. You have the floor, sir..

Thank you, operator, and good afternoon, everyone. Joining me today are Chris Sinclair, Mattel’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; Richard Dickson, Mattel’s President and Chief Operating Officer; and Kevin Farr, Mattel’s Chief Financial Officer. As you know, this afternoon we reported Mattel’s 2016 second quarter financial results.

We’ll begin today’s call with Chris, Richard, and Kevin providing commentary on our results, and then we’ll take your questions. To help guide our discussion today, we have provided you with a slide presentation.

Our discussion and our slide presentation will reference non-GAAP financial measures, such as gross sales, adjusted selling and administrative expense, adjusted operating income, adjusted earnings loss per share and constant currency. Our earnings release also includes non-GAAP financial measures.

The information required by regulation G regarding non-GAAP financial measures is included in our earnings release and slide presentation. And both documents are available on the Investors section of our corporate website, corporate.mattel.com.

Before we begin, I’d like to remind you that certain statements made during the call may include forward-looking statements relating to the future performance of our overall business, brands and product lines.

These statements are based on currently available information and they are subject to a number of significant risks and uncertainties that could cause our results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements.

We describe some of these uncertainties in the Risk Factors section of our 2015 annual report on Form 10-K, our 2016 quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and other filings we make with the SEC from time-to-time, as well as in our other public statements. Mattel does not update forward-looking statements and expressly disclaims any obligation to do so.

Now, I’d like to turn the call over to Chris..

Thanks, Martin, and welcome everyone. I would like to thank you for joining us. Today I’m going to lead things off with a brief perspective on the quarter and the full year, and then Richard and Kevin will each provide some additional details. And as usual, as Martin indicated, we will open things up at the end for any questions that you might have.

So let me begin by saying that overall we’re very encouraged by the quarter, which reflected some continuing progress on our turnaround, and importantly kept us on track to deliver on our challenging 2016 topline objectives. We also made good progress against our cost reduction goals, both in cost of goods and in SG&A.

As you know, our biggest executional challenge this year is the offset the loss of Disney Princess. And despite continuing foreign exchange headwinds, our Q2 and first half results show that we have made great strides in this area. We continue to see positive and improving trends globally in our consumer takeaway.

And our shipping is aligning with this favorable trend. Encouragingly, we’re also seeing some very solid performance in some of our key programs, with a strong uptick in Barbie and continuing strength in Fisher-Price and Hot wheels.

We are also gaining some excellent traction in our Toy Box with our games and entertainment properties and with megabrands. Now supporting these favorable trends, our focus on strengthening our brands with more effective positionings, advertising, and more competitive pricing and our rapid push in emerging markets is proving successful.

We’re also executing well and we’re doing so broadly across much of our customer base.

In addition, we are quite gratified by the continued strengthening of our licensing partnerships, exemplified by our recent announcements with Universal on Fast And Furious and the Jurassic World franchise, both of which will give us some excellent opportunities to accelerate growth in 2017 and beyond.

Now as for the middle of the P&L, we also made good progress this quarter and we do remain on track to deliver on our cost targets. Our work to streamline and prioritize SG&A spending is progressing well. We’re also capturing some significant supply chain efficiencies and cost savings.

The offsets of course continue to be negative foreign exchange and unfavorable shifts in our brand mix, which are pressuring our gross margins. We expect these factors to remain a challenge as we navigate through the balance for the year. Kevin is going to provide some more perspective on both of these subjects shortly.

So to sum up the quarter, it's a very good progress and on many fronts, and particularly against the difficult backdrop, and some strong external headwinds.

Looking ahead, the picture for the year is largely the same as what we’ve previously outlined, with perhaps a few moderate puts can takes, and our momentum is setting up extremely well for the future. We expect the year-to-date positive trends in POS and shipping to continue.

And we expect to see improving flow through on many of our cost savings initiatives. We also expect foreign exchange impacts will begin to moderate somewhat, offset partially of course by mix, which will remain a challenge.

So overall, our strategies are gaining traction and are helping us to drive the topline to right size our cost structure and to fund investments in brand building, commercial excellence and emerging market expansions. We’re also managing our balance sheet well and we’re continuing to fund our dividend.

So in summary, I remain optimistic about the year. But with the bulk of the year still in front of us, I do want to urge a little bit a caution as we still have a lot of work to do. With that as the setup, let me turn things over to Richard, who is going to highlight some of our topline progress and our core initiatives.

Richard?.

Thank you, Chris. So as Chris mentioned, this year we have both the challenge of overcoming a significant revenue gap, and the opportunity to position Mattel for growth in 2017.

The Q2 results and the effectiveness of our execution throughout the first half of the year are demonstrating our ability to do both, excluding the year-over-year impact of Disney Princess.

Global POS is up mid-single digits for the quarter and year-to-date, with solid results across the majority of our brands and comparable sales in constant currency are up high-single digits for the quarter and year-to-date.

We have almost completely offset the year-to-date Disney Princess shortfall, reflecting strength across a number of brands, licenses and geographies. This performance is significant in many ways, indicative of our ability and potential to further build momentum into the second half of the year.

So let me briefly touch on some specifics, starting with our core brands. We are pleased with Barbie’s reassurance with global sales and constant currency up 24% in the quarter and up 11% year-to-date.

This is the result of a return to the fundamentals that make this brand continuously relevant, including a clear and motivating positioning that is inspiring to girls worldwide, very effective execution throughout the organization and growing momentum, fueled by increasing cultural significance. Consumer confidence in the brand is increasing.

This is evidenced by continued enthusiasm for the new fashionista line, the I Can Be Content Marketing, the success of our new younger girls’ segment Dreamtopia, stronger brand equity scores, and a sharp uptick in pop culture references to Barbie. Retailer confidence is also up, demonstrated by increased shelf space.

And licensor confidence is building as we renewed our Barbie content distribution agreement with Universal in the quarter. The entire Mattel organization took on the challenge to reset the story brand and has made tremendous strides in a very short period of time. And with the Barbie team now set up in running, we are obviously gaining traction.

In the back half of the year, you’ll see us build on Barbie’s success across the Board, as well as deepen the brands connection with moms worldwide. Fisher-Price, with a renewed emphasis on the early childhood development, continues to grow, with global sales in constant currency up 6% in the quarter and 7% year to date.

Brand progress is largely the result of a concerted effort to build strong valuable relationships with parents worldwide, rooted in great product and motivated brand values. We’re building on the momentum of the largest Fisher-Price Segment Baby, by engaging with moms in innovative and meaningful ways in the digital space.

The brand’s very successful Film By You campaign will be enhanced by our new gold medal moments initiative in the fall. In product, we continue to emphasis innovation, creating developmentally forward ideas like our hit Code-a-Pillar for a vast and growing segment of parents who are eager to expose stem learning early on.

We’re building fresh momentum in our Fisher-Price friends line, driven in part by new Nickelodeon licenses. Hot Wheels. Hot Wheels POS and shipping trends continue to be very strong with global POS up double digits year-to-date and sales in constant currency up 9% year to date.

We expect to build on this in the second half of the year, with new and exciting products, some of which, we’re previewing this week at Comic Con.

And while we continue to build a strong component of the business with our DC Comic, Marvel and Star Wars license, the success of our basic car and playsets should more than offset challenging comps going into the fall. Thomas POS also continues to be strong, with global POS also up double digits in the quarter and year-to-date.

Brand strength, particularly in key emerging markets should continue as we introduce twelve new charters later this year.

This impressive new line up of culturally diverse characters is the most significant evolution of the brand in quite some time and will create excitement, global relevance, enhance collectability and numerous other opportunities for the brand. Monster High, as you know has persistent challenges.

Nevertheless, Monster High remains the number two doll brand worldwide and a brand with strong consumer engagement. We’re seeing some success with new product offerings and scales that are expanding play times; shelf space challenges unfortunately offsetting new gains but we’re working hard to capture those spaces.

We’re looking to reboot this brand in the second half with new entertainment and product offerings that emphasize the core characters and the origin story. With American Girl, we have strategic plans in place to rejuvenate the brand and achieve its full potential.

With these plans focused on the second half, we’ve not been surprised by the brand’s year-to-date performance, where reduced promotions and a shift in spending to the second half negatively impacted sales as we expect a better return on the spending in the second half.

The first of these new major American Girl brand initiatives is our recent introduction of WellieWishers. We are encouraged with the results so far. While WellieWishers provide an opportunity to expand the American Girl experience to a younger girl, we remain committed to older girls and will launch our latest historical character Melody, this August.

Look forward to a lot more news regarding American Girl and will be coming out this quarter and next and we're excited about the strategies in place to provide new ways for girls and their families to engage with the brand. Now moving on to Toy Box.

Licensing is demonstrating continued strength, particularly our Warner Brothers partnership which will benefit from this week's release of Batman versus Superman DVD, as well as expanded distribution of our successful DC Superhero Girl line.

As Chris mentioned, Mattel is now a key licensing partner with NBC Universal for their Fast and Furious and Jurassic World franchises, which will begin to roll out next year. These are exciting wins for us and we believe that this is only the beginning of a much bigger partnership with Universal going forward.

A major focus of our Toy Box capability is developing innovative and insightful category expertise to accelerate brand growth, and we are thrilled with the growth Toy Box is driving for our construction brand MEGA, as it gains scale globally. MEGA sales in constant currency are up 22% in the quarter and up 42% year to date.

MEGA has proven to be a strategic driver of organic growth, expanding play patterns for many of our brands, notably Monster High and American Girl, and we will continue to mine the great potential in MEGA going forward. Invention and brand creation are our other key priorities at Toy Box, and these are areas emphasized in the last year.

Our latest invention is a new brand called My Mini Mixie Q's; a highly differentiated execution into the growing mini collector figure market that demonstrates our new speed to market capability and our expertise in girl play. We're pleased with the strong early reads and I look forward to updating you on future calls.

Now as we move toward the most significant part of the year, I'm encouraged with our progress, the growing traction for our brands, and our significant wins in licensed partnerships. Significant challenges remain but we are meeting these head on while we create major new opportunities for growth.

We said our success this year will largely be a function of Mattel's ability to overcome a unique and significant revenue gap. We're increasingly confident that we have the momentum to do just that, given the alignment of a very talented organization and the continued strong performance of key core brands, Toy Box and emerging markets.

We will continue to look to stabilize our business this year and create a solid foundation for growth in 2017 and beyond. Now I'd like to turn the call over to Kevin Farr. Kevin..

Thank you Richard and good afternoon everyone. As Chris and Richard said, despite the impact of foreign exchange, we continue to execute well on our topline, and we made significant progress on our cost savings programs, which help offset some of the ForEx headwinds in the middle of the P&L.

As a result, our overall performance is in line with our expectations for the quarter and the first half. Before going into some of the details, I’d like to remind everyone that unless otherwise noted, I'll be referring to gross sales in constant currency in order to provide better visibility into the underlying topline trends.

And in order to provide more transparency into the fundamentals of the business, I will also reference some adjusted financial results that exclude certain non-recurring items related to the acquisitions of MEGA, Fuhu and Sproutling as well as severance related to business transformation and cost saving initiatives.

As always, reconciliation to GAAP numbers are provided in our press release and the slide deck. I also want to take a moment to discuss the impact of Brexit on our business.

Since it occurred so late in the quarter, Brexit has a minimal impact on Q2 results, and assuming the continued uncertainly doesn’t further impact financial markets or the consumer economic outlook, Brexit will only have a modest impact on our full year results.

Based upon current trends, we believe the negative impact from foreign exchange will be roughly $0.02 to $0.05 of EPS for the year related to Brexit. Now moving to the highlights and topline trends; gross sales were down just 1% in the quarter in constant currency and down 4% as reported.

On a year-to-date basis, gross sales were 1% down in constant currency, and down 5% as reported. Gross sales were up in North America and Asia Pacific with Latin America down 7% and Europe down slightly at 2%.

Finally, on a year-to-date basis, we continue to see strong growth in key emerging markets like China and Russia, and as Richard mentioned the underlying trends look even more favorable when we exclude Disney Princess, and we remain quite confident that we’ll achieve our full year goal of relatively flat net sales in constant currency.

Moving to the rest of the P&L, while we continue to invest in the retail promotions and work more closely with the retail consumers in support of our ongoing turnaround efforts, sales adjustments were 9.1% in the quarter, versus 9.8% in the prior period.

Year-to-date sales adjustments for 9.3% versus 9.7% as we continue to see positive POS trends in our core brands and Toy Box. Our reported gross margins in the second quarter were 45.3%, with ForEx once again the major driver of the decline.

If the year-over-year impact of foreign exchange is excluded, our gross margin rate was relatively flat to Q2 2015. The other key driver declining gross margin rate in the quarter was mix with a strong growth and profitable with lower margin brands like MEGA and Fisher-Price and a shift away from our higher margin doll business.

Overall, the negative impact of foreign exchange and mix was partially offset by our cost savings initiatives and the strategic pricing of our 2016 product line. Moving beyond gross margin, advertising was lower as we continue to move closer to 12% for the full year, coupled with the benefit from foreign exchange.

We also remained disciplined in S&A with adjusted SG&A being down by approximately $17 million or 5% in the quarter and down by $43 million or 6% year-to-date. These results were due in part to cost saving initiatives which more than offset expected wage inflation.

As described in this slide deck and Company's earnings release, please note that we now include MEGA acquisition related amortization expenses, and in our adjusted SG&A numbers. Importantly, we are still on track to deliver at the high end of the $250 million to $300 million range for our two year funding the future cost savings program.

We delivered approximately $31 million in gross savings in Q2 and $77 million year-to-date. Finally, adjusted EPS for the second quarter was a negative $0.02 per share or negative $0.06 per share as reported. As it relates to our balance sheet and cash flow, we ended the first half of the year with $318 million of cash.

This was in line with our expectations and reflects solid performance as we continue to tightly manage working capital. Not surprisingly, owned inventory and balance sheet was up year-over-year as we positioned the business to deliver in the second half.

Finally, we continue to reward our shareholders by deploying capital in a disciplined manner and maintaining dividend. As we’ve said, dividends remain our first priority after re-investing in the business, and the Board declared a third quarter dividend of $0.38 per share, which is flat compared to third quarter of 2015.

As many of you know, we have some debt coming due this year. Given current rates, we have planned to refinance the $300 million of senior unsecured debt that is maturing in November of 2016. So overall our balance sheet remains strong and we expect to end the year with cash of $800 million to $1 billion. One final note regarding foreign exchange.

Given the significant volatility in the foreign exchange rates over the past 18 months, we recently conducted a thorough review of our approach to quantifying the impact at each element of our P&L. As result of these efforts, we reclassified some forecasted foreign exchange benefits that were previously embedded in product cost.

Importantly, this reclassification does not change our total gross margin expectations for the year or funding our future cost savings targets. However, it does result in the moderately lower ForEx impact on margins and earnings.

For the full year we now expect the negative impact of foreign exchange and net sales would be 2% to 4% and EPS will be at the below end of our original $0.30 to $0.40 per share outlook when you include the impact of recent events like Brit Exit.

Looking forward, and summarizing our current 2016 outlook, we’re still targeting relatively flat net sales in constant currency for the year.

Similar to last year, we expect second half sales to be more weighted to Q4, due to the timing of our promotional efforts and our marketing spend, the timing of new product and distribution initiatives and how retailers are likely to tightly manage the inventory leading up to the holiday season.

And as Chris mentioned, while we expect the negative impact to currency to lessen in the back half for the year, we see additional challenges, primarily mix continuing.

While these challenges will partially offset by strategic pricing, supply chain efficiencies, and cost savings initiatives, we recognize we’ll likely come up a bit short to our 2016 gross margin outlook. At this point, we believe gross margins for the full year will be around 48.5% with ForEx headwinds and mix driving a majority of the decline.

However, with additional sales volume, improved mix and more cost savings dropped in the bottom line, we expect gross margins will improve sequentially in the second half of the year. That means the second half gross margin of about 50%, which is roughly equivalent to what we achieved in the second half of 2015.

More specifically, for the third quarter we expect the step up in margin versus the second quarter to be similar to our historical averages around 300 basis points, driven by the seasonal scale our revenues relative to second quarter, less headwind from foreign exchange, slightly better mix and incremental supply chain and other cost savings initiatives.

We expect the fourth quarter gross margin to be in line with our historical averages. The expected improvement over Q3 will be driven by our girls’ properties gaining momentum, less impact of Disney Princess and we get incremental flow through due from our supply chain and other cost savings initiatives.

Finally, it's important to mention that our long term objective remains to achieve about 50% gross margins in the future.

Shifting to SG&A, while the impact of including MEGA amortization adjusted SG&A increases the 2015 SG&A base to 1.465 billion, we continue to target adjusted SG&A to be down $55 million to $65 million versus last year’s $1.448 billion adjusted SG&A baseline.

The year-over-year impact of adding the MEGA amortization back into adjusted SG&A is $9 million. This target reflects the full absorption overhead related to Q1 acquisition of few Fuhu and Sproutling, where we are aggressively pursuing cost savings opportunities across the Company to absorb the bulk of overhead from those acquisitions.

This change in the treatment of MEGA amortization does not impact reported SG&A.

Finally, looking beyond this year of transition, in addition to the ongoing brand momentum and new initiatives that Richard covered, we expect 2017 to benefit as we leverage Fuhu and Sproutling technology platforms across our portfolio and expand our market opportunities.

We also have a tailwind on the topline revenues from Cars 3 movie and continued traction in China, Russia and other emerging markets. Further, we have a strong revenue pipeline for growth in 2018 with our entertainment lineup of Toy Story 4 and Jurassic World.

As we previously stated, we continue to see an ability to approach more normal operating margins in 2017 and beyond. Overall, we view the second quarter results positively and continue to focus on the turnaround and setting up the business for sales and profit growth in 2017 and beyond.

We look forward to updating you on the progress throughout the rest of the year. We will now open the call up for questions.

Operator?.

[Operator Instruction] We will be taking our first question on line of Drew Crum from Stifel. Your line is open..

I wonder if you could quantify point of sales for Barbie. During the quarter you mentioned that shipments were up 24% ex-currency.

What was the consumer takeaway for that brand?.

Hi, Drew. It’s Richard. We have seen great consistency in the U.S. with our POS up double digits in the U.S. for the second quarter, and up single digits in international. Globally we’re really obviously pleased with the performance. It was some licensing revenue realized in the second quarter with our partnership with Universal.

That being said, we still have strong shipping numbers and the POS is certainly commensurate with that. Lastly, as I mentioned in my remarks, we’ve had some great space increases in the second half, which we have obviously started to ship into as part of the Barbie sales play..

Okay.

And Richard, could you comment on the competitive dynamics you are seeing in the doll category generally? Has that changed from what you saw last year and are you anticipating any change as you get into the second half of this year?.

You know the fashion doll category always in back half has certainly strong elements at competition. There could always be a surprise here there. This year I think really in particular that the shocking [ph] brands has been very successful. It continues to be a trend particularly in the small doll category that is capturing girls’ attention.

Clearly, we’re competing now with the Disney Princess franchise.

But in particular I would say the strength of the Barbie brand and it's renewed positioning, the additional marketing and merchandising and execution that we’ve done to get that brand to be more culturally relevant has seen a resurgence and we’re feeling confident with our plans on that brand in particular.

As I mentioned, of course Monster High, we have a lot programs in place in the back half. It still remains, as I mentioned again, the second largest fashion doll business in the world. I continue to be bullish on the brand as intellectual property as engagement remains consistent and in fact increasing.

As we get more pronounced in digital apps and storytelling, our websites and entertainment continue to attract girls. And last but not least, we’re really pleased with My Mini Mixie Q's as an early start, going after if you will, the small doll collectable space. That is obviously a trend in the market.

So overall feeling confident of our positioning in the portfolio, and as we continue to expand the DC Super Hero Girls line to the mass markets, we think that we’ve got a great lineup for the back half. .

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line Felicia Hendrix from Barclays. Your line is open. .

Kevin, you gave us some nice color on your outlook and particularly at growth margins.

I just -- if we could just, revisit your gross margin forecast, which seems to be revised; can you just expand upon your prepared remarks regarding the rationale for that change?.

Yes. I think the rationale for the change is it’s difficult to predict but at this point we believe that mix will be a bit more challenging to the full year. That said, we expect to see incremental, sequential improvement in gross margin in the second half.

As I said in my prepared remarks that to achieve that we need a 50% gross margin for the balance of the year.

That’s consistent with what we delivered in 2015 and you look at what’s going drive it, I think sequentially in the third quarter, we’re going to see a step up consistent with our historical averages of about 300 basis points, and the biggest driver of that is really the scale of our business.

The third quarter is twice the size in general of the first quarter, first and second quarter separately. And then I think also we, as we talked about and Chris mentioned, we see less of a headwind in Forex.

We see mix getting slightly better in the third quarter, and then also we see the cost savings flow through in the third quarter that we achieved in manufacturing in the second quarter. There’s about one quarter lag in production and the time we sell it. And also our other cost savings initiatives that impact gross margins.

And then in the fourth quarter we see getting back to the historical levels, and the biggest driver of that incrementally is better mix as result of -- as Richard just said we see in the holiday season, our doll portfolio performing better, Barbie, DC Super Hero’s and American Girl, and that’s going to be the biggest driver to increase sequentially gross margins in the fourth quarter.

Along, again, we’ll see more flow through of supply chain savings and other cost savings initiatives around the Company..

Okay that’s helpful. .

Felicia, it’s Chris. If I can just add just a parenthetical here; look, if you stand back from it all, I think the broad stroke is, we’re very close to where we thought we were tracking. I think foreign exchange is about what we were expecting.

If anything though, we’ve been struggling a little bit more on the mix side, and the good news is the revenue has been strong. But the mix has been a little off. So we’re trying to flag a little prudence here for you. I think that’s that biggest shift we’re seeing as we forecast the balance on margin. .

When you say struggling on the mix, does that just mean that some things are more fluid than you had expected before, because like last quarter you had attributed the mix headwinds to boys and infant pre-school and this quarter you’re talking about MEGA and Fisher-Price. So it sounds like mix is a bit fluid..

I think that's fair. I think those are the elements that are driving strong, and we've been a little soft on the doll business, which is obviously higher margin. So some of that will probably continue through, even if it improves the balance of the year..

Okay, helpful. Richard, can you just walk us through your decision to pick up the Jurassic World franchise. Hasbro didn’t speak very favorably about that. It's a franchise that seems to drop off precipitously in a year following a movie.

So just wondering, I'm sure you guys have plans to make it more of a sustainable brand, if you could talk about some of your thoughts there..

Yes, we are thrilled to win the Jurassic license, and believe there's significant opportunity to grow this business; certainly, given our global scale and expertise. But the storytelling themselves, obviously the penetration of the property, and frankly dinosaurs in general are a proven play pattern for a very long time.

Our license includes multi-categories and obviously a great lineup for 2018 and beyond, and it emphasizes obviously our continued partnership with Universal. As we mentioned, Fast and Furious is also an announcement that we made that we're pretty excited about. I think in general it adds a perfect new brand to our portfolio.

We're very excited about the partnership with NBC Universal. It's a great team operating there that we're incredibly synergistic with, and I think certainly as the teams get started on creative development we're truly excited about what the opportunities lay ahead for 2018 and beyond..

Let me just add Felicia, this is one -- this is clearly the flagship franchise for Universal and it was a highly competitive process. It was one that was highly sought after. I think we feel excellent about the fact that we were awarded this, and given the opportunity we see huge upside to it.

So I just would want to make sure this doesn't get characterized as a difficult franchise or one that was maybe there for the picking up. This was a highly, highly competitive process and one where it was highly sought after. So we're ecstatic about it to be honest with you..

Well that's great and congratulations. And then just housekeeping. On Cars 3, just are you still expecting that to generate $350 million in revenues next year..

Yes..

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Arpine Kocharian from UBS Investment Bank. Your line is open..

So ex-Disney mid-single digit POS is pretty encouraging for the quarter. But I wanted to address for a second the sustainability of it into the second half.

As you look into the second half of the year and sort of compare shelf space gained or not gained, both in core brands and Toy Box related products, could you give an indication where Mattel is in terms of what retailers are indexing for the back half. Because you saw a step up change perhaps in Q4 of last year right.

So in terms of retailers’ willingness to take in more, you've talked about better shelf space this year versus last. Could you just talk about general retail setups as you look into the second half? Overall, great quarter. Thanks..

Sure, I'll start, and then maybe Chris can add some color to it.

Space ebbs and flows with POS performance, and certainly if you take a look at our core brand performance overall, we've had really consistent delivery of consumer takeaway, particularly with core brands like Barbie as we mentioned, which has had a really strong resurgence and certainly performance this quarter and POS continues to obviously get retailers more confident, and us more confident in the opportunities for that brand.

But across our core brand portfolio we've been quite pleased with the continued space increases along with POS.

In addition to that, in the fourth quarter, particularly during the holiday period, a lot of the space increments are out of aisle placements, and those are obviously highly competitive spots, but we are aggressively pursuing those with our retail partners with great promotional programs and added marketing that justifies getting that space, and I think we are commensurate if not equal to last year, and in some cases ahead of last year.

We've have a terrific commercial organization that executes around the world, around space in increments and they've done a terrific job lining up the fourth quarter promotionally programming wise to get that space. .

That's great. And then I have a follow-up on Barbie.

Richard, is it possible to breakdown whether Barbie would still up double-digits if you were to exclude the licensing revenue or perhaps you could just give us the licensing revenue?.

Barbie would be up double-digits, excluding the licensing revenue. As I mentioned, we had a very strong quarter in Barbie, in general both in shipping and POS, and yes it would be up double-digits excluding the licensing revenue..

And would you say that strength is driven by core dolls versus Fashionista? How would you sort of breakdown that double digit gain?.

Sure. Actually Fashionista it is core dolls. Fashionista is within the line architecture of Barbie, the fashion dolls segment that we have renewed obviously with body types as well as ethnic diversity.

Good news is we’re seeing that piece of the business grow tremendously, in fact just basic core dolls with the Fashionista cultural noise and new introductions has gained enormous traction.

In addition to that, which we kind of classified more as the fashion segment of our business, as you know, we introduced a new segment to the younger girl called Dreamtopia, which has a lineup of both doll and accessory along with content and various other forms of IP extensions, that has resonated incredibly well.

In fact, the younger girl segment of our business is growing exponentially much faster than we had anticipated. We we're really pleased with Dreamtopia’s connectivity and we believe it's a segment that's going to continue for quite some time.

Last but not least, the estate strategy within Barbie is always a really key component of our back half strategy, with Dream House and Campers and various different other accessories that out of lot of volume and certainly marketing ability for the brand.

So we are lined up well for the back half and Fashionista is certainly gaining more and more traction around the world..

Fantastic, and just one more to squeeze in. Regarding DC Super Hero Girls, if you could just address, you obviously rolled it out globally, starting from July and end of June exclusivity with target ended.

If you were to sort of look full year potential from that property, would you say you are incrementally more positive or right about in line what you were thinking that property could do for the full year, because that also dollar-to-dollar offsets Disney Princess margin still?.

We had -- as you know, we've been working on this project for quite some time. We had high expectations for it and they continue to meet our expectations.

We're getting more and more excited about not only the product lineup and the connectivity that we’re seeing consumers have with the brand, certainly indicated by POS, but the cultural message ultimately have grown and the franchise if you will under DC Superhero with girl characters that could be extended for years, represents a really significant new branded piece of our girl portfolio that we are extremely excited about..

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Tim Conder from Wells Fargo Securities. Your line is open..

Thank you. Gentlemen, I wanted to circle back on the gross margin and mix has just been slightly weaker in the dolls than you anticipated many days ago.

Is that -- can you characterize that as being due to within a doll brand, or are we talking about among the doll brands? So against the ladder it would be maybe Monster High, maybe your expectations got lowered a little bit there, or is it something maybe mix within the like Barbie brand itself, the sub brands within that? A little more color on that please?.

Yes, it's probably more related to Monster High and I was contracting year-to-date. That’s impacted that gross margin outlook on the doll princess..

Okay, and then I think Chris, you said that from an FX perspective, that it come in pretty much as we anticipated 90 days ago?.

I think that’s right. Kevin alluded to Brexit. We really don’t know. At this point that looks pretty de-minimis. So we’re probably tracking pretty close to where we were on overall ForEx. I think he indicated some of the adjustments we have made in allocation, but the impact is still basically the same..

Okay. And then Kevin, in your announcements of the geographic areas, and this is nothing new.

Brazil for a lot of industries has been a problem child area, but when from your perspective in Mattel’s business -- are we getting close to that bottoming and this would seem the only area where there might be just a hair of inventor mentioned on the slide that -- how do you see that timeline unfolding in Brazil? There is an impact to Latin America is a whole?.

I'll take that Tim. Look; Brazil is obviously the continued soft spot. I’d throw Venezuela in there but it's kind of down to a rounding this point, but I think Brazil has probably got a few or couple of more quarters to get through from our perspective. The good news is currency is stabilizing.

I think some of the retail problems we had with credit and so forth hopefully are bottoming out. So I would expect as we get through this year Brazil will become hopefully not as much of a factor if you will. The good news is other parts of South America are doing quite well, Mexico is holding up and part of the South Carolina.

So that’s probably our biggest soft spot at this point..

Okay. And then gentlemen, just from a definitional perspective, we get this from clients a lot, when you say relatively flat, any type of range or parameters you can put on that plus or minus, are we talking like 50 bps or whatever? And thank you again for the color on the gross margins in the preamble and in the answers here..

Nobody here seems to be stepping up to this one. But look what we try to say, we want to kind of hold it flat in constant currency. That’s still our objective and I think we’ve been close. We’re getting more confidence in it. So I think that’s still a fair target for all of you..

Thank you our next question comes from the line of Linda Bolton-Weiser from B. Riley and Company. Your line is open..

Can you give us some color on whether the DC Hero Girls distribution beyond target, how materially in the quarter or is that shipment into the channel more happening starting in the third quarter?.

Hi Linda, its Richard. No, I wouldn’t say materially helping the quarter. It does add more shipping in the third quarter..

Okay. And then sort of getting back to the mix question, since that seems to be but everybody is interested in here. I guess I wouldn’t have started out the year thinking Barbie sales would be up 20% or so. So that piece is clearly maybe even better than you expected.

So when you put together the Barbie and the Monster High -- we all knew Monster High would be challenging.

Are you saying that this kind of two things put together net-net is still coming in kind of a little below what you would have expected? Is that kind of -- and then therefore that’s effecting the mix for the whole Company?.

I think Linda, it's a combination of things, but it's largely that Barbie is doing extremely well. I think as we look at the full year probably, hopefully a little better than we would have expected. Conversely, Monster High is softer than we had hoped at this point. I think it probably more than offsets the uptick on that side.

Obviously we’re building on American girls. So that’s been a bit of an issue as well. So when you aggregate it, it's not a huge differential, but enough that we at least have been struggling through it the last quarter, so and we just want to make sure that we don’t get out ahead of ourselves.

If we keep driving success with some of these girls’ properties, we would hope that becomes maybe less of an issue. But at least we thought we would flag it..

Yes, I think also the other thing -- the positive thing, we're seeing greater growth out of MEGA than we anticipated, as well as in Fisher-Price. So more of this also relates to that fact that we’re seeing good growth there and somewhat a little bit less in dolls, but overall it's going to have a slight impact to the year on gross margins of 48.5%..

Right.

And then again not be the debt horse here, but on the Monster High, would you say that relative to your expectations, is the short-term more on the shelf space situation or the POS?.

Well, generally the two go hand-in-hand. In many cases that the brand presence also defined by space can help promote POS. Much of the retail decision consumers make is actually in the aisle.

That being said, as you know, we took a strategic direction to edit the character assortment that we had in Monster High, which was a strategic intent at the same time that we are losing some shelf space. We are also seeing some traction in a concentrated effort on the core characters.

Our new mini collectibles are obviously gaining traction as I mentioned and there are some other products in there that are giving us great encouragement to believe that actually as the brand resets itself with new product offerings, that POS will be commensurate.

Again, we are putting a lot on the back half ultimately with the reboot of the content strategy, which sort of talks to the origins of the brand again.

We are introducing the brand to the whole new generation of girls, frankly, which is an opportunity that we have in our business that's particularly unique, and we are pretty confident that our -- the brand is resonating with consumer engagement and connectivity. We just need to get that connectivity back to merchandizing.

And certainly once we get that POS back on track, you could be sure that, we will aggressively pursue commensurate space. .

Okay, and just Kevin on the SG&A, I didn’t quite catch the $55 million to $65 million reduction year-over-year is off what base now for 2015?.

It’s off the adjusted base before the change that we made with respect to the treatment of MEGA related intangible amortization. So I guess, what -- the headline here is, look our target remains the same, to reduce our SG&A, adjusted SG&A by $55 million to $65 million, based upon using the original base of $1.448 billion.

And then I think with regard to that calculation, you then would have to add back $9 million to your estimate because we’re going to include MEGA intangible amortization in SG&A. And that’s really to comply with SEC guidelines about non-GAAP reporting. We consider this to be less non-recurring, because we do have amortization expense.

But if you look at this change in amortization expense for MEGA, overall reported SG&A will not increase. .

Okay, and sorry if I missed it, but on the Jurassic license, did you say there actually would be some shipments in sales in second half ’17 or not till 2018?.

I wouldn’t count on that. The movie comes out in 2018..

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Gerrick Johnson from BMO Capital Markets. Your line is open..

On MEGA, what’s left in international distribution? Is it flowing fully through the Mattel infrastructure at this point or do you still have some distributor agreements to switch over?.

I think we’re pretty well in a heavy rollout everywhere at this point, Gerrick. And a lot of the growth we’re saying is driving through some of the international expansion. .

Right, okay.

And then American Girl WellieWishers, what level of concern might you have there that that sub-brand could affect the pricing you have with the core doll?.

Gerrick, it’s Richard. There’s a lot of differences between our core brands, particularly in historical segment in the context of sort of how it compares to WellieWishers. WellieWishers is designed to appeal to a younger girl, very specifically.

The content itself, books and episodic animated series are geared towards younger girls, characteristics of friendship, empathy, kindness and so forth. It is positioned very differently than the core brand and so we believe that these can sit complementary to each other. Almost as an entry price point, an introduction to the American Girl franchise. .

We’re tracking it very carefully and it’s clearly two weeks into it, but early reads are very good and incrementality looks very high. So we’ll have more to report but, early signs are very positive. .

Okay great and just quickly, have you run the Barbie You Can Be Anything advertising internationally yet? Or when does that occur? Thanks. .

We have started to do that. The bulk of that programming is going to be happen in the second half, in addition to which you’ll start to see different takes of that program in the U.S., with some great media marketing planned for the back half as well.

So that will continue, not only growing out, but also taking new cues and creativity, particularly in the U.S. .

Operator, I think we have time for one last question..

Okay, our last question for the day will come from the line of Jim Chartier from Monness Crespi Hardt. It wasn't long enough. Your line is open..

I noticed the funding of future initiatives, you increased the cost savings by $15 million this year versus last quarter. Is that able to offset any of the incremental SG&A from the MEGA amortization..

Yes, Jim, that's what we've been working on. I think Kevin's reporting on a couple different initiatives here. One is the Funding The Future, where we are at the top end and I think he's reporting some of the -- the positive numbers there.

We've been driving well beyond that though to get more cost out of the system, and that's the area where we're looking to cover some of the incrementality of our acquisitions..

Okay. And then, recently you guys mentioned you thought you could approach the low end of the 15 to 20% long term operating margin target next year.

Given kind of the gross margin reduction in expectation this year, do you still think that's possible?.

Yes, I think so.

I think the first thing that's going to drive that is scale, and I think the addition of Cars 3, and that incremental $350 million is going to help us, because that's going to leverage our scale in both gross margin as well as you know I think as we look at 2017, we want to make progress in moving gross margins higher and I think we'll do that with better brand statements and better leverage.

And then again we're continuing to lean into cost both in the supply chain and across the back office. So I think with regard to my comments, I indicated that we do expect in 2017 to deliver more normalative profitability and that means moving towards that 15% to 20% operating profit as a percentage of sales..

Keep in mind Jim, to get any stability which we seem to be getting on foreign exchange, it becomes a lot easier for us to kind of manage the cost and pricing equation than it has been. So that's another plus as we look to next year..

Great. And then my last question, you mentioned some drivers of sales for 2018, Toy Story, Jurassic World and some core initiatives. Is Toy Story, is that big enough to offset an expected Cars decline from '17..

Yes, Toy Story is a huge toy franchise, and in particular historically been very significant. So the lineup actually is perfect in the context of sort of looking at lapping volume, but we're really excited about the potential of Toy Story, and as we know it early on, we'll be able to build an even more robust program..

And I think you add Jurassic World on top of that, and I think history would say that Cars in the second year usually does fairly well. So I don't think you'll see the decline in Cars as much as we do other movies in 2018..

And to add to it for one second, just because we haven’t really talked about it enough, but our partnership with Warner Brothers is significant and laps again in 2017. We have Wonder Woman and Justice League and we extend that into 2018 with additional DC major theatrical releases, which are gaining incredible traction.

So we are as we’ve said positioning ourselves for great long term growth..

Great, there will be a replay of this call available beginning at 8 p.m. Eastern Time today. The number to call for the replay is 404-537-3406 and the pass code is 35334734. Thank you for participating in today’s discussion..

Ladies and gentlemen, this now concludes the program and you may all disconnect at this time. Everyone, have a great day..