RYN - NYSE

Welcome, and thank you for joining Rayonier's Second Quarter 2024 Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] Today's conference is being recorded. If you have any objections, you may disconnect at this time. Now, I will turn the meeting over to Mr. Collin Mings, Vice President, Capital Markets and Strategic Planning.

Thank you and good morning. Welcome to Rayonier's investor teleconference covering second quarter earnings. Our earnings statements and financial supplement were released yesterday afternoon and are available on our website at rayonier.com. I would like to remind you that in these presentations, we include forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of federal securities laws. Our earnings release and forms 10-K and 10-Q filed with the SEC, lists some of the factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements we may make. They are also referenced on Page 2 of our financial supplement. Throughout these presentations, we will also discuss non-GAAP financial measures, which are defined and reconciled to the nearest GAAP measures in our earnings release and supplemental materials. With that, let's start our teleconference with opening comments from Mark McHugh, our President and CEO. Mark?

Thanks, Collin. Good morning everyone. First, I'll make some high level comments before turning it over to April Tice, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, to review our consolidated financial results. Then we'll ask Doug Long, Executive Vice President and Chief Resource Officer, to comment on our US and New

Thanks, Mark. Moving to the financial highlights on Page 5 of the supplement, sales for the second quarter totaled $174 million while operating income was $12 million and net income attributable to Rayonier was $2 million or $0.01 per share. On a pro forma basis, net income was $4 million or $0.02 per share. Pro forma items in the second quarter included $1.1 million of net costs associated with legal settlements and $700,000 of costs related to our disposition plans. Adjusted EBITDA was $56 million in the second quarter, down from $69 million in the prior year period. On the bottom of Page 5, we provide an overview of our capital resources and liquidity. Our Cash Available for Distribution or CAD, for the first half of the year was $60 million versus $63 million in the prior year period. The decrease was driven by lower adjusted EBITDA, partially offset by lower net cash interest paid. A reconciliation of CAD to cash provided by operating activities and other GAAP measures is provided on Page 8 of the financial supplement. We closed the second quarter with $142 million of cash and roughly $1.4 billion of debt. Our net debt to trailing 12 months adjusted EBITDA was approximately 4.3 times. At quarter end, our weighted average cost of debt was approximately 2.8% and the weighted maturity, average maturity of our debt portfolio was approximately five years, with no significant debt maturities until 2026. Our net debt to enterprise value based on our closing stock price at the end of the quarter was 22%. I'll now turn the call over to Doug to provide a more detailed review of our timber results.

Thanks, April. Let's start on Page 9 with Southern Timber segment. Adjusted EBITDA in the second quarter of $34 million was $10 million or 22% below the prior year quarter, driven by lower volumes and higher costs, partially offset by slightly higher net stumpage realizations. Total harvest volumes fell 17% versus a strong prior year quarter due to weather related constraints in the Gulf region as well as weaker demand from sawmills. Meanwhile, non-timber revenue decreased 5% versus the prior year period as continued growth in our land-based solutions business was more than offset by lower pipeline easement revenues. Average saw log stumpage pricing was $29 per tonne, a 1% increase compared to the prior year period due to improved chip and salt pricing in most of our markets. Pulpwood net stumpage pricing was 10% higher than the prior year quarter at roughly $17 per tonne. Overall, weighted average stumpage prices in the second quarter increased 2% versus the prior quarter to roughly $22 per tonne. Improved in-market demand and reduced residual sawmill chip availability translated into improved pulpwood pricing across most of our markets in US South. Market pulp prices have improved over the past year and containerboard operating rates continue to rebound following the inventory destocking cycle that weighed heavily on containerboard demand in 2023. Turning to Grade markets. Log demand softened throughout the second quarter due to continued weakness in Southern Yellow Pine lumber demand as well as drier weather across our Atlantic operating areas. Encouragingly, we have seen indications that the second quarter may mark the low point in pricing. Additionally, over the past few months, we've seen a nearing of the price discount between Southern Yellow Pine lumber and other species. However, the overall demand picture for lumber remains challenged by continued softness in housing and repair and remodel markets. Lumber producers are responding by reducing production, with several mills in the region opting to reduce output in response to current market conditions. In turn, we're seeing less demand for sawtimber as mills adjust their operations over the near term. That said, the relative strength and diversity of our US South footprint remains a key competitive advantage as we navigate these headwinds. We anticipate a potential rebound in end-market demand following expected interest rate cuts later this year. When this occurs, we believe that our strategic positioning will allow us to capitalize on stronger log pricing as lumber production ramps up again in the US South. Moving to our Pacific Northwest Timber segment on Page 10. Adjusted EBITDA of $6 million was $1 million below the prior year quarter. The year-over-year decrease was primarily driven by lower harvest volumes and lower non-timber revenue, partially offset by improved net stumpage realizations. Volumes decreased 12% in the second quarter as compared to the prior year period, reflecting the large disposition we completed in Oregon during late 2023. At $91 per tonne, average delivered domestic saw log pricing in the second quarter decreased 7% in the prior year period due to a combination of weaker demand from domestic lumber mills, a lower proportion of Douglas-Firvolumes, and reduced export market tension. Meanwhile, at $30 per tonne, pulpwood pricing remained fairly stable during the quarter, but was down 17% versus a strong prior year quarter that benefited from favorable supply demand dynamics for pulpwood in the region. Overall, despite lower delivered pricing, net stumpage realizations increased 10% due to favorable pricing on stumpage sales and lower per tonne cut and haul costs on delivered volume. The Pacific Northwest log market continued to face headwinds during the second quarter from both challenging domestic lumber markets and reduced demand for log exports. Similar to the US South, sawmills in the region are responding to these market conditions by reducing lumber production to better align with current demand. Still, our pricing has been fairly resilient thus far in 2024. We believe that the threat of potential supply constraints as we enter the peak of fire season as well as the recent uptick in lumber prices should translate into fairly stable pricing with some modest upside potential as we move through the balance of the year. Moving to New

Thanks, Doug. As detailed on Page 12, the contribution from our Real Estate segment during the second quarter was considerably higher than the first quarter, fueled in large part by a non-strategic timberland sale in New

Thanks, April. As I reflect on the first half of the year, I'm proud of how our team has continued to navigate challenging operating conditions with an unwavering focus on making decisions in the best long-term interest of Rayonier and its shareholders. To this end, we elected to strategically defer some harvests in more challenged markets to preserve value in the phase of ongoing headwinds posed by soft domestic lumber markets and lower export market demand. Despite the headwinds facing sawtimber markets this year, we are encouraged by the sustained improvement in pulp mill operating rates across our US South footprint and the corresponding gains in pulpwood pricing that we've been able to capture. The prospect of rate cuts later this year, coupled with continued low log inventories in China, give us additional reasons for optimism over the balance of the year. On the Real State front, we've been pleased by the continued demand for both rural and development properties despite the higher interest rate environment. As previously discussed, we expect a significantly stronger contribution from our real estate segment during the second half of the year versus the first half. We also believe that more favorable financing conditions could further bolster the already healthy demand we're seeing across our real estate categories. Throughout the first half of the year, we've also continued to advance important strategic initiatives. On the land-based solutions front, our team is energized by the pipeline of opportunities we're pursuing with high-quality counterparties. We continue to believe that our land base leaves us uniquely well positioned to grow these revenue streams over time. And as I discussed earlier, we are pleased with the progress we've made toward executing our $1 billion disposition target. There remains a strong bid for timberland assets in the private market and we continue to advance a variety of options to achieve this target. We look forward to sharing more details regarding our disposition efforts in the coming months. That concludes our prepared remarks, and I'll now turn the call back to the operator for questions.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Mark Weintraub with Seaport Research Partners. Your line is open.

Thank you. Two quick questions. One, when you originally announced the disposition plan you had suggested an 18-month time frame, is that still the right duration to be thinking about? Or any update there?

Hey, Mark, this is Mark. Good morning. Yes, that is still the right time frame to be thinking of. As we said, in the prepared remarks as well as in the release. We've made quite a bit of progress here in the last several months, and we look forward to sharing more details on or before our next earnings call.

Okay. I appreciate that. And then any additional specifics in terms of things that might have moved forward on land-based solutions? You made some general comments. But were there any updates that you can give us in terms of things concretely seeing done during the quarter?

Sure. Good morning, this is Doug. On the land-based solutions front, our team continues to advance a range of opportunities with high-quality counterparts we entered before. But to your point, recently, we've added another 5,000 acres of executed carbon capture storage leases. And as we discussed on our last call, we're still well on the way to achieving our year-end goals of having over 70,000 acres under lease for current capture storage and targeting over 50,000 acres under options for solar. So we continue to believe our portfolio is uniquely well positioned to provide these solutions as many large corporations are setting ambitious sustainability goals, including those commits to reduce their carbon footprint and increase the use of renewable energy. So we did have some success in the core -- current quarter and are seeing great progress we move forward for the rest of the year.

Great. And in curiosity, back in February, you provided some targets I guess we're 6 months forward from that. How do you feel about those targets today versus how you felt about them back in February?

Yes, I'd say we still feel very good about those targets. And if anything else, we're seeing probably more interest than we had in February for these type of opportunities.

Okay, thanks so much.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Anthony Pettinari with Citi. Your line is open.

Hi, good morning. This is Gregory on for Anthony. First, I guess, on to Timberlands. Can you just comment on what you saw across your various subregions in the second quarter and maybe what's implied in the full year guidance? And then I'm wondering also if there are any disparities locally in the South, are the main drivers there kind of sawmill operating rates? Or are there more kind of nuanced drivers of prices regionally? Would love to hear your thoughts there.

Sure. This is Doug, and I'll be happy to start there. Yes. I think one thing that's important is to keep in mind that we do a combination of stumpage sales and delivered sales, and we don't have exact control in the quarter when a stumpage track is going to be harvested. And those buyers typically have a year to harvest, and we'll start selling towards the end of Q4 of the prior year and the beginning of the current year. And so to the extent there's market softness or weather issues such as we saw in Texas, Louisiana, there can be some short-term timing differences. And to your point, I think it's worth noting that for the first half of the year, the southern portion of our Southwest resource unit, so kind of the Texas, Louisiana along the Gulf Coast there received more rain than the historical yearly average. So in the first six months, they received over a year's worth of rain and if you saw any new storage [indiscernible], you probably saw the flooding in Houston, things like that, so you can appreciate that. So we did see some reductions in harvest in those areas where it's just too wet to harvest, but we've seen improvements there. And plus, given the market conditions, we've been pretty deliberate about what we brought to market and we didn't look to chase volume. So that said, you after a challenging kind of second quarter and the stumpage our removals are ahead of forecast for July across all of our southern units. So we've seen some improvements across there as we move forward.

Thank you for that. And then maybe if I could just have one follow-up on carbon credits. So based on the data I'm seeing, it looks like New

Hi Greg, this is April, I'll take that. So I'll just take the first half of your question, and then I'll turn it over to Doug to follow up. So -- as we detailed in our supplement, we sold about $4.4 million worth of garden credits in New

Yes. And I'll just address your question a little more around the quality of markets and things like that. So as we discussed at our Investor Day, we continue to be very deliberate in how we're thinking about moving forward in that voluntary card market given our discussions with potential buyers, who are very focused on those high-quality carbon credits. And we see that market really evolving towards the higher quality as you mentioned, that given our high timber EBITDA, it just hasn't made sense for us yet to move forward. That said, we're very encouraged by the progress of the Integrity Council for voluntary carbon markets, they're coming core principles creation process. And what that's going to do is create basically approved credit that from our discussions with customers is something that they really believe will be recognized globally as a benchmark for high-quality carbon credits, ensuring that they represent real, verifiable and additional emission reductions. So we think this is a major milestone that we've really been waiting on and paves the way for verified [indiscernible] to come into this market in the near future and clear out the less meaningful ones that are really lower quality and, therefore, lower price from supply. So really over that longer time horizon, we still believe the man will outpace supply approaching 2030 as people focus on their net zero commitments. And really beyond that. And so we're positioning ourselves to support that growth and demand and meaningfully contribute to this project with pursuing pilot projects that incorporate these latest improvements with the core carbon principles. So we still think this market has some time to develop and that pricing has room to run and we're being patient.

Yes. As it relates to just the ability to monetize New

Thank you very much.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Matthew McKellar with RBC Capital Markets. Your line is open.

Hi, good morning. Thanks to taking my questions. Could you share how you're thinking about the pace of a lot of section in development at Wildlight over the next year or so. That community has built a lot of momentum over the past few years, and you mentioned good interest, but just wondering if you see any signs of caution from builders in the area?

I'd say that the single family homebuilding market has held up reasonably well. I mean that's been a lot of -- it's been pretty well publicized in terms of how that market has held up in the face of higher interest rates. The benefit of hindsight, we now know that a lot of existing homeowners are essentially locked into low rate mortgages, which has really dried up supply in the resale market for -- so much of that demand for homes has transitioned into the new home construction market. And particularly large national homebuilders have been very successful in essentially buying down rates in order to further stimulate demand in that market. I think given the demographics of our projects and Wildlight and Heartwood as well as the relatively affordable price point when you look at those markets relative to other areas of the state or even more broadly the U.S.. We do think that those areas have remained very attractive. And we've certainly transitioned in terms of scale of that project, we've certainly transitioned more towards dealing with large national homebuilders. And so I think that -- look, the market is certainly more cautious today than it was a couple of years ago. But overall, we still feel pretty good about the pace of absorption and the level of interest that we're seeing in those markets.

Okay. Thanks very much for that color. And then for Q3 specifically, do you expect any impact to your business, whether it be disruption to harvest operations or otherwise in the south with some of the heavy rain from the Debbie tropical storm? Or maybe even conversely, would you expect to potentially benefit in some areas, given maybe better road infrastructure versus other owners of timberland in the area?

Yes, sure. This is Doug. I'll be happy to answer that question. Yes. I mean in localized areas, obviously, we've seen rainfall from 7 inches up to well over a foot. So it's going to have a short-term impact on being able to produce logs, at the same point in time, it's reducing lumber capacity, as you say, and the pulp mills and things like that. So short term, we do believe that there's a slowdown in removals, but we're already moving crews around. And to your point, our infrastructure investments -- so we do think there's an opportunity for lenders like ourselves. We've made those investments to recognize increased volume into the mills as well as potentially some pricing comes from that. So it is a short term, but the long term, we don't think there's going be a major impact there. And with our geographic diversity, it impacts kind of our coastal Florida, Georgia, but the rest of our operations, it's had no impact on it.

Okay, great. So then, last one from me. Just touching on the log exports out of the Pacific Northwest, have you seen any change in market conditions there? Any additional tension in the markets compared to what you saw in Q2?

I would say it's pretty much the same. So we're still -- the opportunities for additional exports into China have pretty much remained the same quarter-over-quarter, a little bit of improvement to Japan from what we've seen, but nothing significant to change.

Okay, thanks. That's all for me. I'll turn it back.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Buck Horne with Raymond James. Your line is open.

Hey, thanks. Good morning. I just kind of want to follow up on the kind of the weather update situation with the ground post Debbie. I guess my follow-up would be, if we continue to have a very busy storm season across the Southeast, it feels like your guidance is somewhat dependent on really ramping up harvest activity throughout the third and fourth quarters to kind of recover for the 2Q deferrals. Just wondering what's the flexibility, I guess, across the region if we continue to have a fairly active storm season across the region.

Hey Buck, this is Mark. And I'll maybe start and then kick it over to Doug for any additional detail. But recognize as well, when you mentioned that the guidance was contingent upon higher harvest levels in the back half of the year, that's really more around the Pacific Northwest and New

Mark, I think you did a great job with that. I would just reiterate to your point that typically, if we've seen our operations constrained. That typically means that everyone else has been constrained to a point where pricing oftentimes offsets the impact of reduced risk volumes pretty much to what you said. I think more to add.

Got you. Thanks, guys. That's really helpful color. And then I guess related to, I guess, is kind of a combination question. But it's related to the dividend policy and dividend sustainability here, cash flow trends seem to be trending well below the payout schedule at the moment. with the dispositions that are planned for the back half of this year or into next year, what's the thought process around near-term dividend sustainability or addressing the payout ratio sometime in the near future. Kind of what's the outlook and what's the flexibility on the balance sheet?

Yes. I mean as it relates to this year, Buck, keep in mind, we don't manage our dividend funding or really focus on the payout ratio on a quarter-by-quarter basis. Rather, we're really focused on long-term dividend sustainability and growth. Clearly, this year has gotten off to a slower start than we anticipated. But as we discussed during the prepared remarks, some of this is really timing related with respect to harvest activity and real estate closings. It's also worth noting that even with the slower start to the year, our year-to-date CAD is only about $4 million short of where we were last year at this point in time. And that's largely due to the paydown of some of our higher cost debt late last year with the proceeds of the Oregon disposition. Of course, right now, we're really focused on further advancing our asset disposition target. Which we continue to believe will be accretive to CAD on a per share basis. We also expect the second half cash flow will be significantly higher than first half cash flow. When you put all these factors together, we're still targeting a dividend that is fully funded this year, at least very close to it. And going forward, as we see the run rate impact of our disposition and deleveraging plan take effect, we expect the dividend funding should further improve from there.

Got it. Thanks, guys. Good luck.

Thanks, Buck.

I am showing no further questions at this time. I will turn the conference back to Collin.

This is Collin Mings. I'd like to thank everybody for joining us. Please contact us with any follow-up questions.