Jeffrey D. Pribor
Thanks, Lois, and good morning, everyone. On Slide 8, net income for the second quarter was $62 million or $1.25 per diluted share. Excluding gains on vessel sales, our net income was $50 million or $1.02 per diluted share. On the upper right chart, adjusted EBITDA for the second quarter was $102 million. In the appendix, we provided a reconciliation from reported earnings to adjusted earnings. Our revenue and expenses were largely within expectations in the second quarter, and we are pleased with our cost management this quarter. Our VLCC rates were impacted by a long-haul strategy that didn't allow us to fully capture short spikes during the quarter. MRs were more heavily weighted to the weaker Western market and positioning for a significant number of dry dockings for ships in the CPTA pool operating in the Americas. We're seeing the benefits of those already as our third quarter bookings, which I'll talk about later, have strengthened. Our Lightering business had over $9 million in revenue in the quarter. Combined with less than $3 million in vessel expenses, just under $4 million in charter hire and $1 million of G&A, the Lightering business contributed about $2 million in EBITDA in the second quarter. Turning to our cash bridge on Slide 9, we began the quarter with total liquidity of $673 million, composed of $133 million in cash and $540 million in undrawn revolving capacity. Following along the chart from left to right on the cash bridge, we had $102 million in adjusted EBITDA in the second quarter plus $22 million in debt service and another $29 million of drydock and capital expenditures, offset by a working capital benefit of $20 million due to the timing of payables and receivables. We, therefore, achieved our definition of free cash flows of just about $71 million for the second quarter. This represents an annualized cash flow yield of nearly 15% on today's share price. We received $28 million in proceeds from the 2 vessel sales at the end of the quarter. We paid about $16 million in LR1 newbuilding installments. As previously announced on the last call, we repaid $36 million down on our revolver during the second quarter, of which $16 million offsets our capacity [ reduction ]. The remaining $30 million represents our $0.60 per share dividend that we paid in June. The latter few bars on the chart reflect our balanced capital allocation approach, where we utilized all the pillars, fleet renewal, deleveraging and returns to shareholders. In summary, $71 million of free cash flow plus $28 million in vessel sales, plus $82 million in capital allocation gives us a net positive change in cash of $15 million and an increase in undrawn RCF of $20 million. This equates to ending cash of $149 million with $560 million in undrawn revolvers for total liquidity of over $700 million. Moving to Slide 10, we have a strong financial position detailed by the balance sheet on the left-hand side of the page. Cash and liquidity remained strong at $709 million. We have invested about [ $2 ] million in vessels at cost, which are currently valued at about [ $3 million ]. And with $553 million of gross debt at the end of the second quarter, our net loan-to-value is below 14%. An important highlight to also mention, as we previously announced, is our intention to repay the Ocean Yield loans in November. Under the accounting guidelines, we are required to classify the outstanding debt of $268 million as current debt, which impacts our current ratio. I want to be clear that this does not affect our financial covenants or our ability to fund our current liabilities. While we continue to evaluate numerous financing alternatives for this refinancing, we can simply draw on the RCF to fully fund the repayment. We expect that this refinancing should lower our breakeven costs. On the lower right-hand table, we have detailed our debt portfolio as of June 30. Since then, we repaid the remaining $27 million outstanding on the RCF during the third quarter. By the time of our next earnings call, we expect to have completed documentation and drawn down on our new export agency-backed facility that Lois described. We'd like to thank our partners at K-SURE and DNB for their efforts in financing of up to $240 million on our LR1 newbuildings that effectively achieves a 20-year amortization profile and a margin of 125 basis points over the next 12 years. We've been excited about our dual-fuel-ready LR1 newbuilding. And today, we're very proud to be in the final stages of financing before our scheduled deliveries. We continue to enhance our balance sheet to maintain the financial flexibility necessary to facilitate growth as well as return to shareholders. Our nearest maturity in the portfolio isn't until the next decade. We have 32 unencumbered vessels, and we have ample undrawn revolving credit facility capacity. We continue to explore ways to lower our breakeven cost even more and share the upside with continued double-digit returns to shareholders. And the last slide that I'll cover, Slide 11 reflects our forward-looking guidance and book-to-date TCE aligned with our spot cash breakeven rate. Starting with TCE pictures for the third quarter of 2005, I'll remind you, as I always do, that actual TCE during our next earnings call may be different. But as of today, we currently have a blended average spot TCE of about $28,000 per day fleet-wide at 40% of our third quarter expected revenue. On the right-hand side, our forward spot breakeven rate is about $13,000 per day, composed of a fleet-wide breakeven of about $15,700 per day, plus around $2,600 per day in profit from time charter revenues. Based on our spot TCE book to date and our spot breakeven, it looks like Seaways can continue to generate significant free cash flows during the third quarter and build on our track record of returning cash to shareholders. On the bottom left-hand chart, we provide some updated guidance for our expenses in the third quarter and our estimates for 2025. We also included in the appendix our quarterly expected off-hire and CapEx. I don't plan to read each item line by line, but encourage you to use these for modeling purposes. That concludes my remarks, and I'd like to now turn the call back to Lois for her closing comments.