FCN - NYSE

Good morning, everyone, and welcome to the FTI Consulting, Inc. First Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. All participants will be in a listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please send to a conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by zero. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, you may press star and then one on your telephone keypad. To withdraw your questions, you may press star and two. Please note that this event is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the conference call over to Mollie Hawkes, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Good morning. Welcome to the FTI Consulting, Inc. conference call to discuss the company's first quarter 2025 earnings results as reported this morning. Management will begin with formal remarks, after which they will take your questions. Before we begin, I would like to remind everyone that this conference call may include forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. This includes the company's outlook and expectations for the full year 2025 based on management's current beliefs and expectations. These forward-looking statements contain risks, uncertainties, assumptions, estimates, and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. For a discussion of risks and other factors that may cause actual results or events to differ from those contemplated by forward-looking statements, investors should review the Safe Harbor statement in the earnings press release issued this morning, a copy of which is available on our website at www.fticonsulting.com, as well as other disclosures under the headings of Risk Factors and Forward-Looking Information in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended 12/31/2024 or our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and in our other filings with the SEC. Investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this earnings call and will not be updated. FTI Consulting assumes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, except as required by applicable law. During the call, we will discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures. A discussion of any non-GAAP financial measures addressed on this call and reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP measures are included in the press release and the accompanying financial tables that we issued this morning. Lastly, there are two items that have been posted to the investor relations section of our website for your reference. These include a quarterly earnings presentation, and an Excel and PDF of our historical financial and operating data which have been upgraded to include our first-quarter 2025 results. With these formalities out of the way, I am joined today by Steven Gunby, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and Ajay Sabherwal, our Chief Financial Officer. At this time, I will turn the call over to our President and Chief Executive Officer, Steven Gunby.

Thank you, Mollie. Welcome, everyone. Thank you all for joining us today. As I hope you saw this morning, we reported a strong first quarter. The first quarter did benefit, as Ajay will detail, from some one-time items. But even adjusting for anything one might think of as anomalous, it was a solid quarter. So as we all know, there are lots of puts and takes in the world right now, lots of uncertainty. The start of this year is overall quite consistent with what our expectations were in February when we gave you guidance for the year. Ajay will, as usual, go through the details of this quarter in his typical structured fashion. Given the complexity of the world today, with all the various theories of where the markets and client needs might go, I thought we might go a little deeper than I normally do. On the individual businesses. And share some qualitative observations both on the performances of each of those businesses so far this year, but also on some of the different theories of what their outlooks could be. So I will be a little longer than usual. I hope you will forgive me for that. I want to start with FLC, this quarter. I hope you saw just how fabulous a quarter FLC had. I think the EBITDA this quarter was roughly comparable to what we probably average for half a year for that business over the last few years. The driver of those results is that the teams there have been winning and delivering on some incredibly major roles. I would love to talk about a lot of the specifics. Unfortunately, many of those assignments are confidential due to the nature of the work. The roles the teams are playing are important, critical, powerful, and for us, brand building. At least among the people who know the work we are doing. As I have talked about a number of times, we have always had terrific people in FLC. The issue we have sometimes faced in that business is that an insufficient amount of the world knew how great our people were. I actually think the world at large still does not fully know that. But over the last while, with the new set of energy across the various leadership levels, as well as a somewhat higher level of aggressiveness by many of our SMBs, we now have a bit more of the world understanding the quality of our people and the quality of what we can do, and that is true across a range of the business. Whether it is the power of the deep technical expertise we have in some subareas like cyber, anti-money laundering, anti-consumer fraud, expert controls and sanctions, or others, for the core data analytics and forensic accounting capabilities, that often underpin much of the work or the strengths of some of the other businesses, disputes businesses, a construction and project and assets business or disputes business more general. Our experience is that as increasing parts of the world start to really understand the depth of that expertise, as well as the commitment level of the people in those groups, we increasingly get those important large jobs. Jobs that are often critical to the future of our clients. There is, of course, some serendipity in that. There is also some serendipity as to when those projects end. But my sense is through the zigs and zags over the past few years, we have continued to increase that visibility, and you can see in the results this quarter just how powerful that can be. Let me turn from the quarter to more forward-setting thoughts. The power of our team, the increased visibility, that does not go away. But, of course, individual major assignments can end. And important for this business, as we talked about last quarter, this is a business that can be affected by policies in Washington. Particularly when you think about our strengths in things like anti-consumer fraud, anti-money laundering, FCPA, areas where regulatory posture is potentially changing. So, regulatory shifts could have a considerable effect on this business as the year goes on. We are therefore cautious about not assuming the current strength will get replicated through the end of the year. But importantly, given the capability, given the strength of our go-to-market strategies, it is not just this quarter that I am excited about. I am fundamentally excited about where the team is taking the medium and long-term trajectory of this business. So I took a little extra time on FLC because I really just think the team deserved it. I will try to be a little briefer on some of the other segments, but I want to go through all those sorts of general topics with everybody. So, let me turn to Corp Fin. Here, results are roughly in line with where we expected them to be at this point in the year. With, of course, lots of puts and takes at the sub-business level. The corporate business, as I think you all know, can be sharply affected by macroeconomic factors. For example, whether the restructuring market or the M&A markets are up or down. We, of course, are not totally driven by those end-market moves. We have shown, I believe, over the last several years, our ability to gain share through the cycles. We are not totally affected, but obviously, not totally insulated. If the restructuring market is booming, this business is going to boom. And if the M&A market is booming, our transaction business is going to benefit. Right now, neither of these markets is particularly strong. So in this quarter, we were relying on our competitive strengths to power those businesses. Even though there were not that many big restructuring jobs out there, we won a number of the ones that were and saw pockets of strength in markets such as Germany. We were actually surprised that our transaction business was as strong as it was this quarter, given the pause in the deal markets. A lot of that had to do with the commercial aggressiveness of our teams today. Importantly, this quarter, we also made and we are making good progress in addressing a couple of the businesses that were drags on results in 2024. In part through targeted headcount actions we took this quarter, which Ajay will speak to, but at least as much with some refocused commercial activity by the terrific talent in those sub-businesses. Those are some comments on the quarter. Let me look forward. Looking forward on this business and the macroeconomic factors, I think as we all hear, every day, there's huge amounts of uncertainty on those macroeconomic factors. Lots of discussion of whether M&A is coming back or not, whether there is an increased chance of recession. I do not think anybody knows what is going to happen. Right now, from our perspective, no signs are so definitive that we are changing our expectations for the year. But stepping away from these short-term factors that can be material for the business, these short-term factors, of course, in no way change the tremendous trajectory that this business has been on or our tremendous conviction of the strength of this business in the medium term. Let me turn to Tech. Which is another business that can be particularly affected by macroeconomic factors. In this business as well as our Econ business, we have record M&A second request revenues in 2024 related to antitrust. So our sense is that this business faces some real headwinds, at least in that portion of the business. I was talking to Sophie the other day, and just in the last couple of months, I think the team had something like six potential second requests canceled, either because the deals were pulled or because the regulatory authorities decided not to challenge. So understandably, that team is worried about the potential near-term headwinds. Stepping back from that, however, that tech team has, by any measure I can see, had the fastest organic growth rate in the industry for a number of years. So if you think about it, if we face headwinds, those headwinds are likely to be even stronger for some of our competitors, many of whom have serious debt loads. In my experience, typically, that would mean over the medium term, we will pick up talent. We will gain even more share. Now, given that competitive strength, not just in M&A, but also in investigations and litigation businesses, as well as our continued investments in key areas like crypto, digital assets, and AI, we remain very bullish about this business's medium-term trajectory. But to be clear, we also cannot gainsay the headwinds the team is facing this year in 2025. In Econ Consulting, the set of departures we have seen in Compass Lexicon below the senior level has ended up being roughly consistent with what we guessed would happen when we talked with you in February. It is, of course, an important hit. But put into perspective, the total departures represent less than 10% of our headcount in Econ, and roughly put that business back to the headcount level it was two years ago. And it still leaves us as the leading economic consulting firm globally, and I think the leading economic consulting firm globally by far, and, of course, from the overall company's perspective, it represents less than 2% of the company's total headcount. As we talked about last time, however, the financial impact on the bottom line is more sizable than simply the headcount impact. The key reason is that when circumstances like this occur, even if you do a terrific job, as the teams are doing and keep most of your people, you end up, in many instances, adjusting compensation levels. And that has clearly happened here, and I believe we talked about that last time. There has been an additional development since last time, which I believe in the long term is a fabulous thing but is adding to near-term financial pressure, which is that this business has since we last talked focused an enormous amount of attention on replenishing talent. I think we've spent more attention on that in our competition side than ever in the business's history and, importantly, we've had enormous success in that endeavor. We have already been able to attract an unbelievable set of academic affiliates and new arrivals. More, and unbelievable talent more than we expected a couple of months ago. These are folks who bring expertise across antitrust, we have some additions to our financial economics business and across key industries such as healthcare, finance, TNT, digital assets, AI. If you look at their website, and I encourage you to do so and see their resumes, you'll see these are people with tremendous academic credentials, but in addition, in many cases, they have served previously in senior roles in government, including the FTC, the FCC, and the SEC. And I was speculating with one person that I think among this group, it might even be a couple of people who have been potential Nobel Prize winners. So I hope you have gleaned from my tone of voice that we are excited about these additions. Taking a step back from those additions, what they do is they enhance what has always been the case. My powerful confidence, my strong confidence in the medium-term prospects of this business. This is a great presence. With terrific potential. And so we have enormous confidence in where this business will be in the medium term. However, we need to say that, given our guess, the near-term P&L hit will be at least as hard as we speculated about in February, perhaps a bit more. Finally, our Stratcom business. As you know, our Stratcom business had some struggles over the last couple of years. Not fundamental struggles, not struggles in competitive position or bottom line results but struggles getting back to the sort of growth that we have been proud to show for a number of years. I think that this quarter suggests we are beginning to get back on track. We still have a way to go to bring that growth back up to our aspirations, but we're seeing good progress, as people are focused on supporting clients amidst this unbelievable political and regulatory uncertainty. That strengthening of Stratcom was expected. We had confidence in the team. Overall, our performance this quarter was in line with what we're hoping to see from Stratcom at this point of the year, and it simply reinforces our strong confidence that the business's medium-term prospects are strong. I hope the look went a lot more in-depth through individual segments than I often do. I think given the uncertainty in the world, both Ajay and I thought to me it makes sense. But, of course, then there's a question of when you step back from the individual segments, where does it all add up to? I think the answer with respect to this year is probably an answer that you were coming into this call for because it's the answer that almost every company is saying today. What it means with respect to this year is uncertainty. If you looked at our guidance range, you'll realize that within our guidance range, there is a scenario where even in the face of the Compass Lexicon disruption, we end up with a solid year. But it also encompasses a very real scenario where, for the first time in my tenure, we're down in adjusted EPS. So there's lots of uncertainty about the year. Importantly, what that uncertainty does not do is shake my conviction about the powerful future this company has. Sure, we have challenges, and there are headwinds in the market. Over the last ten years, we've faced lots of challenges. There have been tremendous variability in market conditions, periods of busts in various markets. If you'll remember, there was a period where our testifiers couldn't testify because the courts were closed. And there are times when competitors have been crazily aggressive. As a consequence, we've had tremendous zigzags in individual businesses and geographies. And even substantial zigzags for the company as a whole over multiple quarters. But we've also talked about the fact that it is through the

I believe the data of the last ten years have turned that theory into a proven proposition. We will maintain that commitment. I firmly believe this company will continue to deliver a future that is extraordinarily bright. With that, let me turn the call over to Ajay to review the details of the quarter. Thank you, Steven. Good morning, everybody. In my prepared remarks, I will take you through our company-wide and segment results for the quarter. First quarter of 2025 revenues of $898.3 million decreased $30.3 million, or 3.3%, compared to the first quarter of last year. Sequentially, compared to Q4 of last year, our revenues were up slightly. GAAP earnings per share of $1.74 compared to $2.23 in the prior year quarter. Adjusted EPS of $2.29 compared to $2.23 in the prior year quarter. The difference between our GAAP and adjusted EPS for the quarter reflects a $25.3 million first quarter special charge related to severance and other employee-related costs, which reduced GAAP EPS by 55¢. Net income of $61.8 million compared to $80 million in the prior year quarter. The decrease in net income was largely driven by lower revenues and the special charge, which was partially offset by a decrease in SG&A and direct costs. Direct costs of $608.9 million compared to $626 million in the prior year quarter. The decrease in direct costs was primarily due to lower variable compensation and contractor costs, which was partially offset by higher benefits and salaries. SG&A of $184.3 million, or 20.5% of revenues, compared to SG&A of $201.9 million, or 21.7% of revenues, in the first quarter of 2024. The decrease in SG&A was primarily due to a benefit from litigation settlements in Q1 and lower bad debt. First-quarter 2025 adjusted EBITDA of $115.2 million, or 12.8% of revenues, compared to $111.1 million, or 12% of revenues, in the prior year quarter. Our first-quarter 2025 effective tax rate of 23.3% compared to 19.6% in the prior year quarter. The prior year quarter tax rate was exceptionally low because of large option exercises in Q1 of last year and the resulting discrete tax adjustment. For full-year 2025, we continue to expect our effective tax rate to be between 23% and 25%. Weighted average shares outstanding, or WAISO, for Q1 of 35.5 million shares compared to 35.8 million shares in the prior year quarter. Billable headcount increased by 0.5% compared to the prior year quarter, with the largest increases in Corporate Finance and Restructuring, Forensic and Litigation Consulting, and Technology, which was partially offset by headcount declines in Economic Consulting and Strategic Communications. Non-billable headcount increased by 1.2% year over year. Sequentially, billable headcount decreased by 3.6%, and non-billable headcount decreased by 1.8%. The sequential decreases in headcount were primarily due to headcount actions taken across our business to better align with demand and the departures Steven mentioned in our Economic Consulting segment. Now turning to our performance at the segment level. In Corporate Finance and Restructuring, revenues of $343.6 million decreased 6.1% compared to our record first quarter '24 revenues. The decrease in revenues was primarily due to lower demand and realized bill rates for Transformation and Strategy and Restructuring services, which was partially offset by higher realized bill rates for Transaction services and an increase in success fees. In the quarter, Restructuring represented 46% of segment revenues, Transformation and Strategy represented 29% of segment revenues, and Transactions represented 25% of segment revenues. This compares to a split of 47% for Restructuring, 31% for Transformation and Strategy, and 22% for Transactions in the prior year quarter. Adjusted segment EBITDA of $55.9 million or 16.3% of segment revenues compared to $75.2 million or 20.6% of segment revenues in the prior year quarter. The decrease in adjusted segment EBITDA was primarily due to lower revenues, which was partially offset by lower compensation. Sequentially, Corporate Finance and Restructuring revenues increased 2.4% as 19.5% growth in Transactions more than offset a 3.9% decline in Transformation and Strategy and a 1.5% decline in Restructuring. Adjusted segment EBITDA increased $11.2 million sequentially primarily due to higher revenues and lower compensation. Turning to Forensic and Litigation Consulting, or FLC. Record revenues of $190.6 million increased 8.3%. Acquisition-related revenues contributed $1.3 million in the quarter. Excluding acquisition-related revenues, the increase in revenues was primarily due to higher realized bill rates for Risk and Investigation services and higher realized bill rates and demand for Data and Analytics services. We are supporting incident response readiness and regulatory compliance in cybersecurity, investigations in consumer finance, and anti-money laundering in financial services. We design and implement compliance programs related to export controls and sanctions. Adjusted segment EBITDA of $37.5 million or 19.7% of segment revenues compared to $33.7 million or 19.1% of segment revenues in the prior year quarter. The increase in adjusted segment EBITDA was primarily due to higher revenues, which was partially offset by an increase in compensation and SG&A expenses. Sequentially, FLC revenues increased 8.4% primarily due to higher Risk and Investigations and Construction Solutions revenues. Adjusted segment EBITDA increased by $19.5 million sequentially, primarily due to higher revenues and lower SG&A expenses. In Economic Consulting, revenues of $179.9 million decreased 12.1%. The decrease in revenues was primarily due to lower demand for M&A-related antitrust, financial economics, and non-M&A-related antitrust services, which was partially offset by higher realized bill rates. The departures in the competition practice in Compass Lexicon and the resulting uncertainty for that practice impacted revenue adversely, as did the reduction in the number of large mergers and acquisitions. Adjusted segment EBITDA of $14.4 million or 8% of segment revenues compared to $14.2 million or 6.9% of segment revenues in the prior year quarter. The increase in adjusted segment EBITDA was primarily due to lower compensation, which includes the impact from a 6.6% decline in billable headcount, and lower bad debt expense, which more than offset the decline in revenues. Sequentially, Economic Consultants revenues decreased 12.7% primarily due to lower demand for M&A-related antitrust services and lower realized bill rates for non-M&A related antitrust services. Adjusted segment EBITDA decreased $1.4 million sequentially, primarily due to lower revenues, which was partially offset by a decline in compensation, which includes an 8.2% decline in billable headcount and lower bad debt. Technologies revenues of $97.2 million decreased 3.5%. The decrease in revenues was primarily due to lower demand for M&A-related second request services, which was partially offset by higher demand for investigation services. Adjusted segment EBITDA of $11.6 million or 11.9% of segment revenues compared to $14.6 million or 14.5% of segment revenues in the prior year quarter. The decrease in adjusted segment EBITDA was primarily due to lower revenues, which was partially offset by lower bad debt. Sequentially, Technology revenues increased 7.2% primarily due to higher M&A-related second request services. Adjusted segment EBITDA increased $5 million sequentially, primarily due to higher revenues. Worth noting, our Technology team had several M&A-related second request matters that largely began and subsequently concluded in Q1, and we do not expect the sequential increase in M&A-related activity in Q1 to continue in Q2, given the broader market slowdown Steven spoke to. Worth noting, the federal premerger notification program administered under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act recorded just 89 transactions in March 2025, marking the lowest monthly filing total in nearly five years. To put this in perspective, this compares to a monthly average of 88 transactions in the prior twelve-month period. Strategic Communications record revenues of $87 million increased 7.2%. The increase in revenues was primarily due to a $3.5 million increase in pass-through revenues and higher demand for corporate reputation services. As we support clients with important cybersecurity, regulatory advocacy, and crisis communications needs. Adjusted segment EBITDA of $12.9 million or 14.8% of segment revenues compared to $12.4 million or 15.3% of segment revenues in the prior year quarter. The increase in adjusted segment EBITDA was primarily due to higher revenues, which was partially offset by higher pass-through expenses and an increase in compensation. Sequentially, Strategic Communications revenues were up 0.5% primarily driven by an increase in pass-through revenues. Adjusted segment EBITDA decreased $900,000 primarily due to higher pass-through expenses, which were partially offset by lower direct compensation and SG&A expenses. Let me now discuss a few cash flow and balance sheet items. As is typical, we pay the bulk of our annual bonuses in the first quarter. Net cash used in operating activities of $465.2 million compared to $274.8 million used in the prior year quarter. The year-over-year increase in net cash used in operating activities was primarily due to an increase in forgivable loan issuances, higher variable compensation, and a decrease in cash collections. Noteworthy this quarter, we funded $162 million in forgivable loans net of repayments to both retained professionals and to attract new academic affiliates. Mostly in our Economic Consulting segment. During the quarter, we repurchased 1,126,995 shares at an average price per share of $165.15 for a total cost of $186.1 million. Subsequent to quarter end, and as of 04/22/2025, we have repurchased a further 602,549 shares at an average price per share of $159.33. You may have noticed that our board of directors has authorized an additional $400 million for share repurchases. As of 04/22/2025, we had approximately $568.3 million remaining available for share repurchases under the program, including the additional amount approved by our board. Turning to guidance. As is typical, we will reevaluate guidance once we have another quarter under our belt, at the end of the second quarter, to see if any changes are warranted. Now though in aggregate, this quarter, we beat our earnings expectations. Let me share some of the considerations that impact our projections. First, our SG&A was exceptionally low this quarter, primarily due to legal settlements. We expect SG&A to be approximately $15 million to $20 million higher in each of the next two quarters than it was in Q1. Second, as I mentioned, we funded $162 million in forgivable loans net of repayments this quarter, most of which were at the end of the quarter. Amortization of these loans typically occurs over three to six years, and will begin to significantly impact adjusted EBITDA in Q2. Third, our Forensic and Litigation Consulting segment had a record quarter and has strength going into the second quarter. However, regulatory scrutiny is a key driver of this business, and to the extent that scrutiny declines amidst the changing regulatory posture in the United States, that could have a negative impact on our business going forward. Fourth, as you know, there is considerable uncertainty in the M&A market. According to Reuters, U.S. deal volume fell 13% year over year and only one mega-deal over $10 billion was announced in Q1. To the extent that M&A remains subdued, it may result in continued lower demand for our related services in Economic Consulting and Technology, and lower demand for our transaction services in Corporate Finance and Restructuring. Fifth, and conversely, very recently we have seen a pickup in restructuring matters in the United States stemming in part from tariff-induced stress. However, it is still early to say just how significant this pickup may be. Sixth, we expect that the headcount actions we took will result in cost savings of approximately $85 million in salary and benefits on an annualized basis. Offsetting a substantial portion of these savings, we have some terrific investment opportunities. We have already invested considerably this year, including announcing 31 SMB hires across the business, in addition to the 21 academic affiliates we have announced in Compass Lexicon so far this year. We expect to continue investing in areas where we see exceptional opportunities to hire talent, which typically has a negative impact on adjusted EBITDA at least through the first year after hiring. Before I close, I want to reiterate five key themes that I believe underscore the attractiveness of our business. First, this is a time of incredible disruption for our clients, and we are actively engaged in helping clients in areas such as cybersecurity, export controls and sanctions, regulatory advocacy, cryptocurrency and digital assets. Second, we are the leading restructuring practice in the world, and we are better positioned than ever before to help our clients globally. Third, despite the headwinds this year, our Economic Consulting group as a whole remains the best in the world, and as Steven mentioned, we believe the practice has been further strengthened by the addition of new academic affiliates in Compass Lexicon this year. Fourth, our enviable balance sheet allowed us to opportunistically repurchase 1.7 million shares through April 22 of this year, and we have the ability to create further shareholder value through organic headcount growth, share buybacks, and acquisitions when we see the right ones. Finally, while remaining focused on utilization, the number of talented people who want to join us is up across the board, and we continue to make investments in talent in areas such as antitrust, financial economics, transformation and strategy, healthcare, financial services, and investigations, and in geographies across the globe. With that, let's open the call up for your questions.

Ladies and gentlemen, at this time, we'll begin the question-and-answer session. To ask a question, you may press star and then one on your telephone keypad. If you are using a speakerphone, we do ask that you please pick up your handset before pressing the key. To withdraw your questions, you may press star and two. Once again, that is star and then one to join the question queue. Our first question today comes from James Yaro from Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead with your question.

Good morning and thanks for taking my questions, Steven and Ajay. Steve, just starting here on the tariffs, and the impacts on your business, could you maybe speak a little bit on which of the businesses as part of accounting that could be affected either positively or negatively by tariffs, and have you started to see any of these potential impacts thus far? I know it's early, but just an early read there.

Yes, look. I think whenever you have something, a major policy change, one of the issues is there's the first-order consequences, then there's a second and then a third-order consequence. I don't think, first of all, I don't even think everybody's absolutely certain about where the tariff thing is gonna end up, let alone the first-order, second-order, and third-order consequences. So, you know, we're in a speculation mode as everybody is on exactly. But, you know, you see things happening. You know, expert controls and sanctions, you know, our folks are involved in that. You know? Our folks are just busy as all can be. You know, supply chain people who are helping try to think about things like that. You know, there's national security issues being discussed based on some of this. There's some strategy questions. Our Stratcom people are being asked to help with communications issues and so forth. You know, the big wild card is restructuring. You know, if you're somebody who is who's totally dependent on cost of goods sold coming out of China right now, you have some stress on you. And so that I think is behind a couple of the more recent things that we that Ajay was referring to. So there's a lot of stuff. Wasn't the driver of most of the first quarter, I would say. But you see a lot of discussion and activity going on right now around a lot of different areas. Does that help, James?

It's really helpful. Thanks, Steve. Maybe just another one related to policy, and I know it's still early, but we've had a little bit more time on this one than we have had on tariffs. But perhaps you could just talk about the impact of Doge thus far on the business and perhaps with particular focus on the forensic and litigation consulting business.

So far, I would say we have not seen an effect of that. I think, abstracting from those specifically, those initiatives, as we talked about, if the thrust of this administration is to cut back regulatory enforcement on a number of key areas, that can have a pretty big effect on us. We've been one of the leaders in anti-consumer fraud issues. We have a big practice in FCPA. We have a big practice in anti-money laundering. To the extent those policies get rolled out either because of conscious decisions or because of headcount reductions, then that can have a substantial impact on us. But as you saw in FLC, which is the most likely to be affected business right now, FLC has been booming. So, you know, I think we are pretty carefully monitoring those. We think it could have a pretty substantial effect if those are maintained, and that's what we tried to telegraph here. But as of now, we can't find a huge effect on our business. You disagree, Ajay, or is that pretty much your perspective?

I would agree with that. Does that help, James?

Excellent. Thank you. And then just one last one for me. I just wanted to make sure that I understand your comments on guidance. So, is the guidance for this year that you gave at the fourth quarter 2024 earnings call still applicable, or are you saying that it has been suspended and you'll give us an update at the second quarter earnings call?

It is still applicable, James, and we will give you an update at the second quarter earnings call.

Excellent. Thank you so much.

Our next question comes from Tobey Sommer from Truist. Please go ahead with your question.

Thank you. I'd like to start on the economic segment. Now that more time has passed, can you size the revenue annualized revenue headwind from the departures and maybe give us a framework for what you think the long-term margin profile of the business looks like because there clearly are some moving parts that are difficult to assess from the outside.

Let me talk conceptually about the margin, and then I'll let Ajay decide whether we give more details on the revenue side of the stuff. Look, the business is going to have a major impact on the EBITDA. There's no question about it. I speculated certain numbers last time. I think if anything, the effect is gonna be higher. Not because the the number of departures is radically different than we were speculating against last time, and maybe a little bit because some of the retention programs that we put in place or for the people we kept, you know, there's a bit there that we may spend a little bit more than I think we expected on that. But, actually, also because of a good thing, which was that we've attracted a lot of new affiliates. And, you know, that is a great thing in the medium term. But almost always in this company, new strong people cost you money in the first year. You know, either they are new in their career and they are up-and-coming, and we're helping to attract them with a view that the hockey stick is pretty substantial over the next few years. But even with people who are established testifiers bringing theoretically big books of business, sometimes the book of business doesn't transfer immediately for a variety of reasons. And so, you know, you spend a fair amount of money, these forgivable loans that Ajay referred to. And you spend the beginning now, and some of the revenue comes later. And so this is why we're underscoring this. I mean, know, we're not underscoring this because we think this is life-threatening to the business. To the contrary, I think this is the best group of economists in the world. And I think the people we're attracting just reinforces that. But the financial hit to the bottom line is substantial. I think last time I speculated it could be $35 million versus last year. I think the number is likely to be higher than that. I don't think we have so much detail that we can get more specific than that. Okay. So that's on the bottom line impact.

I don't know how much detail we give on the revenue. So, Tobey, you already see the impact in revenue this quarter. So you already see that. In terms of the cost side, in the short term, the next few quarters, have been very explicit on the incremental, at least, forgivable loans given through this quarter. And I said they're mostly at the end of the quarter. We've said the amortization happens over three to six years. You can average it and calculate the quarterly impact. So you have the revenue, that's the incremental piece is the forgivable loans. You already saw the headcount coming off in the first quarter with the ensuing savings there. So you have all the piece parts. Already. And our guidance that is in place has a range of outcomes that Steve mentioned as already incorporated in that range. Okay.

So, the new hires, sometimes the matters or the revenue comes later. Does the first quarter capture all of the revenue that sort of was attached to the departing employees?

Sorry for any confusion. Let's be clear about that. Most of the departing people departed towards the end of the quarter. So, no, it didn't. I mean, now we also had market slowdowns and other factors in that first quarter, but no. The revenue impact of departing employees really starts to show up more in the second, third quarter. But the first quarter also had some other headwinds in it. So it's hard to know delta. Right? And further, there's obviously a disrupted practice. So to that extent, yes, as I said explicitly in my remarks, it's a combination of factors. Market departures, which as Steve said happened towards the end, but also the disruption in the practice.

Thank you. Clearly, the new hires come over time.

Thank you. Could you talk about trends in your healthcare business within FLC? What did you experience there in the quarter, and what's the outlook for the year?

Yeah, it's been good. I mean, we have good practice with a couple of different healthcare practices, performance improvement within CF and then the more regulatory-oriented one in FLC. It's been good. Both had good businesses this quarter. I don't know what else you want to say about that, Ajay.

Yes, and particularly so, Tobey, because last year, they were somewhat weak. So the year-over-year comparisons show up more, which is what we've talked about.

And then if I could ask a follow-up on the regulatory question. You can't predict, what the changes will be and what the effects will be going forward. But could you size for us the parts of the business or maybe proportion of business that is regulator-led investigations and the like?

Oh, that's a difficult one to answer. At the end of the day, regulators are involved in every investigation, so there's a regulatory aspect to it. But whether it is the federal or the state regulation that would take precedence, is speculative. Of course, we're only talking about the United States. There are also regulators in Europe and other geographies. So that's one is really an impossible one for me to answer. All I can tell you is our practitioners, whilst we got a bit anticipatory for obvious reasons, our practitioners remain very positive in the business.

Okay. Last one for me. Ajay, could you give us some color on the headcount actions? Maybe color on the distribution of segments, geographies, split between back office versus fee generators, that kind of thing? Thank you.

Sure, sure, sure. Look, it's all laid out in the 10-Q in terms of the breakdown by segment. And I don't remember all those numbers off the top of my head. But what I will tell you, it's about 400 plus folks between, you know, Q4 and Q1. It is spread across all levels. In fact, remarkably, proportional to the mix we have in buildable side, it's remarkably evenly spread, the same proportions as we have seniors versus juniors. Perhaps a little bit more weighted on the senior side. And a smaller on the non-billable side. And it's across the globe. As you know, we have most of our people in the United States and EMEA. It's a little bit more in EMEA than in the United States. But otherwise, it's across the globe.

Our next question comes from Andrew Nicholas from William Blair. Please go ahead with your question.

Hi, good morning. Thank you for taking my question. I wanted to ask first on the restructuring business. Sounds like you've seen a little bit of incremental stress in the system the past couple weeks. The question I want to ask is just around kind of the bifurcation in that market between liability management and your traditional Chapter 11 bankruptcy activity. Is there any shift from what you can tell in preference for one route or the other right now? And understanding that it's difficult to predict the future, do you think the next couple months or quarters in this specific environment might skew one way versus the other relative to what you've seen in a couple of years?

So there's quite a few questions embedded in that one. I found an interesting statistic the other day that what S&P reported that last quarter, 42% of the bankruptcies were repeat bankruptcies. So liability management doesn't always work. In fact, that creates a market in the future for restructuring. Well, we hope our clients do well, but typically taking on more debt if you already have high leverage with unsecured positions doesn't necessarily get you out of trouble. And we can see evidence of that already. Where the fault line is running through working capital with these stretched assets, and because the working capital is getting increased with the tariffs and you don't get realized value. So how and if you're extremely over-levered to begin with, how that can be solved through liability management beats me. So this is a serious challenge that is creating a demand, and we bring a whole slew of services from cost-cutting to changing supply channels to transactions and, in the ultimate analysis, restructuring to the equation.

That's helpful. Thank you. And then kind of going back to Economic Consulting, Ajay, you cited some statistics on the HSR kind of deal counts. And I apologize if you outlined this already. But just to clarify, is that primarily a regulatory-driven slowdown, or are there other kind of macro dynamics that already show up in that figure? Just trying to get a sense for overall backdrop excluding some of the Compass Lexicon-specific headwinds.

No, no, no. The biggest backdrop is uncertainty. It's people freeze when they don't know, and it's the tariffs more than the regulatory. People freeze when they don't know which way things are going to come down. And that shows up in M&A. At least that's our supposition.

Great. And then maybe one last question. Obviously, dealing with some of the departures in Compass Lexicon, there's specific headwinds within that segment. But I'm curious, are there any kind of ripple effects that you expect from some of the lost revenue there to other parts of your business? I know in the past you've talked about having some success driving additional cross-sell between Econ and Technology or CFR and Stratcom. I'm just kind of curious outside of what's isolated to that segment, if there's anything that you'd say there.

Thank you. So two things. First, those range of outcomes that one can reasonably foresee related to either Economic Consulting, Compass specifically or second, third order are in our guidance. So that's number one. Number two, this could be unique. There is no such expectation of this being cross-border, but there could be some, but I wouldn't read too much into it.

Again, there are no other questions. I just want to say thank you for your continued attention. Look, as we all know, the world is filled with uncertainty. And as we talked about individual businesses of ours can be affected by those uncertainties negatively or positively. You know, I'll just come back to the general point. There's a unique constellation of uncertainties today. But the notion that our business has surged and soared through periods of uncertainty in the past is the thing I would come back to. And in fact, our company exists to help companies, in the face of the deepest uncertainty. Does it mean you can't have a pause for a while or a big effect on one business or another and you can always have cost issues as you're stabilizing a business that has some departures and stuff like that. Nothing about the current uncertainty changes my fundamental conviction that this company is closer to the beginning of its journey than the end. So we look forward to being on that journey with all of you. Thank you very much.