ELF - NYSE

Thank you for joining us today to discuss e.l.f. Beauty’s, First Quarter Fiscal ‘23 Results. I’m KC Katten, Vice President of Corporate Development & Investor Relations. With me today are Tarang Amin, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; and Mandy Fields, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. We encourage you to tune into our webcast presentation for the best viewing experience, which you can access on our website at investor.elfbeauty.com. Since many of our remarks today contain forward-looking statements, please refer to our earnings release and reports filed with the SEC, where you’ll find factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements. In addition, the company’s presentation today includes information presented on a non-GAAP basis. Our earnings release contains reconciliations of the differences between the non-GAAP presentation and the most directly comparable GAAP measure. With that, let me turn the webcast over to Tarang.

Thank you, KC, and good afternoon everyone. Today, we will discuss the drivers of our Q1 results and our raised outlook for fiscal ‘23. I want to start by recognizing the e.l.f. Beauty team. We’re off to a strong start in our new fiscal year delivering Q1 results well ahead of expectations. Q1 marked our 14th consecutive quarter of net sales growth. We grew net sales by 26%, increase gross margin by 390 basis points and delivered $32 million in adjusted EBITDA up 46%. Given our momentum, we’re raising our full year guidance. Color Cosmetics category trends remain positive in Q1 up 4% year-over-year fueled by an increase in usage occasions and innovation. Q1 was the first full quarter of growth above pre-pandemic levels. e.l.f. cosmetic consumption and Q1 was even stronger, up 27% well above category growth rates. We were the fastest growing top five brand by a wide margin, growing our market share by 120 basis points. Looking ahead, the environment continues to be dynamic. While it’s difficult to forecast how inflation or recession may impact consumer behavior, we believe cosmetic continues to be an important category for self expression. Mass cosmetics in particular has performed better than prestige in past recessionary times. More importantly, we’re confident in our business model and ability to continue to gain share. Let me take a few minutes to talk through the key drivers of our Q1 performance. First, we’re known for our core value proposition. We make the best of beauty accessible to every eye, lip and face. We have a unique ability to deliver holy grail products, taking inspiration from our community and the best products in prestige and bringing them to the market at extraordinary value. Some of our best selling holy grails include our Poreless Putty Primer $10 versus a prestige comparison at $52. Our Camo concealers of $7 versus a prestige comparison at $30 and our Camo CC cream at $15 versus a prestige comparison at $42. We see the current backdrop as a time to reinforce our unique value proposition. The average price point for e.l.f. is a little over $5 today as to compared to nearly $9 for legacy mass cosmetics brands. And unlike these higher priced products, our pricing strategy focuses on everyday value instead of broad based promotions. In the coming months, we’ll launch another consumer facing campaign that highlights extraordinary value of our products. The second driver of our performance is that we’re an innovation powerhouse. Our superpowers center on our ability to deliver 100% cruelty free, clean, premium quality beauty products at accessible price points with broad appeal. Our proven innovation engine has built leadership across five core segments; brushes, primers, concealers, brows and sponges make up approximately half of e.l.f. cosmetic sales with the number one or two position in all five segments and gain share in each segment in Q1. We believe our innovation pipeline has never been stronger. We continue to focus on fewer bigger bolder innovation and try to have one or two new holy grails each season. We’re pleased to see four of our newer products resonating with consumers. Our power grip primer, big mood mascara, glossy lip stain and Camo powder foundation were four of our top five drivers of incremental unit consumption in Q1. With our product success, we see a significant opportunity to build share. Look at in Nielsen track channel data for Q1, we’re the number five cosmetics brand with a 6.6% share. The number one brand has 17% share. We see a lot of runway for growth. Third, we know how to attract and engage consumers with our disruptive digital first marketing. Over the past three years, we’ve increased our marketing investment from 7% of net sales to 16%. Our marketing investment is working, driving ROI multiples above industry benchmarks. Our marketing initiatives help us reach new audiences, penetrate new platforms, and test and learn a new frontiers. We’re pushing further into gaming and the metaverse which resonates strongly with our young, diverse community. In July, we launched Game Up a limited edition cosmetics and skincare collection that sits at the intersection of gaming and beauty. Each Game Up product contains a secret code that can be redeemed for beauty squad bonus points, gift cards and more incentivizing signups for our beauty squad loyalty program. Beauty squad now has over 3 million members with enrollment growing nearly 20% year-over-year. We still see a significant opportunity to bring new consumers to the e.l.f. brand. Our most recent attitude and usage study shows a double digit gap in our unaided consumer awareness compared to some of the legacy mass cosmetics brands. We’ve galvanized a strong following among Gen

Thank you Tarang. I am pleased to share the highlights of our first quarter results as well as our raised outlook for fiscal ‘23. We started our fiscal year significantly outperforming the category. Our first quarter net sales grew 26% year-over-year primarily driven by broad base strength across our national and international retailers. As Tarang spoke about, we saw better than expected elasticities from our recent price increase in the quarter. In fact, our consumption growth in Q1 was balanced between increases in both AUR and units. Importantly, our ongoing consumption trends continue to be well balanced, supported by strength in both our core products and recent innovation. Our digitally led strategy continues to serve us well. Q1 digital consumption trends were up over 30% year-over-year. Digital channels drove 14% of our total consumption in Q1 as compared to 13% a year ago. Gross margin of 68% was up approximately 390 basis points compared to prior year. We saw gross margin benefits from price increases, cost savings and margin a creative mix. These gross margin benefits more than offset the impact of elevated transportation costs we experienced in the quarter. On an adjusted basis, SG&A as a percentage of sales was 45% compared to 47% last year. Marketing and digital investment for the quarter was approximately 16% of net sales flat to a year ago and was lower than expected due to a timing shift in spend out of Q1 and into Q2. We continue to expect marketing and digital investment to be approximately 17% to 19% of net sales in fiscal ‘23. Q1 adjusted EBITDA was 32 million up 46% versus last year and adjusted EBITDA margin was approximately 26% of net sales. Adjusted net income was 21 million, or $0.39 per diluted share, compared to 14 million or $0.27 per diluted share a year ago. The increase across profitability metrics was driven by our strong sales growth, improved gross margin and a shift in timing for marketing and digital investments. Our liquidity remains strong with a combination of our cash balance and access to our revolving credit facility sitting at approximately $172 million. We ended the quarter with 72 million in cash on hand, compared to a cash balance of 63 million a year ago. Our ending inventory balance was $70 million down from 85 million in March. As Tarang mentioned, our ending inventory levels in Q1 were a bit lighter than expected given our strong sell through rates. We expect inventory levels to build back in Q2 as is typical with our quarterly seasonality. Importantly, we remain confident in our ability to meet consumer demand. We expect our cash priorities for the coming year to remain on investing behind our five strategic imperatives and supporting strategic extensions. Now let’s turn to our raised outlook for fiscal ‘23. For the full year, we now expect net sales growth of approximately 14% to 16% versus prior year up from 10% to 12% previously. We expect adjusted EBITDA between $83.5 million to $85 million, up from $80.5 million to $82 million previously. We expect adjusted net income between $47 million and $48.5 million up from $43.5 million to $45.5 million previously. And adjusted EPS of $0.84 to $0.87 per diluted share up from $0.78 to $0.81 previously. We expect our fiscal ‘23 adjusted tax rate to be approximately 25% to 26% as compared to 27% to 28% previously. Lastly, we continue to expect a fully diluted share count of approximately 56 million shares. Let me provide you with additional color on our planning assumptions for fiscal ‘23. Starting with top line, our raised outlook reflects the outperformance in Q1 relative to our expectations in addition to pipeline related to the incremental space gains Tarang discussed. We continue to expect double digit top line growth in each quarter of fiscal ‘23. Turning to gross margin, we now expect our gross margin to be up approximately 100 basis points year-over-year as compared to our expectation for flat to slightly up previously. This is largely a result of our outperformance in Q1. We expect the combination of price increases, margin accretive mix and cost savings to offset elevated transportation costs. Turning now to adjusted EBITDA, our outlook now implies adjusted EBITDA growth of approximately 12% to 14% versus prior year, up from approximately 8% to 10% previously, and on top of the strong 22% growth in fiscal ‘22. Overall, we are quite pleased to be in a position to raise our profitability outlook in a dynamic macro environment this early in our fiscal year. Like many companies, we do expect cost pressures to weigh on adjusted EBITDA margin this year. Our outlook therefore continues to bake in cost inflation with a non marketing SG&A including higher outbound fuel and logistics costs and addition to the higher inbound transportation costs captured in gross margin. From a cadence perspective, we expect balance of year adjusted EBITDA margins to be in the mid teens, largely due to our normal quarterly seasonality. We expect Q2 to be lower than that due to the shift in marketing spend out of Q1 and into Q2. In summary, we are pleased with our outstanding Q1 results and remain confident in our ability to grow market share for the balance of the fiscal year. Our performance both on an absolute basis and relative to the category demonstrates how our competitive advantages are driving results. With that operator, you may open the call to questions.

Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Dara Mohsenian with Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.

Obviously very strong results in fiscal Q1. Just given the consumer environment out there the tenuous state of the consumer and variability, can you give us a bit of an update on what you’re seeing for the mass color category in the U.S. in general in July, as well as for your business? An update will be helpful. Thanks.

Hi Dara it’s Tarang. Overall, were quite bullish on the category. The Q1 was the first full quarter where the category was above pre-pandemic levels. We are particularly well positioned within that category. I think we built 120 basis points of market share, have very strong consumption. I’d say it’s still volatile month to month. We started, say the quarter very strong. We saw a few lighter weeks, end of June, beginning of July. And now we’re seeing strong consumption rates again. So I think while you might see some bouncing around overall, we’re quite bullish on the category going forward. And as we said in our prepared remarks, mass color cosmetics tends to perform better even in recessionary environments than prestige. So we’re still pretty bullish on the category, but especially so on our prospects.

Great, that’s helpful. And then could you just update us on the competitive environment in two respects? A, have you seen competitors take price increases and B, your view of shelf space opportunities? Obviously, the market share results have been very strong for your portfolio. And as you mentioned, you’ve got a portfolio that offers a lot of value in that $5 range. So I would think you’d be front and center for retailers worried about trade down. So maybe just talk about shelf space opportunity versus a typical offer. Obviously, you mentioned a couple of specific opportunities in terms of CVS and Superdrug, but just overall put shelf space in perspective versus if you’re in that, again, the pricing environment you’re seeing. Thanks.

So first of all, your question on pricing, we have seen average unit retails increase. It’s hard for us to tease out how much of that is pricing versus innovation mix with new items. But we definitely have seen an increase in average unit retails. As you say we’re positioned extremely well. Our average unit retails around $5 compared to many of our competitors around $9 gives superior value proposition. But that value proposition isn’t only relative to mass competitors. We are seeing some trade down from prestige. We have a number of holy grail products, what we uniquely can do in terms of bringing prestige quality, extraordinary price points, an example being our Power Grip primer, which is our top selling item right now at $10 compares to prestige item at $34. So we feel we’re benefiting from both trade down as well as trading to the brand from the mass side. And then in terms of shelf space opportunities, I think we’re extremely well-positioned. We talked about the space that we’re gaining at CVS both this fall and in the spring as well as Superdrug and the currency that which retailers looked by to make space decisions we are well-positioned. We are the most productive brand Wal-Mart and Target carry our innovation pipeline. It’s never been stronger, as well as the consumer profile we bring in. So I think we’ve had a pretty good track record over the years of picking up space and I would expect that to continue.

Our next question from Olivia Tong with Raymond James. Please go ahead.

Great, thanks. Good afternoon. And congratulations on some great results. I wanted to ask you a little bit about your product initiative plans for this year. Obviously innovation particularly at the more premium end for you, but a great value for your consumers has really driven some nice AUR improvement. So just wanted to understand a little bit more about your product initiatives for this year to keep that momentum going. And then your view on holiday we obviously have a bit of a volatile consumer environment right now. It seems like you are quite frankly, benefiting to some extent from the volatile environment as you’re seeing some trade down from Prestige side. So just your view on those two would be great. Thank you.

On the innovation pipeline. thing I feel extremely good about our innovation. As you mentioned our ability to have these holy grail products that compare to Prestige, but are much better values I think is serving as well. We’ve had a number of really good hits this year. The most recent being just a couple of weeks ago, we launched a Halo glow liquid filter, which is priced at $14. So higher on the e.l.f. price range, but it compares to iconic Prestige product $44. And we’ve seen incredible response to that item. In fact, four of the shades are currently out of stock and we’re getting more stock on those. And so I feel really good about our overall product pipeline, as well as the plans to continue to have these holy grails going forward. And then in terms of holiday, I would say our strategy and holidays very similar to last year. Last year, because of the container imbalance, we made the choice to have a much smaller holiday program to prioritize our core items. That strategy served us well. We saw really strong consumption amongst our core everyday great value items, also picked up margin in the process. And we’re going to continue that strategy this year. The focus really is continuing to meet the consumer demand we have against the core e.l.f. cosmetics as well as e.l.f. skin brands.

Great, thanks. And then just a follow up, do you have a sense of how much of your customer base on some of the sort of double digit price point product items is your existing consumers trading up and finding great value because in some, as far as your products and not being able to reach sort of the more premium price points as opposed to maybe some of the Prestige customers now trading into your product finding some really interesting value there?

Yes, we have a combination of both. So I think even in our pricing strategy, where we took prices up on two thirds of our SKU given the transportation costs, we kept prices unchanged on our opening price point items, $2, $3 items, so it gives a good entry point for anyone entering into the e.l.f. franchise. We do see once a consumer enters in the franchise, they are trying a broader assortment of our e.l.f. products. And then from a Prestige side, we’re definitely seeing new users being attracted to the brand that perhaps normally would not look at lower priced products. The Halo Glow liquid filter is a prime example of that. Immediately consumers made the comparison to the Prestige equivalent at $44. And it brought in quite a few new users on elfcosmetics.com into the franchise. So I think we’re benefiting from both as consumers come into the franchise being able to go across the basket not only in cosmetics, but also an e.l.f. Skin, and then attracting those Prestige consumers that see the tremendous value that we can offer at the quality.

Our next question comes from Steph Wissink with Jefferies. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good morning everybody. [Indiscernible] My question for you is on e.l.f Skin. Just talk a little bit about the learnings that you’ve had graduating the brand into a new category. I think you mentioned some of the changes in merchandising and packaging, but what you envision for the opportunity set for skin over the course of the next couple of years? And Mandy, my question for you is just on the marketing expense in the second fiscal quarter. Could you help us to square up that amount that shifted from Q1 into Q2? Thank you.

Sure. So hi, Steph. e.l.f. skin, we see a huge opportunity. As you know, global skincare is bigger than global color cosmetics, and we’re winning in skin. In track channels, our consumption in the quarter in skin was up 17% versus a category that was up 5%. In terms of where we’re seeing the growth, it really comes down to two sources. The first is our current e.l.f. cosmetics consumers. 85% of them are interested in trying e.l.f. skin, we’re definitely seeing baskets being built on e.l.f. skin. But the second is really attracting new consumers to the franchise. We have holy grails on e.l.f. skin just like we do on e.l.f. color cosmetics. In fact, our top selling skincare item for the quarter was one of our holy grails our holy hydration cleansing balm, which retails for $11 compares to a prestige equivalent of $36. So we very much see the same model working in skin that we’ve had working in color cosmetics. The difference I would say is what I’m particularly excited about is the level of education we can do. We have cleaned formulations that are dermatologist developed in our ability for the first time this quarter to put on awareness building digital advertising on e.l.f. skincare. I think it has me excited about the future prospects that along with the continual pipeline of holy grails I think it’s a pretty good formula for us for the future. And then in terms of how big it can get, I don’t think we’ve disclosed that. I think the best proxy we have is in track channels e.l.f. skins about 8% of our consumption yet online at elfcosmetics.com and Amazon is closer to 20%. So we still have a lot of runway before we run out a CMO that by any means.

And that to answer your question on marketing. So we continue to target the 17% to 19% range on the year from a marketing and digital perspective. Obviously in Q1, we’re a little bit lower than that range. But I would say that the guidance I would give us for the year to still target that 17% to 19%.

Our next question comes from [Indiscernible] with Cowen. Please go ahead.

Thanks for taking my call or my question and congrats on strong quarter. One question on retail execution going into the back to school season. Could you speak to the promotional environment and your strategy within the category?

Sure, so our strategy is quite different than many of our competitors. We are in every day, great value on shelf. So we do not rely on the level of promotions that many of our competitors do. In fact, we do not even have the trade funds that many of them have. We feel like we offer great value every single day. And even when retailers promote our brand, we ask them to do so at full retail. So the model is fundamentally different. I think it has served as well through 14 consecutive quarters of net sales growth. In terms of back to school, I think we’re seeing good results on back to school. I haven’t necessarily seen a higher level of promotion for this years on back to school. But like I said, promotion doesn’t really matter as much to us as our presentation in store and that everyday value that we offer.

Great, thank you for the additional color.

Our next question comes from Linda Bolton-Weiser with D.A. Davidson. Please go ahead.

Yes, hi I think I know the answer to this question. But I just want to check on being that we’re hearing about inventory reductions by Wal-Mart, Target many retailers, quite frankly. Is this affecting you at all? Or are you just having so much momentum in your consumption growth that you’re not really seeing any issues with this? Just what are you seeing on that front?

Hi, Linda, our consumption has been strong for a very long time. So the biggest challenge we have is making sure that we’re staying in stock. So much of what we’ve heard in terms of inventory reductions, etc haven’t played as much into our business just given the strong momentum we have and making sure that we stay in stock.

And then when you talk about the disparity, the difference in consumption, the percentage of your consumption, in store versus online, the 8% versus the 20%. Is that the case for the overall skin versus color categories as well. Also, therefore, it’s not really that you’re different from the category, or is there some anomaly that does stand out just for your brand? Thanks.

Yes I’m not as familiar with the overall category numbers, I think those are would be more in line. But I don’t have that data. I just know for us, as we map where we stand from a retail distribution standpoint, versus having our full assortment online, that’s really the difference will be the anomaly for us. We just don’t have as much of our skincare in retail as we do online. And when we have it available, consumers are naturally migrating to it.

And then finally, when you talk about these five core categories that are more than 50% of your sales, I’m just wondering strategically, would you like to have a sixth in that list? Or do you think that focusing kind of with your spending, and strategies on those five core is the best return that you get on your investment? Thanks.

Well, we’d love to have as many categories as possible to have the number one or two position in. I would say the strategy that we followed is to really build these holy grail products in each of the segments, and then follow those up with continued innovation. So primers is one of the categories we have clear market leadership in. We started that journey many years ago with our $6 Poreless, primer, that compared to prestige item that was $36. we could have rested on our laurels with that that was such an incredible product. But we follow that up with additional innovation. So our Poreless Putty Primer continue to build shear and primers. We followed up our Poreless Putty Primer with our Power Grip Primers. And so you’ve had this continual innovation in those core categories. This very same factor was true in our other key leadership categories of brushes, brows, concealers and sponges. We are prospecting other bigger categories. So some of our more recent moves is making a bigger push into mascaras, and foundations; the top two categories within color cosmetics, and we’re making progress there, our share position is still small, but we feel we can apply that same model to other categories, just as we’re doing to skincare.

Our next question comes from Bill Chappell with Truist Securities. Please go ahead.

Thanks. Good afternoon. I apologize if I missed this, but when you’re looking at kind of expanded retail distribution over the next year, didn’t know if, bankruptcy or financial troubles of certain players that have large swaths of space opens up more space quickly, or if it’s more methodical, and then also as you’re expanding, I mean, I think you said it’s multiple retailers, but I didn’t know if it’s kind of an expansion at the traditional or not the core, Target Wal-Mart, Delta, or if you’re really starting to push some space into new and different retailers be it Clover, be it alternative channels.

So I would say, Bill, that the financial troubles of other players often open up opportunities for us. So the extent of retailers worried about a particular brand, I think it certainly is an opportunity. On the other hand, to the extent that they get better financially perhaps it can be a good competitor, which we’d welcome. We’d like every, every core competitor to do well, because as it brings in more consumer interests in the category our value equation comes shining through. Historically, I’d say our space is probably less dependent on whether another competitor is struggling or not, but more in terms of what we’re delivering retailer. And that’s actually been the better formula for us. And so right now, we stand in really strong position, both with our productivity, innovation and consumer profile that is opening up the door for more space. And then in terms of the nature where that space is coming from it varies each year. And so I think this particular, I’m particularly excited right now about the expansion that we have going on at CVS and Superdrug. Historically, we were stronger, much stronger in Target, Wal-Mart, even Ulta Beauty and had a relatively low penetration within drug. So to the extent that we start expanding better within drug that’s a massive opportunity for us, just given the number of the door counts that they have. And then I think Keys SoulCare gives us an opportunity with other alternate retailers as well. So we talked last quarter, our first entry into Sephora, Canada was Keys Soulcare as we looked to continue to expand that brand as well. And then similarly with W3LL PEOPLE. W3LL PEOPLE gives us an opening within retailers that want the highest standard of clean beauty, and we’re making progress, expanding distribution on that brand, we talked about taking into a subset of Ulta doors. We feel there’s a lot of opportunity at Target and other retailers that care about clean beauty to also expand that brand.

No, that’s helpful. And then one, just can you just go back and remind us and again, I’m sorry, if you’ve covered this, but kind of the impact of tariffs on your gross margin and what may happen, if there’s any relief down the road?

Sure, Bill, I’ll take that. So we have talked about carrying about 1000 basis points of cost headwinds and our gross margin, and tariffs is roughly half of that. The rest of it sits in FX and transportation costs. And so sort of roll back we would certainly flow a portion of that through to our adjusted EBITDA margins, as we talked about it would be a tailwind for us from a gross margin and EBITDA margin standpoint. But too early to tell what’s going to happen there. We are still waiting to hear if that’s going to roll back or not.

Our next question comes from Rupesh Parikh with Oppenhimer. Please go ahead.

Good afternoon. Thanks for taking my question. So first, first on gross margins. So I know you raise your gross margin outlook versus the prior expectations. But I was just curious why would gross margin gains decelerate versus what you saw in Q1? Because I think you’d also get some more FX benefits sometime later this year.

Yes. So gross margin, we’re really pleased to have taken our outlook up for the year up 100 basis points versus where we were previously at flat to slightly up. In the quarter, we did get benefits from pricing, I would say was the largest help to gross margin. But we still saw cost pressure from ocean freight transportation costs, things of that nature. And so given that it’s this early in the year, we want to take a prudent approach to our gross margin, wait and see how things shape out for the year, but really pleased to see the performance that we had in Q1.

And then maybe just one follow up question. So as you look at your U.S. retailers, I was just curious if you’re seeing any changes in trends at your different retailers versus what you’ve seen in recent quarters.

Our consumption continues to be quite strong. And I think I know some of the retailers have reported on their overall performance. But even in the context of that beauty has been a bright spot for them. So I feel beauty is a bright spot for them. And we’re particularly well-positioned within each of those retailers.

Our next question comes from Mark Astrachan with Stifel. Please go ahead.

Afternoon, everyone. Wanted to first quickly ask a follow up Mandy to the last question. So are there costs that you’re anticipating to be worse in fiscal 2Q and fiscal 1Q?

Yes, so again, as we think about the cost pressures that we’re facing, from a transportation standpoint, we continue to expect those to be elevated for the balance of the year, which is why the balance of the year gross margin forecast is projected to be flat to prior year. We want to see how those continue to come in. I felt one quarter in too early to call how that’s going to materialize for the year. So that’s why we’ve taken that approach.

And then secondly, more broadly just asking about skincare sales data getting that that’s not obviously the entire business in dollars roughly flat sequentially in the June quarter versus the March quarter up a little bit versus the December quarter. I guess some a seasonality but I’m curious if space constraints potentially are hurting that and how much of like the incremental space that you’re talking about is anticipated to go to skincare versus the overall business meaning that you had an opportunity would you be allocating more of a to skincare skincare going to be incremental in the skincare section versus in the makeup section. So any sort of color there would be helpful.

Good. So Mark our overall consumption trends in skincare actually quite strong. There is some seasonality quarter-to-quarter if I take a look at June quarter typically isn’t as big as some of the other quarters in skincare. So I would say we feel great about the conception as I mentioned, in fact, channels 17% versus a category at 5%. Certainly space has been a constraint. We would like to get more of our assortment on skincare more of our innovation more broadly distributed. So as we pick up more space, it’s always a balance between what we’re putting behind color and what we’re putting behind skin. And I think we have been doing a pretty good job of putting more skincare assortment in, but we have a lot further to go. And I think that will be somewhat dependent on how fast we can accelerate our space expansion.

Our next question from Korinne Wolfmeyer with Piper Sandler. Please go ahead.

Hi, good afternoon. Thanks for taking the questions and congrats on the quarter. So I’d like to just push you a little bit more on the market share gains that you’ve been mentioning. And can you just provide any further thoughts on where these are coming from? How much is really coming from people trading down from the prestige category versus people coming over from other mass brands? Do you have any color on is it coming from certain age groups or income levels? Just any color here would be helpful? Thank you.

Yes, so first of all, Korean the market share gains are in the mass Nielsen tract universe. So it would not include any of the trade down from prestige. The market share gains are from our other competitors in the mass cosmetics category that are tracked by Nielsen. And then in terms of where those share gains are, I mean, I think you can take a look at Nielsen yourself in terms of who’s losing share and who’s gaining share. But it’s pretty broad array of brands that we’re taking share from. And that’s pretty consistent with what you’ve seen over the last three years. We’ve had a pretty good track record of gaining share, I think the only brand I’m aware of in the top five, this game share three years in a row to the magnitude that we have. And so there’s quite a few players where we’re trading in from into the franchise from and then the point on prestige, you’re not going to see that in the track channel data. But we can see it in terms of when we bring in new consumers, what were they buying before on elfcosmetics.com. And certainly, we’re also an Ulta Beauty, which is not part of the track channel universe that has both prestige and mass. And so we get some insights there both in terms of our own consumer data, as well as what we see from some of the retailers. So I think the great news for us is our value proposition plays in both arenas in the mass and we’re continue to pick up share from mass competitors, and then from the prestige side or holy grails really do allow us to be able to offer a much better value equation than what someone can get in prestige.

That’s helpful. Thank you. And then lastly, on international, I know, it’s still a fairly small part of the business, but a big part of the growth story here. So I’m just curious with everything going on overseas, and in the macro environment, how are you thinking about growth in the International part of the business this year? Should we expect similar level to what we saw last year? And then over the coming years, how should we be thinking about the geographic mix between U.S. and O-U.S. over the next couple years? Thank you.

So our growth has been really strong and international. In Q1, our international business grew 40%. So above our overall growth rates. And that primarily has been on the backs of two main countries Canada, where we’re now the number seven position brand and the UK, which I mentioned, we’re continuing to pick up more space. So I see a lot more growth both within Canada and the UK, primary two countries in international. International in Q1 represented about 13% of our sales. That’s up from about 11% last year. So we are picking up a greater percentage, but I think we have a long way to go. Western Europe is still mainly open to us our main presence in Western Europe is really Sookie SilkAir, I think we have a great deal of opportunity in other markets. And then the approach is going to be the same disciplined rollout approach to finding the right retail partner combining with our strength digitally just as we’ve done both in Canada and the UK. And I think there are many more countries you can do with probably the first focus being Western Europe.

This concludes the question and answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Tarang Amin for any closing remarks.

Well, thank you for joining us today everyone. I’m so grateful for our incredible team at e.l.f. Beauty for again delivering an outstanding results to start fiscal ‘23. We look forward to seeing some of you at our upcoming investor meetings and speaking with you in November when we discuss our second quarter results. Thank you and be well.