Thanks, Anthony. Hello, everyone and welcome. Today, we want to cover 3 things: first, our full year 2024 adjusted EBITDA target which remains unchanged; second, our Q3 financial performance which, while below our expectations, should be trending upward in light of improving market conditions; and third, our business transformation which we expect to generate an even higher benefit than we had previously targeted. Before we delve into our substantive comments and in light of the recent election, we would like to thank EPA administrator, Michael Regan and his team, with whom we have worked closely over the past 4 years. We look forward to working with President-Elect Trump's transition team and the newly appointed administrator when they are approved by the U.S. Senate. While the EPA is our primary regulator, we also view the agency as a trusted partner. American Vanguard has worked well with the EPA through numerous administrations and we look forward to continuing this relationship. Now, turning to our financial results and our business outlook, I'd like to start by stating that we are reiterating our 2024 adjusted EBITDA target of $40 million to $50 million and our sales target of $565 million to $580 million, excluding product recall charges. We remain focused on transforming our company into an efficient, reliable and profitable supplier to the ag industry. Our mission, as always, begins with putting our customers first and focusing every day on how best to serve them. The important initiatives we are driving across this company start with the customer at the center of each effort and are designed to improve our internal capabilities, raise productivity and efficiency and drive higher returns across our business, all of which will position this company for future growth. Mark Bassett will provide further details on our business transformation later in the call. Let's take a moment to discuss the broader farm economy. The downturn in the agricultural economy over the past 18 months was driven by weaker commodity prices and the reverberations that this caused in commercial behavior across the ag sector. More recently, we have begun to see greater market normalization with some emerging pockets of strength or green shoots beginning to emerge that just gives us a sense of optimism for the future. While the industry seems to have moved past the deep destocking phase which impacted the previous 12 to 18 months, some distribution partners continue to be conservative in accumulating inventory, preferring to make purchases closer to the planting time. We expect this cautious attitude to be in place as we move into 2025. Additionally, pressure from generics, particularly in connection with our cotton defoliant and within our LatAm and Brazil markets continues to exert downward pressure on the market. The industry will also need to work through existing channel inventories of agricultural commodities. This effort will be aided, however, by a strong harvest season. Despite an uneven market overall, the fourth quarter is typically a seasonally strong period for American Vanguard and the broader crop protection industry which we expect to be the case again this year. Our products that are used earlier in the planting season typically see a heightened level of demand during this period as these buying patterns are less sensitive to cyclical or even commodity price-driven factors but are instead driven by the seasonal crop cycle each year of planting and harvesting periods. Products such as our granular soil insecticides, Index insecticide and Impact herbicide [ph] should benefit from this normal non-cyclical behavior in the fourth quarter. Turning to a top-level view of our financial performance. During the third quarter of 2024, the company generated adjusted EBITDA of $2 million compared to $11 million in the year ago period on sales of $130.7 million, excluding non-recurring charges, compared to $149.5 million in the year ago period. All of the year-over-year decline in sales can be attributed to Aztec, a granular soil insecticide and Folex, a cotton defoliant in the U.S. More specifically, over 90% of the year-over-year decline in total adjusted revenue was due to lower Aztec sales as the year ago period saw atypical buying activity for this product in the quarter following a period of supply interruption. David will provide more detail on this comparison in a moment but I think it's worth noting that when looking at year-over-year revenue, excluding Aztec, revenue was essentially flat year-over-year. Finally, I would like to address our CEO search. The Board of Directors has been actively interviewing candidates and is focused on getting a new CEO up and running to build on the momentum created by our interim office of the CEO. And with that, I will turn the call over to David.