ZBRA - NASDAQ

Good day, and welcome to the Third Quarter 2025

Good morning, and welcome to

Thank you, Mike. Good morning, and thank you for joining us. Our team executed well in the third quarter, delivering results above our outlook driven by solid demand, lower-than-expected tariffs and strong operating expense leverage. For the quarter, we realized sales of $1.3 billion, a 5% increase from the prior year, and adjusted EBITDA margin of 21.6%, a 20 basis point improvement, and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share of $3.88, which was 11% higher than the prior year. We realized solid growth in our Asia Pacific, Latin America and North America regions and had relative outperformance in printing, mobile computing and RFID. Our retail and e-commerce end market was a bright spot. Healthcare cycled a strong compare and manufacturing remained relatively soft. We achieved double-digit earnings growth by driving operational efficiencies as we continue to invest in our leading portfolio of solutions. While we see growth across most of our business, our customers continue to navigate in uncertain macro environment, resulting in uneven demand across some geographies and vertical markets. As we look at our broader business prospects, we are excited about our profitable growth opportunities, including our recent acquisition of Elo Touch Solutions which enables us to accelerate our vision for the connected frontline. Our strong balance sheet and free cash flow profile also enables us to commit $500 million to share repurchases over the next 12 months as we drive long-term value for our shareholders. I will now turn the call over to Nathan to review our Q3 financial results and Q4 outlook.

Thank you, Bill. Let's start with the P&L on Slide 6. In Q3, total company sales increased approximately 5%, with growth across most product categories and services and software recurring revenue business grew modestly in the quarter. Our Enterprise Visibility & Mobility segment grew 2%, led by mobile computing, and our Asset Intelligence & Tracking segment grew 11%, led by RFID and printing. As we disclosed in our earnings press release this morning, please note that effective in the fourth quarter, we are reporting under 2 new segments: Connected Frontline and Asset Visibility & Automation. Bill will cover how this view aligns to our strategy and how we manage the business. Historical results have been recast in the appendix. We realized strong sales growth across most of our regions. In North America, sales grew 6% with double-digit growth in mobile computing and RFID, offsetting weakness in Canada. Asia Pacific sales increased 23%, led by Australia, New

Thank you, Nathan. As we turn to Slide 11,

Thanks, Bill. We'll now open the call to Q&A. We'll have to 1 question and 1 follow-up to give everyone the chance to participate.

[Operator Instructions] The first question comes from Andrew Buscaglia with BNP Paribas.

So demand trends seem strong and -- are relatively strong in Q3. And I noticed your Q4 guidance implies organic growth somewhat decelerating. I know you're facing a tough comp, but I'm wondering if you can kind of walk through what you see demand-wise and just additional commentary by end market would be helpful.

Yes. I would say that if we look at Q3, the team executed well, driving sales near the high end of our outlook. And that was backed up by kind of solid demand across the business. I would say the second half is really playing out as we expected with some customers that bought products early to deliver their peak season a bit earlier than we had originally expected. I would say that if you look across the regions, we saw solid growth across North America, AsiaPac and Latin America. If we think of the vertical markets, really, the quarter was led by retail and e-commerce from an end market perspective. And as we called out in Q2, weakness in EMEA continued through Q3. I would say from a product perspective, relative strength in mobile computing and printing, and RFID a bright spot. But I would say overall, second half is playing out as we expected, just the timing of those orders coming a little early into Q3.

I see, helpful. And can you comment on EVM, the growth was rather modest in the quarter. What are you seeing specifically in that segment? And can we still expect that to grow exiting the year?

I would say EVM from a mobile computing perspective, we saw strong growth in Q3 with large deals in North America, Asia Pacific and Latin America continue to be positioned for long-term growth and opportunities across mobile computing, including device in the hands of more associates overall. Next-generation product deliverables around wearables and RFID technology. We continue, as we talked about in the prepared remarks, an opportunity mid- to longer term inside AI as we see opportunities there to leverage AI in the front line. I would say that from a data capture perspective, which is also the other element of the largest -- the second largest element of that is we saw decline based on a difficult compare, I would say, across the scanning portfolio. So I think that really was the story of EVM, a combination of strong mobile computing, but difficult compare from a scanning perspective, which then impacted overall EVM in Q3.

The next question comes from Piyush Avasthy with Citi.

With the understanding that you're not providing 2026 guidance, but it would be helpful if you could provide some puts and takes on the construct itself, like how different or similar to 2026 be from your long-term financial targets? I know that visibility is somewhat limited, and there is still some macro uncertainty but based on your conversations with your clients, how would you characterize the demand outlook heading into '26 across your different verticals?

I'd say today, while our customers remain cautious in the near term, and we're experiencing some uneven demand across different environments, I think EMEA and then overall places like Canada. So we're seeing uneven demand manufacturing from a vertical market perspective across our different vertical markets. Our solutions basically remain fundamental to our customers, and they remain essential for digitizing and automating environments. So longer term, AI represents an opportunity to continue to advance our solutions. And we're well positioned to drive sustainable profitable growth into next year is what I'd say.

Got it. And you guys mentioned digital AI features. Again, like I understand it's like very early, but how soon can these features become a catalyst for growth for the company? I think you have talked about a refresh cycle at some point. Do you think -- do you get the sense that there is demand and appetite from your customers to invest in software, which means when the next refresh cycle comes, it translates to not only hardware upgrade, but also like strong software. Any comments there?

Yes. I would say from an AI perspective, we see 2 opportunities, as you've called out. One is certainly the hardware environment with next-generation handheld devices, coupled with -- we're the leader today in wearable technology inside the enterprise. So we see that playing out as the way AI is delivered to the front line. It starts with mobile devices, and it's likely coupled with wearable technology from a hardware perspective. We're in pilot now, as we talked about in our prepared remarks, with our

The next question comes from Damian Karas with UBS.

I was wondering if you could maybe speak a little bit to the large project funnel, what you're seeing out there, what conversations you're having? Has there been any -- obviously, the fourth quarter, it doesn't appear you're expecting much large project activity. But just in terms of the funnel, is there any increase in customer conversations? And any hope that maybe you could see some of that stuff get awarded in the fourth quarter? Or are we likely going to be waiting sometime longer?

Yes, I'd say as we've talked about, I would say the demand trajectory has remained pretty consistent with our outlook from the prior quarter. And I would say customers have generally maintained their capital spending for the most part and projects continue to move forward. I would say some have -- and I think we talked about this last quarter as well, some have spread projects and purchases over multiple quarters, again, driven by caution that still remains out there as our customers are navigating the global macro uncertainty and specifically some of the ultimate ramifications to a certain trade policy that's in place today. I would say this has driven this uneven demand across some verticals and geographies. But we feel good about the business overall and continuing to extend our lead. But the demand environment hasn't changed much. I think we saw some orders earlier in the year than we anticipated. We continue to monitor our customers and not only opportunities for year-end, but what's happening across EMEA, the tariff situation, government shutdown. So there's a lot of things happening in Q4 that we feel good about our guide being balanced for the quarter and overall.

That makes sense. And Bill, on your point about some of this pull-forward demand, in the third quarter, -- any particular reason why you think some orders might have come in earlier in the second half? Anything to do with tariffs or sort of price optimization on the part of your customers? Just curious why that might be.

Yes. No, I would say, again, the timing is always -- isn't always exact, right? And we anticipated Q3, we called the guide for that. We overachieved that guide really is some customers just need a product earlier to meet their peak demand. I think that's a good thing, right? We're seeing e-commerce demand, retail continue to be strong in Q3, and I think that drove some earlier orders. I wouldn't call it pull in as much as just timing of the need for the product when they would have normally ordered a bit later. They said, Hey, I'd like to have this product earlier to meet the Q3 demand for peak. And I think that's the balance between Q3 and Q4, it's just played out in a timing perspective. I think the demand is as we expected. I mean I think we feel good about the year overall. We're going to deliver almost 6% organic revenue growth, 17% EPS growth. So the year is kind of playing out as we expected as well. So I think we feel good. It's just timing, not really pulling as much.

The next question comes from Tommy Moll with Stephens.

For the fourth quarter, I want to unpack the assumption around budget flush. So maybe we could take it in 2 parts. Can you quantify what you're assuming for Elo from a top line perspective in Q4? And then if we back that out, what does the sequential quarter-over-quarter look like there? I think typically, you see some year-end flush, but I just want to hear you talk about what you're assuming for this year.

Yes, Tommy, I'll take that. I think as Bill mentioned, we're -- I would say the first thing is holding the full year organic growth rate consistent to what we had guided back in August, and we believe that provides a balanced view of the current environment that Bill had talked about relative -- and with some of the -- some of those orders being realized a bit earlier ahead of the quarter. So if you look at our Q4 guide, 9.5% growth, as we said in the prepared remarks, about 8.5 points of that is just due to the Elo as well as Photoneo and FX. Elo, we have in the guide of $100 million, so in line with what we had talked about last quarter in terms of their overall revenue profile. And we're getting about 1 point of price, which really leaves that organic demand flat if you look at it from a year-on-year perspective. And I'd say the way to think about it is we see year-end spend just similar levels as we saw last year. If you recall, we had a nice year-end as we exited 2024, and we're seeing similar levels of spend and pipeline here as we go towards the year-end. So that's obviously one we're playing close attention to as well as, as Bill mentioned, monitoring what's going on within Europe, the government shutdown and everything else that's going around the world. But I think that's the way to think about the Q4, which is excluding FX, pricing and M&A, you really have kind of a flat demand really driven by that year-end project spend being at similar levels to last year.

Thank you, Nathan. I wanted to ask about RFID. You framed some of the recent success there. There's been a pretty high-profile announcement recently in the fresh category from one of the omnichannel leaders. I'm curious, are you able to comment if your business should benefit from that recent update? Or maybe if you're not, anything you can do to comment on forward visibility on RFID? Are there things in your pipeline that are continuing to suggest some of those elevated growth rates?

Yes. I'd say, Tommy, we clearly have seen strong double-digit growth rates on RFID over the past several years, and we continue to see a pipeline of opportunity across the entire supply chain, whether it's across retail or now T&L continues to deploy projects across RFID, manufacturing, government. I would say in retail, we're seeing grocery, as you said, fresh opportunities. So in retail beyond general merchandise, opportunities into quick-serve restaurants, into health care. So I would say the broader track and trace across supply chains, across multiple verticals, all creates growth opportunities for us. As you know, we're the -- we have the broadest set of RFID solutions in the market today across fixed and handheld readers across new releases of our mobile computing devices that have RFID integrated within them, our printing portfolio, the labels associated with that. So all of that allows us to continue to be excited about RFID and moving forward. And yes, I think things like fresh and grocery and others just create more and more demand for our solutions. I think the customers that have deployed solutions to date continue to see value and continue to expand the use cases that they've deployed already inside their environment. So RFID, I think, continues to be a growth driver for us moving forward.

The next question comes from Keith Housum with Northcoast Research.

Bill, I just want to unpack a little bit more of your commentary regarding AI and the opportunity there, understanding that it's the long game here. It sounds like the opportunity from a hardware perspective is adding more wearable devices, but also perhaps an acceleration of the refresh cycle. I guess, one, is that true? And then second, will these devices under the AI world, will they need a more higher-end device compared to what perhaps they're using today?

Yes. So I think you hit it spot on. I think the opportunity is certainly with higher premium devices, higher-end devices, which we look to drive higher ASPs. And over time, we would see that being a driver for the refresh cycle as new technology would be that. So think faster processor, more memory on mobile devices. We see that we're the global leader today in wearable technology for enterprise, and we see there's an opportunity there as well to pair, think body cam type devices with a mobile device, things that can sense the environment, see the environment. So we'll be leveraging the mobile device in certain applications, but also wearable technology could be almost watch-like technology that we've released recently as well. So different form factors and wearables as we're seeing across the customer base today. So hardware clearly, mobile computing and wearable and then software offerings. So I think if we kind of wind all the way back,

Great. I appreciate that detail. And just as a follow-up, retail and e-commerce probably run a fifth or sixth quarter at least of contributing to the growth of the company. Is there a visibility to how long that's sustainable? And you looking at historical information, is that you see over a 2-year period that these things go through a refresh cycle, then kind of another vertical is going to be expected to kind of take over and drive growth from there?

Yes, not necessarily. I would say that we've seen strength in retail and e-commerce, but we got to remember that e-commerce continues to grow, right? So that -- we talked about some of this product being used for peak, it really driven some of that by the e-commerce players as they continue to deploy devices to meet peak demand. I would say this whole idea of refresh cycle, everyone is on a different time frame and cycle, whether that's retail or T&L or postal or others. And they're all on their own cycle, meaning that every retailer is on a different cycle and every e-commerce is more -- they don't do that same type of refresh. They buy over time. But I would say T&L the same way. So I don't think it switches from one vertical to the other. I think, look, we'd like all geographies and all vertical markets to be up all at the same time. It just doesn't quite work that way. Today, we're seeing strength in retail and e-commerce. Transportation logistics has gone to more normalized levels, and we're seeing growth there. Manufacturing pretty flat, tough compare in health care. So I think that while we'd like to see everything up in the right all the time, I don't think there's a transition away from retail and e-commerce to something else. I think we'd like to see growth across all of them, and there's no reason why not. But I think things like manufacturing remains pretty challenging in the short term.

The next question comes from Jamie Cook with Truist Securities.

I guess my first question, just the margin divergence between the 2 segments, Asset Intelligence and Tracking, the margins seem to be doing better this year, whereas last year, the 2 segments were flat. So just if you could sort of unpack that as tariffs hitting one of the segments more than the other? And then I know you talked about being able to cover tariffs for the most part in 2026. Any nuances on how would it impact the segments? And I guess we can talk about it within the new segmentation, but any color on that for '26 as well?

Yes, Jamie, I wouldn't say there's anything specific driving the gross margin difference between the 2 verticals in terms of unique. I think just some of that is a bit of the mix within the portfolio. You see the strong growth in AIT. So you're getting nice volume leverage there across our printing portfolio. That's also where you have the RFID growth. kind of coming through in terms of the higher margin profile. So I think some of it just timing of mix between the portfolios. As Bill mentioned, data capture was down in Q3 in the EVM segment, which has, again, nice operating -- nice gross margin profile. So again, I think that more just mix within the portfolio quarter-to-quarter versus, let's say, a fundamental shift between the 2. Yes. And I think as we mentioned, we expect to fully mitigate tariffs as we go into next year. So you'd expect maybe a modest amount in Q1, but fully mitigated as we go into the second quarter with some additional actions the team has been working. Again, I think primarily, that will be benefiting within the AIT segment. So that's, again, where we have -- across EVM, that's where we have the mobile computing exemption today. So most of that benefit you'll see in AIT as we cycle into next year with some of the additional actions we have planned later this year and early part of next.

Okay. I guess. And then just my second question, just on Elo. So I think you said for the fourth quarter, that contributes $100 million in revenues, which is in line with the $400 million of annual sales that you talked about when you announced the acquisition last quarter. Any thoughts -- I mean, I think that's a business that you've said has grown 5% to 7% through the cycle, similar to you guys. Any thoughts on Elo as you're thinking about 2026?

Yes. I would say that we continue to be excited about the acquisition. It certainly further positions us as a strategic partner to our customers across multiple vertical markets. And the breadth and depth of their portfolio married with ours gives us more strategic partnering opportunities with our customers overall. I would say that as you said, similar growth profile to

The next question comes from Meta Marshall with Morgan Stanley.

This is Mary on for Meta. I have 2 questions for you. The first is on the pricing actions related to tariffs. So given the pricing actions that were taken to offset the tariff costs, what kind of impact are you seeing from these pricing actions on customer demand? And then my second question is on the OBBBA tax impact. Can you walk us through how the OBBBA is expected to impact your effective tax rate and cash taxes going forward?

Yes. So on the first one, maybe I'll speak to the pricing impact. So we're seeing some nice benefit from the pricing actions we announced back earlier this year. So we increased from our prior guide the expected annual benefit, which now expect to be around $60 million or 1 point of growth on an annual basis from our prior guide of $40 million. So again, some nice momentum here as we work through the third quarter in terms of overall price realization. I'd say we haven't really seen that dramatic of an impact on demand. I mean, as Bill mentioned, the year has pretty much played out as we expected, both from first half, second half. So we haven't seen a major shift or pullback in demand. And I think what we hear from our channel partners is that the pricing actions we've taken are in line with a lot of our competitors across the industry where tariffs have had an impact. So again, we feel good about the momentum there. And again, as we said, trying to fully mitigating the impact of the current tariffs as we go into next year. If you look at the impact on the new tax bill, as we said in the last guide, this year, we expect about a $50 million, $60 million reduction in our cash taxes due to the ability to amortize the current R&D deduct R&D and the full amount of that. We expect about over $200 million over the next 2 years, a little over $200 million in the next 2 years of incremental cash benefit from the change in the tax bill. But it did result -- if you noticed in our guide, we increased our expected tax rate to 18%. Part of that is just reflecting the impact of the tax bill with some of the new permanent rate effects as well as just a shift in income. So a modest impact on the overall tax rate. But again, a bigger benefit on the lower cash taxes expected over the next 2 years.

The next question comes from Joe Giordano with TD Cowen.

So when you talked last year into the fourth quarter, I felt like you had guided in a way that took the market risk largely out, right? You were guiding to things that were in hand in backlog and kind of volumes came in better than you expected and it was upside to your guide. Now this quarter, you're talking about flows similar to last year, but is that element of like we're not baking in much in terms of what we're not seeing directly in the market? Is that still a fair way to categorize like the nature of how you're guiding? And just curious what the EPS accretion you have from Elo in there is? And then I have a follow-up.

Maybe I'll start and hand to Nate. I would say that, Joe, overall, customers are generally moving ahead with planned projects. I would say they're hesitant to accelerate future projects. based on kind of macro uncertainty and the trade policy and the secondary impacts of the trade policy clearly on their business. Parcels slowing, for instance, in transportation logistics because of the trade policy, right, is an example of that. So I think while they're generally moving ahead, there's -- we haven't seen an acceleration of projects or moving in projects based on this uncertainty. But I think the discussions with our partners and customers hasn't fundamentally changed. That's why we're saying the demand trajectory feels about the same as it did when we talked last quarter and the need for our solutions certainly hasn't changed as you saw some buying early in peak to be able to meet their demands of our customers. So we're still essential A lot of it's about timing. So I think we saw above the -- close to the high end of our guide for Q3. I think we see Q4 playing out as we expected for the year. I mean, again, as I said earlier, nearly 6% organic revenue growth, 17% EPS growth for the year. But I think that overall, I think the macro environment and the trade policy uncertainty and the ramifications of their business is having customers hold back a little bit on do I advance future projects.

Joe, maybe a little additional color. I think I'd characterize the guide we had last year, which was, to your point, we assumed very little year-end spend in terms of above and beyond what we kind of had clear line of sight to. And obviously, that came in better than expected as we exited the year, where this year, we're assuming a similar level of year-end spend as we did last year. So obviously, some of that we have in hand, but the team has to go convert pipeline here over the next 6 weeks 6 to 8 weeks to close out the year. So I think characterize -- that's how I'd characterize the difference between this year's guide and last year is in terms of those expectations around year-end. And then just your question on the Elo EPS impact, it's about $0.10. So if you look at the -- for the full year, we raised the guide about $0.30. Some of that was better tariffs, basically split 1/3, 1/3, 1/3 between lower tariff Elo and a little bit of favorability on overall interest rates and share count.

And then the follow-up, and we kind of talked about this a little bit, but as you think into next year, I'm not trying to pin you down, but like as we're coming off, you had the big COVID deployments, and you had kind of a multiyear decline as we're kind of bouncing modestly off that, like what reasons, if any, would you kind of like talk us off of thinking that next year, at least from where we're sitting now, like shouldn't be at least in the range that you would see in a cycle?

Yes. I mean, again, we're not guiding to '26, as you acknowledged. I think that today, we're clearly seeing customers remain a bit caution in the near term. And because of that, we're seeing some uneven demand environments overall. EMEA example, manufacturing across different vertical segments. Some cases, it's just tough compares in case of DCS. But I'd say we feel good about driving sustainable profitable growth into next year across the business. And I think we've got to play out Q4 here, and we'll provide more guidance come first quarter.

The next question comes from Rob Mason with Baird.

Bill, I just wanted to touch on thinking about demand as you go into next year or finish up fourth quarter. A couple of your geographies, you've already talked about EMEA being softer. We saw some of that in the second quarter and it continued on here. I'm just curious maybe what the month-to-month or quarterly trend look like in that region as you entered the fourth quarter? And then also if you could address maybe conversely, just Asia Pac, that's been double digit now for, I guess, 5 quarters. Is that broadening out your customer base there? Is it kind of project specific? I'm just kind of curious what's driving the strength and how you see Asia Pac as you look forward as well.

Yes. Maybe cover all the geographies. I would say North America, strength in mobile computing and printing, tough compare in DCS, we talked about. Peak demand is -- we're already covered in retail and e-commerce in Q3, a bit of pull in there. Continued strength in RFID, as we talked about the use cases there, large and mid-tier customers and orders were up in North America. I would say, again, as we talk about trade policy, Canada, demand softer in Q3 in North America. EMEA, I would say, about the same as we saw in Q2 when we called out. It's really mixed performance in EMEA, if I added color. I would say Northern Europe continues to do well in retail and transportation logistics. where places like Germany and manufacturing or France retail continues to be challenged. But I'd say mixed throughout EMEA, but ultimately down in Q3. Asia Pacific, you called it out, strong growth in Asia Pacific. We talked about opportunities around the world and leveraging our go-to-market. And we talked about the investment in Japan. So Japan was a strength as we focused in that focus there, new applications in the postal service in Japan, where we won early device wins for postal carriers. Now we're deploying devices in post offices. So again, speak to the strength of our go-to-market organization, shifting resources into places where we have lower market share and want to drive growth. So that's a good example in Asia. Another is India. So we continue to see growth in the India market as others have called out as well, I think around the globe, stronger GDP in India. Australia and New

That's helpful. Just as a follow-up, you -- obviously, you talked about taking your -- or committed to share repurchases over the next 12 months. You did -- you have seen the stock comp tick up. Nathan, I was just curious if you could kind of address that, how that will trend? Any thoughts into '26 and kind of what's driving the increase in the stock comp?

Yes. So I think 2 things. We talked earlier in the year was somewhat of just a change in the design of the plan that had us accelerate some of the expense within the P&L. So no change in the overall comp, but just from an accounting perspective, we had to accrue a bit more of it early in the year. So as you see that play out over the next couple of years, you'll see the offset. And then this quarter, in particular, was just a true-up with coming out of our strat plan, truing up the performance and some of the performance shares and doing a kind of an accumulative catch-up. So I think this year -- this quarter was a bit of an anomaly in terms of the higher expense, and we'd expect that to normalize back out as we go into Q4 and then next year start to more normalize back to historical levels. Again, this year had some changes based on the accounting change as well as now just the true-up on the performance shares.

The next question comes from Guy Hardwick with Barclays.

Great job on the supply chain, navigating supply chain challenges. Obviously, it stands out that you intend to take China to below 20% of U.S. imports. Where do you think that goes to long term? And what do you think the kind of the footprint of contract manufacturers will look like, say, a year from now?

Yes, I can take that. I think -- look, as you mentioned, I think the team has done a phenomenal job over the last -- really, you probably say 6 years, driving that from, as we talk over 80% concentration for North America in China now down to 20% and below that as we go into next year. Look, I think there'll be a certain portion that will remain for -- it's hard to see an exit, just particularly around some of the components that are -- really, there's only one source for those, and we still use those and need to import those for service -- and those types of things. So -- we're probably getting close into the teens where you start to get a -- outside of some major shifts in component manufacturing, you kind of hit a baseline there. So -- but again, I think what we focused on is broader resilience, making sure we have multiple options, whether that's with our supply base, with our contract manufacturers so that, again, whether it's tariffs or any other natural disaster what you might have is a resilient supply chain that we can mix and move production around the world to navigate those challenges. Because that's the one thing I think we've learned over the last 5 years is that there will be something, and we need to have a resilient supply chain to manage through those. And again, I think the team has done a great job of balancing resilience with cost to get us to the footprint we have today.

And just as a follow-up, I know, Bill, you answered a couple of questions on this, but what point does technological obsolescence on the installed base in EMC actually force customers to drive to upgrade if they really want to benefit from Agentic AI, whether it's your products or

Yes. I think that if you're -- again, it creates an opportunity -- AI clearly creates an opportunity for technology-driven refresh on the mobile devices as you want to move to faster processing speeds and more memory, if you want to run the models on the device, which we're seeing many of our customers want to do. We see a combination of leveraging AI on the device and leveraging AI in the cloud depending on the specific application. But in both cases, we think this leads and attributes to the refresh cycle upcoming. The number of mobile devices continues to grow in the marketplace since pre-pandemic. And we see that our customers all upgrade on different refresh cycles, and this will be another reason to go do that. Things like health of their device, longevity, how long it's been in the marketplace, devices just get broken, they get older and others. Technology moves on. Cybersecurity is another driver. But from a technology perspective, AI is going to be one of those. I think we see the refresh cycle opportunity as being really multiyear and driven by driving sustainable growth for our growth profile as a company. And we don't see it the kind of pandemic-based compressed concentrated acceleration cycle. We see it more driving sustainable growth for us as a business, and there will be lots of factors into that and AI will be one of them.

The next question comes from Brad Hewitt with Wolfe Research.

So as it relates to the $500 million buyback that you expect to execute over the next 4 quarters, how dynamic is that number? Should we think of that as more of a minimum threshold? And then how do you think about cadence of deployment and why not execute this as an ASR?

Yes. So again, I think right now, we're just committed to the $500 million. We'll see that. I think the best way to think about that is spread out over the next 4 quarters, and we'll be dynamic taking advantage of opportunities that we see in the volatility in the stock. But again, making sure we show more of that consistent return over the next several quarters and really wanted to commit to that given we've been kind of silent on the commitment as we move into future periods, but we felt like it was the right time to make that commitment given the overall profile we have and our debt leverage ratio here as we exit the year. And I think we just think that doing it through the open market right now provides more of a benefit, lets us more manage the return and the timing of that versus uploading upfronting that through an ASR.

Okay. That's helpful. And then as we think about the Q4 outlook, it looks like the implied incremental margins are about 25%, both on a year-over-year basis and sequential basis compared to typical 30% plus incrementals. So I guess curious just is that margin outlook embedding a little bit of conservatism? Or is there anything that you would expect to limit the drop-through in Q4?

No, I think the only thing typically, in Q4, we see a little bit higher mix of large deals. So you see a little bit of mix dynamic as we go from Q3 to Q4, but nothing unusual, I'd say, from a timing or margin profile within either one of the quarters to call out.

The next question comes from Brian Drab with William Blair.

Can you talk a little bit more about the machine vision business? And I know you talked about softness in manufacturing. How has that business been doing? And then kind of the bigger picture is, are there any of these other like RFID and other growth engine type businesses that you'd call out that are in that double-digit growth range or high single-digit range that are being the growth drivers that we want them to be?

Yes. I would say that from a machine vision perspective, we saw growth in machine vision software as we've got leveraging our differentiation in our software across machine vision. I would say overall, machine vision declined in the quarter for us, really pressured in the areas in which we compete. So we've seen now stabilization in kind of semiconductor manufacturing where we're embedded in those solutions. So that's a positive news moving forward, but certainly negative in the quarter. And then some new areas that we had -- the focus of the go-to-market team has been diversification away from semiconductor manufacturing into new markets. One of those markets was a lot of spend was happening in new builds of EV auto manufacturing, but that has now slowed. So another driver of the weak quarter. I would say that our focus is really on go-to-market initiatives to expand specific markets that are growing. And leverage our advanced technology into use cases where we're leveraging this strength of our software portfolio, along with things like 3D vision to be able to win new opportunities and customers and to be able to then get a footprint in those customers and expand it from there. That's really the focus of our go-to-market teams. We're excited about this market longer term, clearly, doing more in manufacturing from our perspective is important to us, and we think that continues to be an opportunity for us. We talked about RFID already. RFID continues to be a strength for us across the vertical markets. I would say, inside other segments, I think the tablet opportunity within our mobile computing is another opportunity for us. I think the next generation of task management in software is an area we've been focused. So we're a leader in task management software. We see next-generation opportunities to that as we evolve task management into more communication collaboration with our customers to drive software growth over time, leverage with our mobile devices.

The last question comes from Katie Fleischer with KeyBanc.

I just had one question just to kind of go back to the margins for 4Q. Is there anything that we should think about for the segments that's different from this quarter? Or is it fair to assume that those margins are pretty steady?

Yes, they're pretty steady between the segments between Q3 and Q4. So I wouldn't -- we don't see any major changes around the gross margin profile between the segments quarter-to-quarter.

This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Bill Burns for any closing remarks.

Yes, I'd like to thank our employees and our partners as they delivered a strong Q3 results. And ultimately, I would like to extend a warm welcome to the Elo team as we kick off our exciting journey together moving forward. Thank you.