ZBRA - NASDAQ

Good day. And welcome to the Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2024

Good morning. And welcome to

Thank you, Mike. Good morning and thank you for joining us. Out team executed well in the fourth quarter, delivering results above our outlook. For the fourth quarter, the realized sales greater than $1.3 billion, a 32% increase compared to the prior year. Adjusted EBITDA margin of 22.1%, a nearly 7% increase. Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share of $4, which is more than double the prior year and strong free cash flow. As we discussed on our last earnings call, in the third quarter, we saw demand recovery broaden with data capture and print returning to growth, following mobile computing returning to growth in Q2. Demand trends continue to improve in most end markets throughout the fourth quarter with the manufacturing sector lagging. North America retail was a bright spot with stronger customer yearend spending than we had anticipated. These factors along with significant distributor destocking in the second half of last year resulted in strong double digit sales growth in Q4. From a profitability perspective, the operating leverage from our strong sales growth drove significant margin expansion supporting our earnings and cash flow. As we enter 2025, our order backlog supports a solid Q1. However, we remain cautious in our outlook as our customers navigate an uncertain environment, including a dynamic global trade, geopolitical, and macroeconomic backdrop. I will now turn the call over to Nathan to review our Q4 financial results and discuss our 2025 outlook.

Thank you, Bill. Let's start with the P&L on slide 6. In Q4, total company sales grew approximately 32%, reflecting continued recovery in demand across our major product categories. Mobile computing strength in retail drove growth above our outlook. Our Enterprise Visibility & Mobility segment sales increased 33%, and Asset Intelligence & Tracking segment grew 29%. Our services and software recurring revenue businesses had solid growth in the quarter. We realized double-digit sales growth across our regions. In North America, sales grew 36% with a significant improvement in large retail mobile computing works. EMEA sales grew 24% with strength in northern Europe. Asia-Pacific sales increased 30%, led by Australia, New

Thank you, Nathan. Turning to slide 10. As we look at the long-term opportunities for our business,

Thanks, Bill. We'll now open the call to Q&A. We ask that you limit yourself to one question and one follow-up to give everyone the chance to participate.

[Operator Instructions] The first question comes from Damian Karas with UBS.

Hi, good morning. This is Srikar Venjamuri on for Damien. Hey, morning. I had a couple of quick questions on what you're seeing in terms of larger project activity in 4Q, if you saw any larger projects return and how that's factoring into the 1Q guidance.

Yes, I would say that in Q4, the team delivered well at the high end of our outlook, really driven by stronger-than-expected yearend spending from our retail customers. So, yes, we did see some larger projects take place in Q4. That was the broader backdrop, I would say, was a double-digit growth across really all major categories, kind of all regions, all end markets, and order sizes of all types, meaning run rate mid-tier and large deals in the quarter. And that was certainly helped by easier compares from last year, which included distributor de-stocking. We see that that flow through of not just the retail activity, but a broader-based growth drove stronger sales growth in Q4, and then earnings above the high end of our outlook.

Yes, that makes sense. And as a follow-up, I just want to quickly touch on tariffs and just get a sense for what you're planning there, if you've already executed some pricing actions, what the timing around those pricing actions would be, and more broadly, what would be a trigger decision to move manufacturing to other regions?

Yes, so I think the question started about just our broader tariff response. Obviously, it's a dynamic environment. We have a dedicated team to establish and monitor the changes, what are the potential impact, design mitigation strategies. And if you look at our, and obviously, now we just want to provide transparency around what has been announced to date. We do expect to announce price increases shortly to respond to the announced tariffs, which is part of the mitigation strategy that's embedded in the current guide.

The next question comes from Tommy Moll with Stephens.

Good morning, and thank you for taking my questions. You mentioned that the visibility beyond the first quarter is lower than usual for this time of year. My question is, as you rolled up your full year sales outlook, what kinds of assumptions were you making on large deals there? I know in the past you look at the funnel and the pipeline and make some assumptions about conversion. What kind of assumptions are we making this year? Thank you.

Yes, I'd say, Tommy, maybe a broader view of that, and then I'll cover kind of large deals. I'd say that as we entered 2025, certainly with solid backlog, driven by the stronger retail spending, so larger orders, as you talked about, that carried into first quarter from fourth quarter. And we're expecting solid broad-based organic growth in 2025. But while we haven't seen customers really pull back spending to date, we clearly are seeing some impacts from the market uncertainty playing out with our customers. And in a couple of examples, budget's still being finalized, right. And that impacts our visibility, kind of, and tempers our expectations beyond Q1. We're seeing, specific to large orders, some customers stage deployments over longer periods of time. So that's something we are actually seeing some customers do. Clearly, we're seeing strong U.S. dollar is a headwind to us, right the FX impact. And that's causing a little bit of concern from some international customers and their plans with the strong U.S. dollar. Not as much large deal oriented, but still some impact. And I think that our customers are really focused on, hey, what's the potential impact on their business of the overall global trade policy and thinking about how do they mitigate it. And it just adds to the uncertainty of their projects and visibility small and large moving forward and our visibility around it. So while we feel good about our business and that we're confident in our business, our guide really reflects solid organic growth despite all these uncertainties. But visibility is pretty tough, both especially on large orders and deployments.

Thank you, Bill. So as you look at the inventory levels with some of your key channel partners, what context can you provide there? And if it feels like the bias is up or down or that you think the sell through and the sell in are roughly balanced at this point, any insight would be helpful. Thank you.

Yes, Tommy, this is Nathan. I'd say it's very balanced. It stayed fairly balanced throughout the year. So we're looking at days on hand in the channel. We're in a good place as we exited the year with our distribution partners around the globe. And obviously that's a daily activity with our teams, making sure they have the right inventory at the SKU level. But, again, I think we feel good about the overall inventory position here at the beginning of the year. And, again, it was pretty balanced throughout the year in terms of what we saw from a sales in, sales out perspective if you exclude the dynamics from 2023.

The next question comes from Joe Giordano with TD Cowen.

Hey, good morning, guys. Hey, yes, so on the full year, like, I guess we've touched on this a bit, but to me, like, given the 1Q, it feels a little conservative. But I understand why you're framing it the way you are given the uncertainty. I'm just curious, like, if you were to compare the full year framework and, like, what you're baking in compared to, like, where we were a year ago, how would you categorize that? It seemed like last year you were only putting in what's, like, highly visible to you. And if there was, like, project flows, it was all kind of upside. Is it a similar idea right now?

I would say that the year is playing out a little bit like last year for very different reasons, right. I think last year we came off a year that was much different in 2023 with really our customers absorbing the capacity that they built out in the pandemic. And then we saw broader-based recovery throughout 2024. I would say the lack of visibility today and the commitment to the budgets and projects is really driven by visibility. It's the idea that they're still kind of absorbing what is the global trade policy and what's happened geopolitically going to impact their business. And ultimately then it reflects back on our guide. So while we clearly see solid organic growth in the year and could it play out a bit differently where we see more confidence throughout the year. The visibility today is kind of where it's at and that's reflected in our guide. So I think that we feel like all the uncertainty out there at the moment is causing us ultimately to be conservative and impacts the guide we're providing today. That's the visibility we have today.

Yes, fair enough. Just sort of follow up. The free cash flow in the quarter was excellent. I see the guide is at least $750 million. I mean, I guess there's infinite above that. Definitionally, what are the puts and takes on ‘25 versus ‘24 that we should consider and why wouldn't it kind of build from the strength that you had here?

Yes, no, so as you mentioned great year last year from a free cash flow perspective coming off of ‘23. And at 136% cash conversion, just repeating that, committing to repeat that on an annual basis is a challenge. So if you look at the full year guide of $750 million, I mean, the real difference between the two is we do expect continued working capital improvements, but just not to the degree we saw in 2024. It also does imply that as we look at our inventory position, you saw a little bit of this in Q4 as inventory ticked up a bit to support Q, January demand, but also our teams are doing everything they can to pull volume in from a purchasing perspective and get that inventory into the U.S. as early as possible ahead of potential tariff impacts. So I think giving us some flexibility to help manage that as we go through the year and try to mitigate tariffs, use our balance sheet as much as we can to help mitigate the short-term impact from tariffs. So I'd say the big difference, again, working capital improvements, but this still implies over 90% free cash flow conversion for 2025, and we think that's just a good baseline to work from.

The next question comes from Andrew Buscaglia with BNP Paribas.

Hey, guys. Good morning. This is Ed on for Andrew. Thanks for taking my question. Following the developments with DeepSeek a few weeks ago, I wanted to ask about AI. You guys have long discussed the power of AI in the platform. Following the recent events, do you find that more efficient AI presents an opportunity from a product development standpoint or a net risk due to the probability or possibility of enhanced competition? Thanks.

Yes, we would see clearly AI as an opportunity for

Thanks for that. It was great to see that all in action at NRF. Pivoting over to M&A, you guys are entering 2025 with 1.2x leverage, fair amount of capacity to tap into. I guess if you can expand on the recent acquisition, maybe offer any other plans into capital allocation that we could think about in 2025, that'd be helpful. Thanks.

Yes, we're excited about the Photoneo acquisition and getting that closed ultimately. We feel good about that from a 3D vision perspective. So certainly, the 3D market is the fastest growing segment within machine vision. And we, again, have leveraged M&A to really continue to enter adjacent or synergistic opportunities beyond our organic investments in the business. And this is just another example of that. We were partnered with Photoneo already with an OEM partnership. So we know the business well and the leadership team. So we feel good about that. We've certainly, as you said, have a strong balance sheet and that enables us to have flexibility. I think we'll use M&A to advance our vision and strategy. That's what we've done in closely adjacent markets. And I'd say today, the near term, given the macro uncertainty and the visibility, we're kind of experienced in the market. There's a bit of a higher bar and certainly with higher interest rates, but we continue to be inquisitive about M&A and continue to use it as a tool to advance our vision.

The next question comes from Piyush Avasthy with Citi.

Hey, good morning, guys. Thanks for taking my questions. From a regional perspective, can you elaborate on the trends you are seeing in Europe and China based on your conversations with your customers? Like what's your outlook, overall outlook for these regions as we think of your 1Q guidance and ‘25 in general? Like we have heard some mixed signals from other companies, so we'd appreciate what you're seeing at your end.

The two geographies, Europe and China, is that what you said?

Yes.

Yes, I'd say that, okay, great. I maybe started North America, strong growth across all the product categories and end markets in North America, return to yearend spend within retail, strong growth in healthcare, manufacturing lagging, I guess, in North America. EMEA, I'd say the highest growth rates really came from Northern Europe. Overall, we saw momentum in larger projects continue to build throughout 2024. We're continuing to see competitive wins and strength in retail in our mobile computing business in Europe. And manufacturing still remains challenging, particularly in Germany and Europe. I'd say China represents about 3% of our business overall, and we've seen modest sales growth in China as the business has stabilized. But I think in Asia, the real strength has come from more like Australia, New

Yes, helpful. Quickly following up on what you just said, like manufacturing lagging versus your other verticals, like the current US administration appears to be more pro-US. So based on your conversations with your customers, I know it's still early, but have you at least begun to see a step up in conversations where your customers are talking about reshaping their supply chain and maybe adopting more automation, robotics and machine vision?

Yes, I mean, we're seeing clearly that around the world, manufacturing represents an opportunity for us. We see it as a short-term lagging the other markets, right. But we see longer term it's an opportunity as we're less penetrated in manufacturing than our other vertical markets. And we see the investment in automation around machine vision, the move from fixed screens to tablets with production, workers are monitoring production. RFID opportunities throughout the entire supply chain, all are opportunities for us.

The next question comes from Brian Drab with William Blair.

Good morning, just a couple of quick questions. So on the difference between AIT and EVM in the 2025 outlook. In 2024, AIT was essentially if I'm rounding a little bit, but flat. First quarter, second quarter, third quarter, kind of around $400 million, and then you have the seasonal strength in the fourth quarter. EVM, of course, kind of improving sequentially building. Is that similar dynamic to what you expect in 2025?

Yes, I'd say I would expect similar growth rates if we look out for the balance of the year. Obviously, there's timing-wise in terms of growth rates could look a little distorted just based on obviously Q1 last year, we were down 16%. So, from an easier comp, obviously, that's playing into the higher growth rate in the first quarter across the portfolio. But I think on the balance of the year, again, as we talk about the visibility, we'd expect fairly consistent growth across the two segments. And we see that really across even back to the previous question, we're not seeing a huge bifurcation, whether it's geography or vertical market, or if we'll get run rate large deals, we're seeing kind of, again, consistent growth across each one of those dimensions here as we enter the year. Now, again, on a quarterly basis, you might see some variation just based on comps or timing of some deals, but I think on the year, you'll see fairly balanced growth.

Okay, thanks, Bill. And then just one other question, could you elaborate on how you're thinking about moving production potentially? I think last time with the China tariffs and trade war; the playbook was a little bit more simple where you move production out of China. But are you at this point considering even potentially moving some production back to the United States, I guess, which is one of the intentions of the administration?

Yes, I'd say, look, we continuously assess the manufacturing footprint and take in multiple factors from geopolitical stability to capability within the regions, which I think is a really important dynamic, as well as cost, overall cost from a full production capability. And we have made significant progress to diversify our supply base, which gives us a lot more flexibility today to respond than we did several years ago. I mean, if you look back historically, 85% of our imports into North America were from China. And with the actions we have in place right now, and that are executing, we'll end the year with about a third of our exposure from China. So again, a lot of great work over the past several years to diversify. And then if you look today outside of China, it's primarily through Southeast Asia, and kind of high single digit exposure to Mexico. So like, I think we'll continue to evolve based on where things land from a trade perspective to have a diverse supply chain that gives us the most competitive position we can. So again, a lot of great activity, I think to put us in a place, I think one advantage we have is our partnership with global manufacturing partners that have footprints around the world really gives us that flexibility to leverage their footprint and where they're expanding as they react with their other customers, gives us a lot of scale and capability that we wouldn't have on our own. And we're taking full advantage of that.

The next question comes from Meta Marshall with Morgan Stanley.

Great, thanks. Just given that we're kind of hitting four or five years since COVID and kind of some of the demand surges that you saw, I know in the past you've talked about kind of consider a large deal activity more indicative of refresh activity. But just is that still the same way to think about it and just kind of what you're seeing on that refresh pipeline, maybe build. And then I don't think that I caught anything in terms of kind of RFID performance during the quarter and just kind of where that was versus kind of overall growth trends. Thanks.

Yes, great. I'll take both of those. I would say that from a refresh perspective, we continually have refresh activity. And I think that you look at, for instance, the fourth quarter retail spend was refresh plus additional opportunities in those retailers. Because remember refresh comes with multiple years of continuing to add additional devices, add applications. And then when a refresh time comes, they typically even more broad applications. I would say given the install base of mobile computers and the expansion of that since pre-COVID, they certainly believe that creates an opportunity for us. We're not seeing any acceleration of refreshes like into 2025 or anything like that. But we think the timeframes, every customer is on a different timeframe, meaning how long they use their devices, depending on how hard they are on the devices, how many applications they use, do they need more processing power, or are they just damaging the devices because it's a hard environment. I'd say there's clearly an opportunity over the coming years here to refresh the devices we sold as you came out of COVID into ‘21 and ‘22. And that opportunity is still ahead of us and absolutely there. I'd say from an RFID perspective, we're pretty happy with RFID. We had a strong Q4 sales growth in RFID. We've got a pipeline of opportunities across supply chain, not just in retail, but T&L, manufacturing, even government. We've seen some opportunities most recently. Our adoptions beyond retail really have retail general merchandise, right, which has always been the primary use case into things like fresh food, right. We saw the first North America grocer really move ahead with a rollout associated with bakery and fresh foods. We've seen another large retailer in North America look at apparel as well as fresh foods. So, we've seen the U.S. military move ahead with one of their branches with visibility across the supply chain. So, we're continuing to see broader adoption of RFID. We've got probably the broadest portfolio of RFID of anybody from fixed handle readers to printers to services to specialty labels. So, I think we feel good about the opportunity and the broadening of that across supply chain into grocery, into government applications, and we feel pretty good.

The next question comes from Keith Housum with Northcoast Research.

Good morning, guys. We appreciate it. In terms of, and I hate to keep on being the drum here with the full year guide, but just trying to understand that a little bit better about perhaps how that changed just over the past several weeks in terms of has the lack of visibility increased because it seems like visibility was increasing over the past several quarters? And in a second, can you perhaps touch about the visibility based on the end market here? Just trying to understand the dynamics there.

Keith, I think part of it is visibility, but I think that is somewhat of an outcome of the uncertainty that we've, I think everyone's experienced here over the last couple months. So, if you look at our full year guide of 3% to 7%, and so over 6% on an organic basis. Obviously, the FX has become a significant headwind to sales growth since our last business update in terms of the strength of the U.S. dollar, and it's been fairly volatile even over the last coming week. So, that FX headwind increases through the year as we roll over the hedges we've had in place, particularly here the first half of the year. And as Bill mentioned while demand has stabilized again, there's the -- we have the wider range reflects that higher uncertainty. So, again, it's not, we're not predicting a fall-off from a trade war nor an acceleration, as Bill mentioned, from the refresh cycle. But we think outside of Q1, steady mid-single digit organic growth for the balance of the year is appropriate, again, given the visibility and the uncertainty around the macroeconomy today.

Got it. Appreciate it. And then, just trying to understand, like, the trends in the overall industry, and we're seeing more and more of your devices, I guess, we reach more toward the consumer end of the market. Can you talk about how, like, your average sales price has evolved over the past several years, and where should we think about where it's going in the future?

Yes, I would say that Keith, I'd say that there hasn't been a lot of change in ASP over the time frame. There's, I would say that we've tiered the portfolio across mobile computing, scanning, printing, to really protect the ASPs at the high end. So, if you want to buy a value-tier device at the lower end of the market, I have that for you. Because in the past, I would, if I didn't have that device, I'd have to bring my mid-tier pricing to go compete at the low end of the market. So, tiering of the portfolio of kind of premium, mid, and value-tier has really helped us kind of protect ASPs. I think that we continue to look at opportunities for mobile computing that drive the device in the hands of more associates. That clearly is a theme we've talked about for the last several years, and, but we are seeing it more. We're seeing it in mobile computing, and we're seeing it in tablet. I mentioned it kind of before, and let's use manufacturing as an example. The move from fixed screens to control production to tablets is a real opportunity, right. The idea that AI and ultimately the idea of having an assistant, a digital assistant, the idea of communication and collaboration, the idea of task management, more and more enterprises are realizing without having connectivity to the frontline worker, it's very difficult to communicate to them. Think of even a big box retailer. The only way for a manager to meet with everybody is to get them all in the break room and have a conversation. If you have no communication collaboration vehicle throughout the store. So, I think that we'll see in mobile computing, ASPs are what they are. Tiering the portfolio helps, but I think there's an opportunity here to put the device in the hands of more associates. We've got new devices out to go do that. So, some of our new devices are instead of scan engine-based or camera-based, but they have RFID technology on them. That's another opportunity for us. So, I think we feel good about the price points we're selling mobile computing, but we're more excited about generating more demand with devices in the hands of more workers.

The next question comes from Guy Hardwick with Freedom Capital Markets.

Hi, Good morning. Bill, I just want to follow up on that last point. Those of us who were at the NRF show in January saw the

Yes, I mean, I think it's still early in the launch to kind of predict where all the revenues come from. We've thought a lot about multiple areas to generate additional either volume of business or us to win more or others. So, I'll give you a couple of examples maybe there, and then we can go further. But I think clearly monetizing the premium device hardware, right, working closely with Qualcomm and Google and to make sure that we've got devices that'll support AI for our customers, not only in the cloud but on the device itself, which could drive ultimately premium hardware revenue and margin. Market share gains. We continue to lead in the innovation front, and we believe we'll do that here with AI as well, with our AI suite as well as our own companions, but also working with our partners. So, anytime I can drive additional value to my end customer, either with our own software or third party software and make it easy for our customers to either write the software or third party vendors or

Great. Thanks. Just as a quick follow-up, I'm just wondering whether you saw any pre-buy activity in Q4 or early Q1 in getting ahead of tariffs by customers?

Yes, no, not really. I mean, we've seen some customers we've seen larger retail orders with yearend spending, but not really driven by tariffs. So, I would say really no.

The next question comes from Brad Hewitt with Wolf Research.

Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. So, it appears that you're embedding about 30% organic incremental margins in 2025. I know the long-term framework is 30% incrementals or better, but I would have thought the incrementals could have been a bit stronger in the early stages of volume recovery. So, can you just walk through the puts and takes for 2025 on the margin side of things?

Yes, Brad, I think probably the first one I would point to is with the guide including $20 million of profit headwind from the incremental tariffs. And again, that's predominantly in the first half of the year. So, peaking in Q2, then we'd see a pretty substantial sequential improvement from Q2 to Q3, and then fully mitigated in Q4. So obviously that's if you remove that, you'd have probably a different, you come to a different conclusion around the sequential improvement in margin. So, I think that's one to consider. And again, where we've been focused at least on what's been announced to date, ensuring we mitigate those as soon as possible so that we can, again, exit the year, end the year, and exit the year kind of fully recouped and get those back as we head into 2026. So, I think that's probably the first and most important dynamic from on the margin standpoint. And then if you look from the full year EBITDA guide of ‘21 to ‘22, and obviously the higher end of the range would reflect removing those tariffs and get back to kind of where we'd expect full profitability to be on a standalone basis or a pre-tariff, or at least pre-incremental tariff basis. And that's where you really see the volume leverage, along with about 0.5 point of FX headwind as we mentioned earlier. So, I think those are some of the puts and takes.

Okay. That's helpful. And then it looks like your gross margin on the service and software side of the business stepped down sequentially, and has been in a bit of a downtrend since the start of 2024. So, can you just talk about what's going on there and how you think about the services and software gross margin going into 2025?

Yes. So, Q4 was down a bit. Some of that was just timing. We had pretty high demand from a repair volume. Part of that was internally driven just as we recouped some of the supply chain on some of those component parts and be able to get the repairs complete into Q4. And I'd still expect both that service and software line to be accretive and drive margin expansion. And as we've said before, just not to the same degree we've seen over the last five years. I mean, the team has done an incredible job on both of the portfolio service and software, expanding margins over the last three to four years to get us to where we are today. And I'd still expect margin expansion, but just not to the same degree we've seen over the last four years.

The next question comes from Melissa Shreve with Barclays.

Hi. Good morning. Just a quick question. You guys noticed that there was strength in healthcare in Q4. Just thinking about moving into 2025. I know healthcare is the smallest vertical, but it was pretty strong all last year. How should we kind of think about that moving into 2025? Is this a vertical where we should see continued kind of outside strength? Thank you.

Yes. I would say that in Q4, we saw broad-based demand across all the vertical markets. But as we commented, we feel good about where we're at in healthcare. We've got a portfolio product specific to healthcare. Prior to the pandemic, healthcare was our fastest growing vertical for some time. And it's reemerged to that in Q2, Q3, and Q4 in 2024. And we would see that continuing into 2025. I would say the improved productivity that healthcare workers get and providers get from the use of devices. I would say that the opportunities exist in clinical mobility. It's in-home healthcare, patient engagement, virtual care. So, I think all of that bodes well for our portfolio of solutions. We have the HIMSS show coming up, which is the largest trade show in healthcare that we're excited about. We talked about the retail show, but we're at that show in the next coming weeks, and we'll spend more time with our customers there. But I think the healthcare team, our sales team's done a great job. And I think that we've got a great portfolio of products and solutions in healthcare. So, I'd see continued strength there, yes.

The next question comes from Jim Radushi with Needham & Company.

Hi. Good morning. This is Chris Grenga on for Jim. Just a couple quick ones. Do you anticipate the feature set for Companion being exclusive to the customer that was showcased in our effort for any period of time? And could you talk about potentially the opportunity for these types of features to be expanded beyond, like, a retail setting into the manufacturing and perhaps transportation logistics verticals? Thank you.

Yes. So, I think that, no, it's not exclusive to any one customer. It's a solution, and it's in two ways. One is that our AI suite for mobile computing allows our independent software vendors and our partners to be able to leverage AI on our devices for their own applications. So, that way, they can broaden it, whether it's our customers specifically, and in the case of the customer that presented with us at NRF, or it's independent software vendors building on top of the devices, and then we're going to build agents on our own as well from that perspective. So, both. Nothing there. What was the second part of the question? [Multiple Speakers]

Sorry.

I can jump on the AI companion being used in other verticals. One good example is we're using it within our own distribution center from a knowledge management. Think of, again, language transfer, being able to translate documents and standard operating procedures into different languages to support the workforce to, again, same thing that they're trying to do in retail, which is how do you quickly train new frontline workers to get up to speed as quickly as possible, and we're using that functionality in our own distribution center. So, yes, I'd say different parts of the functionality are absolutely applicable to other vertical markets.

Yes, the idea is what you train the model on, right. So, ultimately, it would be standard operating procedures within, as Nate said, a warehouse or picking environment. It could be standard operating procedures inside manufacturing. So, those are all opportunities to leverage the base software, and it's all about training the model for your specific application. So, yes.

Our last question comes from Rob Jamieson with Cowen & Company.

Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my questions. Just the first one, I know you've given a lot of color and appreciated around the full year guidance, but just wanted to make sure I had this right. So, basically, I haven't seen really any indication of delays or pushouts, just more of kind of hesitance from your customers, and maybe just taking it a little bit longer to understand the ramifications of tariffs and everything. I guess in a normal year, when would you expect to get a little bit more visibility? And then, if some of this policy does come through and we get some clarity from the Trump administration, would you expect to see a little bit more of an understanding of how the rest of the year might play out, and when might that happen? Like, would that be later this quarter and the second quarter?

Yes. I would say that there's always customers budgets and visibility. I would say, typically, by this time, we'd have more conviction by our customers of the projects they're going to move ahead with. And I think it's just this visibility and uncertainty out there across the environment. There's no specific date. Customers are all different. The retail customers now are still wrapping up their year, right, as we're continuing to ship in Q1 here to finalize last year's budgets from their perspective. Other T&L customers have budgets yearend, or sorry, mid-year so it differs by customer. I think that the lack of visibility is really driven by this uncertainty, right. And as you said, if there becomes more clarity around trade and what's going to happen from a policy perspective, but even yesterday and today, there were discussions of reciprocal tariffs in other countries. So this uncertainty is not helping because our customers are focused, as we are, on things like, hey, what happens if, and how do I go mitigate tariffs and others as opposed to finalizing projects specifically with us. So you're right. We haven't seen anything be moved out or customers delaying things yet. We just don't have the visibility we'd normally have at this point in time. FX certainly is a headwind on the growth that's real today. The China tariffs are real today. But could the Mexico tariffs go away? That's why we try to characterize it about 50% of what Nate talked about is Mexico, 50% is China, if it does go away. So more clarity certainly would help and give our customers more confidence in their year, and then give us more clarity. So the problem is, even as of yesterday and today, there's less clarity than more on tariffs.

No, and thank you for that. And then just one last one, just on the Photoneo acquisition, I know you said it's not included in your full year guidance. Is there anything you can give us in the way of potential expectations from revenue profitability for a full year as that acquisition gets completed?

Yes, and obviously, based on the purchase price, it's relatively small in that relative to the total portfolio. But assuming closing later this quarter, it'd be around 30 bps of incremental revenue for the year. So again, we'd include that in our guide as we move into second quarter once the deal is closed.

This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Mr. Burns for any closing remarks.

Yes, I'd like to thank our employees and partners for their support as we continue to work together to solve our customers' biggest challenges. Our relentless focus on innovation will continue to transform our customer workflows. We feel good about our business. Have a great day, everyone.