Thanks, Mark, and good morning, everyone. Again, for the quarter, we had GAAP net income of $2.5 million with EPS of $0.35 per share. When we exclude the servicing recapture on the noncore expense items, core diluted EPS was $0.36, up 20% compared to the similar core earnings in the first quarter of '22. Total operating revenue was down for both the linked quarter and the prior year quarter. However, when we exclude the servicing rights we capture from both years, operating revenue would be up 12.1%. Also, the continued lower level of mortgage gain on sale, which was down nearly $1.1 million had a significant impact on our ability to grow total operating revenue. Margin revenue was up 22% from the prior year, and the efficiency of our balance sheet improved this quarter as our loan-to-deposit ratio rose to nearly 90% and total loans to assets rising to 73%. Now as we break down further the first quarter income statement, beginning with margins. For the quarter, our net interest margin came in at 3.37%, which is up 69 basis points for the prior year. Due to the shift in our earning asset mix and a net deposit beta of earning assets versus funding. Compared to the linked quarter, the impact of much higher funding costs, as Mark discussed, could not be overcome by our loan growth and the improvement in earning asset yields. Cash and securities as a percentage of total assets continued the reduction in the quarter as they are now just 19.5% of total assets. This compares to 20% and 30% for the linked and prior year quarter. Pre pandemic, we averaged just over 12% of assets in these lower yielding instruments. This shift in mix has benefited our interest income and is reflected in our earning asset yield improvement. For the quarter, we had loan yield of 5.04%, up 21 basis points of linked quarter, and our overall earning asset yield improved 22 basis points from the linked quarter. So based on these two key measures were both 25 for the quarter, and interest income as a result of the improvement in these metrics was $13.8 million, up 7% for the linked quarter and 47% from the prior year quarter. For the first time since the Fed began to raise interest rates, our funding base were higher than our earning asset and loan betas. For the quarter, our deposit beta was $48 million and our overall cost of funds beta was 55%, but approximately two times the earning asset loan betas referenced earlier. We were able to raise deposits, primarily in the 1-year window of roughly 50 basis points below the marginal wholesale funding rate. Deposit costs, as you can expect, rose substantially in the quarter, up to 94 basis points from 53 in the linked quarter and up from 22 in the first quarter of 2022. Nonretail funds, which are approximately 17% of total assets provide a diverse mix of funding for our operations, predominantly using the Sears [ph] and ICS product with some term and overnight FHLB borrowing, this pool of funds as a weighted average rate of 2.65%. Fee income as a percentage of average assets was flat to the linked quarter at 1.1%, driven by lower mortgage gain on sale in the absence of any SBA loan sales. As Mark indicated, we expect a strong second quarter in SBA fees as we have several large credits that we are in the process of pricing in secondary market. Any kind of prior year comparison on fee income would not be meaningful given the large servicing rights we capture in the prior year and the strong mortgage activity we experienced in early 2022, prior to interest rate increases that began in March of last year. Mortgage gain on sale yield came in at the mid-2s for the quarter, which are not harbinger of the future state as the volume of loan sales in the quarter was quite small. At these current levels of Freddie pricing, we would expect the prudent use of our hedge will allow us to realize yield levels between 2.25% and 2.5% moving forward. At that level, our breakeven origination volume, assuming a 70% sale factors, roughly $350 million of annual originations. At this point, we are below that level when factoring in our current pipeline and the latest mortgage forecast. The upcoming quarter will be very important to us in settling the future direction as regards to the business line. The market value of our mortgage servicing rights continue to move higher with the decline in refinance volume and ended the quarter with a calculated fair value of 126 basis points. This fair value was up 9 basis points from the linked quarter and up 21 basis points for the prior year. Our servicing rights balance remained level in the linked quarter at $13.5 million and remaining temporary impairment was down to just $121,000 with a recapture of $56,000 in the quarter. It is likely we will capture the remaining impairment sometime this year. Our expenses in Q1 amounted to $10.8 million, which was expected to be higher than the linked quarter on a run rate basis. While we had some nonrecurring expenses of around $120,000, we anticipate that the expense review mentioned by Mark earlier, will result in lower annual expenses in 2023 compared to 2022. Our focus on technology spend, which was a significant factor in closing the digital gap and advancing our company further along the technology path is largely [complete] (ph). Now as we turn to the balance sheet. Wholesale funding levels declined in the quarter by nearly 14% as we were able to not only fund higher loan growth, but also reduce borrowings with our deposit gathering activity. These deposits have come at the higher end of the scale, and we did see a larger-than-normal movement of deposit funding in term certificates in the quarter. Time deposits now comprise over 21% of our deposit book, up from approximately 13% in the prior year, as clients sought to move liquid funds into predominantly the 1-year term window. Most of our new growth also came in at 1 year bucket. One of our strategies was to price a bit aggressive at the margin, but that came with a stipulation that new funds from competitors were required. We were pleased with our results as total deposits at quarter end were up $23 million over 2022 the year-end. Paydowns in the investment portfolio continue as scheduled with the portfolio on pace to decline by roughly $25 million this year through normal amortization. Should rate declines accelerate cash flow from a predominantly mortgage-backed portfolio will provide the liquidity for our anticipated loan growth. The AOCI negative mark improved in the quarter as anticipated. Tangible common equity, including the AOC impairment, improved in the quarter to 7.29% with a tangible book value per share up to 13.93. Total equity net of AOCI of $149.4 million was up from the prior year, represented 11.1% of total assets. Regulatory capital continues to be strong with common equity Tier 1 and total risk-based capital estimated to be 13.5% and 14.8%, respectively, at the end of the quarter. We did buy back a small number of our shares in the quarter at an average price of $14.54 and below current adjusted TCE per share of 18.23. As Mark mentioned, our loan reserve improved significantly in the quarter, ending at 1.58% of total loans. During the quarter, we adopted CECL, which added $1.4 million to our reserve an additional $1.3 million to our unfunded commitment liability. Even with the limited charge-offs in the quarter of just 3 basis points, we decided to add to our already peer-leading reserve with a net provision of $250,000. In addition, we had positive momentum in our classified loans as for the quarter, our criticized and classified loans now stand at just $9.4 million and are down 25% versus the linked quarter and 53% from the prior year quarter. I will now turn the call back over to Mark.