PCH - NASDAQ

Good morning. My name is Lisa and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the PotlatchDeltic's Third Quarter 2022 Conference Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers' remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Thank you. I would now like to turn the call over to Mr. Jerry Richards, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for opening remarks. Sir, you may proceed.

Thank you, Lisa. Good morning and welcome to PotlatchDeltic's third quarter 2022 earnings conference call. Joining me on the call is Eric Cremers, PotlatchDeltic's President and Chief Executive Officer. This call will contain forward-looking statements. Please review the warning statements in our press release, on the presentation slides, and in our filings with the SEC regarding the risks associated with these forward-looking statements. Also please note that a reconciliation of non-GAAP measures can be found on our website at www.potlatchdeltic.com. I'll turn the call over to Eric for some comments and then I will review our third quarter results and our outlook.

Thank you, Jerry. We reported third quarter total adjusted EBITDA of $101 million after the market closed yesterday. That makes eight out of the last nine quarters that our quarterly EBITDA has exceeded $100 million. We are having another really strong year with EBITDA of $522 million through the first three quarters. Our financial results reflect the strength of our leverage to lumber strategy. Our Wood Products segment's adjusted EBITDA was $31 million in the third quarter. Lumber prices were lower than last quarter as expected, but they are still at attractive levels. The composite price has stabilized over the last couple of weeks and has increased modestly to $494 per thousand board feet after declining 12 weeks in a row. Lumber futures are also back above $500 per thousand board feet. We continue to expect that lumber prices will remain above long-term averages. We shipped 265 million board feet of lumber in the third quarter which was 11 million feet more than we shipped in Q2. Transportation was a significant risk when we entered the third quarter, but availability of railcars and trucks has improved considerably. We successfully completed the rebuild of our Ola, Arkansas sawmill and restarted the large log line on schedule in the third quarter. The start-up phase is underway and the mill is expected to reach its 150 million board feet annual capacity on a run rate basis by the end of 2022 as planned. As a reminder Ola's rebuild also significantly lowers the mill's cash processing costs and improves its log recovery. Our Timberlands segment generated adjusted EBITDA of $65 million in the third quarter. Our Southern Timberlands team continued to take advantage of favorable logging conditions and strong log demand, resulting in harvest volumes that exceeded our expectations. Notably, our team set a quarterly harvest record for our Southern Timberlands business. The addition of CatchMark's Timberlands will provide another boost in the fourth quarter. Idaho harvest volumes were seasonally higher this quarter, but fell short of our plan primarily due to contractor availability issues. Our Idaho team is working hard to address the issues and they have a plan in place to reduce the harvest shortfall in the fourth quarter. Our Real Estate segment had another solid quarter with adjusted EBITDA of $14 million. On the rural side of the business, we sold 1,600 acres at nearly $4000 an acre. The development side of our real estate business remains strong. Residential lot inventory in our Chenal Valley master-planned community remains at low levels and we continue to have good take-up on our lot offerings. We also completed over $6 million of commercial land sales in the quarter which averaged $183,000 per acre. That is three quarters in a row that we have closed commercial sales in Chenal, resulting in total revenue $11 million thus far this year. Turning to housing, we continue to believe that the backdrop is favorable over the long-term. There is a fundamental shortage of housing stock due largely to the combination of under-building after the great financial crisis and favorable demographics in the form of millennials, who are the largest demographic cohort in U.S. history. While the rapid increase in mortgage rates has played a key role in slowing housing demand, the Fed's aggressive pace could turn into an easing cycle beginning as soon as mid-2023. Lower demand should also result in home prices declining. Acknowledging that it will take time, we expect demand to increase in U.S. housing starts to return to levels above the long-term average of 1.5 million units per year, once homes become more affordable. In the meantime, a number of housing units under construction in the U.S. remains elevated at 1.7 million units in September. The elevated level of housing units under construction supports lumber demand in the near-term. In addition home buyers and builders have ways to respond to affordability issues. For example, remote work opened the possibility to move to less costly parts of the country for a lot of people, builder concessions or a shift in product mix to smaller homes or fewer amenities are other examples. Shifting to repair and remodel, the largest market segment for lumber demand the underlying fundamentals continue to be favorable for a variety of reasons. Existing U.S. housing stock remains the oldest in the history of the statistic at 42 years on average. This is important, because older homes are significantly smaller than new homes on average and the older homes typically need more repairs. Higher mortgage rates mean that people are much more likely to stay in their existing homes. Remodeling is a very attractive option for homeowners, given record levels of home equity across the U.S., a strong job market and the fact that consumer balance sheets remain in great shape. In addition, higher interest rates usually have less of an effect on repair and remodel demand than other factors. [indiscernible] expect repair and remodel spending to continue to grow. The National Association of Homebuilders is forecasting a 7% increase in R&R spending in 2022 a 6% increase in 2023 and a 4% increase in 2024. Harvard's The Leading Indicator of Remodeling Activity report forecast R&R spending will be 6.5% higher year-over-year in Q4 of next year. Both forecasts imply healthy lumber volume growth in the R&R segment given much lower but still attractive lumber prices. Our home center customer takeaway remains strong and we remain optimistic about lumber demand in the repair and remodel market segment. Turning to CatchMark, the merger closed on the 14th of September. We continue to be excited about the strategic and financial benefits provided by the transaction. While we only operated the Timberlands for two weeks in the quarter, we were very pleased with log price realizations and harvest volumes. Integration of the two companies is going faster than anticipated, as we have already achieved CAD synergies of $15 million. Also, we now expect to achieve CAD synergies of $21 million versus the $16 million target that we communicated, when we announced the transaction at the end of May due to higher interest savings than planned. The sharp rise in interest rates led to a significant increase in the value of our interest rate swaps which allowed us to reduce the combined company's interest run rate by $8.5 million annually. Jerry will provide more color on the interest savings. As discussed on last quarter's earnings call, we were the successful bidder on three bolt-on timberland transactions earlier this year, aggregating $101 million in total. In total these transactions add approximately 46,000 acres to our ownership in Mississippi and Arkansas and the last of the three transactions closed earlier this month. Given our strong results in the first half of the year, we expect to pay another special dividend this year. While the amount depends on our performance for the remainder of the year we expect the amount will be much lower than the $4 special dividend we paid last year. We will review the special dividend with our Board in December. On the theme of returning cash to shareholders, our Board approved a new $200 million share repurchase program in August. We believe repurchasing stock at the current price level is very attractive, and we look forward to our trading window opening in early November, one week from today. Finally, we remain committed to growing our regular dividend sustainably increasing our stable cash flows with the CatchMark merger and the bolt-on timberland transactions provides the opportunity to continue doing so. Now, that said, the relative attractiveness of deploying capital to repurchase shares given the current steep discount to our estimated NAV will factor into our analysis. We typically review the regular dividend with our Board in the fourth quarter. At the end of Q3, we have $484 million of cash on the balance sheet and liquidity of nearly $800 million. Our leverage remains low and our financial strength provides a solid platform for continued growth. Regarding environmental, social, and governance reporting, we published our third annual ESG report in May and our first carbon and climate report in September. Our team is currently working on developing a full ESG section of our website. PotlatchDeltic has a strong ESG story and we are committed to do our part to mitigate climate change and continue our legacy of responsibility across the ESG spectrum. To wrap-up my comments, PotlatchDeltic remains very well positioned and our strong balance sheet and liquidity provide a high degree of flexibility as we seek to maximize shareholder value. While there is no doubt that new residential construction is weakening given affordability issues, our view is that R&R spending will remain relatively strong over the next couple of years. In addition, the housing construction downturn may prove to be relatively short-lived. I will now turn it over to Jerry to discuss our third quarter results and our outlook.

Thank you, Eric. Starting with page five of the slides. Adjusted EBITDDA was $101 million in the third quarter. The quarter-over-quarter decline in EBITDDA was primarily due to lower lumber prices. I'll now review each of our operating segments and provide more color on our third quarter results. Information for our Timberlands segment is displayed on slides six through eight. The segment's adjusted EBITDDA increased from $58 million in the second quarter to $65 million in the third quarter. Our sawlog harvest in the North increased from 276,000 tons in the second quarter to 459,000 tons in the third quarter. Our second quarter harvest was constrained by spring breakup and unseasonably wet weather in June. Our quarterly harvest volume is typically the highest in the third quarter as dry weather results in more favorable logging conditions. Having said that, our harvest fell short of plan in the third quarter, primarily due to log and haul contractor availability issues. Our Northern team is working through those issues and they have a plan to make up as much of the harvest shortfall as possible in the fourth quarter. Northern sawlog prices were 25% lower on a per ton basis in the third quarter compared to the second quarter. The decline in sawlog prices primarily reflects lower prices for indexed sawlogs. Our index prices reset on a one-month lag which means the second quarter index prices reflect much higher lumber prices in April and May. In the South, we harvested 1.4 million tons in the third quarter compared to one million tons in the second quarter. Relatively dry conditions and solid execution by our Southern Timberlands team allowed us to continue to take advantage of strong sawlog demand. While it's not apparent from the rounded results on slide eight, our southern sawlog prices were 1% higher in the third quarter compared to the second quarter. The increase was driven by two weeks of volume in CatchMark's stronger Southern markets and a seasonally higher mix of hardwood sawlogs. As discussed on last quarter's earnings call, we expected Southern Yellow Pine sawlog prices to decline modestly in our legacy operations in the third quarter due to increased log availability. The decline proved to be milder than we anticipated and pine sawlog prices in our legacy wood baskets remain higher on a year-over-year basis. Moving to Wood Products on slides nine and 10. Adjusted EBITDDA declined from $107 million in the second quarter to $31 million in the third quarter. Our average lumber price realization decreased 34% from $865 per thousand board feet in the second quarter to $572 per thousand board feet in the third quarter. By comparison, the random links framing lumber composite price was 28% lower in the third quarter than the second quarter. As a reminder the lag we experienced between booking and shipping orders is not captured by the composite which is closer to a real-time indication of price. Our lumber prices were flat for much of the third quarter before declining about 10% in September. Our average lumber price realizations per thousand board feet were $590 in July, $593 in August and $534 in September. Lumber shipments increased 11 million board feet from 254 million board feet in the second quarter, to 265 million board feet in the third quarter. Our team worked hard to mitigate transportation issues to achieve that result. Shifting to real estate on Slides 11 and 12. The segment's adjusted EBITDDA was $14 million in the third quarter compared to $22 million in the second quarter. EBITDDA generated by rural sales declined sequentially, due to the mix and timing of transactions. For example, second quarter results included a 10,700 acre Minnesota conservation transaction, at just over $800 per acre while the third quarter consisted of the sale of only 1,600 acres in total. As a reminder, the Minnesota sale I referenced is the last meaningful sale in that state as it culminated a long-term strategy that created approximately $300 million of value for shareholders. Business remains solid in our Chenal Valley, master planned community in Little Rock Arkansas, as we generated $9 million of EBITDDA in the third quarter. Residential lot sales remained strong with 48 lots sold in the third quarter and we closed the sale of two more commercial real estate lots, for an average price of $183,000 per acre in the third quarter. We have closed at least one commercial sale every quarter this year, for an average price of $275,000 per acre. Turning to financial items, which are summarized on Slide 13. Our total liquidity was $773 million. This amount includes $484 million of cash, as well as availability on our undrawn revolver. We plan to refinance the $40 million of debt scheduled to mature in December 2022. We have locked the refinance rate, which will reduce our interest rate approximately 100 basis points on this debt, resulting in lower annual interest expense of approximately $400,000. CatchMark had $300 million of debt when the merger closed in September. We used about half of our forward starting interest rate swaps, to refinance $277.5 million of CatchMark's debt, at a fixed rate of 1.8% net of patronage and we used cash to pay off the remaining $22.5 million of CatchMark's debt. We also applied CatchMark's interest rate swaps to reduce the interest rate on $150 million PotlatchDeltic term loan, by over 200 basis points. Overall, the refinance and the use of CatchMark swaps reduced the combined company's annual interest run rate by $8.5 million. That amount is significantly higher than the amount of interest savings that we expected when we communicated our CAD synergy target last May. In aggregate, the interest savings reduced our weighted average cost of our outstanding debt from 3.1% to 2.4%. We've largely been precluded from discretionary share repurchases since our first quarter earnings call, due to the CatchMark merger and SEC rules. We were required to suspend our 10b5-1 plan in August when a registration statement was declared defective. We remain committed to repurchasing our shares at attractive prices and we look forward to our trading window reopening in early November. We expect to pay another special dividend in December. While the actual amount is dependent upon our financial performance for the rest of the year, we believe that this year's special dividend will be much lower than the $4 per share we paid in 2021. Capital expenditures were $13 million in the third quarter. That amount includes real estate development expenditures, which are included in cash from operations in our cash flow statement and it excludes timberland acquisitions. As Eric mentioned, we were the successful bidders on three bolt-on timberland acquisitions in Mississippi and Arkansas earlier this year, for $101 million in the aggregate. We use cash to close all three transactions including $16 million to close the last of the three transactions in October. I'll now provide some high-level outlook comments. The details are presented on Slide 14. We expect to harvest 1.8 million to 1.9 million tons in our Timberlands segment in the fourth quarter. Harvest volumes in the North are planned to be comparable to the third quarter. This is higher than typical for the fourth quarter, as our team is working to reduce the third quarter harvest shortfall. We expect Northern, sawlog prices to decline about 25% in the fourth quarter. In the South, we plan to harvest 1.4 million tons in total in the fourth quarter. This volume includes approximately 400,000 tons of sawlogs and pulpwood from the CatchMark acres. We expect our Southern sawlog prices to increase modestly, due primarily to a higher mix of CatchMark's stronger southern markets. We plan to ship 265 million to 275 million board feet of lumber in the fourth quarter. This assumes that the Ola Arkansas sawmill startup remains on track. Our average lumber price thus far in the fourth quarter is approximately 10% lower than our third quarter average lumber price. This is based on approximately 100 million board feet of lumber. Our lumber spot price is approximately 11% lower than our third quarter average lumber price and our prices started firming recently. As a reminder, a $10 per thousand board foot change in lumber price equals approximately $12 million of consolidated EBITDDA for us on an annual basis. Shifting to real estate. We expect to sell approximately 1,500 acres of rural land and 23 Chenal Valley residential lots in the fourth quarter. Additional real estate details are provided on the slide. Our total capital expenditures are planned to be in the range of $85 million to $90 million in 2022 excluding acquisitions. This estimate includes approximately $18 million for the Ola rebuild, which we expect will be reimbursed by insurance. The estimate also includes $12 million deposit for the Waldo modernization expansion project that we announced in June. Overall, we expect our total adjusted EBITDDA will be lower in the fourth quarter due to lower lumber and index sawlog prices. Having said that, lumber prices remain at attractive levels. We're well positioned to continue growing shareholder value over the long-term. So that concludes our prepared remarks. Lisa, I'd now like to open the call up to Q&A.

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Mark Weintraub with Seaport Global.

As you're thinking about capital deployment, so you talked about you're going to have a special dividend. You talked about an appetite for share repurchase with the stock where it's at. You've done a number of acquisitions. Are you still on the lookout? Is that still part of likely capital deployment in the next six, 12 months? And then tying it all together, what type of balance sheet or other metrics should we focus on in understanding what your comfortability and target type ranges are?

So, Mark, this is Eric. Yeah, our appetite is -- we want to continue to try to grow the company through timberland acquisitions. And you're right we've been successful this year, not just with CatchMark, but also with 46,000 acres and $101 million or so that we spent on the bolt-ons. What I'd tell you is that the timberland market is getting in our opinion a little bit overheated. For example, we competed here recently in two different tracks. We lost these deals. One of them was attracted in Georgia. We went to nearly 22.5 times EBITDDA. And the other one was in Alabama. We lost this one as well. We went to 23.5 times EBITDDA. Both those transactions we went to the low end of our discount rate range. We lost both of them. And we were told we were in the middle of the pack of bidders. So that means people are paying north of 22, 23, 24 times EBITDDA for timberland. And that's the max that we're going to go, given our current discount rate range. So while we like to continue to grow and we will continue to compete and we'll try to take down timberland M&A because we think it's a very attractive asset class. There is a point at which it no longer creates shareholder value. And so in our mind, we're going to have to pivot here -- with our strong balance sheet, with our cash that we have on the balance sheet we're going to have to pivot into other capital allocation priorities. And coincidentally, our average analyst estimated NAV is up around $63 a share. And as we sit here today, we're at I don't know $44 a share. We're trading dramatically below what people believe our NAV is. And so it seems to us like it presents just a fantastic time. We -- honestly, we've been waiting for this opportunity to step in and buy shares for some time. We've said all along we want to buy stock when it's depressed, not when it's at fair value. And well guess what? Today it's depressed and it's time for us to step in and put our money where our mouth is. And that's going to start happening about a week from today. So I'm going to let Jerry answer the second question on balance sheet. But does that answer your question on the first half?

Yes, that's super. Thank you.

Yes. So Mark, picking up on the kind of the balance sheet part of that question, I would say overall really no shift or change given our posture and our metrics in terms of how we manage that balance sheet. I mean at a high level, having strength and flexibility has served us well in the past and we plan to maintain that going forward. And as a reminder, our EBITDDA leverage, which is a key metric that we monitor and talk to our credit rating agencies with, is EBITDDA leverage and we continue to expect to maintain that in the 3.5 to 4 times range. Today, we find ourselves under one. So, a lot of flexibility there. But the long-term goal through a cycle, which I should emphasize here, really remains in that 3.5 to 4 times range. And we like to have a bit of cash, again to be opportunistic and have some flexibility. In the past, we've talked about having a minimum of $100 million of cash -- on the balance sheet. So, no change there.

Okay, super. That's very helpful. And obviously, when you're talking about 3.5 to 4 times, that's kind of over the cycle. So, we can't necessarily look at the current EBITDA, which is presumably -- you have been at extremely high level. So, you're presumably using different numbers internally when you think about what that translates into in terms of a gross number. Is that fair?

That is spot on Mark. We -- when I look at that 3.5 to 4 times target, we're really modeling and stress testing a low point in the cycle kind of perspective, because we want to maintain debt levels kind of under that range even at a low point.

Okay. Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Kurt Yinger with D.A. Davidson.

Great. Thanks, and good morning, everyone.

Good morning.

Just wanted to start out on the special dividend. And Eric, you touched on it a bit in the prepared remarks, but I mean with three quarters in the books and some stability here in the lumber markets, is there any way you could maybe help us quantify a range of what that might look like, as well as how you're thinking about any discretionary component versus share repurchases or other capital deployment opportunities?

Yes. So, I'll actually take that one Kurt. This is Jerry. In terms of stepping back, as a reminder for the group we mentioned this in the prepared comments, but we paid a $4 per share special dividend last year. And I think we've had a position -- at least the last couple of quarters, it feels like where we said, this year's special dividend is going to be significantly lower. And there's a number of factors that play in. And first and foremost, it's really important. I think we must have mentioned between Eric and I four times in the prepared comments, the priority that share repurchases and the attractiveness of share repurchases at the current discount that we trade. And deviating a little bit here, and I'll get back to the point of the question, we just put a new $200 million share repurchase authorization in place. Our window reopens November 1. So, to the degree we can shift capital to share repurchases from a special to the degree we have that discretion. That makes all the sense in the world to us again given the discount that we trade at today. When you go back to that $4 per share special dividend that we paid in December of 2021, I mentioned this on last quarter's call, but there is a 40% discretionary component to that. I mean overall, the special dividend is primarily to protect our REIT status by kind of purging excess cash from the taxable REIT subsidiary, but we also included a 40% discretionary component on top. And as a reminder, we're trading around $60 a share last year versus the $44 that Eric talks about today. So, clearly that capital allocation set of priorities have shifted. And when you think about other moving parts, Idaho sawlog prices, when you step back for the full year, probably down about 30% year-over-year so that's going to reduce kind of the amount that's needed for a special dividend. Lumber prices are down as well. Again, that really goes into the amount of cash that we have to purge out that taxable REIT subsidiary. And we've also grown the regular dividend. Payout, for example, just with the shares we issued in the CatchMark merger, is up $20 million year-over-year and that effectively shifts -- potentially would have been special dividend dollars over into the regular dividend bucket. So, for all those reasons, it's hard to pin down the number exactly this year. We'll sit down with the Board in early December when we review it. But it feels like, it's probably in the $1 per share range, maybe just a bit under $1 per share just to give some benchmarks.

Got it. Okay. That's all very helpful. And then, I guess, in terms of northern sawlog prices for the -- Waldo project you've used $500 and we're about there now. So we will just use that. But I mean there's some variability with the timing of indexing and log density. But I guess, if you were to kind of use that $500 per thousand assumption. Is something in the $130 a ton

Yes. And I guess to clarify Kurt, I'm assuming you're talking 2023 in its entirety and if that's the case that is a reasonable proxy.

Got it. That’s superful helpful. Appreciate the color and I’ll turn it over. Thank you.

Thanks.

Your next question comes from the line of George Staphos with Bank of America Securities.

Thanks very much. Hi, Jerry. Hi, Eric. How are you? Good quarters here. Quick question for you on Northern harvest and contractor availability what are your plans? How do you expect to be able to get more contractors and more production in the fourth quarter? If you could give a bit more color that would be great.

You bet. It feels -- so this is Jerry, George. It feels a lot like what we experienced in the South a year or two ago when we had contract availability issues. And really starts with -- there isn't really much in the way of surge capacity when you think about log-in haul contractors. I mean over time hear about tight labor markets and it also feels like there's been a bit of migration as the contractor workforce ages out. So I think there's a challenge in, kind of, replenishing the folks that are working in that space. So you start with a pretty tight surge capacity. Our team does a really good job over time managing in that tight environment. But when you layer on top of it things like equipment breakdowns the contractors have and then all of a sudden supply-chain issues and getting critical spare parts and delays it starts to have a kind of a ripple effect. And then once you get behind without that surge capacity it's really hard and quite frankly it's impossible to get caught up. So that's a bit of what the team was wrestling and came to the forefront in Q3. Now in terms of what do you do to manage through that as a large player in Idaho that certainly helps because we have deep and long-term relationships with some good quality contractors. So just really effectively managing and leveraging those relationships to make sure we get the, kind of, the focus that we need and when I think about just in terms of some color on where do we think we'll land in the harvest in Idaho for the year? We're about 200000 tons short against our plan year-to-date in the end of Q3 the team -- if things weather holds and having said that it's got a little wet here so it either needs to dry out or freeze up. I can't be in this middle ground. But if weather holds, we'd probably make up about half of that shortfall and end up about 100,000 tons short. Now flip side is we're obviously running well ahead in the South. So overall from a harvest volume standpoint we're actually up versus what we had expected at the start of the year.

But aside from leveraging your relationships, I mean, does it mean that the incremental margin on those harvests when they do come in on the production would be maybe a little bit lower in terms of other incentives that you might be even to offer to more availabilities? I wouldn't imagine there's much but is there any sort of capital involved in doing that as well, just a couple of quick thoughts on that, as well.

So in terms of cost, I mean the big story when you think about log & haul costs this year is really diesel. You step back certainly our log & haul rates are up. But that probably explains something on the order of 75% 80% of the increase in cost. Now, having said that, there's fairness in the premise of your question which is that rates have gone up as well because of tightness and that's true both in the South and in the North.

And what I would just add George is when you look at the fourth quarter we're targeting 450,000 to 500,000 tons of sawlogs more or less and maybe a little bit of pulpwood. All we really need to do in Q4 is to do what we did in Q3. And Q3 was a challenge for us, no doubt. But we still got nearly 500,000 tons in Q3. So all we got to do in Q4 is, do the same thing. It's just that we typically build our log decks earlier in the year. We typically build them in Q3. And this year some of that slipped into Q4.

No that's great. Eric, that makes sense. One sort of quick question kind of a bigger picture one though. So we tend to think about the fourth quartile, being roughly $500,000 per board feet -- $500 per thousand board feet on the -- and we tend to look at British Columbia as kind of setting that point. How do you expect the fourth quartile to evolve over the next year or so recognizing it's hard to project that? Do you think it declined cyclically? Do you think it hangs in at that level and why? And then, on repair and remodel, we understand given all your sources that you expect that that will remain pretty stout into 2023 and 2024. But intuitively shouldn't we expect repair and remodel to drop a bit with housing starts and so much a repair and remodel comes from the activity that happens once somebody -- I shouldn't say housing starts but home purchases after the person buys a home and starts remodeling it in that first year. Thanks guys and good luck in the quarter.

Yeah. Thanks George. So your question on fourth quartile kind of the cost curve if you will, how is it going to evolve over the next year or two. I frankly don't think it's going to change a whole lot. We know where there are structural issues with lumber in North America from a cost standpoint. And that's British Columbia and increasingly the Pacific Northwest. The harvest volumes are coming down over on the West side roughly 10% over the next couple of years. It's not just British Columbia. So frankly it's going to stress mills for sure. And you're seeing some curtailments right now up in BC in particular. But it's not -- all these mill closures are not going to happen overnight. If you ask me 10 years from now where do I think the cost curve is going to be? It will be maybe $450 not $500 for that fourth quartile segment. But in the next year or two, I think it stays up in that $500 zip code. People are -- nobody likes to close sawmill and let employees go. And it disrupts residual streams and that has implications for pulp mills and pulp mills and lots of things. So I don't think the roster changes materially over the next year or two. Now with regard to repair and remodel, yeah, sure, you're right. As new home sales come down that is going to have a tendency. That effect alone will tend to push down R&R. But I think more R&R expenditures are for when somebody buys an existing house or is living in a house that they kind of feel trapped in for a lack of a better word because they can't afford to move into a new house. I don't think people typically go buy a new house and then say, oh, let's remodel this brand-new house that we just bought. I think it tends to be more, older more existing kind of houses if you will. So yeah, there's no doubt. On the one hand fewer new home sales will put some downward pressure on R&R spending. But I think all the other factors that we laid out between record home equity levels, strong job market, consumer balance sheets are in great shape. I think all those factors outweigh the fact that new residential starts are going to be coming down.

Yeah. And I really meant to say existing home sales, trending lower having more of an effect on repair and remodel. But your point is about feeling trapped the age of the home stock …

Yeah.

…and so on is important as well. I'll turn it over. Thank you, guys.

Great. Thanks, George.

Your next question comes from the line of Ketan Mamtora with BMO Capital Markets. …

Thank you. Eric, can you talk a little bit about, channel inventories on the lumber side, both in Retail as well as on the Pro side?

Yes, I can talk about them in general, Ketan. We don't really track them closely. Once they leave our mills and they go to customers, it's just anecdotal evidence that we pick up from talking to folks. And our understanding is that they're at really low levels. And the home center takeaway, it's at or above pre-pandemic levels. So our home center business is rock solid right now. And our sense is that most of that uptick that strength, if you will, is coming from the pro-contractor side as opposed to the DIY side. But our view is that inventories throughout the channels are relatively low, and especially in R&R demand remains very strong.

Got it. That's helpful. And then, maybe switching to the real estate side, Eric can you talk about the opportunity that you have on the CatchMark portfolio, in terms of alternative streams of revenue? If you can touch on -- touch upon solar that would be helpful as well.

You bet. So, I'll take that one Ketan. This is Jerry. In terms of CatchMark real estate opportunities, that's one of many reasons why we're really excited about having completed this deal. As we laid out in our kind of announcement slides back in May, a lot of CatchMark's land is proximate to some large population centers and that's different than what we've had in our rest of our southern acres in our legacy holdings. So, that by itself, we think, creates a lot of opportunities. The other trend we've seen -- and we closed, to our knowledge is the first solar deal earlier this year and the first quarter and that was very attractive. Certainly, we see those kinds of opportunities in CatchMark's footprint as well. And the other thing I will share is, once we close the deal, we did the same thing with Deltic, we did the same thing with Luter [ph], which we close last December. As we go through and we actually take our teams, our expertise and knowledge, and we go through it and we stratify every one of those acres. And that process is underway. It will take our team probably six to nine months to really kind of go through the whole portfolio. It doesn't mean that we're not going to sell real estate off a CatchMark land before then. We will. In fact, we expect probably just under 1,000 acres in the fourth quarter, for example, here. But that's where we're really kind of surface and start to gauge what is the magnitude of that opportunity above and beyond what CatchMark was doing historically? So, stay tuned. We'll come back and provide an update as we complete that stratification process.

Okay. That's helpful. And then just one other question. What is the right way to think about sustainable harvest with CatchMark sort of completion, and if you can break that between the North and the South?

Yes. So in terms of sustainable harvest, I mean one -- I mean obviously, we've got a lot of moving parts this year with the $101 million of bolt-on timberland transactions. We've got CatchMark in the midst. And we're also in the throes of our budget process. And as part of that we go back and we recalibrate our harvest plans going forward long-term not just for next year. So, if I were to step back, and we'll provide guidance once we finish that process here when we release fourth quarter earnings. But give or take, it's probably around 8 million tons. Again, the actual number will depend upon probably a bit above 8 million tons, but it will be -- we'll come back with that information. And then, you've seen the historical run rate in Idaho. We haven't added or subtracted from Idaho, so a delta is going to be in the South.

Got it, and that’s helpful. I’ll turn it over. Good luck.

Thanks.

Thanks.

Your next question comes from the line of Mike Roxland with Truist Securities.

Thanks, Eric, Jerry appreciate you taking the questions. First question, just was on CatchMark. Now that you've had some time to digest the acquisition, is there anything that you were not expecting going into the transaction? Just from my background with the industry and certain interactions with the company, CatchMark has historically been, I think somewhat aggressive with their harnessing level. So I'm wondering if there's anything that as you've had time to look through and look at things more carefully, whether things really did haven't worked out. And it could be just maybe one or two things that are off a little bit, but is there anything that you weren't expecting, now that you've closed the transaction?

Mike, I would -- I don't -- I would say, no, to be honest with you like we mentioned in our prepared remarks, the harvest volumes are coming in spot on. And we talked about this when we announced the merger, we'll be in this 1.6 million 1.8 million tons for the next, who knows eight nine years. It will dip 100,000 tons or so as you get out into the future, for a couple of years and then it comes right back. So we're not disappointed with the timber inventory. Pricing has met our expectations. It's kind of hit our merger model, if you will. And frankly, for the next three to four years as I recall, we really don't have much pricing increase in CatchMark's markets. The only real surprise, I would say is -- and Jerry talked about, this is our refinance opportunities have only gone up compared to where they were before. So I would say, no, their assets are good. We'll see how the real estate stratification plays out. But I've got to believe with CatchMark's ground being closer to major metropolitan kind of urban areas Atlanta, Colombia whatnot, I would have to believe the real estate opportunity is going to be better than what we initially thought too, but we got to give the real estate team time to go through their stratification. But, no, we've been very pleasantly surprised so far.

Got you. And just last question is on lumber order price [ph]. I think last quarter you mentioned new restructuring at a couple of weeks. Have they shorted it at all just given what's happened in [indiscernible]?

No. They really haven't, Mike. They're still in the one- to two-week kind of

Got it. Thanks very much.

Thanks,

Your next question comes from the line of Paul Quinn with RBC Capital Markets.

Yes, thanks for that. Good morning, guys.

Good morning.

Just a question on timberland markets. It sounds like you lost a couple of deals, and it seems like I'm seeing timberland prices remaining strong despite rising interest rates and therefore, discount rates why is that?

Paul, I think people love the timber asset class number one, this notion that it's a hedge against inflation, scarce resource. I honestly think, carbon is starting to get priced into some of these valuation models. We haven't explicitly priced it into our model, yet. But I'll tell you, we are working on some carbon projects. So I would not be surprised, if at some point in time in the future, there's a line item in our cash flow statement that says carbon. I think the other thing, is kind of interesting is that, non-traditional buyers increasingly are showing up to bid on these tracks. And I'm referring to Apple. I'm referring to IKEA. IKEA now has -- this is a furniture retailer IKEA, now has I don't know nearly 150,000 acres of Southern Timberland. So I think the asset class is increasingly attractive, not just from carbon but also these other nontraditional buyers. And it's putting -- and one also you look at what's happening up in BC and the Pacific Northwest with harvests coming down, the action is in the South and that's where most of the deals are happening.

All right. And then specifically on carbon, how are you going to monetize that, or what's the framework we should be thinking about, if we wanted to pencil some value in for carbon?

Well, I would tell you that it's very early stages, number one. But number two, at this stage of the game, carbon values don't compete with sawlog values. They're not even remotely close. But I will tell you, there are some tracks that maybe are not super highly attractive plantation-style forestry, maybe like a hardwood stand for example, where carbon values could outpace what that hardwood value might be. And it's too soon for me to say, because we're at the early stages, talking to a couple of different parties, about monetizing some of this ground, but we'll see how it plays out.

Okay. And then just switching over to real estate at a high level. What are your expectations for 2023 in that portfolio?

So, I appreciate the attempt, Paul. But like I said, we'll come back in our Q4 release and we'll provide guidance on 2023. I mean historically, rural -- and we've been in that 20,000-acre range. That's certainly going to be lower because, Minnesota, as we've mentioned in the last couple of quarters is essentially done. So, I don't know if it's half, a little more than half of that 20,000 is a decent placeholder at this point. And then, our average in all run rate for residential lot sales has been somewhere in the 150, 160 lot range. Now, we're at 180 this year. But obviously -- and we still see some relative strength in that market, but it'd be a little premature to look forward to '23 and say we'll have a repeat at the 180-lot level.

Okay. That’s helpful. Thanks very much guys.

Thank you.

All right. Thank you, Lisa. And thanks everybody for your questions and your interest in PotlatchDeltic. To recap, our year-to-date 2022 results are very strong. We look forward to providing updates on the performance of our leverage to lumber strategy, our integration at CatchMark and our progress on increasing shareholder value.