KRUS - NASDAQ

Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Kura Sushi USA, Inc. Fiscal Third Quarter 2023 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants have been placed in a listen-only mode, and their lines will be open for your questions following the presentation. Please note that this call is being recorded. On this call today, we have Hajime Jimmy Uba, President and Chief Executive Officer; Jeff Uttz, Chief Financial Officer; and Benjamin Porten, Senior Vice President, Investor Relations and System Development. And now, I'd like to turn the call over to Mr. Porten.

Thank you, operator. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you all for joining. By now, everyone should have access to our fiscal third quarter 2023 earnings release. It can be found at www.kurasushi.com in the Investor Relations section. A copy of the earnings release has also been included in the 8-K we submitted to the SEC. Before we begin our formal remarks, I need to remind everyone that part of our discussion today will include forward-looking statements as defined under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and therefore you should not put undue reliance on them. These statements are also subject to numerous risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from what we expect. We refer all of you to our SEC filings for a more detailed discussion of the risks that could impact our future operating results and financial condition. Also during today's call, we will discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures, which we believe can be useful in evaluating our performance. The presentation of this additional information should not be considered in isolation nor as a substitute for results prepared in accordance with GAAP. And the reconciliations to comparable GAAP measures are available in our earnings release. With that out of the way, I would like to turn the call over to Jimmy.

Thanks, Ben, and thank you to everyone for joining us today. I'm pleased to announce another excellent quarter for Kura Sushi, both in terms of restaurant-level performance and corporate initiatives. Year-over-year revenue has grown by approximately 30%, driven by our aggressive unit growth and industry-leading comparable sales trends. Our G&A leveraging efforts continue to bear fruit, with an improvement of 130 basis points over the prior year, as well. I’m exceptionally proud to see Kura Sushi continue to mature as a company as it expands its footprint and takes strides towards greater profitability. Third quarter revenue was $49.2 million, with comparable sales of 10.3%, which breaks down to 3% traffic growth and 7.3% in price and mix. [indiscernible] continued to lead the casual dining industry with our third quarter traffic or outperforming industry averages by 830 basis points. June performance has been even better with total sales of $17.6 million and the comps of 14.7%. As these results demonstrate, guests [indiscernible] for Kura remains extremely strong. The inflationary pressures that we saw earlier in our fiscal year continued to ease with cost of goods sold as a percentage of sales coming in at 30%, which is in line with all the time best, we saw in fiscal 2022. Labor cost as a percentage of sales were 29.2% representing an improvement of 180 basis points over the prior year. Our third quarter restaurant-level operating profit margin of 23.5% represents an improvement of 100 basis points over the prior year. I'm also very happy to note that between our growth in restaurant-level operating profit margin and the improvements in G&A, we were able to grow our adjusted EBITDA margin by 200 basis points over the prior year under our net income margin by 210 basis points. During Q3, we opened one new restaurant Buford, Georgia and one more new restaurant subsequent to the quarter end in Framingham, Massachusetts for a total of seven new restaurants opened to-date during the fiscal year. We have seven units under construction, as well as 11 more executed produces (ph). We are in an excellent position to achieve our unit growth goals for fiscal ‘23 and couldn't be happier with the pipeline, we have showed up for fiscal ‘24. Our new Waitlist app have been successfully rolled out across our entire restaurant system. While it's too early for us to provide quantitative data on its impact, we are very encouraged by early results. Wait (ph) times are meaningfully more accurate and we believe, this is part of why we continue to outperform our peers in terms of traffic, which is further underlined by the exceptional performance we've seen in June. Our revised membership continued to grow with approximately 120,000 new members, over the course of the quarter. Our Demon Slayer campaign held during April and May, again, improved to be another great success and comp driver and our current collaboration with We Bare Bears, a television program on Cartoon Network has far exceeded our initial expectations and has delivered some of the strongest guest responses we've seen of any collaboration which set our restaurants up for our amazing journey. As a final note, I would like to provide some updates on pricing. We lapped approximately 2% of pricing on March 1, bringing our effective repricing for our fiscal third quarter to 13%. Subsequent to the quarter, we lapped 6% of pricing on July 1, which was partially offset by 2% of pricing that we took concurrently. Relatively modest scale of this most recent pricing event reflects our confidence in the normalization of inflationary pressures seen earlier in the fiscal year. Lastly, I would like to share my deep appreciation for the amazing work by our employees both at our restaurants and corporate support center. Thank you, everyone. And with that, I'll turn it over to Jeff to discuss our financial results and liquidity. Jeff?

Thanks, Jimmy. For the third quarter, total sales were $49.2 million as compared to $38 million in the prior year period. Comparable restaurant sales performance as compared to the prior year period was positive 10.3% with regional comps of 15.5% in California and 4% in Texas. Turning to costs. Food and beverage costs as a percentage of sales were 30% as compared to 29.7% in the prior year quarter. We're very pleased to see that the flattening of the inflation curve that began during our second quarter has continued to hold and we continue to be encouraged in the trends that we are seeing. Labor and related costs as a percentage of sales decreased to 29.2% from 31% in the prior year quarter. This decrease is due to incremental efficiencies created by the implementation of technological initiatives and sales leveraging from increased traffic and pricing. This leveraging was partially offset by wage increases. Occupancy and related expenses as a percentage of sales were 7.2% compared to the prior year quarter's 7.1%. Other costs as a percentage of sales increased to 12.5% compared to 11.5% in the prior year quarter due to an increase in marketing costs as well as general cost inflation. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of sales decreased to 14.2% as compared to 15.5% in the prior year quarter. On a dollar basis, G&A expenses were $7 million as compared to $5.9 million in the prior year quarter. As we've mentioned in the last several calls, leveraging our G&A line has been a main focus of ours this year. The quarter-over-quarter increase of $1.1 million represents an increase of 18.8% against a revenue increase of approximately 30%. We're very pleased with this level of leverage and we will continue to keep this as a main focus going forward while making sure that we continue to make the key hires necessary to fuel our aggressive growth, such as in our construction and in our operations departments. Operating income was $1.3 million as compared to operating income of $0.5 million in the prior year quarter. As a percentage of sales, operating income was 2.7% as compared to 1.2% in the prior year quarter. Income tax expense was $41,000 compared to a benefit of $2,000 in the prior year quarter. Net income was $1.7 million, or $0.16 per share compared to net income of $0.5 million or $0.05 per share in the prior year quarter. Restaurant level operating profit as a percentage of sales was 23.5% compared to 22.5% in the prior year quarter. Adjusted EBITDA was $5.1 million compared to $3.2 million in the prior year quarter. Turning now to our cash and our liquidity. At the end of the fiscal third quarter, we had $70.5 million in cash and cash equivalents and no debt. This large increase in our cash balance is due to the follow-on offering, which we closed in April of this year. Lastly, I want to reiterate and update the following guidance for fiscal year 2023. We expect total sales to be between $187 million and $189 million. We expect to open between nine and 11 new units with average net capital expenditures per unit of approximately $2.5 million. And lastly, we expect general and administrative expenses as a percentage of sales to be between 15% and 15.5%. Please note also that our guidance assumes no material changes as consumer behavior or broader macroeconomic trends. In addition, as mentioned during our previous earnings calls, at the conclusion of the current fiscal year, beginning with our first quarter earnings call, we will no longer quantify quarter-to-date performance. And with that, I'd like to turn the call back over to Jimmy.

Thanks, Jeff. This concludes our prepared remarks. We are now happy to answer any questions you might have. Operator, please open the line for questions. As a reminder, during the Q&A session, I may answer in Japanese before my response is translated into English. Thank you for your attention.

Thank you. We will now be conducting a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Jon Tower with Citigroup. Please proceed with your question.

Great. Thanks for taking the questions. Just curious, if you could dig in a little bit on the quarter-to-date, I believe you said 14.7% comps quarter-to-date. Do you attribute that primarily to the promotional activity that -- and I apologize for not following exactly the promo that's on air at the moment. But would you attribute most of that to the promotion and how long do you anticipate that promotion to stay intact?

Thank you, Jon, for your first question. Please allow me to answer your question in Japanese. Ben, do you want to translate? [Foreign Language] [Interpreted] Yeah. We're extremely pleased with the results with We Bare Bears, our marketing team did an amazing job with setting us up with that collaboration. And it's definitely -- it's played a very meaningful part in this 14.7% comps that we've mentioned -- all of our campaigns are over a two-month period. So began in June for We Bare Bear and we're going to go through the end of July with We Bare Bears. The historical pattern that we've seen is typically the exciting for Demon (ph) campaigns is greater in the first month than the second month. And so our expectations are relatively tempered for July’s We Bare Bears impact versus Demons (ph), but for the first week of July, the enthusiasm certainly help. We're very pleased.

Great. And just to kind of continue that line of thinking, I believe you had a planned promotion with DC Comics still on track for hitting in August, if I'm -- is that correct?

Yeah, absolutely. We Bare Bears is one of our first sort of nationally known American brands. And DC being another one of those brands, we're very excited about August. If we had to put anybody up again [indiscernible], I'm glad that it's DC.

Okay. And then just on the labor cost per operating week, I was just looking at that in the model and I was surprised to see it actually go down on a year-over-year basis considering, I'm assuming some of the inflation you're seeing. So can you perhaps speak to what the drivers were behind that? Anything funky in the last year's third quarter or -- are we just talking about a combination of sales leverage and technology rolling through the system and therefore, the sustainability of this trend moving forward? How should we think about that?

[Foreign Language] [Interpreted] Yeah. So looking at labor cost performance year-over-year, you're right, the two driving factors or the three driving factors, one would be sales leverage. The other would be the effectiveness of our three initiatives. We completed rollout at the end of Q3 of last year. And so this year, we had benefit for the full quarter from the server robots, whereas we only had a partial benefit in the preceding year. And the others, our operations team and our COO's taken store operationsm, store management or labor management. They made that one of their top priorities, and they’ve really been executing on that. And so we’re very pleased with where we’ve come in for Q3. In terms of sustainability on a go-forward basis, we would like to provide some more context because we’ll be coming up against some fiscal comparisons. Looking to Q4, historically, we’ve always seen leverage from Q3, Q4 and we do expect a degree of leverage, but certainly not in the range of 200 basis points or anything like that. The first factor being that the three initiatives have, they’ve been live for full 12 months, and so they’re baked in from a cost perspective. The other is that we had a bonus adjustment in Q4, which we don’t expect in Q4 of this fiscal year and so while we do expect leveraging in sales, basically, we think the way to look at it is just look at Q4’s labor as a percentage of sales and that’s probably going to get you pretty close to Q4 of this year as opposed to trying to triangulate from the quarter-over-quarter basis points stepdown that was in Q3 ‘22 to Q4 ’22 (ph).

All right. Thanks a lot. I’ll pass it along.

Thanks, Jon.

Thank you, Jon.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Joshua Long with Stephens. Please proceed with your question.

Great. Thank you for taking my questions. I was curious if you could talk about some of the trends through the quarter. I know as we left off last quarter, started off in that sort of low double-digit, 11% range, very strong. Curious if there's any additional color you could share on just how things transformed through the quarter overall and then maybe by region with the California and Texas comp numbers that you called out as well?

[Foreign Language] [Interpreted] Yeah. So looking at a regional basis, as Jeff mentioned in the opening remarks, California output for the Texas comps for this quarter, but that's on a single year basis. If we do a multiyear comparison, the comparison becomes much closer simply because the operating environment for California and Texas have been so radically different, especially for the last two, three years, the year-over-year comparison -- just the premium comparison can really determine your answer. In terms of the cadence of performance, yeah, March was strong. April was a little bit weaker, which I think is what everybody saw in the restaurant industry, then May was stronger and June is actually, we pretty more pleased with June with the 14.7% that we saw, very strong traffic. It's been a nice June for us. And I think, Josh, too, what's important to note is, we've mentioned this in conferences as well that our three best units are in Washington State and Texas and in New Jersey. So while certain regions, Texas, maybe better than California, some quarters and vice versa. We're very pleased and very happy to see that our three best restaurants are very geographically dispersed and we continue to do well pretty much in every region throughout the country.

That's super helpful. I appreciate the two points. When you think about trends, I think in the past couple of quarters, we've talked about pretty consistent per plate consumption, also have been trying to think about this from a marketing perspective in terms of, you mentioned the We Bare Bears being the first American or most widely known here in America. And then going into thinking about the DC comics. Are you pulling in a new guest, are you pulling in your kind of more frequent guests or your current guests more frequently? How do you think about that? And how does -- how has per plate consumption trended through 3Q?

[Foreign Language] [Interpreted] Looking at consumer sentiment, we -- per plate consumption and check has being flat. Check management has been pretty much minimal, negligible. In terms of the impact for We Bare Bears, so one of the ways that we're thinking about it is that, over the last quarter, we redeemed about 120,000 rewards members. And for all of Q4, we've been working with American properties. So We Bare Bears for the first two months and then DC Comics for the last month of August. And so our ability to attract the Board's members materially is a much larger number than we've seen in past quarters. And certainly, this would be something that we put into our strategic tool box. Yeah. So one -- we see a pretty strong correlation between the effectiveness of a brand collaboration with sign-ups because to get the better prices, the giveaway to the T-shirts, the Canister (ph), et cetera., you need to register as a member. And so a strong collaboration, certainly can fuel membership growth and that will be one of the ways that we're determinating the effectiveness of these brand collaborations.

Great. That's very helpful. One last quick one for me and then I'll hop back in the queue. When we think about kind of the marketing efforts. I think then in prior calls, you've talked about the opportunity to optimize your awareness to drive accessibility and it's been more about managing the current spend and again, optimizing versus adding dollars to the marketing pipeline. Can you square that off with some of the commentary you had in terms of the 3Q numbers that you just reported in terms of marketing kind of stepping up, it sounds like, is that kind of a one-time 3Q dynamic or how should we think about marketing and spend and then the overall kind of progress against our initiatives that driving awareness and optimizing the brand visibility?

[Foreign Language] [Interpreted] So Josh, I think what you're referring to is the comment in the other cost line, where we mentioned marketing costs being what are the drivers. But really, the marketing costs may be incremental by 10 basis points, 20 basis points, it really wasn't meaningful. As you mentioned in the past earnings calls, the new marketing strategies, particularly the targeted advertising [Technical Difficulty] Google's many channels, that's really just been a reallocation of marketing dollars. And as we've seen with the traffic performance, particularly in the last two quarters, we've been exceptionally pleased. We think our marketing dollars are moving very effectively. And so yeah, we don’t expect a big step-up or anything like that in terms of marketing spend in future – in any time in the near future. We’re very pleased with the performance.

Understood. Thanks very much for the time.

Thanks, Josh.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Sharon

Hi. Good afternoon. I wanted to touch on development because it's still a pretty wide range implied for the fourth quarter, anywhere between three to five new openings. And I know you've opened one so far. I guess, are you more comfortable at the lower end or higher end? I mean where is the status of that construction? I know everyone's been battling kind of permitting and delays and so on. So I'm just curious kind of where your comfort level is on hitting maybe the higher end of that?

[Foreign Language] [Interpreted] So the nine and 11 number that we shared, we're extremely comfortable with. Of the seven units under construction that we mentioned, most of them are pretty far along construction they're in the back half. And so hitting that higher end and certainly not outside of the moment possibility. For us to hit the lower end, I think, is a lot unlikely. It would really have to take sort of unprecedented delays -- and so yeah, I'd say we're very confident about the quality of our pipeline for the remainder of the quarter. And so that nine to 11, we're very confident in the number of units that we're already in the first week of July. And so the impact that the subsequent units can have in terms of the impact of fiscal '23 revenue, it's kind of beyond order of a month or less. And so that's not going to be super substantial. But that being said, our revenue guidance had baked that in. And so both in terms of revenue guidance and the unit pipeline, we're extremely comfortable with the numbers that we shared with discreet (ph).

Thanks for that. And then I know, for June, you talked about kind of the changes to the Waitlist algorithm, being a positive. I'm curious if there's any way to quantify that. And as you've had this in test with some locations longer, is that a benefit that kind of builds over time or is this something where you kind of manifest that improvement and kind of the lunch and/or a late-night day parts pretty quickly?

Yeah. So in terms of quantifying it, we just finished the rollout in Q3 and there's a six week learning period for the algorithm where it sort of takes in -- use that to build its traffic expectations. And so we're a little bit low to build because to -- provide numbers or numerical expectations. In terms of what -- your second question, I think, is really interesting about, does the impact build over time? And one thing that we've been discussing with the marketing department is that we rolled out these updates, these improvements to waitlist app is about really communicating that necessarily to our guests. And so the accuracy has improved, and I imagine the guest experience has improved, but there -- I don't think that guest behavior will change until there's a concerted marketing effort so let guest know that there actually -- has been a material improvement in our Waitlist app that they can build their schedule around it. And so now that we finished the rollout of the Waitlist app, we're working on the update to our new rewards program, which is going to have a new skin. It's going to look completely different from the existing one. And so the idea is that we're really going to bundle that communication with the rollout of the new apps. I can just say the app wasn't as great. The app is really great now, come to launch.

And also, Sharon, while we don't have the data yet to be able to quantify what it means in terms of sales or comps, the new Waitlist app. But we do know and the information we do have is that wait times are more accurate. And we do know that the over quoting or the underquoting of people by 0.5 hour or more has decreased substantially to where we – some restaurants could have been in the 20% to 25% range of people being misquoted by half an hour or more on their wait times. And we know now that in most of our restaurants, that’s down into the single digits.

Great. Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Todd Brooks with Benchmark Company. Please proceed with your question.

Hey. Thanks for taking my questions. Jeff, I wanted to ask about the G&A performance in the quarter. Obviously, very strong improvement, provided guidance for the full year range. But where are you -- and I know this is one of your priorities coming in as far as attacking this opportunity. And as we're starting to look at forward years, have you completed most of the efficiency efforts that you went after or is there more opportunity for efficiency as we look out to fiscal '24?

There are more opportunities for our efficiencies. One of the things I talked about in the past was being able to leverage some more technology in the support center, on some of our daily things that we do. We actually recently -- one of the first things we did is in our financial planning and analysis department, we're launching a new software for FP&A that will improve substantially, not only our forecasting and our budgeting, but also the research tools that we have in the support for the restaurants to determine what's going on with their P&Ls. And it's going to give our operators a tool to be able to dig deep into their financials on their own as well as having us in the support center help them. Not just one technological step that we've taken. I've asked other departments to really think about how can IT help you. What can we do? We saw really good leverage in the last two quarters, 120 bps in Q2 and 130 this quarter. Very, very happy with that. Quite honestly, exceeded my expectations a little bit and I'm very pleased and very happy with how the team has stepped up in the company in order to make that happen because this is not a single person effort. It's an effort of the entire company. And so what we did this year for the past nine months has slowed down our hires a little bit in the support center, continuing to hire in the areas where we need to in order to support our growth such as construction, development, recruiting, training and we're going to continue to do that. But we've asked people to really kind of do what they can to keep the hires at a minimum. So that's why we saw such good leverage. We are going to continue to see leverage going forward. I haven't provided any guidance on Wednesday will be in single-digit percentages. We will get there someday, but that's not necessarily in the next 12 months or 24 months, but we are very happy with the leverage that we've seen over the last two quarters.

That's great. And a follow-up question, if I may. Actually, a quick question on the pricing side. So I think the way that I heard you guys talking about the waterfall was 13% during the quarter. We lapped 6% at the start of July, but at the same time, we took another 3%. So kind of the back two months of the quarter, is it what we think about running maybe 10% effective price? Is my math right there.

Well, I was going to say, what you'll see is, there's a 6% and the 7% that we're in there for June. So in Q3, you'll see the 6% to 7%. And as we mentioned, we took -- we rolled off 6% on July 1, but we took 2%, so the pricing for July and August and will be 8% for each of those months. So 13% June, 8% July and August.

Perfect. Thanks. And my final one is.

I'm sorry. I'm sorry, 13%, June; 9% July and August.

Okay. Thanks.

It's 7% for December and at 2%, we just took.

Fair enough. And then the final one, $70 million of cash on the balance sheet after the offering. I know the team has talked about, listen, we're building to grow. We'll make the hires that we need to grow. I guess, between the brand's performance, landlord appetite to get Kura in two projects and now the magnitude of cash on the balance sheet, do you see any uptick in the opportunities to open or accelerate the unit openings? I think you talked about 11 leases signed already for the coming year. But just would like to know if the incremental capital and the readiness for the organization as you're thinking of growing any faster into the opportunity that the brand has in the U.S.

[Foreign Language] [Interpreted] So this is very similar to what we said in past earnings calls. But the way that we think about our unit growth pace is really in terms of free gating factors. First would be our liquidity. The second would be the availability of high-quality sites. And the third would be our management pipeline. As you mentioned, with our -- with the April rates, we're in the best cash position we've ever been in and the sites are great. And so -- for the last several years, the focus has really been on making sure the quality and breadth of the management pipeline is to really keep up with our [indiscernible] goals. And so what we've said historically is that 20% is what we think -- is what we [indiscernible] street when we went public. We tended to outperform that. And actually, we did 25% the year before 28%, midpoint of our guidance this year is 25%. And so that's the neighborhood that we're comfortable with and that's the number of neighborhood that we think that we can continue to deliver. One other thing that we've mentioned in past earnings calls is that just a sheer number of new markets that we're in. We're going through additional growing pains on -- in terms of building up regional management teams, not in terms of a regional manager by region. And so once these single unit markets become infills become two, three, four unit markets, then you get that sort of ability to self-sustain. And so that's another opportunity. But regardless just with the number, if you look at the number of units we've been putting out over the last five years, even if our growth as a percentage doesn't change, that number grows materially every year. And so we're very quick with our growth.

And to keep that growth trajectory going, Todd, it kind of ties back full serve to the G&A question you just asked. That's why we're going to be continuing to invest money into recruiting because it's all about eliminating potential bottlenecks. And as you mentioned, with the $70 million of cash on the balance sheet, we've eliminated a potential bottleneck for cash, we're set with cash for a while. But then as we continue to invest in the recruiting side, we want to make sure that we eliminate any potential bottleneck as it relates to hiring managers. So we're very well shored up in terms of development going forward to keep that pace.

Perfect. Thank you all.

Thanks, Todd.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Mark Smith with Lake Street Capital. Please proceed with your question.

Hi, guys. I want to follow up on the development question just a little bit. Any additional insights in what you're seeing on deals these days any change in TI dollars and kind of availability of real estate deals that you're looking at?

[Foreign Language] [Interpreted] So the biggest shift would really just be going from the smaller developers to really national developers. And national developers, especially if they're -- whatever mall they have is quite large, their TI dollars can be a lot bigger than a Mom and Pop Strip mall developer. And so we've seen that change, but that's more of a structural take. I don't think that's necessarily reflective of economic trends or anything like that. It's just a different position that we're in, in our growth cycle.

Okay. And then just wanted to look kind of further out. You guys did a good job driving margins here. You've got some initiatives that you talked about a little bit, like some back-of-the-house dish washing technology, things like that, that could maybe be margin drivers down the road? Any updates on that or any other initiatives that you have that maybe can help improve some restaurant margin as we look forward?

Yeah. There's absolutely. That's always the case. And so -- in terms of the dish washer, that is the single most exciting thing that we have in our pipeline. I'm very pleased to say that I'm actually now in charge of these initiatives. And so, you've got only one neck to strangle. But yeah, no, I've been extremely hands on. Right now, we're beginning the testing in a physical restaurant in Japan. Pending that, we're actually trying to get approval in the United States in parallel. And so unfortunately, it's impossible for me to give a time line on a moment to roll this out. But the impact from the dishwasher alone would be greater than the three initiatives that we rolled out last year. And so the upside is tremendous. Keeping in mind that with such a material change, this is -- the impact would probably be limited more to new restaurants, but it is something that I'm extremely focused on. But the other part about margin is, we're a growth concept. And so as Jeff mentioned in his opening remarks, our G&A grew by 18% against revenue growing by 30%. And so I can get to do my best to deliver incremental restaurant margin improvements, but really the meat of the story is in leveraging.

Okay. Maybe I'll squeeze one more in. You've talked quite a bit about labor. Are you guys seeing any difference in retention rates here over the last couple of months?

[Foreign Language] [Interpreted] So it's always been a point of pride for us that we outperformed industry turnover averages for pretty much the entire than we did in the United States. We think it's because we provide a really great place to work and our take home compensation is probably the highest of own casual dining restaurants. I think it's really hard to compare with the tips you can get with our efficiencies. But -- just being a relatively new concept to the United States, most people are familiar with revolving Sushi being in a lot of new markets. So for instance, if we're trading a management candidate outside of their home state, there's greater attrition associated with that. But that's really just a growing pain for us given our current position, where we are in the United States. We know that as we infill this is only getting it easier for us. And as I mentioned earlier, we're already meeting the industry average and so we're very happy with our retention.

Thanks a lot. Thank you, guys.

Thank, Mark.

Thank you. Our next question comes from George Kelly with ROTH MKM. Please proceed with your question.

Hi, everybody. Thanks for taking my questions. So first one for you on the -- back to the dishwasher, Ben, you were just going through your excitement around that. Curious, you said that, that alone should have a bigger impact than the three initiatives from last year. Can you just quantify and remind us those three initiatives and how much savings they drove?

Yeah. So the three initiatives is -- and as a reminder to the other people on the call, we're referring to the robot servers, the table-side payments and the touch panel three (ph) orders. Our expectation is about 50 basis points to 60 basis points in labor improvement from those three initiatives. And the dishwasher, we are confident would be more meaningful than that.

Okay. That's great. And then -- sorry, I interrupted.

[Foreign Language] [Interpreted] Keeping in mind that the impact on Cascade from when we put it in, just because it's not going to be -- the robot servers we put into all of our existing restaurants, the robotic dish washers will probably get on a go-forward basis. And so you're not going to see like a light switch. It will be a steady improvement. But the dish washers as we mentioned before, they're actually the highest paid position in the back-of-the-house or among the high state position because they're not eligible for tips. The one position that the DOL has not given us approval for -- our other employees are technically serving guests through the conveyor belts so they're eligible for tips -- and it's a physically growing job. And so it's an expensive position with high turnover and being able to automate this and make it easier for the better -- sort of the remaining person, their workload will -- the remaining workload, even for them will be materially less than what they're dealing with now. And so the benefits, it won't just be the restaurant level. It will be at the G&A level where we don't have to focus on recruiting and constantly replacing people and stuff like that. Yes, I'm really excited for it.

Okay. That's great. And then I think a question for me. If I look historically at your restaurant level margin, just the seasonality of that line, there's been a really nice step-up between 3Q and 4Q historically. And you just reported such a strong number. I'm just curious if there's anything I should be aware of that would make it hard for you to achieve that kind of step up again this year?

Well, I think the biggest thing, George, when you look at last year from Q3 to Q4, Jimmy already touched on this was we got such a big jump in labor. For last year because of the initiatives that we put in place. It was the first quarter where everything was fully in place last year between Q3 and Q4. So we got a lot of benefit between those two quarters. In addition, we took an incentive compensation adjustment last year in Q4 both of which we're not going to have those benefits in this year. So if you look specifically last year, be very careful that to assume that kind of a jump from Q3 to Q4 in terms of the labor line. What you've seen historically in the other lines, I think it's probably pretty consistent with where I would keep your eye on.

Okay. That’s helpful. Great. And then last question for me. I don't believe you've talked about this recently, but I remember as part of the IPO process, there was a TAM study that you guys did just about the number of units that you thought was a realistic goal? And then there was discussion about maybe updating that. Is that something you're still working on?

It's certainly not -- we don't have a new one. It's the sort of it. We're still very -- we've got about 50 units against that initial white space estimate of 300. And so we're not necessarily in a rush to update it. One of the trickier things that we've seen when exploring this is that I think for us, in our estimation, the biggest opportunity since we've gone public is really -- and it's unfortunate, but it's the mass closures of Japanese restaurants. And white space studies tend to focus more on demographics as opposed to competitive factors. And so we're -- that's the tricky part is figuring out how to bake in just how meaningfully the landscape has changed because the demographics haven't changed that much, but the competitive landscape has changed completely and so that's where we are. And we do know a true that when we did the TAM study at the IPO that the parameters that we used are very conservative. And we do know that we make very good money at sales levels that are below. what we used in the last whitespace study. So when we redo that, if we just lower some of the parameters, I think everybody on this call and we all know and we've even set at conferences that we believe that number is going to be much higher than 300 and we will, at some point, update that study as most companies do about five years or so from their IPO, which for us would be next summer. But fortunately, for us, it seems like analysts provide their own white space numbers for us. And so we haven't had to give a new one.

Thank you. I’ll keep guessing.

Thanks, George.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Jeremy Halan with Craig Hallum Capital Group. Please proceed with your question.

Thanks, guys. This is Jack Cole on for Jeremy. Congrats on the great quarter. So you mentioned that wages are still up year-over-year. Could you just clarify the magnitude of wage pressure in Q3? Is that still up high-single digits? And then just how do we think about wage pressure heading into FY '24?

[Foreign Language] [Interpreted] So I think in the last quarter, we mentioned that year-over-year labor inflation was about 10% and that's what we've seen largely to the case for our Q3. We've seen a little bit of easing. And so I think that's reflected in the pricing that we took being a lot lower than what we historically take -- than what we've taken over the last 1.5 years, I'd say it's a lot closer to what we've historically taken, which really speaks to our confidence in terms of where we expect our labor and our COGS to land or period of pricing is going to cover. But yes, low-single digits, mid-single digits of labor. And yes, we're very happy with where things are going.

Got it. That's helpful. And then related to the unit development again, what does the pipeline look like in terms of executed leases versus active units under construction? I think you mentioned seven under construction. So could you just clarify that? And then provide us the number of executed leases.

[Foreign Language] [Interpreted] Yeah. So it's -- we've got seven units under construction, most of them being in the back half of their construction phases. We've got 11 leases under -- 11 leases that have been executed and a number that are we expect to be executed any day now and double, triple, quadruple the number of LOIs. And so yeah, the pipeline is great. We're very happy with the pipeline.

Got it. Thank you. That’s all from me.

Thanks, Jack.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Joshua Long with Stephens. Please proceed with your question.

Great. Thanks for taking the follow-up. Wanted to see if we could dig into the inflationary environment, specifically in the food basket. You talked about how that is coming back in line like we had hoped and sort of expected here in the back half of the year. But I think in prior quarters, we had talked about an opportunity. You all had talked about an opportunity in terms of sourcing, maybe with some contracting around shrimp and salmon or some of the other key proteins. Curious if you could give us an update there. And then, Jeff, I know one of the other initiatives that was on the plate for, at some point, maybe a longer term was the ability to ship to a broadline distribution partner. And so just curious if you have any sort of update there, if any, in terms of just how you're thinking about that or maybe the timing and potential?

Yeah. I do have an update. So the broadline distribution project really goes hand-in-hand with talked about semi contracts for six months or a year or whatever. We'll be able to be in a much better position to do that once we get our consolidation underway. The update on that consolidation piece is that, in the past, we had talked about moving to a U.S. broadliner such as Cisco or U.S. Foods. And what we've done -- what we've decided to do is consolidate some of our Japanese broadline distributors, which we already use because what we found is that it was very difficult for the U.S. broadliner to get a hold of some of the very specialized Japanese ingredients that we use in our products, in our food. And since the Japanese broadliners that we use already have those, it's easier for them than to go get the mainstream type stuff. So what we're doing is we're consolidating down into two suppliers that we already use, and they are Japanese companies that have U.S. operations. And by doing that, we're going to have the entire country covered but more importantly, we'll make sure that the very hard to get specialty items that are used in Asian cooking, we'll be able to get. And so that's a process that we're doing in progress. We've already done. Many of our SKUs are already consolidated. And I expect that in the next several months, that will be done. In terms of the inflationary environment that we've seen, we have seen that continue to ease. We saw about a 2% quarter-over-quarter decline from Q2 to Q3, in our cost of goods sold inflation. So that line continues to move in a positive direction. And with all the work that we're putting into the supply chain and the consolidation of the distributors as well as the general economy seems to be smoothing out a little bit. All of those factors are working in our favor, and we're very happy going forward is what we're seeing on the COGS line.

That's super helpful commentary. In terms of just thinking about the 3Q inflation. I understand that, that 2% was quarter-over-quarter. What is that -- how would we kind of frame that up on a year-over-year basis?

What we talked about last quarter, it's in about the same range as we talked about last quarter, but what was most important to us is its easing.

Understood. That's super helpful. And then one of the key pieces in one of your questions earlier that came through is that it's not really about you're not capital constrained. You've got a great concept, lots of growth opportunities. You mentioned the importance of the human capital side. And so just curious if you could quantify or talk about that manager pipeline? And where are the biggest opportunities are to either develop talent, funnel talent into that or just how you're approaching that? Because that seems like that is the bigger piece of the overall growth rate going over time?

[Foreign Language] [Interpreted] So yeah, this sort of goes back to what we mentioned earlier, but we have a unique concept, and we're in a unique partner growth where the majority of our units are single unit markets. And so naturally, we're going to have growing pains associated with recruiting and training and HR. So that's also why that's really been the theme of our earnings calls for the last two years as we know that, that's be the most important gating factor, and we don't want to compromise on our growth. And so that's what we've really focused our efforts on. When we're seeing -- when we're discussing this, this is really have to be transparent about our priorities. What we don't want you to think is this is going to be like -- this is a serious enough concern that it's going to compromise our ability to grow. That's not the case at all. What we're saying is that this is simply the top priority for where we are. The other thing is that with America -- with our American operations working so well, and everybody is seeing tremendous opportunities for growth. There are a lot of Japanese expats (ph) that want to join the American route. And so we've got a dual pipeline of internal -- or really a simple pipeline of internal promotions from American store employees, Japanese employees that are banging down our orders because they want to be the next -- there's just tell us examples of people that have grown tremendously over the last several years and then the external hires as well. But yeah -- and so to summarize, this is -- I wouldn't call it an easy position that we're in, but I certainly we wouldn't call it a concerning position that we're in.

Totally understand. And to be clear, there's no concern on my part from that side, just knowing its restaurants there, an easy business, easy and hard to do, especially when you're trying to scale your procure. So I appreciate that perspective and the information there on the dual and triple pipeline, it's certainly encouraging. Appreciate the color.

Of course.