Yes, I'm ready. Okay. All right, everybody look at. There's kind of no way around it. It was not a good quarter, and I'm not happy about it. Colorado in particularly was disappointing. Just reminding everybody it was partly open in the first quarter. It opened just before New Year's and with only part of the hotel. And then it was more open in the second quarter, but in the third quarter it was mostly open. I mean, most of the spa opened early in the quarter. The only thing left from a customer perspective today, is some fancy lights and curbing in the parking lots. Everything else that a customer would see is open. Now, the expenses are up, not surprisingly. Back in 2023, for example, the total expenses in the four quarters were $4.3 million, $4.2 million, $4.8 million, and $5.0 million. That was really just Bronco Billy's with a little bit of Chamonix right at the end. And then as we opened the new property, it jumped in the first quarter to $9.1 million and then $10.3 million into Q2 and a $13.7 million in Q3. The bad news is, while revenues have been growing, they've been growing only as fast as the expenses. So the revenues back 2023, Q1 was $3.7 million, $4.1 million, $4.7 million, $4.5 million. And we weren't making a lot of money in 2023, because we had a lot of construction disruption. So it was understandable. And then in 2024, the revenue has been $8.7 million, $10.8 million and $13.0 million, which is good growth, but only as fast as the expenses have grown. And this results in little income and in fact, a small loss in the quarter. The good news is that when you look at the magnitude of the market, and particularly results of, particularly the results of comparable casinos and Black Hawk, our revenues have considerable room to grow, while the growth of our daily operating expenses, is largely behind us. I mean, there's some things like gaming taxes that grow with revenues, but things like payroll should not grow going forward, and our revenues should be able to grow. We also - and that should bode well for profits in 2025. And we also made some marketing expenses that didn't help the quarter. When we opened, we had an active kind of traditional advertising program around that opening. There was kind of a cute ad that was filmed in the midst of construction. And then, we essentially went dark in the spring and summer, as we were focused on getting the rest of the building open and building occupancy. And occupancy has built significantly. And in the third quarter it reached over 80% in September, when it was back at 50% in the spring. And when it was at 50%, we were like okay, let's get the occupancy up and let's be targeted about it. And part of what we did, is we started offering a program where we purchased mailing lists and provided free rooms on midweek days and rooms that would otherwise be sitting empty. And that did help build the occupancy. Well, it turns out that all mailing lists are not created equal. So there's one mailing list that we bought that was reasonably successful. It was a well-defined list, 15,000 people on it. And recognize the way this happens, you pay somebody to mail the people on their list, they don't give you the names generally. And then, you find out who responds to that? And then you find out the names. Well, somebody had a well-defined list. 15,000 people with a propensity to visit Colorado casinos, cost us about $1 per person to mail it to them. And we offered a free night midweek stay, which is when we would otherwise have generally had empty rooms. That particular mailing list, about 3% took us up on the offer. So 462 people out of 15,000, and that's not unusual. 3% took us up on the offer. So since you're mailing out 30 offers at $1 each to get one person, you have like $30 customer acquisition cost. And of those 462 people, 380 actually played. So you have an even higher customer acquisition cost if you get down to people who are actually playing. Now, there may be some people, we make them have a card to get the free room. Maybe some people played without having their card, so maybe the actual play was a little better than that. But in general, I think people do use their cards. And then on that particular mailing list, the average win per person was $180. Now, that more than covers the customer acquisition costs, and the gaming taxes and the cost to clean a room that would otherwise sit empty. So it's not hugely profitable. And after all, it's only 300 or 400 names. But it added 380 people to our mailing list, who we didn't otherwise know. And now we don't have the customer acquisition cost to go back to it. And that's frankly how one builds a business. Now, we had another larger mailing list that we bought that was less successful. It had 176,000 people on it. And it was kind of a black box. Somebody said, you know, these are people who have a proclivity to gamble, but they won't tell us how they know that. And you guys have all experienced this where you maybe you subscribe, to a newspaper or something, and then it's got a little questionnaire of what things interest you. And people click casinos. And therefore somebody comes to us and says, hi, here's a list of people who are interested in casinos. We don't know exactly what it is. They didn't charge us much for the mailing list, and they wouldn't tell us the criteria. Now, honestly, we should have tested it with a small subgroup, but we didn't. We were eager to try to get the hotel filled, so we sent out 176,000 offers at about a dollar a mailing. So $176,000, again, offering a free midweek stay. We only got 0.8% took us up on the offer. So it cost us over $100 to get a person to come to our casino. Customer acquisition cost then, frankly of those, only half gambled. And so, the customer acquisition cost like $200. And those that gambled, they only lost $48, which barely pays for cleaning the room. So that particular mailing list was a bust. And accounted for a few hundred thousand dollars. It was 1,382 room nights, which is over several weeks. It wasn't all one month, which is somewhere five or 10 points of our occupancy. Maybe most of those rooms would have otherwise been empty, because it was midweek, but in some cases, they may have displaced more profitable customers. So that particular promotion was a bust. Now, going forward, we will continue to do some mailing lists, but we're going to be a lot more careful about how we do it. And we're also resuming an advertising program. And Lewis mentioned there's an ad starts up today. We didn't want to compete with the high ad rates of the political season, so we started with it today. And we also had a very successful grand opening weekend, this past weekend for our VIP players with Jay Leno and all sorts of things going on. And it went very well. And you can see the ad. We also have a link, I think it's in there as well, to a drone video. And this is something we did in American Place, where you hire somebody to fly a drone through the property. It's too long a video to put on television or something, but you put it on the website and it's interesting to watch, and it goes viral. It's not all that expensive to make, and yet we can get. Well, we had tens of thousands of views at American Place, so hopefully we get something here. And we also just hired a new VP of advertising for the entire company, somebody who's got over 20 years of experience in the industry, and she starts next week. And she will help us make sure we're targeting the advertising correctly, and not wasting dollars. We're also seeking to hire more casino hosts, and more sales and marketing people. Now, a casino host is almost like a stockbroker. They bring with them customers, they know and knowledge how to expand that list. And then sales and marketing people, reach out to book meetings and conventions, which is very important to filling midweek periods profitably. We have had some conventions, like we had the Veterans Foreign Wars from Colorado. We had Funeral Home Directors Convention, which believe it or not, when they're not conducting funerals, they like to gamble. And we've had a couple of dart championships, which have done okay. We will have much more of a time. We have great meeting room space. But honestly, it's hard to get people to book meetings, and conventions before you're open, because nobody's quite sure if you're really going to be as nice as you say you will be. And over time, we will book those. And that's part of also building the business. And then you'll notice on the stuff that Lewis post, we're adding about 5,000 people a month to our mailing list. And so - and that's important over the long-term Like most casino companies, we tend to group our casinos into regions. I guess it's just become the norm. It makes it a little more complicated for our competition to figure out what we're doing. But this quarter, however, for transparency, I want to provide some additional numbers so that you guys all understand. And we don't intend to do this every quarter, but I'll do it this quarter. In Colorado, for example, our EBITDA or EBITDA, depending on where you went to business school is how you say it, in the quarter was a loss of $0.7 million versus a profit of $0.1 million last year, which reflects everything I just explained. Now in that segment, we also have the Grand Lodge Casino within the Hyatt and Incline Village at Lake Tahoe. Larry Ellison purchased that hotel a couple of years ago, and it is still run by Hyatt with us leasing the casino and running the casino. Ellison has indicated he intends to refurbish the hotel apparently extensively. And the first phase is to demolish most of the properties' banquet and meeting room space, which is in a separate building from where we are down along the beach. And so as a result, the hotel canceled and put off a lot of its meeting and group business this summer and did a lot less of that business than it normally did. Ironically, the owners pushed off their construction plans. I don't know whether they redesigned them or didn't get the permits, but it was too late to recoup that segment of the business. And so the hotel itself had weaker occupancy than normal over the summer and some of those groups are people who tend to gamble. And so principally due to that, our EBITDA was $1.8 million versus $2.2 million in the third quarter at that property. It's now having a very nice October, but that's what went on there. And I think it's a temporary thing that both the Hyatt and our casino there have been very consistent over the years, absent a snowstorm here or there in the winter. And I think they will eventually refurbish the hotel and make it even nicer than it is today. And hopefully, we're still running the casino and will do well, but that was what went on in the quarter. The other major segment we have has the Silver Slipper, Rising Star and American Place. Now the Silver Slipper did not have a great quarter largely due to an active hurricane season. I mean this time of year, I feel like you watch those storms come across the Gulf of Mexico, and they always seem to curve and it feels like God's bowling and I'm the tenpin every time. But we weren't actually hit by a hurricane, fortunately, but the several storms went to each side of us. And when it does, it affects our customers' ability and willingness to come to us. And so the EBITDA in the quarter was $2.6 million versus $3.6 million. So we were off $1 million there. Now this property has been capably run for many years since it opened by John Farucci, who's an industry veteran. He's retiring. And just this week, we relocated Angelika Truebner-Webb if I say it right, she [indiscernible]. She's from East Germany originally, but we transferred her from Rising Star to Silver Slipper. She started her career with us at the Silver Slipper in the finance area. We promoted her several years ago when we realized how smart she was to be the Finance Director of Rising Star. And then she became the GM at Rising Star. And frankly, she did a very good job at that geographically difficult property. And so she brings a fresh set of eyes to the Silver Slipper. And we do a lot of things right there, both on revenues and expenses. But I'm also pretty confident that a fresh set of eyes will find ways to do some things better. And now replacing her at Rising Star, we hired Jeff Mitchy from a major tribal casino in Arizona. Jeff had worked with Lewis and I many years ago when he was the Assistant General Manager at Belterra, which is 10 miles away from Rising Star. And in fact, before he worked at Belterra, he worked at Rising Star. And so for several years, he was the Finance Director and Senior Operations person at the large Hard Rock Casino in downtown Cincinnati. So he knows the area very well. He's actually been commuting for a few years from the Cincinnati where his family stayed to Tucson. And so we were happy to get him back with us and bring him back to the Tri-State area. Now he's also operated a number of casinos in this area, and he's operated casinos much bigger than Rising Star, and he knows how to open a new casino, which could be important if we get the approval to move Rising Sun to Fort Wayne. So let me digress for that for a moment. Rising Star was the first casino in the Tri-State area when it opened like 30 years ago, and it was very successful. But over the interim 30 years, newer casinos have opened in every direction from it, often closer to where the customers live. So today is the oldest and most geographically challenged casino in Indiana. It makes money, but not a whole lot, like $4 million or $5 million a year. In the recent past, the Indiana legislature has allowed two other first-generation casinos to relocate from where they originally had riverboats to better locations. One became the Hard Rock casino on Interstate 84 and Gary, and it's now the number one casino in the state. It went from being one of the lowest revenue ones to the largest. The other is the Churchill Downs casino that opened a few months ago in Terre Haute, and it's also been very successful. So the state has benefited significantly in terms of tax revenues and employment from the relocation of those casinos. So we have recently proposed and it's been in the press to relocate our casino in Rising Sun to a suburb of Fort Wayne, Indiana, and the name of that suburb is New Haven. Now Fort Wayne has about 650,000 people. It's the second largest city in the state and currently has no nearby casino. And we intend to do this in a way that is generous to Rising Sun and employees and the employees in Rising Sun. For example, we will make Rising Sun more than hold on the taxes we pay to them. We're the largest taxpayer in the community. And frankly, a casino in Fort Wayne would do enough better that we can continue to pay tax revenues to Rising Sun and be a big source of tax revenues in New Haven. Now we've recently opened a website on the proposal, which is all in on newewhaven.com. Now recognize that this takes legislative approval and state legislatures can be notoriously unpredictable. There's absolutely no certainty we get this. It may take more than one legislative session to get it. Sometimes it takes two or three if it ever does get approved. But if you don't try, you don't get. Now we just had the grand opening in Chamonix. We began working on that project in 2017. So it took us seven years. It's taken us a similar period of time with American Place. These things take a long time to get approved, get designed, get everything in place and get them built. So it's important to be realistic about it. And because otherwise, you guys are going to think we're crazy. I mean we're working to get Chamonix profitable. It just opened. We're trying to figure out how to finance and build the permanent American Place. And oh my God, you have another casino. Well, the other casino, if it happens, is going to follow the opening of the permanent American Place. And so it's a long ways down the road. And from a bondholder perspective, this strategy probably results in a series of refinancings. So for example, the existing bonds mature in 2028. So we would be looking at figuring out how to refinance those in the not-too-distant future anyway. Well, to finance the permanent American Place, we hope to call and replace that bond issue perhaps in mid-2025 when we hope to have demonstrated the success of Chamonix. And we've realize we have to prove that success before we can really go to the bond market in a good way. So if we get permission to relocate Rising Star, it probably results in calling that subsequent bond issue, maybe in 2028 or 2029 to arrange financing for new casino in Fort Wayne because bondholders are pretty smart. They usually have confidence in it that force you to pay them a call premium every few years. And that's just part of that business, and that's fine. And so hopefully, we are an improving credit throughout the period with each bond refinancing done on better terms. That's exactly what I did with Mirage Resorts in the 1990s and what we did with Pinnacle Entertainment in the first 10 years of this century. So on that, let me segue to American Place, which is the bright spot in the quarter. And if you're going to have one place up and the rest of them not so strong, it's good to have it be the most important casino we have. And so despite being in a temporary structure, it made $7.7 million of EBIT, which is a 13.3% increase over the third quarter of last year. It had a 17.6% increase in revenues. It's done that pretty steadily all year. Q3 was its best quarter to date, it continues to build a mailing list and improve margins month after month. There was another very positive development regarding American Place that has nothing to do with us actually. We get asked all the time, how can we be confident that the permanent American Place will do much better than the temporary one. Aren't we investing in the ballpark of $300 million to address the same people? And we answered, look, the permanent will be significantly nicer, have better curb appeal and those same people will gamble more or more people will comp. Well, there's a very analogous situation in Rockford, Illinois, where the Seminal Indian tribe about 3 years ago, opened a temporary casino pretty much like ours. It was a little smaller than ours, but it was -- in some ways, like its restaurants are probably better. Our casino floor is probably better. And they just opened their permanent casino at the end of August. And in the month of September, their revenues more than doubled, and I understand they've continued to be strong in October. And most of that seems to be growth in that market. They did penalize Grand Victoria a little bit I think they were up $7 million and Grand Victoria was down like $2 million. Grand Victoria would be the closest casino to Rockford. It had no impact on us. We're a couple of hours away. It had no impact that we could tell on Rivers. Grand Vic is a very older river boat, and there are some people who live in between Elgin, Illinois and Rockford. So those people came out of their driveway and some of them turned right instead of left. But for the most part, the permanent casino significantly grew the revenues for the Hard Rock. And Rockford by comparison is a metropolitan area with about 450,000 people. So at kind of its own Midwestern place that is two-thirds the size of Fort Wayne, just to put it in perspective, and they're doing $10 million or $11 million a month in revenues at this point. In a facility that's pretty comparable to what we intend to build as our permanent, both in terms of cost and quality. They did a good job. We'll have -- their theme is to hang Taylor Swift's old uniform up and people go at it. We'll have a little more interesting thing than that. But they do a good job. They're probably the best-run travel gaming operations in the country. And we're rooting for them because we think they're a good template for us. Now I will also note that we actually are doing pretty well in October and November with some swings in win percentage and there's some seasonality. But I'm hoping to have a fourth quarter that at least looks better than the third quarter. And then I think we're set up to have a pretty good 2025. I'd also note there's some other noise in the quarter. We sold Fallon in a 2-stage transaction. We're now between the stages. We sold the real estate for $7 million. And when they get licensed, we'll sell them the operating company for $2 million. Fallon is very small. It didn't fit in the portfolio. We hardly ever got there. We got a good price for it, and there was a couple of million dollar gain in the quarter. The prior year's results and that's, of course, a noncash -- well, it is cash, it's a gain. In the prior year's results, included the accelerated recognition of deferred revenue from market access fees. Now back when sports gaming was new and a lot of people were trying to get into it and before it concentrated down to a few major players, everybody was trying to get in. We didn't go and try to develop it ourselves, which would have been very expensive and difficult. So we licensed other people to operate under our licenses, but they had to pay a market access fee upfront. So Wynn, for example, paid us a market access fee, so they could operate online sports betting in Indiana and Colorado. And when Wynn decided to -- and when we got that market access fee, we had to put it on the balance sheet as deferred revenue, even though we got it in cash upfront, and it would be -- come into the income statement over time. Well, when Wynn decided to pull the plug on that business and exit, it accelerated the recognition of that deferred revenue. It's a noncash item at that point because we got the cash earlier, but that was a factor almost $6 million in last year's number. And the way GAAP works, we can't say, oh, that was extraordinary. And so if you just look at it on the surface, it makes the comparison look worse than it actually was. Lewis, did I miss anything? I went through a lot of stuff.