Thank you, Julie. In the third quarter, the large cap strategy is down 1.14% versus the positive 65 basis points for the index and year-to-date up 4.82 versus 7.97. In the quarter, the performance is somewhat interesting. We started to see the early signs of cyclical sectors of the portfolio, beginning to come under stress particularly in the industrial sector of the portfolio. United Technologies which is a large holding – they might feel a very positive toward, nonetheless, a particular important in the quarter as there were signs of international slowdown in its end markets. So the industrial sector was a bit of a disappointment. On the positive side, some of the financial services names which were a bit controversial in the first quarter this year, names like Citigroup, Morgan Stanley, J.P. Morgan started to perform better, especially Citigroup and that was a bit gratifying because our thesis continued to play out in those even as they came under stress in the first quarter of this year. The financials remain the largest sector in the portfolio by far, others including healthcare and industrials are large weightings. Consumer staples have – at the start of the year a larger weighting, has become a slightly smaller weighting in the portfolio but the financials at 26% are much larger as a sector than any -- even our healthcare at 14. Energy, which is a bit of a controversial topic and it is we’re often asked about is about 11% of the portfolio, not too much out of alignment with the index at 9%. Our exposure there is mostly in the E&P holdings, and we feel that those are the scarce assets, the ones that Tom was referring to a little bit -- similar types of ideas in terms of major exposure in the oil shales areas of the United States, the Bakken and the Permian and we feel that those companies should be able to continue to grow production in a lower oil price environment, although perhaps not as rapid rate as it was the past. But the stock price decline has been significant enough to make those sales and meaningful – and we still feel there’s good opportunity for the portfolio. In terms of the portfolio statistics, nothing too much stands out, the 17% portfolio turnover that's pretty normal for me. The medium market capitalization is towards the larger end of the universe. And in terms of new positions, Stryker is a healthcare company, high quality name which we followed in the past, its valuation has become more attractive in the sell-off and we’ve established a position there, we started to establish position there. And Goodyear which Chris Welch also mentioned is in the mid-cap, it's also in the large cap strategy. The entire auto and auto related sectors of the market have gotten hit very hard. This stood out as particularly inexpensive security and a name we want to put in the portfolio due to its cheap valuation. There was some sign of a slowdown in their offroad, their tire business and their core consumer and industrial tire business remains quite strong. [Indiscernible] Air Products, that was a name we sold to raise the proceeds to purchase the Praxair position and then General Mills which is a company we’ve known for a while and we’re seeing continued concerns and deterioration in topline fundamentals as both their read to eat cereal business and their yogurt business which are both very important end markets for them have come under secular pressure and quite frankly sale of General Mills was done in order to raise the cash to fund purchases in more attractive names such a Stryker and Goodyear. That concludes my comments and I will turn it back to Julie.