Weon-Gun Ko - Vice President and Treasurer Changyoung Ji - Senior IR Manager.

Pierre Lau - Citibank. Jiyoon Shin - KTB Securities Jae-Hyun Ryu - Daewoo Securities Heedo Yun - Korea Investment & Securities Minho Hur - Shinhan Finance Investment Joseph Jacobelli - Bloomberg Intelligence Josh Bae - UBS Kang Seongjin - KB Investment Securities.

[Foreign Language - Korean] Good morning and good evening. First of all, thank you all for joining this conference call. And now we'll begin the conference of the fiscal year 2015 second quarter earnings results by KEPCO. This conference will start with a presentation, followed by a detailed Q&A session.

[Operator Instructions] Now we shall commence the presentation on the fiscal year 2015 second quarter earnings results by KEPCO..

[Foreign Language - Korean] Good afternoon. This is Weon-Gun Ko, Vice President and Treasurer of KEPCO. On behalf of KEPCO, I would like to thank you all for participating in today's conference call to announce earnings results for the first half of 2015.

[Foreign Language - Korean] We will begin with a brief presentation on the earnings results, which will be followed by a Q&A session. Today's call will be presented in both Korean and English.

[Foreign Language - Korean] Please note that the financial information to be disclosed today is on a preliminary, unaudited and consolidated basis in accordance with K-IFRS. Any comparison would be on a year-on-year basis between 2014 and 2015.

Business strategies, plans, financial estimates and other forward-looking statements included in today's call will be made based on our current expectations and plans. Please be noted that such statements may involve certain risk and uncertainties. [Foreign Language - Korean] Now Senior IR Manager, Mr.

Changyoung Ji, will begin with an overview of earnings results of the first half of 2015, first in Korean and repeat it in English..

[Foreign Language - Korean] Now we will provide the overview in English, starting with operating income. In the first half of 2015, KEPCO recorded a net operating income of KRW 4.33 trillion. Taking a closer look, operating revenues increased 4.1% to KRW 28.79 trillion.

This was attributable mainly to 2.1% increase in power sales revenue totaling KRW 25.89 trillion, and 38.2% increase in revenues from the overseas business amounting to KRW 2.11 trillion. Moving on to main operating costs, cost of goods sold. SG&A expense decreased 4.4% to KRW 24.47 trillion. Fuel costs decreased 25.9% to KRW 7.98 trillion.

Power generation is affected by the low power demand, decreased 4.2%, and unit cost of fuel declined by 22.6%. Meanwhile, purchased power cost increased 3.5 % to KRW 6.19 trillion.

Unit cost of purchased power decreased 20% because of the decrease of S&P, caused by the increase of new highly efficient power plants, and purchased volume increased 29.3%. Depreciation cost rose 5.3% to KRW 3.55 trillion, mainly due to the newly constructed substations and new facility addition by power plants.

Now let me explain KEPCO's non-operating segment. Net financial loss was KRW 1 trillion in the first half of 2015, which was improved by KRW 125 billion. As a result of foregoing, we recorded a consolidated net income of KRW 2.57 trillion in the first half of 2015. This concludes the overview of KEPCO's earnings results for the first half of 2015.

[Foreign Language - Korean] Now let me move on to the Q&A session. Q&A session will be hosted by Mr. Weon-Gun Ko..

[Foreign Language - Korean] This is Weon-Gun Ko. I'm joined with our IR committee members in charge of major business areas at KEPCO. We are prepared to take any questions. [Foreign Language - Korean] Since we are presenting in both Korean and English, all the Q&As will be interpreted. Please make sure your questions and answers are brief and clear.

[Foreign Language - Korean] Please begin..

[Foreign Language - Korean] [Operator Instructions] The first question will be given by Pierre Lau from Citibank. Please go ahead sir..

Hi. Good afternoon, KEPCO management. Congratulations to your good results. I’m Pierre Lau from Citi Bank. I have three questions.

The first question is what is your generation mix from nuclear and coal respectively in 2015 for the full-year? Second question, what is your forecast of your unit coal and LNG costs, practically also in 2015 full-year? And finally for 2015 full-year, how much electricity that you expect to purchase from IPP? Thank you..

[Foreign Language - Korean] To answer your first question on the generation mix for the 2015 full-year, we believe the LNG will be 11% and coal will be 49% and nuclear will be 37%. [Foreign Language - Korean] And as for the unit cost for the fuel for the generation, it is as follows.

For coal, it is KRW 102,001 per ton and for LNG, it’s KRW 827,000 per ton and for oil it’s KRW 576,800. [Foreign Language - Korean] And to answer your third question on our electricity purchase from IPP, we plan to purchase 19% of our power from IPP, and the overall budget in 2015 will be KRW 11 trillion..

Okay. Thank you.

For the unit coal costs, would you mind me take the number?.

[Foreign Language - Korean] It is KRW 102,001 per ton for coal..

Okay. It’s KRW 102,000..

KRW 102,000 per ton..

But I calculate the number in the first half was only seems to be much lower than that, less than KRW 1,001.

So do you expect coal cost to be higher in second half this year compared to first half?.

[Foreign Language - Korean] As of July 1, we are going to be affected by the coal tax by the government. Therefore per kilogram the impact would be KRW 24 from KRW 18 per kilogram..

Okay. Thank you..

[Foreign Language - Korean] The following question is by Jiyoon Shin from KTB Securities. Please go ahead sir..

[Foreign Language - Korean] I have two questions. My first question is rather similar to the previous question that was asked before me. For the LNG unit cost for the first half you mentioned that it’s KRW 810,000, and for the second half of the year your guidance is KRW 660,000.

So throughout the year the overall guidance for LNG unit cost amounts to KRW 820,000. So do you - so it means that there will be foreseeable increase in the second quarter of the year to come up with that guidance number.

Given that we are affected by the consumption tax that will increase from KRW 18 per kilogram to KRW 24, that still get us rather high level of LNG unit cost number. So I would like to hear more on that. Given that the oil price is declining, and in November and December there will be also additional downward trends for the LNG price.

So how would you explain this trend? And the second question is on the overseas business, which has very high revenue generated in the term. I believe it is mostly coming from the UAE business under KEPCO, and in the first quarter it was announced that there has been about KRW 620 billion generated from the UAE business.

And second quarter then gives us - it should be over KRW 1 trillion.

So I just like to confirm what has driven this growth of the UAE business?.

[Foreign Language - Korean] To answer your first question, we had rather conservative assumption when it comes to LNG, which was $62 per barrel. And in the third quarter our forecast that the LNG price would drop to KRW 770,000 per unit and in the fourth quarter then it goes up again to KRW 800,000 per unit.

So the price drop is not happening as fast as we have anticipated and we bought bulk of LNG in the first quarter at a price of KRW 879,000 at the highest and that’s where we had the most purchase of LNG for the year. That’s why if you annualize that, that gives us about KRW 820,000, which was an accumulated number that goes back to the first quarter.

[Foreign Language - Korean] To answer your second question on the UAE business, for the first half of this year, our revenue for the UAE business is KRW 1.7329 trillion and year-on-year - in the previous year it was KRW 1.1372 trillion. So there has been increase of about KRW 600 billion year-on-year.

[Foreign Language - Korean] Our annual guidance for the UAE business is KRW 3.4 trillion. [Foreign Language - Korean] And as you have mentioned for the second quarter alone, our revenue from UAE business is KRW 1.1 trillion. [Foreign Language - Korean] I hope that answered your question..

[Foreign Language - Korean] A follow-up question to my first question is you mentioned that the LNG price is $62 per barrel.

Is that annual number or annual guidance for the LNG price?.

[Foreign Language - Korean] Yes, our guidance for the oil price is $62 per barrel and that’s correct. [Foreign Language - Korean] And because oil price continues to go down, our fact strategy team is revealing to adjust our assumption for the oil price and lower that to $58 per barrel rather than $62..

[Foreign Language - Korean] The following question is by Jae-Hyun Ryu from Daewoo Securities. Please go ahead sir..

[Foreign Language - Korean] On a stand-alone P&L, it seems that your net asset is higher for the stand-alone than the consolidated basis.

What has driven that change and what is the reason behind that in the second quarter? My second question is what is the utilization that you are foreseeing for the second half of the year for the nuclear, coal and LNG valuation? [Foreign Language - Korean] And also another follow-up question is that for the second half of the year, could you also share your guidance and the overall trends by comparing the consolidated financial statement as well as the stand-alone financial statements?.

[Foreign Language - Korean] To answer your first question on the stand-alone P&L. The most of the driver was coming from the sales of the electricity. Unit price for electricity went up by 0.4%, whereas the sales volume went up by 1.4% resulting in increase of KRW 300 billion on our bottom line.

Also the S&P price was dropped by 25% and therefore our power purchase cost was lowered by KRW 2.4 trillion, which is the largest sector driving up the performance.

As for the guidance for the 2015, for the stand-alone P&L, we believe the operating profit to be KRW 3.4 trillion and with recognition of sales of assets which was our own headquarter in September, you could see annual number for the net profit would be KRW 9.1 trillion.

On consolidated basis, our operating profit is expected to be KRW 8.3 trillion, whereas our net profit is expected to be KRW 11.4 trillion. [Foreign Language - Korean] As for the generation utilization, as per the nuclear power plants, E&C overall utilizations would be 84.8% for year 2015, which is similar to the previous year which was at 85%.

With the third quarter and fourth quarter this year, our expectation is that it would be 82.7% and 88.8% respectively. And as for the coal-fired power plant, we expect mid-80% in utilization.

We have a confirmed number for the first half of the year for the coal-fired power plant, but there are certain uncertainties involved for the second half of the number. So that’s our projection for now. For LNG power plant, we expect it to be the early 14% utilization or the mid-30% utilization for the year..

[Foreign Language - Korean] The following question is by Heedo Yun from Korea Investment Securities. Please go ahead sir..

[Foreign Language - Korean] I have two questions. First question, if you look at your consolidated P&L for the second quarter under the line item, other operating profit, it recorded KRW 2.36 trillion and there has been increase of about KRW 670 billion.

I know this may have been influenced by some of the changes coming from the provisioning required for decommissioning the nuclear power plant which took effect since the July 1.

So could you elaborate on what is driving that? And also my second question is that last week you have submitted the total cost or a tariff report to the government to adjust tariff moving forward. So could you share with us the timeline moving forward? And Mr.

Treasurer, would you be kind enough to share with us your perspective on whether it is possible for additional tax decrease?.

[Foreign Language - Korean] Out of the KRW 3.3 trillion, we’ve seen increase of KRW 870 billion increase year-on-year.

And if you break those numbers down, it was slightly driven by increased facility or equipment purchase costs for our UAE business as the business appreciated for significant amount of period, and that number adds up to KRW 410 billion. And also we are adjusting numbers for provisioning for the decommissioning of the nuclear power plant.

We are setting aside the waste disposal costs for the low and intermediate radioactive waste treatment and we are currently adjusting the discount rate and interest rate that is affected in that liability. So that number added about KRW 139.8 billion to the number.

And also we are setting aside liability or provisioning for the IPS, which is another KRW 140 billion, which totals to KRW 3.3 trillion. [Foreign Language - Korean] On your question on the potential tariff discount moving forward, we have had a one-time discount already when it comes to our electricity price.

So in the second half of this year, of course we’re going to adjust our tariff depending on the total cost and also the overall power sales profit. And we have submitted that based on our management accounting in fiscal year 2014. So it has been submitted to the government but nothing has been determined as of this point on the total cost.

When the results come out after government reviews this, we will be adjusting the tariff looking at the overall cost, as well as the overall sales profit from electricity sales, but nothing has been determined yet. But we’ve had this one-time discount of our electricity in July already.

So any additional discount or decrease in tariff will be something that will lead to discuss with the government once everything becomes more concrete..

[Foreign Language - Korean] [Operator Instructions] The following question is from Minho Hur from Shinhan Finance Investment. Please go ahead sir..

[Foreign Language - Korean] So last year there was plan to fix the cost for your fuel disposal but as far as I am aware, it has been just delayed to June of this year, but it seems that that cost still has not been determined yet.

When do you believe that the disposal cost would be clear or ways would be determined and when if it is determined, how much of the cost do you expect?.

[Foreign Language - Korean] So the cost requirement for the nuclear waste disposal has been amended as of June 30 and it will be taken into effect since the second half of this year but in next two years. There hasn’t been any significant changes to the amendment.

However, for the low and intermediate nuclear waste disposal, the cost would be change per barrel and it used to be about KRW 11,930,000 per barrel, but the number is going to be increased by about KRW 200,000. So the overall cost therefore will be increased from current KRW 603.3 billion to KRW 643.7 billion moving forward.

So we believe the cost impact would be somewhere around KRW 250 billion to KRW 300 billion per barrel, per dron [ph] that is for the unit cost for the radioactive - for the low and intermediate radioactive waste..

[Foreign Language - Korean] [Operator Instructions] The following question is by Joseph Jacobelli from Bloomberg Intelligence. Please go ahead sir..

Good afternoon. And thank you very much for the time and this presentation. Couple of quick questions with regards to your debt management going forward. So we’ve seen the level coming down in last couple of quarters.

Do you have any specific targets with regards to either your net debt to equity by 2015 and by 2016, or long-term debt to equity whichever number you feel comfortable with? And the other question is, could you give us a quick update on your nuclear build-out over the next few years? Any more delays or are any plants coming in a little bit more quickly than looks this year?.

[Foreign Language - Korean] On your first question on the debt ratio, our goal or target for the consolidated basis for 2015 is 164% and for 2016 is 149% and for year 2017 is 133%. On a stand-alone basis, our target for 2015 is to lower the debt ratio below 100% level.

[Foreign Language - Korean] As far Shin Wolsong 2, we have gone live as of the July 24 of this year and for Shin Kori #3, our target date for operation is first half of 2016, and for Shin Kori #4 nuclear power plant is targeted to go live by first half of 2017..

[Foreign Language - Korean] The following question is by Josh Bae from UBS. Please go ahead sir..

Yes. Hi. Thank you for the opportunity. I have two questions. First, I think you mentioned consolidated operating profit target of KRW 8.3 trillion for this year. Could you please share with us what the FX and oil price forecasts you’re using for this target? Second question, just to follow-up on the previous question regarding the Shin Kori #4.

I think you were previously expecting this nuclear plant to come online sometime in 2016. Is there a particular reason for the delay to first half of 2017? Thank you..

[Foreign Language - Korean] As for the assumption that we were using for our financial guidance for 2015 is we assume that the electricity sales will grow by 1.8%, whereas the foreign exchange rate against dollar would be KRW 1,121 per dollar, and for oil price we expect it to be $62 per barrel in Dubai price.

And for bituminous coal, our assumption is $75 per ton.

[Foreign Language - Korean] As for your second question on Shin Kori #4, it is being delayed because there has been some incompliance on the technology side that some valves, so some of the components, for example the valves needs to be replaced because it failed to meet the technology qualification.

Therefore the operating date for Shin Kori #4 has been delayed to the first half of 2017 instead of our initial schedule which was July of 2016..

[Foreign Language - Korean] [Operator Instructions] The following question is by Kang Seongjin from KB Investment Securities. Please go ahead sir..

[Foreign Language - Korean] I have a question on the overall power purchase cost. It seems that the power purchase unit cost for your GENCO has gone down significantly in the second quarter.

What is your expectation for the third quarter, and could you also share with us your perspective on the adjustment coefficient when you also explain the unit cost trend you will be followed?.

[Foreign Language - Korean] As far this year if you look at the adjustment coefficient for the GENCOs reflecting on the last year’s number, the S&P price was very high in the first half of the year and very low in the second half of the year. So there has been fluctuation if you look at the whole year.

And I have to score at the overall profit and loss of GENCOs over the period. So what we have decided to do this year is that we are going to split the adjustment coefficient being calculated separately for the first half of the year and the second half of the year.

So what we see as a result is that the S&P is high in the first quarter, therefore the GENCOs profitability appears to be very high in the first quarter, whereas in the second quarter the KEPCO’s profitability appears to be high. We have recalculated the adjustment coefficients at the end of June again.

And in the second half of the year, we believe the fluctuation of the S&P will rather be stable. So in the second half of this year, the coefficients or settlement types - unit types will be high and stable. So all in all, we are going to see stabilized number with higher settlement price..

[Foreign Language - Korean] [Operator Instructions] The following question will be given by Joseph Jacobelli from Bloomberg Intelligence. Please go ahead sir..

Just a quick follow-up question with regards to several coal costs. Given we’ve seen coal prices very low for quite some time and unlikely to get any - go any higher.

Will this price trend of coal influence your decision in terms of future capacity planning or will you just say for example taking 1% coal-fired power plant by - to gas-fired power plant to a coal-fired power plant, or are you trying to secure longer term contracts for coal, or are you trying to diversify some of the coal costs - coal sources? Thank you..

[Foreign Language - Korean] Last month we have announced the seventh basic plan for the electricity supply and demand by the government. And there LNG makes this so much similar.

It has increased by about 0.3% and for coal, we assume that the coal price will go down and its mix would be about 32%, whereas the nuclear power plant we are adding two more nuclear power plants and that will take up about 28.5% in terms of our generation mix.

As for the coal-fired power plant, we have initially planned for adding for a coal-fired power plant in our sixth basic plan for electricity supply and demand but that has been withdrawn.

[Foreign Language - Korean] And as for the GENCOs, they have - when they plan for the purchase of coal, their target is to have 80% of the coal purchased under the long-term contract with their suppliers. So even if there is drop in coal price, they would not necessarily move to diversify their coal purchase sources in East [ph].

The GENCOs are looking into various method and ways to have competitive pricing, sourcing price for their coal..

Thank you..

[Foreign Language - Korean] The following question is by Jae-Hyun Ryu from Daewoo Securities. Please go ahead sir..

[Foreign Language - Korean] I have one short question on dividend payment.

Now that we are wrapping up the first half of the year, has there been any internal discussion on the dividend payout for the end of the year? One potential idea is that because you have the sales of your headquarter assets, are you reviewing to use that fund to include that in your dividend payout? I know it’s rather early to have a view on that, but could you mention or potentially share anything with us?.

[Foreign Language - Korean] On our dividend policy with dividend forecast for 2015, I regret to say that there has not been any concrete measure that has been determined yet. Our intention is to maintain our historical dividend payout ratio which was 30%.

Of course for this year, because of our after-sales we have increased special profit and that may then lead to special dividend, but nothing has been determined yet and we are in the process of discussing that with the government. When we consider the special profit into our dividend policy, then that will significantly drive up our dividend payout.

So our basic stance is to maintain our historical dividend payouts, but that’s something that we are still discussing with the government. But what we are keeping in mind is that we will act on behalf of the investors’ interest and in leading that discussion with the government..

[Foreign Language - Korean] All right. We will conclude this conference call. Once again thank you for joining us today. Thank you..

[Foreign Language - Korean] [Operator Instructions] This concludes the fiscal year 2015 second quarter earnings results by KEPCO. Thanks for the participation..