Robert Dennis - Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Mimi Vaughn - Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer.

Janine Stichter - Jefferies Steven Marotta - CL King and Associates Mitch Kummetz - Pivotal Research Laurent Vasilescu - Macquarie Jonathan Komp - Robert W. Baird Scott Krasik - Buckingham Research Group.

Good day everyone and welcome to the Genesco's Fourth Quarter Fiscal 2018 Conference Call. Just a reminder, today's call is being recorded. Participants on the call expect to make forward-looking statements. These statements reflect the participants' expectations as of today, but actual results could be different.

Genesco refers you to this morning's earnings release and to the Company's SEC filings, including in the most recent 10-Q filing, for some of the factors that could cause differences from the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements made during the call today.

Participants also expect to refer to certain adjusted financial measures during the call. All non-GAAP financial measures referred to in the prepared remarks are reconciled to their GAAP counterparts in the attachments to this morning's press release and in schedules available on the Company's homepage under Investor Relations.

I will now turn the call over to Bob Dennis, Genesco's Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. Please go ahead, sir..

Good morning and thank you for being with us. I'm joined today by our Chief Financial Officer, Mimi Vaughn. Fourth quarter adjusted earnings per share of $2.15 were in line with our expectations towards the lower end of our guidance range and flat with last year. Comps increased 1%.

Tremendous results in Journeys and Johnston & Murphy were offset by difficult comps in Lids, increased promotional activity in the UK, and challenges in our licensed brands business. Fiscal 2018 adjusted earnings per share were $3.13 with flat comps for the year compared with $4.33 in fiscal 2017.

While it was a very challenging year overall, the profit gap to last year improved sequentially each quarter and the gap closed in Q4. In spite of the notable changes in retail, our well-positioned businesses remain undisputed leaders in their categories and we believe they have much more potential than our results reflected this year.

The strength of our concept and compelling assortments have allowed us to largely maintain our topline, but we need to do more to bring those sales to the bottom line.

We have launched a major multiyear initiative to reshape the heavily fixed cost structure of our brick-and-mortar channel and counteract proper dilution of building the e-commerce channel which we will discuss with you today. From a high level, in Q4 our performance was once again defined largely by the divergence in our two biggest businesses.

With its exceptional talent and experience we were confident the Journeys team would deliver strong results as the year proceeded after battling through the fashion rotation in the first half and in its usual pattern Journeys built on the momentum of back-to-school and delivered a remarkable double-digit comp gain for Q4, a meaningful improvement over Q3's positive result.

Cold weather gave a boost to our boot business. We saw a nice improvement in select casual styles and the fashion and classic about [ph] trends which have been driving sales continued to gain momentum. The acceleration was driven by both store and direct comps and both were up double-digits.

Our current assortment, which is now more balanced and diversified across brands than in the previous fashion cycle, is performing above our expectations.

We are enthusiastic about our prospect as the retro athletic and lifestyle athletic trends we have benefited from have proliferated into a greater number of brands and franchises which will provide us the momentum through the year.

This classic fashion lifestyle product plays into the sweet spot of Journeys positioning at the house of fashion routine footwear. And so congratulations to the entire Journeys team for an incredible finish to the year.

And while we will greatly miss Jim Estepa who stepped away from day-to-day leadership at year end he has left Journeys in good hands with Mario Gallione and the rest of the Journeys leadership team.

Shifting to Lids, after significant recovery and profit improvement in fiscal 2017, fiscal 2018 was more difficult than we anticipated due to several specific headwinds that we don't believe will last forever.

While comps began into positive territory they became more difficult and ended the year with a notable decline in Q4 against the strong positive comp the year before due to a confluence of category specific factors we have discussed before.

To start we were lapping the impact of the World Series win a year ago on Cubs sales which into the holiday gift given season. On top of this, sales of NFL licensed merchandise brought down during what is typically a peak selling period. These two factors accounted for a substantial portion of the comp decline in the quarter.

In addition, our NCAA license business was down due to team specific wins and losses. And finally, the absence of a strong headwear trend which began over the summer negatively affected the balance of sales. Notably Lids e-commerce comps continued to be positive in the face of all these headwinds.

Like our other businesses, Lids is subject to fashion cycles and headwear is currently between trends positioned now for the type of strong resurgence that Journeys is now enjoying once a new fashion driver emerges. But we don't know the exact timing of when this will occur. History points to a rebound.

Our long history with Lids Hat stores shows almost a decade and a half of store overall [ph] profit and the teams in 20s which remains the case today demonstrating tremendous resilience and ability to cycle through trends successfully. As you know, we announced a few weeks ago that we are exploring the sale of Lids.

I will talk about the rationale for this decision which we discussed in our press release last month after Mimi discusses the specifics of our results which will add a little time to our call today.

Meanwhile across the Atlantic, after a very strong start to the year, Schuh sales and profitability in Q4 were hampered by weak demand of footwear and apparel which fueled an extremely promotional environment in the UK throughout the holiday selling season.

A strong Black Friday boosted by sale of product pushed Schuh November comps into positive territory as sales gains more than made up for the markdowns.

Importantly, in spite of even more promotional activity comps were pressured in December and January as the consumer had no appetite for full priced product because of the promotional activity margins were pressured as well.

In spite of a slow start to the year, Johnston & Murphy like Journeys had a very strong finish and its results were another highlight of the quarter. J&M had record fourth quarter sales with comp increase and meaningful gross margin expansion. Sales were driven by growth both in footwear and in other categories with casual footwear leading the way.

This marks a noteworthy eighth consecutive year of sales increases for the J&M team and so congratulations to all of you. Finally, licensed brands ended a touch year with a touch quarter given the overall weak demand for men's dress and casual shoes during this strong athletic cycle and a renewed commitment by private label development.

With respect to our outlook, we believe our near-term performance will continue to be shaped by the divergence of two big [ph] businesses Journeys and Lids, although not to the degree that we saw in the fourth quarter and this is what we've experienced in fiscal 2019 thus far in addition to the headwinds of a major late winter snowstorm in the UK which impeded shopping and has limited our visibility in the current trends at Schuh.

While we believe Journeys current product assortment is well positioned to drive continued growth, the near-term uncertainty around the timing of a Lids rebound combined with generally weak store traffic across retail causes us to be cautious about the coming year.

As such, we are projecting adjusted earnings per share to range between $3.05 and $3.45. This guidance includes the impact of Lids as if it were owned by us for the entire year.

This was a wider range than we have given in the past reflecting the many variables in the current retail and licensed sports environment and we do regard our guidance as a range, something close to the middle reflects our best belief of where we might come out with the top end representing more upside and the lower end upper scenario, all of which we see as real possibilities.

Looking ahead, there are clear opportunities and challenges as we begin fiscal 2019 and we are addressing them head on with specific action plan. We remain confident that our footwear businesses represent a solid foundation to support future growth.

At the same time, the ongoing evolution of consumer purchasing behavior requires changes to our operating model. These changes will focus on strengthening our customer connections and fortifying the leadership positions of each business in addition to streamlining our cost structure and capital spend.

We will discuss the specific initiatives to achieve these goals later in the call today, but for now let me turn the call over to Mimi to go over the financials and guidance in greater detail..

Thank you, Bob. Good morning. As usual, we have posted more detailed information in our CFO commentary that you can access online at our website. The strength of Journeys and Johnston & Murphy allowed us to hold Q4 EPS flat to last year in spite of challenges elsewhere in our business.

We've reduced the gap to last year's EPS that began in the first quarter in each subsequent quarter this year and finally closed it in Q4.

While we had a small pickup in EPS from the tax reform benefit in January, the 53rd week in fiscal 2018 was dilutive to earnings since it fell in early February, a period of low sales for us and the impact of these two things netted each other out. Even with positive consolidated comp Q4 EPS was flat.

Due to the expense of the extra week gross margin pressures specific to Schuh and licensed brands and higher e-commerce shipping and other expense. Without the impact of the extra week we were pleased that we generally maintained our overall expense leverage in spite of negative store comps. Q4 consolidated revenue increased 5% to $930 million.

Excluding the extra week, the impact of exchange rates, and the sale of a small business last year revenue was relatively flat. Consolidated comps were up 1% with store comps down 1% and direct comps up 15%.

While store comps were negative in total they were nicely positive for J&M and up double-digits for Journeys on the strength of the assortment and in-store execution.

Direct as a percent of total retail sales in Q4 was 14% up almost 200 basis points for both the quarter and the year, demonstrating the great progress that we have driving e-commerce and pushing e-commerce to over 11% of total retail sales in fiscal 2018. Journeys experienced a very strong acceleration of sales.

Comps grew from positive 4% in Q3 to positive 11% in Q4. The business performed well across every dimension highlighted by year-over-year increases in traffic, in conversion and in average ticket size. This was driven by both boots and higher priced fashion athletic products and both footwear units and ASPs increase.

While year-over-year traffic was better than mall averages it was higher conversion and average ticket size plus strong digital sales that generated Johnston & Murphy's positive 4% comps.

Sales of both footwear and non-footwear were up, but J&M's compelling assortment of footwear led by casual is what drove top line and brought comp from negative in Q3 to positive in Q4. Price increases on select products at retail contributed to the better average ticket size and did not affect conversions.

Fashion athletic footwear drove higher unit sales at Schuh but ASPs were hurt by a higher mix of sales product and lackluster sales of boots in the highly promotional UK environment. Lower traffic, conversion, and ASPs led to a negative store comp for Schuh, but very robust e-commerce sales resulted in a positive overall comp of plus 1%.

Bob described the current issues facing Lids, as a result Q4 store traffic was off double-digits and conversion was down too leading to a negative 14% comp. This is against a strong positive 8% comp last year on the back of the Cubs World Series win which drove higher than usual traffic and sales.

Comp declines were more heavily weighted to Locker Room given its higher concentration in the NFL. On a positive note, dollars per transaction were 5% higher. Q4 consolidated adjusted gross margins decreased 30 basis points to 47%.

Without increased shipping and warehousing costs from higher e-commerce sales, gross margin would have been up 10 basis points. Another bright spot for Lids was a significant 140 basis point pickup in gross margins which contributed meaningfully to this consolidated improvement.

Without the extra shipping and warehousing costs, Lids' gross margin would have been even higher by about 80 basis points. Thanks to improved merchandising practices and systems Lids has been taking markdowns earlier throughout the year with the goal of clearing products sooner and with more shallow [ph] march.

This was especially important with the vendor changeovers in two professional leagues this year. Their results really showed up at year end and were significantly better than we expected and we ended the year in a clean inventory position in spite of the comp trends.

At J&M gross margin was up 100 basis points benefiting from the retail price increases and lower markdowns. Journeys gross margin decreased 10 basis points. Without the extra shipping and warehousing costs it would have been up 30 basis points as a result of lower markdowns and slightly lower IMOs.

Gross margin at Schuh was down 490 basis points, a measure of how difficult the consumer environment was and the level of markdowns required to move product. Finally, weak demand for men's, dress, and casual shoes in the midst of this very strong athletic footwear cycle drove much lower licensed brands gross margins.

These factors also contributed to our decision to terminate the past footwear license agreement and buyout the remaining minimum royalty obligations. Total SG&A expense as a percent of sales increased 50 basis points to 40.2% with the leverage on rents, selling salaries, and potential [ph] expenses due to the extra cost of this 53rd week.

Without this our expense leverage would have been roughly flat in Q4. Digital and other marketing spends to stimulate sales and drive traffic to our sites and stores and IT spends to build omnichannel capabilities were higher in the quarter as well.

We have talked about pressure from minimum wage and competitor wage increases and we saw this continued impact on wage rate in both Journeys and Lids this quarter with a mid single digit increase. Q4's net result was adjusted operating income of $62.8 million versus $66.7 million last year. Adjusted operating margin decreased 80 basis points to 6.8%.

Journeys and J&M OI was up for the quarter and the other businesses were down. Turning now to the balance sheet, inventory is clean. Q4 total inventory was down 4% on a sales increase of 1% adjusting for the extra week but not adjusting for foreign exchange. Journeys inventory was down 4% on a sales increase of 11%.

Lids' inventory was down 8% on a sales decrease of 17% as Lids carried some product over into the new year rather than market down to re-buy it again later. Capital expenditures were $24 million for the quarter and for the year were higher than usual due to the Journeys distribution center expansion and depreciation and amortization was $21 million.

We did not repurchase shares during the quarter and we have $24 million remaining under the current $100 million repurchase authorizations. We had expected to end the year with U.S. borrowings due to the Journeys DC project and higher working capital needs from timing of the 53rd week.

However, we tightened up both capital spending and working capital and ended the year with about $40 million less in borrowing [indiscernible]. Turning now to guidance for fiscal 2019, we estimate adjusted earnings per share to range from $3.05 to $3.45. As Bob indicated, this wider than usual range is largely because of two potential variables.

The first is whether the decline in mall traffic and sales shift out of stores and into digital that has been dilutive to earnings will continue at the pace we saw last year, store comp underlying our guidance range from roughly flat to down 2%. The second is the timing of the Lids rebound.

We anticipate a tough first half for Lids until we anniversary the start of more challenging comps in the summer and since we don't yet have visibility into a new fashion driver we remain conservative for the back half as well in spite of the much easier comparisons.

For the year we expect consolidated sales will range from down 1% to up 1% with consolidated comps including direct ranging from flat to up 2%. We plan to open 55 new stores and each for Journeys Kidz, Schuh in the UK and our Concept in Canada.

The balance of the stores will mostly be fill-ins for our more mature concepts in strong malls where we haven't previously been able to get the right rent deal.

Some have suggested that we shouldn’t be opening any new store, but our analysis of recent store openings suggest we are earning on average above our cost to capital, so we will continue to pursue these openings selectively. We plan to close almost 100 stores for a square footage decrease for the second year in a row.

However, we will keep a store open with short lease term if the rent deal is attractive, so this number may change. The stores that we open will be far more productive than the ones that we close as you saw this year as we selectively prune the unproductive stores from our portfolio.

We expect gross margin to be up 20 to 30 basis points in total in the coming year with the improvement in most divisions. With the low store comp and our largely fixed store expense base we expect SG&A expenses will de-lever in the 30 to 50 basis point range which with the cost savings I will discuss is a meaningful improvement over last year.

In addition, we will be investing in store labor as Bob will complain which these savings will also help offset. This all results in an operating margin percent at or few cents below last year's level an EPS that ranges from down a little to up double-digits.

Our fiscal 2019 tax rate is estimated at 26.8% inclusive of the benefit of tax reform and subject to refinement as the details of this reform are worked out. One important callout for modeling quarterly guidance in fiscal 2019 is the shift in the calendar as a result of this 53rd week last year.

While this impacts all quarters somewhat, the biggest change is the shift of one of the largest volume back-to-school week at the beginning of August out of the third quarter and into the second which will help earnings in Q2 and hurt the in Q3.

Another callout relates to pressure on Q1 EPS given the low comp and deleverage we expect in a low sales quarter making it difficult to have positive EPS spend.

Capital expenditures will be in the neighborhood of $75 million down substantially from last year and the previous five years when we have been investing in upgrading our distribution facilities. We plan to spend a greater proportion of capital on digital while still investing to refresh our store fleet.

We estimate depreciation and amortization at $78 million. Lastly, we are assuming $19.5 million average shares outstanding. This guidance assumes no stock buyback, but we can use repurchase availability opportunistically going forward.

We are working toward a tenth of a turn improvement in inventory to turns which should help cash flow for the year as well.

Shifting to the critical initiatives we have underway for fiscal 2019 we recognize the added cost of operating two channels and driving traffic to the stores dilute profitability and that we must reduce the store cost structure and improve efficiency in e-commerce to combat this.

Over the last several months we have carefully examined our expanse base and launched a profit enhancement initiative to take out $35 million to $40 million of annual expense. This cost reduction program is a key priority in every one of our businesses.

We've talked about this happening with renewals and rent reductions, partnering with our landlords to achieve expectable rents while often increasing flexibility and reducing risk with shorter-term. This is a huge focus for us and is a critical part of this program.

To give an update, we negotiated almost 300 renewals last year and achieved in total a 16% reduction in cash rents or 9% on a straight line basis. With over 350 expected renewals this year we will keep working at this. We also renegotiated our freight carrier contract which went into effect in the fourth quarter and is already yielding benefits.

This overall program is broad reaching and includes headcount reductions we have already made, additional opportunities in stores like credit card fees, store network costs and store supplies, opportunities and benefits in IT fees and beyond.

This is the start of a multiyear effort to reshape our store cost structure and allow for continued investment in e-commerce and digital. Now, I'll turn the call back over to Bob to comment on the other key initiatives we are working on..

With Mimi already providing the update on our work to reduce real estate risk and rent expense as well as a broader cost savings program and our plans to reduce capital spending, I'm going to focus on the four other key initiatives to evolve our businesses and strengthen our strategic positioning for the longer term.

And much of this builds on our efforts from last year with one new area of focus. So first, we're working to improve the customer experience in all channels and to gain a single view of the customer.

To be able to enhance the experience we must understand better each customer's learning and the different ways they interact with our brands in both the digital and physical worlds. Johnston & Murphy is leading Genesco in building these capabilities which is also a major focus for Journeys and Lids this year.

We added this to our top priorities with the believe that by continuing to improve the customer experience we will build loyalty and better maximize each customers value to us as a result. For Journeys it is the three-pronged approach.

First, we are tackling the sources of which the net customers encounter during the omnichannel and interactions with us. This approach identifies all the major pain point in stores and online such as order knockdown when tracking with the intent of bringing process and technology solutions to solve them.

Next Journeys is looking to build a single view of the customer from multiple internal and external data sources and this includes gathering transactional, behavioral, and demographic information such as past purchases, shipping preferences, social preferences, promotional history, gender and location that reside our various systems and consolidating it into a unified view of the customer across Journeys.

And lastly, Journeys will use this data combined with other customer insights to better understand and solve our customers' footwear needs, increase conversion, and average order value and resolve problems more effectively.

For Lids, establishing these capabilities begins with enhancing the robustness of customer data platform which would enable them to embark on this year. Number two, we are working to enhance our in-store experience and drive traffic to our brick-and-mortar locations.

We view our stores as strategic assets and critically important to delivering the omnichannel experience. We've talked a lot about driving traffic on prior call, so I will focus on the store experience this time. Two most important aspects of this are our store employees and our store environment.

We continue to invest in both to ensure that we provided a compelling and differentiated experience for the millions of customers who cross our lease lines every year.

In fiscal 2019 we are increasing our investments in our store employees with a particular focus in Journeys on our co-managers the second most critical position after the store manager in order to fortify our store leadership teams.

We are also conducting surveys and dedicating time and resources to better understand opportunities to build engagement with our store employees. Finally, we will be testing a few new bonus programs to keep store employees engaged and motivated and reduce turnover.

In terms of our physical presence, we will continue to invest in enhancing our store fleet especially in high volume, high profit, positive trends locations, with close to 200 models planned for the coming year.

When a customer enters our store we want them to be in an environment that is inspiring and showcases our product assortment in a compelling manner. The majority of our spend will be directed towards evolving our current concepts with an emphasis on lighting and display modification.

And beyond this, as we discussed previously, Lids is testing a new store design.

The updated look and feel features cleaner product presentations, narrower assortments with more of a showcase orientation, and a larger emphasis on interactive experiences such as customer embroidery which is a real differentiator and we are pleased with the early results of the test.

Number three, we are building our omnichannel and digital capabilities with initiatives across all of our companies. This year we will test mobile point-of-sale technology in select U.S.

footwear stores in addition to speeding up and making the check out process even more convenient, mobile POS gives our associates an added opportunity to engage with customers on the sales floor and potentially sell them other merchandise they may need. Schuh already enjoys this capability.

Schuh is also reaping the benefits of a new web platform launched late last year that is faster and offers quite a bit more functionality and plan to further refresh up its website this year. Meanwhile, J&M is testing two initiatives we are very excited about. First is online to off line attribution.

Here we're working to improve our understanding of what digital marketing tactic are most impactful store conversions. We currently touch about 20% of the consumers who transacted in J&M stores with some form of a digital marketing impression, email, page search, digital ads, social, seven days prior to purchase.

We would like to become even more intentional with those impressions to see if we can drive higher traffic and conversion in our stores. Next we are testing predictive technologies using artificial intelligence.

This takes customers' previous browsing behavior and purchase history as well as what other similar customers have bought in the past to show each customer a different arrangement of merchandise on the product listing page. The goal is to increase conversion and average order value by showing products that appeals most to an individual customer.

For Lids, the implementing of a new order management system that brought us closer to complete buy online, pick up in-store capabilities gave us visibility into an increase in customers electing to actually come into the store for immediate pickup instead of having the product shipped to them.

This reinforces the need it now mindset common in this category and shows the willingness of many customers to make the trip to the store to get it. This is the capability we continue to evaluate for our divisions that have not yet offered it. And number four, we are working to strengthen the equity of our retail brands.

We are looking to build on the momentum of our marketing investments generated during the holiday season with a host of compelling programs throughout this year.

This spring Journeys is partnering with Converse on a national prom promotion in celebration of this quintessential teen moment with a twist that will culminate in an ultimate prom for one lucky city.

Little Burgundy will leverage its 10th anniversary celebration with marketing events that promote the brand and reinforce the concepts of authentic positioning with its core customers.

At Lids, the focus is on enhancing act as passed, the new loyalty program launched last year to drive increased engagement brand followership and ultimate in incremental sales. Now shifting gears a bit, as you know, we announced a few weeks ago that we are exploring the sale of the Lids sports group.

This decision came out of the most recent of a thorough and comprehensive strategic review that Management and the Board have conducted annually for several years now.

On the basis of the most recent analysis, which was completed in the fall last year and prepared - with the assistance of outside financial advisors, the board looked at the range of strategic possibilities and concluded that a sale of Lids makes more sense for Genesco to deliver enhanced value for our shareholders over the long term.

As we addressed in our press release last month, the primary reason for the Board's conclusion is the great potential in each of our footwear businesses and in a Genesco that is focused more sharply on realizing that potential. Individually the components of a footwear focused Genesco are compelling.

Our strong strategic positioning, both connection with our customers and enduring leadership positions are what make each of our footwear this distinctive. Combined the footwear businesses are even more compelling.

We also believe that a company focused solely on footwear would be easier for investors to understand and therefore easier for the market to value appropriately. Journeys is the leading omnichannel retailer of branded fashion footwear for teens in North America, a position that is held for two plus decades.

As its strong sales in the fourth quarter once again demonstrate Journeys understanding of teens and unrivaled access to merchandise this customer want, equip it uniquely well to serve this fickle customer and navigate the fashion steps that are inherently part of live in this segment of the market.

Likewise, Schuh has a similar leadership positions telling fashion footwear not only to the teen but also to the young adult shopper in the U.K. What further differentiates Schuh and engenders allegiance from its customers are advanced omnichannel capabilities and equally passionate focus on customer service.

We've already talked about the long running record of stellar performance that Johnston & Murphy has posted over the last decade. J&M's leadership position is founded on a brand equity that has taken more than 165 years and 30 Presidents to create.

This heritage and its ability to interpret its customers' ever evolving fashion need into a product offering that resonates season after season is what maintains Johnston & Murphy’s preeminent positioning. Johnston & Murphy also based footwear focused Genesco with one of its most promising platforms for future growth.

This platform is built to allow sales direct to consumers through both brick-and-mortar and e-commerce complemented by a vibrant wholesale business and the opportunity to add additional vertical brands that can plug into this infrastructure and control their own destinies in today's retail landscape where brands increasingly go direct to consumers.

Together the footwear businesses are even more compelling. Since Journeys and Schuh enjoy a significant overlap in their vendor base their combined scale allows for a stronger relationship with vendors, that is demonstrated in activities such as top to top global summits held jointly to step marketing and product direct.

Their combined scale allows for lever in merchandise cost and purchase terms and an access to both hot and unique products such as special make-ups of certain franchisers carried only in Journeys and Schuh.

Additionally, the sharing of best practices between these two related businesses provides great benefits in both directions, as their functional heads pair up regularly to compare KPIs and exchange what is working best within their respective businesses.

And finally, these businesses provide a platform and infrastructure to plug in other branded businesses in North America and potentially in Europe as we did with the purchase of Little Burgundy from the Aldo Group two years ago.

One of the areas of most significant benefit across all our footwear concept is the ability to detect then interpret fashion trends, that worked in one area of our business and then spread to others whether trends start in Europe and then come to America or vice versa, whether trends start in the young adult market and spread to teens, these markets and spread to older customer groups to start with older demographics and go younger.

The ability of our merchant and product group to go to market together and this image [ph] and insight is a source of real advantage. While Journeys and Johnston & Murphy may look separate and distinct from the outside, they share almost all of their retail systems and services providing significant cost synergies.

From point of sale to merchandizing systems, loss prevention to help desk, real estate to lease management, the retail infrastructure of these two concepts is completely integrated. Likewise the wholesale infrastructure of Johnston & Murphy and the licensed brands group are completely integrated as well.

Focusing on further enhancing these synergies would be an important future step in the profit improvement initiatives Mimi described earlier in the call. Regarding Lids itself, as you can understand, it would not be appropriate for us to comment further on the ongoing process on today’s call.

We also will not be addressing questions pertaining to the process during the Q&A period today. So I would like to close on this topic by reiterating that we are believers in Lids strategic positioning and that its unrivalled breadth of on-trend and exclusive product makes Lids a go to destination for in-demand fashion and brand headwear.

Lids Sports Group is the leading omnichannel retailer of licensed sports merchandize by far with very strong leadership in place and a talented organization behind them.

However, we believe Lids Sports Group has been undervalued as part of Genesco and that its sale would unlock value and provide us the capital either to support the growth of our leading footwear platform and/or return to shareholders whatever the best net use might be.

We do see great fundamental value in Lids and won't go forward with a sale unless that value can be realized in a transaction. Let me conclude by recognizing the entire Genesco team once again for your dedication and talent. In a year full of market challenges and external distractions, you have remained remarkably focused on the task at hand.

We have a lot of hard work ahead of us, but I am confident that with continued focus, ingenuity and perseverance, given the tremendous potential in our businesses and the extraordinary strength of our people behind them, we will meet the tests retail is presenting us and look back a year from now with pride in what we accomplished together and so thanks for all that you do.

And with that, operator we are ready to take questions..

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And our first question we’ll hear from Erinn Murphy with Piper Jaffray..

Hi guys, this is Eric on for Erinn this morning. Thanks for taking the question.

I guess first, just regarding Lids, I know you don’t have visibility yet into a potential inflection, but can you remind us historically how those kind of play out in terms of timing from when you start to see a trend happening before you can move into it and become – and it becomes material enough to sort of alter the trajectory of the business? And then secondly on Lids, it’s the improvement year-to-date you guys are seeing more reflection of just the NFL business being a smaller piece in this period, has that in trajectory with the NFL sort of change year-to-date from what it was during the second half of last year? Thanks..

So let's go backwards on your historical question. When we evaluate what went on with Lids, we can isolate a lot of the comp decline specifically to first the Cubs, then the decline in the NFL category and then thirdly, the lack of a fashion driver in the headwear business.

And so, you're correct, when you get into the first quarter it begins with the Superbowl and then the NFL is done. So that trajectory is not as anywhere near as a factor that it was in the fourth quarter.

So looking at headwear trends, we've had a dozen headwear trends that have recurred over the last 10 or 15 years and they come and go and they occasionally overlap. We're just in a trough right now and it's a little hard to generalize when they show up, some are prompted by an event probably wearing something that all of a sudden catches fire.

Some of them emerge as what looks to be more of a fashion pump like Snapbacks got really hot and then we figured that would be a fad and that would go away and Snapbacks actually persisted for years and in fact it's become a permanent part of our store. So lot of different ways to look at it.

We just are in a bit of a trough right now and so it's a little hard to be predictive about when it would happen and what it would look like, but we just rely on 20 years of history that does something generally comes along. Specifically with the NFL, we have no crystal ball. There was a lot of things going on in the last season.

A lot of players were hurt, sort of a black lawn event, with how many top players were down, some of the important teams were not there. And so in our guidance we planned it up lightly, but given how the trend was last year that probably leaves some room for greater upside given how tough it was then..

Yes, one of the other things I would say is that the lead time to get product in the headwear space is shorter than in footwear. I mean, footwear is, as you can appreciate the construction, some of the last being able to get that product here we've talked in the past about that that lead time being six plus months.

The headwear lead time we can actually chase into a fad and into a trend much more quickly. And so, in the past when we've seen things like Snapback come into play, we have been able to really grow our assortments more rapidly than we can on the footwear side..

And next we move onto Janine Stichter with Jefferies..

Hi, good morning. Just wanted to get some color on the comp guidance for Journeys, you saw an acceleration there in the fourth quarter and it seems like trends even got better in January, but there is significant acceleration in that the first quarter guidance.

So is there anything specific you are seeing there driving that acceleration? And then kind of along the same lines on the current trends, it seems like it seems like it falls really right in your sweet spot, but we are seeing trends come and go quicker than past, so what is your expectations in the current cycle, is there anything you are doing differently in how you manage the business just like you are prepared when the trends ultimately do change again? Thank you..

In general, let me talk to a couple of the comments. As we said in the script, what we really like about where we are right now is there is more diversification amongst brands and franchises, all sort of playing off both the Classic and then the lifestyle athletic which are in Journeys sweet spot and we think that we get a good long run out of that.

So with respect to the fashion cycle, the same question got put to Foot Locker last week on their call and our answer is pretty much the same. Our business is largely dependent on branded merchandise and as Mimi just noted what the lead times are, those lead times are still pretty much what they’ve been.

Our vendors are working pretty hard to figure out other ways to shorten up that timeline and we're certainly there to help and do whatever we can.

What we're doing in terms of playing defense against the possibility that there is a quicker pattern is just being more diversified in the store and so that we're showing a range of opportunities to our customers. And that we believe that allows us to jump on whatever get spot a little more quickly.

In terms of the general guidance Mimi let me turn it to you..

So, Janine I think that it's important to look back to last year. Last year we were really trying to move and move our inventory so that we could change our assortment and as a result, we had - we cleared a lot of product in order to bring in a very large shipment in January to accelerate the fashion rotation.

And so when you look at our plus 11% comp in the fourth quarter, that is against an easier comparison in the fourth quarter given everything that was going on. We have a lot of confidence in the Journeys business.

There were a lot of great things that happened in the fourth quarter that we felt like it would be prudent to moderate that that look into the first part of the year because the factors were a little different than they were in the fourth quarter.

And so, you can appreciate that during the peak time holiday selling periods we are able to, we are able to really drive Journeys volume. We have seen a moderation in that plus 11% comp that we think that we are tracking nicely to the 3% to 4% guidance that we have in the first half of the year..

Yes, just to finish up on this topic, one of the challenges for us is with this last fashion change that was kind of painful for us. Thankfully the team did a great job of navigating through it, but the navigation period was tough.

We did some forensic work, if you will, what could you have been predictive about this change, and when you go back and use Google Trends or anything that would, you would regard as predictive resource, nothing really seemed to call the charts very effectively.

And that's because if you ask a teenager right now what they think they're going to be wearing in six to nine months, they might tell you what they think it is, but it is a very fickle customer and the truth is they don't know.

And so, our challenge is to try and do some of the things we were referencing on the call, touch our European exposure, touch the fact that we are a national footprint retailer so we see what's going on on the coast that might move to the middle of the country and I think we're positioned to do as good a job as anybody in being predictive of what's going on.

With that said, it is a challenge for this category..

And next we'll move on to Steve Marotta with CL King and Associates..

Good morning Bob and Mimi.

A couple of quick questions, as it pertains, the [indiscernible] CapEx is played at $75 million this year, could you impact that a little bit between technology investment, store refreshes and I guess a few openings and other items? And also my follow up is that historically the profitability tradeoff in incremental sales between offline and online, online obviously the incremental profitability was higher, offline incremental probability was lower because the variable costs associated with it.

Does the new cost reduction program address that differential and perhaps make the incremental profitability for online a bit greater in future years?.

You know Steve, we always managed to confuse you guys enormously about online and offline sales. We are profitable online and profitable offline to the same degree. The distinction is that how profitable are we on an incremental scale.

And so offline when you're in a store and if you pick up 5% more sales that 5% on an incremental basis is very profitable because you've already paid the rent and you generally can service 5% more with your existing staff.

When you get 5% increase online you get an increase in your expenses of picking and packing and shipping and so you're adding variable costs. But that doesn't mean one is more profitable than the other in an absolute sense.

It means on the increment it's more possible, what happens is we're delighted to get more sales online because those are profitable sales, you just don't get the kind of leverage with more sales, because it's a variable cost business.

And then if the shift is such that we get increases than online and we actually are flat or negative in our stores, then you're getting the deleverage of the fixed costs and that's the issue.

And so when we go looking at cost, first of all everything is on the table, so there is not a line item that we're not going to take a look at, but the big opportunity is to figure out how to continue to get the store cost in line and obviously the number one item in that area is rent. So I hope that clears up that question.

Let me pass it to Mimi on the CapEx..

Yes, I'm going to just pile on to the question about profitability and so our whole profit improvement program is exactly as Bob said it's focused on both the store channel and the e-commerce channel, but when you look at our store channel outside of product costs outside of merchandise costs, the rent expense, selling salary expense, and depreciation, all add up to about 80% of the cost base.

And so to really make an impact in a world where we've had negative store comps and we've had negative store comps for a number of quarters, we have to be able to reshape those factors.

We have set aside selling salaries, we've made a lot of progress on selling salaries by substituting part time labor to full time labor by optimizing using shopper track, but with the headwinds of minimum wage pressure and wage rate increases that we've been seeing, we don't have a lot of optimism for being able to reverse the increases that we've being in-store selling salaries.

And so we're really working hard on rent and then our cost reduction program will be focused on many of the other pieces of the store cost structure. And it’s the reshaping of the store cost structure that is one of the primary motivations in our cost improvement programs.

So when you look at capital expenditures and looking at the $75 million, we have been investing in upgrades to all of our major distribution centers to accommodate e-commerce and also just accommodate the growth of our businesses over the last several years.

And so, some of the decrease in CapEx comes from not having to make some of those investments, it also comes from reducing the number of new store openings. We're estimating that we'll be opening 55 new stores this year versus 75 last year and 80 the year before. So, some of the reduction comes from not as many new store openings.

We're still investing heavily in e-commerce and IT that represents in the neighborhood of a third of our overall capital spends. The balance is on renovations. Our belief is it's important to continue to refresh our overall our store portfolio and so we have dollars put in there for almost 200 renovations.

We are spending a little bit less trying to really focus on those elements that will highlight the product, like lighting, things like that play and really making the customer feel like we have been keeping pace with and refreshing our overall fleet..

And next we'll move on to Mitch Kummetz with Pivotal Research. Q - Mitch Kummetz Yes, thanks. I just want to start, I want to ask you this question maybe in a little bit different way about channel mix. So this past year you guys were flat comp, it's minus 2 stores, I think plus 22 direct.

Your comp guide for 2019 is flat to plus 2, I mean are you looking for sort of a similar kind of mix in terms of the store performance or the direct performance of ‘19 versus ’18 and if that were to happen then like so what is the impact then on the margins with that kind of a mix? And I have a follow up..

I'll let Mimi give you on the guidance breakdown specifically, but what we're doing now is being more aggressive than we've been in terms of what we need to see in terms of our rent structure in order to renew our stores.

We've been quoting a lot of the success that we've had mentioned with rents, but kind of you remember, you do your rent renegotiations ahead of the renewals, so a lot of times we've renewed stuff this year and the new rent structure kicks in next year.

So a large part of how we work this problem is really hammering on rents to make sure that we have a viable economic formula in the stores even with those comp numbers..

Yes, so Mitch just to compare to last year, so that's right, our store comps were down 2% last year and e-commerce comps were up 22%. And so this year we have on average seen in the neighborhood of 15% growth rate on average for e-comp. Last year it’s bumped up.

We are anticipating it will be somewhat in the range of what we've seen on average, so going back to sort of that 15% range.

On stores, so over the past several quarters, I think it's been seven or eight quarters, we have seen pressure in our stores and negative store comps and at that negative 2% store comp in fiscal ‘18 last year we deleveraged to the tune of about 90 basis points.

That high fixed expense base that I talked about, whenever we don't get traffic, whenever we aren’t able to convert in our stores, we tend to deleverage. The other side of that is really positive that when we do get, when we are able to convert and we do are able to drive comp store sales, we see lots of nice leverage on fixed expense base.

And so, for this year and thinking about guidance and reflecting the trends that we've seen, our store comp is at the high end of our range is flat, at the low end of our range is in the neighborhood minus 2% that we saw last year.

Now the positive news as far as the impact on our cost reduction program is that last year when we saw 90 basis points of deleverage, this year at a minus 2% comp, we expect that we will see 50 basis points of deleverage.

And so as we work at reshaping the cost, as we work at beating down rents as Bob mentioned, over time we're able to leverage in our stores at a much lower comp rate.

And so for this year, I think it's going to be somewhere between 2% as we continue to bring rents down, we ought to be able to leverage at a lower level of store comps, and then when store comps become positive driven by rents, driven by pick-ups from competitor fallouts and we will be in a situation where we see very nice store economics..

We'll next move onto Laurent Vasilescu with Macquarie..

Good morning, thanks for taking my question. I wanted to follow up on the earlier question regarding the Journeys first quarter comp guidance.

I think the comp guidance is 3% to 4% on a two-year stack basis suggests some decelerations, are the recent winter storms, maybe tax returns or any other factors influencing that comp guidance?.

Yes, I think that again we feel very positive about the assortment for Journeys for the coming year. The winter storms certainly have been a factor, but we tend to think that those are fleeting and that they don’t impact the trend for the quarter.

And so, when we look to see what the assortment is for spring, it is as we talked it’s diversified across the number of brands and the key for [indiscernible] positive store comps and we’ve seen nice positive store comps in Journeys as Journeys has come out of the fashion rotation.

And I think that what you're seeing is the measure of conservatism to see how the first part of the year unfolds as far as the overall traffic and store comps for Journeys..

Yes, I'll just reiterate that, when we look at winter storms, they're very disruptive for the business but we're not sure that it actually hurts the business over the course of a quarter.

The pace of tax refunds has been a little perplexing to us because the generalized data has shown that the tax refunds are kind of in the same ballpark as the pace last year. But we think the big driver is the subcategory of the earned income credit and so we're not sure we got complete visibility on that.

We should be reaching the end of the tax period right now. The other factor that kicked in for Journeys which always gets in the way of visibility this time of the year is the timing of spring break. And so when the kids are out of school, we get a balance and so spring breaks are all over the board.

So it’s just - it’s a little tricky in the first quarter. It's a low volume quarter and then you have all these variables that ricochet around. So I would put emphasis on the fact that it's a low volume quarter. What really matters is what we expect to see in quarters two and especially three and four..

Next we will move on to Jonathan Komp with Robert W. Baird..

Yes, hi thank you.

Couple of broader topics and Bob my first one is on the in essence to pursue the sale of Lids and I understand and agree you are not going to give updates on the process, but I was hoping just more behind the rationale you could expand a little bit just on the surface, the comps are under significant pressure and the profitability is back to very low levels.

So can you give more comfort why right now is the right time to pursue those actions?.

Look, we think that this is a business that in the long run and up being a winner, there will be a retail brick-and-mortar presence in the licensed sports business and Lids is the biggest player there. They’ve got the scale in which to do omnichannel correctly which none of the regional guys have done. We’re seeing regional consolidation already.

There is a business called Fans [ph] that a regional thing that just got sold. It looks like it got sold a bit on a distressed basis and some of those stores are closing, we just think that's a sign of things to come. We think the team is great, the leadership team is great.

We have a number of reasons why we think now is good timing, even though as you know the performance in the last year wasn’t terrific, but I'm going to leave it at that..

And next we will move onto Scott Krasik with Buckingham Research Group..

Hey guys, thanks and can I try and sneak a few in here.

Mimi, I know you will get it in the K, but can you just tell us what your occupancy for this year should be up or down year-over-year and then in FY ’19 as well just because of the timing when the renewal phase and what not?.

Scott, I think occupancy so with the puts and takes, so the way to think about overall occupancy expenses that we have opened some new stores, we've closed a number of stores and then we're rolling in the impact of these rents decreases. So I would anticipate that for fiscal ’18 that occupancy wouldn't be that different than the year before.

For fiscal ’19 it might be up a little bit just because we've opened some new stores and we haven't yet seen the – we haven't yet seen the full impact of all of these rent decreases. For fiscal ’19, we actually believe that rent will go backwards, so we see rents certainly as a percentage of sales, but also just in total dollars going backward..

And Scott, rent is a tricky thing in small box retailing. We live with much higher percent rent in a high volume store than we do in a low volume store. So I can make more money in a million dollar Journeys store at I don't know make up a number 17% than I can in a $500,000 Journeys store at 15%.

So I might choose to close the $500 million store which was at 15. Keep the store at $1 million at ’17 that increases might rent as a percentage of stales when you add them up, but I'm more profitable because the $1 million store is leveraging all the other expenses much more effectively. So I wouldn't focus too much on the rent per spend.

I would really focus on how well we're managing the total fleet. And as I said it’s just - the math is just a little more complicated than just simply looking at the percent, so I’m just giving you that that's all..

And that will conclude today's question-and-answer session. At this time, I would like to turn the call over to Bob Dennis for any additional or closing remarks..

Well, thank you all for joining us and we look forward to updating you in three months on how it's going. Have a good day..

And that will conclude today's call. We thank you for your participation..