Good morning, and welcome to the CubeSmart Third Quarter 2020 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions]. Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Josh Schutzer, Senior Director of Finance. Please go ahead..

Thank you. Hello, everyone. Good morning from Malvern, Pennsylvania. Welcome to CubeSmart's Third Quarter 2020 Earnings Call. Participants on today's call include Chris Marr, President and Chief Executive Officer; and Tim Martin, Chief Financial Officer. Our prepared remarks will be followed by a Q&A session.

In addition to our earnings release, which was issued yesterday evening, supplemental operating and financial data is available under the Investor Relations section of the company's website at www.cubesmart.com.

The company's remarks will include certain forward-looking statements regarding earnings and strategy that involve risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements.

The risks and factors that could cause our results to differ materially from forward-looking statements are provided in documents the company furnishes to or files with the Securities and Exchange Commission, specifically the Form 8-K we filed this morning, together with our earnings release filed with the Form 8-K and the Risk Factors section of the company's annual report on Form 10-K.

In addition, the company's remarks include reference to non-GAAP measures. A reconciliation between GAAP and non-GAAP measures can be found in the third quarter financial supplement posted on the company's website at www.cubesmart.com. I will now turn the call over to Chris..

Thanks, Josh, and good morning, everyone. The self-storage industry provides a convenient and efficient solution to a wide range of our customers' requirements, and as such, has proven yet again to be an exceptionally resilient business.

At CubeSmart, coming off significant pandemic-related challenges in the second quarter, our best-in-class portfolio demonstrated the strong recovery in the third quarter. And that positive momentum continues into November.

Our physical occupancy remains at record-highs with the same-store occupancy gap to last year expanding and ending October at a positive 211 basis points. Demand from high-quality customers remains extremely solid and our average length of stay continues to elongate.

Strong consumer demand, lower vacates and elevated occupancies are being reflected in gains in year-over-year average offered net effective rates. The percentage rate gap expansion to last year continued building throughout the third quarter.

Across our major markets as we end October, the percentage gap to last year ranges from the low-teens to the mid-20s. Our New York portfolio had a very solid quarter, posting occupancy and revenue growth above our overall same-store average. And that strength has accelerated into the fourth quarter.

Strong demand trends have helped accelerate the lease-up of recently opened stores in many markets, helping to stabilize the operating environment. The supply outlook continues to gradually slow as the number of properties in the pipeline declines. After a pause, our investment activity also picked up steam during the quarter.

In addition to our previously announced agreement to acquire 8 of the highest-quality stores in Brooklyn, the Bronx and Queens from Storage Deluxe, we also noted in our earnings release, that we have 9 additional properties located in Florida, in Long Island, Nevada and Texas under contract. And we expect to close by year-end.

We continue to be pleased with the positive impact our technology initiatives are having on our operating results. On average, approximately 30% of our rentals are coming through SmartRental, our quick, convenient, contact-free rental system.

We introduced our CubeSmart mobile app during the quarter, an industry-leading tool that provides our customers the ability to access their gate codes, pay their bills, manage their settings and receive important notifications all in the palm of their hands. In summary, the self-storage industry continues to demonstrate its resilience.

At CubeSmart, we are proud to be able to offer innovative solutions that serve our customers in the manner they find most comfortable. My continued thanks and appreciation to our over 3,000 teammates who strive to provide those innovative customer solutions with a spirit of genuine care.

With that, I will turn the call over to Tim Martin, our Chief Financial Officer, for his comments.

Tim?.

Thanks, Chris, and thank you to everyone on the call for your continued interest and support. Picking up on Chris' comments, operating fundamentals in the self-storage sector had rebounded and rebounded in a pretty big way. Demand for our product is strong as evidenced by historically high levels of physical occupancy and solid pricing power.

Overall, for the quarter, we reported FFO per share of $0.44, same-store revenue growth of 0.1%, same-store expense growth of 4.2% and same-store NOI growth of negative 1.6%. And there are some encouraging trend lines in those numbers.

Same-store revenue growth for our portfolio was 1.7% in the pre-COVID first quarter of the year, followed by a 2.2% decline in the most heavily COVID-impacted second quarter.

So our 0.1% growth in the third quarter, the 230 basis point improvement sequentially, driven by our ability to largely resume normal operating practices in areas like lean sales and existing customer rate increases throughout the quarter, combined with a considerably stronger consumer demand on a seasonal basis.

All of these signs are positive and point to continued strength heading into the fourth quarter from a same-store revenue growth perspective. Our teammates have been fantastic, as Chris mentioned. We were quick to adjust to the challenges presented to our business from the pandemic.

Long-standing practices and policies had to be adjusted quickly to adapt. Pricing and marketing strategies had to adapt. How we attract customers and provide excellent customer service had to adapt. We quickly developed and rolled out new technologies with our online SmartRental program and our CubeSmart customer app.

Just as importantly, as things shifted in a more positive direction, we quickly pivoted again. Our systems were quick to identify changing trends and we adjusted pricing upward accordingly. We were swift in resuming those traditional practices of consumer -- of customer rate increases and lean sales where appropriate.

Sometimes it takes some disruption and chaos for these things to become more evident. We have a strong team, sophisticated systems and a very high-quality portfolio. And when combined with a nimble approach, I believe, has led to some real outperformance on a relative basis over the last 6 months.

Collections and accounts receivable have returned to normal historical levels and again, speak to the quality of the cash flows in our sector, the quality of the self-storage customer and the high levels of customer diversification in our business.

In the third quarter, from an external growth perspective, we added 37 new stores to our third-party management platform. And while we didn't close on any acquisitions, we were certainly very busy getting a significant amount of transactions lined up for closing in the fourth quarter.

We have under contract and expect to close by year-end, the acquisition of 17 stores for an aggregate investment of $643.9 million. Part of that total is the 8-property Storage Deluxe transaction we announced early last week. We provided a good bit of detail on that transaction in an investor presentation that can be found on our website.

Of the $540 million purchase price, $201.7 million will be paid in cash, $154.6 million through the assumption of existing debt and notably, $183.7 million in the form of operating partnership units. We expect to close that transaction in 2 pieces during the month of December. Outside of that transaction, we have 9 additional stores under contract.

And those stores are located in Florida, Texas, Nevada and on Long Island. We were also busy after quarter end on the balance sheet. On October 6, we closed a $450 million unsecured bond issue with a long 10-year term maturing in 2031 and a yield to maturity of 2.1%.

This offering demonstrates our ongoing commitment to this market, and we appreciate the strong support we received from our fixed income investor base. The bond deal was partially opportunistic from a refinancing perspective and partially to create capacity to support external growth.

On the opportunistic side, we used proceeds to support the redemption of our debut $250 million bond offering from back in 2012 that had a coupon of 4.8%.

That redemption was completed on October 30 and included a $17.6 million make-whole payment the balance of the proceeds were used to repay amounts drawn on our revolver and provide funding for much of the external growth we've talked about. So we've been busy on the external growth and balance sheet fronts.

We remain very healthy and are well positioned to fund our near- and medium-term commitments, and we also have plenty of capacity, financial flexibility and access to attractive capital to support the pursuit of additional external growth opportunities. So thanks again for taking the time to join us for today's call.

At this point, Aileen, let's open up the call for some questions..

[Operator Instructions]. Our first question today comes from Juan Sanabria with BMO Capital..

Just hoping you could talk a little bit about Street rate trends and how those are trending throughout the quarter and into September and if you can give maybe some color on how New York specifically is trending within that..

Sure. This is Chris Marr. I'll take that question. So if you think about average asking net effective rents throughout the quarter, the average for the quarter was plus 9.3% on a year-over-year basis same store. That number really built throughout the quarter. Hitting September, we were about plus 15%.

As we sit here in October, that's about plus 20%, 19.6% to be exact. If you're looking in New York City, specifically the New York City assets in Brooklyn, the Bronx and Queens, it ran a bit better than those numbers that I just referred to.

And as we sit here today, in the city, we're up about 20%, 20.3% to be exact, and in the suburbs, slightly higher than that..

Very impressive. And then clearly, everybody has been more built up on the acquisition side. You guys did the Storage Deluxe transaction, congrats on that.

But if you could talk a little bit more broadly about what you're seeing kind of going forward into the fourth quarter beyond what you've already done and into '21 about just the quality of the pipeline.

Is more stabilized assets, development or lease-up assets and thoughts on cap rates?.

Juan, it's Tim. Yes. As it relates to the fourth quarter, we're pretty filled up here, given where we are in the calendar. What we have announced is under contract is likely to be where we land, not enough time really to get a whole lot much more queued up for the fourth quarter. I think big picture, you've seen a combination of things.

You have a traditionally busier time of year coming out of the summer months, when folks tend to want to put together listings and be transacting from a seller's point of view. That's nothing new.

I think you combine that here with the improvement and the stability that you've seen from an operating fundamental standpoint, I think that's really been part of what's driven the flurry of activity here that we've seen, not only for us but for others as well.

And then of course, you have a pretty low-cost certainly of debt capital available, which is, I think, spurring on some of the energy from the buyer side of the equation. From a cap rate perspective, we haven't seen a whole lot of movement.

I think the Simply transaction and obviously the acquirer of that being new to the space, I think, certainly is going to support cap rates remaining where they are, if not being pushed further down. I think the product on a relative basis to other product types remain incredibly attractive, which will continue to attract capital into our sector.

I think those trends are likely to continue into the early part of 2021. So I think it's a good time to be in the sector. I think others want to be in the sector. I think people are generally pretty well capitalized. And I think visibility into the performance of the product is much better than it was 3 to 6 months ago.

So I think that's going to be conducive to additional transactions and certainly a lot of interest..

Our next question comes from Todd Thomas with KeyBanc Capital Markets..

First question on the Storage Deluxe deal, what would you expect the overall yield to be in 2021?.

Yes. We haven't -- what we've been -- what we've been talking about is that, that transaction for us, we believe, a, we're really excited about it. From a yield perspective, we looked at our underwriting is targeting what we believe to be a market cap rate, which is in the mid-4s. That mid-4s is where we would expect to be at stabilization.

And we're not there in 2021. We have four of the assets are in some stage of lease-up, 2 are not there from a physical occupancy perspective, 2 others of the 8 are not fully stabilized from a rate perspective. So we're not at a stabilized yield in 2021 and aren't quite there in 2022 either.

We're really looking at stabilization in our underwriting occurring in 2023. So I would characterize 2021 and '22 to be a yield that gets us to the point where we're roughly FFO neutral in the early stages here.

But from a strategic standpoint, from how it fits nicely into the rest of the portfolio, obviously, we've had the benefit of operating the stores. We've been managing them since they opened.

But to bring those on balance sheet and to really round out, our market-leading position in Queens, Bronx and Brooklyn, we're incredibly excited about really just being the end of something for us that started 10 years ago..

All right. And that's helpful. And then can you talk about the funding plan for investments? You've historically funded investments 2/3 equity, 1/3 debt. It looks like a little more debt funding for the Storage Deluxe deal and what's under contract.

Is that still the right funding mix? Is that the right way to think about capitalizing these investments? Or are you contemplating additional equity to fund these investments and what else might be in the pipeline?.

Yes, appreciate that. The -- overall, I mean, we think about our balance sheet in a very consistent way from what you've seen from us for a very long period of time. We are a BBB, Baa2-rated company. And we think about managing the balance sheet within the metrics that are appropriate for that investment-grade credit rating.

And so from a funding on how we're going to close the transactions, we've put that in kind of a sources and uses way in our disclosures. So at closing, for instance, in the Deluxe transaction, I indicated that we need right around $200 million of cash to close.

We've obviously built up a fair amount of capacity in our credit metrics that we can fluctuate leverage levels up a little bit, down a little bit and we're not tied in the transactions.

While they're sizable transactions, and we're excited about it, they're not sizable to the point where they're going to meaningfully have any movement on any of our balance sheet metrics. Over the long haul, we would expect to continue to manage the balance sheet in a manner that you've seen from us consistently.

In the short term, we have a tremendous amount of flexibility as to how and when we use leverage and the time period in which we ultimately get to the credit metrics that we're comfortable with. Ideally, for us, we would still have credit metrics that are on the conservative side of the ranges for our rating.

So that we are in a position in the future at some point to take advantage of transactions despite perhaps a short-term disconnect in equity or debt valuations and cost of capital..

Okay. And just one other question here on the development pipeline. So you added Valley Stream this quarter. It's been a few quarters, I think, since you've added a new development property.

Are you seeing more opportunities there? Should we expect to see additional ground-up developments added to the pipeline? And are you sensing that development activity is just picking up again a little bit more broadly, just given the rebound we've seen here in fundamentals?.

Todd, it's Chris. I think to the last part of your question, not yet. So fundamentals rebounded pretty quickly, incredibly resilient business. But there are a lot of other elements that go into making decisions to put a shovel in the ground.

So again, have not seen really any change in behavior from the markets that we observe and then from our feedback from our third-party owners.

From our own perspective, opportunities continue to be more challenging to find in terms of areas for us that make sense that we can get comfortable around the costs and the rents and the yields that are produced from there.

So I think it will be more likely than not that the volume that we have under construction continues to shrink as opposed to expanding..

Our next question comes from Smedes Rose with Citigroup..

I just wanted to ask you in the quarter. I mean what we're hearing from other companies is that move-out activity was relatively subdued and move-in activity picked up. I was wondering if you saw something similar.

And maybe what are your thoughts about kind of moving -- move-out activity returning to more normalized levels? It doesn't sound like you're seeing that.

But would you expect that? Or do you think maybe that's not an issue?.

Smedes, it's Chris. So the move-out activity for us has been lower. For example, in October, vacates were down about 4% relative to October of last year. I think the reality of our business is we cannot force somebody to stay once they have moved in. However, I think we have all discovered that it is an incredibly sticky business.

Once one of our customers finds us and moves in and starts to appreciate the joy of having a less crowded home environment and how self-storage can really assist in helping them with their life's needs, they tend to stay.

At some point, whether we've seen a real shift and the normal patterns don't revert back to sort of the traditional mean, don't know at this point. I mean the customer we have is in some form of movement. Many of them, just the traditional forms of movement that we've seen in the past, some of them pandemic-related movement.

And I think we're going to have to see how all of this plays out. I think what we know is as the customer is, once in, is very sticky..

Okay. I mean you mentioned that the length of stay was increasing. What is the average length now? And I guess maybe you can put some context around it of maybe where it was a year ago or just kind of what have you seen..

Sure. I mean it's increasing by days, not by months. But overall, our average length of stay continues to be in that right around 14 months. And I would say that, that's probably elongated out meaningfully days over the last -- over the course of 2020..

Okay.

Just the other last thing I wanted to ask you is with your pro forma exposure to New York moving up here, is there any kind of upward limit, I guess, of how much exposure to New York City that you would want to have? Or is it more just dependent if you are able to find deals that you like?.

Yes. So again, we really do look at the markets that we're in as 3 distinct markets, and then within those markets, multiple distinct submarkets. So the Bronx, Brooklyn and Queens, and to some extent, we own an asset and manage assets in Staten Island and we own an asset in Manhattan.

But the predominant exposure is in the 3 larger outer boroughs, each of which is unique and each of which has unique submarkets within it. So there's no set parameter around it. We have the highest-quality portfolio. We have a very significant market share. There are other stores in those markets.

The reality of zoning in the boroughs is that stores tend to be clustered. So we would look at any future opportunities, do they fill in a submarket for us? These 8 that were under contract really do complement or expose us to submarkets that we had not been in prior. And we'll continue to look at any of those opportunities that may come up.

It's really not something at this stage that we would be aggressively going after. It would be, is there -- are there things that come to us that make sense from a portfolio management perspective? Obviously, we have 9 properties under contract in areas outside of New York City.

And over time, the -- obviously, the opportunity set is significantly greater in markets outside of the 3 boroughs in the New York MSA, and we'll continue to expand in those other parts of the country..

[Operator Instructions]. Our next question comes from Hong Zhang with JPMorgan..

I was wondering if you have a general sense of how much of your occupancy gains have been driven by, I guess, direct COVID disruption, such as work from home?.

Pretty impossible to break it down into that type. But we have consumers coming to us for so many different reasons. But I would think even if you tried to characterize this as something that is COVID-related, I mean, COVID-related could be, I want to -- I'm moving. I'm -- I need extra space for a home office.

I need to free up room for all kinds of different things. It's impossible -- we certainly don't have anybody signing up their leases saying, "I am a COVID-related customer." So it's a lot of anecdotal information.

I think what a pandemic does or has done here to demonstrate again that we have a product that fills a consumer's need for a temporary and safe place to store their belongings. And this is just one many, many things that happen over time that creates demand for our product type..

Got it. And I guess you had people moved in during the middle of lockdowns, where rates were down double digits. And you also paused your rent increases during that time as well.

Do you have a sense of how long it would take to move those people back to more market rents?.

So we reengaged, where feasible, the rate increase process to all of our customers. And that was all happening by September 30. If you think about those who moved in at probably the lowest point, which would have been in April, those customers will be eligible for a rate increase in 6 months later and then 12 months after that.

If you think about the rates and where rates dipped in April, you would be plus or minus that second rate increase. So at month 18, you would be getting them back up to kind of back up to par.

And then if you look at where we are today, it would take another -- it would probably take another 2 rate increases to get them to where we are in terms of today's rates..

This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the call back over to Chris Marr for any closing remarks..

Okay. Thanks, everybody, for participating. I know it's been a long earnings season. But self-storage particularly ended it on a high note, I hope, for all of you. And CubeSmart's performance in the quarter, and I'm confident as we go into the fourth quarter, will continue to be very, very good. So thank you all for listening.

Stay safe, and look forward to talking to you next year..

The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect..