C. Dan Smith - Senior Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer Vernon J. Nagel - Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of Executive Committee Richard K. Reece - Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Executive Vice President.
Matthew Schon McCall - BB&T Capital Markets, Research Division Jeffrey D. Osborne - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., Research Division Jonathan Dorsheimer - Canaccord Genuity, Research Division Peter Lisnic - Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, Research Division Jagadish K.
Iyer - Piper Jaffray Companies, Research Division Richard Michael Kwas - Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, Research Division Winifred Clark - UBS Investment Bank, Research Division.
Good morning, and welcome to Acuity Brands 2014 Conference Call, First Quarter Financial Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Today's conference is being recorded. If you have any objections, you may disconnect at this time. Now I would like to introduce Mr. Dan Smith, Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Secretary. Sir, you may begin..
Thank you. Good morning. With me today to discuss our fiscal 2014 first quarter results are Vern Nagel, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer; and Ricky Reece, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. We are webcasting today's conference call on our website at www.acuitybrands.com.
I would like to remind everyone that during this call, we may make projections or forward-looking statements regarding future events or future financial performance of the company. Such statements involve risks and uncertainties such that actual results may differ materially.
Please refer to our most recent 10-K and 10-Q SEC filings and today's press release, which identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in our projections or forward-looking statements. Now let me turn this call over to Vern Nagel..
Thank you, Dan. Good morning, everyone. Ricky and I would like to make a few comments, and then we will answer your questions. First off, our results for the first quarter of 2014 were just outstanding. Our net sales grew almost 20% this quarter, while our adjusted EPS grew nearly 40%, both first quarter records for Acuity.
In fact, this was the third quarter in a row where we achieved double-digit sales volume growth.
We believe this level of growth is, yet again, positive evidence our strategies provide our customers with differentiated value propositions and to diversify the end markets we serve are succeeding, allowing us to extend our leadership position in North America.
These strategies include the continued aggressive introduction of innovative, energy-efficient lighting solutions; expansion in key channels and geographies; and improvements in customer service and company-wide productivity.
Our profitability and cash flow for the quarter were, again, strong, even as we continued to fund our robust sales growth in areas with significant future growth potential, including the expansion of our lighting solutions portfolio. I know many of you have already seen our results, and Ricky will provide more detail later.
But I would like to make a few comments on the key highlights for the quarter. Net sales for the quarter were $575 million, an increase of almost 20% compared with the year-ago period. Reported operating profit for the quarter was $77.4 million compared with $48.2 million in the year-ago period.
In the current quarter, we received $5 million as a partial recovery for the fraud perpetrated by a former freight service provider to the company, for which we previously recognized as an expense in the third quarter of 2013.
Also in the year-ago quarter, we incurred certain costs for restructuring actions and inefficiencies associated with a plant closure, which, in total, reduced operating profit by $5.5 million. I find it helpful to add back these items to both quarters' results to make them comparable.
Doing so, one can see that adjusted operating profit for the current quarter was $72.4 million or 12.6% of net sales compared with $53.7 million or 11.2% of net sales for the year-ago period. This represents an increase in adjusted operating profit of 35%, while adjusted operating profit margin improved 140 basis points.
Diluted earnings per share were $1.03. Adjusted EPS for the current quarter was $0.96 compared with $0.69 in the year-ago period, an increase of 39%, very strong results indeed. The results for the quarter were significant improvements over the year-ago period. We believe you will find them even more impressive upon further analysis.
While net sales grew almost 20% compared with a year ago, we estimate sales volume grew approximately 21% this quarter. While precise market data is not available at this time, we believe this level of sales volume growth was meaningfully higher than the overall markets we serve.
We estimate that the impact of price changes and the mix of products sold reduced net sales by a modest 1%. The impact of acquisitions and foreign currency in net sales was not significant.
The growth in net sales was broad-based along virtually all major product lines, while certain specialty fixtures more closely associated with new construction continue to lag the overall average due to tepid environment for new, larger, nonresidential construction projects.
From a sales channel perspective, we continue to experience strong growth in the commercial, industrial and infrastructure channels for both indoor and outdoor applications, as well as continued growth for larger renovation projects.
Sales growth in our largest channel, commercial and industrial, was above this quarter's overall percentage increase primarily due to a continued focus on smaller to medium-size indoor and outdoor projects for both new construction and renovation, as well as continued emphasis on selling higher value-added lighting solutions, especially LED luminaires, which, again, more than doubled compared with the year-ago period.
In fact, each quarter for the last 3 years in a row, sales of LED products at Acuity have more than doubled compared with the year-ago periods.
We believe this level of growth is far outpacing the growth rates of our largest competitors for these types of products, further demonstrating our formidable capabilities and product development and our leadership in market access.
Additionally, we enjoyed growth in our residential projects -- or products as demand for new housing and renovation of existing homes continued to rebound. We continue to experience growth in most geographies and sales channels in North America, all of which is very encouraging, though this was offset somewhat by continued weakness in Europe.
Excluding LED luminaires, we believe the puts and takes for product pricing, as well material and component cost, were, again, fairly benign this quarter. Looking at the overall market conditions for the first quarter, we believe spending in key segments of the U.S.
nonresidential construction market in which we participate was up low mid-single digits compared with a year ago, while residential construction was up more than 20%.
Further, as I mentioned earlier, while precise market data for the quarter is not yet available, we believe the overall lighting market grew in the upper mid-single digit range during the quarter, supported by growth in renovation, as well as the residential market.
This is in stark contrast compared with our sales volume growth in North America, which was up more than 20%.
Lastly, we believe our sales channel and product diversification, as well as our strategies to better serve customers with new, more innovative lighting solutions and the strength of our many sales forces, have allowed us to achieve meaningful sales growth again this quarter.
Before I turn the call over to Ricky, I would like to comment on our profitability and strategic accomplishments in the quarter. Excluding the impact of the items I noted earlier, adjusted operating profit margin for the first quarter was a solid 12.6%, up 140 basis points compared with the year-ago period.
This is particularly noteworthy given that sales of LED luminaires are now more than 1/4 of our total net sales. Further, as Ricky will discuss later in the call, gross profit margin grew 90 basis points to 41.3% from the prior year's adjusted gross profit margin.
The margin expansion was primarily due to benefits from higher sales volume, productivity gains and previous restructuring actions, as well as lower costs for certain LED components. This was partially offset by changes in product mix.
As we have noted in previous calls, the mix of products sold and larger renovation projects tend to have a lower gross profit margin profile than our overall average margin.
We also continue to experience a higher mix of sales of less-featured, value-oriented products sold through certain sales channels primarily for renovation, which also tend to have a lower-than-average margin profile.
Next, total selling, distribution and administrative expenses, excluding the benefit of the $5 million recovery noted earlier, were up approximately 17% on the sales increase of 20%. Adjusted SD&A expenses as a percentage of net sales were 28.7% in the current quarter compared with 29.2% in the year-ago period, a decline of 50 basis points.
The increase in total SD&A expense was due primarily to higher variable cost for commissions and freight to support the growth in net sales, as well as higher employee-related cost, including incentive compensation, partially offset by benefits from previously implemented restructuring programs.
Incentive compensation expense was higher compared with the year-ago period due to the significant improvement in year-over-year performance this quarter. We all tend to compare a quarter's results to the same period in the prior year.
Usually, our net sales for the first quarter of a given year are less than the previous year's fourth quarter due to the seasonal nature of the nonresidential construction market. Interestingly, our net sales this quarter were down only 1% from the previous fourth quarter.
In prior years, the decline on a sequential basis was usually in the 4% to 7% range. Further, if incentive compensation expense have been the same as incurred in the fourth quarter, our operating profit margin this quarter would have been slightly higher than that posted in the fourth quarter. Again, very strong results indeed.
On the strategic front, we continued our rapid pace of introductions of new products, significantly expanding our industry-leading portfolio of innovative, energy-efficient luminaires and lighting control solutions. As I mentioned earlier, our solid-state lighting portfolio continues to expand rapidly, as are the sales of these luminaires.
Today, more than 1/4 of our net sales are from LED luminaires, and we continue to fund the development of holistic lighting solutions for specification applications such as schools, health care facilities, commercial office buildings and various outdoor applications to fully leverage our award-winning portfolio of lighting fixtures, controls and components.
More impressively, our adjusted operating profit margin continued to expand, while sales of LED-based solutions continue to be a growing and meaningful portion of our overall business. As we have noted before, Acuity is a clear leader in digital lighting solutions.
It is because we understand lighting and the sophisticated needs of our expansive customer base. We are able to offer customers tailored solutions from industry-leading portfolio regardless of the light source. Our expertise lies in the true understanding of the proper use and control of light while minimizing the use of energy.
We are without equal in the design and development of fixtures and integrated lighting systems for virtually any application without a bias of the light source.
This expertise, coupled with a fully integrated, lean supply chain, allows us to produce virtually any type of fixture or lighting control system cost-effectively and efficiently for our customers.
This is because we are without the cumbersome and expensive legacy costs and fixed investment needed to produce certain components like lamps, ballasts or LED chips. We source these components through our design specification from the very best suppliers around the globe.
This structure allows us to provide customers with superior value while delivering upper-quartile results for our shareholders. As I've noted before, our organization has a long and distinguished history of leading and innovating during the eras of technology disruption. Today is clearly no different.
Acuity Brands is leading the evolution to intelligent lighting solutions with a broad and deep portfolio of indoor and outdoor solid-state and traditional, energy-efficient luminaires and lighting controls. And we are delivering profitable growth and strong financial returns for our shareholders while making these important investments.
We have been able to produce these robust results because of the dedication resolve of our more than 6,500 associates to deliver superior value to our customers, as well as driving improvements and efficiencies throughout the company to provide superior returns for our shareholders.
I will talk more about our future growth strategies and expectations for the construction market later in the call. I would like to now turn the call over to Ricky before I make a few comments regarding our focus for the balance of 2014.
Ricky?.
Thank you, Vern, and good morning, everyone. I will highlight a few items regarding our income statement, and then we'll discuss our cash flow and financial condition before turning the call back to Vern.
Vern covered the primary drivers for our sales growth and our profitability, so I will not repeat these items, but I will provide a bit more color on certain aspects of our first quarter results.
As Vern mentioned earlier, our fiscal 2014 first quarter results included an insurance recovery of $5 million pretax, or $0.07 diluted earnings per share, from the fraud perpetrated at a freight service provider to the company.
As you may recall, we previously recognized an $8.1 million expense in the third quarter of fiscal 2013 related to the company's loss due to this matter. This payment covers a portion of the loss we suffered, and we continue to seek additional recovery of our loss. If we obtain any further recovery, we will record it when realized.
These items are recorded within our selling, distribution and administrative expenses.
Also in the year-ago quarter, we incurred certain costs associated with streamlining actions and inefficiencies associated with a plant closure, which, in total, reduced operating profit by $5.5 million or $0.08 per diluted EPS, with $4.8 million recorded in the cost of goods sold and the remaining $0.7 million recorded as a special charge.
As Vern mentioned, we find it useful to exclude these items from our GAAP results to provide greater comparability and enhanced visibility into the company's results, and we have included in our earnings release a full reconciliation of our GAAP amounts to these adjusted results.
Our gross profit margin for our fiscal first quarter was 41.3% and increased 90 basis points compared with the adjusted year-ago period on an almost 20% increase in net sales, due largely to the favorable impact of the increased net sales volume, lower material and component costs primarily related to LED fixtures and benefits from greater manufacturing utilization and improved productivity, partially offset by unfavorable price mix.
Our adjusted operating profit margin increased an impressive 140 basis points to 12.6% compared with the adjusted operating margin in the year-ago period.
Adjusted operating profit increased by $18.7 million or 35% compared with last year due to the higher gross profit, greater leverage of our operating costs due to the higher sales volumes, and benefits from our previously announced streamlining actions, partially offset by higher employee-related cost, including incentive compensation.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2014, we completed the closure of the 2 small production facilities, which are part of the streamlining actions initiated in the prior year.
We did not record any significant incremental expense during the first quarter associated with the closing of the facilities, and we estimate that we realized approximately $3 million of pretax savings associated with the streamlining activities this quarter.
We still expect to realize total annualized savings of $15 million and believe we'll be at this full run rate by the end of the second fiscal quarter of this year.
These savings should help offset important investments we are continuing to make to expand our product and solution portfolio and enhance our production, distribution and customer service and support capabilities. The effective tax rate for the first quarter was 35.3%, virtually unchanged from the 35.4% in the first quarter of last year.
We estimate the effective tax rate for the fiscal year 2014 will be approximately 35.5% before any discrete items and if the rates in our taxing jurisdictions remain generally consistent throughout the year. Now let's look at cash flow for the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2013.
Cash flow generated from operations for the first quarter of fiscal year 2014 was $43.4 million compared with net cash used for operation of $14.5 million in the prior year. This year-over-year improvement reflects higher net income and lower working capital requirements.
Total operating working capital of 43 days at November 30, 2013 improved 5 days compared with the prior year. In the first quarter of fiscal year 2014, we spent $8.5 million on capital expenditures compared with $11.2 million in the prior year period. We currently expect to spend approximately $50 million in capital expenditures in fiscal year 2014.
At November 30, 2013, we had a cash balance of $398.1 million, an increase of $39 million since the beginning of the fiscal year. Our total debt was $354 million. Consequently, our cash exceeded debt at the end of the first quarter.
At November 30, 2013, we had additional borrowing capacity of $243.8 million under our credit facility that does not mature until January 2017. So we continue to maintain a significant amount of financial flexibility. Lastly, you may have seen early last month that Standard & Poor's raised our debt rating to BBB from BBB- with a stable outlook.
They based their revised rating on our relatively strong credit metrics and that they think will be maintained in their view of modestly improving end markets. In addition, Moody's, late last month, revised our rating outlook to positive from stable and affirmed our Baa3 rating.
Moody's cited favorable prospects for revenue expansion and stated as volumes improve, operating margins should strengthen. They further said that these factors, combined with a strong balance sheet, liquidity and ongoing free cash flow, should improve the company's credit stature. Thank you, and I'll now turn the call back to Vern..
expand and leverage our industry-leading product and solutions portfolio, coupled with our extensive market presence and our considerable financial strength to capitalize on market growth opportunities that will produce -- that will provide our customers with unmatched value and our shareholders with superior returns.
This all takes focus and resources. We are funding these activities today because we see great future opportunity. Through these investments, we have significantly expanded our addressable market, and our sales growth reflects what we believe are the early stages of this opportunity.
As I have said before, we believe the lighting and lighting-related industry will experience significant growth over the next decade, particularly as energy and environmental concerns come to the forefront.
We continue to believe the many markets we serve as part of the broader lighting industry could grow by more than 50% over the next few years, providing us with significant growth potential. As the North American market leader, we are positioned well to fully participate in this exciting industry.
Thank you, and with that, we will entertain any questions that you have..
[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Matt McCall from BB&T Capital Markets..
So on that SG&A line, I'm just trying to connect all the dots and understand the expectations going forward, make sure I understand it. You've helped in the past -- I think Vern was providing kind of a fixed variable breakdown.
But if you take into account your planned investments, you take into account the expected savings, and then as comps get tougher, I would assume maybe incentive comp eases a little bit, can you just give us some kind of idea about how you plan to leverage it as we move through the years maybe relative to what we've been told in the past?.
So Matt, our incentive compensation programs are pure pay-for-performance. It's based on period-over-period performance. This quarter's results were, again, as you mentioned, great. They were just outstanding.
And so based on -- it's formulaic -- based on the formulas that we have, and it impacts virtually all of the salaried folks in our organization, we essentially maxed out based on the performance. So when we think about our SD&A and the components of it, in the past, we have said that freight and commissions, together, kind of average around 11.5%.
And it can vary depending on the mix, so on and so forth, but that's not a bad target number. The balance is -- it's not really fixed per se because, again, incentive compensation could vary. In the past, we have said that that number probably is in the 95-ish range.
Given the outperformance this quarter and how we booked that, that number probably was near $99 million to $100 million total. The incentive compensation piece, if I back that out and look at the other components, the other components were up less than 2%. So we are leveraging our fixed, if you will, SD&A base.
And the incentive comp is purely based on the outsize period-over-period performance. And so what I would submit to you is that management's desire is to continue to outperform and book at a higher level of incentive compensation..
Okay. Now that's helpful. And then, I guess, looking at -- you talked about continued strong trends into December.
And I'm just curious, maybe stepping back and looking at the business overall, maybe even compare it to last cycle or look at trends more recently, but what -- are you seeing anything in the trends that says there could be incremental benefits on the margin front coming in the next couple of quarters? And what I'm getting at is you keep talking about the impact of mix and how projects are hurting mix.
I'm wondering about the penetration of controls and how that's benefiting. And I'm just wondering about the trends with margins and what the patterns in your orders are telling you, if anything..
Well, as we said earlier, new construction for larger projects continues to be tepid, but yet the outlook by various prognosticators is very favorable. If you look at commercial construction, the expectation is quite, quite positive, if you look at manufacturing.
Just as the economy improves, as overall employment improves, these areas are influenced by that. And again, the prognosticators really show favorable trends there. We continue to see smaller and medium-sized projects be even more predominant opportunity. Renovation still is a larger portion of the mix than, say, it has been historically.
We're very excited about that continuing.
And then you add on top of that the potential for growth in these more traditional areas of strength for Acuity, I think it creates a level of optimism internally that, to the extent Washington doesn't do anything that derails consumer business optimism, you can see later in 2014, '15 and '16, I think, a fairly robust opportunity, a growing market for Acuity.
This is why we say we believe that our markets, our addressable markets, have the opportunity over the next 3-plus years to grow at very substantial rates. And we are uniquely positioned with our product portfolio, both of conventional lighting, LED components and other products that we sell, to participate fully in this.
If I look at our business -- if you go back to the first quarter of 2013, you'll recall that it was a flat quarter. I think it was up maybe 1%. And the issue back then was debt ceiling, government shutdown, all sorts of issues that we think tempered business confidence. And so you saw that back then.
But if I then think about second quarter of last year, 6% growth. If I think about the third quarter, 11% growth. If I think about the fourth quarter, 13% growth. We posted 20% this quarter, so potentially, the 20% was somewhat influenced by a lesser-than-robust first quarter. But our momentum in terms of our unit volume growth continues to build.
And we are working hard to execute our strategies to outperform the markets we serve. Again, we don't have precise data on what our quarter did -- or excuse me, the markets did, but we, again, believe that we meaningfully outperformed what the growth rates would have been in our traditional markets.
And I would say that our order rates for December were favorable and continue to suggest this improving condition of the overall markets. So I hope that gave you some context and backdrop..
Yes, it does.
And forgive me, Dan, for the follow-up, but just from a mix perspective on the margin front as we look out, I know it's a long-winded question, but is there anything in the mix that could really benefit the margin? Or is it more leverage that we're going to be looking at and productivity gains and the like?.
No, we said that -- this is Vern. We said that as our mix becomes more influenced by larger new construction projects, we anticipate selling a more broad-based portfolio, which tends to have a more rich mix. So those markets of new construction tend to pull all or a lot of our products, and we do well when that happens.
I would point out that if you look at our gross profit margin on virtually the same level of volume compared to what we did in the previous fourth quarter, so sequentially, we added, what, Ricky, 40 bps?.
40 basis points..
Of improvement in gross profit on essentially the same mix. So we're driving productivity, and we see out there, when it happens, we can't necessarily control that, a more rich mix of products being sold into larger new construction projects in addition to what we're doing on the renovation side. So I believe that that's robust..
Our next question comes from Jeff Osborne with Stifel..
Just 2 quick ones. In the past, there had been investor consternation with kind of the disparity or the perceived disparity of gross margins of LED products versus non-LED. I think the dramatic improvement you've seen over the past 4 to 6 quarters has kind of suggested that, that disparity may be -- or their concerns were unfounded or overstated.
But is there a sense of perspective that you can give us for calendar 2013, the LED chip cost declines, how much that benefited your gross margin improvement versus some of the restructuring in utilization rates? I'm just trying to get -- if you can either rank order or dive specifically into the LED issue or perceived issue, if those things are kind of at parity now..
Yes, I'd prefer not to go there because the ability of Acuity, given its size and its opportunities, it may have a different ability, if you will, to source componentry at classes that are different than folks that don't have our size, scale and capability. We will say that LED components continue to decline.
The pricing of LED luminaires continues to decline. And as Ricky has pointed out in the past, that simple math allows for improvement, if you will, in the gross margin percentage on those products.
I think that it is, again, very interesting to note, to your point, people in the past have assumed or made some assumptions that LED components -- excuse me, LED luminaires have, in general, lower margins as a percentage. We have said and have consistently said that our margins for similar products are in the range.
And I think it's bearing out that we have the ability to continue to improve margins while LED fixtures are becoming a more and more meaningful percentage of our total. We're now over a quarter of our total revenues.
So we have other items in there other than just luminaires, now LED-based luminaires, and yet our gross profit margins continue to improve. So I think that for Acuity, we've been able to debunk, if you will, the notion that somehow, LED products, in general, have a lot lower margin profile.
An individual product may or may not, but that's true in, really, any product..
Jeff, on the streamlining benefits, the savings there, the $3 million, we did recognize $3 million this quarter improvement as a result of those actions that we took late last year. About 75%, 80% of that is in the SD&A line. The remainder is in the cost of goods sold line.
So there are some benefit there and then productivity gains as we leveraged the volume on our fixed cost, as well as just continuing our lean journey. And improving our supply chain cost factor has also enabled us to improve margins..
Excellent. And the last question is just on the -- going back to the LED side again.
Could you just, generically, talk about where you would perceive, in calendar 2013, you're the strongest, whether it's indoor, retrofits or outdoor residential? Where would you kind of rank order in hindsight where you've had the most success through the year and where you see some opportunities for growth in 2014 and '15?.
So Acuity is the North American market leader, both in indoor and outdoor luminaires. And we believe that the adoption rate of LED for certain applications, Outdoor is probably a little bit ahead of Indoor. Indoor, primarily on the Renovation side.
So we have -- we believe we're in the very, very early innings of the adoption of LED into that commercial office space, and that's a big wheelhouse for Acuity. So we would look to really leverage growth there and continue to leverage our product portfolio in both Indoor and Outdoor.
When we look at markets, commercial, industrial, infrastructure, the Outdoor, Indoor and Outdoor have done very, very well for us, and we expect that to continue..
Our next question comes from Jed Dorsheimer from Canaccord..
I guess, Vern, first question. Just with respect to the TAM, you've talked about sort of the -- your business in the downturn, the total addressable market sort of being around that $10 billion number.
As you added the controls, sort of adding $500 million to another $1 billion, and then as new construction comes back, seeing that sort of $10.5 billion to $11 billion over the next several years kind of growing to that, I think it was $15 billion, $16 billion level.
So I was wondering if -- as your results in the second half of '13 have seen a marked increase -- or for most of the year, actually, how much you attribute to new construction versus renovation and where we are in that, where you see the total addressable market right now. And then I have a follow-up to that..
So Jed, for us, we guesstimated that for fiscal 2013, our addressable market was roughly a little less than $13 billion. And so you can pick any time frame you want, but where we see growth coming from is continued renovation.
If you look at the installed base here in North America, what is it, 100 billion square feet of installed building space, 70% of which was put in place before 1990. If you then further assume $2 a square foot for lighting, another $0.50 a square foot for controls and lighting solutions, it's a $250 billion market that converts at a very slow rate.
So Renovation and people who are getting after that market due to energy savings but better quality of light in those spaces, it can convert faster, the better we're able to get to those types of folks. So that pond will allow us the opportunity for growth.
Put on top of that now us rebounding, albeit at a slower but yet increasing rate for new construction, it's a pretty solid performance. I believe that you have seen that others -- we have a chart that shows, on an inflation-adjusted basis, what the nonresidential construction market looked like. It peaked in 2008, and it declined about 35%.
It's come back about 5 points. So it's still off on an inflation-adjusted basis from its peak. We expect that to now start to come back.
So not only do you have the benefit of new construction, but we also believe that we will be selling more value per square foot, don't have precise numbers around it, as we get more and more into fairly sophisticated lighting solutions to take advantage of daylight harvesting to actually generate energy savings while you're using the space.
So these are some of the attributes or some of the drivers that we see pushing the market to potentially 50% higher over the next 3 to 4 years as we look forward..
It's sort of a great segue into my second question, which was going to be around -- you're seeing 25% now with LEDs. And if you go to that digital control, I would assume, but I'd like you to comment on this, that the controllability starts to become more important.
So can you break out sort of that controlled aspect or what percentage of your business now versus maybe a year ago you think you have a much better shot on goal in terms of adding the controls features to maybe systems versus just a standalone device?.
Sure. If you -- first of all, our LED sales are more than 25%. I just want to be clear on that. They're not at 25%. The notion of lighting solutions and controls, if you sell an individual control device, sure, you can measure that.
But more and more, with LED-based luminaires, virtually, all of our LED-based luminaires has some level of control embedded in it.
The level of sophistication, what it can do, so on and so forth, how it interfaces with other luminaries as part of the lighting system and how that ties into building management, those are all different levels of sophistication.
It is becoming impossible for us to say, that luminaire, which has a value proposition, is the value proposition and the price, is it because it has embedded controls or is it because it's LED? We don't even go there with that, Jed. It's just -- it's too hard.
So what we believe is that these luminaires for a like kind compared to, say, conventional lighting, have the ability to have higher prices, and it depends, it's all over the map, based on the value and the level of control and what you're attempting to do with it.
At the most sophisticated level, where it's tied into daylight harvesting and the ability to feed that back into building management systems, the system with the quality of light that we provide, the ability to have it be modular so you can upgrade it, all of these things are wonderful value propositions. And we sell that value.
We're in a bid business, but we sell that value. And obviously, the growth rates that we have in our LED-based luminaires, which are way above the rest of the industry, are because we offer the full range of features and benefits..
Our next question comes from Peter Lisnic from Robert W. Baird..
Vern, a couple of times, I think, and in the Q, you've mentioned that you've got some under-penetrated opportunities. I was wondering if you could give us a little bit of color on what those might be without obviously getting in the competitive specifics. But if you're growing volume, it's something around 20%. You still got opportunities out there.
Can you give us a little bit of insight as to where those might be, whether those are markets or geographies or technologies and then tie in just the -- the balance sheet being in a net cash position gives you a tremendous amount of flexibility. So if you can maybe add that into the commentary as well, that'd be very helpful..
So in 2013, we generated $2.1 billion of revenues against a total addressable market of a little less than $13 billion. So until we get to $13 billion, I would say that our opportunities continue to be fairly robust in all areas. And I'm being a little facetious with you. But we see opportunities to expand our product portfolio of good, better, best.
We're the market leader in both indoor, as well as outdoor, but yet we see just significant opportunities to add features and benefits, real value propositions to the customer base to allow us to gain share. And I would say it's across the board.
And we're only limited by our own creativity and our own ability to create solutions that our customers are willing to buy. And it's not just products and solutions. If you're a contractor, it's how well can you serve that contract or how can you bring value to them to make them even more efficient.
So when you think about how we bring luminaires and controls and that whole package as a solution, making it simple, plug and play, easy to install, easy to commission, all of these features and benefits have real meaning and real points of differentiation.
So our investments going forward continue to be in the area of being -- of taking very sophisticated technology and making it smart and simple for people to use and install. And we believe that that's a point of differentiation that will allow us to gain additional share as we go forward.
When I think about our primary channels, we sell through 14 different channels, the broadest in the industry.
And if you look at -- geographically and then you look at channels, we had good growth that was broad-based, and that's what gives me and Ricky and Dan great enthusiasm around -- we're executing well locally, and our product portfolio and our lighting solutions people are listening to the voice of the customer and really bringing the kind of value that folks want.
And we're able to differentiate that against our competitors, and it's allowing us to grow. You're right. We're sitting on $400 million of cash, more cash than debt today. We continue to look at acquisition opportunities, small/medium. I wish I could say larger, not too much larger.
And we will be disciplined as we have been in terms of what we would like to acquire and who we would like to be part of the family and why. So we'll continue that level of discipline. And our expectation is we'll continue to put that capital to work in the most efficient way for shareholders to realize their returns..
Okay. All right. And then just second question, you alluded to it a little bit with the commodity inflation that you're seeing. I think we've seen a couple of competitors come out with price increases on the non-LED side. Can you maybe comment on likelihood of price increase, when, magnitude? It sounds like it's low, maybe mid-single digits on non-LED.
Is that kind of a fair ballpark to be thinking about if, indeed, you need to go to the market with a price increase?.
No, Pete, I'm not going to comment on what our strategy will be relative to that. I will comment on our overall pricing strategy, and we are very focused on what the value proposition we can bring to the market and how we price that.
Most of what we do is a bid, and so we're looking to sell features and benefits and extract the value for our shareholders but providing real value back to the customer base.
And so all of us are, and when I say us, I mean Acuity, are looking at where can we extract that value, where do we need to push price into the marketplace to help us preserve and enhance our margins. So we are looking at that every day. And costs ebb and they flow, and we have to be sensitive to that.
We are aggressive pricers in that we will push price up to the extent that we can add value to our customers. So I realize that some have come out with price increases. I can't comment because I don't know what their motivation was. I can tell you that we look at our pricing strategy, literally, monthly and even more than that.
And in instances where we are bidding, we're pushing our prices in a way that allow us to really sell value to the customer and improve our margins. When you look at our margins at the gross profit level, we're improving those margins on similar mix.
So we're very aggressive in terms of how we work our cost structure and very aggressive on how we sell our value proposition to our customer base..
Our next question comes from Jagadish Iyer from Piper Jaffray..
Two questions, Vern. First, when you talked about TAM, you talked about the gross margins for the LED side versus the non-LED portion.
So how should we be thinking about it as we look at it 12 months from now in terms of how the gross margin profile, at least qualitatively, how should we think about it, given that there is going to be some formidable players going to be aggressive on this LED lighting? And then I have a follow-up..
Well, the most formidable player is Acuity in LED lighting, so let me just be clear about that. We continue to expand our margins. I think that this quarter was reflective of margin expansion, again, $575 million. If you look at our just previous quarter, our fourth quarter, we did $580 million, so call that the same.
We added 40 basis points of margin improvement, and yet we continue to grow our LED-based business. In truth, we do not look at -- we don't look at LED versus non-LED. We look at the application. We look at what the customer is trying to do, and we sell from a full wagon. We are not trying to push one versus the other.
We're trying to push the right solution and provide the right solution to what the customer is trying to do. We believe that LEDs will continue to be a growing and more meaningful part of the business, and we are pushing that hard because it provides customers, in many instances, with a better value proposition. So we're listening to them.
I think that what you can see from the expansion in our margin from fourth quarter -- at gross profit margin from fourth quarter to first quarter is a continued reflection of how we bring that value to the customers, how we price that into the market, that value proposition into the market, and how we continue to use, as Ricky pointed out in his comments, lean and other capabilities to drive productivity throughout our business.
So I said earlier that we would expect our gross profit margins to, over time, continue to expand as we drive productivity, as we bring more value-oriented products to the marketplace, including lighting solutions, which are, again, sophisticated systems that are smart and simple for end users to use.
And we believe that will continue to also enhance our margin profile over time..
Okay, that's helpful. Second, as a follow-up, I just wanted to understand. You did talk about some pricing pressure.
I just wanted to find out, was there anything abnormal in the LED channel versus the traditional one?.
I would say pricing is very local, project-specific, so on and so forth. And I would say that the answer to that would be no. We don't see a differentiation necessarily between conventional and LED. We just see in local situations where that job, that project, that local influence, whatever it may happen to be, that local competitive dynamic.
And I think that that is not atypical in our industry..
Our next question comes from Rich Kwas from Wells Fargo..
Vern, just -- I know you talked to the lack of a sequential decline sequentially or from quarter-to-quarter here in terms of revenues.
And is there anything special here that hit this quarter, where there was some project activity that really benefited you? Or did you notice any prebuy activity? Just curious to see if we should be aware of anything that was noteworthy on that end this quarter..
No. I believe that it began as a continuation of how we have been executing our strategies around our product portfolio, around providing value into the various channels and just continuing to execute pretty well along providing the right solutions to customers in those channels and in those geographies.
I can't think of anything that was uniquely special or large when we think about our business. It's so broad-based, and it touches so many portions of the North American market that any one big job wouldn't necessarily influence the overall revenues. And that wasn't the case this quarter..
Okay, all right. And then on the gross margin, a couple of quarters ago, you talked about the renovation activity being a -- having a dampening impact and whether it was the kind of the base fluorescent business and kind of the jobs that were less customized.
And you had a nice uptick in the gross margin this quarter, and you seem a little more optimistic about gross margins getting better sooner than maybe what was perceived a couple of quarters ago.
Is this -- I imagine the construction piece, and you talked about kind of tepid growth there, and that's a potentially a big driver to your margins in the intermediate term.
But what's really changed there on the margin side? Because that's one of the things that I noticed here in this quarter aside from the top line as being definitely much better than expected. So any color there would be helpful..
Sure. We believe that the mix this quarter compared to, say, the sequential fourth quarter is probably around the same. But we continue to drive productivity into our business. Our teams on our supply chain side are doing a great job. We're very focused around that. We really work hard to sell the value proposition of Acuity. We don't lead with price.
We lead with features and benefits and solutions and service. So we continue to work that as part of a process, and I think we're always continuing to improve how we sell our value proposition to our various customer base. But we're working hard to continue to improve that top line and to improve the mix of our business.
So while the mix didn't change materially this quarter, we see, as we look out forward, that mix improving.
When does the commercial market start to improve, where it's no longer tepid, where we're actually seeing some growth? Again, whether it's a Dodge or a Global Insight or some of these other forecast companies, they have a fairly positive view of what the next 3 to 5 years look like in these key verticals where Acuity has traditionally really applied its strength and its broad value proposition.
And we sell a more fulsome amount of our product compared to certain renovation projects, where it may be a single-type fixture, or only a few fixtures, where the competitive nature of the marketplace just says that the pricing on those things is going to be much more exposed than a full package would be.
So our enthusiasm around margins on a go-forward basis, and I'm not talking about next quarter or the quarter after that, I'm talking about over the next 1,000 days, as these markets potentially come back, we think we're positioned well, both with our portfolio, our access to market and our complete value proposition to extract improved margin and extract value there..
Okay, that's helpful. And then just one last quick one for Ricky. The $3 million of savings, did that fully flow through this quarter, or was there some offset in the SD&A line with spending? And then with the remaining, once you hit the annualized rate, the earlier or, I guess, last quarter, or the quarter before, you've discussed about some offsets.
And I know you've mentioned that earlier in the call, but I mean, should we think of that as there's going to be some spending here and is that full $50 million is still not going to be -- not going to completely flow through? Is that still the right assumption?.
That is the right assumption. We continue to make investments or increase our spending in areas of sales and marketing support and so forth. So we're reinvesting some of these savings back into our SD&A cost. So while we've realized all of those savings, we are consuming some of those.
As Vern commented on, as wage inflation, the cost of health care, the incentive comp, as well as we add more support capability, marketing capability, to continue to drive this growth, we will consume some of those savings in those endeavors..
And some of that hit -- some of that $3 million was absorbed in the initiatives, right, in the quarter?.
Right, absolutely..
Again, just to further comment, our quarter was an exceptional quarter on a period-over-period basis. So the way our incentive systems work and the 3 key areas are earnings growth; quality of earnings, so improving our margins; and cash flow. And they're split 1/3-1/3-1/3 in terms of incentive compensation.
And we were at the upper end of our performance grids in that. So we improved total operating profit margins by 140 basis points while funding a meaningful difference in incentive compensation. So for us to continue to accrue at that very high rate would require us to perform at this type of level of performance. We're not predicting that.
We're not forecasting that, but we, as a management team, are incented to deliver that..
Winnie Clark from UBS, you may ask your question..
You did talk about looking at disciplined M&A, but I was curious, you continue to have a very strong balance sheet that's strengthening further.
Are you thinking any differently about capital allocation broadly at this point?.
Ricky?.
Not really. If you look back historically at how we've allocated our capital, we've returned about half of our free cash flow to shareholders in the form of dividends and stock repurchase. We've spent about 1/3 of our free cash flow on acquisitions. And then the remainder, we've used for our own internal capital expenditures for organic growth.
That mix isn't going to stay exactly that every quarter every year, and it's hard to predict on the M&A side. If we look at the priority, M&A would be our -- organic growth, of course, we're going to continue to do that. And then M&A, as Vern mentioned earlier, though, we're going to be disciplined about that.
But you've seen us do 2 or 3 acquisitions in almost each of the last 5 years, some of them bigger, medium or much smaller. But I think you will continue to see us looking there.
If we don't see the opportunity on the M&A and all, then we'll continue to look at ways to be shareholder-friendly in that and return it to shareholders in the form of repurchase of shares and the dividend..
Great, that's helpful. And then I was curious, I know you don't give forward guidance, but some companies have talked about weather and holiday timing in December and January being -- having a negative impact on their business.
And I'm curious, as we think about 2Q, is that something that we should potentially consider as we adjust our models going forward?.
No. For us, we have seasonality in Q2. It's historically our lowest quarter in terms of top line. But no, we don't think that the cold snap-- while, unfortunately, Ricky's pipes in his house burst, his lighting is fine. So we don't think that that is going to influence our second quarter one way or the other at this stage..
I would like to turn the call back over to Mr. Vernon Nagel for closing remarks..
Everyone, thank you for your time this morning. We strongly believe we are focusing on the right objectives, deploying the proper strategies and driving the organization to succeed in critical areas that will, over the longer term, deliver strong returns to our key stakeholders. Our future is very bright. Thank you for your support..
This concludes today's conference. Thank you for participating. You may disconnect at this time..