Good day. And welcome to Zscaler Second Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in listen only mode. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today’s conference is being recorded. I’d now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Mr.

Bill Choi, Senior Vice President of Investor Relations and Strategic Finance. Please go ahead..

Good afternoon, everyone, and welcome to the Zscaler second quarter fiscal year 2024 earnings conference call. On the call with me today are Jay Chaudhry, Chairman and CEO; and Remo Canessa, CFO. Please note that we have posted our earnings release and a supplemental financial schedule to our Investor Relations website.

Unless otherwise noted, all numbers we talk about today will be on an adjusted non-GAAP basis. You will find the reconciliation of GAAP to the non-GAAP financial measures in our earnings release.

I'd like to remind you that today's discussion will contain forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, the company's anticipated future revenue, calculated billings, operating performance, gross margin, operating expenses, operating income, net income, free cash flow, dollar-based net retention rate, future hiring decisions, remaining performance obligations, income taxes, earnings per share, our objectives and outlook, our customer response to our products, and our market share and market opportunity.

These statements and other comments are not guarantees of future performance, but rather are subject to risk and uncertainty, some of which are beyond our control. These forward-looking statements apply as of today, and you should not rely on them as representing our views in the future.

We undertake no obligation to update these statements after this call. For a more complete discussion of the risks and uncertainties, please see our filings with the SEC as well as in today's earnings release. I also want to inform you that we'll be attending the following conference in March.

JMP Technology Conference in San Francisco on March 4th, and Morgan Stanley TMT Conference in San Francisco on March 6th. Now I'll turn the call over to Jay..

A U.S. based Energy and Retail company. A Europe based Fortune 500 manufacturing company. A U.S. based Financial Services company, and many more. Moving to our AI cloud, within this portfolio, our newest products Risk360 and Business Insights are growing rapidly.

Business Insights is helping CIOs and CFOs optimize cost of their SaaS applications, office locations, and more. For example, an existing Global 2000 consumer products customer purchased Business Insights for 97, 000 users to replace their home-grown solution that cost over $500, 000 annually.

Recently adopted SEC disclosure requirements and Board level interest in understanding cyber risk are driving demand for Risk360. For example, A Global 2000 manufacturing customer purchased Risk360 for nearly 16, 000 users to automate the process of risk quantification and take proactive measures to reduce cyber risk.

We have already delivered several AI innovations, including ML-based data classification, ML-based policy recommendations, Risk360, Business Insights, and more. In addition, one of the AI products I’m particularly excited about is Breach Predictor.

Breach Predictor is our vision to leverage the power of our platform to predict breaches before customers get breached. We are working relentlessly to bring this and more industry leading AI innovations to our customers this year.

With our innovation engine humming and delivering cutting-edge products, and our go-to-market organization focused on scaling and growth, I’m more excited than ever about the opportunities ahead of us, and our ability to capitalize on those opportunities. Now, I’d like to turn over the call to Remo Canessa for our financial results..

Thank you, Jay. Our Q2 results exceeded our guidance on growth and profitability, even with ongoing customer scrutiny of large deals. Revenue was $525 million, up 35% year-over-year and up 6% sequentially. From a geographic perspective, Americas represented 54% of revenue, EMEA was 31%, and APJ was 15%.

Our total calculated billings in Q2 grew 27% year-over-year to $628 million. On a sequential basis, total billings increased 37% quarter-over-quarter. Our calculated current billings grew 26% year-over-year. Our remaining performance obligations, or RPO, grew 29% from a year ago to $3.613 billion. The current RPO is approximately 51% of the total RPO.

We ended Q2 with 497 customers with greater than $1 million in ARR, adding 29 such customers in the quarter. We also saw strength in $100, 000 ARR customers this quarter, which grew to 2, 820, adding 112 customers sequentially.

This continued strong growth of large customers speaks to the strategic role we play in our customers’ digital transformation initiatives. Our 12-month trailing dollar-based net retention rate was 117%.

While good for our business, our increased success in selling bigger bundles, selling multiple pillars from the start, and faster upsells within a year, can reduce our dollar-based net retention rate in the future. There could be variability in this metric on a quarterly basis due to the factors I just mentioned.

Turning to the rest of our Q2 financial performance, total gross margin of 80.8% compares to 80.7% in the prior quarter and 80.4% in the year-ago quarter. On a year-over-year basis, gross margin benefited by approximately 60 basis points from a change in accounting attributed to the longer useful life of our cloud infrastructure.

As mentioned on our previous earnings call, beginning fiscal 2024, we extended the depreciable useful life of our servers and network equipment in our cloud infrastructure from four to five years. Moving on, our total operating expenses increased 3% sequentially and 22% year-over-year to $321 million.

We continue to generate significant leverage in our financial model, with operating margin reaching 19.6%, an increase of approximately 700 basis points year-over-year. Our free cash flow margin was 19%, including data center CapEx of approximately 6% of revenue.

We ended the quarter with over $2.4 billion in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments. Next, let me share some observations about the macro environment and our framework for guidance for the rest of the fiscal year. We believe we are still operating in a challenging macroenvironment and customers continue to scrutinize large deals.

Customer interest in our platform remains strong, and we are adding experienced sales leaders to our already strong sales team to position us well for sustainable growth in the long-term. In our outlook for fiscal 2024, we're balancing our business optimism with ongoing macroeconomic uncertainties and sales leadership changes.

Moving on to guidance for Q3 and full year fiscal 2024. As a reminder, these numbers are all non-GAAP. For the third quarter, we expect revenue in the range of $534 million to $536 million, reflecting a year-over-year growth of approximately 28%. Gross margins of 80%.

I would like to remind investors that a number of our emerging products, including newer products like ZDX and Zscaler for Workloads, will initially have lower gross margins than our core products. We're currently managing the emerging products for time to market and growth, not optimizing them for gross margins.

Operating profit in the range of $98 million to $100 million. Net other income of $15 million. Income taxes of $10 million. Earnings per share in the range of $0.64 to $0.65, assuming 161 million fully diluted shares. For the full year fiscal 2024, we're increasing our guidance as follows.

Revenue in the range of $2.118 billion to $2.122 billion, reflecting a year-over-year growth of approximately 31%. Calculated billings in the range of $2.55 billion to $2.57 billion or year-over-year growth of 25% to 26%. From a modeling perspective, Q3 is typically our seasonally weaker quarter.

Consistent with our historical seasonal patterns, we expect billings to decline sequentially by approximately 7% in Q3. Operating profit in the range of $395 million to $400 million, which reflects up to 400 basis points of operating margin improvement compared to last year. Income taxes of approximately $35 million.

Earnings per share in the range of $2.73 to $2.77, assuming approximately 161 million fully diluted shares. We expect our free cash flow margin to be up year-over-year and in the low-20% range.

We continue to expect our data center CapEx to be high-single-digit percentage of revenue for the full year, reflecting the 3-percentage points to 4-percentage points of headwind to free cash flow margins.

We expect the timing of CapEx spend to be more towards the later part of the second half of the year as we invest in upgrades to our cloud and AI infrastructure.

With a large market opportunity and customers increasingly adopting the broader platform, we plan to continue to invest significantly to drive long-term growth while increasing profitability.

Before moving on to Q&A, I would like to note that Bill Choi, our Senior Vice President of Strategic Finance and Investors Relations, will be leaving us in a couple of weeks.

This is a bittersweet moment for me, as Bill has been instrumental in building the finance practice here, but happy for him as he is moving to pursue his first CFO opportunity at an AI networking company. We wish him great success in his next endeavor. With that operator, you may now open the call for questions..

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Alex Henderson with Needham..

Well, first off, I've got to say, Bill, it was great working with you and congratulations on progression in your career. As for you guys on Zscaler, nice quarter. Thanks for a good print. The first question I have for you is really against the backdrop of already expected difficult decision making environment.

Has there been any change in deal size, in deal process time, closure rates, win rates over the last quarter that might show some incremental improvement versus where we were in the prior quarter? Are there any green shoots evident in those key metrics?.

Alex, thank you for the question. The short answer is we haven't seen any meaningful change for a number of things you mentioned. Take, for example, macro. It's pretty much a similar environment. Our deals keep on growing. We are doing large deals, so there's no significant crash on deals. We do see demand for cybersecurity products remaining strong.

Customers do have budgets for cyber, even though they may be tightening budget for IT overall. And this is because Zero Trust is a top priority. But it boils down to two things when I talk to lots of CIOs. They do want to take care of cyber. But if you can fix cyber, and reduce cost at the same time, it becomes a much better situation.

Zscaler happens to be in a position where we do it extremely well. If you look at most point products out there, they don't save money. In fact, security generally is a cost. We replace a number of point products, save money, give far better security, as we are sitting in pretty good shape..

Our next question comes from Brad Zelnick with Deutsche Bank..

Great, thanks so much and congrats to you, Bill. It's been a fun ride since the IPO. Jay, just following the last question, I appreciate your comments on the environment. You obviously had one of your key competitors last week talking of customer fatigue and you guys are at least in the federal market.

You're telling us a little bit of a different story but can you specifically share thoughts about competitors giving away free product and the impact it can or is already having on Zscaler and maybe the extent to which you're factoring that into your outlook ahead..

Yes, thank You, Brad. We really do not see any cyber spending fatigue among our customers. In fact many of the CIOs that told me that cyber is a priority for spend. But they do have ELA fatigue because a lot of stuff has been becoming shelf wear and it's being scrutinized.

Regarding free stuff, many vendors have been trying to give it away for a while and we have been successfully winning against this strategy for a long time. I mean look at our retention rate.

It used to be been 90s at IPO now, now it's high 90s and fundamentally cyber is so mission critical that customers will invest in the industry's leading solution rather than rely on cheaper and less effective products that are included as a part of an ELA bundle. Look, we are really dealing with a secular trend too.

Just like the role of data center diminished and public out to a call, similarly, the role of firewalls is diminishing and the demand for Zero Trust security is growing and this is bound to impact sales of firewall vendors and this naturally puts the legacy vendors in a defensive position.

And they're trying to cover giveaway products as bundles which end up becoming shelf wear and this strategy starts to unravel over time. We'll stick to our strategy..

Thanks, Jay, maybe just a quick follow-up one for Remo. Remo on the back half billing seasonality that you've set up now for us, could you just maybe speak to any factors we may want to consider and what it is that drives your confidence, and now it looks like a pretty big sequential Q4 as you've set it up for us. Thank you..

Yes, I mean, we made a go-to-market change during the quarter because you're aware, Mike Rich, Mike has hit the ground running and is doing an absolutely outstanding job, balancing the strength that we've got with our sales organization as well as bringing new leadership in.

If you take a look at our guide for the year, it is slightly up, we're being prudent. The key thing, I think, for our investors to recognize and what Jay said, this is a large market opportunity. It's a huge market opportunity.

And when it's a huge market opportunity, when you look at companies giving away things for free, especially in security, that's one area that basically I wouldn't shortchange. So what we're seeing with the market opportunity, our engagement with our customers, with Mike Rich on board, we feel good about our guidance going forward..

Our next question comes from Andrew Nowinski with Wells Fargo..

Great, thank you, Bill. Certainly going to miss you. Can't wait to see where you land next. And then, overall, just great quarter. Congrats on another strong execution. I wanted to ask you guys about the US federal sector. It sounds like you had some strong upsells in the US Fed may have contributed to some of your upside this quarter.

Do you think some of these agencies that you mentioned that are really under-penetrated, they might serve as a role model to other agencies in the U.S. government which could help you continue your growth there and how does your pipeline look in the U.S. Fed over the next few quarters? Thank you..

As we have been investing in the federal market for quite some time. We got the highest level of certification and we're doing very well. In fact, we are heavily engaged with all federal agencies including DOD, 12 of the 15 agencies on our customers.

In my prepared remarks, I talked about the federal deal that we doubled the number of users and we doubled that ARR to approximately about $5 million. And with this, we are less than 15% penetrated in the agency in terms of the number of users which means there's an 85% wide space to go up there. We feel good.

We keep on investing in it and I think it's a strong area for us.

Remo?.

Well positioned. And as Jay mentioned, 12 to 15 basically agencies that we're in, these are big deals in federal. It's hard to predict when these deals are going to close. From our perspective, we're well positioned, very well positioned going forward.

We've made significant investments with our certifications and also our team, which we feel is outstanding. So the answer to your question, Andy, is we feel good about federal. But, again, bigger type deals, hard to forecast, but we feel good..

Our next question comes from Tal Liani with Bank of America..

Hi, guys. I have a small question and a big question. The small one is about billing. You guide it down 7% sequentially and then guide it up 53% if I take the implied 4Q, which is the highest growth in billing. You had the same problem last year.

What's the meaning of it? What's the meaning of billing being weak and then billing being so strong in the fourth quarter? What needs to happen for it to materialize? So that's a small one.

The bigger one, Jay, maybe you wanted me to take it one at a time or you wanted me just to ask both?.

No, go ahead..

Jay, the second one is a bigger question. SASE is used to be a very secure, a very safe market for you because there were only two players and maybe two and a half players. And now we're seeing tons of competition coming in. And competition is coming at very low pricing. And Fortinet is talking about one-third of your price.

The newcomers are coming either through bundling, which enables them to reduce price, or as an add-on to a firewall, which again enables them to bundle and reduce price.

And if I ask the question in a provocative way, I'll ask it, what prevents this market from turning into what happened to FireEye and what happened to Sandboxing that when competition started, pricing collapsed in the market?.

So, Remo start with you..

So, the things that we've got going on in the third order, first of all, this is our normal range, a much of decline over the last five years from Q2 to Q3. I talked about on a prior question the go-to-market changes that we've made. That certainly plays into things.

Related to the back half in the fourth quarter with the implied increase basically in billing, it's related to pipeline close rates and the forecast that our team has come up with. Again, from our perspective, we feel it's prudent guidance.

We feel good about it, and we feel that we are in a great position to go forward with the team that we have and will build in our sales organization..

Okay, regarding your bigger question, that's SASE, the market and the competition. Let me put it this way. They are point products and the platforms. You absorb point products into platforms. And then there are products that are mission critical, the products that are not mission critical.

FireEye, Sandbox was a feature from day one, it’s not a much barrier to entry. Everyone could build it and add it into the main platform. CASB was a point product all along, became that way. Cloud Security Boston Management, a point product gets bundled with something. And then there's something called platform.

For example, the code of our platform, Zero Trust Architecture proxy based, sitting in line, inspecting traffic, and you add things to it. So it's almost like ERP. You see lots of product going out in many areas. Customers don't remove and put in an ERP for vendor A or vendor B because somebody feels like I need to enter the ERP space.

I think SASE market is almost like that. This is so mission critical. All traffic goes through us. In fact, a CIO told me, Jay, Zscaler is more mission critical than Microsoft Office 365 because you must work all the time. So with that in mind, our customers may look at this thing. Price is a secondary factor.

Reliability, availability, and effectiveness of doing cyber protection is an important factor. My customers also tell me that they have so many firewalls, so many VPNs, and the threats are growing so the credibility of firewall vendors overall is less. Maybe I can use another analogy.

You want to buy a pacemaker; you don't try to cut corner and buy one at sale. You want to buy something else, yes, you may be able to do so. Yes, competition is coming. We see that, but I can tell you some of the new firewall vendors that announced the SASE act entrance, I haven't come across them in the recent months as I've seen out there.

I think the platform keeps on growing. We started with outbound traffic, now inbound traffic. The platform must have the most comprehensive data protection. None of these firewall vendors can do a lot of data protection. Data protection starts with the proper SASE architecture. Then we moved on to expand to workloads, to IoT/OT, and on to B2B.

And the pace of innovation is kept on going. I'm very comfortable with our platform story. We need to keep on focusing on go-to-market to keep on going faster and faster. I hope that helps..

Our next question comes from Rob Owens with Piper Sandler..

Great. Thanks for taking my question this afternoon. Could you touch a little bit more on your vertical selling motion and maybe some of those new markets that you will have special overlays for? And I would love a little more commentary around your success with your IoT/OT solution. Thanks..

Yes, so let's start with vertical market first. About five or six years ago, we started with a first vertical. That was a public sector. And then within that vertical, we expanded into federal government and state government, education and the like. And those things have been very successful for us. For a year ago, we expanded to health care verticals.

And then now we want to expand to a couple of more verticals. When company gets to a certain level, you can actually afford to go vertical because vertical requires a decent amount of footprint. Vertical requires some of the expertise in those areas.

For example, we have hired some people who come from very good backgrounds, who have spent time in those vertical markets. So we think it's a good natural area for us to expand. And it's not a new, something totally new for us. We've been there, done it, we need to know, we need to learn how to expand it.

For example, financial is a strong market for us. It's almost like a vertical today, though it's not a formal vertical. So we'll see, you'll see us expanding in more verticals. That was the first part. The second part of the question, what was the second part..

Our next question comes from Matthew Hedberg with RBC..

Yes, thank you. This is actually Matt Swanson from that Hedberg. I wanted to follow up on Andy's earlier question on the federal vertical. Yes, it's been a place that's been a little bit mixed among your peers and with the strong results, is anything change from your perspective from a competitive standpoint? Or you mentioned the Zero Trust mandates.

Are there things that are changing the federal government that are leaving this scaler better positioned relative to some of your peers that maybe have seen a little weakness in that vertical?.

We have seen no weakness, no slowdown in the federal market. In fact, adoption of Zero Trust keeps on growing, especially under the president's mandate. So all agencies, whether federal government, civilian side, or defense side, we have strong engagements and we feel very good about it.

But as Remo said, some of these deals can be big and lumpy, but we are in good shape. And the certifications we got at the highest level for all products puts us in an especially very good position and our strong sales team in place..

Our next question comes from Fatima Boolani with Citi..

Hello. This is Mark on for Fatima. Thanks for taking our questions. Can you maybe just speak up a little bit more on the leverage you guys recognize in this quarter, and then really the meaningful to the on margin expansion, even though there's a pretty long roster of initiatives you guys is looking to implement, such as verticalization.

So any sorts of leverage performance this quarter, and how does sort of your investment stance or philosophy differ today versus maybe three months ago? Thank you..

Mark, it's actually very hard to hear you. So what I picked up was you were asking about a little more information about our vertical approach.

Is that correct?.

Can you hear me now?.

A little better..

A little better, yes..

Okay, great. Sorry about that. So we were just more so wondering, can you maybe speak a little bit more on the leverage you guys recognize this quarter, and then maybe the meaningful to on the margin expansion. We know that there's a lot of initiatives you guys are looking to implement, such as verticalization.

So we just wanted to get a sense of the source of leverage performance this quarter, and how does your investment philosophy basically differ today versus three months ago, and going forward. Thank you..

So I'll take that you. I believe, Mark, you're talking about operating leverage. So we exceeded in revenue. Our gross margins were higher, and our operating expenses came lower. Having said that, we did hire significantly during the quarter, and we'll continue to hire as we go forward.

The key thing I think to really think about Zscaler is that we are early in this market. We have a model which we've talked about in the past that we can leverage related to operating profitability and free cash flow. We've shown 700 basis points increase and operating profitability on a year-over-year basis. In one way that's great.

And another way is we need to continue to invest. So our focus is still growth. We'll be mindful and manage your operating profitability and free cash flow. But this is a huge market opportunity. And quite frankly with Mike Rich on board and our focus that we're going to have towards large accounts and penetrating large accounts.

What we talked about is that we have a 6x opportunity in our existing install-based upsell new products. And also when you take a look at the penetration of the market it's in the teens probably that Zscaler has. So large market opportunity, the ability to leverage upwards profitability and free cash flow.

When you take a look at our contribution margin in years two and three, it's over 60%. A lot of levers we can pull. And so we feel good about where we are. We're going to continue to invest and we will manage our operating profitability. But again, I'm not concerned about hitting our operating profitability targets or free cash flow.

Our model is well-built, especially with 80% gross margins to do that.

Jay, anything to contribute?.

No, right and clear..

Our next question comes from Roger Boyd with UBS..

Thanks for taking the questions. And Bill, first off, congrats. I think pretty much summarized the best when you call it a bittersweet moment.

But, Jay, I was wondering if you could expand on how you're approaching SD-WAN and single-vendor SASE market, really how that approach differs from traditional vendors there and how you see this changing your competitive standpoint in the market for security edge in general. Thanks..

Yes. So we have always wanted to make sure we deliver Zero Trust solutions. SD-WAN was a good technology because it was cheaper. But D-WAN nothing for security. SD-WAN enabled the same lateral movement that the previous networks did. So, but our customers do want to simply file branches. So, they've been talking to us.

We launched our Zero Trust for Branch solution a few months ago, and then actually there's a January, the second release of that. So with that, we actually are making available a plug-in play appliance that you simply ship, you drop in the branch, you plug in the internet, and it's auto-discovered, and in 15 minutes it's up and running.

No route papers to manage, no Zero Trust architecture makes it wonderful. So our customers are very excited about it. So really, so that is our Zero Trust SD-WAN, it's not traditional SD-WAN. So combined with our SSE and Zero Trust, so we are actually offering the full SASE solution for the first time in the market, Zero Trust SASE solution.

I can tell you the number of customers who are eager and ready to roll it out is very large. We're already working with a number of customers, but over the coming quarters, I'm very bullish with the success of this new offering. And it has the full potential to disrupt traditional SD-WANs and traditional SASEs as well..

Our next question comes from Brian Essex with JPMorgan..

Great. Good afternoon, and thank you for taking the question. First of all, Bill, congratulations from me as well. It's great to see your success. Maybe Jay for you.

So we've seen a little bit of executive turnover here as we watch the story from the sidelines, and would love to get your sense of, and obviously some of these make a lot of sense, right? People come as a team, who believe as a team, there are relationships there, and you did a great job previously calling it out as being a factor of conservatism in your outlook.

So maybe two quarter for me. One has turnover been what you expected it to be, particularly given what you've kind of like folded into your guidance and then two, maybe frame out what kind of or how deep and meaningful some organizational changes that Mike Rich might be driving within the organization. Thank you..

Okay, good. So starting with our sales attrition is down in the quarter. And second, when leaders leave, it's natural for some people to follow. But as Zscaler has become a very big brand. We have become a top destination for top talent. And we are no short in attracting some of the best and the brightest sales leader and account manager in the market.

Mike has built and he continues to build a strong team that includes many, many good leaders. Now, when it comes to organization changes, as we mentioned last time, we are evolving our sales model. There's no wholesale any meaning significant change.

We years ago, we had to move to top down conference selling at the sea level because that's what drives transformation. Remember I said, when I used to go and sell two box huggers, they would kind of say, please go away. So our process has been top down. It has been strategic. It's aligned with the background, white, broad form.

So we have been doing a lot of that stuff, our business value assessment and topic count stuff and stuff. So these are evolutionary changes. And they're not really, they're no large basket change across. So we're pretty comfortable in evolving from where we are to get to where we need to go..

Our next question comes from Peter Levine with Evercore ISI..

Great. Thank you for taking my question and Bill congrats on the opportunity. Two parts.

One, can you maybe help us understand where NRR maybe troughs out, where you see that trending throughout ‘24, perhaps into fiscal ‘25? And then Jay, you had comments and maybe piggyback of last question on opportunity centric to more of an account centric sales motion.

Maybe explain to us what that means and who kind of somewhat appreciated that change..

Yes. I'll answer the NRR question and Jay can answer the opportunity question. So we don't guide the NRR and quite frankly we only look at NRR at the end of each quarter. So we're not providing any guidance in NRR. It can be impacted as we called out on the script related to large deals or more being bought up front, customers buying within the quarter.

So, it is a metric that's it's going to move around. But again, we do not provide any guidance on NRR..

Okay. The second part, opportunity-centric versus account-centric. In an opportunity-centric model, the rep normally engages on a tactical basis, the customers are all being, where is my opportunity, where's the deal, let me brought the deal. In the account-centric sale, we create account plans, we focus on growing the account.

Now, when you are a young company, you don't have that many customers. You naturally are opportunity-centric and it serves you well. At our stage, there will be a large number of customers. It is important for us to move towards being account-centric. We have a large platform to sell.

So, once we land, working with account, creating a joint plan to expand becomes far more effective. And as we scale to $5 billion ARR and beyond, so it's evolving to really become long-term strategic partner with the customer. We have been doing it at a small scale in some pockets of the business. Now, we want to take it across at a larger scale..

Our next question comes from Gregg Moskowitz with Mizuho..

Hey, thank you very much. Bill, congrats to you. It's been a pleasure. I have a question for either Jay or Remo. Some investors are harping just a bit on short-term billing, slowing down a little this quarter. But conversely, based on my numbers, both RPO bookings and CRPO bookings actually accelerated this quarter, which is impressive.

So just to level set for all of us, because we know that these metrics can sometimes be a little noisy, is there any incremental slowdown that you have observed in any facet in the Q2 or any change in the level of execution? Thank you..

First of all RPO, CRPO is based on contracted value. And again, those did very well. Billings is actually what's being built. So there's always going to be differences between CRPO and RPO versus short-term billings and in billings.

As the company gets bigger, it's just the numbers are growing, but the numbers are, you're not going to get the type of growth rates when four or five years ago. But again, from my perspective, the short-term billings growth rate of 26%, that's very good. That's outstanding..

Our next question comes from Keith Bachman with BMO..

Hi, many thanks. Good evening. Remo, I wanted to start with you, if I could. I wanted to turn the federal comments around a little bit. Your federal business has been very strong for a number of different quarters. And in the past, you've actually provided some context of growth on the federal standalone.

And I just wanted to see if you could revisit that. And the lens that I'm putting on the question is, there's been some investor concern that your federal business has been outstanding. And yet, that would suggest a that there's been a more, a greater slowdown, if you will, on the corporate business.

So I just wanted to see if you could provide any context for that. And then Jay, perhaps for you, you actually in your prepared remarks talked about, I think you said one half of your net new bookings were from new logos, if I heard you correctly, which is a very strong metric.

And I just wondered if you could characterize how, you see that unfolding new logos in particular, as you look out over the next number of quarters. Thank you very much and congrats to Bill..

Keith, I'll start. The federal business has been good for us, because as I mentioned, we're well positioned. We'll provide color on the contribution of federal on an annual basis. I haven't said that. I'll go out and put my neck out, which maybe I should..

Bill's leaving so it's safe..

With Bill's leaving, that's right. He's picking me at the table. We're well positioned in federal. It really comes down to our executions. Let the numbers play the way they play. We'll see how it plays through. But we feel good about our federal business. It's been strong. I would not say it's been carrying us. That's the key comment.

But it is basically a vertical that I see that we have a lot of potential. We just need to execute..

Yes, and non-federal is pretty good, too..

So, I mean, we are bullish, but both sides of the business. Moving on to the second part, yes, business, strong business coming from net new logos. It's good in terms of future. And as customer base is getting bigger and bigger. And we have lots of platforms to sell.

From a directional point of view, I think we have been planning the upsell being in the, whatever, 60%, 65% range somewhere else there Remo, and new logo, the rest. So I think that's really how we see us moving forward. Now, part of the thing that I'm excited about is we are seeing more and more of million-dollar customers being on board.

The number is about almost 500 customers that are a million dollars. Then they are trying to get to $5 million and $10 million. So we are targeting towards getting more and more customers a $1 million to $5 million to $10 million. That's probably the bigger target than trying to get lots of new logos by count of logos..

Our next question comes from Joshua Tilton with Wolfe research..

Hey, guys, can you hear me? Congrats, Bill, and I apologize for the amazing cafe music in the background. But the one question I have that's been on my mind is just none of what you guys are talking about tonight kind of happens overnight.

So I guess, were these sales changes factored into the initial guidance that you gave back in Q4? Or are you actually embedding incremental services and related to these changes in the outlook going forward?.

I'll speak to basically both Q2 and Q3. In Q2, we said we were expecting close rates to be slightly worse. Things came in pretty much as we thought they would. For Q3, our assumption also there's a level of conservatism slight. Again, for Q3, they're related to close rates..

And we'll have our last question from the line of Peter Weed with A.B. Bernstein..

Thank you. And I guess following up, maybe a couple of questions that we've had here, I mean, I will agree impressive to see the continued acceleration and new customer contribution. I think that had been a worry maybe a year ago whether or not that was going to continue.

And obviously you've talked a little bit about expansion coming down with landing orders or deals up front leaving a little bit less upsell, cross-sell opportunity. Maybe help break down a couple of things.

One is with a lot more new customers landing in the short term, would this be a good signal for kind of a year from now and in the short term getting some lift just because newer customers expand more.

And secondly, how would you think about the opportunity around expansion? Like what are the things that you think you can do to grow the upsell opportunity even though customers are landing larger today? What are you going to be doing to kind of create some lift there with expansion in the future?.

Yes, so if you think about what we've done over the past several years since our IPO, we essentially used to start with, in fact, the ZIA, mostly business. They would ask, what about transformation? Then what about next? When ZPA came in great expansion, CDX came in, a number of new products have been coming in.

So we are actually able to expand quite a bit. In fact, even today, as we said in our current customer base, we could literally take our ARR by 6x if we sold all these growth user products to our customers. So even I would even say we have no lack of product to sell. And customers are embracing broader and broader platform.

If you look at all that deals, they use that talk about, reading the script and say, huh, CIS, EPS, EDX and data protection. And so it is becoming pretty significant. So we have a big, big upsell opportunities, things like data protection. They don't want to go with someone else to do data protection if the traffic is going through our platforms.

So that's one piece. And the second piece is everyone is talking about only users when they talk about Zero Trust safety or they talk about whatever safety. That's only one piece. Then you talk about how about workloads? That's a bigger opportunity. IoT/OT is a sigma opportunity.

B2B, where your customer, suppliers and partners need to access information through our Zero Trust platform. So I think there's a big opportunity on the product side, on the sales side, we keep on learning and refining some of the stuff. We do have some of the overlay specialists.

We don't do overlay sales per se, but there are specialists in certain areas because you need to be able to go deeper. So we are definitely taking advantage of that. We are pleased with the results, but we'll keep on tweaking and refining to get better and better results..

And the new customer success that you've been having, do you anticipate that provides some additional lift kind of looking at a year or so, just as a mix of new customers has increased?.

We don't wait for a year or two years for the contract. We are in the process of we sell, we go, we talk. Literally, it's an ongoing engagement with the customers. So you're not going to see lumpy things from our us.

Like people said, hey after COVID what's going to happen after three years? When three years came in most of our customers had done an upsell or two with us..

That concludes the question and answer session. This time I would like to turn it back to Jay Chaudhry for closing remarks..

Well, thank you for your interest in Zscaler. We look forward to seeing you at one of the investor conferences. Thanks..

Thank you..

Thank you for your participation in today's conference. This does conclude the program. You may now disconnect..