Steven Gitlin - Vice President of Marketing Strategy and Communications Timothy E. Conver - Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President and Member of Executive Committee Jikun Kim - Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Senior Vice President Tom Herring - Chief Operating Officer and Senior Vice President.

Omear Khalid - Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Research Division Andrea James - Dougherty & Company LLC, Research Division Peter J. Arment - Sterne Agee & Leach Inc., Research Division Josephine Lin Millward - The Benchmark Company, LLC, Research Division Howard A.

Rubel - Jefferies LLC, Research Division Kevin Ciabattoni - KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc., Research Division Patrick J. McCarthy - FBR Capital Markets & Co., Research Division Brian W. Ruttenbur - CRT Capital Group LLC, Research Division.

Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and thank you for standing by, and welcome to AeroVironment Incorporated's First Quarter Fiscal 2014 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this call is being recorded for replay purposes. With us today from the company is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Mr.

Tim Conver; Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Jikun Kim; Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Tom Herring; and Vice President of Investor Relations, Mr. Steven Gitlin. And now, I'd like to turn the call over to Mr. Gitlin. Please go ahead, sir..

Thank you very much, Huey. Welcome to AeroVironment's first quarter fiscal year 2014 earnings call. Please note that on this call, certain information presented contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, forecasts and assumptions that involve risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, economic, competitive, governmental and technological factors outside of our control that may cause our business, strategy or actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements.

For a list and description of such risks and uncertainties, see the reports we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date on which they are made.

We do not intend and undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. The content of this conference call contains time-sensitive information that is accurate only as of today, August 27, 2013.

The company undertakes no obligation to make any revision to the statements contained in our remarks, or to update them to reflect the events or circumstances occurring after this conference call. We'll now begin with remarks from Tim Conver.

Tim?.

Thank you, Steven. Good afternoon, and welcome to our first quarter 2014 conference call. On today's call, I'll update you on our Q1 performance and then review the status of our top priorities for the year and highlights for the quarter.

Jikun will provide a detailed financial review, and then I'll review our growth strategy and work outlook for the year before Tom Herring, Jikun and I take questions. Now let's begin with Q1. The quarter finished about as expected. We're making good progress on our near-term priorities, and we're on track for the year.

First quarter revenue of $44.1 million was in line with our expectations, which assumed continued contracting delays and was consistent with the guidance we provided on our Q4 fiscal '13 call. The loss per share was $0.32.

The quarterly operating loss of $7.1 million was largely due to the lower level of revenue and one-time expenses associated with our workforce reduction in May. The fluctuating value of our CybAero investment contributed to the balance of the loss as other expense.

Jikun will go into more detail, but our forward break-even run rate is where we expect it to be. Our funded backlog increased by 29% over the last quarter to $77 million, increasing our visibility for the balance of the year to about 77% of the midpoint of our revenue guidance range.

These Q1 orders reflect ongoing demand for our existing business areas in both UAS and EES. Contracting delays continue. The previously delayed orders are being released as you saw with the recently announced receipt of the final portion of the government fiscal '12 Raven contract that we had expected in Q3 of last year. Moving on from Q1 results.

I discussed 3 priorities for the year in our Q4 earnings call, and I want update you on their status. First, a sustained focus on staying #1 with our customers. We're maintaining our attention firmly on our current customers, continuing to deliver unique value in finding new ways to support and grow with them.

Our market share serves as the definitive metric for our performance against this priority, and across our business it remains high.

Sequestration and other government budget uncertainties continue to drive contracting delays in the near-term, but our high market share in UAS is important for supporting the long-term priority of UAS for our government customers. Second, winning and executing on key growth opportunities.

We're making investments, and we're achieving continuous progress on key adoption and revenue objectives for this year, including Switchblade, international small UAS and electric vehicle solutions. New orders for mission services are also a key objective for the year. Following is an update on those objectives.

Support for Switchblade has continued this quarter in the form of ongoing development in small volume system procurement. This sustained early adoption supports our expectations for growing revenue this year. Our next objective is accelerated adoption.

In terms of international small UAS, we received initial orders from a new customer in Q1 and follow-on orders from previous customers. Additionally, we were pleased to announce our teaming agreement with Dynamatic Technologies in India.

This represents a new pathway to international expansion that could provide a model for our future international growth. In mission services, you will recall that the United States Department of State canceled its UAV services request for quotations, or RFQ, in mission services in May.

And at that time, we expected a revised RFQ in the first half of fiscal '14. This month, the Department of State did release a new request for information, or RFI, for Tier 1 UAV services indicating a continued requirement for mission services acquisition. We believe that we are uniquely positioned to satisfy their needs.

In our EES business, plug-in electric vehicle sales are up quarter-over-quarter. And we have now completed delivery of more than 13,000 Level 2 charge docks and more than 300 DC quick chargers in North America.

This month, Chrysler Fiat contracted with AV as the preferred supplier of charging infrastructure for the launch of the highly rated 500E in North America, broadening a set of important similar OEM relationships with Nissan, Mitsubishi BMW and Ford. Our third priority for this year is ensuring profitability.

Last year, government budget uncertainty led to contract delays, which resulted in a significant decline in revenue. By the end of our Q4, it was clear that those delays would continue, which led us to project flat fiscal '14 revenue compared to last year.

We took action early in Q1 to lower our break-even revenue level to $50 million to $55 million in order to achieve our planned profitability, while maintaining the ability to execute effectively on our key new growth initiatives. We will maintain cost control throughout the year and have plans in place to continue improving operational effectiveness.

We can also inflect -- flex investments if we can accelerate growth opportunities. We have always managed the business with a focus on a return on operating assets. And to that end, we expect to reduce the inventory built up last year as we ship hardware against contracts that had been delayed.

Few other highlights from and since Q1 have strengthened our market position, our team and the probability of executing our long-term growth plan. First, in July, our Puma AE received the first and only FAA-type certification for a hand-launched, unmanned aircraft system. This is a significant breakthrough.

For the first time, our certified small UAS can now operate in national airspace for commercial purposes. Second, on the innovation front, we announced the new long-endurance Puma with a 9-hour flight, enabled by a new system upgrade with a new wing, a new battery pack and advanced solar cells.

This is a breakthrough in flight endurance for small unmanned airplane systems, and it signals the potential for a long endurance Puma to address a broader set of applications, including a portion of the larger Tier 2 UAS market. Third, we strengthened our team.

At the beginning of Q2, Doug Scott, former General Counsel with SAIC, joined us as our Senior Vice President and General Counsel. Steve Bloch joined our EES segment as Vice President of Sales from Eaton. Curtis Chestnut joined us as VP of UAS business development from Boeing. And Nigel Sutton joined us from Raytheon as Vice President UAS International.

These new leaders join our strong team and expand our capacities to stay #1 with our customers, and win key growth opportunities. With that as an overview of the quarter, I'll now turn the call over to Jikun Kim for a review of our financial performance..

Thank you, Tim, and good afternoon, everyone. AeroVironment FY '14 Q1 results are as follows. Revenue for the first quarter was $44.1 million, a decrease of 25% over Q1 last year of $58.7 million. Looking at revenue by segment. UAS revenue was $35.2 million, a decrease of 28% over the prior year.

Year-over-year, revenue declines were driven by lower service revenues of $15.9 million, driven by a reduction in DDL retrofit activities of our Raven B systems and lower product deliveries of $1.6 million, due to the delay of a GFY '12 Raven funding. However, these decreases were offset by higher customer funded R&D revenues of $3.9 million.

Key drivers of this increase were higher Switchblade program activity and a contract settlement funding for the Global Observer JCTD contract. EES revenue was $8.9 million, a decrease of 10% from Q1 last year, primarily due to decreased deliveries of our passenger electric vehicle charging systems and Electric Vehicle Test Systems.

This was partially offset by increased deliveries of our industrial electric vehicle charging systems. Turning to gross margin. Gross margin in the first quarter was $12.5 million, down 36% from the first quarter last year. Gross margin, as a percent of revenue, was 28% versus 33% in the first quarter last year.

2 key components of the reduced gross profit percentage were the severance and compensation -- I'm sorry, were the severance and compensation expenditures related to the reduction in force we incurred in Q1, as well as lower overall volumes generating less overhead absorption.

By segment, UAS gross margin was $10.6 million down 34% from the first quarter last year. As a percent of revenue, UAS gross margin was 30% down 3 points, compared to the first quarter last year. EES gross margin was $1.9 million, down 44% from the first quarter last year.

As a percent of revenue, EES gross margin was 22%, down 13 points, compared to the first quarter last year. SG&A investment for the quarter was $12.5 million, compared to $13.6 million in the prior year, representing a $1.2 million reduction.

R&D investment for the quarter was $7.2 million, compared to the prior year amount of $8.1 million, representing a $900,000 reduction. Operating loss for the quarter was $7.1 million or negative 16% of revenue.

Operating losses were driven by lower sales volumes and higher expenses related to the reduction in force action but were also offset by lower SG&A and R&D investments. Other expenses for the quarter was $3.4 million generated by the unrealized loss in the CybAero convertible notes.

The effective tax benefit rate for the quarter was 30% versus the prior year tax benefit rate of 33.4%. Net loss for the quarter was $7.2 million or $0.32 loss per share, compared to a loss of $1.4 million or $0.06 loss per share in the same quarter last year.

The decline in the fair value of the CybAero convertible notes and the reduction-in-force-related expenditures reduced Q1 EPS by $0.11 and $0.06, respectively. Looking at backlog. Funded backlog at the end of the first quarter was $76.9 million, up $17.5 million or 29% from April 30, 2013. Turning to our balance sheet.

Cash equivalents and investments at the end of the first quarter totaled $196.4 million, down $21.1 million from the prior quarter. This was-driven primarily by higher working capital needs, net loss for the quarter and capital expenditures.

Turning to receivables, at the end of the first quarter, our accounts receivables, including unbilled receivables, totaled $29.3 million, down $1.8 million from the prior quarter. Total days sales outstanding were approximately 60 days, compared to 52 days at the end of the prior quarter. Taking a look at inventories.

Inventories were $68.7 million at the end of the quarter, up $6.1 million from the end of the prior quarter. Total days in inventory were approximately 196 days compared to 155 days at the end of the prior quarter. Turning to capital expenditures.

In the first quarter, we invested approximately $4.5 million or 10% of revenue in property improvements and capital equipment. We recognize approximately $2.2 million of depreciation during the quarter. Now an update to our FY '14 visibility.

As of today, Q1 actual revenues to-date of $44 million, Q1 ending backlog that we can execute in FY '14 of $72 million, final increment of the GFY '12 that we booked in early Q2 of $13.5 million of the orders we have booked to date in Q2 of $8 million, incremental revenues to hold EES revenues flat of $28 million and a portion of the GFY '13 budget line items that we expect in our FY '14 of $18 million.

This makes the total FY '14 revenue visibility of $184 million or 77% at midpoint of revenue guidance. Now I'd like to turn things back to Tim to discuss AV's expectations for the balance of our FY '14..

"The ability to wave off a target after launch is unique to this weapon system over almost all other weapons, and soldiers and leaders have readily embraced it as an invaluable tool." LMAMS is expected to be an enduring Army need with a program of record projected for 2016.

Future combined demand for tactical missile systems could be in the thousands of units per year, representing a 9-figure market opportunity. Pursuing and executing this opportunity could require tens of millions of dollars of investment in capital expenditures for manufacturing scale and capacity.

To take a broad perspective of this new market, the U.S. Department of Defense is requesting $6.7 billion for missiles in the fiscal 2014 budget, of which tactical missiles are a component.

Each of our current product lines transitioned from an innovation to the early adoption stage to a sustained production business after a significant upward inflection in the adoption curve took place. We think we are close to that point on Switchblade now.

We believe customer consensus has solidified around a much larger demand for operational Switchblade systems, or in other words, accelerated adoption. Contracts for significantly higher production volumes would go a long ways to filling our revenue visibility for the year, in addition to solidifying Switchblade as a new growth business area.

The second growth opportunity I'll discuss is international UAS. We already have 25 international government customers for our small unmanned airplane systems, and we believe this market will grow significantly over the next 5 years.

We are delivering the same family of small UAS to international customers that has made us the leading supplier to the Department of Defense. This approach has proved to be a strong competitive advantage in this expanding market and supports our belief that international revenue will continue to grow this year and beyond.

As the local demand from individual countries grows significantly, governments will increasingly value domestic production. To address this customer preference, we expect to invest more in developing business relationships with international customers and partners, and in meeting their local content needs.

Initial and sustaining investments, as well as long-term returns from this business model should be similar to our history for domestic small UAS, but just involving more customers. Third, mission services is a growth opportunity where we intend to own and operate the UAS assets to provide situational awareness to customers as a service.

In this model, we will be a vertically integrated supplier of the service and the UAS, and the asset cost will be amortized into the service price. The U.S. Department of States' mission service requirements represents a cornerstone opportunity for this business area.

The RFI on August 12 for UAV services was important in reconfirming their acquisition intention. We still expect this contract can be awarded in the second half of our fiscal year. However, this RFI provides no updated information on contract value.

The investments required to be successful in this service model are different from those required to sell UAS products. AeroVironment will be required to invest upfront to capitalize UAS systems.

The assets' terms will be lower than the production business and will require early capital deployment to fully exploit the growth potential of our service offering.

Our ongoing investments in Puma AE have improved our strong competitive position to support this Department of State requirement and for the broader mission services opportunity beyond it.

Fourth, we continue to pursue Global Observer because we believe it could deliver dramatically more cost-effective capability to deliver high demand communications and seamless ISR in multiple applications, and thereby drive dramatic growth for us. Annual U.S.

Military bandwidth demand for commercial satellite service alone is projected to grow to $3 billion to $5 billion in the next 15 years. Because the concept of an atmospheric satellite is such a major paradigm shift, the timing of adoption of this game-changing innovation is one of the hardest for us to predict.

The required investment to enable a large production Global Observer program, whether adopted as mission services or as a platform solution, would be very high, but the return on investment is one of the highest we're pursuing. Fifth, AUVSI has sized the United States' commercial market for UAS at $82 billion from 2015 to 2025.

This market potential has been gated by access to national airspace, but it appears to beginning to open up. As I discussed earlier, we are an early leader in FAA-type certification. We have seen strong support from early adopters, including the oil industry and in public safety.

With over 40,000 local fire and law enforcement agencies throughout the United States alone, these commercial applications are clearly an important growth opportunity. And 2015 appears to be a reasonable estimate for revenue acceleration in this emerging market.

A capture of this opportunity will require AV to invest in domestic and international sales and distribution channels, product design refinements to meet unique customer needs and the manufacturing scale and capacity.

Initial and sustaining investments and returns for this business model most likely will be very similar to the ones we currently have for domestic small UAS. The sixth growth initiative is in our EES business.

More plug-in models are now in automotive showrooms and even more on the way, pulled by consumer demand, supported by governments, and pushed by CAFE standards. We are a leading supplier of EV charging solutions in North America, and we plan to maintain that position as the market grows.

We estimate that a 5% penetration of annual auto sales and plug-in electric vehicles could drive an annual charging infrastructure total available market of nearly $1 billion in the United States and more than $2 billion outside the United States.

A successful strategy here requires critical insights into the needs of automotive OEMs, utilities and consumers and a coherent solution that optimizes for the needs of all 3. Product and business innovation has bought us a market-leading position for EV charging.

Our balance sheet has been essential in gaining access and success with automotive OEMs to date. Our ability to quickly deploy capital to capture and grow along with our customers will remain important in maintaining our market position relative to much larger competitors as the EV-charging market grows.

Many of these 6 growth opportunities could dramatically increase our revenue. Even modest success in the initiatives that have already achieved initial adoption can drive long-term, double-digit growth.

It's difficult to accurately predict the size, the timing and the rate of adoption required to mature these opportunities into large-scale revenue generators. However, a recent real example of the now canceled Department of State competition might help put these opportunities in better perspective.

Our proposal committed us to respond to a maximum demand level that, if exercised, could require over $80 million in capital expenditures, inventory, R&D and start-up expenses in the first year. If you remember, a service business requires AV to capitalize upfront the unmanned airplane system and the support equipment assets.

The sales potential from that investment could have doubled our UAS revenue, as well as moderated the lumpy nature of AV's product, orders and sales. We originally planned for this contract to be awarded last November, a fact that puts the need for timing, flexibility and persistence in pursuing these opportunities into context.

While timing of these growth opportunities are uncertain, we do know that we are at the leading edge of each one, inventing the category in some cases. Success will require persistence, agility, delivering sustained customer value and assuring customer confidence that we can meet our commitments.

Our outlook and our timing for fiscal 2014 remain the same as described in our Q4 fiscal 2013 earnings release. That is $230 million to $250 million in revenue and $0.35 to $0.50 diluted operating earnings per share. To summarize, we're on track for the year.

Even though we continue to face contract delays, we are controlling our costs, managing our assets and maintaining our market share. We are making progress on our major growth opportunities that target long-term demand for unmanned airplane systems, tactical missile systems and electric vehicle infrastructure.

Our business model and capital structure are aligned with our strategy for long-term growth. Thank you for your continued interest in AV. We appreciate the open dialogue you have maintained with us, and we invite your questions..

And before we turn to the Q&A portion of today's call, I'd like to remind everyone that the purpose of today's call is to discuss our first quarter results and the initiatives we've just outlined. We thank you in advance for limiting your questions to this topic. We'll now open the call for questions.

Huey?.

[Operator Instructions] And our first question on the phone will come from the line of Noah Poponak with Goldman Sachs..

This is Omear Khalid for Noah. Just a quick question, following up on your prepared remarks regarding the UAS -- the commercial UAS market.

Since you mentioned that -- you described the total available opportunity potentially as estimated by a third-party provider but how quickly do you think things can move from a commercial adoption perspective once the approval [ph] Is granted approximately in 2015?.

Well, the market size, as you point out, that we referred to, was the national association that -- one of them that focuses in this market. And I think your point on transition to adoption in a new market is one that we should all pay a lot of attention to.

I've noted probably more times than you wanted to hear during this conversation and most others I've had, that predicting the timing and the rate of adoption of an innovation in a new market is difficult. Having said that, they -- that market study focused on a revenue between 2015 and 2025.

And judging from the required timing of the FAA rulemaking, the current progress that we're seeing in that area and the early adopter appetite for this capability, it does seem to me that looking at 2015 as an opportunity for revenue acceleration is reasonable to expect..

Just another quick follow-up. Again, you mentioned in your prepared remarks about the release of delayed orders from the DoD.

But is there any additional color that can you provide us regarding the type and the quality of your communication with the DoD contracting officers? And any other insight that you guys have gained regarding the future, how they might unfold and award contracts here in the current year?.

Well, we have a strong line of communication that we have had and we maintain with our customers, including the -- to the degree it's appropriate, with our -- the contracting officers in our customer organizations.

I think we clearly see a continuation of this propensity for delay that's driven by the high level of budget uncertainty across the entire department. I think that's associated with the entire enterprise and not with any specific program or any specific office.

So while we maintain a close contact with our customers, I believe that it's difficult for them to predict precisely what the timing that they'll be able to support is in many cases..

Our next questioner in queue comes from the line of Andrea James with Dougherty & Company..

Just in the EES business, it was down year-over-year and the gross margins fell. And I was just wondering if you could just give us a sense of what's behind the year-over-year change..

Yes. So from a revenue standpoint, I think in the prepared remarks, we had discussed the Electric Vehicle Test Systems being a little light compared to last year.

And then on the gross profit side, the severance expenses that we incurred, a lot of that did get allocated into EES and you're seeing an amplification of the gross profit percentage as a result of that..

Okay, so that moderates after. And for my follow-up, can you talk about the FAA and the commercial market opportunity in the U.S.? And I was just wondering, do you guys look at the international opportunity at all? I've read about drones being used in mining and ag uses in other countries..

We do, Andrea. And there are other countries that have moved their rulemaking more rapidly than we have here in the United States. We have operated our family of systems in applications in other countries with significant customers. We believe that the commercial market for UAS will be global.

And we are looking at opportunities not only domestically but internationally as well..

Our next questioner in queue comes from Peter Arment with Sterne Agee..

Tim, I guess my question really is to get a little more color behind -- Jikun laid out you kind of are at the 70% -- 77% of your kind of revenue target range going into your second quarter.

How should we think about the delta or the whitespace being made up? Do you see it from international as you were just discussing in general or is it some other products? Or whether we're just seeing some additional bookings from the core Raven or Puma opportunity?.

So I think we will continue to see new orders from our core products in both segments. And I believe, last call, we stated we thought we would see incremental growth and -- from Switchblade and international UAS, as well as the EES segment on the electric vehicle charging products. And I think that's pretty much the view that we maintain right now..

And it -- does that incorporate also kind of -- how long of a continuing resolution do you kind of bake into your revenue guidance range?.

Well, until we see a change, we're continuing to assume an environment of delayed contracts that's driven by the uncertainty around government in general and DoD in particular funding in the near term. So I'm not assuming any optimistic change in that environment until we see it actually happen..

Our next questioner in queue comes from the line of Josephine Millward with The Benchmark Company..

The Switchblade, do you think we'll see an acceleration on that product soon? I understand the Army has had an outstanding urgent requirement for a while.

And since this is crime-fighting season in Afghanistan, can you talk about -- can you tell us what's been holding this up?.

Well, it -- I did address that issue of expectations on Switchblade in my prepared remarks, Josephine, and to the point that we believe that our customers are coalescing around an adoption of this capability in significant higher levels than they -- than we have seen in the past.

We will be able to know what happens after it happens, and I'll go back to my difficulty in predicting the timing and the rate of adoption of innovative solutions statement.

But we see -- everything we see go -- happening in our ongoing dialogue with our customers supports the fact that this is a compelling new capability that they are likely to proceed with..

That's very helpful.

Can you talk about the DoD's potential Puma upgrade? Do you think this is an AV fiscal year '14 event? And how would it be funded?.

Well, I mentioned a number of new capabilities that we demonstrated with Puma in the prepared remarks. And we have found that all of the customers that have adopted Puma to date have found it to be valuable. I can't think of a customer yet that hasn't increased their usage after their initial experience.

And as we extend the range and add payload capabilities to that platform, it dramatically increases the flexibility and the areas that this can be extended into.

Again, referring back to the comments I made earlier, with the package of capabilities that's now available on the Puma long-endurance variant, we're poking into an area of -- that has previously been available only from much larger Tier 2 systems that tend to be priced at an order of magnitude higher level. So I think that's an ongoing opportunity.

I can't tell you where the -- any specific funding would be coming from in the short term, but I do believe that, that capability is increasingly compelling..

Our next question will come from the line of Howard Rubel with Jefferies..

First, Tim, the 77% number that you talked to, have you back-tested that? And how does that sort of compare with prior points along the way?.

Sure. So last year, at the end of Q1, we had 69%, almost 70% visibility. So the visibility is a little higher this year than last year..

And then just to talk about cash for a moment. Inventories were up. CapEx was up a little bit. Jikun, was there any particular reason for both of those? I mean, in one case, with sort of challenging revenues, one would have thought inventory might have been down and CapEx clearly is a little strong for the first quarter..

Yes. So on the inventory front, if you remember the inventory started building at the end of third quarter. And basically, this is pretty much in preparation for the balance over GFY '12. And so instead of holding it up, we just decided to build it out. So we should be selling that off with this new order coming up here.

On the CapEx front, if you remember last quarter, our CapEx was pretty high also at $4.5 million. So 2 quarters that we have $4.5 million, $4.5 million. The couple -- we do have a couple of products than are transitioning into production, as well as preparing for some of the non-mission services-related services contract that we have..

Our next questioner in queue will come from the line of Michael Ciarmoli with KeyBanc Capital Markets..

It's actually Kevin Ciabattoni on for Mike here. I'm just wondering what you guys have been seeing with your international customers in terms of contracting delays.

Has it been similar to what we've seen domestically? Or it's -- are the orders and contracts flowing any better internationally relative to what we've seen here?.

No, I don't see a lot of difference, Kevin. There may be, and I believe are, different motivations. And circumstances vary from country to country. In some cases, we've seen significant delays that have extended beyond a year in the procurement timing of planned adoptions. But in those cases, there's been no change in the intent, just a pushout.

In other cases, it's more a matter of what we've -- of a pattern that I believe is more typical of such procurements. In that as much as we find our own government procurements to be a little difficult to predict the timing of, I think in the international arena, it's always been a little more difficult than that.

So I -- in balance, I think we see those delays all over the world, different reasons in different places..

Okay, that's helpful.

And then just as a follow-up, can I get some color on what you saw in Q1 in terms of order flow against that $248 million small UAS IDIQ? Just kind of relative to what you saw in fourth quarter, any changes there in terms of the task order flow? And then whether you're kind of still seeing -- I think you mentioned last quarter, you were seeing roughly 90% share against that -- in orders against that contract? Just wondering what you saw in 1Q here..

We're still running very close to that. The IDIQ process, as you said, is a $248 million contract that we received December of last year. To date, I believe, we -- the government has released about $18 million of orders against that and are -- we're running just slightly ahead of 90% in terms of what we've received against that contract..

Our next questioner in queue will come from the line of Patrick McCarthy with FBR..

Maybe a quick follow-up on the CapEx question previously, was any of that CapEx international? Or is it all domestic?.

If you could help me understand that question a little better..

I was just wondering if you're ramping up your facilities internationally.

Or is all of that investment here in the states?.

No, it's mostly domestic at this point in time..

Okay, great. The contract settlement for Global Observer, I'm assuming that drop rate brought rate down to the bottom line.

And could you give us a size of what it was?.

Yes, the -- in general, the contract closeout process entails little to no fees. But it was about half of the delta that we saw for the $3.9 million on the R&D revenue pickup..

Our next question will come from the line of Andrea James with Dougherty & Company..

Is it fair to say the Q1 result does not include any of the Switchblade orders against the Army sole source contract?.

I think that's fair. But I'm hesitating here because if there were any of those revenues, they would not have been significant, I think, is a fair statement..

That's still to -- that's sort of a still-to-come kind of thing?.

That's our expectation..

Okay. And then forgive me if you just -- Jikun, you might have just said this, but I want to make sure. Last quarter, you guys had said that AV was winning 90% of the task orders off the $248 million IDIQ.

Is that still holding steady?.

Yes, it is. There's no significant change since the last time we spoke..

Next questioner in queue is from Howard Rubel with Jefferies..

With the restructuring charges that you took in the quarter, Jikun or Tim, could you give us a general idea now of what you would expect your SG&A to be?.

Yes. So looking at Q1 G&A and -- it's probably an accurate measure of the run rate for the rest of the year..

Our next question comes from Brian Ruttenbur with CRT Capital Group..

Two things. One, you partially addressed the EES revenue growth on the year.

Do you think that it's going to -- there is going to be positive growth on the year? Is that correct, number one?.

That's our current expectation, yes..

Okay.

And then the EPS guidance that you gave of $0.35 to $0.50, that GAAP EPS, which includes the -- your charges in the first quarter, is that correct? Your one-time events in the first quarter?.

Yes. So the $0.35 to $0.50 fully diluted EPS includes those charges. However, it does not include the CybAero notes -- the fair market value fluctuations..

Okay, so it does -- it's not a GAAP number, so there's $3.4 million of charges that aren't included in the $0.35 to $0.50.

Correct?.

Correct..

Okay.

Is there anything else that's going to be backed out of that $0.35 to $0.50 number that you're aware of?.

One more time, please..

I'm sorry, is there anything else to back out of that $0.35 to $0.50 number besides the CybAero notes, the $3.4 million?.

No. However, that -- those -- we will be making an adjustment on a quarterly basis as the CybAero stock fluctuates. So there's another 3 opportunities for that to move up or down as a function of that stock price..

Okay, and then just one other question.

On the gross margin on the year, do you anticipate to be similar to last fiscal year's overall or weaker because of the quarter, this first quarter start?.

Yes. So -- yes, we don't explicitly guide on gross margins. But you can see that our SG&A and R&D run rate is a little lower this year relative to last year. So -- and again, I think we've got it on the share count EPS and the tax rates, so you should be able to get to an off-margin [ph] And then back up from there..

And that does conclude our time for questions. I'd like to turn the program back over to Mr. Gitlin for any additional or closing remarks..

Thanks, Huey, and thank you all for your attention and your interest in AeroVironment. An archived version of this call, all SEC filings and relevant company and industry news can be found on our website, www.avinc.com. We look forward to speaking with you again following next quarter's results. Have a good day..

Thank you, presenters. And thank you, ladies and gentlemen. Again, this does conclude today's call. Thank you for your participation and have a wonderful day. Attendees, you may now disconnect..