ZETA - NYSE

Greetings, and welcome to the

Thank you, operator. Hello, everyone, and thank you for joining us for

Thank you, Matt. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us today. For the 17th quarter in a row, we once again delivered a beat and raise quarter, driven by our leadership in AI-powered marketing. In Q3, revenue was $337 million, up 28% year-over-year ex political and LiveIntent. This is an acceleration in growth from Q2. Adjusted EBITDA was $78 million, up 46% year-over-year. And free cash flow was $47 million, up 83% year-over-year, representing a margin of 14%. This is the highest free cash flow margin we have ever achieved, and we did it while accelerating our revenue growth ex political and LiveIntent. This demonstrates our focus on driving growth and improved profitability while investing to extend our AI leadership. Based on our year-to-date momentum and our record pipeline exiting

Thank you, David, and good afternoon, everyone. The theme of our Investor Day in October was durable, predictable and profitable growth, and our third quarter results are a perfect illustration of this. Our revenue growth, excluding political and LiveIntent, accelerated to 28% in Q3 from 27% in Q2 and 26% in Q1, showing the durability of our growth. Our third quarter results once again exceeded our guidance for both revenue and adjusted EBITDA, highlighting the predictability of our growth. And we achieved the highest free cash flow margin in our history, achieving the Rule of 40 on a free cash flow margin basis, demonstrating the profitability of our growth. With that, let's dive into the details of the quarter. In Q3, we delivered revenue of $337 million, up 26% year-over-year or 28% when excluding the contribution from LiveIntent and political candidate revenue in the year ago period. We exceeded the midpoint of our guidance by $9 million or 3 percentage points higher than our forecast, solidly within the 2 to 5 points of cushion we typically leave ourselves. Total scaled customer count grew to 572, up 20% year-over-year and an addition of 5 customers sequentially. We ended the quarter with 180 super-scaled customers, up 25% year-over-year and an addition of 12 customers sequentially. The strong super-scaled customer additions were broad-based across industry verticals and driven by cross-sell of LiveIntent customers and our One

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Arjun Bhatia with William Blair & Company.

Perfect. Congrats on another great quarter, guys, very nicely done. One question for you, David. Just at a high level, I'm curious like as you look at the next kind of pocket of spend that's out there, I imagine a lot of it is going to come from media budgets. How do you think kind of

Thank you, Arjun. I'm obviously very proud of the team for the quarter. Let me start by saying that if you look at our collective clients, you've got 572 clients that spend over $100 billion a year in marketing today. If you look at the global marketing spend, it's about 75% media and about 25% CRMS revenues. When we look at the breakdown of those 2, we continue to be substantially more profitable than anybody else in the media space. In fact, a number of our clients use our platform, which allows our data to inform the way they market into the walled gardens today, and we already partner with most all of the walled gardens. So when you think about it, every dollar that is spent through the

All right. Perfect. Very helpful. And then maybe one just on customer count and me nitpicking a little bit here, but it seems like in Q3, I think you added 5 scaled customers. And if I look at just the last 2 quarters, it's been hovering around 20. Is there anything sort of one-off that we need to consider there, just maybe agencies and us not having brand count visibility? And just how should we think about that metric sort of evolving over the next couple of quarters?

Yes, I'm glad you asked, Arjun. Three data points for you. First, on a year-over-year basis, that 20% growth in total scaled customer count is, a, consistent with where we've been this year and obviously north of our model of 4% to 5%. But to your point around sequentially, we had a really strong progression from scaled to super-scaled customers. We increased by 12% sequentially, which is, if you look back at our history, certainly at the higher end. And then to your point around agencies, what's also being masked in the total-scaled customer count is we were up 23 brands quarter-to-quarter. So as we continue to have success scaling within and adding new agencies, that doesn't necessarily add to scaled customer count. But in this case, it certainly translates to higher brand expansion. So we're really happy with the scaled customer count expansion this quarter.

Our next question comes from the line of Elizabeth Porter with Morgan Stanley.

I wanted to follow up, David, on your target for the $100 million incremental business after

Thank you, Elizabeth. So first of all, last year, we closed about $57 million in business coming out of

Great. And then just as a quick follow-up. On the LiveIntent piece, understanding it's a smaller portion of the business, but it looks like it was a little bit weaker in Q3 and in Q4 guidance. So wondering if there's any trends to kind of call out there on how that integration is going?

Yes. Thanks, Elizabeth. I'll take that. Look, in short, we're really happy with how LiveIntent is performing. We are accruing at 100% of their earn-out. I think if we were to do things over again, remember, we set that initial guidance skew for every quarter of 2025, about a month after we owned the asset. We've learned a lot since. I think we're also realizing a substantial amount of new product synergies that is flowing organically to the business. But overall, I couldn't be happier with how the integration has gone and the execution of the team.

And what you're not seeing in the numbers is all of the cross-sales from

Our next question comes from the line of Matt Swanson with RBC.

David, we've seen the compounding value from an ARPU perspective when customers take multiple products. You talked about Athena and AI being the new UI. Can you just talk a little bit about how maybe that will help with the cross-sell and for people to see the full value of your platform?

Thank you, Matt. I would tell you that I think Athena will be amongst the single biggest drivers to the One

One point where that Matt shows up also in the metrics is one of the areas that as we were preparing post close that stood out to me is not only did each of our use cases grow double digits year-over-year, which has been consistent, but our 2 or more use case count grew over 100% year-over-year. So we're going into capabilities like Athena with really interesting go-to-market momentum.

Yes. And once again, with 100 global enterprises in Marigold that are all on one use case, we see that as a very unique opportunity for the specialty team we've set up under Ed See to get in there and focus on it. But I think that the integration and production capabilities of Athena are going to be really an accelerant to platform utilization.

That's really helpful. And then I'm sure the pipeline has a big -- a lot to do with this. But David, you mentioned that the '26 guide was a quarter early. So Chris, could you just kind of talk us through being one of the first people to give us an outlook into 2026? Just what's kind of building all the confidence and the visibility that you have?

Yes. We talked about at Investor Day, Matt, you'll recall that so much of our installed base not only has been with us 3-plus years, almost 60%, 5 or more years, but there's now a demonstrated history of there, on average, expanding their spend with us 15 points a year. So by starting our guide at 21% year-over-year, which, by the way, is consistent with really the last 2 years of where we started our guidance, we feel like we've left even some conservatism there. The pipeline says a lot. And then with more and more of our revenue under the curve from really strong signings throughout the year, it just -- it felt like today was the right time. Again, wanted to be clean with our organic baseline before we added Marigold. And I wouldn't want to overlook the really strong addition, not just to revenue, but how much of that revenue for 2026 out of the gate is flowing towards increasing adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow. In fact, this year, from our initial guide of revenue, which was around 21%, so we've obviously added to that since, but that translates to $35 million of revenue and $28 million of free cash flow that's been added to the guide since the beginning of the year as well.

Our next question comes from the line of DJ Hynes with Canaccord Genuity.

Congrats on a really nice quarter here. David, Chris, I want to ask how you're thinking about sales and marketing investment and capacity build-out there. I mean, obviously, the operating leverage is great to see, but sales and marketing actually went down sequentially. And you shared some really powerful pipeline statistics around the growth there and the strength coming out of

Yes. I mean it went down a little bit by accident. We didn't mean it to. Quite frankly, we're trying to hire every great salesperson we can possibly get, DJ. The challenge is that our existing sales reps have been so incredibly productive that we've been able to continue to grow at a much faster pace than we expected to while simultaneously trying to find more salespeople. We will pick up an incredible sales team with Marigold, both in the United States and Europe and EMEA. So it feels like we're sort of very well positioned for where we want to go, although -- once again, we did grow 28% top line, 43% EBITDA line -- I'm sorry, 46% don't want to screw us out of that last 3%, but 46% growth on EBITDA and 83% free cash flow growth, while simultaneously, DJ, making some of the largest investments we have ever made into our artificial intelligence and innovation. So feeling very good about where we are organizationally.

You'll see a pretty material tick up 3Q to 4Q with

Yes. Yes. Okay. Makes sense. And then, Chris, while I have you, maybe can you talk about gross margins in the quarter? I mean, direct revenue mix held pretty stable at that 75%. We saw a little bit of degradation in gross margin. Just anything we should be thinking about there as we model the numbers going forward?

Yes, mix was up nicely year-over-year. But to your point, it was -- stayed at that higher end of our range, 75% quarter-to-quarter. What we wrestle with on occasion is mix within the mix. And frankly, this quarter, we had really strong display video channel usage. That display video channel usage is lower than what we average on our total direct revenue mix profile. But to give you a sense of just how much channel usage we're seeing, our greater than 4 cohorts, so those scaled customers using 4 or more channels was up 44% year-over-year and our greater than 5 or more channels is up over 60% year-to-year. So mix within the mix, but consistent with our model, our long-term model that each year, we want to get between 100 basis points and 300 basis points of efficiency on the cost of revenue line.

Our next question comes from the line of Clark Wright with...

Awesome. It was great to see a strong quarter of organic growth. I was wondering if you could talk a little bit more about the contributions from the agency. You talked about 23 brands being added. How should we think about the growth of the agency business and independent agencies relative to the direct enterprise relationships as we head into 2026?

Yes. We break out our business in a lot of different ways and give you a lot of metrics. One of them we're going to keep to is, keep the disaggregation of revenue down to direct and integrated. But what I will point to is as a proxy for how healthy our agencies are growing. You would see the direct mix was up over 30% on a year-over-year revenue growth basis. And then mix within the agencies, let me just look at my notes here, was up pretty substantially as well from a direct perspective. Let me just get the exact data point here for you. Matt, if you have it. let's say, direct -- agency direct mix was up from 52% direct to almost 60% this quarter.

I mean direct to enterprise -- yes, I'm sorry, Clark, I was just going to say direct to enterprise continues to be the vast majority of our business, and I think will be for many years to come. But we love our agency clients, and we continue to expand with them very nicely. So it's been a really good blend to have both.

Our next question comes from the line of Jason Kreyer.

All right. Great. So first on Athena. When you think about your 572 scale customers, are there specific groups or segments of that where you think Athena resonates better than others?

So Jason, I would start by saying I think our direct enterprise clients will probably adopt it in a more meaningful way first, which is not to say we don't think it really plays very well with the agency clients. From a vertical perspective, I don't really think it's going to be that differentiated. I think if you have not seen the demo yet, which was standing-room only, I say standing-room only, there were people sitting on the floor who physically asked me to move so they could see the demo. We have a recording of it on our Investor Relations site. But I would tell you that when you put that type of power in the hands of a client, they're going to really adopt it very, very quickly. And we're excited about that.

And just going back to the momentum topic. At the Investor Day, you had talked about 80% faster onboarding. There's some operational streamlining you've been doing. So you just hosted

Let me start by saying our goal is to close $100 million in business, not just get the pipeline to $100 million, Jason. So we're on the same page. When you look at the fact that we've given guidance early to next year, we've now raised the fourth quarter this year, it's our 17th quarter of raising in a row. We feel like we've got the wind at our back or we wouldn't be in a position to do both of those things. So I think that our confidence level is very, very high based on where the record pipeline is, what's coming out of

Our next question comes from the line of Terry Tillman with Truist...

The first question is, I was just hoping to double-click on the replacement cycle opportunity. I think there was a stat that was provided at the Analyst Day about the last couple of quarters, the RFP activity had been up quite a bit. And I don't know if that's independent of the

Yes. So let me start by saying that the replacement cycle continues to be at full scale. And we are not just seeing more RFPs in our company's history. We are seeing the largest RFPs we have ever seen. And if you look at the legacy marketing clouds, the guys like Salesforce, Oracle, Adobe, one of them is leading the industry. The other 2 are legacy. They're great companies with legacy technology. We are the next generation of Marketing Cloud. And we're really focused on how do we continue to win in what is an even faster accelerating replacement cycle. As it relates to

That's great to hear. And I guess I won't ask for more cylinders past 12. Maybe that's for another conversation. But in terms of the independents, I think you added 3 last quarter. I was impressed at the Analyst Day, one of the -- your folks that was on stage was an independent, and it was pretty impressive their kind of passion for the platform. Maybe you could just give us an update on the independent side in terms of agencies.

Yes. So there -- it's growing very rapidly. And when you look at the different agencies that we're now platforming, even though we call them independent agencies, each one of them is representing between $1 billion and $2-plus billion a year in marketing revenue. So very excited about what's happening there, Terry. We've built out a sales force that's now solely focusing on independent agencies, and they are really, really rocking. I would tell you, we had -- I can't give you the count, but so many independent agencies attended

Our next question comes from the line of Gabriela Borges with Goldman Sachs.

David, my question is on Athena and more specifically on the process for implementation and deployment within customer environments.

Yes. So Gabriela, I don't know if I lost you -- I'm sorry, I lost you for a second there. I heard the Athena and then you got into deployment?

Yes, the process of deployment and the learning curve on deterministic versus nondeterministic outcomes when you work with customers to deploy Athena.

So first of all, great question as usual. All of our deterministic -- all of our actions at

Our next question comes from the line of Richard Baldry with ROTH Capital.

Can you talk about sort of the architecture around Athena? And another thing about is, how easy or challenging would it be to extend that to cover new platforms? Obviously, something like Marigold would be a place to look at.

Yes. So I mean, Athena's architecture is fully internally built. We are partnering with OpenAI as it relates to the voice interface, and we're excited about that. As it relates to what we can layer it on top of, we can easily layer it on top of any platform that has an open API. And when you think about where we're trying to go long term, yes, Athena is native to the application layer at the

So last 2 for me. Does having Athena make you likely to be more acquisitive maybe as tuck-ins because you can bring it under that umbrella kind of easier? And then maybe for Chris, do you think long term or even short term about the buybacks as a percent of free cash flow? Where is your thinking lately on that?

So as it relates to being acquisitive, as you've heard me joke, Rich, we've been in business now for 17 years. We've bought 17 companies. It's highly probable that there'll be an 18th at some point. I don't know if Athena makes us more acquisitive, but it certainly becomes a bridge into anything we do going forward. And as we think about today, being the #1 marketing cloud using artificial intelligence and data native to the application layer, Athena gives us the opportunity to expand and increase our TAM and our addressable market by moving into other business intelligence and other opportunities. Chris -- As it relates to the buyback, Chris was sort of jumping on something for the second. We continue to focus on using greater than half of our free cash flow for retiring shares and repurchasing shares. Quite frankly, the only reason we didn't buy more over the last quarter was because once we signed the agreement to do Marigold before we announced it, we were an internal quiet period. We weren't able to buy stock back. So I believe we were in the mid-70s as a percentage of free cash flow for share repurchasing year-to-date. I could see us continuing at those.

We've done about 85% year-to-date. We have a lot of dry powder in the next 200 program.

Sounds good. Congrats on a great quarter.

Our next question comes from the line of

And congrats on a strong quarter. David, I thought it was notable to call out that you've seen some strong momentum in the telecom vertical. So just curious, what's going so well on that front in terms of building that momentum with telecom customers? And is a lot of that success really coming as a displacement for other solutions with these major customers?

Yes. I mean you've got a lot of different telecom players out there really, really struggling for growth. And our platform allows them to grow at an accelerated pace at a lower cost than our competitors' platform. So what I would tell you in almost all cases, we're displacing one of the major marketing clouds at this point. There's very few companies that are sort of doing this stuff internally. So we're very excited about telecom. It's growing at an accelerated pace, and it's something we think will continue. Chris?

Yes. A couple of other points, I think,

Understood. And a follow-up for Chris, just around the free cash flow conversion. It's nice to see the strong execution here in Q3 even despite the working capital headwinds. As we think about modeling out into future years, do you assume those working capital headwinds regarding collections with agencies will start to ease? Or how are you thinking about that as we move forward from here?

If you adjust,

Our next question comes from the line of Jackson Ader with KeyBanc...

First one is on the, I guess, visibility into 2026. David, you mentioned, normally, we don't get this kind of forward guidance a quarter early. But I'm curious like is it more than just the pipeline? Do the large customers you're doing business with actually -- do they have commitments that give you more confidence or that the spend level is going to go up in the future that might not have existed in years passed?

Yes. Yes. We're seeing much larger contracts from our larger clients, and it's giving us far more visibility and comfort in the numbers.

Right. So it's -- okay, pipeline bigger, but also visibility also bigger?

Yes, Jackson, to be specific, large clients are giving us larger contracts than we've ever had before and far more visibility into our forward numbers than we've had in the past.

And tactically, Jackson, this time of year, frankly, August, September, we're in our kind of next year planning process anyway, not just internally, but with our customers. So even though historically and what we would normally expect under absent a Marigold-type transaction giving guidance in February, a lot of that work is effectively already done.

Got it. Okay. Okay. And then a quick follow-up. You mentioned the political candidate revenue expectations for last year. But curious whether you have any initial expectations for advocacy and how that works in that in the, call it, like the off-cycle election years?

It's followed, Jackson, a similar pattern as candidate spend, meaning if you go back to the midterms in 2022, where we had political candidate revenue of around $7.5 million. This year, we're planning for effectively double that. I would think along similar lines for advocacy from kind of midterm to midterm. The tricky part for that for us and why I specifically said in the prepared remarks, I think this number will evolve is those deals can come into the pipeline very rapidly, much faster or I should say, later in the process than what a typical enterprise or an agency deal would come in. So it tends to be something that happens on a quicker time line for us. So hence, why I think that number is going to continue to evolve.

Our last question comes from the line of Koji Ikeda with Bank of America.

I wanted to ask a question on Marigold for 2026. And I know it hasn't closed yet, but really wanted to ask around -- because you've had such success in the past with acquisitions, I think about acquisitions where you guys -- for you guys with like more around 1 plus 1 equals more than 2. And so with your guys giving out a '26 guide out there, thank you very much for that. And previously, you've kind of given a guide for, I think, $190 million for Marigold for 2026. I mean, I guess where I'm going with this is that -- it sounds like just stacking $190 million on the $1.54 billion guide for 2026 could be understating the opportunity with Marigold. Of course, I don't want to get over my skis here, but just given your track record with acquisitions, it doesn't seem like that's out of the realm.

Yes. So let me start by saying we do not want to have the guidance combined for the two yet. The reason we put the organic guidance out was because the last time we did this with LiveIntent, half of the analysts added it, half did not, and it created a tremendous amount of confusion. So when we do close that deal, Koji, which we expect to do this year, we will 100% update what we believe it will do on top of the $1.54 billion. And I just wanted to get that out there. Second, we started this year at a 21% guide, and we're going to -- we're already at 26%. So we've added 500 basis points from where we expected to be at the beginning of the year. As you know, we've known you now for a very long time. For 17 quarters in a row, we've beaten our guidance and raised our guidance. Our goal is to be sitting here at the end of next year and saying we've done that 22x, right? So we are very good at M&A. We have our pillars. We believe that Marigold fits every one of our pillars, and we believe that it's going to create a really nice tailwind to the growth of the combined company, specifically around taking their 100 global enterprise clients and making them from one use case to multiple use cases. As you point out, we always want 1 plus 1 to equal 4. When you look at moving from a single use case to multiple use cases around the

Yes, totally does. And looking forward to that press release on the closing of Marigold, absolutely. And maybe just a follow-up for you, David. I did want to -- now that on the back of

Well, I'm not even sure you could put the way they looked at us 3 years ago to the day in the same conversation. It is so advanced, Koji. What I would tell you is we started this journey and 3 years ago, we were at