IONQ - NYSE

Good day, and welcome to the IonQ Second Quarter 2025 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note this event is being recorded. I would like to turn the conference over to [ Hanley Donofrio ], Investor Relations Director. Please go ahead.

Good afternoon, everyone, and welcome to IonQ's Second Quarter 2025 Earnings Call. My name is [ Hanley Donofrio ], and I am the Investor Relations Director here at IonQ. I'm pleased to be joined on today's call by Niccolo de Masi, IonQ's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; Thomas Kramer, our Chief Financial Officer; Jordan Shapiro, our President and General Manager of Quantum Networking; Frank Backes, President of Capella; and Dean Kassmann, our Senior Vice President of Engineering and Technology. By now, everyone should have access to the company's second quarter 2025 earnings press release issued this afternoon, which is available on the Investor Relations section of our website at investors.ionq.com. Please note that on today's call, management will refer to adjusted EBITDA, which is a non-GAAP financial measure. While the company believes this non-GAAP financial measure provides useful information for investors, the presentation of this information is not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the financial information presented in accordance with GAAP. You are directed to our press release for a reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA to its closest comparable GAAP measure. During the call, we will discuss our business outlook and make forward-looking statements. These comments are based on our predictions and expectations as of today. Actual events or results could differ materially due to a number of risks and uncertainties, including those mentioned in our 10-Q that we have filed with the SEC today. We undertake no obligation to revise any statements to reflect changes that occur after this call, except as required by law. Now I'll turn it over to Niccolo de Masi, Chairman and CEO of IonQ.

Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us. I would like to begin today's call with an update from our Board, which earlier today announced my appointment as Chairman. Peter Chapman, our previous Chairman, has now stepped down from his position at IonQ. I want to thank Peter for his long-time service to IonQ over the last 6 years and wish him the very best in his retirement from IonQ. I'm honored to receive this further vote of confidence in me by the Board as IonQ continues to extend its leadership in Quantum Computing and Quantum Networking. As I take on these additional responsibilities, I'm excited to continue executing on our strategic priorities and extending IonQ's leadership position in the quantum era. IonQ is experiencing incredible momentum, and I've never been more confident in our potential as we have look ahead. With that, let's get into our latest results. We had an exciting quarter at IonQ. Revenue beat the top end of guidance by 15%, and we completed the largest capital raise from a single institution in the quantum industry, growing our net cash position by $1 billion. While our CFO will detail last month's investment from an affiliate of Susquehanna in greater detail, the $1 billion investment was closed at a premium to the prior market close. It is an endorsement of all we have achieved thus far and are poised to deliver in the coming quarters and years. This quarter, we significantly expanded our global footprint, solidifying our role as the partner of choice by countries building their quantum economies. We signed an MOU designed to advance quantum computing in Japan with AIST's G-QuAT, the country's premier R&D center for quantum and AI. We were also recently named the primary quantum partner by South Korea's KISTI Institute to build their National Quantum Center of Excellence. In the U.S., we announced a $22 million deal to build the first commercial quantum computing and networking hub in America with EPB, a pioneering power and telecommunications company. Additionally, our partnership with the U.S. government continues with our selection by DARPA to help inform quantum industry standards. Beyond building these ecosystem partnerships, we are proving our value on critical commercial applications. For example, we launched a world-first collaboration with Astra

Thank you, Niccolo. I'm excited to share that after announcing the formation of our Quantum Networking division last quarter, we are already making significant progress in positioning IonQ as the leading provider of the quantum Internet. The takeaways for today are as follows: one, Quantum Networking provides the ultimate in cybersecurity today for customers' intent on long-term security for data transmission, protecting against sophisticated classical threats from bad actors worldwide. Quantum Key Distribution or QKD, is the only provably secure protection against potential future hacking attempts made by quantum computers. Two, IonQ's QKD products are the only ones in the world to have any form of formal security certification. Three, IonQ is the only company offering commercial quantum networks at scale today that leverage quantum entanglement, meaning they can be used to connect quantum computers and other quantum devices. Four, IonQ's quantum computers are the only systems that are being developed with quantum networking built in. As Niccolo mentioned, our QKD products are already being used in production by leading governments, financial institutions, telecom providers, energy companies and enterprises. Customers buy QKD because it is the only technology that uses the principles of quantum physics to ensure that no one can steal their data. Software techniques like post-quantum cryptography algorithms, while offering some protection are not provably secure. Over time, their security is decreasing and vulnerabilities are rising. Our customers trust IonQ because our QKD products are already manufactured at scale, fit into a 1-unit high rack mountable server and are used every day to protect information across the globe. Moreover, our cutting-edge Clavis devices produced by ID Quantique received the world's first-ever security certification for QKD earlier this year via South Korea's National Intelligence Service. Meanwhile, IonQ is the only company building the quantum Internet at commercial scale. We are working with customers to bring all forms of quantum edge devices onto our quantum networks from security endpoints to quantum computers. IonQ customers will soon be able to cluster quantum computers for extremely powerful processing, send ultra secure data from one quantum computer to another and seamlessly transmit data from quantum sensors to quantum computers. A key milestone in this road map is our ability to build quantum networks over standard telecom fiber, which requires technology to convert wavelengths from these quantum devices to wavelengths compatible with classical networks. We are working on that technology with customers today and expect to be the first company in the world to achieve it. Across all dimensions, the infrastructure for the quantum Internet is being built here at IonQ. Now I'd like to hand the call over to Frank Backes, CEO of Capella.

Thank you, Jordan. As both Jordan and Niccolo have highlighted, we are witnessing a revolution in the global computing and networking landscape driven by the maturation and deployment of quantum technologies. Today, I'd like to offer the perspective of the space sector on how quantum-enhanced space systems and sensors are poised to transform the future of computing and networking infrastructure, integrating advanced capabilities into everyday applications. Newly a part of IonQ, Capella is focused on taking quantum technologies into orbit. We design, manufacture, own and operate a proliferated constellation of low earth orbit satellites that we plan to outfit with quantum communication devices, quantum sensors and one day quantum computers. We believe that our quantum-enabled satellites will be highly differentiated in the market, paving the way for a new generation of ultra secure, extremely powerful computing and networking infrastructure with a global footprint. Capella has already proven we can put production-grade satellites into orbit. Today, we are producing streams of earth observation data with a constellation of satellites that operate day or night through clouds and in other challenging conditions, bringing critical information to leading defense, government and enterprise customers. IonQ will be expanding Capella's proliferated low earth orbit constellation to meet global demand. The integration of IonQ Technologies means we will be able to collect and process data in never before seen ways and transmit that data in a way that is probably secure even from the threat of quantum computers. We are committed to pioneering the new frontier of quantum technologies in space, providing our customers with an accelerated path to secure, high-performance and resilient solutions for the future. Now I'd like to hand the call over to Thomas Kramer, IonQ's CFO.

Thank you, Niccolo, Jordan and Frank. It has been truly an exciting quarter on the commercial front, and our financials are no exception. Let's walk through this quarter's financial results in more detail. As Niccolo mentioned, we had a fantastic quarter, recognizing revenue of $20.7 million, beating the high end of our guidance by 15%. In addition, we are making new investments to accelerate our road map as well as entering new segments of the market, and we expect to continue to invest in the ecosystems that support our customers. Accordingly, we saw an adjusted EBITDA loss for the second quarter of $36.5 million compared to a $23.7 million loss in the prior-year period. To understand the key drivers behind that number, let's turn to our expenses. Total operating costs for the second quarter were $181.3 million, up 201% from $60.3 million in the prior-year period, but within our plan for the year. To break this down further, our research and development costs for the second quarter were $103.4 million, up 231% from $31.2 million in the prior-year period. Recall that we are investing heavily in R&D and growing our R&D headcount to support our road map and customer commitments. Our sales and marketing costs in the second quarter were $10.9 million, up 77% from $6.1 million in the prior-year period. This increase was due to us growing both our marketing and sales teams as we continue investing in our commercial efforts. Our general and administrative costs in the second quarter were $48.1 million, up 269% from $13.1 million in the prior-year period. These increases were primarily driven by an increase in professional services and payroll-related expenses. All of this resulted in a net loss of $177.5 million in the second quarter compared to a $37.6 million net loss in the prior-year period. Accounting for warrants can be confusing, so we have always pointed out the impact they have on our results. This Q2 loss includes a noncash loss of $39.6 million for the second quarter related to the fair value of our warrant liabilities. This is a pure accounting artifact that is not representative of the operating performance of our business. These results also include growth in stock-based compensation expense related to our headcount growth, which was $99.2 million for the second quarter compared to $21 million in the prior-year period. This elevated stock-based compensation expense was due primarily to incentives issued to newly acquired and hired employees. Turning now to our balance sheet. Cash, cash equivalents and investments as of June 30, 2025, were $656.8 million. As we announced previously, in July, we raised $1 billion in an equity offering priced at a 25% premium above our closing price for the prior trading session. This investment, to our knowledge, is the largest investment by a single investor into quantum computing and networking, and we are honored to be the recipient. The equity offering also included 7-year warrants at $99.88 per share, a strong indication of confidence in IonQ's longer-term prospects. Our pro forma cash balance as of July 9, 2025, was $1.6 billion, making IonQ the most well-capitalized pure-play quantum provider in the market today. Continuing now to our financial outlook. We are increasing our revenue guidance for the full year 2025 to be between $82 million and $100 million and expect revenue for the third quarter to be between $25 million and $29 million. Last quarter, we projected an adjusted EBITDA loss of $162 million for the full year 2025. Pending the close of the Oxford Ionics acquisition, we anticipate that integration and our continued investments into to accelerate our road map will result in an increase to our cost base for the year. We envision this will widen our adjusted EBITDA loss up to 30% or a total of $211 million. Now back to you, Niccolo.

Our customer ecosystem now includes not only the winning quantum computing road map, but also the clear global leader in quantum networking. We, in fact, expect our unit economics advantage in the fully fault tolerant era to be 1 to 2 orders of magnitude lower than competitor efforts. IonQ has commercialized considerably faster than start-ups who do not have our 30-year heritage. We were first to operate on all 3 of the Google, Amazon and Microsoft public clouds 5 years ago. Looking forward, we believe our unit economic advantages will underpin IonQ's long-term market share leadership. IonQ also intends to accelerate its investment in our application road map, which we outlined in our June 9 webinar. Given our unparalleled unit economics at scale, we have a clear opportunity in the coming years to profitably address long hypothesized quantum classics such as the traveling salesperson problem as well as Shor's algorithm. I'll now turn this over to the operator for Q&A.

[Operator Instructions] First question comes from Quinn Bolton with Needham & Co.

Congratulations on all the progress again this quarter. I guess I wanted to start with the revenue that came in better than expected. That's great to see. You guys are diversifying the revenue stream now with the Quantum Key Distribution, quantum networking efforts. And I was wondering if you could give us some sense how much revenue are you starting to generate from the non-quantum computing efforts in the business? And then I've got a follow-up.

So thank you for those words and a great question. We are continuing to deliver on our plans for the year, and the beat on this quarter was primarily due to 2 projects for existing customers where we've been able to accelerate the pace of implementation.

And were those mostly on the quantum computing side? Or could that include like the Air Force Research Lab on quantum networking? Just some sense on the mix. Is it still predominantly quantum computing?

It's an excellent question. But as we've said in previous quarters, many of these projects, in particular, the AFRL one contains both sides of the coin. It's quantum computing and networking.

Got it. Second question is you guys on the -- I guess, in June, you announced the acquisition of Oxford Ionics, you were selected for the DARP quantum benchmarking program back in early April. And I guess, as you guys have pivoted the road map now or accelerated the road map with Oxford Ionics, can you just sort of address how are you feeling about progressing from Stage A to Stage B in QBI?

Yes. No, I'm happy to take this. It's Niccolo. Well, look, the fantastic thing about the talent density and the technology that we've assembled at IonQ is that Oxford Ionics itself was also put into the DARPA/QBI initiative earlier this year. So IonQ is in a fantastic position overall. Both ourselves and our announced acquisition, obviously, are considered fantastic businesses in their own right. On a combined basis, we think it's, of course, an even stronger offering. So I think it's safe to say that we continue to progress as 2 shots on goal, if you will, until the acquisition closes. But once it closes, we'll be progressing as a single unified road map that we think is extremely powerful when you think about not just how many logical qubits we're going to have pretty soon, but also the unit economics involved, we feel very good about our prospects, both in Phase B and ultimately in Phase C.

Excellent. And maybe last, Niccolo, just any update on the timing of the close on Oxford Ionics. Could you just give us an update where you are on any regulatory approvals that you need? Do you still expect to close that transaction later in calendar '25?

Yes, we absolutely do still expect it to close later. This is, of course, subject to regulatory approval in the U.K. And that is proceeding constructively, but we are not able to give a precise date on this call, although I think it's safe to say that both Oxford and IonQ, of course, look forward to a closing as soon as possible.

The next question comes from Troy Jensen from Cantor Fitzgerald.

Gentlemen, congrats on all the progress and milestones here.

Thank you.

So Niccolo, maybe for you, first of all, 80,000 logical qubits by 2030. At that level, can you just talk about what type of encryption are you guys crashing? Or how advanced is the quantum computer at that point?

Yes. I mean, Troy, I think we have the leading logical qubit road map bar none on a global basis. And I say that not only because of the sheer number of logical qubits, but also the cost of a machine of that size, which is very low compared to competitors you might run into, Troy, that probably will have machines that will cost 10 or 100x more for a similar number of logical qubits. We published an application road map on June 9 at our webinar, and we showed you every year on our road map, what we can do from an applications perspective. So we're showing you what we can do even at 1,500 logical qubits. We're showing we can do at 10,000 logical qubits, and we're showing you can do, of course, at 8,000. What I think I would highlight is these are just the known application areas that we've identified that we already are working on. As you've seen throughout the compute space, Troy, from CPUs to GPUs to now our QPUs, much of the upside and value comes from problems that you haven't thought of addressing yet. And it comes -- it kind of emerges, if you will, as an emerging phenomenon as you start solving problems with ever more doubly exponentially powerful machines as IonQ has. So I think there's tremendous upside in the app road map from quantum AI and quantum machine learning in particular. We've already made some industrial AI applications as far back as World Quantum Day on April 13, 14 earlier this year. We're continuing to make progress with a number of partners, not just in the AI space, but of course, in the drug discovery space. You saw announcements from us on protein folding as well as, of course, with Astra

Great answers. Just like a follow-up and kind of a couple of things together here. Just can you talk about just the acquisitions you've done? I think it's like 6 now, integrating all these businesses. I've seen companies struggle doing 1 or 2 acquisitions, you guys doing a lot at the same time here. You got a lot of money on your balance sheet. Thoughts on kind of more consolidation? Or if you could just address that topic, that would be great.

Yes. I mean, look, we have a couple of things. So I've made more than 50 acquisitions in my career as a public company leader across over a dozen public companies. And so I'd like to think we get better at these things over time. You heard from Frank Backes, who is actually on this call. Frank and I were very focused on cultural fit early on. We're all professional managers of our firm. We both want to make the industrial logic work. It's the same with Oxford Ionics and Lightsynq and our friends at Qubitech and Entangled Networks from earlier this year and last year. And what we're finding actually is 1 plus 1 doesn't just equal 3, it equals 13 or 30. And there is mutual curiosity when we merge with new entities. Everyone is aligned and, of course, taking stock in an enlarged IonQ. And so everyone is able to both work together to rally on our biggest revenue opportunities, but also to continue growing their business in its own right. So we're investing in the infrastructure we need to make sure integrations go well. We've got experience on it, whether it's IT through to the actual technical road maps and of course, the soft side, if you will, of making sure that people have similar cultural definitions and understandings of success. But honestly, we don't lose any sleep about this because there is so much to gain together. The teams are proactively excited and reaching out to one another and doing the integration, honestly, on their own in a lot of ways. So yes, I mean, look, we will continue to monitor the landscape. We now have 2 big growth vectors for our business, right, computing and networking. Networking, we're doing both on the ground, but also ground to space, space to space and space to ground, the most vulnerable pieces of our communications infrastructure. And I think we're finding that new opportunities are unlocking themselves, frankly, every week. We have put together a unique asset and business here, right? No one else in the world can do networking on the ground, in space and computing. And right now, sovereign nations in the friendly world want more of everything that IonQ has to offer. And so we're supply limited, not demand limited, if that makes sense.

The next question comes from Joe Moore with Morgan Stanley.

I wanted to ask about Chris Monroe coming back. I am getting kind of questions about it. It seems like it's great news. He's obviously -- you characterized his capabilities, but it caused some consternation when he left. And just maybe if you could address, is there anything to sort of read into the fact that he left and then came back now?

Well, I like -- look, it's Niccolo. I'd like to say that there's something to be read into all of the tremendous talent that's joined IonQ in the past quarter. So whether it's Rick Muller or Marco Pistoia, Chris Monroe, Paul Dacier, we've also added a long list actually of VPs to the business in the last quarter in areas from business development through to actually acquisition integrations. And so I think everyone is recognizing that -- As want to work with As and talent success helps attract yet more of it. I think, Chris, spending more time with us is a tremendous vote of confidence, not just in our computing road map, but also our networking road map. I think it speaks very highly of what he thinks about Chris Ballance and Mihir Bhaskar as well. And I think you're seeing that you've got 4 world records, if you will, held by individuals who are all at IonQ, both on the fidelity side as well as the networking side. And they want to continue pioneering the future together right here at IonQ, right? So we're excited to have everyone. We welcome ever more world-class talent. I think we've attracted some in the organization that haven't been announced today, but continue to join us from nation's finest laboratories. And on a global basis, we're always on the lookout for the very best, most experienced everywhere from networking to computing to applications. So I'd say, look, in summary, it is, I think, a vindication of our strategy. We're excited to have Chris here, and we're excited to have everyone else that we've announced today all working together because we recognize that we're at the intersection of pioneering technology that has never done what we've done in the last decade or 2. And the next 5 years, 10 years has even more to be built together.

The next question comes from Richard Shannon with Craig-Hallum.

This is Tyler on for Richard Shannon. I was wondering, can Lightsynq be ran at room temperature for compute or sensing purposes? And if so, what is the plan for those? And I'll let you go from there. I have a follow-up.

This is Dean. So the overall technology that Lightsynq has in their quantum memories does require cryogenic kind of mild cryogenic temperatures to be able to achieve. And so they're similar to the cryogenic enhanced vacuum systems that are used in other trapped ion systems. And so it's not super exotic, but it does require lower temperatures to be able to realize that quantum memory.

We're always developing the next generation of all of our hardware. So as Dean put it, mild cryogenic, we hope becomes milder, and we hope the size also of these repeaters shrinks and it should every generation also.

Yes. And then just for you and everybody else, I do understand that diamond memories tend to be cryogenically cooled. I was just wondering if it wasn't cooled, would it be used for compute or sensing or if it always had to be. Okay. And then when you're considering the combination of Oxford Ionics and IonQ, what is the plan with these 2 different processors? Is this -- are we keeping these separate? Or are we putting these together? And then what are the goalposts for emergence? And if you can comment on Iceberg Quantum and how that relates to QBA?

So Tyler, on the 2 different technology stacks, we are absolutely integrating them together. As we look at our integration plans moving forward, right, being able to what Niccolo indicated is putting more qubits on a chip as well as the technology for the quantum memory and doing photon capture on those chips to be able to network them together. That is absolutely coupled technology on the computing side as we kind of scale out. Those different pieces come in at different parts of our road map as we move out to thousands and millions of qubits, but they're definitely intertwined as we move forward.

The next question comes from David Williams with Benchmark.

Congrats on all the really great progress. And I guess maybe first, Niccolo, can you kind of run through just kind of given how much progress you've had, all the exciting things that's going on at IonQ? Is there a way you kind of rank order what gets you most energized and maybe where you're most excited?

There's so much goodness going on in the last 6 months. I don't actually think of it that way. I think that we're in the business of quantum in every sense. And quantum for us is both on the compute side and the networking side. And we care about having the leading technical road map on both sides of the house. We also care about being the leading commercialization player or partner, if you will, on both sides of the house. And we believe that the interconnection of the 2 provides a moat that is very difficult to counteract or amount if you are a competitor of ours. The fact that we can build the world's best quantum networks, quantum computers and we can build the repeaters and we can maintain information security as it's transmitted between quantum computers gives us a phenomenal range of solutions to sell to nations and Fortune 100 companies. If you look at the acquisitions we made and the talent we've attracted, you can see that we are investing on both sides of the house to do exactly what I said. We want to make sure we always have the leading technical road map, the best unit economics and to make sure we continue to win market share. And we'll continue to invest to achieve all 3 or 4 of those objectives. I've been delighted with every acquisition that we've consummated since I assumed this position, and I've been really delighted with the acceleration in global technical talent and talent in general that we've been able to attract. And we're just getting started here, right? I've been in this role for 6, 7 months on a full-time basis. And so I think it bodes very well for the future. We want to carry on doing what we've done in the last 2 or 3 quarters -- in the next 2 or 3 quarters and the next 20 or 30 quarters. The reality is, I think people tend to underestimate how much progress we are making on a monthly, quarterly and annual basis. They tend to underestimate the progress that quantum computing at IonQ is making because of the double exponential nature of improvements in every generation. And they underestimate the need for quantum networking because of the threats, if you will, from not just bad state actors in a classical sense, but because there are bad state actors that are working on so-called Q-Day and cracking RSA2048. And so both sides of our business on the ground and up in space are poised, I think, to have inflection points in the coming quarters and years.

Great. Fantastic color there. And then maybe just for you, Thomas. Given these acquisitions, how should we think about the OpEx trends and maybe the breakeven point there? Is there a potential maybe to accelerate the path to profitability maybe faster than what you thought previously, just kind of given the different revenue bases and opportunities you have in front of you?

I think that our primary objective is to accelerate the road map and also to find and delight customers because this is a giant space and whoever gets there first, and we are the leading contender will reap huge rewards. We obviously will take great care when we decide what to spend on. But right now, we've been able to contract our road map so much that this will save us a lot of money in the long term.

Yes. Look, I'd add to that. I think Thomas is spot on, right? I mean when you look at competitor announcements that have come out subsequent to our June 9 webinar. You've seen big companies putting out announcements about being 5 years behind us. And I think they're the closer competitors, honestly, in the quantum computing space. It is a commanding lead that we have been able to build in the last 6 or 7 months.

The next question is from the line of Kevin Garrigan with Rosenblatt Securities.

Let me echo my congrats on all the progress. Going off of Troy's acquisition question, any other areas of the business you can point out where you might still be missing a piece the puzzle?

Well, look, I mean, I always like to jokingly say that although I'm a physicist, I never finished the PhD. And so our superpower here is I'm not trying to defend my PhD dissertation at any point of the week. I'm happy to defend the PhD dissertations of our fantastic engineering leadership and physicists that we've both hired and acquired, right? And so we're in the early ages and era, if you will, of the quantum revolution, which is the biggest revolution in computing and networking, I think, since computer networking got going, frankly, 80 years ago. And so as we become a bigger business, as Thomas rightly pointed out, where we see opportunities to bring road maps in and move things from -- moving things to the left effectively in our road maps, we'll always look at that. We have a fully-fledged vision, obviously, for the quantum Internet that we talked about in the last couple of calls. The quantum Internet someday will be not only quantum sensors that are capturing information, but quantum computers that are processing that information, performing calculations and quantum networks that allow you to transmit that information and keep it safe throughout the whole system. And so that overall vision is a North Star, if you will, for us. And we intend to be the leader in the quantum Internet and all of its components as that plays out and as there's an acceleration in spend, not just from governments, but from Fortune 100 and Fortune 1000 companies ultimately.

Okay. I appreciate that color. And then as a follow-up, I'm still getting a lot of investor questions regarding the intersection of quantum and AI. So wondering if you can give some details on the collaboration with AIST that is focusing on real-world quantum AI applications and what some of those applications are?

Well, let me talk more generally than just on AIST, right? So if you think about what we announced back in April at World Quantum Day, we showed real-world industrial AI examples in categories like reducing defects in steel and, of course, training generative adversarial networks to learn faster. And we're continuing to see great progress there, right? I mean you can actually look at most of our application successes this year through the lens of machine learning, whether you want to call that AI or branded AI, it depends both up to you and on the specific application. But I would argue that when you have 20x speedups in computational drug design with NVIDIA, AWS, Astra

[Operator Instructions] The next question is from the line of Richard Shannon from Craig-Hallum.

So how many QPU deployments are there between IonQ and Oxford Ionics worldwide? And considering you're securing data in flight, is there any plan to secure stationary data as well?

Yes. So I think the short answer is we have sold all the systems that we've ever made at IonQ, and we continue to do that. Oxford, I think, has sold a system that has been publicly disclosed. I think it's safe to say that there is incredible demand for our 256-qubit system that's around the corner and our 10,000 qubit systems on a combined basis. The quantum networking question you're asking about securing data on the ground, absolutely, right? I'll turn this over to my colleague, Jordan, but we're obviously selling entangled quantum networking solutions and Q gate solutions every day, and we've announced a number of the larger ones. But our businesses have already got quantum networks deployed in places like Tennessee and Korea, and we continue to see incredible demand from household name financial services and telecoms organizations that recognize, as I jokingly like to put it, our quantum networking solution customers are the ones that are not in the news for data breaches. And so I think as people recognize that increasingly, we will see the demand and market penetration skyrocket, honestly. And as soon as there is a whiff of a bad state actor, if you will, making any progress whatsoever on RSA2048 cracking, I think you're going to see orders of magnitude step changes in networking demand.

That's right. And that's data in transit, not data at rest, but that's where QKD offers a massively powerful advantage for our customers in defending. And it's a particularly weak point in their security architectures today and one that we can help them shore up.

Awesome. And then with the combined companies between Oxford Ionics and IonQ, is there a way to run all of these gates in parallel? And how many of these could you effectively run the whole system in parallel using the electrical control? And what does that effectively do to your gate speed? And then also, I just want to say, I'll get off after this, but congratulations on the road map with the logical qubit counts. That's definitely not able to sustain.

Awesome. Well, I'm going to turn this over to Dean. But I think the good news is the short answer is gate speeds are going up considerably as part of this road map and acquisition and merger. But Dean, over to you on the electrical control.

Yes. Thanks, Tyler. So overall, the electronic gate control and the overall move from kind of the 1D architecture to the 2D and just the inherent way those electronic gates work allows for just a massive, I would say, increase in parallelism that can occur as you execute 2 qubit gates. And so you can expect overall throughput to really go through a step change as you go and introduce high-density kind of 2-qubit electronic gate control. And this is coupled with what Niccolo was saying is that there -- it's also just inherently faster from a gate speed perspective. And so when you're working with the qubits in those qubit-based traps, they're just simply faster. And so those 2 coupled together represent just a massive, I would say, overall throughput increase that really just drives also the unit economics that Niccolo was also mentioning before.

All right. Well, I'm going to wrap up by saying that we're pleased to have announced another quarter of progress here at IonQ. Just to recap a couple of our highlights. Firstly, we closed our quantum networking acquisitions of Lightsynq and Capella and announced the pending acquisition of Oxford Ionics, which accelerates our expected compute road map. We will achieve 800 logical qubits in 2027, 80,000 logical qubits in 2030 and expect hundreds of thousands, if not millions of logical qubits beyond that. Secondly, we're attracting and hiring world-class talent from all walks of expertise, which we believe is the greatest indicator of long- term success that we can provide. Thirdly, we raised $1 billion in additional capital to enable IonQ to maintain its decisive lead as a full stack quantum computing and quantum networking company. Fourth, we expanded our global footprint with key government and commercial partnerships, including MOUs with Japan's AIST, G-QuAT, and South Korea's KISTI and a world-first partnership with Astra