Richard R. Hough III
Sure. I'll try to keep my remarks a bit short only because it's a bit open-ended question. You can follow up if you want. I appreciate it. Two questions there. In terms of what we're seeing, with regards to the flows, number 1, that you see, was pretty muted, which is the board I used in my introduction. Considering the volatility and the fact that we're headed into tax season, it was a pretty good quarter actually. But the flows overall, as you saw were muted, this quarter was basically entirely driven by the markets. I would point out that existing net flows for the quarter were just about $163 million out of the firm. Very small number compared to our base. However, it hides a surprisingly strong inflow from some new clients. We had a good quarter doing dollars of inflows into our institutional business. We had a fair bit of new flows in for our high net worth business. And just to give you an idea, just to get a bit of detail here, while it was negative, $162 million, again, just kind of a very small rounding error when it comes to our AUM, that left the firm. There were only five clients that were effectively responsible for close to $400 million dollars of net outflows this quarter. Re-balancing some preparation for taxes, a few other things. So the muted overall flows in terms of history was hiding some really good news underneath the hood, we grew our number of relationships as well. So I'm pretty pleased with all that, especially given the volatility in the markets. In terms of demand in our capabilities. On the institutional side that's just going to be very client-specific in terms of what pieces of their asset allocation they're looking to fill. I can't say there's been some significant shift in the marketplace over this short period of time. The performance in our growth equity strategies has been very good and continues to be, despite, I think the very well publicized volatility, in particular on the growth side of the market. No matter where you're looking, it's clearly in a bear market in certain sectors are areas it's been on the decline for a good year. and our team has done extremely well. So that's going to help us clearly as we try to grow that business. Of the value side had some relative performance challenges. But as you noted in your note, recently, our performance remains quite strong, and it is in periods of like this that we often pick up a lot of good relative performance. It is in periods like this that we serve our client's extremely well, whether that's on the institutional or high net worth side. They are hiring us to be a really steady hand on the tiller and to guide them through volatility like this. In this firm, over 20 years has been through significant periods of volatility, and not to mention the global financial crisis. And it's really when we have the opportunity to shine and where are stable focused on high-quality portfolios and the fundamental attributes of the businesses we invest in really shine. In other ways, I think this firm can benefit because we may be seeing a conclusion to the kind of easy money that has led to a tremendous amount of speculative kind of investing. Where frankly the market in the number of asset classes look like it casino and people chasing the latest shiny object. Putting an end to that and hopefully not abruptly because that can have other economic consequences, but putting an end to that quite frankly is going to be very constructive for firms like ours, whether you're talking about our investment capabilities or frankly you're talking about the ability of this firm to make use of capital in a competitive way and at a high return on equity for our shareholders. So to -- I wanted to be shorter in this comment, but it was just such a big question and I have to address different aspects of it. So if you want to follow up on anything, that's a very general comment about how I see things.