And with that brief introduction and recap, I will now turn to some of the questions that we received by email. Tom had asked, last conference call, you said that, quote, all indications are that GM is growing SPD, or will pretty much in those words. Can you give some details on this? And why do you believe this? Do you have any specifics on that that would be important to investors? Well, let me first by saying that General Motors has adopted SPD-SmartGlass in their flagship electric, the Celestiq. And, they’ve announced continuously now their EV strategy, which is to really introduce a number of much higher volume EV vehicles starting this year. Why am I confident that they're going to expand into other things? Well, simply put, they told me. I'll give you a little bit of the background. Initially, I spoke at a conference on switchable -- well, on glass in general, automotive glass in general. And the head of GM's glass and roof systems attended my presentation and then attended the breakout session that I had hosted, and we spoke afterwards. And about a year later, he told me that they had several car models that they had slated SPD for and asked my advice as to how to proceed with that. And of course, I gave it to them. And they have a number of vehicles that are coming out after the Celestiq. But this is their flagship; this is their bespoke model. It's hand-built and it's a beautiful car. Another question Tom had asked, please talk more about Hyundai, the magic roof, as this was out on the Internet. I know you can't get too specific. And basically, I spent a lot of time on the last conference call speaking about Hyundai as a company and about the Grandeur, the GN7, and some other vehicles that they have. What I'd like to do now is just focus on what's in it for them, what's in it for Hyundai. First of all, to the extent they put this on internal combustion engine vehicles, they're going to save 4 grams per kilometer in CO2 emissions, which is very important, especially in Europe where there's penalties for not hitting CO2 targets. And in general, their fleet will have better gas mileage by using SPD-SmartGlass. If they put it in the electric vehicle area, you're going to get an estimated 5.5% increase in the driving range. And then, of course, you get the halo effect of having what's on Mercedes, McLaren, Cadillac, and Ferrari. So those are reasons that I think Hyundai is on a good path with that. Another question came from Chuck. I will try to just use first names here just to preserve some privacy. With the Dynamic Glass Act passed and other progress happening, when are we going to see a significant number of SPD windows in offices and other buildings? And I will ask you, Chuck, to hold that question because I will answer it in my closing remarks. But then the other question you had is about the Dynamic Glass Act itself. And certainly, that changes the dynamics for the better because it's offering a 30% to 50% tax credit for adoption of smart windows, such as SPD. So that makes the economic equation that much better for people adopting it. This is from David. Many licensees have patents for various SPD uses. Do these licensee patents significantly hinder the implementation of SPD by other licensees? Well, one of the things that we wanted to make sure of is that it won't hinder other licensees from using improvements that develop over the years. So every one of our license agreements has -- if you go look at Section 10.4, usually, of the license agreement, there's a license back Davidthat basically when the license terminates or expires, we get rights and all of the IP related to smart glass and SPD. another question came from William, says, the CHIPS Act with the focus on Made in America brought about by the CHIPS Act. Are there any ramifications for Research Frontiers? Well, we have a number of US-based manufacturers. So to the extent that there's economic advantages for manufacturing in the US, our licensees all have operations here. And also, we have some licensees that are only in America. So that's them. That's good. Okay. This comes from Jeff. Several of the EV makers are in financial difficulty and some will not last long. This will limit use to the major automotive companies, which are harder to gain entry as their planning starts years ago. How do you assess the current market? And then View is in financial difficulty, how does that affect you? Okay. Well, let me you kind of take both questions. So one of the advantages of being in the licensing business is that we can afford to be nice to everybody in the electric vehicle industry. So we really don't have to pick and choose who we work with. Because quite frankly, nobody knows which EV makers are going to be successful and which ones aren't. There was even doubt years ago whether Tesla was going to be able to make more than 10,000 or 20,000 cars a year and they've gotten their act together quite nicely. We expect there to be shakeouts; and I’m a student of business history, . And you probably -- if you think back to the turn of the 20th century, there were so many carmakers. Most didn't make it. So you want to cast a wide net. But being a licensing company, we can. The other part of your question is about if this starts moving only towards established car companies, how does that affect us? Well, one thing I would say is that our bread and butter has been the established car companies: Mercedes, McLaren, General Motors, and Ferrari now. So the fact that we've proven ourselves both from a reliability standpoint, which is something that the existing carmakers certainly admire and respect, has been very beneficial to us. So we have a long track record. And I'd say it's one that is a prestigious track record. And if the electric vehicle market ends up going to the established carmakers, we'll do well. If it goes to some newcomers, we'll also benefit. As far as your question about View and their financial difficulty, yeah, they are not doing very well financially. And we'll probably learn more on March 29 when they have their year-end conference call, which is pretty much the last minute. But they've been somewhat of a negative forcefor the entire architectural smart glass industry. First, they've had financial and accounting issues, plus it's very hard to figure out what a smart window should costs because they've been heavily subsidizing their sales to customers, which is why they ended up losing $260 million last year. So they are doing what they can now as well. Not too much to say other than I wish all of our competitors well. They create a great reference point for a better-performing technology and a real business. And another one comes from Judy. I recently came across this TechCrunch article claiming that the passengers display portion of the Celestiq megascreen will incorporate SPD privacy blinds to minimize driver distraction. Is this fact or fiction? Well, you can always read what reporters will say. But I will say this: some OEMs are working with SPD to minimize driver distraction. And for now, the only thing I'm sure of is that SPD-SmartGlass will be standard on this Celestiq roof. But we certainly have had broad discussions with GM about the benefits of SPD. So nothing here would surprise me on that. Okay. I think we answered most of those questions. From John Roberts, is Resonac, previously known as Showa Denko and Hitachi Chemical, an active licensee producing and selling SPD film? Also, with the passing of the IRA, has REFR architectural glass licensees experienced a material increase in inquiries and sales? Bob, thank you for the questions. Yes, the Inflation Reduction Act, as it was titled when it was introduced, the Dynamic Glass Act certainly changes the economics of buying smart glass or putting it into small and large office buildings and residential buildings and also homes. As far as your question about Hitachi Chemical, as we noted in our 10-K, Hitachi Chemical had sold their division that was doing the SPD film to Showa Denko and has now been rebranded as Resonac Corporation. And they continue to sell film into late 2022. But we think that because this division is part of something that just kind of move from company to company to company, there's the possibility that they may reduce or wind down that business because of this. However, that shouldn't affect us because of Gauzy. This film is comparable in performance and in many cases better than the original film, and it's certainly less expensive, which expands the market. But thank you for that question, Bob. Okay. This is from Claire. I recently saw an ad for an electric BMW that had a sunroof that appeared to be using SPD technology, although the technology was not mentioned in the ad. Do you know if this was SPD technology? Originally, they were using something else, but more often than you could imagine, and I kind of alluded to this before, the OEMs soon realized that other switchable glass technologies like PDLC or electrochromic has problems and, as I mentioned, were selling a new OEM this year for this very reason. So I think that's -- it's good that they're experimenting with things. I think ultimately, when they do the high-volume production and they want the real stuff, they'll use SPD. And I also just want to thank Matt for his kind words about a dear friend who we lost, Ron Rizzato. Ron was a long-time shareholder and broker and really was an amazing person. And I've spoken to Ron many, many times, and I wish his family well and that he rest in peace. I think at this point, we've answered most of the questions or are all the questions that were e-mailed to us. So what I'd like to do now is have Paul open up the floor to any live Q&A that people might have that we haven't touched on already. And then after which I'm going to make some closing remarks here.