Thank you, Steve. So as Steve shared with all of you on the phone, our near term priority remains the delivery of data for NRX-101 in bipolar depression with suicidality, sufficient to trigger the first $10 million milestone payment in our partnership agreement. As you know, we're the first pharmaceutical company to enroll patients with suicidal bipolar depression in a clinical trial of a potentially life-saving oral medicine. These are patients who have been excluded from the clinical trials of all previous anti-depressant drugs. The high-risk nature of this population has required us to take a high level of caution in recruiting, selecting, and monitoring the care of these vulnerable patients. In March, we advised you that the Independent Data Safety Monitoring Board identified no safety concerns and no futility. And now we're pleased to share with you that no unexpected serious adverse events have occurred in this high-risk population since that time. More importantly, clinical trials in psychiatry succeed or fail based on patient compliance with study medicine and the consistency with which depression and other key endpoints are measured from one study to another. And that the things I'm about to talk about are scientifically complex. We've posted a paper to the free-print service, which are free to read and reflect on what I'm about to say. So the quality metrics we're seeing in terms of study retention, safety, medication compliance, and rating reliability give us added confidence that the trial in which we are engaged has the potential to be submitted for drug registration should we prove efficacy. In other words, we don't know that the drug is going to work, but we do have increased confidence that we're measuring the results of the trial in such a way that we will be able to identify efficacy if it's there. We track the execution of this trial in a number of ways on a daily and weekly basis. Today, I'd like to share the results to date from three of the key metrics we evaluate namely compliance with the prescribed treatment; concordance of efficacy evaluations, otherwise known as inter-rater reliability conducted at the study sites compared to those conducted by the central raters at our company; and lastly, patient enrollment. So first, treatment compliance. So far in our trials, we've seen greater than 90% compliance with patients prescribed regimen as measured by pill counts at patient visits. We're encouraged by the high level of compliance as we believe this is key to patients experiencing relief from their symptoms. Now let's talk about concordance or inter-rater reliability. Psychiatry trial is it's either fail based on their ability to control the accuracy with which the endpoints of the trial are measured. In our case, those endpoints are relief from depression and relief from suicidality. During the first quarter of 2023, we refined our ability to validate the psychometric ratings that are used to assess those efficacy endpoints. We rely on a team of veteran psychometric graders, master's level or PhD, who both train the raters at the independent study sites and rate and monitor the technical quality of each rating. In other words, we get an audio file of each and every psychometric rating from the study sites and our in-house raters. We review that information to see whether they agree with the information obtained by the study site. We set a standard that requires the measurements reported from study sites on a patient-by-patient basis to be within 3 points of the master raters score on the standard 60-point Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale or MADRS. This rating scale is the primary efficacy endpoints that FDA has required for all recently approved antidepressant drugs. Now the 3-point standard we prespecified in our protocol is substantially stricter than the looser 6-point standard recommended in the literature. But we felt it was essential to reducing site-to-site variables that diminishes the statistical reliability of psychiatry studies. In fact, people have often asked how can we obtain a statistically significant endpoint in the STABIL-B study with such a small population? And we attribute that to really tight measurements around those endpoints with very low variance to be accounted for. So we also set a standard of 90% or better inter-rater reliability, which is the measure of what percent of ratings meet that 3-point standard. Today, we've posted a research report or blinded results from the first 50 patients enrolled in our clinical trial and interviewed in their primary spoken language, documenting 94% inter-rater reliability across study sites. In other words, we have no idea who is on drug and who's on lurasidone. All we know is how the ratings obtained in the study site stacks up against the ratings obtained from the same patients, same audio files, by our master raters. This finding substantially exceeds their pre-specified baseline requirements and also exceeds the inter-rater reliability that's routinely published in the literature of the trials. We believe that this rigorous approach to measuring our primary endpoints is key to being able to successfully prove efficacy in our clinical trials should there be efficacy to prove. In order to meet our safety objectives, we need the ability to recruit substantial number of patients over a short period of time. As we previously noted in April 2023, we contracted with 1nHealth to initiate a recruitment campaign that may cover up to 45 states in the US to recruit sufficient patients for our Phase 3 program. The company has similarly broadened its previously announced relationship with Science 37, a CRO that's conducting decentralized clinical trials to enroll participants identified by the 1nHealth initiatives and to randomize them to be treated within the broadened clinical trials. So let me explain that process. In most clinical trials, you set up study sites in particular locations. Those study sites recruit patients. They treat patients. They measure the results. But somebody who lives to 100 miles or 50 miles away from those study sites is really unable to participate. Science 37 has the ability to recruit patients nearly anywhere in the country and send a team of nurses to their door in order to administer the investigational medicine, in order to measure the endpoints of the study. So that our dependence on brick-and-mortar study sites is substantially diminished. And now, 1nHealth has additionally engaged The Mighty, a voice-of-a-patient organization with national reach to publicize the clinical trial to their 800,000-plus subscribers, who've indicated a personal focus on bipolar depression and suicidality. And all of you on the phone are welcome to read the latest press articles that The Mighty is sharing with the bipolar community. Based on these broad coordinated efforts, we expect that data will be available near year end of 2023 to meet the Alvogen milestone. As you know, we began talking to public investors about NRX-101 in March 2022 on the tail of the COVID pandemic. And what we've explained the potential impact of our combined formulation of D-cycloserine and lurasidone for bipolar depression, it's also important to recognize the broader applications of this drug class combination. At NRX-101, we discover the unique synergies between NMDA and 5-HT2A-targeted drugs, those being two different chemical receptors in the brain. Specifically that each component effectively block the potential adverse events effect of the other, creating a potent new therapy with an advantageous safety profile. Additionally, we've identified and patented the critical doses at which D-cycloserine may be effective in various conditions. These discoveries are at the core of our company and at the core of our NMDA platform. These discoveries have resulted in a portfolio of 90 patents around the world, 48 of which have now been issued related to the treatment of bipolar depression, major depressive disorder, PTSD, and other central nervous system conditions. Now the Alvogen agreement anticipates that NRx will develop additional products containing D-cycloserine or other NMDA antagonists in combination with one or more antidepressants or anti-psychotic ingredients for use outside the field of bipolar depression with suicidality, such as chronic pain with or without depression and post-traumatic stress disorder or PTSD. Last week, we announced the licensure of Professor Apkarian, carrying patent, for the use of D-cycloserine in the treatment of chronic pain therapy. There are approximately 7 million Americans who live with bipolar disorder and episodes of depression. In contrast, more than 50 million Americans live with chronic pain. Just as those with bipolar depression, suicidality have no approved treatments other than electric shock therapy. Those who live with chronic pain are frequently dependent on opioid-based medications; the risks of which have become tragically visible to all over the past few years. Just a few weeks ago, the White House announced that 165,000 Americans died from opioids annually. We've now posted a paper to the scientific literature, which you can see on our website, documenting more than 20 years of research, which demonstrates the extensive nonclinical and early clinical evidence that D-cycloserine interrupts the pain pathway at each step between the peripheral pain sensors and the central nervous system while potentially decreasing craving for opioids and those who are afflicted with chronic pain. We've recently published peer-reviewed studies documenting that NRX-101 is not neurotoxic and is not addictive. We believe that chronic pain affords a unique opportunity for NRX-101 and for our shareholders. When we began our work in bipolar depression, opioids were a predominant and widely accepted treatment for chronic pain. At that time, market wisdom suggested that non-addictive, innovative, analgesic drugs could not compete effectively with generic opioids. Today, the situation is quite different. Today, an overwhelming shift in public health policy and public awareness, as reflected in the popular press, recent television series, and multi-jurisdictional litigation, documents a widespread movement against the use of opioids and creates a unique opportunity for non-addictive, non-neurotoxic treatments for chronic pain, an established $72 billion market that is expected to grow to more than $100 billion by 2030. Of key importance is the recognition by the US Department of Defense of the 2016 study published by Northwestern University Research Group that identified a statistically significant reduction in pain scores at a 400-milligram daily dose of D-cycloserine. That's the threshold dose that also predicted in our patent portfolio. The DOD acted on this finding by funding a $5 million congressionally directed medical research program award to Northwestern University to study D-cycloserine in several hundred patients with chronic pain. As shown on clinicaltrials.gov, patient recruitment in this trial is complete and study results are anticipated in the near future. Thus, a large public investment in chronic pain therapy, completely non-dilutive to our shareholders, using the key ingredients of our drug, namely D-cycloserine, already has the potential to provide a rapid path to drug approval for the efficacy be shown. The lurasidone component of our drug may also independently treat chronic pain. As previously announced, we've completed our Phase 3 and commercial manufacturing program for NRX-101. This week, we're opening an investigational new drug file with the FDA for use of NRX-101 to treat chronic pain. The rationale for treatments of chronic pain with D-cycloserine is outlined in the review article that we've recently posted and is on our website and in the 2016 scientific paper published by Professor Schnitzer of carrying on their cohorts. In brief, D-cycloserine, which act in NMDA antagonist drug above threshold doses, has demonstrated extensive nonclinical and early clinical efficacy in: one, decreasing the response to no susceptible pain, that is the pain that's triggered by pain receptors in the body; and two, decreasing craving for opioid drugs with evidence that DCS is both non-addictive and non-neurotoxic. Regarding post-traumatic stress disorder or PTSD, we've previously identified the rationale for treating PTSD with NMDA antagonist drug and shared with you evidence that DCS decreases that pure memory associated with PTSD in nonclinical studies. We plan to investigate NRX-101 in PTSD as an additional indication and to commence planning for that Phase 2 clinical trial in 2023. In summary, I believe our progress this quarter solidifies our ability to reach patients with suicidal bipolar depression. While the results of our ongoing trial remain blinded, we've shown scientific evidence that the trial is being effectively executed and rigorously monitored. Additionally, our chronic pain program has expanded the company's market opportunity tenfold and positions the company for future growth with near-term data readouts. Our programs address more than $100 billion in market opportunity while serving patients with significant unmet medical needs. As always, I'd like to express my gratitude to the patients, the NRX team, the clinical trial investigators, and most importantly, you, our shareholders for your continued support. Seth Voorhees will now discuss our financial performance.