Thank you, Andrew. I'd like to take this time to review our corporate strategy with regard to bitcoin and then talk about our going forward strategy. So first, I thought it would be appropriate to do a review of the results of our strategy since August 10, 2020. We're nine days away from the three-year anniversary of us embarking on a bitcoin strategy. And I think it's very significant because August was the doldrums of the summer in 2020 when we were just a few months post-COVID and the entire world was thinking about how to react to these unprecedented times. We started out with a thought how does one preserve wealth in the face of what is likely to be monetary inflation? And as you all recall, interest rates were 0% there, lots of stocks had adjusted, lots of assets were moving around. If we look at the chart in front of us, what you'll see is, the S&P 500 appreciated 37% since then. So, call it, on average about 12% a year for the three years and Nasdaq underperformed the S&P, but 37% is really the hurdle rate for wealth preservation. If you underperform 37%, then presumably you're destroying shareholder value and you're destroying wealth, and if you can outperform the 37%, you're creating wealth. So as we look at these various asset classes, we can see that bitcoin is the winner of the asset class, almost 4 times what the S&P 500 did. So bitcoin performed 100 -- returned 145% in that three-year timeframe. So that's a pretty stunning performance really, in fact, bitcoin's performance outdoes every other asset class and every big tech stock and every enterprise software stock. And so, of course, bitcoin is the most thermodynamically sound asset and our thesis has always been that bitcoin is perfected gold and has all of the attributes of gold, but none of the liabilities of gold, but bitcoin is also a dominant big tech network with all of the attributes or assets of a big tech company, but none of the liabilities of a big tech company. And you can see on the chart, bitcoin is performing like that. Gold is down 3% in those three years. So of all the money that was created -- and you could make the argument that the monetary supply worldwide or at least in the Western world expanded by 37% over that time period. If so, the S&P captured its pro rata fair share of that monetary inflation then Nasdaq fell a bit behind, but gold didn't capture any of it, gold is down 3% and we had a decision to make as company should we actually convert $250 million worth of our cash into gold or $250 million of our cash into bitcoin. And of course, for those of you who have followed us on this entire journey and you play it out, what you can see is that, if we had actually chosen the path of gold, we would have less than $250 million in tangible assets in our treasury right now, and it seems very, very unlikely we would have been able to raise any more capital or develop any shareholder consensus or investor consensus to continue with the strategy. So gold is not bitcoin. Bitcoin is digital gold, but as you can see the difference between the digital thing and the analog thing is plus 145% versus minus 3%. Silver has underperformed gold because silver is less scarce than gold, more of a manufacturable commodity. And bonds have been the worst investment in this asset class, and of course, there's a simple reason why, right? Interest rates were zero and the thinking was they would stay very, very low for a long time and long-term interest rates were very low. And of course, as the interest rates increased over the last three years that undermined the performance of bond portfolios. We all know the story from the insolvent banks that have been under pressure earlier this year. So key assets and indexes tell a story and the story is bitcoin is the winning strategy, S&P is status quo, S&P has a strategy to not lose. Every other strategy with assets is a losing strategy. We see the big tech companies, you would have been better off to invest it in a very tight portfolio, a big tech stocks like Google, Apple and Microsoft than invest in the S&P, that's because they are digital, global monopolies and they're just as powerful today as they were three years ago and they just keep getting more powerful. But it's not always risk free to be in big tech as the results of Meta and Netflix and Amazon indicate that you can underperform the S&P because they're companies. The big winner in the enterprise software space is Oracle, and Oracle is very -- is the primary enterprise software company, always has been the most powerful and dominant one. As you can see IBM, Salesforce.com and SAP have all suffered or underperformed the S&P. So against all of those is the comps, as a business intelligence company, we're an enterprise software company so we compare ourselves to enterprise software stocks, and of course, the best companies in the world, the big tech companies, so we compare ourselves to the big tech stocks. And the question is, how does the mid-sized enterprise software company manage to outperform them all? And the idea was bitcoin, but as you can see and I'm delighted to announce MicroStrategy's not only outperformed all assets, all big tech and all enterprise software stocks, MicroStrategy over that three years has actually outperformed bitcoin itself. Now, that's despite the fact that on August 10th we bought $250 million worth of bitcoin and bitcoin was a small or a fraction of our enterprise value, 20%, 25% probably a 20% of enterprise value is bitcoin at that time. And somehow we've managed to get more than 100% performance. The way we do that is via intelligent active management of our balance sheet by taking on intelligent leverage. And so the conclusion here is, the bitcoin strategy is working, there really isn't any strategy conceivable that could have worked better for us. And of course on a risk-adjusted basis, given all the possible other strategies and the risk they would imply, then bitcoin actually appears to be the least risky strategy to outperform the S&P. There are certain number of characteristics of MicroStrategy that have allowed us to outperform bitcoin and I'd like to delve into those a little bit more in the next slide. The question that pops up a lot is, well if MicroStrategy is going to own bitcoin or so much of it, then why don't I just buy bitcoin, why do I need to buy MicroStrategy? And so that's the first question to ask yourself and I could give an analogy, the analogy is, compare buying a house in the best neighborhood that you can find, that you can purchase today with no money down, have all the cash advance to you by the bank and then you can rent it out as an investment property for investment income versus buying the identical house that might be priced 20% cheaper, but it's located in a scary neighborhood, it's going to take more than a year to purchase and it's going to have to be paid for in cash, you can't finance it. And if you think about those two propositions, you can see the houses are identical, but a 20% discount doesn't adjust for all of the other headaches in acquiring the house and given a choice between the two, 98% or some overwhelming number of homebuyers would buy the house that's easy to buy, that they can finance at the bank. So, MicroStrategy is a security. And so, when I say a good neighborhood what we mean is, you can buy it on -- buy it from your broker, your big bulge bracket bank, maybe it's a Morgan Stanley or JPMorgan or Goldman Sachs. So, an investor can work through the banking relationship they've had for 20 years. And the second thing is, the bank will allow them to finance it so they can buy it for no money down, they can't buy it in a matter of minutes. And with bitcoin, you would have to establish a whole new set of relationships, new custodian relationships, new processes for custody, you have to find a new exchange, it's a little bit of a scary process and it takes a lot of work, it'll take you a year and you have to pay for it all in cash upfront because you can't finance the purchase. So when we talk about ease of access, MicroStrategy versus Bitcoin, you can see that for an investor that just wanted to make an investment quickly, one of them is a quick compliant process that takes a minute with no cash or just very, very convenient routine, all their compliance procedures are the same, all of their compensation structure is the same, their accounting is the same, their charter allows it, it's very easy, whereas buying the bitcoin means you have to rethink all those things and it's going to take a long time and it's going to be difficult. So the second element of this situation is stability downside protection, bitcoin is simply linear up and down, but MicroStrategy has a non Bitcoin business, the Business Intelligence business. So it's an enterprise software company and that means the revenues of the software company and the cash flows of the enterprise software company and the ability to sell equity or to finance things via equity and debt financing against the enterprise software company, they are not correlated to bitcoin. So you've got an uncorrelated business to provide some stability and downside protection if you're an investor. I mean, the third element is, can you actually take on intelligent leverage? With bitcoin, of course, it's just one-to-one, you invest $1 million, you get a $1 million of bitcoin. But with MicroStrategy, we're actually carrying leverage, we have $2.2 billion of leverage against $4.6 billion of bitcoin assets, so call it a loan-to-value that's approaching 50%, but -- of the underlying assets, but the difference is intelligent leverage would be defined as I pay a very low interest rate 1.6%, whereas the federal funds rate is 5% right now and long-term interest rates for junk bonds could be 8%. So 1.6% is good interest rate, the mortgage rate on a 30-year mortgage is something like 7%, so we like low interest. The second element of intelligent leverage is no mark-to-market or margins called potential. You could say that we had to Silvergate loan, we decided it wasn't optimal to keep it so we repaid it and retired it because we didn't want to have that mark-to-market question. And so, all of the debt that we have, the senior secured debt or the convertible debt, it's and assets not marked to market and we don't have to worry about margin call, right, and with regard to the converts, it's junior and unsecured debt. So that's the second really nice element to intelligent leverage. And so, there really isn't any easy way to go and get unsecured low-interest non-mark-to-market debt against bitcoin. It used to be -- you could get mark-to-market expensive margin loans against bitcoin, but the great majority of all the companies that offered mark-to-market margin loans against bitcoin have all gone out of business or been bankrupted. So right now MicroStrategy is fairly unique and the ability that we can very efficiently and safely borrow against this asset and then use that financing in order to buy more bitcoin. I think any consumer, if they had $100,000 a bitcoin and someone said, would you like to be able to borrow $50,000 against it and pay 1% interest with no margin call and have it come due in five years. They would say, well, yes, sign me up, how do I get that loan, right? And so, MicroStrategy offers people the ability to get that kind of intelligent leverage on a bitcoin strategy that you can't get just by buying the bitcoin. You can see in my next column on Generate Yield, MicroStrategy actively manages its business, we're an operating company and so we generate cash flow just like we were able to take $14.4 million of organic cash flow in July and use it to buy bitcoin. Our objective is to find ways to generate incremental bitcoin for our shareholders and do that with either cash flow from the business or do it through intelligent accretive financings of equity or debt or other intelligent operations, and of course, if you just buy the bitcoin you can't generate yield. If we go to risk management, the thing about risk management is MicroStrategy has two different convertible bonds and a senior secured bond, and those are different ways that you can actually get bitcoin exposure without actually having direct linear upside, downside, and so there are risk management options. And then, of course, MicroStrategy has a set of options that trade against our stock puts and calls in a pretty deep option tree and a lot of open interest in those options. And for the most part, people that own the bitcoin itself, they don't have those risk management options to trade in the derivatives, it's tricky to find that and you certainly can't find it easily in the United States. It is true there are some bitcoin derivatives on the CME, but the market is not nearly so well-developed as the market in stock options for well understood NASDAQ traded software companies. And so that's another advantage to our investors. And of course, the last thing you want is you want for performance to track the price and of course, yes, bitcoin obviously track the price of bitcoin and MicroStrategy has been able to outperform the price of bitcoin, but generally at least perform at that level or better. Now, the question that people next to ask us is, well, how does MicroStrategy compare to bitcoin ETF? And so you've got to start with the futures ETF, while the futures ETF is available or they are available right now, but as you can see, they don't have an uncorrelated operating business attached to them for downside protection. They can't use intelligent leverage, they can't issue junk bonds or they can't issue convertible bonds in order to lever up intelligently and cheaply without a mark-to-market risk. They don't generate yield and, in fact, they charge a fee and so MicroStrategy doesn't charge a fee to our investors to manage the $4.6 billion of bitcoin, but at a 100 basis point fee $4.6 billion generates $46 million a year of cost. And so the fees can be expensive and our goal is don't charge the fee, generate the yield. And then, of course, if you go to risk management, there are some options that you can trade on the futures ETF, but you don't have nearly the depth of the derivatives market or open interest and you don't have all the converts. So they don't quite have that kind of risk management opportunity. And then in terms of the performance, the challenge and the open secret in this industry right now is futures ETFs aren't tracking bitcoin, in fact, they're underperforming bitcoin performance this year, I think 30% year-to-date, right. So the futures ETFs have underperformed the bitcoin index 30% year-to-date, bitcoin is up 76%, as I'm speaking to you right now and these futures were up 44%. So, that's a challenge if you're an institutional investor. No one's going to want underperform the index by 10% or 15%. The spot ETF is clearly in demand, right, and you can see that -- you can see why you would want to spot ETF, but they're not available yet. If they do become available, then presumably, they'll be able to track performance much better and they'll still have the other challenges of downside protection intelligent leverage and they won't generate yield or charge a fee. And they are on the horizon, but as you can see, the spot ETFs when they come along, they won't offer the same kind of leverage yield that MicroStrategy offers or the other options that are listening to institutional investors. Gray scale is very famous, but it's an over the counter only instrument and fairly unique. And of course, they're not an operating company so they can't actively manage the business to generate yield and they don't have a healthy open interest and derivatives and they can't take on leverage. And that just leaves you bitcoin miners. Bitcoin miners give your exposure, they're just extremely highly levered exposure on the upside and the downside because their revenues on the upside and their cost, all are very, very volatile and very highly levered. So they are a way for institutions to get involved in the business but they don't have the same mixture of options that MicroStrategy has because we're an operating company. And so, you can see when you look at this chart, how it's possible for MicroStrategy to outperform bitcoin, but I think you can also see by looking at this chart that MicroStrategy's unique investment option for any institutional investor that wants bitcoin exposure that's different than a spot Bitcoin ETF, and so, we expect that we will be a differentiated investment option for bitcoin going forward when or if the spot ETFs are approved. And I think generally, if we look at the outlook for bitcoin, it's never been better, the environment is providing clarity that bitcoin is a global asset that's in demand from institutions all around the world and it's fully decentralized. And so, I think that the next 12 months will bring a good set of milestones for bitcoin adoption, and one of them would be the spot ETF approvals. If those are approved, I think generally, that will be good for the entire asset class and bitcoiners will benefit. There are a whole class of institutional investors that will need our spot ETF to get involved with bitcoin and MicroStrategy wouldn't be the right option for them because they really just need to be able to buy an unlimited amount of bitcoin without worrying about not tracking the bitcoin price and with clarity and transparency. So I think that will expand the pie, I think all of these options generally expand the pie, and MicroStrategy is going to continue to be thoughtful and responsible about managing our business in order to find ways to get incremental bitcoin for our investors. And so, thank you for your support. I guess, I'll pass the floor back to Shirish for questions now.