Thanks, Jeff and again good morning everyone. Before I begin, I would like to mention that we have updated the data for a number of slides that we have provided in the earnings deck last quarter, but we have included them in the appendix this time since that information hasn’t changed a great deal. On today’s call, we will focus primarily on the second quarter trends and some new disclosures that we have provided. Starting on Slide 6, we will take a look at our loan portfolio. Our total loans increased $463 million or 10.6% from the end of the prior quarter. The PPP loans contributed $276 million to our loan growth. Outside of the PPP program, the primary drivers of loan growth were equipment finance loans and leases, consumer loans and a $104 million increase in the utilization of a credit line that we extend to an originator of commercial FHA loans. On Slide 7, we have provided some additional data about our equipment finance portfolio. Through this business, we provide financing solutions on a national basis to equipment vendors and end-users. We had total outstandings of $751 million at June 30 with a weighted average interest rate of 4.84%. The average loan or lease size is just about $130,000 and the largest credit in the portfolio is $1.6 million. It’s a well-diversified portfolio across industries, with trucking and manufacturing being our two largest concentrations at about 20% each. At June 30, we had $233 million of deferrals in that portfolio, which represented about 32%. These deferrals are weighted towards borrowers in the transit and ground transportation, trucking, manufacturing and healthcare industries. And from a geographic perspective, the two states with the most deferrals were California and Florida, comprising 16% and 14% of the deferrals respectively, with no other states accounting for more than 10%. In the first round of equipment financing deferrals, we generally granted each borrower’s request if it seemed clear, their business was likely to be hurt by the pandemic. For any second deferrals, we plan to do additional analysis for each request. At this point, based on our customer surveys, we are expecting about $77 million of the equipment finance portfolio or approximately 10% will need a second deferral and will be weighted heavily to the transit and ground transportation sector. On Slide 8, we have provided an overview of our hotel motel portfolio. Including both the commercial real estate and commercial loans in this industry, we had $173 million of loans outstanding as of June 30. We have 57 loans in this portfolio with an average loan size of $3 million. The largest loan in the portfolio is $11 million and that loan has an LTV or a loan to value of 56%. Overall, it is a very conservatively underwritten portfolio, with an average LTV of 54% and more than 90% of the properties are national chains. We extended deferrals on $146 million of these loans. And given that business and leisure travel remained below a normalized level at this point, we estimate that approximately $124 million of these loans will require a second deferral. Looking at Slide 9, we have provided some information on the consumer loan portfolio that we have through our relationship with GreenSky. Most of these credits are low dollar instalment loans used for home improvement projects. At June 30, we had $681 million outstanding in this portfolio, with an average loan size of just under $2,300. The average FICO score of these borrowers is 746. The portfolio has proven to be a very strong performer throughout the pandemic as the delinquency rate has declined every month this year and stood at just 34 basis points at June 30. The structure of our agreement with GreenSky provides for very strong credit enhancements in this portfolio. The first enhancement is a cash flow waterfall structure, under which the cash flow from the overall portfolio is applied to loan servicing fees, credit losses in an agreed upon target margin for all loan originations. Only any excess cash flow is payable to GreenSky as an incentive fee. And due to the strong performance of the portfolio, GreenSky has earned incentive fees in 17 of the past 18 months, including every month this year. The second enhancement is the escrow funds held by Midland, which are available to cover any deficiency in Midland’s principal or target margin. These escrow funds are increased or decreased monthly based on their originations and payoffs and typically range in the 4% to 4.5% range of total GreenSky loans held by Midland. At June 30, this escrow account stood at $29.5 million, which represents 4.3% of the total loans in the portfolio. This has been a very successful program for Midland as we have experienced no charge-offs in this portfolio in the 9 years that we have been partnering with GreenSky. Turning to Slide 10, we will take a look at our deposits. Total deposits increased $292 million, or 6.3% from the prior quarter. The growth was entirely attributable to increases in core deposits primarily from commercial customers with a portion of that being PPP funds that were deposited at the bank. The growth in our core deposits continued the positive trend in the remixing of our deposit portfolio as we use core deposits to replace $76 million of higher cost CDs that ran off during the quarter. We have also had a significant decrease in the cost of funds. Following the Fed’s lowering of rates in March, we continued to aggressively re-price deposits into the second quarter and between CDs that matured and rolled over into lower-priced CDs or other transaction accounts and other deposits that r-priced lower, we have brought our cost of funds down from 74 basis points to 45 basis points. Looking at Slide 11, we will walk through the trends in our net interest income and margin. Our net interest income increased 5% from the prior quarter, mostly as a result of higher average loan balances and the reduction in interest expense. Excluding the impact of accretion income, our net interest margin declined 12 basis points. This was primarily due to excess liquidity that was invested in lower yielding earning assets, the addition of low interest PPP loans and the re-pricing of our variable rate loans. This was partially offset by a 29 basis point decline in our cost of deposits due to reductions in our deposit rates and the improved mix of deposits. Approximately $193 million of CDs with a weighted average rate of 2.14% matured during the course of the quarter. Approximately 60% of these CDs renewed at lower rates and the remaining funds flowing into other transaction deposit accounts. And finally, on an accounting note, we are amortizing the PPP loan fees over the 24-month term of these loans. Turning to Slide 12, I would like to provide some information on some of the factors that will impact our margin going forward. We also have a number of other opportunities to lower funding costs in the third quarter. We have $107 million in time deposits with a weighted average rate of 1.36% that are scheduled to mature over the course of the quarter. We also have $183 million in money market accounts that have teaser rates of 1.6% that are scheduled to re-price this quarter. Also, as we mentioned last quarter, in June, we had $30 million of sub-debt become callable, which we did not call and those notes have now moved to their specified floating rate structure, which will reduce the interest rate by approximately 130 basis points. As an offset, we plan to continue building liquidity on the balance sheet, while we manage through the impact of the pandemic, which will continue to put pressure on our net interest margin. But when we start to see PPP loans for being forgiven, we will accelerate the recognition of the loan fees, which will benefit our margin. Turning to Slide 13, we will look at trends in our wealth management business. Our total assets under administration increased $286 million from the end of the prior quarter, primarily due to improved market performance. Our total revenue was up slightly from the prior quarter due to the increase in total assets. That was partially offset by lower trust fees following the larger amount we recognized last quarter related to tax preparation. On Slide 14, we will take a look at non-interest income. We had an increase of 125.6%, this quarter following the $8.5 million impairment of commercial mortgage servicing rights that reduced our non-interest income in the prior quarter. Excluding the impairment, the increase of 13.5% was primarily due to the strong performances of our commercial FHA and residential mortgage banking groups that Jeff previously discussed. Turning to Slide 15, we will review our non-interest expense. We had a couple of minor adjustments this quarter to backup non-core expense items for a small loss on residential mortgage servicing rights held-for-sale and integration and acquisition expenses. After backing out the adjustments for each quarter, our non-interest expense declined by approximately $600,000 from the prior quarter. The decrease was primarily due to lower salaries and employee benefits expense resulting from the full quarter impact of the staffing level adjustments that we made during the first quarter. With the strong revenue generation we had this quarter and the decline in expense levels, our efficiency ratio improved to 58.5% in the second quarter. Turning to Slide 16, we will look at our asset quality trends. As Jeff mentioned, we continued to see relatively stable trends despite the impact of the pandemic. Our non-performing loans increased by approximately $2 million during the quarter due to two loans totaling $7 million being moved to non-performing offset by transfers to other real estate owned. But as a percentage of total loans, our non-performing loans declined to 1.25% from 1.33% at the end of the prior quarter. We have $3.1 million of net charge-offs or 26 basis points of average loans. We recorded a provision for loan losses of $11.6 million as we continue to build our level of reserves in light of the pandemic. At June 30, approximately 96% of our allowance for credit losses was allocated to general reserves. On Slide 17, we show the components of the change in our ACL from the end of the prior quarter. Our ACL increased by $8.6 million and strengthened our reserve to 97 basis points of total loans from 88 basis points at the end of the prior quarter. Approximately $5.4 million of this increase was attributable to changes in our portfolio largely resulting from new loans, downgrades to risk ratings and loan deferrals. The other major driver of the build was $2.9 million added as a result of a downgrade in the economic forecast. On Slide 18, we show our ACL broken out by portfolio. Relative to last quarter, the most significant reserve builds occurred in our owner-occupied and non owner-occupied CRE portfolios, which now have allowances of 1.27% and 1.37% held against them respectively. In addition, as previously mentioned by Jeff at the beginning of the call, when excluding loan portfolios with certain credit enhancements or government guarantees, including the PPP portfolio our GreenSky loans and a commercial FHA warehouse line, our ACL increased to 1.21% of total loans compared to 0.99% of total loans at the end of the prior quarter. And with that, I will turn the call back over to Jeff. Jeff?