Thank you, Stephen, and hi, everybody. First quarter results are never a particularly interesting topic from a financial perspective. Over the past 4 to 5 years, our Q1 revenues have never represented more than 15% of our full year results, which is not a great starting point when looking at most P&L metrics. Nonetheless, as we are always on the lookout for ways to add transparency to our business while being mindful of the confidentiality of data with respect to our partners, I wanted to highlight some increased disclosures we have made in the presentation deck that we include along with our earnings releases. You've heard us talk about our core business of evergreen brands, categories and play patterns. But investors who are less familiar with the toy space are sometimes challenged to understand the combination of our core evergreen business and the additional product lines enabled by new entertainment. Our daily objective is expanding those core evergreen product lines into more points of distribution and deeper buys. But our existence adjacent to the entertainment and gaming industries occasionally provides us with another lever to pull for more volume and margin on top of that core business. For recent years, our published financial data disclosed net sales organized by 4 operating divisions: action play and collectibles, dolls role play and dress up, outdoor seasonal toys and consumer products, and our costume business. And we will continue to share those results going forward. But as we've crunched the numbers more and discussed internally, it's the latter 2 businesses, seasonal and costumes, which we have concluded are somewhat less sensitive to new entertainment. Unless someone makes a movie about ball pits, we're generally going to sell a certain number of ball pits every year. And what drives the numbers, more individual retailers tweaking their dedicated shelf space and/or our portion of that space more than entertainment driving more per capita consumption. As support for that argument, I'll point out how the seasonal business has struggled in recent years as the larger cube footprint of a lot of the items suffered through high container costs, inventory backups and retailers taking a more critical view of allocating floor space to those items, especially after selling a lot of them during COVID. The costumes business similarly is trying to find its footing in a post-COVID world as 2020, 2021, 2022 have probably been the most unpredictable years in the business for a really long time. But on the flip side, it's the action figures and doll business, where the new entertainment will generate an entirely new product line of anywhere from 6 to a couple dozen unique SKUs, as opposed to one or 2 new ball pits taking the place of last year's ball pits. And those new product ranges will get dedicated shelf space for a season or two or end-cap placement or out-of-aisle pallets or all of the above. Retailers who only carry toys for a portion of the year will be looking to stock these hottest on-trend properties, and that's the lift that the right entertainment releases can generate. So informed by that understanding of the business, we went back and essentially recut the 2 divisions that we've been disclosing previously and created an alternate view of them to provide you with a better understanding of how the underlying business is performing. We can do that in part because our licensing agreements require us to be very precise on what we report back to the licensors. And a new film property will almost always have a unique packaging look. It's the only place you can find new characters unique to that film, where our day-in, day-out evergreen product will be reported separately and found in different packaging. To be clear, in any given year, we're bringing to market over 40 different product lines, representing an even broader array of characters and, of course, selling across all the major markets of the world. By extension, each of those lines are their own unique business, and it's the accumulated portfolio that we check in and talk about on a quarterly basis. I subject you to all that as a bit of a back story to understand the nuance there. As much as we're not thrilled with top line being down, the data supports what we know to be true, that our underlying core business has steadily expanded over the past few years, even while we benefited from some exceptional upsides driven by films and episodic TV at the same time. That's the best insight I can think of to provide as it relates to sales. I know some of you are now asking, yes, but what the heck is going on with margins? Fair question. It's a bunch of different things as it turns out, which tend to pile up on each other when they appear all at once. Product margin was something of a tight rope and likely will be most of the year. The newest hottest product tends to sell through cleanly and secure the best margins at the beginning of the product life cycle. So based upon what we've said about the first half, you know we don't have that working in our favor. Lower royalties may help you a bit here, but you have both volume and rate components there. The films in the back half should help. We have 2 in particular that we're excited about, but we had one last year that we were excited about back then. So the year-over-year excitement increment, from a margin point of view at least, is really only one noteworthy film that doesn't release until December, that being Sonic 3. Rough numbers, we usually see 25% to 30% of marginal sales flow through to EBITDA. So in summary, I'd say sales volume created a $4 million to $5 million negative comp this quarter. Issue number two, the cleanup on aisle 7 of the aforementioned disappointing Q4 2023 theatrical release. Should this topic be somewhat done and resolved now? Yes, we hope so. I would say this was as big of an issue as issue #1 in the quarter, if not a bit more. You have product on shelf, product in the warehouse, product and components in anticipation of spring orders, all of which is suddenly a bit ill-advised when the consumer isn't responding. We are moving on. Separate but related, call it 2B. Beginning in the second half of last year and so far this year, we are seeing a return to more pre-COVID-like levels of product needing more price promotion to sell through cleanly. This can be a very challenging area to forecast prospectively as you are inevitably presuming recent results will be indicative of future performance. But the alternative is to presume everything will be awesome and nothing bad will ever happen, and that's not responsible or GAAP either. So assume there was a bit of this happening in Q1 as well. But with all those thoughts in mind, we still feel we are running a business that will generate a gross margin percentage that starts with a 3, despite what Q1 might imply. Issue number three. We are spending more money on G&A areas, as we've said in recent quarters. Our focus in 2020 and 2021 was survival and fixing the balance sheet. 2022 was a wild ride chasing a great revenue year. 2023 and now 2024 are gradually tuning up the organization, processes and infrastructure for the next wave of revenue growth. Unfortunately, at a time where everything tends to cost more than it did prior, that can be a bad look when revenues and gross margins are down. Some of the spending that's happening in G&A is going to persist for a time until the revenue line makes it seem less notable or we get to better places from an efficiency point of view. That said, you're not going to see us leaning into talking about "onetime" projects and backing those numbers out. That's not in our plans. Some of these efforts are tallying up to 6-digit spend on a full year basis to give you an order of magnitude. But we wanted to point it out, as they're real as much as we're trying to self-fund as much as we can by cutting back in other places. We're simply trying to manage the business for the long term as much as that sounds like an obvious thing to say. And some of that work is driving spending in areas where we've been lighter the past couple of years. That's in addition to the reality of the cost for most SG&A areas tend to be running higher year-over-year on a rate basis, which we know is a phenomenon not unique to us. Finally, four, it's a small revenue quarter. Someone knocking over a vase in the lobby impacts the bottom line. No, that didn't really happen. But metaphorically, it does happen from time to time over the course of the year. Q1 seemed to have more than its fair share, low 7 digits. In addition, there were some timing elements in total that were unfavorable for the quarter, but ideally will just prove to be some full year spending being pulled forward a bit more than 2023. That's it for the P&L. Balance sheet. Stephen has talked about the preferred. Happy to not be talking about them anymore. We were on a path to start paying the dividends in cash this year to stop the accretion. So the fact that we're not eliminates about $1.7 million in cash that would have gone out the door and represents nearly 10% of the cash payment we did make in closing the transaction. That payment is digging deep into the bank account for us given the time of the year. Not unlike when we paid off the term loan last June, we have enough confidence in our outlook for the balance of the year that we can take the calculated risk to extend ourselves cash-wise without jeopardizing our overall liquidity. As of April 22, our total cash on hand was around $22 million as an additional reference point for you. Next, I wanted to update the narrative a bit on capital allocation. As Stephen mentioned, the preferred redemption opportunity surfaced on relatively short notice. So something we contemplated as more of a 2025 scenario has accelerated on us. We are being more diligent in monitoring cash given the unscheduled outflow and have a path forward to get to the end of the year with the backstop of our credit line. Separately, we are going deeper than we would otherwise in our 2025 and 2026 projections to give us the best view of liquidity and the related sensitivities. As that work is ongoing, there are 4 areas that are floating to the surface as key considerations, which I'll run through you without a rank order of importance. Working capital is clearly one. You've heard us talk about ramping up our international footprint. We know that sales outside of North America are a meaningful opportunity. The breadth and depth of our current product portfolio and the proof point around sales in the U.S. position us well to reengage key international markets to ensure we are on shelf year-round in all the key categories and at all the key accounts. We are moving people around, rejuggling organizations, questioning why we do things the way we've always done them and all of those fun things. A second area is M&A. As many of you know, JAKKS was built on M&A over the years. And walking through the showroom, you can see how our company today is really, in many ways, the accumulation of those acquisitions, well over 50% of our total sales volume. That said, we do not anticipate anything changing from an investment thesis perspective. It would have to be the right assets. Importantly, priced at the right level that clearly fit in our go-to-markets today. We are not looking to diversify our business model or extend into services or anything like that. One of the first questions we always ask is, could we see JAKKS successfully selling this product line, to give you some insight as to how we view this topic. Third is acquiring new licenses. We have found over time that securing the right license is a less risky, less expensive way to enter new categories than M&A, even if it might mean a slower build. Nonetheless, it does tend to require our investing cash ahead of revenue between satisfying the licensor, ensuring we have the right internal resources to be successful, and the associated product development work. Fourth on the list is capital return. We know that return of capital to shareholders is an important consideration for investors when a company is not in hyper growth mode. It was a key consideration in the retirement of the preferred shares. Some of these uses of capital are more lasting and visible than others. So we are being rigorous in our assessment of how those balance out as you would hope us to be. Finally, as some of you know, the world of sell-side equity research has undergone a lot of change over the past 20 years and continues to do so. Recently, the lead analyst covering our stock moved on to a new role, so we wish him well with that. With that in mind, we're probably not going to have any questions at the end of the prepared remarks this quarter, just so you know why. But if you want to send something in to
[email protected] e-mail address during the call, we'll see if we can work it in. Or if there are questions or observations you wish were being surfaced in our quarterly narratives, feel free to funnel them through that address, which is also tagged to our earnings release. And we'll add it to the consideration set going forward or we can try to work you into the list of follow-up investor calls that we conduct regularly. And now I'll pass things back to Stephen.