Thank you, Stephen, and hi everybody. As Stephen mentioned, its first quarter, so this will be a bit light as there's only so much to say about these months given our seasonality. I'm going to jump into margin, which as we hoped was much better than prior year, as our prior year number was terrible in part reflecting excessive container costs. Q1 is always our smallest quarter, so trying to extrapolate our results to the balance of the year is challenging, however tempting. With that said, although there's a lot of moving pieces here, I'd break down margin in the quarter to say we had around 700 basis point benefit on the container issue, which we then gave back about 100 basis points in royalty expense and another 150 basis points in product margin. Last year we had new product blowing through at full price. This year we had a bit more closing out of slower moving inventory and product a bit further along in its life cycle. And the outdoor seasonal business which was down, is often no or lower royalty compared to the rest of the portfolio. As we look forward, we still hope to see gross margins improve, but the most horrific freight comps are behind us as it relates to the dollars expensed, and now we move into the higher volume quarters, so you have two reasons why percentage margin expansion shrinks. Beyond that, how well we do will depend more about how product margins play out. Full year royalty expense in 2022 was 15.9%, and we wouldn't expect that to be much higher this year, maybe a little better, but the quarterization can move around. So you're left with a modestly improving freight story, fighting it out with the product margin line, inclusive of how clean the product is selling through at retail and how aggressively we're managing our own inventory. Moving down the P&L, we saw higher spending and direct selling year-over-year, which was cleaning up the excess warehousing situation we discussed last quarter. We are out of the overflow space in the U.S., but still working through some issues in Europe. Again, in a smaller quarter, everything tends to stick out. We're also seeing some year-over-year higher expenses as trade shows return to the industry. The European show in Nuremberg happened in Q1, and currently people are planning for the New York Toy Fair to return for the first time as a fall show in late September, early October. And we're certainly seeing a lot more traffic thresholds in Santa Monica, specifically in the past several weeks. Business travel is back, at least at JAKKS. G&A expenses were roughly in line with our expectations. One of the more unfavorable drivers was an increase in stock compensation expense. Going back to mid-2021, we've made a point of utilizing restricted stock as a mechanism to reward and retain senior staff. Given the company's challenges pre-restructuring, that wasn't a lever we were able to pull for several years, which left us at a competitive disadvantage compared to other larger players in our space, we felt. So we're happy to have that be part of the narrative again, as well as how it aligns with long-term incentives internally. But from a P&L perspective, one starts with a base close to zero for a large number of employees, building up over time given a three-year vesting horizon. In total, that expense was a bit over $5 million in 2022, and we'd expect it to be closer to $9 million in calendar year 2023. Interest expense in the quarter was $3 million compared to $2.2 million last year. $927,000 of that unfavorability or $0.10 per share in EPS, which is not an adjustment we make in our non-GAAP reporting, was accelerated write-off of deferred financing costs and debt discounts attributable to our accelerated long-term debt pay-down. Another $150,000 was prepayment fees, as discussed during the last call, which is something we adjust out for non-GAAP EPS reporting. This account also absorbs some expenses associated with early payment discounts, which we occasionally utilize with some key customers to further optimize our working capital, as well as banking-related fees and expenses. Our term loan interest is certainly lower, given the lower principal balance, but it's still the case that we have expenses for other things throughout the year showing up here. Our variable term loan rate is currently above 11%. Now, a quick word about taxes. Avid readers are aware that our 10-K filing was delayed, but nonetheless filed a couple weeks ago. The review of our 382 tax situation ended up taking longer than anticipated. We do have some differences in the financial tables compared to what we shared during the last earnings call, primarily in the areas of taxes payable and our deferred tax asset balance and the related valuation allowance. I'd encourage you to reference our thoughtful narration in the 10-K for more details on the topic. As many of you know, taxes are something of an ongoing journey as one makes quarterly provisions and ultimately, but separately, files tax returns in various jurisdictions. Suffice to say, tax is an ever-present topic given our global business structure, and we continue to spend time and energy thoughtfully assessing what we're doing there as we aspire to do with all forms of expenditure. Elsewhere, the marking-to-market of our preferred stock liability resulted in a non-cash gain of $147,000. We backed that gain out of our non-GAAP calculations of adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EPS. The cumulative accrued PIK dividends are now $4.9 million on top of the underlying par value of $20 million. In aggregate, our adjusted EBITDA for the quarter is a negative $1.1 million versus a positive $1.9 million last year. Our trailing 12-month adjusted EBITDA is now $73.3 million or 9.4% of net sales, which was $53.6 million and 8.1% of net sales at this time in 2022. Now, checking in on the balance sheet, as of March 31, our debt, net of debt discounts and amortization was $29.4 million. We had no draw on our credit line. The current payoff level of our term loan is $30.2 million. Adjusted EPS for the quarter was a loss of $0.40 per share, $0.12 worse than the Q1, 2022 loss per share of $0.28 per share. And with that, I will now hand the call back over to Stephen for some additional commentary.