Thank you for the question. A very, a very good question. I'll try to answer your question, perhaps on a - on three to four different levels. First, let me start with the broad macro picture, which we have no control over. But it's important anyways. I think the regulations in China, they are targeting the Internet giants. They show their tendency to monopolize as well as sort of sensitive industries like the tutor industry and the food delivery and so on and so forth. But based on our own experience dealing with regulators and different levels of government in China, we strongly believe that biotech is not only an industry that they would not target, but is actually one of the industries that they are actively promoting. It is very important to realize that biotech industry is one of the high tech industries in China, which will help create lot of social benefits and externalities for the government in China. So it's important to realize that and also because biotech industry is not an industry where foreign ownership is banned or restricted. So most of - as I remember, as far as I can remember all of the biotech companies do not need to adopt a VIE structure or VIE structure, which is also, I believe, one of the topics that brought some concerns from investors. So short answer on the macro picture is we think and I think most of our peers would agree that biotech industry will actually receive increasingly more support from the government in the - from different levels of government in China. And I would add to this point that recently if you look at some of the western KOLs for example Ray Dalio from Bridgewater, the head of MSCI China and the Capital Group, they have all made relatively optimistic remarks about the - what's called the investability of Chinese stock market and also overall the picture about regulation in China. So I would encourage you to look at that as well. I think the second point is in relation to our own business model and the quality of our assets. We have a very, very highly differentiated pipeline. Our pipeline has either no first-mover assets or highly differentiated potentially best-in-class assets, both in China and globally. So we think that some of the issues you may be seeing in China for example the cost containment from the NRDL perhaps in relation to sectors like PD1. We think, we are relatively insulated from that because a, our assets for example CD47 lemzoparlimab, most of the value we think will be coming from China - territories outside of China for example bio partnership with AbbVie and we'll continue to do that for other assets like CD73 and other assets down the road. So if you look at a lifecycle of assets like that, we think the economic value of these assets will not be limited. Most of the value will not be limited to the market in China. Secondly, even in the Chinese marketplace because we're not in crowded or super crowded sectors like PD1 or PD-L1 and maybe others, our experience and the estimation is that because of the highly differentiated nature of our assets and the less crowded competition structure in these segments, we think we will face a less harsh or more accommodative pricing structure in China, even in a Chinese marketplace. So if you combine these two points, we think we're relatively well positioned in terms of dealing with some of the potential headwinds you may see - you may be seeing in the NRDL tendering process. The third point, I want to make is, as I discussed the financial section in the - in early part of this call, we actually, actively diversifying our listing values. So we have kicked off the STAR Market listing process in Shanghai. We're also considering an additional dual listing in Hong Kong, all of that will also help us to manage some of the geopolitical risk and also diversify our shareholder base and I think, potentially or probably will also lower our overall cost of capital. So very, very good. We think, we're making very good moves to manage that part of the risk space. I think, lastly, the - that the biopharma sector, our biotech sector in China has seen some relatively big volatilities in the last few weeks and we're probably no exception to that, but I want to emphasize that the volatility in the stock price has nothing to do with our fundamentals. As you can see, we are making so much progress in the last, in the first six months of this year, we actually making significantly more progress than we thought when we did the business planning at the end of last year or beginning of this year. We are very, very happy with where we are and we are optimistic about the future of this company. We had been in close communication with some of the major shareholders of the company and they share the same view with us and they are - they remain long term supporters of the company. So I want to end on that note and to give the floor back to the host.