Thanks Mike. So thanks for that question. Let me – obviously, there are two very, very important questions in there. And I guess I’ll really just to back it out even further is clearly, the quarter was impacted by 3 main factors. One, obviously, being the workers comp. And so part of the reason why we are saying, for example, no meaningful improvement will occur until basically Q2 of 2024 is because our renewal is March 1 for our workers comp program. So some of the things that we’ve identified that we need to change, like I said, we’re locked into our policy. We’re locked into our policy until March 1. The – but the other things are as far as from an elevated standpoint, our – some of them are a little bit – some of them – how can I put this? We’re not – the reality is, and it maybe was put in a little bit. It was put in subtly. But basically, obviously, you have medical inflation that’s taking place. You have wage inflation, and yet you have workers comp rates that have dropped. Now part of it, we suspect and we think that workers comp rates can’t keep going down at a time when the cost of workers comp generally, the components obviously being indemnity benefits, which are tied to higher wages and medical costs, which, of course, are subject to a lot of medical inflation. So it’s hard for – frankly, it’s hard for me to imagine that rates won’t go back up. And to the extent that rates go back up, it assists us in then. But I have – we literally – in that area, we have literally no control. One of the other factors that has happened to us over time is as we’ve drifted from more, let’s say, a far more heavy concentration in construction to one that’s more industrial and warehouse and professional and clerical. And this is one of the areas where we’ll definitely be working with our carriers. We’re not comfortable that, that we’ve been giving credit on our fixed cost sufficient for the fact that our claims or that are payroll has moved more towards basically less risky work. And our – and so we’re going to definitely work with them on bringing that fixed cost component down as well, just based on our sort of general risk profile. That said, the last year, our actual losses have not been – has really have been relatively speaking, worse than, let’s say, the last 30 years – not massively. I’m not suggesting that, that’s part of it, but it was a relatively bad year. Of course, that hurts us in our argument with the carrier that they need to reduce their base key. But the net result is, as we have had a bit more of a trend towards higher overall claims. And I would add that, for example, because they become – they’re a pretty good comparison towards for us is TrueBlue, for example, I know, booked a big reserve adjustment as well for their workers comp, which would just simply say that they’re experiencing, what we’re experiencing, which then I go back to the first point of it’s hard to imagine workers comp rates generally continuing to go down at a time when claims are going up. Now that said, so year-to-date, we’re something like $4.4 million behind the prior year comparison. How much do that do we start recovering in 2024? I’m not – I don’t think we’ll recover all of it. So I’m not – so I want to make sure everybody understands, I’m not just trying to paint a happy face on something. That said, I do think that we will make meaningful progress on bringing that back to a more normal level. So your question as far as like, do I expect it to be $1.5 million a quarter? No, I don’t expect it to be $1.5 million a quarter of cost, but whereas for the prior 3 years, it had been a benefit. I’m not expecting that – I’m not expecting that, either. As far as the other SG&A expenses, the – and as was stated in the sort of – in the presentation, the – by the end of September, we have pretty much eliminated most, I’ll say, extraneous expenses that were sort of planned as we integrated MRINetwork. And so there will still be a bit of an improvement on that in Q4 simply because there were certain expenses that did in fact linger into Q3, but Q3 did not contain nearly as much as, let’s say, Q1 and Q2. So it’s not going to be – it will be a relatively – it will be a relatively minor improvement. But I want to be really clear on, and sometimes it becomes a really difficult concept sort of to explain or to at least see directly is obviously, we added a fairly significant amount of employees and expenses for the MRINetwork acquisition. And professional recruiting support is different than – not completely different, but is somewhat distinct from, let’s say, the services that we provide to our Snelling and HireQuest Direct franchises. And so it’s not like you can just sort of integrate them all together and say, okay, our system-wide sales are just X-plus Y and we just can run at the same rate. It’s not that way. We have separate individuals that obviously support each division. So here’s where that’s important, and this is where it bears into the future, and it bears a great deal of understanding, or it bears to understand it in order to understand our Q3 results and sort of what’s sort of going forward. So I don’t want anybody to go away thinking, well, MRINetwork acquisition was a disaster. It’s not the case. It’s been – it’s been profitable for us. And given elevated interest rates, even if you allocate all of our interest expense to the acquisition, it is still cash flow positive and how we generally buy companies, the multiple of EBITDA that we look to buy companies at, it’s still squarely in the middle of it. Now it’s not quite the home one, we had hoped to hit, because obviously, it has been a challenging economic environment. But I just don’t want people to go away thinking yes, your SG&A is up in an absolute sense, which it is, the MRINetwork is comfortably profitable. Now the reality is, is that, if you recall in Q1, our system-wide sales and our revenues were excluding MRI, were roughly flat with the prior year. And it was basically at the end of March that we started seeing a, I would call it, a noticeable, a noticeable decline in our system-wide sales in, in the HireQuest Direct, but more specifically or more noticeably in the Snelling – on the Snelling side. And that continued into Q2 - Q3 probably even deteriorated a little bit more than Q2, but it’s fairly – I would say that it’s fairly stable, fairly stable, but obviously at lower levels. So to the extent that our SG&A expenses are higher on a relative basis, it’s because of the operating leverage that we lost in the – basically on the Snelling and HireQuest Direct side. And obviously, that goes to part of what is important about the, the TEC acquisition is that, in reality, we’ll be able to add that $34 million of system-wide sales on. Well, we didn’t – we have basically the same perm staff right now than what we had, let’s say, in April of this year, because we spent 2 years hanging off of dear life trying to keep our good staff, and we knew already in May, we’ve probably engaged with TEC already back in May, along with a few other – along with a few other prospective acquisitions. So we were expecting to be able to recover our operating leverage. And so anyway, going forward, to the extent that we’re tracking back to sort of where is our SG&A relative to what it was in the past, we absolutely expect by Q1, assuming no major changes and no major changes in, no major changes in the economy or no other major acquisitions is that we should be sort of back at a level of SG&A relative to our revenue excluding workers’ comp also keeping that thrown out. But by Q1, it will be at normal – we will be at normal levels in Q1. I hope that answers your question. I know that was a really, really, really long answer, but...