Thanks Jack. Now turning to Slide 7. HighPeak's EBITDAX per BOE continues a commanding lead amongst our peer group. Said differently, no other public company can generate close to the same EBITDAX that HighPeak does on 50,000 BOEs a day, thanks to our very oily mix at low OpEx. The cartoon on Slide 7 shows how efficiently HighPeak converts our oily BOEs into cash. Starting from left to right on the slide, HighPeak's BOE is 75% oil and 88% liquids versus our peer average of 45% oil, plus HighPeak's efficiency of converting that higher realized price per BOE to EBITDAX is higher than our peers. HighPeak converts 80% of our realized price to EBITDAX. That compares to our peers converting only 70%. Beginning with a significantly higher BOE value than our peers, and converting at a greater percentage of that price into EBITDAX results in a substantially higher EBITDAX per BOE. And in our third quarter, our unhedged EBITDAX per BOE remained strong, and differential at $45.68 per BOE. HighPeak's EBITDAX per BOE continues to be over 65% higher than our peer group average. The operations team has done a fantastic job, building one of the most efficient machines in the business. These efficiencies are extremely sticky. By that I mean they're here to stay. This is very important when a company has multiple decades of sub $50 breakeven inventory to exploit, and equates to significant value creation. Jack mentioned a 100-year flood that caused HighPeak roughly 800 high oil cut BOEs during the third quarter per day. We also had an additional expense in Q3 for repairing that flood damage, with fewer BOEs to allocate for the quarter. Had this not happened, we would be on pace to exit the quarter at or below the midpoint of the LOE guide. This gives us confidence to reaffirm the LOE guide. There's always wood to chop on the LOE front. The team continues to find innovative ways to reduce costs, which will further widen the gap between HighPeak and our peers. Now turning to Slide 8. Let's talk about some recent well results. We are continuing to see very positive performance from wells in our northern and northeastern extension areas in Flat Top, as well as some of our upside target zones. First, let's discuss our Kallus well. This well is HighPeak's first operated Middle Spraberry well. Our Kallus well achieved a Max Oil IP of roughly 1,500 barrels of oil per day, plus associated gas out of a 2-mile lateral, far exceeding our initial Middle Spraberry expectations. And as you can see on the production chart on Slide 8, the Kallus well is also outperforming our bread-and-butter Wolfcamp A type curve. I would like to point out that the landing point in the Middle Spraberry formation is approximately 800 feet above where we land in the Lower Spraberry formation, which we believe will allow us to efficiently and effectively develop areas of the field, where we already have drilled Lower Spraberry wells without seeing any parent-child influence. We have identified approximately 300 Middle Spraberry locations across our acreage. Note, we have obviously, drilled through the Middle Spraberry formation on every well, that we have drilled to date, since all were drilled to deeper zones. We have collected extensive data on this zone, and that makes this test a technical no-brainer. Utilizing our current well cost and the initial performance of the Kallus well equates to a lot of additional HighPeak inventory that will break even at well below $50 a barrel. This Middle Spraberry inventory resides in our 2,600 total well inventory that HighPeak carries. But these continued results like this and much of that inventory will surely migrate over and add to our current 1,150 sub $50 breakeven locations. And I know that HighPeak and I believe that our investors and the industry as a whole would all agree that, we would all take a 1,500 barrel oil well per day, at a cost well below $6 million, and we would take those all day long. We've also highlighted our Judith well on Slide 8. This well is HighPeak's furthest east, operated producing Wolfcamp A well, which has demonstrated very strong performance to date. This well reached an oil IP of 1,700 barrels of oil per day, plus associated gas. Over the first roughly five months of production, since the well initially cut oil, it has produced over 135,000 barrels of oil, outperforming the conservative type curve we have for this area. This data point is further proof that our primary zones are good across our entire acreage position. In addition, as we mentioned last quarter's update, the results of our first handful of wells in our northern most extension area of Flat Top, both in the Wolfcamp A and Lower Spraberry formations are continuing to exhibit very strong early performance. We anticipate providing additional production details next quarter. But as a preview, our Lower Spraberry and Wolfcamp A results in this extension area are performing as good as or better than the core development in Flat Top, nearly 10 miles south, again underscoring our already sizable and differentiated inventory of sub-$50 breakeven runway, this area undeniably has legs. Now, turning to Slide 9. As Jack mentioned earlier, our drilling and completions group has done a tremendous job of reducing our cost structure to drill, complete and equip our wells. All in D, C, E & F that has facilities as well, costs are currently running 9% below the cost we achieved in Q1 of this year. We have seen the usual suspects contribute to those cost reductions, rig rates, stimulation cost per pumping hour, OTCG pricing, fuel cost, and incremental performance improvements. But let's talk a little about what folks are missing about HighPeak's cost structure. Let's start from some -- a truth that everybody has bought into overtime. That truth is that the Delaware Basin is more expensive than the Midland Basin proper to drill and complete wells, to the tune of almost $3 million per well. Now, the returns compete, in both basins, because the production and value are almost proportional to the differences in cost. Midland Basin costs are less due to the structural nature of the wells. What does that mean? The Midland Basin is shallower, has lower pressure, requires less horsepower to complete the wells. The industry and investors have accepted this fact. Public sources also do a decent job accounting for average regional descriptions of these costs. However, utilizing a regional cost structure for HighPeak would lead the public to miss the extraordinary efficiency, value, and runway that HighPeak offers. So how does the Delaware Basin to Midland Basin comparison relate to the HighPeak's acreage, which resides on the eastern side of the Midland Basin? We enjoy similar structural differences to the center part of the basin as the Midland Basin does to the Delaware Basin. Our zones are shallower than our peers out to the west in the Midland Basin. Obviously, that means less total footage to drill, less pipe, less cement, less time, and variable cost. All in, this equates to less D, C, E & F costs. Our frac pressures are significantly lower than our other public peers in the Midland Basin, requiring far less horsepower, fewer pump trucks and therefore significantly less fuel. Having access to all of the recycled stimulation fluid that we need, and ultra-local wet sand enhance our environmental stewardship, and greatly reduce our capital requirements. Those lower stimulation pressures, roughly 30% lower, allow HighPeak to further optimize the tubular goods used, which reduce and significantly reduce the additional savings or increase the additional savings for our wells at HighPeak. So why is this important and what are folks missing? It's no secret that HighPeak's BOEs generate significantly higher EBITDAX per BOE compared to our peers, mainly driven by our high oil cut. But what's the read through? We make similar oil recoveries, but make less natural gas. However, gas and NGLs are only about 1% of HighPeak's total revenue. They are closer to 10% give or take of our peers' revenue in the center part of the Midland Basin. So distilling all of this down, being able to generate slightly less revenue per well, i.e. the gas, but doing it at less than 75% of the comparable cost, wins the race for generating shareholder value every time. And having multiple decades of this inventory that will allow HighPeak to continue this performance for the foreseeable future is the value that the market has yet to grasp. Now turning to Slide 10. ESG is ingrained in every aspect of HighPeak's operational and strategic planning. We continue to build large central tank batteries that meet all regulatory requirements. Use 100% of ultra-local wet sand, reducing cost and associated emissions, we continue to use recycled stimulation fluid and have the capacity to supply multiple frac crews. We continue to build out oil infrastructure to our newer acreage blocks. Oil on pipe garners a better-realized price per barrel and reduces emissions. We have electrified field-wide and continue to run our two rigs off of high-line power. Our solar farm supplants 10,000 metric tons of CO2 per year, and the electricity from the solar farm is cheaper than grid power, so it also reduces HighPeak's CapEx and OpEx. We have continued to expand our low-pressure gas gathering system to HighPeak's new acreage, eliminating the need for flaring. With our gas gatherer's addition of compression, and processing throughput HighPeak has enjoyed lower field-wide pressures, equating to slightly higher natural gas production. HighPeak prioritizes ESG initiatives throughout all operational and governance decisions. Doing the right thing is not only the right thing to do, but more often than not, it is also the right financial decision for our shareholders. With my comments now complete, I'll turn the call back over to Jack to wrap things up.