C. Mills
All right. Thank you, Matt, and it's hard to imagine that any part of this presentation could get better than our forward-looking statement slide, but I'm going to give it a shot here. We have some new people on our call with us today. So we're going to go over a little bit of the background and history of the company, but we've got a whole lot of exciting stuff to talk about. I hope you got a chance to see the earnings release that was just put out. But we'll be going through that. Matt will be taking us through some of the financial components. And then at the end, obviously, we'll be happy to take your question. So Elutia, our mission humanizing medicine so that patients can thrive without compromise. We are a commercial stage company now with a $27 million revenue run rate and growing on the backs of 2 proprietary product platforms. Our CanGaroo product platform, which is used to protect implantable pacemakers and electronic devices and our SimpliDerm product line, which is used in breast reconstruction. But very excitingly, we are pioneering the drug-eluting biomatrix and we use that to solve very serious problems with implantable devices that currently are not addressed by the state-of-the-art technology. Importantly, we expect FDA clearance of our first drug-eluting biologic CanGarooRM in June coming up right now. And I'll go over this, but that gives us the ability to jump into a $600 million device protection market within pacemakers that really is right for disruption. So let's jump into it. Okay. So from a business highlight for the first quarter, we had another exceptional first quarter, but this one was really quite a standout $6.7 million in revenue for the quarter, it puts us at a run rate of about $27 million. SimpliDerm from a revenue standpoint was the real star with sales surging 55% in the quarter. And then obviously, all eyes are on our CanGarooRM product line, and we expect clearance for that now in June of this quarter coming up. A little bit of background. So what we do at this company is, we are pioneering the drug-eluting biologic, and we do that by taking natural biological matrices and adding a pharmaceutical payload to that by combining those 2 things, we are able to create products that have a regenerative component, as well as a pharmaceutical component. So it's really the idea is the best of both worlds, being able to have an implant that incorporates and regenerates in your own healthy tissue, but also deliver active pharmaceutical agents that are able to impact things, such as postoperative infections. And we're really excited about what that technology brings us. So with that said, let's jump into our first application of this, which is on our CanGaroo product line and CanGarooRM the next one coming up. So this is -- CanGaroo is a product -- the CanGaroo line is a product that's used in the CIED or basically pacemaker and internal defibrillator space. So each year, there are about 500,000 pacemakers that are placed. There's really only 4 significant players in the pacemaker field. Medtronic has 40% market share in that space, with the other 60% divided between Boston Scientific and Abbott at about 25% each and then Biotronik, a bit of a distant fourth at 10%. And so this is the marketplace in which we are able to not compete with, but instead actually facilitate and make these implantable pacemakers perform better in the patients that they're intended to help. So why do we need CanGaroo or CanGarooRM? This is what it can look like for somebody receiving a pacemaker. And so some of the comorbidities and problems that these patients and their physician face, things like thin skin, you can see in the picture on the left there, you have no problem identifying the pacemaker and the lead wire even coming off of it. If you look closely, you might be able to see the serial number on the pacemaker. But this idea of a patient with thinner skin and having this pacemaker place directly underneath that skin really sets off a cascade of events. And so one of them is migration. So the next picture over to the right, you can see an arrow where the actual incision was and the pacemaker was placed. And you can see that this pacemaker is rotating laterally towards the arm pit. And that starts in motion a series of events that can lead to problems. One is you can have tension and pulling on the leads and those leads could dislodge. But another thing that you can see happen here is the pacemaker can move and have micromotion against the skin, and that can lead the pacemaker erosion, which is the next picture over. And so if you're not sure how big of a problem pacemaker erosion can be. Well, the third picture over, you can see pacemakers literally dangling from this patient outside of his body. That's obviously not a sustainable picture, somebody has to go back into the operating room and have that fixed. In the meantime, it's pulling on those leads, which are supposed to be placed firmly in the right ventricle. And that can lead to, obviously, failure to pace. And then lastly, it's this idea of infection. So anytime you're putting a long-term implantable device into a patient, particularly those that have comorbidities such as things like smoking or obesity or type 2 diabetes, you're at a significant risk for postoperative infection and that can be a really catastrophic event in patients who need pacemakers. So the problem that we're trying to address is the most common type of failure that you see with pacemakers. Pacemakers themselves generally don't fail very often. They don't spontaneously break, most failures with pacemakers occur at the device host interface, just like I've shown here. And that's actually what we're trying to address with CanGaroo and CanGarooRM. The first real entrant into this space that we're now playing in as a product called TYRX that was introduced originally by a company called TYRX, that shortly after their product was approved, the product was acquired by Medtronic. And TYRX is a fully synthetic polymer that you place the pacemaker inside of, it dissolves and as it dissolves, it elutes off different rifampin and minocycline. And the thing here that TYRX and ultimately, Medtronic got right was this idea of having antibiotic protection around a pacemaker implantation procedure was something that resonated with the electrophysiologists that are putting these in. And since TYRX was acquired by Medtronic back in 2014 for about $200 million, they have really taken this market, and they have created a market where there was none. We estimate they do about $250 million to $300 million a year in this space with this product. That's a market we think we can do better in. And it's a market that we think we can disrupt by having powerful antibiotics like rifampin and minocycline, but instead of the synthetic pouch moving over to one that's a more natural regenerative biologic matrix. So you're getting all the benefits of having antibiotic illusion, but in one that's able to address some of the complications of thin skin and migration and fibrosis and inflammation and all of these other things. In fact, we did a market survey when we went out and talked to electrophysiologists that we're using TYRX as part of their cases, 88% of them an overwhelming majority said they would move some or all of their business to a biologic envelope like CanGarooRM when it came out. And so we view this not as a competitive product in this $600 million market with only one player. But we actually view it as a superior product, and we're super excited about getting it approved and launching it. So that said, let's give you an update on where we are in our path towards FDA clearance. So we submitted our combination product filing in December of this year. It's gone through a pretty significant review with FDA. All of our interactions to date have been very positive. We are now working through, I would say, the very final details. We expect to close out all of those details within the month. And that would then put us on track for an FDA decision in June. And where we stand right now, we fully expect that to be a favorable decision. After that, we've got to take this product to market. And so just a little bit of an overview on our commercialization strategy following approval. We see 2 groups of customers as our first -- really our first and second tier. That first tier are those customers and those centers that are currently using CanGaroo, our base product. We have 356 centers right now that currently have CanGaroo on formulary. And we think flipping those centers into CanGarooRM and going after existing sales there would provide us about $25 million of revenue opportunity that we see as fairly low hanging fruit. Right behind that, though, are those electrophysiologists that are currently using Abbott and Boston pacemakers, but they're putting a TYRX, a Medtronic product around that. There's about $75 million of TYRX business we estimate there. So you put those 2 together, and we think fairly low-hanging fruit, there's about $100 million of revenue opportunity for us to go after first, and that's -- that's really our first tier approach. Beyond that, we do think we have a superior product, and so we are going to go after those Medtronic TYRX customers. And also, those currently right now that are on the sidelines that aren't using an envelope in their procedures, we think there's significant benefit for them to switch over and use CanGarooRM. As such, we are -- we have started scaling our production at our manufacturing site in Atlanta, Georgia in preparation of a launch in the second half of the year. So that's where we are with our CanGaroo and CanGarooRM product line. Next, it would be almost impossible for us to go through this call. I've not mentioned the standout performance of our SimpliDerm product. So as a little bit of background, the role of a biomatrix in breast reconstruction, there are about 13% of women, unfortunately, that will develop some form of invasive breast cancer in their lifetime. In the United States, that leads to about 151,000 mastectomies each year, somewhere between 50% to 60% of those will actually be bilateral mastectomies. You put all that together, the breast reconstruction market in the United States alone is about a $1.6 million addressable market. And that is a market that really hasn't seen a whole lot of improvement for innovation. And that's really what we're looking to do. Again, just like we're executing in the pacemaker protection space, where we've had some good technology, but it's frankly, it's gotten a little stale. And we think we can go in there and disrupt it. We see the same opportunity here in the breast reconstruction space, to come along with second-generation and next-generation products and really provide the patients with superior outcome. Let me show you a little bit what we mean here with SimpliDerm, is getting some questions about why it is that SimpliDerm is performing so well in the marketplace. Sort of take you through a bit of a store here, but it starts out first with -- the first thing the surgeon sees, they're looking for a conforming and flexible product. You see SimpliDerm draped over a curved con towards surface and how well it's able to comply with that surface. Imagine that going around the complex services of a breast implant or an expander implant. It's the right look, fit and feel. It's pre hydrated. So that means the surgeon is able to open it up directly onto the operating field. It's already -- it comes terminally sterilized in a sterility assurance level of 10 to the minus 6. And so right away, the surgeon is able to open up this product directly on to the surgical field and use it like any other surgical, if any other surgical tool used in the procedure, this one is a fully compatible biologic product. And so as we were making this product, we were developing this product, one of the most important things we were doing was we were trying to develop a proprietary process -- processing methodology that would minimize the inflammatory response and therefore, minimize the potential foreign body and fibrotic response that could sometimes happen. And we think we did a pretty good job with it. So I'm going to show you some -- now some pretty impressive data. This was data that was posted from a nonhuman primate model. So these are primate having a SimpliDerm implanted into them. And we use actually as a control here the market leaders is ALADERM. And so the first thing you're looking at the graph at the left is that you're looking at TNF alpha response in the nonhuman primate model at 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 6 weeks. And you can see statistically significant reduction in TNF alpha. So what is TNF alpha? It's a chemokine marker of inflammation that's seen in all different kinds of inflammatory responses. Look at it -- okay, so that's kind of interesting. What does that mean? Well, if you look in the histology from this on the right, you could see where ours are. The ours are stained for CD68. CD68 is a marker that we use to depict different types of inflammatory cells. This one happens to be looking at macrophages that would be attacking foreign body substances. And so you put these 2 things together, and what this is showing is that there is significantly less foreign body response and inflammation in the animals that are receiving SimpliDerm versus those that are receiving AlloDerm and that comes from that proprietary processing methodology that we develop. So you might look at all of that and say, "Okay, Randy, I got it. Why do I care?" Well, you go to the next slide and it sort of paints this all up because -- at the patient level, this is where this matters. This is a publication done looking at -- what's called red breast syndrome with acellular dermal matrix. And so sometimes when you're doing these change, it can be up to 10% of the time, when you're doing a breast reconstruction procedure, the patient can have a significant postoperative inflammatory response and have so much inflammation that becomes very painful and unacceptable, frankly, for the patients that have to go back in and they have to change out. So this is a case study that was done where another acellular dermal matrix was used in the reconstruction procedure, it led to this red breast syndrome, it was intolerable for the patient, patient had to go back into the operating room. They changed it out for SimpliDerm and the Red Breast Syndrome was able to go away. This is a direct result of that less immunogenic product that causes less inflammatory response, less a -- reduced cellular inflammatory response and ultimately, a better outcome for the patient. So that's what -- that's the sort of the science behind why everyone is so excited about SimpliDerm in these breast reconstruction procedures. And then you could see it pay off commercially for us. So absolutely stellar quarter again for SimpliDerm, growing 55% in the quarter. We distribute SimpliDerm 2 ways. One is through our highly trained proprietary internal distributors. We also, last year, signed a nonexclusive partnership with Sientra. They went through some disruption in the first quarter. And I would say this 55% growth is despite of that disruption with Sientra, they were recently acquired by Tiger that could be beneficial -- sort of, I would say, it still remains to be seen. But we have our own network of distributors that are just crushing it. So we are super excited about what's going on with both our CanGaroo product and our SimpliDerm product in the breast reconstruction space, and it's really starting to show in everything about how this company is evolving into a real serious commercial companies. So with that, I will stop for a minute or 2 and allow our CFO, Matt Ferguson, to walk you through some of the financials, Matt.