Hey, George. Good to hear from you again. Yes. In fact, I was at NARUC. I had the opportunity to meet with a few commissioners and specifically talk with them about connectivity, about the importance of connectivity, and how they are navigating all of the challenges they are seeing across the industry with large investments being asked for and affordability. It is on their mind. And in fact, one of the commissioners I spoke with is a commissioner that was familiar with this whole movement of connecting devices and the importance of it for utilities going all the way back to my first company, Silver Spring Networks, when we touched so many homes and businesses across the entire United States. And so this came up, and this was part of the conversation. And it was on their mind, and we enjoyed—I enjoyed—these conversations and connecting with some of these commissioners. They get it. They see this as important. They see this as a way to keep customers informed, safe, secure, enabling utilities to be responsive when the power is out. And the risk of not having that kind of connectivity, the risk of not having that kind of responsiveness and securing the grid is a great risk. Our message resonates with that audience as well, which I touched on a little bit of the regulation support where I am not just only referring to the FCC support, but across the board because our message resonates. We are proven, therefore eliminating this—you know, utilities often do not like to be first. Well, the next utility is not first anymore. The risk aspect of it is easier for regulators to say, wow. You have eight customers out there. You saw it yourself, George, in our booth, of the testimonies that are being had and how it is making an impact and lighting up their grid and allowing them to be more responsive to outages and collect and connect their critical infrastructure. So commissioners are seeing that same message. Our economics are very strong. The nature of how we have proven this technology and validated by some of the most leading utilities in the nation is strong. And so I think it was—I was pleased compared to one year ago right when I first started, there was not this level of conversation about private broadband wireless. And part of that is that now we are seeing utilities with real success stories talking about it, which you witnessed yourself at DISTRIBUTECH. And that is permeating across every aspect of this industry, our customers, our partners, and now on the regulation side. I thank you for that, George. I love the question. There are a lot of flashbacks I get to that journey that we took with Silver Spring Networks. And, you know, sharing with the team some of the recollections I had and having had been working with Ross Perot for so many years before I started Silver Spring Networks, and he always said he saw so many companies get to where the table was set, ready to go sweep the table and just sweep the opportunities, and they do not think big enough and strategic enough. And at Silver Spring, we did have that kind of network effect where we won one on each side of the country and then literally swept the table across the entire nation as utilities started to stand up, talk about it, advocate our brand, what we were doing. We made it easy for them to have successful deployments. What we have here at Anterix is a table that is set that we did not have 20 years ago when we started Silver Spring. We did not have eight customers that were advocating for us. We did not have a multibillion dollar pipeline of opportunities. We did not have cash and a balance sheet the way we have cash and the balance sheet now. We had a handful of engineers, did not have the strength and the depth of an experienced leadership team at the table. And we yet have that now. And we have the tools and we have the opportunity right here in front of us to think big and really be that change agent that utilities are asking us to be. And so it is—not exactly the same, I like where we are. In fact, I told the team last night, I love where we are at right now. I just absolutely love it. And where we are today versus anything I have seen, and I put it up against any company that you can start the race with, the tools and what we have to work with clearly puts us in a strong lead, and we plan to keep it. It is another great question, George. You know, there is probably close to $8 for every dollar that is spent on us that have historically flown around us versus through us. And that is something that, with the appointment of a chief product officer, we are changing. These two products that we launched, just to give you an idea, are—there is one particular utility that we are in deep discussions with that are interested in both products. And it is a significant increase—I do not want to give percentages yet, but I will say it is a significant increase of just the wireless spectrum alone. There is not a lot of risk. They deliver strong margins, and they are long term, and they are recurring, and they are sticky. All the things that you would love to have that underpins a strong recurring business that is being built as a result of the asset that we have and the success of selling that asset. So it is really—it is a very synergistic kind of opportunity of products that we are getting pulled into naturally by existing customers and they are being built as a result of what we are selling and what we have as an asset. And the reason that is important is one of the other things that—lessons learned and leadership lessons learned—is you do not want to go just chasing everything that moves in order to, you know, try to grab revenue here and grab revenue there because it takes the team away from maniacal singular focus on what we are here to do. And these products are naturally connected to everything Anterix has done and the preparations we have made and what I have called before the superpowers in this company of wireless spectrum leadership. And so I like the products. That gives you a little bit of an idea, hopefully, of the kind of dollars that are there and available. And I guess I will just dismount off of this question with a final comment. And that is, you know, when I use Evergy as an example and I threw out San Diego as an example, and frankly, we could talk about every one of our current customers of what they are doing. For them, they told me in live conversations, this will help them move faster. They are frustrated that sometimes they do not have the skills and the focus internally to stand these networks up once they make the purchases of spectrum. So the tower access and the SIM management piece of that are first stop whenever the spectrum gets purchased. And for them, it reduces complexity. It is good for them. They like it. We make the contracting easy. And it is not a lot of risk, margins. And it is really immediately profitable, generating some nice recurring. But it does not stop there. It also is what we have noticed is helping the prospects that have been at the table that we have been in discussions with, that they now know what the second and third step is once they make a spectrum decision. Versus saying, okay. Now I have got to figure out the next many steps in this long journey to having millions of devices connected. We make it easier for them. We make it a safer place that they can step onto, not just because of the testimonials and the support they are getting from our large customer base now, but we can make it easy for them to get started to actually getting real results of—you know, reducing that time to value is very important to them, and therefore, very important to us.