Thank you, Jorik, and good morning, everyone. Fourth quarter revenue was $37.5 million, up $0.2 million compared with the prior year period as growth in our Product ID slightly more than offset our lower Aerospace revenue. Tariff mitigation actions contributed approximately $0.6 million to revenue in the quarter, and the foreign currency translation provided a $0.8 million benefit. For the full year, revenue was $150.5 million compared with $151.3 million last year. As Jorik noted, second half revenue grew nearly 4% over the first half, and the demand we are building from our sales efforts supports our expectation for mid-single-digit growth in our fiscal 2027. Please turn to Slide 5. Gross profit for the fourth quarter was $11.3 million and gross margin was 30.2%, reflecting a contraction of 250 to 260 basis points year-over-year, primarily to lower volume and mix. On a non-GAAP basis, gross profit was $11.9 million and non-GAAP gross margin was 31.7%. It is also worth noting that the second half gross profit increased 8% and margin expanded 130 basis points. Given our size, quarter-to-quarter comparisons can sometimes mask the changes occurring in the business, and we believe the trailing periods since our second half reset provide a better view of the progress we are making with our strategy. Turning to Slide 6. Last year's fourth quarter was impacted by a $13.4 million goodwill impairment charge, which makes the year-over-year comparison less meaningful. Here, too, the first half and second half comparison is more realistic. Under new leadership, we had $1.3 million in operating profit in the second half of fiscal '26 compared with the loss in the first half. On a non-GAAP basis, operating profit grew by more than 90% and operating margin expanded 220 basis points. Turning to Slide 7. You can see our adjusted EBITDA performance. Starting with GAAP results. Net loss for the quarter was $1.1 million or $0.15 per diluted share versus a net loss of $15.6 million or $2.07 per share in the prior year quarter, which again included the goodwill impairment charge. Non-GAAP net loss was $0.3 million or $0.04 per share. Adjusted EBITDA in the fourth quarter grew 18% to $3.3 million, while adjusted EBITDA margin expanded 130 basis points to 8.8%. For the full fiscal year 2026, adjusted EBITDA was $12.7 million, up $0.4 million, and adjusted EBITDA margin improved 20 basis points to 8.4%. Comparing the second half with the first half, adjusted EBITDA grew 44% and margin expanded 270 basis points, again, demonstrating the progress resulting from the actions we have taken across the organization. If you turn to Slide 8, I'll review our improved cash generation, debt reduction and liquidity. Cash provided by operating activities in the fourth quarter was $3.7 million compared with $2.5 million in the prior year period, reflecting stronger cash earnings and lower working capital needs, particularly inventory. For the full year, cash from operations was $11.7 million, a meaningful improvement over fiscal 2025. Capital expenditures were tightly controlled at $0.3 million for the year compared with $1.2 million in the prior year. This also highlights capital-light nature of our business. We use the stronger cash generation to further deleverage the balance sheet. During the fourth quarter, we reduced debt by $2.7 million, bringing total debt to $37.6 million as of January 31, 2026, down from the $46.7 million at the end of fiscal 2025. We ended the year with $4.1 million of cash and cash equivalents and total liquidity of $15.9 million, including $11.8 million of borrowing capacity on our revolver. Our net debt leverage ratio was 2.97 at year-end, well inside our 4.5 covenant, and our fixed charge coverage ratio was 1.43 versus the 1.05 requirement. Overall, we are pleased with the progress we have made in strengthening the balance sheet and enhancing our financial flexibility. Turning to Slide 9. I'll briefly review orders and backlog. As most of you know, our orders can vary from period to period, especially in Aerospace because of the size and timing of customer projects. So quarter-to-quarter order patterns do not necessarily reflect underlying demand. Total orders in the quarter of $41.1 million were up 6.5% over the prior year period, driven by over 12% growth in the Product ID orders. Demand for our label printing products has improved with renewed energy and focus of our sales and marketing organization. Aerospace demand, which is subject to customer project timing reflects improved aircraft build by the major OEMs. At year-end, backlog of $25.5 million was down from $28.3 million in the prior year. During the second half, we reduced our backlog in our Mail & Sheet/Flatpack Printers that was long past overdue by improving productivity in the operation. As Jorik mentioned, we have added leadership talent in both the segment for both operations and sales that we expect to help further drive demand and production output while streamlining costs. Aerospace backlog was up 17.6%, driven by increasing demand from our OEMs and the timing of deliveries. With that, please turn to Slide 10, and I'll hand the call back to Jorik to discuss our outlook.