Thanks, Greg and good morning everybody. Let me begin by reviewing our first quarter financial results taking a look at slide eight. Revenue for the quarter was $33 million it was down 7% from the prior year period due to the lower sales in both P&I and the T&M segments. Greg touched on some of that. Despite the decrease, gross margin increased to 36.3%, up 130 basis points from the same period last year, with higher margins in both segments reflecting favorable mix and cost trends. A quick comment on operating expenses, which are under control and in good shape. We have done some minor and I think, immaterial reallocations of expenses in our income statement segment reporting in response to the new and more rigorous accounting rules on segment reporting. So in the first quarter, operating expenses were down about $300,000 but were approximately 3% year-over-year to $10.6 million. But under the recasting we did for this new compliance requirement about $250,000 of that was reallocated manufacturing expenses. So the total expenses were only down slightly. If you look at the prior expense allocation, selling and marketing would have been down about $200,000, R&D up about $200,000 due to product development, G&A about flat, and gross profit would have been about $250,000 higher. We are not going to report on these before and after comparisons and changes after this quarter because these already small differences between methods are expected to decline substantially in future quarter comparisons, and the new method, frankly is more representative of the underlying economics. Overall though total company spending, operating and manufacturing, is over $1 million lower than the first quarter last year, which is a result primarily of our prior restructuring and an overall focus on spending. When we announced the restructuring last August we projected an anticipated annual cost savings of about $2.4 million. As our business has developed since then, it is becoming a little bit harder to track those cost savings down to reportable detail for you. But we are clearly going in the right direction, and we'll meet or exceed those targets. And that's a major reason we are able to maintain 4.1% margin despite the $2.5 million decline on revenue on a year-over-year basis, which as Greg explained was depressed due to what we think are temporary issues. Adjusted EBITDA of $2.5 million was 7.5% of revenue in the quarter was down just under $600,000 or 19% from last year when EBITDA margin was 8.6%, again primarily due to what we think are the temporary revenue issues. Despite the lower revenue, we began the year with a profitable first quarter, reporting diluted EPS of $0.15 compared to $0.11 in the first quarter last year. Bookings in the quarter were $33.1 million compared to $38.4 million last year. But I've cautioned repeatedly about relying too heavily on this metric as an indicator of short-term performance because of the lumpy nature of the order intake in our T&M segment, which is what explains most of the difference in the quarterly comparisons though we did see lower backlog in our PI segment relating to supplies for inkjet printers, in turn related to the previously discussed retrofit program involving some printers affected by one supplier's quality and reliability issues. Turning to Slide 9. PI segment revenue was $23.2 million in the first quarter compared with $25.1 million in the fiscal 2024 first quarter, primarily due to the delayed shipments of the significant PI order resulting from the customer specification change that Greg talked about in his remarks. But those shipments will flow through soon. Segment operating profit in PI was $3 million or 12.9% of segment revenue compared with $2.5 million or 10% of segment revenue last year. The increase in operating margin is more favorable mix and expense control. In the Test & Measurement segment, first quarter revenue was $9.6 million -- excuse me $9.8 million compared to $10.3 million last year. While the demand remains strong and trends positively in Q1, as Greg said we are unable to ship over $3 million in orders from commercial Aerospace customers, as a result of the supplier shortages of printheads used in some quite legacy products. It hurt OEM printer shipments but also noticeably delayed some profitable repair volume as well. We are working closely with those suppliers and expect to have the shortages resolved by the third quarter of this year but beginning in Q2. Longer-term, as Greg noted the way these sorts of issues get sorted out is through the transition to the -- of most of the AstroNova Aerospace customers to the newer more ToughWriter products. With those factors as explanation, segment operating profit was $1.7 million or 17.6% of segment revenue compared to segment operating profit of $2.1 million or 20.1% of segment revenue in the first quarter last year. Turning to Slide 10, which I won't read. Supplies accounted for 57% of revenue in the first quarter versus 54% in Q1 last year. Hardware accounted for about 27% of revenue down 6 points from last year, stemming in large part from the supply shortage and order deferral issues. The service/other category made up just over 16% of revenue in the quarter up from 13.2% in Q1 of last year and that, primarily due to the T&M segment. I will conclude my remarks by talking about our balance sheet and cash flow highlights that are outlined on Slide 11. Cash and equivalents at the end of the first quarter were $4 million, down from about $500,000 higher at the end of the prior fiscal year. And that range is about where we are likely to remain at quarter end as long as we have debt outstanding. It is close to the minimum levels we're currently comfortable having after accounting for the needs of our various operating subsidiaries globally. We generated $6.9 million cash from operations during the quarter and we reduced the revolving debt by $5.5 million. Debt at the end of the quarter was $15.6 million, and our bank-calculated debt trailing 12-month EBITDA-to-debt ratio was just a [here] (ph) under one. That ratio will likely still be significantly below our covenant limits at the end of Q2, even after the acquisition. As is all detailed in the 10-Q, we are about to file later today, post quarter end, we took on an additional $19.4 million in debt to consummate the MTEX acquisition. To do this, we increased our credit capacity by amending our credit facility with Bank of America. Post-acquisition, we still have sufficient committed revolving credit capacity to support our operating needs. And together with the banking relationship, we believe also support non-organic growth opportunities that fit our acquisition criteria, should the opportunities arise. That said, our primary focus in the near-term is debt reduction. We expect -- I guess I should say, we have the goal of repaying most of the revolving credit debt or we're paying all of the revolving credit debt by the end of the year. I should note that the availability under the bank revolving credit does decline by $5 million from $30 million to $25 million at the end of the fiscal year, but we really don't expect to need it. So with that, I'll turn the call back to Greg for closing comments.