Thanks, Mike, and good morning, everyone. The end of treatment data we reported at the EASL congress in June, with from our ongoing Phase 2a combination clinical trials, evaluating and imdusiran with two immunomodulatory approaches and supports advancing the development of imdusiran as the cornerstone therapeutics of an HBV functional cure regimen that reduces surface antigen suppresses HBV DNA and boost the immune system. The first trial improved one, evaluated the safety, tolerability and antiviral activity of a 24 week lead-in of imdusiran 60 milligrams given every eight weeks, followed by 12 or 24 weeks of weekly interferon with or without additional doses of imdusiran and nuke suppressed chronic hepatitis B patients. At the end of interferon treatments, patients remained on their Nuc therapy for an additional 24 weeks. And at that point, if protocol criteria were met, they could stop their Nuc therapy and remain off all therapy for 48 weeks of follow-up. While we presented the full undertreatment preliminary dataset for all four patient cohorts at EASL, I will focus on the two cohorts of patients in the trial that received 24 weeks of interferon as more patients in these cohorts reached and maintained undetectable surface antigen levels than in the 12-week interferon cohorts. 12 patients received 24 weeks of imdusiran dosing, followed by 24 weeks of weekly interferon with continued imdusiran dosing every eight weeks. And for those 12 patients or 33% had undetectable surface antigen at the end of treatment, all four patients maintained undetectable surface antigen after stopping interferon treatment and continuing just their Nuc therapy for 24 weeks. These same four patients discontinued their Nuc therapy and are in follow-up. And if they continue to maintain undetectable surface antigen and HBV DNA levels for another 24 weeks, they will be considered functionally cured. Of note, there are also two patients that received 24 weeks of imdusiran followed by 24 weeks of interferon with no additional doses of imdusiran, that also reached and maintained undetectable surface antigen and have discontinued Nuc therapy. So in total, there are six patients from the 24-week interferon cohort that achieved sustained surface antigen loss of zero converted with high surface antibody levels and are now being followed off all therapy to assess for a functional cure. The 33% response rate seen with 24 weeks of interferon, is one of the highest response rate seen in the field, including some studies testing interferon treatment durations of 48 weeks. In addition, unlike other RNAi candidates in development that have been evaluated in combination with interferon, imdusiran was administered less frequently and at a lower dose. The key opinion leaders in the HBV field have found these data to be impressive. There's been prior skepticism around the use of interferon and HBV functional cure regimen, especially since 48 weeks of interferon treatment is not always well tolerated. This clinical trial evaluated 24 weeks of interferon treatment, which is one of the shortest courses leading to sustained surface antigen loss in patients with HBV to date. Additionally, in this clinical trial, interferon was generally safe and well-tolerated, giving us and others in the field. The belief that this may be a viable treatment regimen to advance into a Phase 2b clinical trial. Our second trial improved to, is evaluating the safety and immunogenicity of a 24 week lead-in with imdusiran, followed by biotherapeutics, immunotherapeutic VTP-300, while continuing Nuc therapy. At the end of treatment week 48, if patients met protocol criteria that could stop their Nuc therapy and continue to be followed for 48 weeks of all treatment. During the 24 week imdusiran lead-in period, we saw a 1.8 logs decline in surface antigen from baseline on average. This decline in surface antigen with imdusiran treatment alone is in-line with data we've seen to date from our other clinical trials. In addition 95% of patients had surface antigen levels less than 100 IUs per ml at the time of dosing with VTP-300 or placebo. And after VTP-300 administration, more patients maintained surface antigen threshold of less than 100 or less than 10 IUs per ml versus placebo through 24 weeks post end of treatment. Statistical significance was achieved in mean surface antigen levels between the treatment arm of five patients, and placebo with six patients, reaching the 24-week post end of treatment timepoint. The data from this trial supports our thesis that by first lowering surface antigen with imdusiran, we increase the patient's ability to respond to additional treatments. Recall, that we've expanded the improved use clinical trial to evaluate the addition of a low dose of anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody nivolumab to the imdusiran and VTP-300 combination treatment regimen. We believe nivolumab may further boost the host immune response. We are on track to report preliminary data from this portion of the trial later this year. Now, let's briefly review the Phase 1a/1b clinical trial with AB-101. As Mike mentioned, AB-101, our liver centric oral small molecule, PDL1 checkpoint inhibitor, is differentiated from checkpoint inhibitor antibodies that is developed for potential use in combination with imdusiran as a potential treatment regimen to functionally cure chronic hepatitis B. The Phase 1a/ 1b clinical trial consists of three parts, starting with single and then multiple ascending doses in healthy subjects and culminating with multiple doses in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Last quarter, we reported data from Part one showing that AB-101 is generally well tolerated with evidence of dose-dependent receptor occupancy. In the 25 milligram cohort, all five evaluable subjects showed evidence of PDL1 receptor occupancy between 50% and 100%. Indicating that AB-101 is interacting with the intended target. We are now in part two of this trial, where cohorts of healthy subjects are receiving multiple ascending doses of AB-101. We anticipate announcing preliminary data from Part two later this year. Our goal is to move as quickly as possible into Part three, which will enroll patients with chronic hepatitis B. We believe that the immune checkpoint pathway plays an important role in HBV specific immune tolerance and in T-cell activation. And the addition of a checkpoint inhibitor in combination with imdusiran could potentially further enhance HBV specific immune responses. With that, I'll turn the call over to Dave Hastings, for a brief financial update. Dave?