UUUU - AMEX

Good day, ladies and gentlemen, thank you all for joining us for this Energy Fuels Q1 2026 conference call. As a reminder, all phone participants are in a listen-only mode to prevent any background noise, but later you will have the opportunity to ask questions. As a reminder, today's session is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to turn the floor over to President and CEO, Mr. Ross Bhappu. Welcome, sir.

Thank you, Jim. I appreciate the intro. Thank you everybody for participating today. Look, I want to start by thanking Mark Chalmers. Mark recently retired from Energy Fuels after almost 10 years with the firm. Mark has done just a fabulous job putting together a great group of assets, putting a great team together. As I look forward to my new tenure here as the CEO of the company, I'm just thrilled to be taking the helm and moving the company into the next generation. We have a lot of work ahead of us, and as I start kind of my tenure in the company, I'm focused on a few things. One is executing on our business strategy.

It's ensuring that we have the right team in place, and it's ensuring that we all operate safely within this organization. That is a key area of responsibility. The other thing that's a heavy focus of mine is being a good neighbor in the communities we operate, and we wanna operate at very high environmental standards and be a truly good partner wherever we go. My focus as I look forward is to position the company for long-term growth and build stability and shareholder value. I'd like to turn our attention to the next slide, which is our forward-looking notice, forward-looking statements. I will be making forward-looking statements today. These statements reflect our current expectations and assumptions and certainly involve some uncertainties.

I'd refer you to our 10-Q filing and the latest 10-K and other SEC and SEDAR filings for the risk factors. Looking at our next page, the first quarter highlights. Look, we had a fantastic first quarter by every measure. I'm excited to tell you about some of these accomplishments. First of all, from an operational perspective, we mined 425,000 pounds of uranium, and we produced nearly 800,000 pounds in our mill. We ended the quarter with two and a quarter million pounds in our inventory, and we released a very positive Vara Mada feasibility study with a $1.8 billion NPV, and that includes over $500 million per year of expected EBITDA.

When you think about that and put that into perspective, that takes Energy Fuels to a whole new level. We also completed our White Mesa Mill Phase 2 bankable feasibility study, that came in with a fantastic lower than expected capital cost at $410 million. We expect $311 million of annual EBITDA when that facility is up and running on a standalone basis. We also announced the ASM acquisition. ASM, Australian Strategic Materials, which I'm gonna talk about later, really moves us into a new league and gives us the ability to produce metals and alloys. We'll talk about that, like I said, later. Also, during the quarter, we produced our first terbium.

Terbium is one of those exotic, rare earth heavy minerals that everybody's seeking in their magnets, and it really puts us into a different league. We've gained, as a result of those announcements, substantial interest from off-takers as a result of all this news. From a financial perspective, we have a robust balance sheet of over $950 million of liquidity. We generated $8 million of EBITDA, and we had sales and revenue from both a combination of contract and spot sales in the uranium business. In addition, we are continuing to work on expanding our Phase One facilities. Recall, Phase One is our uranium processing line that we recently, a couple years ago, converted to process rare earth minerals.

We're expanding our current capabilities in Phase 1, what we're calling Phase 1B, which will allow us to produce commercial quantities of terbium and dysprosium. We're adding Phase 1C, which will allow us to process MREC material. MREC is mixed rare earth carbonates, that puts us into a different league. The fantastic aspect of that is we'll be able to process rare earth minerals and uranium simultaneously with Phase 1C. Finally, in the quarter, right at the very end of the quarter.

Ladies and gentlemen, this is the operator. Please remain connected. Ladies and gentlemen, we appreciate your patience. Please remain online. We are attempting to reestablish connection with our speakers. Ladies and gentlemen, this is the operator once again. We thank you for your patience. Please remain online as we try to reestablish connection with our presenters. Ladies and gentlemen, this is Jim, your operator, once again thanking you for your patience. Please remain online while we attempt to reconnect with our speakers. Thank you all. Ladies and gentlemen, this is your operator. I thank you for your patience. I believe we have Mr. Bhappu reconnected. Thank you all.

Thank you, Jim. Ladies and gentlemen, I apologize for that mishap. I'm not exactly sure what happened, but I hope you can hear me now. I'd like to go back and start. I don't know where we cut off, so I'm gonna start back on our first quarter highlights. By any measure, what I would say is Q1 2026 was a very good quarter for Energy Fuels, and I'm excited to tell you about it. From an operational perspective, we mined 425,000 pounds of uranium and produced nearly 800,000 pounds through the mill. At the end of the quarter, we ended with 2.25 million pounds in inventory, and we released a very positive Vara Mata feasibility study.

That study showed an NPV of $1.8 billion, and we're anticipating over $500 million per year of expected annual EBITDA. This takes Energy Fuels to a new level by any measure and is a game changer for us. We also released the White Mesa Mill Phase Two feasibility study. We were pleasantly surprised that our CapEx came in lower than anticipated at $410 million. The economics of that project are robust and provide for a $1.9 billion NPV. The IRR on that project is about a 33% rate of return.

We expect EBITDA from that project from the Phase 2 to be about $311 million. That's just on a standalone basis, not including taking into account Vara Mada feed, as well as other feed. We produced our first terbium this quarter, which again is a game changer. It's being done at a pilot plant scale. We're producing about a kilogram per week. We've gained incredible interest from all those announcements across the board. The other announcement, of course, was the announcement of the ASM acquisition, Australian Strategic Materials. ASM is a metal and alloy producer, rare earth metal and alloy producer. That's a game changer. It helps block a choke point or open a choke point that exists in our sector for rare earths.

From a financial perspective, we have a robust balance sheet. We have $950 million of liquidity. We generated $8 million of operating cash flows last quarter or in Q1. We have sales revenue from a combination of both contract and spot sales, and we like to keep a balance of both contract and spot sales, and that's worked well for us in the past. In addition, we are working on a number of exciting opportunities at least we started working on them in Q1. The first one is Phase One B. Recall that Phase One of our mill is our uranium facility that we've converted to process rare earths. Today, we can only process either uranium or rare earths. We can't do them simultaneously, we're trying to fix that.

We're adding Phase 1B, which will allow us to produce heavies, both dysprosium and terbium. We'll also be able to produce other heavy minerals like samarium, europium, gadolinium, and possibly yttrium, depending on market conditions. Phase 1C will allow us to process MREC material. MREC is a product coming from ionic clays, and that will allow us to process both uranium ores as well as rare earth ores simultaneously, which we can't do today. I'd like to just highlight that at the end of the quarter, we published our sustainability report. It's a fabulous demonstration of what we're doing in the sustainability area, and I'd encourage you to take the time to have a look at that report.

It's on our website. For those of you that are new to Energy Fuels, new investors, I'd like to take you through a little bit of background on our capabilities. Energy Fuels started its life as a uranium company. We've been in the uranium business for over 45 years in various forms, and we built that uranium capability through mining and processing at our White Mesa Mill. Given that expertise, we took that on and we carried that over to rare earth minerals. Recall that all rare earth elements, all rare earth minerals contain some level of either uranium or thorium. They're all radioactive to some extent. Our knowledge and expertise in the uranium business has allowed us to be a leader in the processing of those rare earth minerals. The mineral of choice for us is monazite.

Monazite is a byproduct from heavy mineral sands. That's allowed us to get into the heavy mineral sands business, and we've put our foot on and own 3 heavy mineral sands operations, plus another mining operation called Dubbo with the ASM acquisition. I'll talk about Monazite and why it's our mineral of choice here in a few minutes. While the 3 areas, those 3 sectors look quite disparate, they're actually quite, they flow quite well together. The thing they have in common is that they all contain radioactive components, and that's really what creates Energy Fuels the company today. When we look at a global footprint of where we are with Energy Fuels, on the far left side, the dark blue dots and highlights represent our uranium business.

In the middle of the left side, the yellow box, that's our White Mesa Mill that really brings everything together and allows us to do everything else that we're doing. Across the bottom of the page, the red boxes represent our heavy mineral sands opportunities and projects. Those will be not only producing titanium and zirconium products, but they'll also provide us the monazite that we will feed into the facility in White Mesa, our mill here in Utah. With the addition of ASM, we now have an operating metallization facility located in Korea, and we're planning to replicate that facility with an American metals plant here in the U.S. Very much a global footprint, very much a growth story, and very much of an exciting story for critical minerals here in the U.S.

Carrying this over now to our uranium highlights, recall that Energy Fuels is the largest producer of uranium. We mined 425,000 pounds from both La Sal and Pinyon Plain last year. Or sorry, this last quarter. Last year, we produced 1.7 million pounds from those two mines. The White Mesa Mill produced about 800,000 pounds in Q1, and to date, we're about 1.2 million pounds of uranium from the White Mesa Mill. We continue to build a strategic base of uranium, we sell opportunistically into the spot market. Of course, we also have a long-term set of long-term contracts that we're feeding into. The U.S. is heavily reliant on imports of uranium, we're trying to help solve that problem.

It still amazes me that we're taking uranium ore from or uranium material from Russia. I know that's gonna end soon, we'd like to be a part of solving that. When we look at the market trend for uranium, you can't help but be excited about what's happening in the nuclear energy space and the need for more uranium. We'll continue to offer uranium on both a balance of contract and spot sales. The older contracts are set to expire over the next few years. Recall those are lower-priced contracts, those allowed us to get into business a few years ago or restart our uranium operations a few years ago. The new contracts will continue to have price floors and ceilings.

We're excited about the opportunities there. When we go to the next page, the White Mesa Mill in Blanding, Utah, the White Mesa Mill really makes everything possible for us at Energy Fuels. It's truly a national treasure by any means, by any measure. It's 45 years old, but it's using state-of-the-art technology and equipment for processing not only uranium, but rare earth minerals. We're often asked what it would take to replicate that facility, and it's hard to put a price tag on it because it's not easily replicable, mainly due to challenges with permitting, but the time constraints to replicate that facility would be very, very extensive.

The dual commodity processing of both rare earth and uranium, I think, is unmatched in the Western world, and the history of uranium processing really provides us with an incredible track record for processing not only uranium, but the rare earth feedstock. We are the only facility in the U.S. that can commercially process monazite at that mill. When we look at our rare earth highlights, we are building a truly, fully integrated mine to alloy supplier of critical minerals. We plan through the acquisition of ASM to capture value across the supply chain, and we're not beholden to any other part of the chain by having this self-reliance of the vertical integration. We have a fabulous team at the White Mesa Mill, and we're actively producing heavy minerals at the pilot plant that we've been sending out for validation.

As mentioned previously, we are preparing to expand phase 1B, which will allow us to process terbium and dysprosium. Phase 1C will allow us to produce and process MREC. MREC, as I mentioned before, it comes from ionic clays, it's a valuable source of rare earth minerals that we're gonna be excited to be able to produce both uranium and rare earths simultaneously. We have phase 2. In phase 2, we hope to have those permits by the end of next year. When fully commissioned, we'll be able to process and produce over 6,000 tons per year of NdPr. We will truly be a substantial supplier of rare earths. The question we often get is why monazite?

What we like about monazite is it offers a number of benefits. First of all, it's a very high-grade source of rare earth minerals. It typically contains 50%-60% total rare earth minerals contained, but it's high in neodymium and praseodymium, and equally it's high in dysprosium and terbium. Those are very attractive. In addition, it also contains uranium, which we recover and sell as a byproduct then of the rare earth processing. Monazite has a lot of benefits. The other benefit is, as a byproduct of heavy mineral sands, the production cost can be shared across a number of different commodities. Again, the White Mesa Mill is the only facility in the U.S. that can process that commercially. We did the acquisition.

We announced the acquisition on January 20th of Australian Strategic Materials, ASM. ASM really provides a unique opportunity for Energy Fuels. Outside of China, there are very few rare earth metallization factories. ASM has a commercial operating facility in Korea. The vertical integration that this allows from mine to alloys provides a tremendous competitive advantage, including expanded margins, greater market share, and it's resulted in a very positive comments and views from our offtakers. The acquisition is progressing very well. We recently obtained our FIRB approval. FIRB is the Foreign Investment Review Board, equivalent to CFIUS here in the U.S. That approval was an important part of that process. We're targeting closing that transaction in early July, and again, it's progressing quite well.

On the heavy mineral sands side of the business, heavy mineral sands, again, is a really important product. It allows us to obtain the monazite as a byproduct. Heavy mineral sands contain titanium zirconium minerals. Those are used across a wide range of industrial applications, including pigments, metals, ceramics, chemicals, refractories, foundries, and nuclear applications. Energy Fuels has three heavy mineral sands projects, and with the ASM acquisition, we'll hold an important polymetallic operation as well. The Vara Mada project is our project in Madagascar. We're advancing that. We're working towards obtaining a government stability agreement, also called an investment agreement. That work has been underway for some time, but with the change in government recently, we've had a little bit of a delay getting that investment agreement signed.

We continue to have very good engagement with the government of Madagascar, and we're looking forward to progressing that as we go through the balance of this year. The Donald Project is a project in Australia where we're earning a 49% joint venture ownership. Donald is shovel-ready. It's a project that has obtained all of its permits. We are looking to make a final investment decision here in the next few months. I think the one thing that's holding us back is we're finalizing our financing and offtake agreements. We're making very good progress and hope to be able to announce that FID fairly soon. The Bahia project is a 100% owned project in the state of Bahia in Brazil.

We're conducting drilling there. We will hope to have a scoping study or a PFS done later this year. Finally, we have the Dubbo Project, which comes from the ASM acquisition. Dubbo is not a heavy mineral sands project. It's a polymetallic project, but it's got very high, critical minerals grades in it, and we hope to have that provide further feedstock to the White Mesa Mill in the future. The next slide is an interesting slide because it shows just how global we are, especially in delivering the rare earth minerals to the White Mesa Mill. Again, we have our 3 heavy mineral sands projects that will supply monazite, one in Australia, one in Brazil, and one in Africa, in Madagascar. Those supply the monazite feedstock to the White Mesa Mill.

White Mesa Mill will then process those rare earth minerals, produce oxides. The oxides will then go to either Korea or once we build our facility in the U.S. for metallization, it'll go there and be processed in the U.S. From there, it gets sold to magnet manufacturers and to the end producers. We truly are a global company and excited about our opportunities there. With that, I'd like to hand this off to Nathan Bennett. Nathan Bennett is our CFO, and he's gonna talk a little bit about the financials for the quarter.

Yes. Thank you, Ross, and good morning, everyone. As we look at the financial updates for Q1 2026. If you can go to the next one. We continue to maintain a strong financial position as we prepare to develop our long-term projects. We finished with $957 million in working capital and $1.4 billion in total assets. This working capital continues to reflect the $621 million in net proceeds received from our convertible note offering that we completed last year in the fourth quarter that we have yet to draw down on.

The working capital also includes 2.2 million pounds of uranium, which of about half is in finished inventories and the other half is in process or in ore piles. This liquidity gives us the financial flexibility to advance our strategic projects and be opportunistic as the market evolves and deliver on our guidance. Looking at the P&L, we continue to see improvement in our net loss, with a net loss of $11 million in Q1 2026. This compares to a net loss of $26 million in the prior year, Q1 2025, and a net loss of $21 million in last quarter, Q4 2025. This improvement is due to the increase in our uranium revenue and sales, and also an increase in income from our marketable securities from invested cash.

This is partially offset by higher operating costs and transaction costs, as you see in the P&L, as we progress our global strategy. Now noting our guidance, we do anticipate uranium sales to continue throughout the year to help offset our burn rate as we progress our projects and our strategy. Looking at our segment footnote in footnote 19 of the 10-Q, we did note that our uranium segment has shown promising results as we begin to be profitable, and we expect this trend towards profitability to continue in our uranium segment. As we look at our revenue and our sales, we took advantage of spot price increases during the quarter, and we sold 100,000 pounds at an average price of $95.88.

Looking at our long-term utility contracts, as forecasted, we sold 410,000 pounds at just under $64 a pound. We expected these sales at this price as it relates to some of our initial long-term agreements entered into back in 2022 and 2023. We entered into these agreements when uranium prices were beginning to increase, these contracts really supported the decision to go forward with mining on Pinyon Plain in our La Sal Complex. Looking at our uranium production and moving forward throughout the year, for Pinyon Plain, we mined 375,000 pounds with an average grade of 1.12%, which was from a lower ore grade area as our mining moves between high-grade zones.

These ore grade fluctuations are expected as we mine different segments of the ore deposit, and we expect these ore grades to increase throughout 2026. This is anticipated, these ore grade fluctuations, and were contemplated in our mining production guidance. Looking at the mill, in accordance with our guidance, we continued processing Pinyon Plain and La Sal ore through Q1. We processed over 800,000 pounds as Ross has noted through March, and we reached the 1 million pound milestone for the year during April. These are really exciting results as the last two quarters have really shown the mill's capabilities, which have been above expectations, having not run at these levels in many years.

Our all-in costs for mining, transportation, and processing continue to be within our expected range of $23-$30 per pound. We expect this to continue throughout the rest of the year. We also expect processing at the mill to continue throughout 2026. We do note that we will pause processing for planned maintenance downtime scheduled at the end of Q2 and the beginning of Q3. We do note as the mill processes ore at a faster rate than we can mine, the downtime will really allow the mine production to catch up with the mill processing and replenish our ore piles at the mill. We do expect our mill processing to continue to be within our guidance of 1.5 million-2.5 million pounds for the year.

Now looking at our inventory and our cost, we continue to see a decline in our inventory costs as we produce low-cost Pinyon Plain pounds, decreasing to $36 a pound at the end of the quarter. This decrease is expected and we expect to continue to see this decrease as we mine throughout the rest of the year at Pinyon Plain. We note our cost of goods sold, we expect it to decrease to closer to $30 per pound throughout 2026 as we sell through our inventory and add low-cost Pinyon Plain production. This will really help improve our gross margins and our profitability in our uranium segment.

Looking at our inventory, we finished with 1.1 million pounds at $36 a pound, with another 1.1 million pounds in process and ready to be processed. This really gives us the sufficient inventory to meet our processing and sales guidance and to meet our long-term utility contract commitments for the remainder of 2026 and the first part of 2027. Just giving an update on the guidance, as noted in our previous slides, we do continue to anticipate to be within our guidance ranges. You know, starting with mining, we mined 425,000 pounds between our Pinyon Plain and La Sal Complex. We'll continue to mine during the downtime at the mill, that's planned to replenish the ore piles at the mill.

We expect our ore grades and pounds at Pinyon to increase as we move into higher grade zones. Looking at the processing at the mill, like I noted before, we hit our processing milestone of over 1 million pounds during April, and we're starting to near the bottom end of the range by the end of Q2. We expect to be within the range anticipated, even with the planned maintenance downtime. Now looking at the sales guidance, we sold 510,000 pounds during Q1. We expect sales to continue and to be in line with our guidance with both sales under our long-term contracts and spot sales, depending on the market conditions. With that, I'll turn it back over to Ross for some final thoughts on our 2026 activities.

Thank you, Nate. Well, look, I'd just like to finish our presentation by talking about some of our objectives for the balance of 2026. For me, it's all about execution. We have an incredible asset base, incredible mines to develop, incredible facility at White Mesa, but now it's all about execution. What we're gonna be focused on is our phase 2 permitting. We're gonna focus on phase 1B and 1C, get that construction going and finalized. Hope to be operational on phase 1B and 1C late in 2027. We hope to make our Donald FID very soon. We're very heavily focused on that.

We're gonna continue to advance our Vara Mada project, both on the engineering side, also on the investment agreement, government relations side. We have a big social outreach program, big focus on the communities there that will continue. We're gonna continue advancing our drilling and our engineering work at the Bahia project. Finally, I would say that a big focus of mine is for our company to operate safely and in a sustainable way. Again, I'd encourage you to have a look at our sustainability report that we just released. I think you'll find it very impressive. Look, I'm really proud of what this team has accomplished in the first quarter.

I'm excited to be taking the helm of the company and moving it forward through the rest of 2026 and beyond, and very excited for what we have going forward. With that, I'd like to end our formal presentation, and I think we're gonna open it. I'll turn it back over to Jim for questions and answers.

Certainly. Thank you. To our audience joining today over the phones, at this time, if you would like to ask a question, simply press star and 1 on your telephone keypad. Pressing star and 1 will place your line into a queue, and I will open your lines 1 at a time. Once again, ladies and gentlemen, that is star and 1, if you would like to ask a question. We'll hear first from Anthony Talieri at Canaccord Genuity.

Well, thanks, and good morning. Maybe just starting with the uranium side of things, just curious, how much finished inventory are you guys interested in maintaining? You know, obviously, we saw you guys sell 100,000 pounds in Q1 on the spot market, you know, close to $100 a pound. Should we expect you guys to sell up to the high end of the sales guidance range if prices came back to around those levels?

Yeah. Look, Anthony, I think You know, first of all, we have to maintain sufficient inventory to meet our contractual obligations. First and foremost, I'd say, you know, that's a driver. The other way I would answer this is that we want to maintain some optionality where we can switch the mill over from processing uranium to processing rare earths depending on market conditions. It's a bit of a balance, and when you look at our guidance, you know, we have pretty high ranges of uranium sales, and it's largely because of that, because we want to maintain enough inventory to feed our contractual obligations. We want to have some going into the spot market, but we also want optionality and flexibility to transfer the mill operations from uranium to rare earths at any point in time.

You know, it's a great point, but we'll continue to process uranium as heavily as we can. When we see prices going over $100 like they did earlier this year, we'll certainly take advantage of that. Again, longer term, we do see uranium prices escalating. Again, we wanna maintain some optionality around that. It's a bit of a balance, and I'd say it's a bit of an art. That's pretty much why we're going the direction we are.

Great. Thanks. Maybe just as a follow-up to that, in the first quarter, you sold about half of your long-term sales commitments for the year, it seems. Should we expect the sort of remaining portion of that to come in the second quarter, or will it be staged differently throughout the year?

Look, I think it'll be staged throughout the year. Again, you know, we have big contractual obligations in the first quarter, we'll be meeting those contractual obligations through the balance of the year. You know, there were some pretty big sales that came as a result of our contract, one of our big contracts. Yeah, I anticipate we'll smooth that out through the balance of the year, the balance of those sales.

Great. Thank you. I'll pass it on.

Thanks.

Our next question will come from Sundaria Iyer at B. Riley Securities.

Thank you. Thank you, team, and congratulations on the quarter. My first question is on the, is basically, like, rare earth companies as a standalone are trading meaningfully at higher multiples rather than diversified miners. Do you guys think about, you know, as this rare earth business scales when Donald, ASM, Vara Mada, all this comes together about spinning the rare earth business out and operating it as two distinct business like rare earth and uranium?

It's an interesting issue, right? Because rare earth companies do trade at high multiples. Uranium companies trade at a bit lower multiples, and then heavy mineral sands companies trade at even lower multiples. Our view is that we wanna be integrated across those three sectors. It's vitally important from a technical perspective, and from a commercial perspective that we control our own feedstocks. When I think about it, Sundaria, I think, you know, remaining and being in the business, if we're gonna be a monazite processing company, if we're gonna be an MREC processing company, I think we wanna control our own molecules.

You know, spinning out the heavy mineral sand side of the business, I think is, you know, something we might consider in the future, but right now it's so important as a source of feedstock for us, and we wanna be in control of it. I think, you know, I'll leave it to you and other analysts to figure out how to value us. At the end of the day, I think that in the bulk of our revenue, as I look at it going forward, will come from rare earths. We will have continuing revenue from uranium, and we will be ramping up revenue from heavy mineral sands.

How you weight those across to come up with our valuation, I think we'll just have to sort of live with. I would be hesitant to wanna give up control over the feedstock going into our mill.

That's very clear, Ross. Just as on another line, how are you reading the uranium market right now? I mean, prices have been really strong and holding up above the $80 a pound threshold. Are you seeing any utility customers signaling, like, urgency or to lock in domestic supply? Or is the contracting still moving slowly?

Yeah, it's an interesting question. I think, you know, you certainly see all the headlines of different companies in the SMR business, for example, that, you know, some amazing future projections for selling SMRs. And the only way they're gonna feed those SMRs is with uranium, right? But we haven't seen the utilities ramping up their buying schedules yet. I'm fully expecting that we will see that. I'm confident that we're gonna see much more focus on ensuring that they have supplies of uranium going forward. I, you know, to the best of my knowledge, we haven't really seen a huge increase in demand or discussions from the utilities to date. Look, I fully expect that's gonna change.

When you look at the projected demand, every, you know, every research group out there that studies uranium and the nuclear industry shows that the supply and demand balance is gonna start coming out of whack in the next few years, and you're just gonna need more uranium. Look, I remain very, very bullish on uranium personally. We talk about it internally here quite a lot.

Got it. Thanks for all that color. I'll turn it back.

Thanks, Sundaria.

Our next question will come from Brian Lee at Goldman Sachs.

Hey, guys. How's it going? Thanks for taking the questions. Maybe wanted to dig into the comments around Vara Mada, a little bit of a delay there. Can you elaborate a bit as to, you know, how much of a delay, what sort of needs to happen for you to maybe get that back on track? Any kind of, you know, milestones or triggers moving through the year that you could point to that might improve the visibility there? Just trying to gauge where you are in that process.

Let me just start by saying that, you know, the change in government that happened in September, October of last year really slowed the process down. You know, we were very close to signing an investment agreement around that time. With the change in government, that sort of slowed things down. We have been spending considerable time in country in Madagascar, and I'm joined here with Nathan Longenecker, who's our general counsel and who's been personally spending a lot of time in Madagascar. Let me let him answer that as well.

Yeah. We continue to try to push it forward. What we have is, you know, a government that, you know, is relatively new. We have been meeting fairly regularly with the highest levels of the government. Our discussions with them have been met with a fair bit of support from the highest levels. The government has been supportive of the project, but there are a number of things that we need to get into place. There's, you know, The document itself has a lot of aspects to it and takes a little bit of time to get that put into place. That's, that's generally where we are working with the government.

Okay. Yeah, fair enough. We'll continue to track the progress. I guess related to that, just any updated thoughts around sourcing monazite in the open market as you're waiting for some of these, you know, upstream assets to move to, you know, final investment decisions and also move to production? Seems like, you know, monazite pricing has come down a decent amount here recently, but any thoughts around maybe using that as more of a bridge to getting your assets online?

Yeah, Brian, absolutely. You know, we're gonna need to source monazite. We have three sources internally of monazite. We also have an agreement with Chemours to source monazite from them. Look, to keep phase 2, the expansion at White Mesa full, we are gonna need additional sources. A small amount, we will need some additional sources. We've got a very active business development and partnership group out there searching and in discussions with a whole host of different suppliers of monazite. I think those groups that are in production today, they're selling their monazite almost exclusively into China, and those Western companies that are doing that are looking for alternative outlets to sell their monazite.

We have a lot of discussions going on with a lot of different groups, and we will have additional sources of monazite to feed our mill.

Okay. Makes sense. I'll pass it on. Thanks, guys.

Thanks, Brian. Take care.

Next, we'll hear from Justin Chan at SCP Resource Finance.

Hi, Ross and team. Thanks for hosting the call. My first one was just on the uranium processing side. I know there's some you know, you could run a longer processing campaign or shift it over to rare earths or et cetera. There's some choices there. I was just wondering, what's your current thinking in terms of how long you intend to process uranium for?

Yeah. Look, I think first of all, the mill operates at a higher rate than our mines produce ore. The mill will always outrun the mines, at least for now. We're at a point where we're gonna be able to process ore for probably another 4 to 6 weeks. We're gonna shut down for maintenance and do some modifications to the mill. That'll allow us to build some of our uranium stockpiles up. We'll have to make a choice as to whether we restart with uranium or whether we restart with rare earths. A lot of that depends on market conditions. We're, you know, as you can see, we're, you know, we're over 1 million pounds that we've processed so far this year.

And we'll just have to make a decision as to whether we, you know, we feel comfortable with stockpiled uranium or whether we wanna continue producing versus producing rare earths. Look, I fully anticipate that, you know, that we'll get through the next, call it month, 1 and a half. We'll shut down for probably 2 months for maintenance and then make a decision on whether we're gonna start back up with rare earths or with uranium, depending on market conditions.

Gotcha. I mean, I guess if nothing changes from now, I guess, how would that influence your thinking? Like, what direction would you be leading based on current conditions?

Yeah, if nothing changes, we would probably start back up with the uranium processing and continue our uranium processing through the balance of the year.

Okay. Gotcha. Thanks. That's very clear.

Um, and what-

And then my second-

Oh, go ahead. Go ahead, Justin.

Oh, sorry. Go ahead. Please, please finish that statement. Sorry to interrupt.

Well, look, I was just gonna say Phase 1C will really give us optionality to process rare earth minerals alongside uranium. Phase 1C is gonna be geared towards processing MREC materials, but once we get that up and running, hopefully next year, that will allow us to not have to decide between processing rare earths or processing uranium, and we can do both simultaneously, albeit from MREC material. That, that's why we're very heavily focused through the balance of this year on being able to process MREC next year.

Gotcha. That makes sense. I guess, yeah, maybe let's dig into that, if you wouldn't mind, hearing me on that. I guess you'll have your own separation lines, and you won't need to use the same, tanks and everything for 1C. I guess, like, to get the MREC, would you be receiving it from third parties, or could you I guess you could presumably make your own MREC stockpiles at some point. Is that the thinking?

We have to-

Is it mainly just sourced from ionic adsorption clays?

Yeah. It would be primarily sourced from ionic clays. Early on, when we did run the mill, we did produce an MREC material at our own facility from monazite, but we don't anticipate doing that going forward. We will likely source from third parties, and there's a number of third parties out there looking for a home for their MREC. We think we could help fill that void.

Gotcha. If I could ask on, I guess, the longer term. When you do have your own dedicated rare earth processing lines and you're processing monazite, would you still retain the capacity to receive additional MREC from ionic clays?

Yeah, absolutely.

Does that create a blending issue?

No. No, no. The separate facility that we're building, this 1C, will allow us to continue to process MREC in addition to processing monazite through Phase 2. We will always maintain that capability to process MREC along with monazite.

Okay. Thanks, Ross. Maybe just one last one as a follow-up to that. I know it's a bit of a leading question, but with that capacity, does that change your strategic thinking at all in terms of having your own potential upstream ionic clay feed? I mean, you don't currently in the portfolio. I'm just thinking here that could maybe change your, what your upstream asset base might look like in the long run.

Look, the way I would answer that is I would say we're always gonna be opportunistic, and if there's an opportunity to acquire, an ionic clay, an MREC producer, we would certainly consider that, if it made sense.

Excellent. Well, thanks, Ross. I appreciate the candor and, yeah, I'll free up the line. Thank you very much.

Thanks, Justin. I appreciate the questions.

Next, we'll hear from Noel Parks at Tuohy Brothers.

Hi, good morning. I just wanted to touch back on Donald and I just wonder if you could give a sense as what remains on sort of finalizing the offtake agreement out there, which in turn, you know, will help get to the FID.

Yeah, good to talk to you, Noel, and thanks for the question. A couple of things. You know, the Donald project's going to produce a heavy mineral sand, a heavy mineral concentrate as well as monazite. Two separate offtake agreements that we need to finalize. One is on the heavy mineral concentrate, and then the second one is on the various, you know, it's not just one rare earth mineral, it's going to be four, maybe more, minerals that we get out of it. Coordinating offtake agreements across all those different commodities is time-consuming. Unfortunately, it's taken longer than we had anticipated. Once you get those offtake agreements locked in, then that impacts your financing.

They go hand in hand, and we're having discussions with various financing parties as well as offtake parties, and they're very different. You know, they're different groups, and you gotta coordinate between them. It's created a challenge. That's also compounded on the fact that we have a joint venture partner. You know, we're partners with Astron, and we need to make sure that the financing agreements that we enter into, the offtake agreements that we enter into also are agreeable and meet with the needs of our JV partner. What from the outside looks like it should be a fairly easy process to go through, it's actually quite complex and quite time-consuming, and unfortunately, it's delayed us being able to make that FID more quickly.

Look, I would say we're very heavily focused. We wanna get the FID as quickly as we possibly can. We want that mine to get up and running as quickly as we possibly can, so it's at the top of our mind every day.

Great. Thanks. That, that does fill in some gaps for me, so thanks a lot. You know, in the past, we've talked a bit about just how on the rare earths the, what the market wants has been sort of changing and evolving, well, I guess over the past year or so, and that that's informed to some degree your decisions about just, you know, which of the products you're pursuing and, you know, in what order at the mill. I wonder if you could just maybe update us a bit on maybe how you see demand shifting for the particular elements, you know, going forward.

Look, I think what you're hearing in the market about demand shifting has more to do with what people are producing.

Right

What we're saying is there continues to be very heavy demand for dysprosium and terbium. Now, the fact is not everybody can produce dysprosium and terbium. I think magnet manufacturers are trying to design magnets that reduce the reliance on dysprosium and terbium, but by no means have they solved that puzzle yet. There remains big demand for Dy and Tb in these magnets, and I think that's gonna continue for the foreseeable future. You know, when I look at what we're doing at the mill, I think, you know, we wanna be able to produce the whole suite of heavies and that's not just dysprosium and terbium. It includes samarium, gadolinium, europium, yttrium, because there is demand out there for those minerals.

You know, you take yttrium, for example, the demand and the requests we're getting out of the aerospace industry is off the charts. So look, I think we're gonna continue to see very heavy demand for the heavies, but I also think you're gonna continue to see groups trying to design the heavies out of the system. Just to add to that, the thing that the heavies add is the ability for these electric motors to operate at very high temperatures, and they haven't been able to figure out how to do that without the heavy minerals, the heavy rare earth minerals in there.

Look, I think there's some wishful thinking in there, and perhaps that'll happen at some point in the future, but up till now, You know, we're seeing a lot of requests from potential offtakers on the Dy and Tb side of the equation.

Great. Thanks a lot.

Yep. You're welcome.

Next, we'll hear from Matthew Key at Texas Capital.

Good morning, and thanks for taking my questions. I was wondering what market indications would you need to see to move ahead with some of those medium-term uranium projects? As you mentioned previously, mined ore is kind of the main bottleneck in the uranium segment. Would it be economic at current uranium spot pricing to bring a couple of those online?

Your question's really timely 'cause we just had a meeting on this yesterday, talking about our pipeline of projects and prioritizing those projects. Look, you know, I think current prices, you know, you start to consider bringing some of those online. And I guess one of the questions you always have is where is this pricing gonna go? You know, if we see prices well over $100 a pound, which we anticipate we will at some point, that brings a lot of the pipeline into, you know, a real opportunity. At these prices, you know, we're pretty happy with what we have operating. We have La Sal and Pinyon Plain operating. We have Nichols Ranch on standby.

You know, I think our view is we ought to You know, we will continue to permit the development projects. We'll continue to advance those projects and be ready to put them into production as soon as we feel like there's a long-term sustainable price above a certain threshold. That threshold varies by project. We do have this pipeline and we will look to bring them online as prices permit. Look, it's something that's very topical, and I'm sorry I can't give you like a hard number that's, you know, over X dollars will bring this project in into production. We are thinking about that every day.

Got it. No, that's helpful. Just kind of on the back of that, I'm wondering if you would ever consider selling Nichols Ranch. As an ISR project it's obviously a lot different than the conventional portfolio. Like, do you see that as a potential area where you could, you know, generate some incremental liquidity down the line? Is the plan there to eventually develop that?

You're talking about Nichols Ranch?

Yeah.

Just to be clear? Yeah.

Yeah.

Look, if you're making an offer to buy it, we'll certainly think about that. You know, look, we're pretty excited by Nichols Ranch. We love having the fact that it's ready, it's on standby, it's ready to be put into production. We could get it up and running probably in four to six months if we pull the trigger on it. We like having that optionality. That doesn't mean if we didn't get a great offer for it we wouldn't consider that. We like the optionality we have with it today.

Got it now. That's helpful. Just one more quick one from me. While I understand the ASM transaction hasn't closed yet, I did wanna ask a quick question on the Dubbo project and what the plan would be for that asset, you know, if the acquisition closed, which is kind of my assumption. Could that be used as feedstock for White Mesa or would it, you know, have to operate more as a standalone project for you guys?

Yeah, you know, that's a really a great question because it's not a heavy mineral sands project, it's a polymetallic project with high critical minerals credits like niobium, but also the rare earth minerals. The current plan from ASM is to use that to do a heap leach on that project and to do sort of semi-processing to produce a rare earth hydroxide that would then come to the White Mesa mill for treatment at White Mesa. That was driven to a large extent by capital cost considerations of ASM versus building a mill and producing more of a concentrate. We wanna go back.

After we close on the transaction, we wanna go back and look at those engineering studies, make sure we agree with the path that ASM was going down or maybe not, and then evaluate what is the best alternative for getting value out of Dubbo. Cause it does have, like I said, it has a whole host of other minerals in it, again, like niobium, that would be a really interesting product to or mineral to produce. We just have to evaluate it and see what makes the most sense. Right now they're planning to produce a hydroxide that we would then bring to White Mesa and we could process in the White Mesa mill, much like an MREC material.

Got it. That's super helpful. Appreciate the time and best of luck moving forward.

Well, thank you, Matthew. Good talking to you.

We have no further questions from our audience this morning. Mr. Bhappu, I'm happy to turn the floor back over to you for any initial or closing remarks you have.

Well, look, I would just say thank you to everybody for participating. This is my first earnings call as the new CEO, and I'm excited to be in this role and excited to take the company forward. I just ask you to keep a watch on our company 'cause we've got a lot of exciting things happening. Thank you.