Thanks, Jim. Production for the first quarter average just about 17,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day comprised of about 60% oil. We continue to be impacted by sour gas, handling and takeaway constraints and volume withdrawal during the quarter. These constraints include multiple days when we were curtailed on our ability to flow sour gas to third-party sales line in addition to more than a week of complete downtime at one of our primary third-party sour gas outlets. As we are unable to pay our sour gas, these curtailments and outages resulted in shut in oil and gas production for many days during the first quarter. We expect fewer issues in relation to third-party sour gas outlets going forward now that our Halcon owned H2S treating plant is operational. In fact, after putting our treating plant into operation, we're able to perform well in online and Monument Draw here in the last month resulting in current net production in excess of 20,000 Boe a day. John will provide more color on our new treating plant and other operational developments in a moment. Our first quarter realized oil differential of 90% NYMEX has improved from the 83% differential seen in the fourth quarter given improved midland pricing during the quarter. Our first quarter natural gas differential came in at 25% of NYMEX, which was driven by weak Waha pricing in the quarter. Our NGL differential for the first quarter was 31%. Our adjusted operating expenses, including LOE workover and GTO, were elevated in the first quarter for multiple reasons. First, on the LOE side, our water-disposal costs across of field were higher than previous years because this was the first full quarter where we paid the $0.80 per barrel contract to disposal rate for produced water-to-water bridge under the terms of that agreement. Recurring GTO was higher versus prior quarters, primarily because of extra contract personnel working in mine withdrawals, assisting running our operations with the new infrastructure being put in place. G&A expense as adjusted totaled $9.2 million in the first quarter versus $8 million in the fourth quarter. The increase in G&A versus fourth quarter was primarily driven by a $1.6 million credit we booked in the fourth quarter related to a positive legal settlement in that quarter. After adjusting for this settlement, the first quarter adjusted G&A rate was actually a little less than it was in the fourth quarter of 2018. Similar to the fourth quarter, we had a significant amount of non-recurring expense in the first quarter primarily related to well-level chemical treating of H2S and Monument Draw. With the operation of our new treating plant, we expect these non-recurring costs to go away in the second quarter. With respect to D&C CapEx, we incurred approximately $72 million during the first quarter. We spent another $29 million in the first quarter on infrastructure, seismic and other, with the majority of this spend related to the continued buildout of our sour gas handling and treating facilities in Monument Draw. We expect both D&C CapEx and infrastructure CapEx to decline materially over the remainder of 2019. We recently completed an amendment to the borrowing base redetermination with our senior revolving credit lenders, which resulted in our borrowing base being reduced to $225 million. Although our reserve profile was adjusted by a higher borrowing base, our senior lenders are not comfortable with our current elevated leverage situation, and therefore, decided to reduce their commitment to us. We do believe that $225 million borrowing base will provide us with significant liquidity until we complete our further process we are undergoing with our advisors. We are also considering the firm completion annual dropping the rate in the near term to maximize liquidity as we go through this process. We can do this without any significant break in stock as both of our rig contracts are well to well right now. We are not yet revising our capital for production guidance for the year as we have not made a final decision to drop rigs. I would note that if we do pursue a new financing structure that provides more liquidity and flexibility than our revolver does, we should be allowed to continue with the two-rig program for the rest of the year. With that, I will turn the call over to Jon for comments.