image
Industrials - Conglomerates - NYSE - US
$ 23.8
-0.252 %
$ 1.75 B
Market Cap
27.64
P/E
EARNINGS CALL TRANSCRIPT
EARNINGS CALL TRANSCRIPT 2014 - Q4
image
Executives

Matt Steinburg - Director, The IGB Group Alan Offenberg - Chief Executive Officer, Director Elias Sabo - Partner and Manager Ryan Faulkingham - Chief Financial Officer.

Analysts

Larry Solow - CJS Securities Vernon Plack - BB&T Securities Greg Mason - KBW Bob Napoli - William Blair.

Operator

Good morning and welcome to Compass Diversified Holdings 2014 Fourth Quarter Conference Call. Today’s call is being recorded. All lines have been placed on mute. [Operator Instructions]. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Matt Steinburg of The IGB Group for introductions and the reading of the Safe Harbor statement.

Please go ahead, sir..

Matt Steinburg

Thank you and welcome to the Compass Diversified Holdings fourth quarter 2014 conference call. Representing the Company today are Alan Offenberg CEO; Ryan Faulkingham, CFO; and Elias Sabo, a founding partner of Compass Group Management.

Before we begin I’d like to point out that the Q4 press release, including the financial tables and the non-GAAP reconciliations, is available on the Company's Web site at www.compassdiversifiedholdings.com. The Company also filed its Form 10-K with the SEC last night.

Please note that throughout this call, we will refer to Compass Diversified Holdings as CODI or the Company. Now allow me to read the following Safe Harbor statement. During this conference call we may make certain forward-looking statements including statements with regard to the future performance of CODI.

Words such as belief, expect, project and future, or similar expressions, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to the inherent uncertainties in predicting future results and conditions.

Certain factors could cause actual results to differ on a material basis from those projected in these forward-looking statements, and some of these factors are enumerated in the risk factor discussion in the Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended December 31, 2014 as well as in other SEC filings.

In particular, the domestic and global economic environment has a significant impact on our subsidiary companies. CODI undertakes no obligations to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. At this time, I would like to turn the call over to Alan Offenberg..

Alan Offenberg

Good morning. Thank you all for your time and welcome to our fourth quarter 2014 earnings conference call. During the 2014 fourth quarter and full year period, we generated strong operating results as we continue to benefit from the leadership positions and financial strength of our middle market businesses.

During the time when we capitalized on expected acquisition opportunities and monetizing investment added value for our shareholders, we are pleased to have generated cash flow available for distribution and reinvestment which we refer to as cash flow or CAD of 58 million for the 2014 full year.

Complementing our considerable success enhancing the prospects of CODI's existing family of leading niche businesses, we made significant progress during the year implementing key initiatives to strengthen the company from both the strategic and financial perspective. Notably, we acquired Clean Earth and SternoCandleLamp.

Two attractive businesses with strong market position, experienced management teams, healthy and stable cash flows and solid growth potential.

In addition to acquiring these two attractive platform companies which has significantly strengthened our earnings power, we further enhanced the future prospects of Clean Earth with the add-on acquisition of American Environmental Services or AES, a provider of environmental services managing hazardous and non-hazardous waste from outside generators.

During the year, we also further strengthened our financial and liquidity position. Specifically, we refinanced our debt which lowered our borrowing cost, extended our maturities and increased our total debt capacity by approximately 120 million to 725 million.

Additionally, we completed a public offering of late approximately 100 million of net proceeds which were used to repay a portion of the outstanding balance of our revolving credit facility. In July, FOX completed a secondary share offering in which CODI participated and received total net proceed of approximately 65.5 million.

With these proceeds combined with the debt and equity proceeds from FOX's IPO in August 2013, CODI has now generated total proceeds to-date of over 200 million, while maintaining an approximate 41% ownership in FOX. As a reminder, CODI acquired a controlling interest in FOX in January 2008 for approximately 80 million.

Combined, these initiatives will substantially enhance CODI's ability to deliver superior shareholder returns over the long-term, while also increasing our financial flexibility to take advantage of market opportunities.

Turning to our results, our niche industrial businesses delivered another year of solid performance by generating predictable and strong free cash flow.

For the year ended December 31st, 2014, our niche industrial businesses including contributions from Clean Earth and SternoCandleLamp each on a pro forma basis as the companies were acquired on January 1, 2013 both the combined revenue and EBITDA increases of approximately 6% and 15% respectively compared to the 2013 full year period.

In addition, these services produced a combined EBITDA margin of 14.7% as compared to 13.7% for the year ended December 31, 2013. Turning to our branded consumer businesses, combined revenue and EBITDA decreased approximately 4% and 12% respectively for the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to the prior year.

The combined EBITDA margin for the year ended December 31, 2014 declined to approximately 18.9% compared to 20.8% for the 2013 full year period. Please note that the result of our branded consumer businesses exclude FOX which was deconsolidated from our results in the third quarter.

The results of our branded consumer businesses were negatively impacted by the well publicized industry boom-to-bust cycle in 2013 and 2014 that significantly impacted our Liberty Safe business. We believe that we have successfully navigated through these challenges by taking proactive measures to right size Liberty.

When combined with the underlying strength of our other branded consumer businesses we entered 2015 with expectations of solid earnings growth in our branded consumer businesses as compared to 2014. For the fourth quarter we paid a cash distribution of $0.36 per share, representing a current yield of approximately 8.5%.

Since going public in May of 2006 CODI has paid cumulative distributions of approximately $11.76 per share.

Although our cash flow per share in 2014 was reduced to a level below our current distribution per share following the IPO by FOX in 2013, we expect that the acquisitions of Clean Earth and SternoCandleLamp as well as growth from our other businesses to result in CODI generating cash flow that exceeds our distribution on an annualized basis going forward.

Additionally, we have realized gains of more than $340 million from opportunistic divestitures of CODI subsidiaries, which have never been included in our calculation of CAD.

Looking ahead, CODI’s solid balance sheet strength and significant liquidity position allow us to continue to aggressively pursue additional platform acquisitions as well as add on acquisitions that are accretive to cash.

That said we will remain disciplined on valuation and diligence but also we investing in our current subsidiaries to generate organic growth increased market share. Overall we are optimistic regarding our future prospects and remain committed to seeking opportunities to add long-term value for our shareholders.

I will now turn the call over to Elias to review the quarterly performance of our current group of subsidiaries. .

Elias Sabo Partner & Chief Executive Officer

Thank you, Alan. I will begin by reviewing our niche industrial businesses. Please note that the revenue and EBITDA numbers I provide for Clean Earth and SternoCandleLamp will be on a pro forma basis, as if these businesses were acquired on January 1, 2013.

We are pleased to report a combined revenue increase of 6% during the fourth quarter of 2014 as compared to the year earlier period. EBITDA on a combined basis increased by 2% as compared to the year earlier period; however the combined EBIDTA margin declined to 14.4% for the quarter ended December 31, 2014 from 15.1% in the prior year quarter.

Advanced Circuits posted results that exceeded our expectations for the fourth quarter. Revenue increased by 4% year-over-year driven primarily by continued strong performance in assembly sale. EBITDA margins were higher by approximately 110 basis points compared to the year-ago period reflecting lower SG&A cost as a percentage of revenue.

Looking at 2015 we anticipate consistent performance for ACI as compared to the 2014 results. Arnold Magnetics reported softer than expected results in the quarter.

Revenue declined 9% year-over-year reflecting the continued decline in the sales of reprographics component of the PMAG division, which was anticipated as well as the decline in sales in Europe attributable to one customer. Fourth quarter EBITDA at Arnold declined 12% year-over-year.

We anticipate growth in Arnold’s earnings in 2015 as compared to 2014. At Tridien, although fourth quarter revenue grew by nearly 17%, EBITDA was slightly lower compared to the year ago period.

Margins in the quarter were affected by higher sales of lower margin non-powered products as well as higher SG&A expenses due to ongoing increased investment in R&D and administrative cost. Looking ahead we expect 2015 results for Tridien will be consistent with 2014. At AFM performance remained robust during the fourth quarter.

Revenue increased by more than 32% compared to the year earlier period representing the 8th consecutive quarter that sales have increased year-over-year. AFM also delivered considerable year-over-year growth in EBITDA driven primarily by greater sales of higher margin new products and a more efficient cost structure.

This business continued to benefit from solid results on large and mid-size accounts and growth in market share. We believe that AFM is poised to build on its momentum for a strong 2015 as demand levels for their products remain strong.

At Clean Earth, results for the fourth quarter were better than we anticipated at the closing of the acquisition in August of 2014. Fourth quarter revenue increased 6% compared to the pro forma prior year period primarily due to increased volume in contaminated soils and hazardous material.

Clean Earth’s fourth quarter EBITDA declined as anticipated by approximately 8.5% compared to the same pro forma period last year due to lower revenue from dredge materials and higher material and backend disposal cost. We anticipate modest growth in Clean Earth results in 2015 as compared to pro forma 2014.

Our newest subsidiary SternoCandleLamp which was acquired on October 10, 2014 performed in line with expectations in the fourth quarter. SternoCandleLamp generated pro forma revenue of 41.2 million up from 40.9 million in the prior year. Fourth quarter pro forma EBITDA was 6.5 million, a slight increase compared to the year ago period.

We are pleased with Sterno's results in the quarter and look forward to working with this experienced management team to grow the business. Looking ahead in 2015, we anticipate modest growth in SternoCandleLamp results as compared to pro forma 2014, in line with the expected growth in the overall economy.

Next I will turn to our branded consumer businesses, which includes ERGObaby, CamelBak, and Liberty. The discussion of results to follow excludes the FOX results. Revenue and EBITDA increased on a combined basis approximately 4% and 1% respectively over the year earlier period.

The combined EBITDA margin declined 50 basis points to 17.7% for the quarter ended December 31, 2014. As Alan mentioned, Liberty Safe had a pronounced effect on our fourth quarter results for our branded consumer businesses. Turning to ERGObaby.

This company delivered another strong quarter posting revenue and EBITDA growth in the fourth quarter of approximately 17% and 24% respectively as compared to the prior year period. Including Q4, this business has now posted double-digit earnings growth on a year-over-year basis for nine out of the past 10 quarters.

This business continued to benefit from the latest product releases that have experienced strong demand across both domestic and international markets.

The award winning ERGObaby 360 the four position carrier introduced in early 2014 is one example of an ERGObaby innovation that has realized remarkable success to-date and continues to be in high demand. We remain excited regarding the prospects of this business and anticipate solid growth in 2015 as compared to 2014.

CamelBak strong fourth quarter performance exceeded our expectations as revenue increased 27% and EBITDA rose 29% compared to the year ago period. CamelBak continued to experience solid demand from its latest product introductions.

CamelBak has also achieved success in growing its business internationally which has offset headwinds from a decline in military sales. On a full year basis, 2014 military sales declined to approximately 21% of overall sales from 29% in 2013. Looking ahead, we anticipate modest growth in 2015 results compared to 2014.

Lastly, Liberty's fourth quarter performance was in line with our revised guidance, as the company generated full year EBITDA of 4.5 million. While fourth quarter revenue and EBITDA declined significantly year-over-year, revenue increased 12% and EBITDA increased $1.2 million on a sequential basis.

Beginning in the second quarter of 2014, Liberty's management proactively worked through excessive inventory levels throughout its supply chain. As a result of these actions, Liberty's balance sheet has improved and the business is well positioned entering 2015.

From an industry perspective, we believe inventory of retail has also right-sized and are starting to see an increase in orders from customers. We are optimistic these trends will result in demand and production levels returning back to normalized levels and that revenue and EBITDA at Liberty will revert to the historical levels of 2011 and 2012.

I'd now like to turn the call over to Ryan to add his comments on our financial results..

Ryan Faulkingham

Thank you, Elias. Today I will discuss our consolidated financial results for the quarter and year ended December 31, 2014. I will limit my comments largely to the overall results for our company and individual subsidiary results are detailed in our Form 10-Q that was filed with the SEC yesterday.

My consolidated revenue discussion will exclude FOX, which we believe is a more meaningful discussion due to the restriction on providing discontinued operations reported for FOX. On a consolidated basis, revenue for the quarter ended December 31, 2014 was 264 million, up 58% as compared to 167.4 million for the prior year period.

The year-over-year increase was mainly attributable to meaningful revenue growth at ERGObaby, CamelBak and AFM and Tridien together with incremental net sales at Clean Earth and SternoCandleLamp from their acquisition dates partially offset by the decrease in revenue at Liberty and Arnold.

Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2014 increased to 832.3 million from 712.8 million for the prior year. Net income for the fourth quarter was 8.9 million compared to a net loss of 5.1 million in the year earlier period. In the 2013 fourth quarter, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of approximately 12 million at our Tridien subsidiary.

For the year ended December 31, 2014 net income was 291.2 million which included a one-time gain of approximately 264.3 million on a deconsolidation of FOX.

Net income for the year ended December 31, 2013 was 78.8 million which included a 61.3 million supplemental put expense reversal in connection with the previously announced termination of the supplemental put agreement. Cash flow for the quarter ended December 31, 2014 was 17.5 million as compared to 9.9 million for the prior year period.

Cash flow for the fourth quarter of 2014 reflects year-over-year growth at our ERGObaby, AFM and CamelBak subsidiary businesses as well as positive contributions from the Advanced Circuits, Sterno and Clean Earth offset by the lower results at Liberty and Arnold.

For the year ended December 31, 2014 cash flow was 58 million as compared to 73.5 million for the prior year. FOX was included in our calculation of CAD last year prior to the successful completion of its IPO in August 2013.

Turning now to the balance sheet, we had $23.7 million in cash and cash equivalents and net working capital of $179.6 million as of December 31, 2014. We had approximately $323 million outstanding on our term debt facility and approximately $170 million in borrowings outstanding under our revolving credit facility as of December 31, 2014.

We have no significant debt maturities until June 2019. In addition, we had borrowing availability of approximately $226 million under our revolving credit facility at year-end. As previously discussed we lowered our ownership in FOX to 41% below our controlling interest through our affected area offering in early July 2014.

As a result of this offering CODI received total net proceeds of approximately 65.5 million and we deconsolidated FOX from our consolidated financial reporting.

The sale of shares in July resulted in a $76 million gain in the third quarter and the deconsolidation resulted in a $188 million accounting gain in the third quarter, totaling 264.3 million of gain.

Further our 15.1 million shares of FOX are now reported as an equity method investment on our balance sheet with the value of 245.2 million as of December 31, 2014. Turning now to capital expenditures.

During the fourth quarter of 2014 we incurred 4.6 million of maintenance capital expenditures and increases compared to maintenance CapEx of 4.3 million for the prior year period. For the full year 2014 we incurred maintenance CapEx of 13.6 million as compared to maintenance CapEx of 14.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2013.

For the full year 2015 we expect to incur maintenance CapEx between 18 million and 22 million and growth CapEx between 3 million and 4 million as we continue to invest on the long-term health for our subsidiary. I will now turn the call back over to Alan. .

Alan Offenberg

Thank you Ryan. To recap we made considerable progress on our long-term goals in 2014. Specifically we continued to actively manage and create value for our family of leading middle market businesses.

Secondly, we acquired two accretive platform companies that will increase our 2015 CAD to a level that we believe will cover our distribution on an annualized basis. Lastly we improved our financial flexibility by accepting capital markets in various equity offerings and generated new debt financing under attractive terms.

I would like to close by commenting briefly on acquisition activity. Currently the M&A environment for middle market businesses remains competitive and valuations remain high.

As we have done in the past we will continue to employ the same disciplined approach to valuation and diligence as we seek to add profitable companies to our family of businesses that need our strict acquisition criteria and have a reason to exist. This concludes our opening remarks and we'll be happy to take any questions you may have.

Operator, please open the phone lines..

Operator

[Operator Instructions]. Our first question comes from Larry Solow with CJS Securities. Your line is open..

Larry Solow

Just a quick more general question. The general polls on the economy it seems to be getting a little better, I guess almost you are -- if you are an NGO related company obviously you wouldn’t say that. But I guess most of your companies probably would not been that.

But I'll tell you -- would you guys sort of agree with that statement over the last in the back half of '14 as enter '15 in terms of just generally how you look at your companies?.

Alan Offenberg

Larry as we think about our group of companies and look at 2015, I think it’s reflected in the comments that we made here today. I think we think that we are in a slow growth economy right now.

And not being economist I certainly don’t think we are prepared to really make prediction beyond that but based on what we see from companies, the economy seems reasonably solid albeit a more of a slow growth mode than a high growth mode..

Larry Solow

And just in terms of energy impact, I guess that Clean Earth and Arnold would have some impact on that.

Did you guys see any of that? Do you anticipate any impact on that? And also FX maybe not on an operational basis but your international sales competitive reasons would that -- maybe impact you guys at all, stronger dollar?.

Alan Offenberg

Interestingly Clean Earth has virtually no impact attributable to energy. They have some businesses located in the Pennsylvania area where the developments -- oil and gas development is happening but it’s a very, very small piece of business. So immaterial really to their results in the context of your question.

And Arnold has had a bit more of an impact although energy represents approximately 10% or less of Arnold's business and not all of that energy business has been impacted by the recent disruption in the energy market as many of their applications are used to reduce the cost associated with oil and gas exploration activities.

So it certainly had an impact, it remains to be seen what type of ongoing impact, but I don’t think that we really anticipate any meaningful degradation to Arnold 's 2015 results associated with anticipated problems in the energy segment..

Larry Solow

And just in terms of couple of your newer acquisitions Sterno and Clean Earth again.

You said you had a few months now to sort of look under the hood, anything positive surprise or negative surprise as you look out?.

Alan Offenberg

Certainly negative surprises and I think I wouldn’t call it positive surprise, but I think as you said after a few months, you do get a different look at a company than you're going to have when you're in the due diligence period.

But we're just really pleased with the strength of the management teams, the strength of the business model and really looking forward to long successful partnerships with both companies..

Larry Solow

Just lastly with a competitive acquisition environment obviously you guys -- still you got to complete two quite nice strategic acquisitions, but prices obviously remain high.

And I know you have most of them done some add-on acquisitions including one this quarter, but might we see a potential acceleration on the small add-in tucking side of the things?.

Alan Offenberg

I think that's something we always pursue, historically we've seen Advanced Circuit do that a lot more recently you've seen Clean Earth do that, Liberty Safe has done a small add-on in the past.

And so that's a model we really like and we think all of our subsidiary company management teams are very capable acquirers and integrators, so that's a model that we have always pursued and we'll continue to pursue. And so I hesitate to call it when acceleration of those efforts rather I'd refer to it as the continuation of those ongoing efforts..

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from Vernon Plack with BB&T Securities. Your line is open..

Vernon Plack

And I was looking for perhaps some more color on SternoCandleLamp, it's a meaningful contributor to total EBITDA.

And just wondering how do you increase cash flow on the company longer term? What are the priorities? Is it focusing on greater market shares, expanding the product offering, maybe operational efficiencies, do you have businesses to it? I'm just -- we'll be interested in your thoughts on SternoCandleLamp..

Elias Sabo Partner & Chief Executive Officer

Vernon its Elias. So Sterno is a very strong market share player in the core canned heat market for food service. So I think, thinking that it will continue to take market share in order to grow is probably not something that is a realistic growth target just because its share is so high.

This is extraordinarily well managed team; it's an incredibly efficient operator. So I think we see a couple of areas of growth.

One is the Sterno brand, it really has great meaning and its core categories and we think it has the ability to be broadened into adjacent markets and on organic basis where we can come into some new adjacencies and develop product in new adjacencies.

Second you hit on acquisition possibilities, this is a really phenomenal management team and very efficient operator as we think that there are some adjacent categories within the distribution channels that we serve currently that we'll be able to acquire into this management team and be able to increase cash flow that way.

So I think it's really kind of more on new product development and acquisition rather than on kind of market share growth.

We also think that the market overall rose in line with the economy and we have no reason to believe that, we would have any market share losses and so we would expect to have just gains that are produced along the lines of economic growth..

Operator

[Operator Instructions]. Our next question comes from Greg Mason with KBW. Your line is open..

Greg Mason

First on the available capital I know you said you have 226 million of borrowing capacity and 245 million of FOX capital.

How do you view your existing availability of capital as you're looking through a market set of potential opportunities? And can you increase that borrowing capacity or is it much more of a fixed basis you'd have to increase equity and debt going forward that bank capacity?.

Alan Offenberg

I think if we were to see our cash flows from our subsidiaries growth we hope that could also had some capacity to the items that you referenced. But I do think you hit on the two largest areas where our capital is going to come from.

And I think relative to our strategy which is a consistent strategy that we have deployed since being a public company. We feel good about that level of capital in the context of it being sufficient to support our add-on as well as platform company acquisition.

I think as we grow our business that’s certainly something we would like to grow as well over the long-term. And as you have seen over the years within our company we sometimes go from periods of having a lot available capital more than what we have that this time to after an acquisition or two finding ourselves with less available capital.

And so those cycles I think will be normal for us as they have been in the past, but right now and as we entered 2015, we feel as we have adequate available capital to execute on our strategy..

Greg Mason

And then looking at Arnold, I know you talked about the oil impact, but what about just the general commodity complex has declined pretty meaningfully. And I know there is a rare earth metals ETF out there it’s down like 30% since August. How is that impacting the business just the decline in the commodities complex..

Alan Offenberg

We don’t believe it has much impact at all the rare entities that you are referring to are largely suppliers of materials to Arnold. And so with that really doesn’t impact Arnold’s end markets so much or their business.

But it is something we obviously pay attention to but at least during the period of our ownership we really have not seen any material impact that Arnold business associated with shifting commodities markets..

Greg Mason

And how could that flow through the cost of goods sold and the end operating profit margin. It looks like cost of sales actually went up in the fourth quarter as commodities are going down.

How is thinking that maybe the cost of goods sold could decline a bit? Could you just talk about that dynamic?.

Alan Offenberg

I think it can have a modest impact depending on the product mix associated with Arnold, but again it’s not like some businesses for example if you look at American Furniture for example where they are huge users of foam and the price of foam one way or another can have a dramatic impact on that company’s margins either negatively or positively.

I don’t believe that Arnold base in similar dynamic with respect to the inputs of the materials that are used to manufacture their magnets and magnetic assemblies..

Operator

Our next question comes from Bob Napoli with William Blair. Your line is open..

Bob Napoli

Given that the environment is so competitive today for new acquisitions and the pricing is high. Are there any thoughts in 2015 around divestments, I mean this is probably a great market is there something that you don’t think fit as well or just the timing was right to do that. And so I was just wondering your thoughts around potential divestments..

Alan Offenberg

Sure, just pointing out before I get to your question directly. The market was very similar in 2014, it’s not exactly the same as what we are seeing today. And we were able to consummate two new platform acquisitions.

And so I think that the markets are always a little bit tough to predict although prior to those two acquisitions we had an extended period of inactivity because we were unable to find companies that we thought provided good risk adjusted returns for our shareholders.

So we are cautiously optimistic that we can find good opportunities to be acquired in 2015. And to answer your question directly, I think that part of our business model has been and will continue to be opportunistically divesting subsidiaries from time-to-time.

So I don’t think 2015 necessarily represents a thought process that is inconsistent with how we done things historically. Although I don’t mean to be dismiss above your question. I mean we do see what’s going on in the market; some of the prices that are paid can help but make you question what some of your subsidiaries maybe worth.

However what we really do focused on first and foremost is to build these businesses both organically and via acquisition to reinvest in the businesses to really plan to own them forever. And if opportunistic opportunities arise for us to consider a divestment, we certainly would consider that..

Bob Napoli

Is there anything today in your portfolio that you think fits less well?.

Alan Offenberg

I will say as probably been said before but I will say it again. That’s like asking me to pick -- to answer you which one of my children do I like more than the other. So I think they all are wonderful bids and I am dodging your question a little bit.

But I will say that we do look at all of our businesses that's in the same way we love them all equally and we will continue to try to optimize and build and grow all of them. And so that's a really hard question for me to answer directly other than in the manner in which I just answered it..

Operator

Thank you. I'm showing no further questions. I would like to turn the call back to management for closing remarks..

Alan Offenberg

I would like to thank everyone again for joining us on today's call and following the CODI story. We look forward to sharing our progress with you in the future..

Operator

This concludes Compass Diversified Holdings conference call. Thank you and have a great day..

ALL TRANSCRIPTS
2024 Q-3 Q-2 Q-1
2023 Q-4 Q-3 Q-2 Q-1
2022 Q-4 Q-3 Q-2 Q-1
2021 Q-4 Q-3 Q-2 Q-1
2020 Q-4 Q-3 Q-2 Q-1
2019 Q-4 Q-3 Q-2 Q-1
2018 Q-4 Q-3 Q-2 Q-1
2017 Q-4 Q-3 Q-2 Q-1
2016 Q-4 Q-3 Q-2 Q-1
2015 Q-4 Q-3 Q-2 Q-1
2014 Q-4 Q-3 Q-2 Q-1