Good morning, and welcome to the Green Plains Inc. and Green Plains Partners’ Fourth Quarter and Full Year Earnings conference call. [Operator Instructions] I will now turn the conference over to your host, Phil Boggs, Senior Vice President, Investor Relations and Treasurer. Mr. Boggs, please go ahead..

Thank you, and welcome to Green Plains Inc. and Green Plains Partners Fourth Quarter 2020 Earnings Call. Participants on today’s call are Todd Becker, President and Chief Executive Officer; Patrich Simkins, Chief Financial Officer; and Walter Cronin, Chief Commercial Officer.

There is a slide presentation available, and you can find it on the investor page under the Events and Presentations link on both corporate websites. During this call, we will be making Forward-Looking Statements, which are predictions, projections or other statements about future events.

These statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties.

Actual results could materially differ because of factors discussed in yesterday’s press releases and the comments made during this conference call and in the Risk Factors section of our Form 10-K, Form 10-Q and other reports and filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We do not undertake any duty to update any forward-looking statement.

Now I would like to turn the call over to Todd Becker..

Thanks, Phil, and good morning, everyone, and thanks for joining our call today. The fourth quarter and the opening weeks of 2021 have been exciting for our company. We have continued to optimize and rationalize our asset portfolio while pursuing strategic investments.

What is most exciting for our shareholders is our partnership with Osprey and funds and accounts managed by BlackRock to acquire Fluid Quip Technologies and expand the use of their technology on a global basis. The partnership not only validates our strategy but help secure Green Plains transformation and creates a leading Ag tech powerhouse team.

We are continuing to execute on opportunities for expanding ultra high-protein and renewable corn-oil production through deployment of flu equips-patented MSC system. In addition, we expanded our production of specialty alcohols by completing our 50 million-gallon USP upgrade and are further expanding the GNS.

And finally, we are beginning to install Fluid Quip’s clean sugar technology at our York Innovation Center campus. All of these initiatives are part of the pivot we are making to transform our business and our future earnings power, and I will come back to each of these initiatives later in the call. Turning to our financial results for the quarter.

We have reported an adjusted net loss of $18.3 million or $0.53 negative a diluted share when adjusting for $22.9 million of noncash-related to the sale of Herford ethanol facility and an $8.4 million tax valuation allowance.

While we are not happy with the bottom line results, driving demand due to COVID has still not recovered, so we can focus on what we can control and how we manage risk. We reported $9.4 million in adjusted EBITDA for the quarter, and our consolidated crush margin was $0.06 a gallon.

Another quarter of positive margins, partly due to our risk management strategies and a slight benefit from our industrial alcohol and protein businesses. As in prior quarters, margins were impacted negatively by having some assets idled. Our liquidity position is strong and growing, and we are well positioned to execute on our transformation plan.

We ended the year with $275 million in cash as well as $45 million remaining on our delayed draw term loan with MetLife. The proceeds from the pending sale of Ord will also provide an estimated $37 million to green plans at its close as well as an additional $27 million to Green Plains partners that will be used to reduce their debt.

Additionally, we just completed a $125 million mezzanine note facility with funds and accounts managed by BlackRock, providing additional financing to accelerate implementation of ultra high-protein technology.

While mezzanine debt is not our only or best choice, obviously, the relationship we cemented is an extremely important factor, combined with other financings and available alternatives, our blended cost of capital remains very beneficial for our shareholders.

The combination of these financing initiatives enable us to accelerate capital to our higher returning initiatives. More importantly, is our partnership resulting from this financing relationship as we look at other opportunities in the future to build, acquire and grow the company.

From an operational standpoint, we are nearing completion of the Mount Vernon Project 24 upgrade, which is start-up during the first quarter. Our Madison location is expected to be completed during the third quarter.

At this time, we have deferred the decision to continue Project 24 at Atkinson in New York in order to pursue higher returning projects such as GNS Great Alcohol at York, Atkinson is under consideration to be our first clean sugar location, but a final decision has not been made yet.

Our Project 24 plants have reduced energy and water usage, lowering operating costs and more importantly, resulted in a better carbon footprint. Once Madison is completed, we anticipate we will achieve operating costs below $0.24 a gallon across our field vary plants, even without Atkinson.

During the quarter, we produced 214 million gallons of ethanol, which equates to a 76% utilization rate. Contributions from protein, distillers grains and renewable corn-oil have benefited margins as we are seeing our thesis play out that the world is demanding additional protein and vegetable oils.

The weekly EIA data continues to reflect an imbalance as production has remained above 930,000 barrels per day range, while overall gas demand has remained suppressed and inventory stocks have been consistently over 23 million barrels. With that said, 2020 exports were better than expected. And when the U.S.

consumer returns to driving, we expect margins to recover nicely, especially if China truly returns to buying ethanol from us. The rest of the world recovery will be helpful as well. Green Plains Partners continue to generate stable cash flows, protected by long-term minimum volume commitments.

As of December 31, $30 million has been repaid on the debt since it was refinanced last June, including $10 million from the Hereford transaction. Now I would like to turn the call over to Patrich to review both Green Plains Inc.

and Green Plains Partners financial performance, and I will come back on the call to talk more specifically about our ongoing initiatives and how Fluid Quip fits into our transformation line..

Thank you, Todd, and good morning, everyone. Consolidated revenues were $478.8 million in the fourth quarter, down $236.9 million or 33.1% from the same period a year ago, with the change being driven by both lower production run rates and ethanol prices as well as lower export volumes in our Ag and energy segment.

For the quarter, our run rates were 75.7% of capacity compared to an 84.5% run rate for the same period a year ago.

For the fourth quarter, Green Plains realized a net loss of $49.6 million or $1.43 per share, inclusive of a $22.9 million noncash loss related to the sale of our Herford facility and an $8.4 million charge related to an increase in our valuation allowance on deferred tax assets.

Accounting for these items, our adjusted net loss was $18.3 million or $0.53 per share relatively unchanged to an adjusted net loss of $18.6 million or $0.53 per share for the fourth quarter of the prior year.

Adjusted EBITDA, which excludes the loss on the sale of assets, was $9.4 million for the fourth quarter, down slightly from an adjusted EBITDA of $11.2 million for the same period a year ago as improvements in the consolidated crush for 2020 compared to the prior year were offset by a decline in Ag and energy contributions and the sale of our capital business.

For the quarter, our SG&A cost of all segments was $22.8 million, which was $2.2 million higher than the $20.6 million reported in Q4 of 2019, driven primarily by higher insurance cost and slightly higher property taxes and professional fees.

Consolidated interest expense for the company was $10.5 million, which was higher by $1.8 million compared to the $8.7 million in Q4 of 2019, due primarily to a higher interest costs related to GPP financing and our utilization of our delayed draw term facility to finance protein construction at our Wood River plant.

On Slide 9 of our investor deck, we provide a summary of our balance sheet highlights. We had $302.8 million of cash and net of working capital financing at the end of the fourth quarter compared to $275.3 million for the prior year quarter.

Our liquidity position at the end of the quarter consisted of $274.8 million in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash along with approximately $332 million available primarily under our working capital revolvers and delayed draw term loan. This amount also includes $5 million available under the current credit facility of the partnership.

CapEx for the fourth quarter was $19.1 million, including $3.9 million of maintenance CapEx with the balance of $15.2 million being allocated to growth capital, primarily for our high-protein and Project 24 initiatives.

For the year, we invested $106.4 million in capital with approximately $18.1 million supporting maintenance CapEx and the balance going to fund our high-protein technology construction and Project 24 build-out.

As we look at capital allocation for 2021, we are focused on completing Project 24 initiatives and accelerating our protein technology build out with the announced protein projects and the anticipated rollout to additional sites during the year.

For 2021, depending on market conditions and construction timing, our CapEx is projected to be between $200 million and $225 million, including the completion of protein technology at Wood River, the start of projects at Obion and Mount Vernon as well as two additional sites. Maintenance CapEx for the year is expected to be approximately $20 million.

For Green Plains Partners, we had 215 million gallons of throughput volume at our ethanol storage assets during the quarter, which was down 25 million gallons or 10% from the fourth quarter of 2019 as a result of lower production rates at Green Plains Plants.

However, as a result of minimum volume commitment contracts with Green Plains trade, the partnership build trade group at the MVC level, which was amended to 30 0.45 million gallons of throughput after the sale of Herford.

Accordingly, the partnership reported an adjusted EBITDA of $13.8 million for the quarter, up slightly from the $13.3 million reported in the third quarter 2019, mainly due to a 6% increase in throughput rates charged by GPP, offset slightly by other ancillary costs.

For the partnership, distributable cash flow was $11.3 million for the quarter compared to $11.2 million for the same quarter of 2019.

On a last 12-month basis, adjusted EBITDA was $54.2 million, distributable cash flow was $45.4 million and declared distributions were $11.4 million, resulting in a 3.99 coverage ratio for the trailing 12-months and a 3.98 coverage ratio for the fourth quarter.

Our coverage ratio excludes any adjustment for required principal payments amortized during the period. Now I would like to turn the call back over to Todd..

once completed, we believe our base sustainable ultra high-protein platform will produce $150 million of EBITDA before we begin to move up the J curve with higher protein purities and improved characteristics previously discussed, and we are already starting to see some of those. Our renewable corn-oil platform has significant upside.

A $0.10 per pound move would add $35 million to $40 million when all protein construction is completed. Our Specialty Alcohol business at York and Wood River could River could at least provide $75 million of baseline EBITDA.

And finally, developing two commercial clean sugar systems converting 150 million gallons of ethanol capacity, which we believe could be in place by 2025, could add a baseline $100 million or more of EBITDA.

This is at a conservative $0.15 to $0.16 per pound glucose dextrose pricing, yet the market trade is higher than that today for certain qualities and quantities. We expect the cost of these systems to be below $1 per gallon equivalent, and the returns are very compelling.

We anticipate beginning to design and engineer our first large-scale system over the next several months.

One thing that is really important is that prior to the Fluid Quip acquisition, they already had a larger scale, 25,000 bushel per day CST system in operation for crude dextrose and we are using York to validate the scale-up as our smallest location is at least double that size. So it is not really a matter of if, but a matter of when.

We also believe the IP has significant value. On top of all that, we expect our initiatives around growing optimal aqua, carbon mitigation and Fluid Quip’s traditional business could add additional upside.

So when you add all these up, I can make the case that in 2024 and beyond, we believe we could have a baseline EBITDA of near $300 million to over $400 million and going higher with no contribution from our fuel business, which would be unlikely as demand will recover and expanded blends like the governor of Iowa just announced will be more prevalent.

We have also mapped out where we can see an upside case significantly higher than what we just laid out, driven by upside in protein and clean sugar. As we look back on 2020 and the challenges we have overcome, we are well positioned to accelerate our transformation of Green Plains 2.0 and beyond.

Through the efforts of our dedicated employees, we have accomplished much. We are actively redefining the margin opportunities as achievable at Green Plains. And as we transform our bio-refineries to produce innovative new low carbon and sustainable ingredients that matter to a growing world.

Thanks for joining in the call today, and we will start the Q&A..

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Craig Irwin with Roth Capital Partners..

Good morning and thanks for taking my questions. Hey Todd Congratulations on the progress recently. So one thing that really caught my attention, I want to make sure I heard this perfectly clearly, is your CapEx guide, $200 million to $225 million this year.

We have been talking about Wood River and Obion for a while, but adding Vernon and two additional sites to the hyper plant, it seems like you are pulling this forward moving a little bit faster now that you have the capital or the financing to move forward.

And is it fair for us to think that there is probably around another a $50 million to $70 million to complete those additional locations in 2022?.

Yes. We are going to move as fast as we can, and it is going to be subject to, obviously availability of contractors, general contractors, equipment and all of what we can achieve in the quickest amount of time. Our goal is to have five to seven of these units under construction.

And with our recent announcement as yesterday as well as the additional opportunities that we are seeing, we want to try and accelerate as quickly as we can, and that is what we are working on. So 220 is the baseline. If we can move faster than that and start others up, then I would say we would go after that opportunity.

But again, it takes between engineering design and build, it is about a year total of construction and design time..

And Craig, that would leave about $140 million left to go. So that would really bridge 2022, 2023..

Got it, got it. Okay. Excellent. So then this Fluid Quip acquisition, congratulations. It seems that it is really allowing you to move faster and do a lot of really interesting things.

Can you comment about whether or not this is one of the key factors that is allowing you to move forward on these additional plants? Is there any technology development that you are maybe seeing earlier that you could be adopting here? What are the synergies that you are seeing from Fluid Quip at this point? And how does this inform the strategy of rolling out the rest platform?.

Fluid Quip’s IP portfolio is very strong, and it is strong in multiple aspects, which is why we are moving as fast as we can. It starts with protein.

The demand for protein is so massive around the world and continues to grow every year that we want to make sure that we move as fast as we can to get the baseline earnings in-line with what we have previously indicated to the market. On top of that, we are moving fast with our partnerships to add value in multiple different ways to this product.

As we have said, one of the things is we believe it is one of the most perfect aqua feeds that have been developed in many years. And with that, what we want to be able to do is use our strategic partnerships between Novozymes and Hayashikane to increase the value of the product. Novozymes isn’t just all about protein purities.

Novozymes is about enhancing the ability to have this product be designed for different needs of the different consuming species.

For example, we have met with a group of pet food met with a customers, Novozymes, Green Plains and pet food customers to ask them and look for what are they short and deficient in the feed and how do we use the yeast to express those shortages or deficiencies, and we are making progress there. We have met with dairy customers for the same reason.

Let’s go after the amino acid expression of things that they are short, things that are readily available, and we are making progress there.

On the Hayashikane side, by adding that ingredient to our overall product, we can really start to drive taste profiles and yields in land-based aquaculture systems, which are just starting to gain traction in the United States, but it is the fastest-growing protein consumed in the world today. So when we look at that, that is the first reason.

The second reason is really driving up using that technology to go after and liberate more of the corn-oil that is available in the kernel. If you think about it, the corn and the kernel, there is 1.8 pounds of oil per bushel of corn, which is 56 pounds.

Today, a traditional ethanol plant usually liberates about 0.8 pounds with a Fluid Quip system we immediately start to liberate up to 1.2 pounds and Fluid Quip is working very hard on adding technology to go after all of that available corn-oil up to 1.8 pounds, and we think we are going to make progress there.

In addition, lastly, on protein, at least from that perspective, 3.5 pounds per bushel was a baseline we can go after more protein as well. And so we want to get our plants up and running.

But we know that our technology, while keeping the remaining product intact and valuable, can go up to four or five pounds per bushel and make more and more high-quality proteins.

And so bringing them in-house is really allows them to go after more and more development of their IP and allows us to move very fast to roll these out while also building other plants for other customers of Fluid Quip. So I think that is very important is that we are a customer of Fluid Quip as much as we already shareholder of Fluid Quip.

And Fluid Quip has many customers around the world from Poland to Canada, South America to China to the United States. And their portfolio has been rolled out across the world, and we were going to look to see that continue even in protein technologies in South America.

So between that, I mean, obviously, the clean sugar, which we think is very exciting. It has been very beneficial and synergistic to become a large shareholder of the company..

Great. More protein is a good segue into the next question I wanted to ask. Shenandoah, you have been operating that, I guess, roughly 10-months at this point. Originally, you told us you are aiming for 50% or better. You start at 51%. Last call, I think you said you were averaging around 53%.

Have we climbed higher are we potentially in the 54% range now? And can you maybe share with us any other key developments at Shenandoah as we look for the opportunity to improve the economics of this technology economics of this technology going forward?.

Yes. And we have consistently been in that range. Because what we wanted to do is get consistent production on a daily basis of 52% to 53% protein with the yields that we want to achieve to achieve maximum initial payback.

You can assume that we are continuing our development to achieve higher protein purities and move up the J-curve as well as add other nutritional characteristics through expression in the yeast and also then bring in ingredients to change taste profiles as well. More to come on that. I think we are making some advances as we speak.

And as we get more and more results, we will have to bring those to you, but you can assume we are working very hard to get up the J-curve..

Great. And then lastly, Novozymes. This is the exciting technology side that, I guess, maybe gets us into aquaculture in the future.

Can you maybe share with us the breadth of development programs that you are looking at with Novozymes what is the general status? What is the time line before we start seeing things visibly as investors looking to understand the potential here?.

Yes. This is a very powerful partnership. When you take a look at all of the partnerships that we have put together around this IP, whether it is the ownerships in Fluid Quip and the shareholders that have come into to this powerful platform. And if you think about Ag tech, look at the powerful shareholders we put together because this is true Ag tech.

And Novozymes, on the other side as a partner has been really an incredible opportunity for both companies. And so we are working very hard with them on several initiatives. We are doing joint meetings on several different species. We are using the York Innovation Center, as we speak, to look at several opportunities as well.

And as we have successes, which we are starting to see some come to fruition, we will be able to report those back to you. But I can tell you that everything we expected out of this partnership and more is beyond our expectations at this point. And I think we will have some exciting announcements in the future on that..

Great. Congratulations on the put forward hypo..

Thank you..

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Adam Samuelson with Goldman Sachs. Your line is now open..

Great, thank you. good morning everyone. So Todd, a lot of ground covered there going through the strategic plan and the opportunity set. I just want to think about maybe in the first in the near-term, just we do still have a - ethanol market that is not particularly well balanced.

And maybe we can get a lot of color on kind of your view of the ethanol market this year. And maybe just first, just help us think about how you are seeing things as it stand today, and kind of where opportunities could exist in the back half of the year, if driving miles get better, exports to China improve maybe just like that..

Yes. Look, as we know, the ethanol market last year with COVID and reduced driving has definitely suffered, coming off of a year where demand or that margins were low prior to that. And so we have got work to do as an industry to rationalize or balance ourselves relative to demand.

I think what we saw today with a big draw on stocks was a nice to see, but we have a lot of work to do. And we remained last year to have a pretty good export program in 2020, although we could have certainly used a lot more than that. And so while we are coming into 2021, continue to be oversupplied. Margins continue to remain under pressure.

There are some positives. Obviously, driving should recover. We get into summer driving season. We are looking forward to that. The vaccine, while certainly is slow to roll out, ultimately overtime, should be helpful to driving demand. And then obviously, returning of the export program.

And while we saw the first 200 million or so gallons sold to China, hard to say whether that is a program or not or whether that is an opportunity. But when they finally have come back into the market, obviously, we are excited for that as well.

So if we see like-for-like this year versus last year relative to what we are able to sell in a COVID year, hopefully, exports go higher. It is really going to come down to when does the consumer drive more. And I think that is really what we are waiting for, and margins will probably remain under pressure for that.

But look, I think we have set ourselves up very well. We got through 2020. We have got through 2019. We have less debt than we had before we got to 2019, and we are in a better balance sheet capacity today.

We have plenty of liquidity, and we continue to structure ourselves very well and manage the risk aggressively and try to at least get out of the way of some of this margin volatility..

Okay. And that all is really helpful.

And so maybe going back to the strategic plan, and think about kind of where you get to in 2024, you gave the CapEx number for this year from looking through the way you presented this between what is left to spend on high-protein and the investments in clean sugar, we are talking about $400 million to $500 million of capital to spend between now and I guess, the end of 2023, really, depending on how quickly the clean sugar progresses.

As we think about kind of the balance sheet where it sits, cash, you got the two financing arrangements. You have got cash in the door from the Plant sale, and you have got potential cash flow between now and then.

So what do we think the right - how do you think about the capital structure as we get to this new baseline and move forward? And that is some of that 100 books today is the converts.

So just to make sure I’m trying to think about the balance sheet, what we look like when we get to this on state?.

Yes. Our goal is not to have the debt levels that we have had in the past, obviously, with over $1 billion of debt in the past, I don’t see ourselves doing that again. Our goal is, obviously - funding has been a strategy through partnerships, through divestitures, through monetizations and using cash.

And I think we have done a pretty good job to lay out at least getting through protein. Now if sugar is successful in New York and we decide to build those first two plants, obviously, that is not in our funding plan yet, but the payback is much quicker on that than it is on protein.

And so I don’t think we would have any problem from that perspective, whether construction financing or some type of partnership financing to get those built because they are very fast paybacks. And so that is not in our capital plan yet today. But obviously, in 2020, we are very confident we will be successful.

So that is probably the next stage of our capital plan. I don’t see us really changing our portfolio mix too much today on what we have. We kind of did what we needed to do in terms of monetizing assets.

And what we have left, I think, is, especially since we put all the money into Project 24, getting through finishing that and having a platform that operates at a very high level in this industry, I think, is a key factor. And then from there, obviously, gives and takes, we will have to be considered.

But overall, I would say protein is just about funded, notwithstanding other things that can come into play. Sugar would need to be, obviously, you come into a funding plan there. But overall, I don’t see us exploding our balance sheet with a bunch of debt to get that done because I don’t think it takes that either.

So I think, obviously, cash flows from these projects start to kick in and help pay as well..

Okay. great. It is all really helpful color. I will pass it on. Thank you..

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Jordan Levy with Truist Securities. Your line is now open..

Hey guys.

Todd, you talked on this briefly, but knowing the larger macro demand for protein, could you just kind of touch on the demand you are seeing from your customers for your products specifically in markets you are currently in, like pet and then also in the markets that you are exploring, dairy, poultry, aqua and that sort of thing and how that kind of ties into the potential for off-take agreements down the road as you get these plants online?.

Yes. I mean, this is about substitution replacement and adding value, and that is what we are trying to do with working with customers. We could sell every bit of our protein out today. If we want to just sell it as a generic soybean meal equivalent protein, I can have that sold out in under 10 minutes.

But that is not really where we believe we fit into the value chain because our product isn’t just protein is protein and yeast. Our products is 25% yeast. And so when you think about the price of yeast, by adding our product into many of these species, you are getting additional advantages. And that is really what we are working with the customers.

So in each of the species, obviously, pet very important. We are in our second year of our PET program, Pred Offtake, where they continue to increase their volumes, not decrease them. Our customers continue to change formulations, and we are in the middle of a palatability study as well on higher protein purities from the initial start.

So we are doing a lot of work around pet, and we think that will be a key cornerstone market for us. As exciting as that, though, is we are now starting to work with large dairy, some of the largest in the United States who are now using our product.

And that is probably new since the last conference call is where we really weren’t in dairy at the time. But we have seen in our dairy studies as well as working with our customers, enhanced yields, milk yields, enhanced quality, enhanced performance.

And we are in very early stages with working with our customers, but that is a new vertical for us that we really just started shipping last quarter, but now we are in dairy. We are in Aqua as we speak.

Our fish are being fed today and customers fish are being fed today with our products, driven by our relationship on innovation with Novozymes and our relationship on feed quality and taste profiles with Hashitani and really creating a cleaner, better tasting, healthier fish.

And that is kind of what we are going after with our partners and getting them the characteristics that they want as well by using these technology partnerships. So we are in aqua today, and we are expanding relationships there, both domestically and globally. We are working very hard to do that.

And then lastly, in poultry, not just around using it for all veg, we are starting to see characteristics come in play there. But even more exciting, again, as we talked about, is our post-MSC DDGs. And that is the product that we are making after the process. That is a more consistent, better quality, less variability around that market as well.

So we are making great advances. But again, if we just want to commoditize it, sell it as high-protein soybean meal, that is $0.12 to $0.15 a gallon right there anyways. We can make that phone call and probably get multiple years of our products sold in under 10 minutes at high-protein soybean meal prices, which, by the way, is a great return as well.

That is still under a three-year payback on the project. Our goal is to move up that J-curve as rapidly as we can..

That is great color. And just for my second question, knowing that clean sugar is still in the really early innings of its build out and you guys looking into that. Just you mentioned in yesterday’s release that you have got 40-plus discussions going on with different parties.

Could you just discuss kind of how you see that market playing out over the next few years? And where you see the opportunity set and how that fits into the overall 2.0 strategy?.

Yes. So I think what the market should be clear is that clean sugar has been done with Fluka before. They did it at a much larger scale than we are doing it at York. In fact, they did it at a 25,000 bushel a day scale, which is about half of a 50-million-gallon plant. And it ran very well, and they made crude dextrose.

So they didn’t have to make refined, they didn’t have to make crude grade, but they dint make crude dextrose, so all you have to do after that is refine it and make it a better product.

But they have run much bigger systems and what we want to do is bring it back to York, which is a facility that has literally a mini ethanol plant in there that you can transform into a clean sugar system. So we are going to bring it back so we can engineer a larger system.

So we are further down the road on our development and probably some people understand because of their stuff they did before we became partners with the team and brought in other partners, which is why I think the value of this IP portfolio has yet to be, I think, action - realized by people looking at what we have been able to do here with our partners.

So that is very exciting. And then when you look at the 40 or even more partners that we are working with, it is everybody from food to industrial chemicals, to anything regarding fermentation, all the way into green chemicals and industrial biotech and synthetic biology.

And you can probably start to get some names, but what you are not going to give out, but as well as confectionery. That is another market that we have already shift clean sugar to in the past who have made products that are on the shelves today with our refined dextrose. And so this isn’t really going to be a matter of if we can make it.

It is just a matter of scaling it and when we are going to make it at scale. And obviously, it is what a wet mill does today, and the margins are healthy relative to making fuel. And we have very strong IP around that, and we will protect that IP as well..

Great. Thanks so much Todd..

Thank you. appreciate it..

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Ben Bienvenu with Stephens, Inc. Your line is now open..

Hey good morning everybody. I want to ask, clearly, the pace of the transformation is accelerating and financing and partnerships, augment the pace of the transformation.

Todd, if you staffed your fingers and had unlimited capital, would that further accelerate the pace of the transformation or there - you mentioned engineering, operational bandwidth dynamics that we need to be mindful of as well, kind of help us think about rank ordering the constraints around accelerating the transformation that is underway..

Yes obviously, unlimited capital would accelerate everything because you can certainly push harder and push faster. And we are always managing between or 1.0 margin volatility and 2.0 capital needs, but we still have to manage through that and manage our business accordingly because we always want to have strong liquidity and a strong balance sheet.

And that is - if you go back and look at the 12 or 13 past years of Green Plains, we always had strong liquidity and a strong balance sheet to manage through margin volatility. So we always have to take that into consideration on how fast and how hard we press.

But unlimited capital at this point, obviously, at the right price because that is important as well. Could accelerate us. And probably get us into maybe save six-months off the time line, but I’m not sure that it is going to make a dramatic effect at this point. I think we have a good plan.

And if and as we need capital as we develop the plan further, whether it is through the expansion in clean sugar or enhanced oil recoveries or other things like that. Obviously, we will have to develop financing structures and strategies around that. But I’m not sure you can go much faster just because of the constraints on the system at this point..

Yes. Okay. Great. And then my second question, you made some comments around the national LCFS program, and forgive me for not knowing this.

But I’m curious to know how active are you in selling into LCFS markets today like California with your existing product portfolio? And by intension, obviously, a national LCFS program or even state-by-state LCFS programs that are being are being discussed, give us a sense of how accretive that would be to your kind of margin per gallon equation?.

Yes. So obviously, we sold our Hereford plant, which was a low-carbon plan, but it didn’t fit with our overall strategy in protein, oil and sugar at the time. And it was the right thing to do. And we get to participate in the future through the earn-out of reducing their CI scores by sequestering carbon.

I think we are going to see the spread of a California model across several states, if not across the United States and nationally and globally as well. And this is just the beginning of it. And I think that is where the re-rating of ethanol plants and what we do and how we do it.

I think sequestering carbon from an ethanol plant is not a - if it is going to transformation is accelerating and happen.

But when it is going to happen, and reducing our CI scores significantly from in the 60s and 70s into the 20s and the 30s and the 40s is very possible, if not all the way down to net 0 carbon for what we do because of other things that ethanol plants are doing these days.

And so when we look at our participation today, for us, we are focused on something a little bit different today than just LCFS markets. We have a plant that ships into California. We have a couple of plants that actually ship into California today and can take some advantage of that.

But we really need more volume, bigger programs, national rollouts and more states to do it. And really a scheme around what does it mean when an ethanol plant gets the 30 carbon, 30 CI scores? And what does it mean when an ethanol plant gets to zero or negative CI? which I think is coming as well in our industry.

And so I think that we are on the path of that, and I think it is going to be somewhat of a surprise to the outside looking in at traditional Gen 1, 1.0 ethanol that they have the capability and we have the capabilities to sequester carbon at such a rate. And I think the important thing is what we have looked at is that it can meet the gold standard.

When you look at what we do, we can meter every single ton of carbon that we sequester, and we can monitor it and measure it. And it is not just a dream. I mean you can truly - and you are seeing ethanol companies do that in the United States producers.

That if they can sequester, you can actually monitor it, measure it and have real impacts to what the market is looking for. So I’m optimistic, and I think it is going to happen. I think that you are going to see red states and blue states, all kind of move to some of these standards and potentially move to a national standard..

Yes. Okay. Great. Thanks for the color and best of luck..

Thank you..

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Laurence Alexander with Jefferies. Your line is now open..

It is Dan Rizzo on for Lawrence, thanks for taking the question.

On the new high-protein platform, can you quantify even roughly the amount shipped to-date in the average sales price and the amount you expect to ship over the next couple of quarters and a reasonable range for the average sales price?.

Yes. That is not something we typically give out in quantity and price, except to say that we are achieving significant premiums, as expected. We are working with customers on ASPs. And depending on the protein we ship or the use of the product, ASPs may fluctuate a bit, but we are achieving our initial goals that we thought.

And we are achieving our initial production volumes that we indicated or that we thought would happen as well..

Okay. Thank you very much..

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Eric Stine with Craig-Hallum. Your line is now open..

Good morning, thanks for all the details. I do apologize if you have already touched on this. But just on the clean sugars side of it, you mentioned that Atkinson would likely be the first, and I think in your 2025 outlook that you plan to have 2.

I mean is that something we should look at as a baseline, something that potentially comes in higher than that given the economics, And I believe it is kind of the typical CapEx, is it $1 a gallon? Is that how we should think about it?.

Yes. I mean, we are definitely looking at Atkinson. It is a small plant. It is a good location. The only thing it is lacking rail, but it does have all truck capacity, which a lot of stuff gets shipped out in totes. And it is a plant in a good location to procure the inputs. But again, that decision hasn’t been made yet.

I would say when we look at, there will be one of our smaller plants and one of our larger plants, that we are looking at for the 2025 number, would be a 50 million or 60 million-gallon plan and 120 million-gallon plant for conversion. And that is kind of how we are thinking about that..

Got it. And maybe just lastly, I mean you have touched on a lot of here, but on alcohol, I know you are up at York and Wood River. It sounds like you missed kind of the window for 2021.

As you get towards the end of this year and sending those contracts for 2022, I mean, is that something that you think you expand or do you think that you stick with what you have got in terms of USP at those two locations? Because obviously, you have got your hands full and you are focusing hard on high pro and also clean sugars..

Yes. Obviously, York, as we always said, we are fortunate. It is a bit of a unicorn. The quality is so high that we produced or whether it was FCC, now USP going to GNS.

I think that is what is really important is that we want to hit the GNS moniker by end of the second quarter and be able to catch the procurement cycle of 2022 and consumer products companies, especially around GNS and very high-quality alcohol. And then obviously, upgrade Wood River to USP from FCC, which is something else as well.

And we are working with all of the major consumer products companies that by product like this. But again, they buy it towards the end of the year under normal procurement cycle. And without us having a USP product operating at the time, they didn’t know what our quality would be, now they do. Everybody is very excited about our quality.

It is a full-scale USP system. It is not just running it over some carbon filter. And thinking you are making a good quality product. This is actually a full-scale distillation system that we put in place to make what we believe is one of the highest qualities out there.

And so it is just now just a matter of time to get into the sales cycle and things like that. Again, it is not going to be a huge focus in terms of the strategy, but it is a big focus because our quality is so good, and the customers really like the product.

And so while certainly not the absolute part of our strategy, it is a great contributor to our 2025 - and well, actually 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025 earnings once everything is live, especially when we get to GNS.

So very exciting, and we think we have developed as previously announced relationships with some of the top brands in the United States, and that is really paying dividends for us now as we execute on better qualities..

Okay. very helpful. Thanks..

Thanks..

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Ken Zaslow with Bank of Montreal. Your line is now open..

Hey good morning guys. I have really two quick questions. We have covered a lot.

One is, did you say that the spread between ethanol and corn will become relatively irrelevant by 2024 for you, and that all your profitability will come from the other parts of the corn?.

No. I mean our view is that when we give you our 2024, 2025 outlook, we are going to put zero contribution in for ethanol and the obviously we can decide what to do with that later.

And so what we didn’t want to do is cloud the fact of any margin volatility and just say, hey, this is going to be our baseline earnings on all of our initiatives, and then ethanol will be obviously a contributor or could take some of that away at times as well.

But I think when you look at the wet mills in the United States, they don’t talk about ethanol, but they make it, because they split the same corn kernel up into 200 different products, and we split it up into under 10 different products, and we are going after some of those high-value products. So our goal is to leave it in the rearview manner.

And while we certainly will give you guidance in the future on where the ethanol margin is, you will see less and less of that, hopefully, as we roll out higher value, higher-margin products..

And then the just a second follow-up is, did you allude to the fact that you don’t truly believe that maybe truly believe that maybe one of your peers or competitors who indicated that there was 200 million gallons of demand from China is real? It just sounded like you seemed a little bit more skeptical than that.

Is that the read that I got? And then I will leave it there..

No, no, that was actually real demand, and we were happy to see it. Now we want to see more. So the question you have to ask yourself, is it a program or was it a purchase? And that is really what we are trying to figure out is are they coming back for more? The window is open.

When you look at corn prices in China and you look at ethanol prices in China and actually, plants are shutting down because of corn prices in China, the window is open to import a lot more ethanol into China. But I think there has got to be more of a program than just a purchase.

And so I’m always - anybody that knows has been listening to our college for many years. China is always a nice to have, and I hope they buy a lot more. But I can’t build my business plan around that, but it is a fantastic thing that they bought 200 million gallons.

And I think hopefully, they continue that through 2021, because the window is wide open for them to import more from a price perspective, even with the tariffs..

How will you be able to accept if it is a program or if it is a just a one-off buy like, obviously, in hindsight, you will be? But what are the markers that you are looking for to maybe give you confidence one way or the other way? And then I will leave it there..

Yes. We have, obviously, relationships in China with the importers. We have relationships in China on the policy side. And the question really is, when does it become a policy? When does it get published? Is it just a one-time? We will let you import it, and then we will see how it goes.

And it is really going to be around what do we see on policy changes. Obviously, they are still focused on carbon emissions, but they are still focused on their blending strategy. Even though a couple of years ago, it kind of got pushed to the side. It seems to be that, that is starting to rear its head again.

And it is really about hearing more about policy than it is just about opportunistic purchases. And so that is where we are waiting to see to get more excited, but don’t get me wrong. It is a great thing to sell 200 million gallons, which is, what four million or five million barrels that is potentially in an oversupplied market.

And maybe that is one of the reasons we saw some draws this week..

Great. Thank you very much. Have a good day..

Alright. Thank you..

Thank you. There are no further questions. I would now like to turn the call back to Todd Becker for closing remarks..

Yes. Thanks, everybody, for coming on the call. Obviously, a lot going on. We appreciate your support. You can see that what we are doing is trying to create a lot of value. We are really focused on getting through the next couple of years, getting to 2023 and 2024 and starting to get a baseline opportunity for ourselves. And we think it is possible.

We think it is probable, and we think the value of the portfolio that we are putting together is obvious, and the value of the partnerships that we are putting together is even more obvious. And giving us great affirmation and great validation of what we are doing. So I appreciate your support, and we will talk to you next quarter..

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today’s conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect..