TSE - NYSE

Good morning, ladies and gentlemen and welcome to the Trinseo First Quarter 2025 Financial Results Conference Call. We welcome the Trinseo management team, Frank Bozich, President and CEO; David Stasse, Executive Vice President and CFO; and Bee van Kessel, Senior Vice President, Corporate Finance and Investor Relations. Today’s conference call will include brief remarks by the management team, followed by a question-and-answer session. The company distributed its press release along with its presentation slides after close of market on Wednesday, May 7. These documents are posted on the company’s Investor Relations website and furnished on a Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. [Operator Instructions] I will now hand the call over to Bee van Kessel.

Thank you, Greg and hello everyone. At this time, all participants are in listen-only mode. After our brief remarks, instructions will follow to participate in the question-and-answer session. Our disclosure rules and cautionary notes on forward-looking statements are noted on Slide 2. During this presentation, we may make certain forward-looking statements, including issuing guidance and describing our future expectations. We must caution you that actual results could differ materially from what is discussed, described, or implied in these statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ include, but are not limited to, risk factors set forth in Item 1A of our annual report on Form 10-K or in our other filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The company undertakes no obligation to update or revise its forward-looking statements. Today’s presentation includes certain non-GAAP financial measurements. A reconciliation of these measurements to the corresponding GAAP measures is provided in our earnings release and in the appendix of our investor presentation. A replay of the conference call and transcript will be archived on the company’s Investor Relations website shortly following the conference call. The replay will be available until May 8, 2026. Now, I would like to turn the call over to Frank Bozich.

Thanks, Bee, and welcome to our first quarter 2025 earnings call. Core business results in the first quarter were in line with expectations and sequentially higher due to seasonality and prior quarter customer destocking. Despite persistent market weakness, the first quarter was Trinseo’s seventh consecutive quarter of improved year-over-year adjusted EBITDA improvement, driven by various management actions we took early in this industry downturn. Against the backdrop of trade uncertainty and lower consumer confidence, our adjusted EBITDA improved to $65 million. This is up $20 million versus prior year as a result of restructuring actions we’ve taken, improved business mix, and the polycarbonate licensing agreement we previously announced. Our focus has been on executing actions aligned to our transformation strategy and driving growth in areas that represent opportunities in any business environment. The levers we possess to continue growing our more specialized technologies are specifically related to geographic expansion, material replacement, process change, and sustainability. With this focus, in the first quarter, we grew our volume in recycled content-containing products by 33% over prior year, consumer electronic applications by 43%, PMMA resin volumes in Asia more than doubled, and case volumes grew by 3% in a flat demand environment. Last year, we announced our proprietary asset and technology license deal with Deepak Chem Tech, and with the recognition of $26 million in licensing income in Q1 this year, I’m pleased to say the projects are on track and delivering in line with their expectations. In total, we estimate these projects are worth $52 million. As our 2 companies work together, we continue to view this agreement as mutually beneficial and see this as the initial steps of a strategic and collaborative partnership in India. Before I turn the call over to Dave, I’d also like to talk a bit about China as a growth market. We’ll cover tariffs later on. While we believe India will be a broad growth opportunity for us, in China, we have been more focused on our more specialized products in our portfolio. For the last couple of years, the team has been working to grow our more specialty PMMA products, and these efforts are starting to pay off. That plus our sustainable solutions for consumer electronics are important growth drivers for us in China. Combined in Q1, they delivered 50% volume growth versus prior year and we are adding resources for further growth. Now, I’d like to turn the call over to Dave.

Thanks, Frank. I’d like to give a little more color on the first quarter and what we are seeing in the early part of Q2. [Technical difficulty] was higher than prior year, despite lower volumes sold into automotive and building and construction applications. This was more than offset by higher margins for moderating input costs, particularly natural gas in Europe, as well as better sales mix. Latex Binders adjusted EBITDA was similar to prior year, despite lower volume. Most of this volume decline was into paper and board applications in China, where we’ve seen demand weaken considerably since the tariff announcements. Offsetting this was improved mix with higher sales in case and battery, as well as benefits from our cost savings initiatives. Lastly, Polymer Solutions adjusted EBITDA was also above prior year, despite significantly lower volume, due to $26 million of polycarbonate licensing income in the quarter and our own polycarbonate restructuring actions. Segment volumes were down 15%, driven by lower automotive sales in all three regions, as well as uneconomic volume in polystyrene that we have declined to accept for the time being. The first quarter free cash flow was negative $119 million and included $25 million of outflows related to our refinancing that closed in January. Aside from this, we had a typical seasonal working capital outflow of $84 million as we rebuilt receivables after a very slow end of Q4. We expect free cash flow in the second quarter to be about breakeven and then positive in the second half of 2025. Now I’ll hand the call back over to Frank.

Thanks, Dave. Before I get into our outlook, I’d like to highlight our potential exposure to the proposed tariffs. Over 95% of our product sales are produced within the region in which they are sold, so we anticipate little direct impact. That said, tariffs or disruptions to trade create an uncertain demand environment, particularly in China and for the automotive industry. You’re seeing these impacts in China early in the second quarter where tariff uncertainty has had a significant impact on demand for many of the industrial applications we supply. On the flip side, tariffs may have a positive pricing and demand impact in certain regions where we’re a local producer. For example, in 2024, the U.S. ABS market was about 400 kilotons, of which over 30% was satisfied by imported products, most of which came from Asia. Last year, between 10% and 15% of PMMA resin and surface applications in the U.S. were supplied by Asian imports. Lower imports can obviously have both positive volume and higher price impacts. The largest unknown around tariffs is their impact on overall demand, which could be significant. In December last year, we furnished full-year 2025 guidance in connection with the announcement of our debt refinancing transaction. Since then, the economic and geopolitical conditions have become more uncertain and even more difficult to predict. Therefore, we are withdrawing all previously furnished full-year guidance and will only provide an outlook for the upcoming quarter. We expect second quarter adjusted EBITDA to be between $55 million and $70 million, led by seasonally stronger volumes in building and construction, lower costs in engineered materials, and improved AmSty earnings. We are encouraged by our first quarter performance, and we believe we are seeing the impact of our restructuring actions and the transformation strategy reflected in our results. We continue to gain traction with our specialty and sustainable offerings and remain committed to our focus on higher growth and higher margin business, which we can uniquely serve. In the near term, we’re confident in our ability to navigate these uncertain business conditions and positively manage those things in our control. And now we are happy to take your questions.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And it looks like our first question today comes from the line of Hassan Ahmed with Alembic Global Partners. Hassan, please go ahead.

Good morning, Frank and Dave. Just a question around some of the volume patterns you guys are seeing. You guys obviously talked about the EM business and consumer electronics sort of volumes being up 43% over there. So my question basically is that, did you see some sort of uneven sort of volume patterns ahead of some of these tariffs being implemented? Just trying to get a sense of the sustainability of some of these volumes you guys are seeing?

Yes, Hassan, thanks for the question. We’ve looked at this really closely, and we don’t really see any pre-buying to beat the tariffs or a lumpiness in the demand. In fact, the Q1 demand has continued into Q2 so far. And if you think about this business we’ve made a big effort over the past several years to win new applications and new customers with recycled material. So again, we see it – right now, we don’t see any indication that it was distorted by pre-buying to beat tariffs.

And just two really quick ones: one on the free cash flow guidance for Q2. You guys talked about being sort of breakeven free cash flow wise. How comfortable are you with attaining that with the sort of guidance range you’ve given? So that’s one side of it. And the other side of it is, what are you guys seeing in terms of industry shutdowns, particularly on the styrene, polystyrene side of things?

Yes, Hassan. It’s Dave. I’ll answer the first part. Look, we’re pretty – I mean we’re confident in being able to hit that. We’ve obviously – we’ve got it – we’ve obviously got 1 month in the books already and some visibility into May as well. I mean, we do have working capital levers that we can pull and continue to manage very closely particularly around inventory. So Q1 is a seasonally weak working capital quarter for us because of a working capital bill, variable compensation payments, things like that. So I’d say sitting here where we are today, I think we feel pretty confident in Q2. The other thing I’ll point out is that related to the Deepak or the polycarbonate licensing transaction, we did collect $21 million in April. So, we’ve already collected that and that’s obviously part of it – included in the guidance as well.

Yes, Hassan. Regarding your second question on the impacts of styrene closures, frankly, we don’t really see a big impact or any negative impact to our business, obviously, because we’re no longer a styrene producer in Europe and the European market is significantly oversupplied. So our ability to source material hasn’t been hampered in any way. And as it relates to AmSty, AmSty is very – has one of the best cost positions in the industry and they continue to produce the styrene monomer has been a very good business for them. So, we don’t really see any impacts to our business.

Very helpful. Thanks so much, Frank and Dave.

Alright. Thank you, Hassan. And our next question comes from the line of Matthew Blair with TPH. Matthew, please go ahead.

Thank you and good morning. We had two questions on AmSty. Can you talk a little bit more about the performance in the first quarter? I think the slides mentioned some headwinds from timing issues, but were there also headwinds from outages both on the styrene as well as polystyrene side? And then the second question is, is there any update on the AmSty sale process?

Maybe let me just take the last question first and then I’ll hand the – Dave can talk about the performance in the quarter. So, look, we are fully committed to market AmSty and monetize this asset. We are waiting – our focus is to maximize the value. And so as such, we are going to wait for the best valuation environment that we can get. And when that comes, we will begin actively marketing the asset.

Matthew, so in the – let me start, I guess with the – as you mentioned, the timing and just explain the cause of that as it relates to AmSty. North American benzene prices fell over 30% kind of late in 2024. And that had a timing impact on AmSty in Q4, which moved – which kind of bled into Q1 as well. And it was exacerbated by the low volumes. Low volumes sold both styrene and polystyrene. So, it takes longer for that. There is kind of a lagged effect of the higher-priced benzene going through the P&L. So, that’s what really impacted the first quarter. That was about an $8 million impact in the first quarter. It did also accelerate a relatively minor turnaround from early Q2 into late Q1. That was about another $2 million impact on the quarter. So, the two of those combined are about $10 million impact on Q1, which – look, they did negative $2 million, if you add back that $10 million that’s $8 million, I mean that’s still a – by any historical standard, that’s still a weak quarter for AmSty. And you are right, there was enough – there was a polystyrene outage at one of their polystyrene sites that’s been resolved. So, all other outage issues have been resolved. We do expect significantly better results for AmSty in the second quarter than what we have seen in the first quarter.

It sounds good. And then maybe if I could follow-up, could you talk a little bit more about this opportunity in battery binders? I don’t know if we have seen any mention of that previously. And is this – the slides mentioned it’s related to grid. So, I guess this is more on the industrial side and not exactly autos exposure, is that the right interpretation?

Yes. So, thanks for the question. Actually, we have been investing technical resources in anode binders. So, we make a latex binder that goes into the anode of lithium-ion batteries. And the biggest effort – and we have been winning new platforms and new awards in that area with the various battery manufacturers. And we have been expanding our qualifications to new batteries – battery producers around the world. Now, we have sort of a unique advantage in this. We have a good technology, which we have demonstrated. And also, we have a global footprint that makes us a bit unique relative to the rest of the suppliers to the industry. So, as they expand globally, we can supply that binder in each region. And so it’s been a very, very good growth business for us. And we expect to continue growing because we have a very low penetration of the top 15 suppliers today and – but it’s becoming meaningful. The applications, we just wanted to point out that some of the applications that we have recently won are related to grid storage, and that seems to be getting a lot of traction, but we also have solutions and have one business that go into mobility and automotive batteries. So, yes, that’s – hopefully, that answers the question.

Yes. Thank you very much.

Alright. Thank you, Matthew. [Operator Instructions] And our next question comes from the line of Laurence Alexander with Jefferies. Laurence, please go ahead.

Hey guys. It’s Dan Rizzo on for Laurence. So, I understand with the seasonality with cash flow and what you expect in the second quarter, you did say that you expect cash flow to be positive in the second half of the year. But I was wondering if it’s – I mean is there a path to getting back to breakeven or positive cash flow for the full year of 2025?

I guess what I would – the way I would answer that, I would point you to Slide 13 in our earnings deck, and we have shown this slide in the past couple of earnings releases. And it’s a list of our cash outflows, CapEx, interest, taxes, restructuring costs, etcetera. And if you add it all up, it’s $370 million. So, I think – so our EBITDA would need to be $370 million to be cash flow breakeven for the year. Now, we are not giving full year guidance, obviously. But – now the other thing I would say related to that is the working capital number in here to the extent there would be incremental deterioration in the business and EBITDA was lower, obviously, we would be able to offset that with inventory actions that would – I think would more than offset, frankly, any EBITDA deterioration if we did see that. But – so that’s what I would point you to. Again, I apologize for not directly answering your question, but since we are not giving annual EBITDA guidance, I just think that’s the best way to kind of calibrate it for you.

Thanks for the color. And then is there a possibility or is there like any other licensing deals that could happen with something else or another technology you are working on? Is that something that could be just another avenue of growth?

So, I think the simple answer is yes. And we see a lot of interest in our recycling technologies broadly from the industry, and we are scaling those up and demonstrating those at commercial scale. So, I think in the future, that could also be an opportunity. And frankly, the polycarbonate technology is very attractive and a very good technology as demonstrated by the interest from Deepak. So, I wouldn’t preclude that we could do more in the polycarbonate area, too.

Thank you very much.

Thanks. And our next question comes from the line of Frank Mitsch with Fermium Research. Frank, please go ahead.

Thank you. Good morning. I want to follow-up on AmSty. On a normal basis, you said about $8 million in 1Q and you expected it to be materially higher. I forget exactly the euphemism to be higher in the second quarter. Last quarter, you indicated that you thought 2025 would kind of get us closer to that average of $65 million or so. How are you thinking about AmSty profitability? And any orders of magnitude you could provide around that would be very helpful.

Yes, Frank, we – like we said last year, the average from 2022 or 2020 to 2024 for AmSty was about $68 million of EBITDA contribution, and we expect to be much closer to that than we were to last year’s performance, which by memory was 15. So, again, notwithstanding the timing impact that we saw in Q1, I think we still have the confidence in that trajectory.

Okay. Great. So, we are going to be mid-40s or higher by year-end, potentially on AmSty. And yes, coming back, I mean one of the highlights was clearly consumer electronics, that 43% growth. And last quarter, it was up 61%, which are not normal sort of growth. I am just curious if you could expand upon that business and kind of orders of magnitude as well in the portfolio because obviously, these numbers are pretty eye-popping.

Yes. The – so let me give you examples of where we are supplying into that – those applications. So, almost all consumer electronic brands are products that we would supply into. And if you – so this could be the device itself, it could be chargers, it could be any number of other products. And one of the big drivers in consumer electronics is sustainability or circularity. And we have been able to meet all of the technical requirements with very high levels of recycled material contained in our product. So, upwards of over 50% recycled content, and we believe we have a unique advantage because of that. So, I would – if you name a brand or if you think of a brand, we are probably in some of their devices with that material with a sustainable solution. And if you go to Page 10 in our presentation, you can see that it’s not insignificant. It’s 20% of our Asia Pacific revenue is consumer electronics. And to give you a sense, is this one of the higher-margin businesses, more specialized businesses that we have in the portfolio. So, that – you can do some of the arithmetic to get to an order of magnitude of how big that is.

Yes. So, it was interesting because Asia Pacific was down significantly and yet this business was up significantly. So, obviously, the rest of Asia Pacific was very problematic.

Well, so yes, the rest of Asia – what was driving Asia Pacific from a significant – on a significant downward trajectory was the sales that go into appliances. So, you could see appliances is for our HIPS products is a big – polystyrene is a big application for us in Asia. And then paper and board was – has also got off to a very slow start. And we think that a lot of that is tariff driven. So – but those tend to be the lower margin parts of our business also. So, I would say in Asia, it was where we saw significant negative volume developments year-over-year was in the appliances and paper and board. And then obviously, in the other areas, the more formulated products improvements.

Frank, I just want to add one thing. Just related to the comment on volume, I mean so if you look at Asia, in particular for us, polystyrene is about 45% of our total Asia volume. So, when we are talking about Trinseo as a whole and the volume changes as a whole, polystyrene kind of dwarfed just because of the market size. I mean really dwarfs kind of over washes by a large margin volume changes in consumer electronics, for example, that have far higher margins, obviously, but the volumes just aren’t there. So, Frank is right. In Asia is where we have seen two things. It’s where we have kind of walked away from the uneconomic business on a year-over-year basis. It’s also where we have – the home appliance, the export market for appliances out of China has been severely affected by the tariffs. So, that’s the real driver of the polystyrene decline on a year-over-year basis. And then we have got latex binders as well, which goes into paper and board applications in China is down kind of mid-teens year-over-year. And I think that’s also really kind of been exacerbated by the tariff announcements.

Okay. Terrific. Thanks so much.