Thanks, John. We're continuing to grow recurring revenue and managed expenses. We're growing our net income even faster and with our share repurchase program ongoing, we're doing even better yet in terms of earnings per share. Simultaneously, we've also grown our cash balance, paid down half of our debt, and we've begun paying the dividend. As you can see, we've built a consistent cash generation machine with more than 5 consecutive years of GAAP profitability. I believe an important metric that we have not historically talked about that warrants pointing out is our current ratio. That current ratio is now 5.2:1. Let me say that again, 5.2:1. That means the company can pay its current obligations 5 times over. I've been in this business for a long time. I've not seen a metric for a company of our size ever. Another metric that should be noted is our annual revenue per employee. With 64 employees, the company generates almost $300,000 per employee per year. Based on independent comparisons, that's over double compared to our peers. That number and our belief will continue to grow over the next few years as our revenue grows substantially and our headcount only increases marginally. Furthermore, as we've said, incremental revenue over our $12 million annual cash operating expenses is largely converted to incremental cash, 82% in the current quarter, in fact. If you analyze our first quarter cash from operations and assume no growth, we've grown our annual cash from operations by about 27% on a CAGR compounded annual growth rate basis. since 2018. Our business is efficient. Needless to say, it's easy to model, we think, and we're certainly positioned to scale. Our recent performance doesn't include any revenue at all in terms of the contribution for the largest opportunity we have to date, traceability. So let's talk about that opportunity. Just last week, the FDA announced the final rules that will govern how food businesses can safely trade with one another. It's called FSMA Food Safety Modernization Act, Rule 204 and otherwise known as Track & Trace. The guidance has been expected for several years. The effective date now will be January 2023. The FDA is obviously going to allow a period for companies as they generally do to get ready for this massive change on how the food supply chain is going to function. From where we are now, we think the earliest adopters of track and trace are likely larger retailers and wholesalers. We already see and have for some time seen the benefits of greater visibility into their supply chains. For retailers track and trace as an important risk mitigation initiative even without the FDA mandate. Retailers restaurants are virtually anyone who handles the foods covered by this rule 204 will be required to capture information as these products arrive at their backdoor. Since this has been in the works for actually a decade, many suppliers have already installed labeling systems, et cetera, to create a traceability framework. Many suppliers naively believe they are already compliant. Education is going to be key to debunk this misunderstanding, yes, misunderstanding. They don't or at least don't in a workable way actually comply with how the regulation affects them and their supply chain, seriously. Sadly, most of the installed systems are not adequate to what the market is going to, in fact, require. What might work for an individual business in isolation doesn't work necessarily for the customers of that business who have to figure out what is on each label and if that covers their regulatory needs. In terms of these millions of labeling systems, there are no standards. So it's the Wild Wild West for who puts what where on any given label. If each supplier puts the required information in a different place on the label or fails to provide all of the data required by the FDA, it's going to be a nightmare for the retailer trying to read these cases, not just the nightmare but in truth, completely unworkable. Important to remember that the wholesalers and retailers are the customers of these suppliers, their largest customers. So retailers will ultimately push their requirements downstream and certainly force all suppliers to use the solution that they require rather than simply accepting the solution that the supplier adopted. We're hopeful that, that solution will be us. We're a very different kind of technology. It's an simply a labeling system or a blockchain or any of those sorts of things? We ride above any individual solution and make the data readable to any recipient without just having to do, change or implement any other system or change in their current process. We're a universal translator as a way of thinking about it for any system or process, large, medium or small retailer supplier or intermediary. Take the idea of a label that's been put on a box. Many of the data elements that are required by Rule 204 aren't even known when the label is created. In contrast, we uniquely ride over and above all of the labeling systems and allow the FDA required data to be exchanged without scanning the label. Ours is a no labor, no touch and very cost-effective system that enables the required exchange of data. Both the suppliers and their customers need us. So think of it this way. If a supplier has 20 customers that each want the data to be in a different place form, et cetera, that becomes a monster problem for him. Alternatively, maybe in reverse, if a retailer has 200 suppliers, he has an even more dire need to solve that problem. When viewed from 100,000 feet, this is in part a network issue. So we think it's best solved as a network issue. So now imagine how well positioned we are with the already largest connected network of food companies on earth. We have said for years what we're really building is the network. Now we're there and the payoff is just about to begin. The network scale we already have puts us, we believe, literally in the catbird seat of traceability. What we don't know yet, though are which retailers will move first, how quickly they'll move and perhaps most challenging for us, what the supplier level landscape looks like in terms of installed technology that we'll have to work with. So this won't be easy, but we're certainly up to the task. Remember, our ReposiTrak traceability network, or RTN, is really a repurposing of our robust supply chain technology that's been in place for years. We already work with countless different systems, allowing frictionless data exchange. Technically, we actually think that the FDA traceability requirements are much easier than the other things that we already do and do at scale in our platform. But traceability is going to mean substantial recurring revenue at great margins for us. And at the moment, we've already begun to work with some suppliers, retailers and wholesalers on a rollout strategy for them. There's also a growing number of tests and planning with our ReposiTrak traceability network and we're excited about what that might lead to. As you know, this is much sooner than we had expected. Beyond traceability, our core business and supply chain and compliance continues to grow and we're getting deeper into the trading relationships, farming the network, and all of that will reflect itself in an even faster recurring growth rate in our second half. Importantly, our growing compliance business is actually also a catalyst to traceability. Under Rule 204, as we call it, we now have nearly 10,000 facilities that could be users of our ReposiTrak traceability network over time. That's a lot of work over the next years. And obviously, it's a lot of revenue. Over time, by the way, the number of Rule 204 covered products will expand. The FDA has actually explicitly said that. That, in turn, will grow our customer TAM even more as time goes by and more products and suppliers need traceability. Of course, we certainly expect litigation to challenge the requirements and time lines for Rule 204 that were just finalized. Nevertheless, in our view, the likely outcome is that Rule 204 becomes effective in phases over the next few years. I want to be clear, and I know this sounds counterintuitive. However, a longer time for implementation is better for us and much better for the food industry. Why? Well, It's an extremely complicated rule, and it has to be phased in. Most people probably don't know that more than half the grocery stores in this country are individually owned. Independent grocers are still more than half the total market. The idea that 18,000 independently owned supermarkets and 1 million restaurants and foodservice establishments touched by Rule 204 can create and deploy a solution simultaneously, bringing suppliers and wholesalers along, laughable, it's going to take a while. The scale is clearly enormous, and we've been preparing for it. So reasonable question to ask, what are we doing about it? First, our marketing effort is set up and running. We're holding webinars and running advertisements to boost awareness and education of the coming requirements and the RTN solution, as we call it. We're leveraging our partnership with National Grocers Association, which represents most of the independent grocers and more than 20,000 stores nationwide. The role of MGA will be to help us educate the market about traceability and what it means for them. Education will be key for retailers, suppliers and wholesalers to effectively deal with 204. So in summary, we'll continue to keep our customers first, focus on them since we know that when they're successful, they buy more. We'll continue to grow our recurring revenue with a target of 10% to 20% CAGR over time. Our bottom line is going to grow faster because of our efficiencies and our EPS will grow faster yet as we continue to reduce our shares outstanding. We are investing incidentally, as I'm sure you know, in our customized automation built in-house to further our own operational efficiency. By the way, it's an interesting side note, we're now selling this AI-based CRM type system to some customers. Think of it this way. Sell what we use, use what we sell. We will also continue to invest in initiatives, including technology to enable organic growth. Since Rule 204 covers food service restaurants, et cetera, we're actively engaged in exploring opportunities in that space. we believe we may see even, in fact, a win or 2 in the space from early adopters over the next year. And if we do, we should see demand accelerate within those verticals also. It's speculative but we're certainly having some encouraging conversations at this point. So there you have it. Our plan is clearly working. The proof is in the pudding. We feel very good about where we are, and we will stay the course, simple. So with that, I'd like to open the call for questions. Operator?