REX - NYSE

Good morning, and welcome to the REX American Resources Third Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call. As a reminder, today's call is being recorded. And at this time, all participants are in listen-only mode. A brief question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. I would now like to turn the call over to Mr. Doug Bruggeman, Chief Financial Officer of REX American. Please go ahead.

Good morning, and thank you for joining REX American Resources Q3 2024 conference call. With me on our call today are Stuart Rose, REX Executive Chairman; and

Good morning, and thank you again to everyone for joining us. During the third quarter, REX American Resources continued our progress on our three goals for 2024, setting the Company up for success well into the future. As a reminder, these goals were to continue profitable operations to complete the construction phase of our One Earth Energy carbon capture and compression facility and to complete the capacity expansion of our One Earth Energy ethanol production facility to 175 million gallons per year and move toward the planned further permitting of the facility to 200 million gallons per year. To the first goal, we exceeded the mark. The third quarter was REX American Resources' second most profitable quarter in the Company's history behind only the third quarter of 2023. Our net income per share of $1.38 was an improvement of 97% over the second quarter of 2024, principally reflecting better corn pricing. Gross margin improved over the third quarter of 2023 by 1% despite a 21% reduction in product revenue. As we have consistently said, we believe REX's facilities and personnel are among the best in the industry, which they proved quarter after quarter through their attention to detail and awareness of the markets. The focus on lean and efficient operations in our core ethanol business, we believe, will serve as a basis for future increases in profit levels. Once our One Earth plant expansion is up and running next year. It is this part of the business that has allowed REX to grow substantially debt-free, maintain strategic freedom and move forward independently with additive growth projects. As we always do, I want to say thank you to our team for the efforts this quarter and every day. And the second goal to complete construction of the capture and compression portion of our One Earth Energy CCS project in Gibson City, Illinois. We have substantially realized this goal. I'll let

Thank you, Stuart. The expansion of our One Earth Energy ethanol facility to 175 million gallons per year of production is estimated to be complete by the middle of 2025. Currently, the electric interconnection from our local utility is moving ahead and should be complete by first quarter of 2025. The time line for completion of the ethanol production expansion has been extended from our previous target to the middle of 2025 due to delays recently communicated by one of our equipment suppliers for delivery of several necessary components. After completion of the expansion and emission certification, we then expect to begin the planned further permitting of the One Earth ethanol facility to allow it to produce 200 million gallons per year. As I have said before, the regulatory steps receiving an additional permit is the only step necessary to allow for the expanded capacity from 175 million to 200 million gallons as no major additional construction or capital spending is expected. The expansion will give REX additional earnings power, allow us to sell more product from our highly efficient consolidated plant in Gibson City. We expect that the expansion will provide even greater benefit to shareholders as well as our ability to self-fund ongoing and future growth projects. As Stuart previously said, the carbon capture and compression portion of our One Earth Energy project in Gibson City, Illinois, is substantially complete. We are excited about reaching these milestones, and we are looking forward to other portion of the project. Just add with the expansion of our ethanol operation at the One Earth site, further work and testing in the capture and compression facilities are subject to completion of the utility interconnection to supply power to the project. Beyond waiting for power, we continue to wait on several regulatory issues to be resolved. Our permit application for Class 6 injection wells are still under review with anticipated final approval slated for July 2025 according to the EPA. As a result of these challenges and as the capture and compression portion of the projects are substantially complete, we plan to manage near-term major capital expenditure related to the CCS project in order to maintain budgetary flexibility and stay within project spend in light of the time line for approval. Given the new permitting reality, we are confident that pursuing the several ongoing portion of this project in this way is the right path. As of quarter end, we have invested approximately $103 million into the One Earth carbon capture project and ethanol production capacity expansion combined. Spending for the carbon capture and sequestration projects stood at $52.9 million as of third quarter end, while expenditure on the ethanol expansion stood at $50.2 million as of the same date. This is compared to total combined budgeted amount of $165 million to $175 million for both the CCS project and ethanol production expansion at Gibson City. I would like to hand the call to our CFO, Doug Bruggeman, to discuss our operational and financial results.

Thanks,

Thanks, Doug. I would now like to discuss how we see the end of the fiscal year shaping up. As Stuart stated earlier, our plants continue to run with positive earnings into the fourth quarter, but not at the level of last year's fourth quarter. Corn input prices have improved compared to a year ago. And given the bumper crop of corn in the Midwest, we expect adequate supply for our plants for this growing season. As we have mentioned before, we do see sporting dynamics for ethanol pricing for the export market. Ethanol exports through the first nine months of the calendar year were approximately 33% higher than at the same point in calendar 2023 according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. This level returns U.S. export to their pre-pandemic levels and puts the U.S. on pace to exceed 2018 export volumes. Currently, the all-time high year for export. Looking ahead to 2025, we are particularly excited about the completion of our ethanol production expansion and anticipated increase in profitability this will allow for. We will still expect approval of our Class 6 permit from the EPA in the near term and to continue making progress on our CCS facility, which we expect would bring additional profitability once in operation. Looking further down the road, the projects we are working on today are laying the groundwork for further potential growth into sustainable aviation fuel and third-party carbon sequestration. We are excited about the future as we grow organically and are confident in our team's ability to rise to the challenges at every turn. Now, I would like to open things up to questions. Operator?

Thank you. We will now be conducting a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Jordan Levy with Truist. Please proceed with your question.

Congratulations on the solid quarter. I wanted to get your thoughts here. There was just an article I saw from Reuters that was saying the Biden administration won't finalize 45

My opinion -- this is Stuart. I'll answer first and

Yes. I think the only hope you and I see because in Midwest is basically the farmers and corn growers. And there's a lot of support we receive from farmers and corn growers because they are also looking for -- to see how they can benefit from 45

One other thing, Jordan, at this time, 45Q is in effect, and that's cut and dry at $85 a ton, that has passed legislatively. So, if nothing -- if we don't get 45

Yes. And I think I'd add to that is, as you know, Jordan, that you have to be servicing by 2032. And so, we have enough time -- '34 actually, 2034. So, we have enough time to really to be in service before time expire. But 45

Got it. And then, you all have always been a very prudent allocators of capital. Stuart,

Well, one thing we've always done, Jordan, as you know, when the stock drops -- if the stock ever drops significantly, we are keen to buybacks. We bought back probably more shares percentage-wise than any other company I know. So that's one thing. The other thing is we always are looking for opportunities, whether it's new ethanol plants. There are a few that we're looking at, but that doesn't mean anything. They're in the very, very preliminary stages and who knows if anything will happen. Generally, today, the prices people want is way above what we're willing to pay. So that's an issue. But that's always an opportunity. And thirdly, we're not afraid to go into other things that are related -- either related or sometimes even unrelated to our business that we think our management skills will work with. We haven't done that in a while. But as you know, we were retailers at one time and now we're ethanol producers. So, we're very good -- if it comes to that of looking if we see great opportunities of jumping on those if they become available.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line of Pavel Molchanov with Raymond James. Please proceed with your question.

Following up on the discussion you just had about kind of future federal policy. It's probably going to be three months, six months before Congress moves forward with tax reform, which may well include some changes to the Inflation Reduction Act, for example, Section 45Q. Are you going to postpone any kind of decisions on the carbon capture project until you get clarity that 45Q will remain in place?

At this point in time, Pavel, we don't -- if 45Q goes away, this is only my -- what I would -- and again, this is not a Board of Directors' decision. It's Stuart Rose talking. But as far -- we would continue on. We would continue on with carbon capture because we'll get a greater -- if no one else is doing carbon capture, we're doing and we'll get a much greater price for -- I believe we'll get a much greater price for ethanol. And I believe there'll still be a market to sell our credits to companies that want to become carbon neutral. So, I don't think that we would end our project if there was -- and we don't -- at this point in time, we don't expect them to end 45, but anything is possible with the Trump administration, and we're well aware of that. But my personal opinion, and it's only my personal opinion, would be, we would continue on with the project. And I think it would still be a good project. We wouldn't get government help, but there's definitely a market for low carbon jet fuel, and I can go on in California, a few places. There's a good market for low-carbon ethanol, and we would be one of the few producers. So, my personal opinion would be to continue on with that.

Yes. I think I will add to that. If you remember, we started this project in 2018. At that time, there was no Inflation Reduction Act there. And it was approximately $50 was tax credit, and that tax credit was also gone through Trump administration during that. So, I don't really see that there are going to be major changes to 45Q. And also, you are aware of that several other facilities are already working on this 45Q carbon sequestration, including the project for $7 billion to $8 billion worth for the carbon pipeline. So, these people have invested a lot of money on these projects and sudden changes will -- probably will not be implemented because this project is already in pipeline and changes can happen, but I personally don't anticipate that there's going to be any changes in 45Q.

Okay. Maybe a follow-up on the ethanol front. You have a long history of operating ethanol plants, including, of course, under Trump's first term. Can you just give some historical perspective on how the EPA went about setting the blending mandates between kind of 2017 and 2021 and how you managed around that?

At that time, Pavel, I believe it was legislatively set, and there was a number of gallons that were -- in the law that were the RFS required. Nowadays, I believe that the EPA can set that level wherever they want. And that could be an issue going forward. We don't know. But again, if they set it at a lower level, that could be a problem. If they -- if he really wants to be energy independent like he claims, they could set it at a higher level. We have no idea what they're going to do, but they -- I believe today have the ability to set it at whatever level they choose.

We have no further questions at this time. I would like to turn the floor back over to management for closing comments.

I just wanted to thank everyone for listening. I want to -- again, we had another very good quarter, outperforming most, if not all, of the industry. We have the best plants, great locations, even a great location for a carbon capture project, which we hope to implement in -- sometime in the next couple of years, hopefully sooner than that. And most importantly, we feel and we really feel we have the best people in the industry, and that's what sets us apart. And again, with the best people with our CEO, I consider the best in the industry. I think most other people do, too. We're well set up for the future. Thank you very much for listening to the call. Bye.